7c6c93d201 fix: remove missing comment to follow-up for bitcoin#15864 (Konstantin Akimov)
65226da849 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22229: test: consolidate to f-strings (part 1) (MarcoFalke)
ad2c5a53ee refactor: unify feature_notifications.py after #5522 with bitcoin's codebase (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Just one backport bitcoin#22229 because it is a big size, even though there's nothing non-trivial in it.
Though, even it is called as part I, there has not been part II yet.
## What was done?
Some preparation, code unifications to make bitcoin#22229 with less conflicts and finally backport of itselfl.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit & functional test
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 7c6c93d201
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 7c6c93d201
Tree-SHA512: fe296e3255d45a7a1924bd1e5e21634b3cd36ea3f71cf5e8684b54336771665ea7758de7bfc78721669a928f967e7d4db7b1da0a5cd275feb1a2ec0df841ad5c
a856b81f0e ci: drop unneeded comments (pasta)
189233b987 ci: handle ccache / depends based on build_target not host to avoid failing to cache all the linux 86_64 runs (pasta)
cbeeb9e00d ci: adjust caching strategy (pasta)
354d6a9aab ci: cache depends sources in a seperate step (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Improve GitHub Actions caching to not have such large caches that get evicted frequently
## What was done?
Use hash files on depends for depends related caching
bring all depends sources under shared cache
## How Has This Been Tested?
CI in my branches
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK a856b81f0e
Tree-SHA512: f3d6cfeccfed0c811686a8becc548097b63c34a338cd5ff84445a8e9254c6aa03a394125c90aab705873f39156375bbbbd6d90979d6fa78b7479f10508b21d6e
84fbf9b2841a9ba1ebd1421b9ff9fe444bb1abd9 depends: remove -g from sqlite debug flags (fanquake)
eef51afc6a29c693a68400930ef8011be41b7401 depends: add -g to DEBUG=1 flags (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Add `-g` to the base DEBUG=1 flags in depends.
Avoids the need to specify it per-package.
More alignment with `--enable-debug` behaviour in configure.
We also want to align the optimization flags, currently -O1 vs -O0, however that can be it's own PR.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK 84fbf9b2841a9ba1ebd1421b9ff9fe444bb1abd9
Tree-SHA512: 1ee98ba0c13e4b80bb87632658b4f53ce49c73e0e7712990c30da60deca4a349a744232f2d78f243dee9a07f5b9b70f9c2c4ae34082c34ae51b37b054fac61fd
5f2c1d84e37697f4f8a20e3c12f37bba71b3c2a6 guix: show *_FLAGS variables in pre-build output (fanquake)
Pull request description:
For example:
```bash
# ADDITIONAL_GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS set in the ENV
ADDITIONAL_GUIX_ENVIRONMENT_FLAGS="--emulate-fhs" ./contrib/guix/guix-build
<snip>
INFO: Building f751991 for platform triple x86_64-linux-gnu:
...using reference timestamp: 1716905119
...running at most 10 jobs
...from worktree directory: '/bitcoin'
...bind-mounted in container to: '/bitcoin'
...in build directory: '/bitcoin/guix-build-f75199182133/distsrc-f75199182133-x86_64-linux-gnu'
...bind-mounted in container to: '/distsrc-base/distsrc-f75199182133-x86_64-linux-gnu'
...outputting in: '/bitcoin/guix-build-f75199182133/output/x86_64-linux-gnu'
...bind-mounted in container to: '/outdir-base/x86_64-linux-gnu'
ADDITIONAL FLAGS (if set)
ADDITIONAL_GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS: --no-substitutes
ADDITIONAL_GUIX_ENVIRONMENT_FLAGS: --emulate-fhs
ADDITIONAL_GUIX_TIMEMACHINE_FLAGS:
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 5f2c1d84e37697f4f8a20e3c12f37bba71b3c2a6.
