cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06 qt: Use template function qOverload in signal-slot connections (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A nice template function [`qOverload`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtglobal.html#qOverload) is available for us now (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20413, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21286).
Its usage makes code much more readable.
This PR does not change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
utACK cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06.
promag:
Code review ACK cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06.
Tree-SHA512: 72002aa646b1a79bab62d498825b3f245dc7ebdc189280f8bd3b4076e1bb50be8802c02bc872ff6f70c1ea81faec66d3bec36471119dd98c9e70d87b990396ae
5a4a15d2b4456272fd8aa080195f40a09576ae01 qt, refactor: Drop no longer used PeerTableModel::getRowByNodeId func (Hennadii Stepanov)
9a9f180df0d51396fee2468681df6dd935b0248e qt, refactor: Drop no longer used PeerTableModel::sort function (Hennadii Stepanov)
778a64af209e4fa692a3aca8376ba1bd5e1af881 qt: Use PeerTableSortProxy for sorting peer table (Hennadii Stepanov)
df2d165ba9e0acc53f36a326f68f57ad9c297872 qt: Add peertablesortproxy module (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The "Peers" table in the "Node" window does not hold multiple selection after sorting.
This PR introduces a `QSortFilterProxyModel` subclass, that is a standard Qt [practice](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/model-view-programming.html#custom-sorting-models) for such cases.
Now the sorting code is encapsulated into the dedicated Qt class, and we do not need to maintain it.
Fixes#283 (additionally).
---
On **master** (7ae86b3c6845873ca96650fc69beb4ae5285c801):
- rows are sorted by "Ping", and a selection is made
- rows are sorted by "NodeId", and the previous selection is _lost_
With **this PR**:
- rows are sorted by "Ping", and a selection is made
- rows are sorted by "NodeId", and the row are still selected
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
re-ACK 5a4a15d2b4456272fd8aa080195f40a09576ae01, tested on macOS 11.2 Qt 5.15.2 after rebase
promag:
Tested ACK 5a4a15d2b4456272fd8aa080195f40a09576ae01.
Tree-SHA512: f81c1385892fbf1a46ffb98b42094ca1cc97da52114bbbc94fedb553899b1f18c26a349e186bba6e27922a89426bd61e8bc88b1f7832512dbe211b5f834e076e
16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672 qt, refactor: Use better QMenu::addAction overloaded function (Hennadii Stepanov)
79311750b58d650d49a3f0edd59d31dd132ab8c0 qt: Do not assign Alt+<KEY> shortcuts to context menu actions (Hennadii Stepanov)
963e12058f3ca3cdaeefd9aa5a8305fa41afd1a0 qt: Drop menu separator that separates nothing (Hennadii Stepanov)
1398a6536c710368d9f1d0cf6e280fe63d07c9f0 qt, refactor: Make AddressBookPage::deleteAction a local variable (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
1. removes useless `Alt` + `<KEY>` shortcuts from context menu items
2. replaces 3 lines of code with the only call of [`QMenu::addAction`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qmenu.html#addAction-5) for each context menu item (it became possible since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21286 was merged)
3. makes other minor cleanups
No behavior change.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672
promag:
Code review ACK 16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672. Nice code cleanup that takes advantage of more recent Qt API.
jarolrod:
ACK 16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672
Tree-SHA512: e5555fe957058cc67b351aaf9f09fe3635edb2d07a2223d3093913a25607ae538f0a2fde84c0b0cd43e7475b248949548eb4a5d4b21d8f7391fa2fa8541c04ff
8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0 gui: correct replacement of amp character in the wallet name for QMenu (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
In the current implementation Qt uses '&' as a signal to underscore letter and use it as a hot-key, which is not expected for case of wallet name.
The [comment in the code](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30446/files#diff-2ecf8cbf369cf3d2f3d2b1cf5cfe4c1a647d63e11e2885d2fd0ac11fb5f7a804L402-L404) regarding the use of an "&" on a menu item is misleading.
If a wallet name has an "&" in it, it is not supposed to be interpreted as a hot-key, but it should be shown as it is without replacing it to an underscore.
See screenshots before & after:
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0.
