External logic should not be able to mutate the CActiveMasternodeManager
state (i.e. CActiveMasternodeInfo). Access is brokered through getter
functions.
A later commit will be moving activeMasternodeInfo into activeMasternodeManager
and that is only conditionally initialized if the node is in masternode
mode, which will render access attempts outside of masternode mode invalid.
We need to adjust behaviour to account for that.
915e34112b5a4c2ef391d7e3706603bcd6f62a2a qt: fix issue when disabling the auto-enabled blank wallet checkbox (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
As detailed by #151, On `master` a user can create the confusing scenario where you have a disabled `Encrypt Wallet` checkbox and a selected `Disable Private Keys` checkbox after unselecting the auto-enabled `Blank Wallet` checkbox.
This commit makes it so that when the `Blank Wallet` checkbox is auto-selected after the user selects `Disable Private keys`, unselecting it will also unselect the `Disable Private Keys` checkbox, which in turn re-enables the `Encrypt Wallet` checkbox.
Below are screenshots comparing the behavior of selecting `Disable Private Keys` then unselecting the `Blank Wallet` between `master` and this `PR`:
**Master:**
| Select `Disable Private Keys` | Unselect `Blank Wallet` |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|  |  |
**PR:**
| Select `Disable Private Keys` | Unselect `Blank Wallet` |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|  |  |
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 915e34112b5a4c2ef391d7e3706603bcd6f62a2a
Talkless:
ACK 915e34112b5a4c2ef391d7e3706603bcd6f62a2a
Tree-SHA512: ce6ecbc35b94a08cabf0b8a24dbdfc874d82cc8918cc8623dce8172c7fc9c75d63a13b036bae5f7ab2c090f8d020574a542285d1651600813faf5d91e2506a8d
173ef8980d921c9c0e46257747ab1165965e3ced build: Small libxcb.mk improvements (Hennadii Stepanov)
5129b36573cb07d8bcbac493506c46e26d7239eb build: Clean remnants of QTBUG-34748 fix (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Hope, this PR will make [transit](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21376) to Qt 5.12.10 neater.
A fix for [QTBUG-34748](https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-34748) was introduced in #5915 (v0.11.0, Qt 5.2.1).
[QTBUG-34748](https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-34748) was [fixed](b19b080894) in Qt 5.3.0.
The separated [`fix-xcb-include-order.patch`](bb44d9e754/depends/patches/qt/fix-xcb-include-order.patch), provided by #5915, was dropped in #12971 while bumping Qt to 5.9.4 (5.9.6). But `libxcb.mk` remained unchanged.
This PR reverts #5915 for `libxcb.mk` as well.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 173ef8980d921c9c0e46257747ab1165965e3ced: patch looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 173ef8980d921c9c0e46257747ab1165965e3ced
Tree-SHA512: 9815a7e532ff4aa08f9623ded8d5708eca1c9c73ac7a2684419a18c125da7627b44ac3191f2e7978946942c8d0580e73b1a93df624986fb2a13791a68ce1e025
bf57b15496 refactor: remove unneeded variable (pasta)
358ae3283d refactor: add some const (pasta)
4804aad2c9 refactor: a few more structured bindings (pasta)
ee6dc2d6ab refactor: remove some nested code blocks (pasta)
c2ac444abf refactor: create a immediately executed llamda; use some structed bindings inside of ti (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Resolve a lot of sonarlint and clang-tidy warnings. Please see individual commits
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
`make check`
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7481aaf5e5fae42fa896a9b770f41d9d3e1fa395569d2f9fffc952ec556737898283c5a4929063975852dd58fa857cd8374e78dd518983550870fd2683ad5f79
7cc305f1b2 refactor: RecursiveMutex -> Mutex for cs_mnauth (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Avoid using recursive mutexes where a non-recursive one does the job
## What was done?
RecursiveMutex -> Mutex
## How Has This Been Tested?
Built
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7c624263a1aa7aca61b12598a24fc570beca8a240ef66c5a80c86b410487a1450b3c3f31394d773c5a6041abe244708007a115f29212746d549268d376a267e1
fada2dfcac1c4b47ee76b877d91d515cf1d36410 test: Fix wallet_multiwallet issue on windows (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The error message on windows:
> 2020-11-30T18:10:47.536032Z ListWalletDir: Error scanning C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\test_runner_₿_🏃_20201130_181042\wallet_multiwallet_0\node0\regtest\wallets\self_walletdat_symlink: boost::filesystem::status: The name of the file cannot be resolved by the system: "C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\test_runner_₿_🏃_20201130_181042\wallet_multiwallet_0\node0\regtest\wallets\self_walletdat_symlink\wallet.dat"
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fada2dfcac1c4b47ee76b877d91d515cf1d36410. Although it could ignore (don't log) directories that lead to no permission error.