Tree-SHA512: 85a6d508499b4ec1d6166343a1707b682d327b2fcfb2fb438571894478aac0062d21e1239b5092091ff98711c5c747151973c4f325a7a7c447d0e807166fcb07
141df0a28810470e53fdbc6d32d3cb4020fe3ca1 crypto: disable asan for sha256_sse4 with clang and -O0 (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Clang is unable to compile the Transform function for that combination of options.
Fixes#29801.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 141df0a28810470e53fdbc6d32d3cb4020fe3ca1
Tree-SHA512: d74fdac5840ad7524edfde069fb43ae75c31146e90ecc58bbc7912ff57a02b068547431b1766afeed782272c0b93b0b41a286c1cf26ec55ce332d94ce917d810
019ad7327c397094d7648b55503bf5373b108a57 depends: set RANLIB for CMake (fanquake)
43cfb428cba04b8db98d4d0d56ffe28ad686e58c depends: set NM for CMake (fanquake)
1e4412b317f74dd64069309544fe73c95e2c10e7 depends: set AR for CMake (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Needed for #21778. Should be more correct in any case.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
utACK 019ad7327c397094d7648b55503bf5373b108a57. I didn't test, but I tried this approach on a few deps and it seemed to work as expected.
TheCharlatan:
ACK 019ad7327c397094d7648b55503bf5373b108a57
Tree-SHA512: 78cc8981456f7476cafca0e40fcc569e474b92004c8024d1c4268b6aab53175074a06ab17ebded8d706bf0a7f77401642dd38bb7ce2e4b04abdcd149d3d69969
37389c7d38 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28781: depends: latest config.guess & config.sub (fanquake)
3239f1525d Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28479: build: use _LIBCPP_ENABLE_DEBUG_MODE over ENABLE_ASSERTIONS (fanquake)
45cc44bcf9 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27628: build: Fix shared lib linking for darwin with lld (fanquake)
b8ddcd937c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27575: Introduce platform-agnostic `ALWAYS_INLINE` macro (fanquake)
71c6d7f6ca Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26653: test, init: perturb file to ensure failure instead of only deleting them (fanquake)
417f71a587 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27422: test: add coverage to rpc_scantxoutset.py (fanquake)
898dcbdc4f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27559: doc: clarify processing of mempool-msgs when NODE_BLOOM (glozow)
a4e429cb5a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26953: contrib: add ELF OS ABI check to symbol-check.py (fanquake)
deb7de26dd Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26604: test: add coverage for `-bantime` (fanquake)
f725ed509a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26314: test: perturb anchors.dat to test error during initialization (fanquake)
3306f96d80 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25937: test: add coverage for rpc error when trying to rescan beyond pruned data (fanquake)
712dcaf86b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27516: test: simplify uint256 (de)serialization routines (fanquake)
90d65f25e1 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27508: build: use latest config.{guess,sub} in depends (fanquake)
df7be026e4 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27506: test: prevent intermittent failures (fanquake)
9b58b2d97b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27447: depends: Remove `_LIBCPP_DEBUG` from depends DEBUG mode (fanquake)
07770b77a1 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26741: doc: FreeBSD DataDirectoryGroupReadable Setting (fanquake)
5645362f11 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27362: test: remove `GetRNGState` lsan suppression (fanquake)
671e8e6851 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27368: refactor: Drop no longer used `CNetMsgMaker` instances (fanquake)
a11690bf62 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27301: depends: make fontconfig build under clang-16 (fanquake)
0a94b3f27b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27328: depends: fix osx build with clang 16 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Batch of trivial backports
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 37389c7d38
kwvg:
utACK 37389c7d38
Tree-SHA512: 1ea075a58361f57e037febcf003d380ab845b6c8e1c62d9fcf8954d46cd006046d1951f15a41a5deb9ab7af734df9dafcf89f33d115d78246752f7e2cd13f4ee
168e5e4a50 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28877: bench: Update nanobench to 4.3.11 (fanquake)
417c86b949 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28105: doc: Clarify that -fstack-reuse=all bugs exist on all versions of GCC (fanquake)
a620cccd81 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26970: test: fix immediate tx relay in wallet_groups.py (merge-script)
f115d9c27f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27061: doc: Document affected gcc versions for -fstack-reuse=none workaround (fanquake)
6889a8db29 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27056: doc: use arch agnostic clang path in fuzzing doc (macOS) (MarcoFalke)