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0. Tested on Ubuntu 22.04 using Qt version 5.15.3
Tree-SHA512: 918c2c05555d203a8b203794c138651d4a1691a05a858631d5a4664b78e150402d1ae4a02ee5181f63a5b22a09badca0a4ea14a626f45f8cbe557226c308b8c5
f22ade31b9 tests: more strict test for withrawal 1000 and minor improvements (UdjinM6)
4ad18f64f5 fix: properly test hard limit of 1000 dash (Konstantin Akimov)
a2fe2b27d9 test: minor improvements for credit pool functional test (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
DIP for Credit Pool says:
```
The withdrawal should not be mined if:
* It requests more DASH than the credit pool contains
* It requests more than 1000 DASH
* The credit pool contains more than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than a 10% reduction in the credit pool over the 576-block window
* The credit pool contains less than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than 100 DASH being removed from the pool over the 576-block window
```
Though, current functional test for asset locks improperly test this case, because threshold for big withdrawal happens by 10%, not 1000 dash.
## What was done?
Improvements for functional asset lock test to actually test a limit 1000 dash, not just 10%
## How Has This Been Tested?
See changes
## Breaking Changes
N/A, changes only for tests
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK f22ade31b9
Tree-SHA512: 2fdbfa85a3fc41683d68d1577916178ad686ccf0fba6abb22dc84a7ad69e0d44f876e371a24935c5167baa5491000662cc98cc1cd205e3817f0ffc65d2b4953d
b73f48f3b9 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22057: test: use MiniWallet (P2PK mode) for feature_dersig.py (MarcoFalke)
d5a8d5e6a0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22048: test: MiniWallet: introduce enum type for output mode (MarcoFalke)
f4cd20b115 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21945: test: add P2PK support to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
7be6db6dca docs: add an explanation for vsize in MiniWallet (Konstantin Akimov)
5d10b41302 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21840: test: Misc refactor to get rid of &foo[0] raw pointers (MarcoFalke)
7522ee9868 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21900: test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (MarcoFalke)
c6f603c26f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21897: rpc: adjust incorrect RPCHelpMan types (MarcoFalke)
1dffe3ab9f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21867: test: use MiniWallet for p2p_blocksonly.py (MarcoFalke)
81d21eea14 Merge #21557: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests (MarcoFalke)
cc169c2457 partial Merge #20842: docs: consolidate typo & url fixing (MarcoFalke)
2be1604405 Merge #20459: rpc: Fail to return undocumented return values (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Backports from v22 bitcoin.
Mostly related to MiniWallet and RPC improvements, see commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK b73f48f3b9
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b73f48f3b9
Tree-SHA512: 588f3a30697c0d77dadcc463aba71a00bf26eeef41b0cb8b9197799a217ebeb1d1ce7b5021ccc4576f0e9ca0e75ad840820cdc682fe8f120596788a528727a0b
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
56cc39d178 chore: bump version to 21.0.2 (pasta)
5619c8f5fd docs: add release notes for v21.0.1 and archive v21.0.0 (pasta)
9e80d128c0 Merge #6163: fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (pasta)
e10c5c9579 Merge #6160: feat: add sbom and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0c11f0e99b8542df013021bed639e86e188b6a20;
kwvg:
utACK 0c11f0e99b
Tree-SHA512: c8f81678ba9a742b3e1a674ffc291e30d63900fd1e1328bf5528210d0a983b9c5c9b3960ce76fd6ed8fd7014a92e09dcfa093bcd7a4bad2e3ea2d5e849ee28bc
56cc39d178 chore: bump version to 21.0.2 (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
my bad... forgot
## What was done?
Bump version in configure.ac
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 56cc39d178
Tree-SHA512: 7f85d3521e7a264d212a678a3e7ac6d39fceeee209433a02f3c05dcd9dec28ce2893e75a7754331d913ec8215ddda205cf0fbc5c0e0c02eb1afeb899635f29f5
5619c8f5fd docs: add release notes for v21.0.1 and archive v21.0.0 (pasta)
9e80d128c0 Merge #6163: fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (pasta)
e10c5c9579 Merge #6160: feat: add sbom and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Backport PRs for v21.0.1
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
See CI
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
kwvg:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
UdjinM6:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
Tree-SHA512: 42c1e31319775e5800da2d82af00cae3aa0cee3baadd0123a809efc246d4ca5d0e6a4166b574e6ddebf66c0a80f4ee1655caff085f1687bb533889414a9fd4cf
3468ab34d1 fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mobile client (without full blockchain) can't receive transactions before they are mined in the block.
