fa92af5af39a08982f785542df5419d6d5a4706d ci: Run feature_block and feature_abortnode in valgrind (MarcoFalke)
fa01febeaf801bade77a613e64f18b556ae16d86 test: Remove ci timeout restriction in test_runner (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also revert commit 0a4912e46a, because some tests take too long for this to be useful anymore.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 363f14766e1f4a5860ab668a516b41acebc6fbdf11d8defb3a95a772dbf82304ca1f5f14b1dbad97f2029503e03d92e8c69df0466a8872409c20665838f617ed
2d23082cbe4641175d752a5969f67cdadf1afcea bump test timeouts so that functional tests run in valgrind (Micky Yun Chan)
Pull request description:
ci/tests: Bump timeouts so all functional tests run on travis in valgrind #17763
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 5a8c6e2ea02b715facfcb58c761577be15ae58c45a61654beb98c2c2653361196c2eec521bcae4a9a1bab8e409d6807de771ef4c46d3d05996ae47a22d499d54
1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Simply avoiding the hardcoded string in more places for consistency.
It can also allow for more easily reusing tests for other chains other than regtest.
Separated from #8994 .
Continues #16509 .
It is still not complete (ie to be complete, we need the -chain parameter in #16680 and make whether acceptnonstdtxs is allowed for that chain or not customizable for regtest [or for custom chains like in #8994 ] ). But while being incomplete like #16509 , it's quite simple to review and another step forward IMO.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 1abcecc. I think it's an improvement even if incomplete and if some PR's might accidentally bring "regtest" back. Subsequent improvements hopefully don't have to touch 16 files.
elichai:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
Tree-SHA512: 5620de6dab235ca8bd8670d6366c7b9f04f0e3ca9c5e7f87765b38e16ed80c17d7d1630c0d5fd7c5526f070830d94dc74cc2096d8ede87dc7180ed20569509ee
a47df13471e3168e2e02023fb20cdf2414141b36 [qa] Test disconnect block failure -> shutdown (Suhas Daftuar)
4433ed0f730cfd60eeba3694ff3c283ce2c0c8ee [validation] Crash if disconnecting a block fails (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
If we're unable to disconnect a block during normal operation, then that is a
failure of our local system (such as disk failure) or the chain that we are on
(eg CVE-2018-17144), but cannot be due to failure of the (more work) chain that
we're trying to validate.
We should abort rather than stay on a less work chain.
Fixes#14341.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
utACK a47df13471e3168e2e02023fb20cdf2414141b36
TheBlueMatt:
utACK a47df13471e3168e2e02023fb20cdf2414141b36. Didn't bother to review the test in detail, it looked fine. Debated whether invalidateblock should ever crash the node, but *not* crashing in the case of hitting a pruned block (which is the only change here) is clearly better, even if there are other cases I'd argue we should crash in.
ryanofsky:
utACK a47df13471e3168e2e02023fb20cdf2414141b36. Only change since last review is new comment.
promag:
ACK a47df1347, it takes awhile to quit (RPC connection timeouts) but that's unrelated - hope to fix that soon.
fanquake:
ACK a47df13471e3168e2e02023fb20cdf2414141b36
Tree-SHA512: 4dec8cef6e7dbbe513c138fc5821a7ceab855e603ece3c16185b51a3830ab7ebbc844a28827bf64e75326f45325991dcb672f13bd7baede53304f27289c4af8d