97858384ec Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21995: build: Make dependency package archive timestamps deterministic (fanquake)
c4760bb32e Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27030: Update nanobench to version v4.3.10 (fanquake)
a7e3c2c916 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#705: doc: Fix comment about how wallet txs are sorted (Hennadii Stepanov)
44e6c9e902 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27004: test: Use std::unique_ptr over manual delete in coins_tests (fanquake)
2ab1989a39 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27010: refactor: use `Hash` helpers for double-SHA256 calculations (MarcoFalke)
c681aaad30 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22811: build: Fix depends build system when working with subtargets (fanquake)
d1b7386374 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26930: fuzz: Actually use mocked mempool in tx_pool target (MarcoFalke)
cd53a195a6 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26873: doc: add databases/py-sqlite3 to FreeBSD test suite deps (fanquake)
8cc5f11a2f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26506: refactor: rpc: use convenience fn to auto parse non-string parameters (MarcoFalke)
662302c42b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26805: tests: Use unique port for ZMQ tests to allow for multiple test instances (MarcoFalke)
66a3981a7a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24279: build: Make `$(package)_*_env` available to all `$(package)_*_cmds` (fanquake)
3261092f85 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26520: doc: test: update/fix TestShell example instructions (fanquake)
5f78859562 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25248: refactor: Add LIFETIMEBOUND / -Wdangling-gsl to Assert() (fanquake)
459425776c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26229: test: Use proper Boost macros instead of assertions (MacroFake)
3be81a2d4c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25915: test: Fix wallet_balance intermittent issue (Andrew Chow)
da1d3f2654 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25663: tracing: do not use `coin` after move in `CCoinsViewCache::AddCoin` (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Batch of trivial backports
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 168e5e4a50
Tree-SHA512: 3099e09bc500a86bffafea0db136e3213f69b69e7af74304c171780e56ff1ff4c973a228962cf80aec62158ded19365d6f8506ef202a15751a43851574f082e2
750447e345 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#20586: Fix Windows build with --enable-werror (W. J. van der Laan)
368a6ef512 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#390: Add SubFeeFromAmount to options (Hennadii Stepanov)
7df9788c85 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#381: refactor: Make BitcoinCore class reusable (W. J. van der Laan)
40a8b925db Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22688: contrib: use `keys.openpgp.org` to retrieve builder keys (fanquake)
62b5358a9c Merge #11909: contrib: Replace developer keys with list of pgp fingerprints (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
1ff42b40e3 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21500: wallet, rpc: add an option to list private descriptors (Samuel Dobson)
5a803ae765 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22378: test: remove confusing `MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE` (MarcoFalke)
42a0cf0709 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21562: [net processing] Various tidying up of PeerManagerImpl ctor (MarcoFalke)
e3c69da4f2 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22232: refactor: Pass interpreter flags as uint32_t instead of signed int (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Regular batch of backports from Bitcoin v23
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 750447e345
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 750447e345
Tree-SHA512: 46e0de22798937b6b0a228ea9ca39b465cd9e8b822f973f23af80fccb1fe2d733716930d3f3843aaf41a58225aa98e18cd5d5e361245f64e146ff1be118f91ca
49a92579c705831c7ffbcfb24cdf17a94e9a11a0 build: latest config.sub in depends (fanquake)
ced0435a718ddda1451fb49af03bef07ca25b333 build: latest config.guess in depends (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Before we make any local modifications (i.e #28733) pull the latest files from upstream.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 49a92579c705831c7ffbcfb24cdf17a94e9a11a0
Tree-SHA512: fbbe0d6ef72a196a652467af0550b38da23b932fe68da4965a9b0dc4795db9c869969db98f660cd360f6af3a7659b46c25e3fd398e0ef127dae71726b9a915a6
4a825039a509c43ba20b2cd7aab448b3be16bcc3 build: use _LIBCPP_ENABLE_DEBUG_MODE over ENABLE_ASSERTIONS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` is deprecated, and will be removed. [See (from libc++ __config in main)](b57df9fe9a/libcxx/include/__config (L205-L209)):
> TODO(hardening): remove this in LLVM 19.