## What was done?
Fixed a condition "is an addr relay" to "not a block relay".
It's an alternate solution for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6162
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested with hashengineering - it works!
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK [3468ab3](3468ab34d1); no diff
kwvg:
utACK 3468ab34d1
Tree-SHA512: 6ad257a72be0f2fd4d7a8e3674d537e2a2c5f0c7c1bdfdf825403d8cb2975261bcf4574949fb02a16de76762d3f30b40e094be448cfa4ee6bae9f1f5be5f44d5
9178e8a75f feat: add smob and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Docker provenance refers to the origin and history of Docker images, including how they were built, modified, and by whom. An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a detailed list of all components in a software application, providing transparency about libraries, dependencies, and versions used, which is crucial for security and compliance.
## What was done?
Add SBOM and provenance to docker build; this may allow some level of validation that GitHub actions is actually doing what it says it is.
See this for more information https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/attestations/
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building with buildx with sbom and provenance flags locally
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 9178e8a75f
Tree-SHA512: 6e3f35a0b30f002e2d5d80d6dd18ee554a1c15c62c1d4cbe1185f38977f55a199998515cf5bb9a027670f068f3d56ef33faa062d8c4122a886375d00afe6bf2f
3468ab34d1 fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mobile client (without full blockchain) can't receive transactions before they are mined in the block.
## What was done?
Fixed a condition "is an addr relay" to "not a block relay".
It's an alternate solution for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6162
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested with hashengineering - it works!
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK [3468ab3](3468ab34d1); no diff
kwvg:
utACK 3468ab34d1
Tree-SHA512: 6ad257a72be0f2fd4d7a8e3674d537e2a2c5f0c7c1bdfdf825403d8cb2975261bcf4574949fb02a16de76762d3f30b40e094be448cfa4ee6bae9f1f5be5f44d5
9178e8a75f feat: add smob and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Docker provenance refers to the origin and history of Docker images, including how they were built, modified, and by whom. An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a detailed list of all components in a software application, providing transparency about libraries, dependencies, and versions used, which is crucial for security and compliance.
## What was done?
Add SBOM and provenance to docker build; this may allow some level of validation that GitHub actions is actually doing what it says it is.
See this for more information https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/attestations/
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building with buildx with sbom and provenance flags locally
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 9178e8a75f
Tree-SHA512: 6e3f35a0b30f002e2d5d80d6dd18ee554a1c15c62c1d4cbe1185f38977f55a199998515cf5bb9a027670f068f3d56ef33faa062d8c4122a886375d00afe6bf2f
764b3a3239 test: disable mocktime in p2p_eviction.py (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
No idea why CI has no issues but `p2p_eviction.py` fails locally after #6103 (my guess is that it's because P2PInterface can't work with mocktime properly).
## What was done?
Disable mocktime in `p2p_eviction.py`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests locally
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a9be9032c7697ff47b2256395f0fb126deeccd9bee6f101a71a1f88e1f25b08fa039ed5eb4cd4b1b308e8136d64510a544b7019ed9147ea2e80f8cb83ff25412
e775b74d5e docs: add release notes for 6147 (pasta)
127a4d23a5 feat: aim to have 2 onion connections when possible, guard them from eviction (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In the past I've noticed that even when using `-proxy` over tor, I wouldn't actually gain any onion connections over time. This is even worse when using -onion. Sure it may expose an onion service, but you wouldn't gain any onion connections (in my experience)!
The goal here is to minimize easy-ish censorship and improve network-wide resistance to partitioning. It is not unimaginable that port 9999 could be blocked at large scale. This could potentially result in severe partitioning, and subsequent issues. In an attempt to avoid this, we should always try to have at least 2 outbound onion connections when at all possible. Hopefully this also makes onion addresses gossip better.
This also adds a benefit of p2p encryption for these peers. As a result, there is improved plausible deniability that you produced a transaction, as it is possible you received it over onion and simply rebroadcast it over ipv4.
I don't think there is any real downside to this patch, stuff like masternode / quorum connections will still always happen over ipv4, but with this, blocks and transactions would continue to propogate across the network even if (non-onion) ipv4 traffic was all dropped.
Arguably, it's not **ideal** to send so much traffic over tor, but hopefully as latency is higher, we will generally receive messages over ipv4 first and therefor not request them over the onion connections.