fanquake:
ACK fada2dfcac1c4b47ee76b877d91d515cf1d36410
Tree-SHA512: b475162cc3cd1574209d916605b229a79c8089714295f5e16569b71f958f0007d54dc76833938492d931387784588b11b73e3ef00f963540af42c079417f8d72
a266abef75 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22495: p2p: refactor: tidy up `PeerManagerImpl::Misbehaving(...)` (MarcoFalke)
d7985aa36a Merge #19512: p2p: banscore updates to gui, tests, release notes (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
b9799de985 Merge #19464: net: remove -banscore configuration option (MarcoFalke)
c0c5d05419 Merge #19469: rpc: deprecate banscore field in getpeerinfo (fanquake)
02faef78c2 Merge #19915: p2p, refactor: Use Mutex type for some mutexes in CNode class (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
bitcoin backports
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7537fd2203e10f3de03e3e2df7f9c7b4fcf05387325635c352a4e9898338e979bfd46626ceee8d267ea48aded4f342bca56ff8020e71dab79f37f4b1bb7cf27c
8858e88c840197cdcabea07dd1380ef2aa4ece02 p2p: refactor: tidy up `PeerManagerImpl::Misbehaving(...)` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This simple refactoring PR has the goal to improve the readability of the `Misbehaving` method by
- introducing constant variables `score_before` and `score_now` (to avoid repeatedly calculating the former)
- deduplicating calls to LogPrint(), eliminates else-branch
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 8858e88c840197cdcabea07dd1380ef2aa4ece02
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 8858e88c84
Tree-SHA512: 1d4dd5ac1d16ee9595edf4fa46e4960915a203641d74e6c33cffaba62ea71328834309a4451256fb45daf759f0cf6f4f199c46815afff6c89c0746e2ad4d4092
fa108d6a757838225179a8df942cfb6d99c98c90 test: update tests for peer discouragement (Jon Atack)
1a9f462caa63fa16d7b4415312d2032a42b3fe0b gui, doc: rm Ban Score in GUI Peers window/release notes updates (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the third `-banscore` PR in the mini-series described in #19464. See that PR for the intention and reasoning.
- no longer display "Ban Score" in the GUI peers window and add a release note, plus release note fixups per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19464#pullrequestreview-447452052
- update tests (`src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp` and `test/functional/p2p_leak.py`) from banning to discouragement and per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19464#issuecomment-658052518
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa108d6a757838225179a8df942cfb6d99c98c90
laanwj:
ACK fa108d6a757838225179a8df942cfb6d99c98c90
Tree-SHA512: 58a449b3f47b8cb5490b34e4442ee8675bfad1ce48af4e4fd5c67715b0c1a596fb8e731d42e576b4c3b64627f76e0a68cbb1da9ea9f588a5932fe119baf40d50
41d55d30579358c805036201664ad6a1c1d48681 doc: getpeerinfo banscore deprecation release note (Jon Atack)
dd54e3796e633cfdf6954af306afd26eadc25116 test: getpeerinfo banscore deprecation test (Jon Atack)
8c7647b3fbbab03ea84071cf3cd2d0d2bf8be255 rpc: deprecate banscore field in rpc getpeerinfo (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19219#discussion_r443074487 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19219#issuecomment-652699592, this PR deprecates returning the `banscore` field in the `getpeerinfo` RPC, updates the help, adds a test, and updates the release notes. Related to #19464.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 41d55d30579358c805036201664ad6a1c1d48681
Tree-SHA512: 8eca08332581e2fe191a2aafff6ba89ce39413f0491ed0de8b86577739f0ec430b1a8fbff2914b0f3138a229563dfcc1981c0cf5b7dd6061b5c48680a28423bc
0e51a355128a825d428fe2b9017c25085731fc04 refactor: Use Mutex type for some mutexes in CNode class (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
No need the `RecursiveMutex` type for the `CNode::cs_vSend`, `CNode::cs_hSocket` and `CNode::cs_vRecv`.