> This is for backward compatibility -- make enabling `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` (which predates hardening modes)
> equivalent to setting the safe mode.
> ifdef _LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS
> warning "_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS is deprecated, please use _LIBCPP_ENABLE_SAFE_MODE instead."
From LLVM 17, `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_DEBUG_MODE` can be used instead, which also performs more checks than safe mode:
> Enables the debug mode which contains all the checks from the hardened mode and additionally more expensive checks that may affect the complexity of algorithms. The debug mode is intended to be used for testing, not in production. Mutually exclusive with `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_HARDENED_MODE` and `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_SAFE_MODE`.
See https://libcxx.llvm.org/Hardening.html.
Related to #28476.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4a825039a509c43ba20b2cd7aab448b3be16bcc3 🙏
Tree-SHA512: ca52603f86214e8e9350bd2b2baa44fbde0f72f1b186da7aecd8690256dff5b2be75fe89383158298a6f683bbd6ae0dff528d2ba4cc5ece1f56cfbdee0e1dc5d
67aacc73ea427f89f005ae17d5fd1572409e649e build: cleanup comments after adding yet another libtool hack (Cory Fields)
283d95516a11166631818dd448ed53a2374b5db8 build: Fix shared lib linking for darwin with lld (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Solves one of the last remaining blockers for #21778. Fixes lld linking shared libs for macos via libtool.
lld fails one of libtool's earliest checks [because it happens to output a warning that contains a specific string](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/tree/m4/libtool.m4#n999):
> # If there is a non-empty error log, and "single_module"
> # appears in it, assume the flag caused a linker warning
And here is the test being run:
> x86_64-apple-darwin-ld: warning: Option `-single_module' is deprecated in ld64:
> x86_64-apple-darwin-ld: warning: Unnecessary option: this is already the default
Because the warning is printed the test fails. So libtool falls back to a very primitive and broken link-line for shared libs.
Arguably this should be worked-around in upstream lld by changing the warning string, as otherwise every libtool project will fail to link with it.
Like many other libtool hacks, the solution is to simply disable the check and hard-code the answer we know to be correct.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 67aacc73ea427f89f005ae17d5fd1572409e649e
Tree-SHA512: 792e4d208a3a4921edb5f267f43ecd052b5b650df0db5cb2788ee1e4f3c4087413f354b22e407ff5fa2f99a22a16154ec6826d14c6654a57c00aae3b3e744bca
c371cae07a7ba045130568b6abc470eaa4f95ef4 test, init: perturb file to ensure failure instead of only deleting them (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
In `feature_init.py` there is a TODO about perturbing the files instead of only testing by deleting them.
```py
# TODO: at some point, we should test perturbing the files instead of removing
# them, e.g.
#
# contents = target_file.read_bytes()
# tweaked_contents = bytearray(contents)
# tweaked_contents[50:250] = b'1' * 200
# target_file.write_bytes(bytes(tweaked_contents))
#
# At the moment I can't get this to work (bitcoind loads successfully?) so
# investigate doing this later.
```
This PR adds it by writing into the file random bytes and checking whether it throws an error when starting.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK c371cae07a7ba045130568b6abc470eaa4f95ef4
Tree-SHA512: d691eee60b91dd9d1b200588608f56b0a10dccd9761a75254b69e0ba5e5866cae14d2f90cb2bd7ec0f95b0617c2562cd33f20892ffd16355b6df770d3806a0ff
7e3d4f8e86e86f32d8911abd458b9e7c939ef3d5 test: add coverage to ensure the first arg of scantxoutset is needed (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Include a test that checks whether the first argument of scantxoutset RPC call "start" is required.