## What was done?
We will always try to get 2 onion nodes (full or block only); and guard them from eviction
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run a node; see over time that you start with 0 onion nodes, and over time you progress to having two of them!
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: cd15565751ae845302c71cac084ffba66340033d379ffa78d0aa6fa4ad8f65ddeccd55fa623dfaf7daeed5e38b5b2ec27683991275cf2b6edfbd8e114a1bfe60
In the past I've noticed that even when using `-proxy` over tor, I wouldn't actually gain any onion connections over time. This is even worse when using -onion. Sure it may expose an onion service, but you wouldn't gain any onion connections!
The goal here is to minimize easy-ish censorship and improve network-wide resistance to partitioning. It is not unimaginable that port 9999 could be blocked at large scale. This could potentially result in severe partitioning, and subsequent issues. In an attempt to avoid this, we should always try to have at least 2 outbound onion connections when at all possible. Hopefully this also makes onion addresses gossip better.
I don't think there is any real downside to this patch, stuff like masternode / quorum connections will still always happen over ipv4, but with this, blocks and transactions would continue to propogate across the network even if (non-onion) ipv4 traffic was all dropped.
This also adds a benefit of p2p encryption for these peers. As a result, there is improved plausible deniability that you produced a transaction, as it is possible you received it over onion and simply rebroadcast it over ipv4.
Arguably, it's not **ideal** to send so much traffic over tor, but hopefully as latency is higher, we will generally receive messages over ipv4 first and therefor not request them over the onion connections.
98a33939fd chore: set release to true (pasta)
cd0a3a6cc6 Merge #6154: chore: remove trailing whitespaces in release notes (pasta)
6bc60a7236 Merge #6151: chore: update seeds for v21 release (pasta)
88e949aa1b Merge #6146: chore: bump assumevalid, minchainwork, checkpoints, chaintxdata (pasta)
cc14427ccd Merge #6144: docs: release notes for v21.0.0 (pasta)
0a8ece1fd2 Merge #6122: chore: translations 2024-07 (pasta)
146d24401f Merge #6140: feat: harden all sporks on mainnet to current values (pasta)
024d272eb9 Merge #6126: feat: enable EHF activation of MN_RR on mainnet (pasta)
e780b3d48d Merge #6125: docs: update manpages for 21.0 (pasta)
5ede23c2ba Merge #6118: docs: add release notes notifying change of default branch to `develop` (pasta)
1b6fe9c720 Merge #6117: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
27d20beda8 Merge #6116: fix: mitigate crashes associated with some upgradetohd edge cases (pasta)
db828177bf Merge #6106: feat: create new composite quorum-command platformsign (pasta)
a45e6df58b Merge #6104: fix: adjust incorrect parameter description that says there is a default that doesn't exist (pasta)
7330982631 Merge #6100: feat: make whitelist works with composite commands for platform needs (pasta)
9998ffd92b Merge #6096: feat: split type of error in submitchainlock - return enum in CL verifying code (pasta)
cdf7a25012 Merge #6095: fix: createwallet to require 'load_on_startup' for descriptor wallets (pasta)
c1c2c55690 Merge #6092: fix: mixing for partially unlocked descriptor wallets (pasta)
117548660d Merge #6073: feat: add logging for RPC HTTP requests: command, user, http-code, time of running (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Suppressed changes from be83865959 so the diff is empty.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
ACK 158cf86795bbcf27a5ee7ccc4fd8072c8db05c4c; no diff
knst:
ACK 158cf86795
Tree-SHA512: 3310a39fbcb45bdf09f885fe77ba769c0a715869a3bb287eaf0f2cf54b35a7e1f832c88df3bd31097eabf2d375515c1b87ff05e0c3282cef642833a154c42bbe
fa44f5119a0b412f0d46cad02f638727d140b451 ci: Clarify that previous_releases task is using DEBUG (MarcoFalke)
fad0f21c3caba129106799fe6c14aff323ef99f2 ci: Use clang in multiprocess task to avoid OOM (MarcoFalke)
faeabef4f386009847a0f91041d44e6f31eec618 ci: Enable D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG for multiprocess task (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Enable `-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG` via the depends `DEBUG` flag. Also `--enable-debug` to get debug symbols in traces.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa44f5119a0b412f0d46cad02f638727d140b451, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged, and CI is green.
