Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
UdjinM6
54681dbf09
fix(tests): a couple of fixes for dynamically_add/update functions (#5288)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should hopefully fix some sporadic ci test failures (like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4052206622#L1962)

## What was done?
tweaked dynamically_add/update functions to make checks more consistent
and avoid some edge cases, pls see individual commits

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_hpmn.py` and `feature_dip3_v19.py` still work locally,
let's see if ci is now (constantly) happy about these too...

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 00:09:18 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
e7badf1da1
fix: check HPMNs duplicate on tx broadcast (#5257)
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above

Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.

Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:

* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
  should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
  was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
  consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->

## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Before this fix, uniqueness of HPMN `platformNodeID` was checked only
while processing a block containing a `ProRegTx` or a `ProUpServTx`.
This is not enough as a `ProRegTx` or `ProUpServTx` containing duplicate
HPMN `platformNodeID` must be rejected at tx broadcast level.

## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Checking uniqueness when calling respective RPC and when receiving such
txs.

## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->


## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->


## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-03-16 18:28:38 +02:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
9cd657fae5
test: dip4 test adjustement to hpmns (#5207)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented


## What was done?

1. Increased protocol version of mininode to match v19 changes in
`MNLISTDIFF` P2P message
2. Added verification of MNs and HPMNs (dip4) in `feature_llmq_hpmn.py`


## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-02-19 11:33:18 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
0923511c25
feat(llmq): llmq_test_platform threshold adjustment (#5204)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?
As discussed with Platform team, threshold for `llmq_test_platform`
needed to be 67%. Therefore, the size went from 4 members to 3 (while
keeping threshold to 2)

## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-02-17 13:20:56 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
a3918451d0
feat(rpc): masternode status and count RPCs adjusted for HPMNs (#5206)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?
-  `masternode status` now returns the type as well
- `masternode count` now returns in addition total and total enabled MNs
per type.


## How Has This Been Tested?
Added functional tests


## Breaking Changes

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-02-17 12:29:46 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
aa8462b060
feat!: 4k collateral high performance masternode implementation (#5039)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented


## What was done?
Implementation of 4k collateral HPMN.

## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+pastapastapasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <1935069+Udjinm6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <545784+knst@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-02-14 12:48:33 -06:00