The rpc call should fail if the "start" argument is not provided.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 7e3d4f8e86e86f32d8911abd458b9e7c939ef3d5
Tree-SHA512: 6a456af9f3ccd5437be2edcd61936eb9f9c21ab926a6056c2c11b6b5121d1caca4e1f2ffd09015f9414af152c635a20e1da041eefdef980afbe8a0e8ccce07bd
4581a682d2d1fdd0e56fb4a56e6228be878a04a3 clarify processing of mempool-msgs when NODE_BLOOM (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Under which circumstances we process received 'mempool' P2P messages caused confusion in #27426. Rather than bike-shedding the formulation of the IF-statement, this adds a comment clarifying when we process the message. Also, correcting the `m_send_mempool` description.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 4581a682d2d1fdd0e56fb4a56e6228be878a04a3
willcl-ark:
ACK 4581a682d2
glozow:
ACK 4581a682d2d1fdd0e56fb4a56e6228be878a04a3
Tree-SHA512: 51ec673c3446b67c26f6c715430d0708b998b256260f5f5d0c034f271be8447d0bb8540dfd3879aa51904512fb26c9411766786c86287acff62d037a1df88855
65ba8a79a2919a0bd89f2f2d981e072d4f2f549d contrib: add ELF ABI check to symbol-check.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Check that the operating system ABI version embedded into the release binaries, is the version we expect it to be.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 65ba8a79a2919a0bd89f2f2d981e072d4f2f549d
TheCharlatan:
ACK 65ba8a79a2919a0bd89f2f2d981e072d4f2f549d
Tree-SHA512: 798d7c3b05183becf113a2ea13d889e18f1cec01d3cc279e64dbddede4d57f87444978f3f52c44bc5fdf0ba93d77c7c0be37aa815f93f348c35da45dc3d30ac2
9c18992bbaf649f8c5461d5e4dc39eb1a07ffc77 test: add coverage for `-bantime` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `-bantime`. This flag sets the time in seconds how long the IP is banned (in the case you don't explicitly set `bantime` when using `setban`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 9c18992bbaf649f8c5461d5e4dc39eb1a07ffc77
Tree-SHA512: e95f8608aa5df9b09cc5577daae662ed79ef5d5c69ee5e704d7c69520b9b51cc142e9e6be69d80356eda25a5215c4770b1a208638560c48cd3bc8f6d195a371f
33fdfc7986455191df8ce339261bc0561115cf7f test: perturb anchors.dat to test it doesn't throw an error during initialization (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Got some inspiration from `feature_init`. This PR tests whether perturbing `anchors.dat` doesn't throw any error during initialization.
3f1f5f6f1e/src/addrdb.cpp (L223-L235)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 33fdfc7986455191df8ce339261bc0561115cf7f
Tree-SHA512: e6584debb37647677581fda08366b45b42803022cc4c4f1d5a7bd5e9e04d64da77656dad2b804855337487bdcfc891f300a2e03668d6122de769dd14f39af9ed
cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189 test: add coverage for rpc error when trying to rescan beyond pruned data (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following rpc error:
15692e2641/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L896-L899)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189
aureleoules:
ACK cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189
Tree-SHA512: 724a055e9f6cddf1935699e8769015115f24f6485a0bd87e8660072ee44a15c1bddfdda848acc101ea7184b7e65a33b5b0d80b563d2ba3ecdab7a631378d6476
96bf0bca4a0e3aa0b7c07d8c225861e72f970fa9 test: simplify uint256 (de)serialization routines (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
These routines look fancy, but do nothing more than converting between byte objects of length 32 to/from integers in little endian byte order and can be replaced by simple one-liners, using the `int.{from,to}_bytes` methods (available since Python 3.2).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 96bf0bca4a0e3aa0b7c07d8c225861e72f970fa9
brunoerg:
crACK 96bf0bca4a0e3aa0b7c07d8c225861e72f970fa9
Tree-SHA512: f3031502d61a936147867ad8a0efa841a9bbdd2acf8781653036889a38524f4f1a5c86b1e07157bf2d9663097e7b84be6846678d0883d2a334beafd87e9510f0
4a3f1db4ea5f90277cf7f57c051a2285e8b42468 depends: latest config.sub (fanquake)
ac462c58f999ef1b9cd7d22c699dd189d3bb1e63 depends: latest config.guess (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Been a few years since we last updated these.