Tree-SHA512: ab2a216bb44ee462f9dd181ec9025962502bd4201a1118ff52b6a193398e7ea3ca465a45a5eb341e308758fc3ef34ea3521f8a1f85ed64478ef3c1f6c1b8b141
fac96d026511f22f0202ce3631a38be0e990555f p2p: Limit m_block_inv_mutex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Keeping the lock longer than needed is confusing to reviewers and thread analysis. For example, keeping the lock while appending tx-invs, which requires the mempool lock, will tell thread analysis tools an incorrect lock order of `(1) m_block_inv_mutex, (2) pool.cs`.
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
crACK fac96d026511f22f0202ce3631a38be0e990555f
jnewbery:
utACK fac96d026511f22f0202ce3631a38be0e990555f
theStack:
Code-Review ACK fac96d026511f22f0202ce3631a38be0e990555f
Tree-SHA512: fcfac0f1f8b16df7522513abf716b2eed3d2fc9153f231c8cb61f451e342f29c984a5c872deca6bab3e601e5d651874cc229146c9370e46811b4520747a21f2b
9096b13a4764873511b65f32a005ce4738b0d81c net: remove unnecessary check of CNode::cs_vSend (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
It is not possible to have a node in `CConnman::vNodesDisconnected` and
its reference count to be incremented - all `CNode::AddRef()` are done
either before the node is added to `CConnman::vNodes` or while holding
`CConnman::cs_vNodes` and the object being in `CConnman::vNodes`.
So, the object being in `CConnman::vNodesDisconnected` and its reference
count being zero means that it is not and will not start to be used by
other threads.
So, the lock of `CNode::cs_vSend` in `CConnman::DisconnectNodes()` will
always succeed and is not necessary.
Indeed all locks of `CNode::cs_vSend` are done either when the reference
count is >0 or under the protection of `CConnman::cs_vNodes` and the
node being in `CConnman::vNodes`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9096b13a4764873511b65f32a005ce4738b0d81c 🏧
jnewbery:
utACK 9096b13a4764873511b65f32a005ce4738b0d81c
Tree-SHA512: 910899cdcdc8934642eb0c40fcece8c3b01b7e20a0b023966b9d6972db6a885cb3a9a04e9562bae14d5833967e45e2ecb3687b94d495060c3da4b1f2afb0ac8f
84934bf70e11fe4cda1cfda60113a54895d4fdd5 multiprocess: Add echoipc RPC method and test (Russell Yanofsky)
7d76cf667eff512043a28d4407cc89f58796c42b multiprocess: Add comments and documentation (Russell Yanofsky)
ddf7ecc8dfc64cf121099fb047e1ac871de94f4c multiprocess: Add bitcoin-node process spawning support (Russell Yanofsky)
10afdf0280fa93bfffb0a7665c60dc155cd84514 multiprocess: Add Ipc interface implementation (Russell Yanofsky)
745c9cebd50fea1664efef571dc1ee1bddc96102 multiprocess: Add Ipc and Init interface definitions (Russell Yanofsky)
5d62d7f6cd48bbc4e9f37ecc369f38d5e1e0036c Update libmultiprocess library (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
This PR adds basic process spawning and IPC method call support to `bitcoin-node` executables built with `--enable-multiprocess`[*].
These changes are used in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102 to let node, gui, and wallet functionality run in different processes, and extended in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19460 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19461 after that to allow gui and wallet processes to be started and stopped independently and connect to the node over a socket.
These changes can also be used to implement new functionality outside the `bitcoin-node` process like external indexes or pluggable transports (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18988). The `Ipc::spawnProcess` and `Ipc::serveProcess` methods added here are entry points for spawning a child process and serving a parent process, and being able to make bidirectional, multithreaded method calls between the processes. A simple example of this is implemented in commit "Add echoipc RPC method and test."
Changes in this PR aside from the echo test were originally part of #10102, but have been split and moved here for easier review, and so they can be used for other applications like external plugins.
Additional notes about this PR can be found at https://bitcoincore.reviews/19160
[*] Note: the `--enable-multiprocess` feature is still experimental, and not enabled by default, and not yet supported on windows. More information can be found in [doc/multiprocess.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/multiprocess.md)
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 84934bf70e11fe4cda1cfda60113a54895d4fdd5
ariard:
ACK 84934bf. Changes since last ACK fixes the silent merge conflict about `EnsureAnyNodeContext()`. Rebuilt and checked again debug command `echoipc`.