Related to #19303.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0e51a35512
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 0e51a355128a825d428fe2b9017c25085731fc04 🔊
Tree-SHA512: 678ee5e3c15ad21a41cb86ec7179741bd505a138638fdc07f41d6d677c38fbf2208219bfc0509e3675e721fc8d8816e858070db7b87c5d72ad93aae81f7e1636
57b6fe7327 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22257: test: refactor: various (de)serialization helpers cleanups/improvements (MarcoFalke)
5c85b7dc14 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21056: rpc: Add a `-rpcwaittimeout` parameter to limit time spent waiting (W. J. van der Laan)
eaa5f8ea31 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#20772: fuzz: bolster ExtractDestination(s) checks (MarcoFalke)
17598db793 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22408: test: add tests for `bad-txns-prevout-null` reject reason (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This PR and does not introduce breaking changes
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bitcoin backports
## What was done?
backports bitcoin PRS 22408 ,20772, 21056, 22257, 19776, 20599
## How Has This Been Tested?
In CI
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7261331876606bd46725116ecfcc39765428727840ecd557eee59ebd04de535485e1b02f15d03c5b8d58553bf1a62378707dd5eda08df9f1f9d0bf7171020815
bdb8b9a347e68f80a2e8d44ce5590a2e8214b6bb test: doc: improve doc for `from_hex` helper (mention `to_hex` alternative) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
191405420815d49ab50184513717a303fc2744d6 scripted-diff: test: rename `FromHex` to `from_hex` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a79396fe5f8f81c78cf84117a87074c6ff6c9d95 test: remove `ToHex` helper, use .serialize().hex() instead (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2ce7b47958c4a10ba20dc86c011d71cda4b070a5 test: introduce `tx_from_hex` helper for tx deserialization (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
There are still many functional tests that perform conversions from a hex-string to a message object (deserialization) manually. This PR identifies all those instances and replaces them with a newly introduced helper `tx_from_hex`.
Instances were found via
* `git grep "deserialize.*BytesIO"`
and some of them manually, when it were not one-liners.
Further, the helper `ToHex` was removed and simply replaced by `.serialize().hex()`, since now both variants are in use (sometimes even within the same test) and using the helper doesn't really have an advantage in readability. (see discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22257#discussion_r652404782)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review re-ACK bdb8b9a347e68f80a2e8d44ce5590a2e8214b6bb 😁
Tree-SHA512: e25d7dc85918de1d6755a5cea65471b07a743204c20ad1c2f71ff07ef48cc1b9ad3fe5f515c1efaba2b2e3d89384e7980380c5d81895f9826e2046808cd3266e
b9e76f1bf08c52fcd402b2314e00db4ad247ebc8 rpc: Add test for -rpcwaittimeout (Christian Decker)
f76cb10d7dc9a7b0c55d28011161606399417664 rpc: Prefix rpcwaittimeout error with details on its nature (Christian Decker)
c490e17ef698a1695050f82ef6567b3b87a21861 doc: Add release notes for the `-rpcwaittimeout` cli parameter (Christian Decker)
a7fcc8eb59fe51473571661316214156fbdbdcae rpc: Add a `-rpcwaittimeout` parameter to limit time spent waiting (Christian Decker)
Pull request description:
Adds a new numeric `-rpcwaittimeout` that can be used to limit the
time we spend waiting on the RPC server to appear. This is used by
downstream projects to provide a bit of slack when `bitcoind`s RPC
interface is not available right away.
This makes the `-rpcwait` argument more useful, since we can now limit
how long we'll ultimately wait, before potentially giving up and reporting
an error to the caller. It was discussed in the context of the BTCPayServer
wanting to have c-lightning wait for the RPC interface to become available
but still have the option of giving up eventually ([4355]).