Also related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26422#issuecomment-1421178967.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 4a3f1db4ea5f90277cf7f57c051a2285e8b42468
hebasto:
ACK 4a3f1db4ea5f90277cf7f57c051a2285e8b42468, I've got zero diff with files from the [upstream](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;a=tree).
Tree-SHA512: 8f1af0813c56289c796a6e74965632dd6fa6dd135409250b2d5ebf7c1c2bfb4001195d35e5d7ecc0cad2a049468193b9fefc2b26beb7669afe6bba4d9c3ffa33
10a354f1740a5c1b913d0b6951e80fb5401ab43a test: prevent intermittent failures (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Follow up to #27214 - add an address to the tried table before the new table to make sure a new table collision is not possible.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 10a354f1740a5c1b913d0b6951e80fb5401ab43a - the fix is what I suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27214#discussion_r1169169601) and should make these intermittent failures impossible.
Tree-SHA512: 24099f02e1915395130065af0ef6a2a1893955d222517d156d928765541d9c427da00172a9b5a540163f4d6aae93ca3882e8267eeb35ecc595d42178abc6191c
d573e4ff86 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28084: doc: update windows `-fstack-clash-protection` doc (fanquake)
e3bbd1a46e Merge bitcoin-core/gui#740: Show own outputs on PSBT signing window (Hennadii Stepanov)
70cbd3f8a2 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28044: test: indexes, fix on error infinite loop (Ryan Ofsky)
551109105a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28036: test: Restore unlimited timeout in IndexWaitSynced (fanquake)
2767a13268 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28021: docs: fixup honggfuzz fuzz patch (fanquake)
af944b7c8d Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28013: doc: Fix verify-binaries link in contrib README (fanquake)
79a20f96a5 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27929: Added static_assert to check that base_blob is using whole bytes. (fanquake)
ece625c754 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27914: feerate: For GetFeePerK() return nSatoshisPerK instead of round trip through GetFee (fanquake)
ba5f4c0332 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27906: doc: test: update TestShell instructions (fanquake)
fbc6c6e644 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27875: build: make sure we can overwrite config.{guess,sub} before doing so (fanquake)
e2fcd1d947 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27225: doc: document json rpc endpoints (fanquake)
324db8bb31 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27603: test: added coverage to mining_basic.py (glozow)
a21b4b16f7 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27802: Update .style.yapf (fanquake)
ee6b7d66f1 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27721: depends: remove redundant stdlib option (fanquake)
f27778abe7 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27561: test: Explicitly specify directory where to search tests for (fanquake)
105442f8cb Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26422: build: Use newest `config.{guess,sub}` available (fanquake)
bef9631e99 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27661: doc, test: Document steps to reproduce TSan warning for `libdb` (fanquake)
277766fcef Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27493: depends: no-longer nuke libc++abi.so* in native_clang package (fanquake)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Batch of trivial backports
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK d573e4ff86
knst:
utACK d573e4ff86
Tree-SHA512: c94f55888de1758457a617253ddd13013141398438a32343ee10ee170d76b7e091ef4479e96f7983cb7661ceb99984a60a668ee142a9aea52b8c5305738398cc
4101fea620 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28304: doc: Remove confusing assert linter (fanquake)