Tree-SHA512: 52a948b5e18a26d7d7a09b83003eaae9b1ed2981978c36c959fe9a55abf70ae6a627c4ff913a3428be17400a3dace30c58b5057fa75c319662c3be98f19810c6
3e05a57297ddc9c55604a41e50a7a94d220db7ee test: use MiniWallet (P2PK mode) for feature_dersig.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_dersig.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled. A valid DER-signature is created by using the recently introduced P2PK-Mode of the MiniWallet (#21945).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 3e05a57297ddc9c55604a41e50a7a94d220db7ee
Tree-SHA512: 0fb8da8ed8b47f68bcb57301eb4f0171a6c9e44539b7554626969347e5d6f80b3b9085f2cc160cd038a990f0d81b8b614846260fbed43b5f950d77f1b7aa81cf
6cebac598e5e85eadd60eb1274d7f33d63ce1108 test: MiniWallet: introduce enum type for output mode (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #21945 which lifted the number of MiniWallet's tx output modes from 2 to 3 (by adding P2PK Support).
Since the current way of specifying the mode on the ctor via two booleans is ugly and error-prone (see table in comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21945#issuecomment-842526575), a new Enum type `MiniWalletMode` is introduced that can hold the following values:
- ADDRESS_OP_TRUE
- RAW_OP_TRUE
- RAW_P2PK
Also adds documentation that should guide the user on which mode is useful for what etc. with a summary table. (Can also be split up in a separate commit or shortened if that is desired, maybe it's considered to be too verbose).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 6cebac598e5e85eadd60eb1274d7f33d63ce1108
Tree-SHA512: cbbc10806d9d9e62829548094415e9f1a281cd247b9a9fc7f7f33b923c723aa03e7bc3024623a77fb1f7da4d73455fa8244840f746980d32acdad97ee12100da
4bea30169218e2f21e0c93a059966b41c8edd205 test: use P2PK-MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dc7eb64e83f5b8e63f12729d5f77b1c920b136e4 test: MiniWallet: add P2PK support (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds support for creating and spending transactions with raw pubkey (P2PK) outputs to MiniWallet, [as suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21900#discussion_r629524841). Using that mode in the test `feature_csv_activation.py`, all txs submitted to the mempool follow the standard policy, i.e. `-acceptnonstdtxn=1` can be removed.
Possible follow-ups:
* Improve MiniWallet constructor Interface; an enum-like parameter instead of two booleans would probably be better
* Look at other tests that could benefit from P2PK (e.g. feature_cltv.py?)
* Check vsize also for P2PK txs (vsize varies due to signature, i.e. a range has to be asserted)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4bea30169218e2f21e0c93a059966b41c8edd205
Tree-SHA512: 9b428e6b7cfde59a8c7955d5096cea88af1384a5f49723f00052e9884d819d952d20a5ab39bb02f9d8b6073769c44462aa265d84a33e33da33c2d21670c488a6
bd7f27d16dacf6f7de3b4f6bd052def41d9601be refactor: feature_csv_activation.py: move tx helper functions to methods (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2eca46b0aa0ecf4738500b53523d7013985b387d test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_csv_activation.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled by using the new MiniWallet instead, as proposed in #20078.
Short reviewers guideline:
- Since we exclusively work with anyone-can-spend outputs here (raw scriptPubKey = OP_TRUE), signing is not needed anymore. The function `sign_transaction` and its calls are removed, after changing a tx (e.g. its scriptSig or nVersion) a simple `.rehash()` call is sufficient. Also, generating an address `self.nodeaddress` (and with that, passing it to the the various test tx creation/sending helper methods) is not needed anymore and removed.
- The test repeatedly uses the same input for creating different txs (e.g. with different txversions 1 and 2). To let `MiniWallet` create a tx with a specific input, we have to call `.get_utxo()` before which also marks the UTXO as spent. The method is changed to also support keeping the UTXO in its internal list (`mark_as_spent=False`). With the behaviour on master, the second call to `.get_utxo()` with the same input would fail.