I checked with laanwj whether this is already possible ([comment]), and
whether this would be a welcome change. Initially I intended to repurpose
the (optional) argument to `-rpcwait`, however I decided against it since it
would potentially break existing configurations, using things like `rpcwait=1`,
or `rpcwait=true` (the former would have an unintended short timeout, when
old behavior was to wait indefinitely).
~Due to its simplicity I didn't implement a test for it yet, but if that's desired I
can provide one.~ Test was added during reviews.
[4355]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355
[comment]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355#issuecomment-768288261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b9e76f1bf08c52fcd402b2314e00db4ad247ebc8
promag:
ACK b9e76f1bf08c52fcd402b2314e00db4ad247ebc8.
Tree-SHA512: 3cd6728038ec7ca7c35c2e7ccb213bfbe963f99a49bb48bbc1e511c4dd23d9957c04f9af1f8ec57120e47b26eaf580b46817b099d5fc5083c98da7aa92db8638
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
1f449586a9e39bc4fb53cb5c7a31362e47aea19b test: add `bad-txns-prevout-null` test to mempool_accept.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
aa0a5bb70d77739d43d5a9ceae78fb0c6fafd435 test: add `bad-txns-prevout-null` test case to invalid_txs.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This simple PR adds missing tests for the reject reason `bad-txns-prevout-null`, which is thrown in the function `CheckTransaction()`: a62fc35a15/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp (L52-L54)
Basically this condition is met for non-coinbase transactions (the code snippet above only hits if `!tx.IsCoinBase()`) with coinbase-like outpoints, i.e. hash=0, n=0xffffffff.
Can be tested by running the functional tests `feature_block.py`, `p2p_invalid_tx.py` and `mempool_accept.py`. Not sure if the redundancy in the tests is desired (I guess it would make sense if the mempool acceptance test also makes use of the invalid_txs templates?).
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 1f449586a9
brunoerg:
tACK 1f449586a9e39bc4fb53cb5c7a31362e47aea19b
kristapsk:
ACK 1f449586a9e39bc4fb53cb5c7a31362e47aea19b, code looks correct and all tests pass.
Tree-SHA512: 2d4f940a6ac8e0d80d2670c9e1111cbf43ae6ac62809a2ccf17cffee9a41d387ea4d889ee300eb4a407c055b13bfa5d37102a32ed59964a9b6950bd907ba7204
fa6847d2fb refactor: drop circular dependencies over deterministicmns in validationinterface (Konstantin Akimov)
f8d1853903 refactor: even more passing CDeterministicMNManager by ref (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d4aa891735 refactor: more passing CDeterministicMNManager by ref (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e628d7517a refactor: pass CDeterministicMNManager by ref to CJContext members (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d731f4127e refactor: pass CDeterministicMNManager by ref to LLMQContext members (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
6bd23f40aa refactor: pass CDeterministicMNManager by ref to CGovernanceManager (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
055dbba1fa refactor: move GetListAtChainTip() calls out of llmq::utils::*, misc changes (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
da39b73f01 refactor: move GetListAtChainTip() calls out of CGovernanceVote (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e9de972982 refactor: move GetListAtChainTip() calls out of CGovernanceObject (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5929
## Breaking Changes
None. Changes are limited to refactoring, no logical changes have been made.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
(self) utACK fa6847d2fb
knst:
utACK fa6847d2fb
Tree-SHA512: f1acf44bad25789d03c48788a3ac1807d7c553ee45164276ffa6f0dc39dc02e5d29d364469633aa84b341e8c4c13508e0e7a114de6e01fb624f256acfd97199b
140e91fdca merge bitcoin#20864: Move SocketSendData lock annotation to header (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e432122cbd net: Move CConnman/NetEventsInterface after CNode in header file (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
Broken off from upcoming backport PR relating to networking due to primarily move-only large diff.
Review large-diff commit using `git diff develop..e432122cbd1cc9bec45cc01c3eb4194a05af1d0e --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --patience` ([source](fa0a71781a))
## Breaking Changes
None. Changes are primarily move-only with minor changes.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 140e91fdca
Tree-SHA512: f2a42532819085aa8d0908b7b102f8d777681d247cd5cecf7f46f71435df2408f39fddd52382ed55ccee686a185092b0dd7f5029b2610be56d3a57b309466238