c59cb158e5 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26282: wallet: have prune error take precedence over assumedvalid (fanquake)
e2e8598c5a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23997: wallet: avoid rescans under assumed-valid blocks (Andrew Chow)
b66eebe64d Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25599: build: Check for std::atomic::exchange rather than std::atomic_exchange (fanquake)
1204dc0f83 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25486: test: fix failing test `interface_usdt_utxocache.py` (MacroFake)
de17997621 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24062: refactor: replace RecursiveMutex `m_most_recent_block_mutex` with Mutex (MacroFake)
c91f010e0e Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25092: doc: various developer notes updates (MacroFake)
f39fcd1402 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24988: lint: Mention NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE in lint-assertions.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Batch of trivial backports
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 4101fea620
kwvg:
utACK 4101fea620
Tree-SHA512: e948ff58b256f2ecb9611681f773570d233985f1470e3eaa6899f3b7e53701c06f56ed5b965d250e22764938b0afebc8d85f92879ba111a0e20127cd63e99809
68faa87881f5334b2528db4adc72ec19d94316a3 test: use f-strings in mining_*.py tests (fanquake)
c2a5d560df2824df5731100c2584e8ad7a3d7bc2 test: use f-strings in interface_*.py tests (fanquake)
86d958262dff43002820d58ccb8958e2dbfb9d5b test: use f-strings in feature_proxy.py (fanquake)
31bdb33dcb8345df1bb94b28e811252a918d7dcb test: use f-strings in feature_segwit.py (fanquake)
b166d54c3cbb0c028210cee977b3dcde5ac5474f test: use f-strings in feature_versionbits_warning.py (fanquake)
cf6d66bf941d946600047d712c7cd15d7605322e test: use f-strings in feature_settings.py (fanquake)
6651d77f22862716f5bd7d0b31cfbd3937ab7b1d test: use f-strings in feature_pruning.py (fanquake)
961f5813ba65b6a601081912c4ece96c2679794d test: use f-strings in feature_notifications.py (fanquake)
1a546e6f6ca95772f0d7dbc2792477becbb8ea63 test: use f-strings in feature_minchainwork.py (fanquake)
6679eceacc915a8ea7cd7063f103ffc5eb9da884 test: use f-strings in feature_logging.py (fanquake)
fb633933ab570e945d2a366f37eeff39f516c613 test: use f-strings in feature_loadblock.py (fanquake)
e9ca8b254d4b9567831c0e113ce1c0a2b4795a95 test: use f-strings in feature_help.py (fanquake)
ff7e3309995a8960ac371741b2b00c6da40f7490 test: use f-strings in feature_filelock.py (fanquake)
d5a6adc5e478fa5c6e562377eea873dc38e66578 test: use f-strings in feature_fee_estimation.py (fanquake)
a2de33cbdc79202bccddb4beadfde88266ac979f test: use f-strings in feature_dersig.py (fanquake)
a2502cc63fd308be8af840962da9c53339433fa6 test: use f-strings in feature_dbcrash.py (fanquake)
3e2f84e7a96cb4b97b609ac853f78edd0ed43f82 test: use f-strings in feature_csv_activation.py (fanquake)
e2f1fd8ee92fa421b6d293169044d6ddd5a9b8df test: use f-strings in feature_config_args.py (fanquake)
36d33d32b1b498b61f56d552f6e2c1d064f978c3 test: use f-strings in feature_cltv.py (fanquake)
dca173cc044270b30782b1e3355e9dcb8c534295 test: use f-strings in feature_blocksdir.py (fanquake)
5453e8706278918ac51a725e81599cfa18c8cdbc test: use f-strings in feature_backwards_compatibility.py (fanquake)
6f3d5ad67ac8e7b50abae1a2949898d858e38106 test: use f-strings in feature_asmap.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Rather than using 3 different ways to build/format strings (sometimes all in the same test, i.e [`feature_config_args.py`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_config_args.py)), consolidate to using [f-strings (3.6+)](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#f-strings), which are generally more concise / readable, as well as more performant than existing methods.