- To keep the diff in the first commit short, the `miniwallet` is set as a global variable, to avoid passing it on every tx creation/spending helper. The global is eliminated in the second (refactoring) commit, where all the helpers are moved to the test class as methods. By that, we can use `self.nodes[0]` directly in the helpers and don't have to pass it again and again. I think there could still be a lot of improvements/refactoring done in the test, but that should hopefully serve as a good basis.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bd7f27d16dacf6f7de3b4f6bd052def41d9601be
MarcoFalke:
review ACK bd7f27d16dacf6f7de3b4f6bd052def41d9601be 🐕
Tree-SHA512: 24fb6a0f7702bae40d5271d197119827067d4b597e954d182e4c1aa5d0fa870368eb3ffed469b26713fa8ff8eb3ecc06abc80b2449cd68156d5559e7ae8a2b11
7031721f2cc3eef30c46ff50c52328e9ba8090e0 rpc/listaddressgroupings: redefine inner-most array as ARR_FIXED (Karl-Johan Alm)
8500f7bf54d3e27fd2fa7fda15ad833f5688c331 rpc/createrawtransaction: redefine addresses as OBJ_USER_KEYS (Karl-Johan Alm)
d9e2183c50f50465b9f173171fee240949bf8bd2 rpc: include OBJ_USER_KEY in RPCArg constructor checks (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This PR adjusts the two issues I encountered while developing a tool that converts RPCHelpMan objects into bindings for other language(s).
The first is in createrawtransaction, where the address part, e.g. bc1qabc in
> createrawtransaction '[]' '[{"bc1qabc": 1.0}]'
is declared as a `Type::OBJ`, when in reality it should be a `Type::OBJ_USER_KEYS`, defined as such:
5925f1e652/src/rpc/util.h (L126)
(coincidentally, this is the first and only (afaict) usage of this `RPCArg::Type`).
The second is in the `listaddressgroupings` RPC, which returns an array of arrays of arrays, where the innermost one is a tuple-thingie with an optional 3rd item; this is an `ARR_FIXED`, not an `ARR`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7031721f2cc3eef30c46ff50c52328e9ba8090e0 🐀
Tree-SHA512: 769377416c6226d1738a956fb685498e009f9e7eb2d45bc679b81c5364b9520fdbcb49392c937ab45598aa0d33589e8e6a59ccc101cf8d8e7dfdafd58d4eefd0
9f767e84381d678ed24e3f7f981976f9da34971e test: use MiniWallet for p2p_blocksonly.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (p2p_blocksonly.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled by using the new MiniWallet instead, as proposed in #20078.
Note that MiniWallet creates segwit transactions by default, i.e. txid and wtxid are not identical and we have to return both from `check_p2p_tx_violation(...)`: wtxid is needed to match an expected `"received getdata for: wtx ..."` debug output, whereas the txid is needed to wait for a certain tx via `wait_for_tx(...)`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 9f767e84381d678ed24e3f7f981976f9da34971e tested with `--disable-wallet`
Tree-SHA512: f08001f02c3c310ccdf713af0ba17304368a36414f412749908bbe8c03ad1e902190b8768b79f3b4909855762f285e7ab1b627cc4f45c90b42bb097a43cb4318
BACKPORT NOTICE:
missing changes in src/test/validation_tests.cpp (signet)
1112035d32ffe73a4522226c8cb2f6a5878d3ada doc: fix various typos (Ikko Ashimine)
e8640849c775efcf202dbd34736fed8d61379c49 doc: Use https URLs where possible (Sawyer Billings)
Pull request description:
Consolidates / fixes the changes from #20762, #20836, #20810. There is no output when `test/lint/lint-all.sh` is run.
Closes#20807.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1112035d32ffe73a4522226c8cb2f6a5878d3ada
Tree-SHA512: 22ca824688758281a74e5ebc6a84a358142351434e34c88c6b36045d2d241ab95fd0958565fd2060f98317e62e683323b5320cc7ec13592bf340e6922294ed78
fa8192f42e1d24444f1d0433c96dbce1adf76967 rpc: Fail to return undocumented return values (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently a few return values are undocumented. This is causing confusion at the least. See for example #18476
Fix this by treating it as an internal bug to return undocumented return values.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa8192f42e1d24444f1d0433c96dbce1adf76967. Only changes: rebase, no const_cast suggestion, and tostring cleanups needed after suggestion
Tree-SHA512: c006905639bafe3045de152b00c34d9864731becb3c4f468bdd61a392f10d7e7cd89a54862c8daa8c11ac4eea0eb5f13b0f647d21e21a0a797b54191cff7238c