This deals with the `feature_*.py`, `interface_*.py` and `mining_*.py` tests.
See also: [PEP 498](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0498/)
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
reACK 68faa87881f5334b2528db4adc72ec19d94316a3
Zero-1729:
crACK 68faa87881f5334b2528db4adc72ec19d94316a3
Tree-SHA512: d4e1a42e07d96d2c552387a46da1534223c4ce408703d7568ad2ef580797dd68d9695b8d19666b567af37f44de6e430e8be5db5d5404ba8fcecf9f5b026a6efb
fa6e6a3f03a38f8b431bf694268ed344d1815b3b doc: Remove confusing assert linter (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `assert()` documentation and linter are redundant and confusing:
* The source code already refuses to compile with `assert()` disabled.
* They violate the assumptions about `Assert()`, which *requires* side effects.
* The existing linter doesn't enforce the guideline, only checking for `++` and `--` side effects.
Fix all issues by removing the docs and the linter. See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26684#discussion_r1287370102
Going forward everyone is free to use whatever code in this regard they think is the easiest to read. Also, everyone is still free to share style-nits, if they think it is a good use of their time and of the pull request author. Finally, the author is still free to dismiss or ignore this style-nit, or any other style-nit.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa6e6a3f03a38f8b431bf694268ed344d1815b3b, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
theStack:
ACK fa6e6a3f03a38f8b431bf694268ed344d1815b3b
Tree-SHA512: 686738d71e1316cc95e5d3f71869b55a02bfb137c795cc0875057f4410e564bc8eff03c985a2087b007fb08fc84551c7da1e8b30c7a9c3f2b14e5e44a5970236
1c36bafc5f7db268546dcc86c793071a7e9d35e0 wallet: have prune error take precedence over assumedvalid (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23997#discussion_r891412739.
From Russ Yanofsky:
> Agree with all of Marco's points here and think this should be updated
>
> If havePrune and hasAssumedValidChain are both true, better to show havePrune error message. Assumed-valid error message is vague and not very actionable. Would suggest "Error loading wallet. Wallet requires blocks to be downloaded, and software does not currently support loading wallets while blocks are being downloaded out of order though assumeutxo snapshots. Wallet should be able to load successfully after node sync reaches height {block_height}"
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1c36bafc5f7db268546dcc86c793071a7e9d35e0
aureleoules:
ACK 1c36bafc5f7db268546dcc86c793071a7e9d35e0
Tree-SHA512: bfb0024bb962525cbbd392ade3c0331a8b0525e7f2f2ab52b2dbb9b6dd6311070d85ecb762a7689db84a30991971865698ab6fec187206e6a92133790c5a91dc
817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411 wallet: avoid rescans if under the snapshot (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of assumed-valid blocks.
Of course in live code right now, `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` block index entries don't exist since they're a unique flag introduced by the use of UTXO snapshots, so this is prophylactic code exercised only by unittests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411. This seems like the simplest change we can make to avoid wallet problems when an assumeutxo snapshot is loaded.
Tree-SHA512: cfa44b2eb33d1818d30df45210d0dde1e9b78cc9b7c88cb985054dc28427bba9e0905debe4196065d1d3a5ce7bca7e605e629d5ce5f0225b25395746e6d3d596
4de4221ab4b645ff77503c777c9b195a962e9fa1 build: Check for std::atomic::exchange rather than std::atomic_exchange (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Our usage of std::atomic is with it's own exchange function, not std::atomic_exchange. So we should be looking specifically for that function.
This removes the need for -latomic for riscv builds, which resolves a guix cross architecture reproducibility issue.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 4de4221ab4b645ff77503c777c9b195a962e9fa1
fanquake:
ACK 4de4221ab4b645ff77503c777c9b195a962e9fa1
Tree-SHA512: dd8225fc9c6a335601f611700003d0249b9ef941efa502db39306129677929d013048e9221be1d6d7f0ea2d90313d4b87de239f441be21b25bea40a6c19a031e
