Commit Graph

1969 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
fanquake
55d78e8b07
Merge #20346: script: modify security-check.py to use "==" instead of "is" for literal comparison
b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e swapped "is" for "==" in literal comparison (Tyler Chambers)

Pull request description:

  In Python 3.8+ literal comparisons using "is" instead of "==" produce a SyntaxWarning [source](https://docs.python.org/3.8/whatsnew/3.8.html#changes-in-python-behavior).

  I checked the entire devtools directory, this seems to be the only occurrence.

  This is a small fix, but removes the SyntaxWarning.
  Fixes: #20338

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    re-ACK b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e, only squashed since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20346#pullrequestreview-525934568) review.
  practicalswift:
    re-ACK b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e: patch still looks correct
  theStack:
    utACK b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e

Tree-SHA512: 82a43495d6552fbaa3b02b58f0930b049d27aa937fe44b47714e3c059f844cc494de20674557371cbccf24fb8873ecb7376fb965ae326847eed2b855ed2d59c6
2024-01-16 07:57:32 -06:00
MacroFake
736d2bc23c
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25126: test: add BIP157 message parsing support (via MESSAGEMAP)
5dc6d9207778c51c10c16fac4b3663bc7905bafc test: make BIP157 messages default-constructible (MESSAGEMAP compatibility) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
71e4cfefe765c58937b3fd3125782ca8407315d2 test: p2p: add missing BIP157 message types to MESSAGEMAP (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  The script [message-capture-parser.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py) currently doesn't support parsing the BIP157 messages `getcfilters`, `getcfheaders` and `getcfcheckpt`, e.g.
  ```
  $ ./contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py msgs_recv.dat
  ...
      WARNING - Unrecognized message type b'getcfcheckpt' in /home/thestack/bitcoin/msgs_recv.dat
  ...
  ```

  This PR fixes this by adding the missing message type mappings to the [`MESSAGEMAP`](225e5b57b2/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py (L95-L127)) in the test framework and add default-constructors for the corresponding `msg_`... classes.

  Without the second commit, the following error message would occur:
  ```
    File "/home/thestack/bitcoin/./contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py", line 141, in process_file
      msg = MESSAGEMAP[msgtype]()
  TypeError: __init__() missing 2 required positional arguments: 'filter_type' and 'stop_hash'
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  dunxen:
    tACK [5dc6d92](5dc6d92077)

Tree-SHA512: d656c4d38a856373f01d7c293ae7d2b27378a9fc248048ebf2a64725ef8b498b3ddf4f420704abdb20d0c68ca548f1777602c5e73b66821a20c97ae618f1d63f
2024-01-14 11:05:37 -06:00
MacroFake
b3343d73ab
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25124: test: Fix intermittent race in p2p_unrequested_blocks.py
faac67cab02a755b0ce67716c5e5889432b13b83 test: Fix intermittent race in p2p_unrequested_blocks.py (MacroFake)

Pull request description:

  Disconnect may also result in an `OSError`, not only an `AssertionError`. Instead of maintaining a dead code path and enumerating disconnect reasons, just assume disconnection happens every time.

ACKs for top commit:
  jamesob:
    Code review ACK faac67cab0

Tree-SHA512: d2cec003168e421a5faed275cb2e1ef9fc63f9e8514f41d21da17e8964c79e5b453ccd72cd7ec62805f45293cf877be5bc8124ae98a515c0aa42d6e053409653
2024-01-14 11:05:37 -06:00
MacroFake
431c1e3458
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25121: test: compare /mempool/info response with getmempoolinfo RPC
1df42bc262d994c30d390ea73b232b8d2548899e test: compare `/mempool/info` response with `getmempoolinfo` RPC (brunoerg)

Pull request description:

  This PRs compares `/mempool/info` REST response with `getmempoolinfo` RPC in `interface_rest.py`.
  Similar to #24936 and #24797.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    ACK 1df42bc262d994c30d390ea73b232b8d2548899e

Tree-SHA512: 2de36d70fa61612e7976f875e55f98e78b1cdb909b48cff18e6a70c55eda34b799e210bcd55361ea947388b7778d867290a73be4f799bb36afd65423ad49c487
2024-01-14 11:05:36 -06:00
laanwj
a245e52f55
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24793: test: Change color of skipped functional tests
3258bad996262792ba77573d6080dafa3952929c changes color of skipped functional tests (Jacob P. Fickes)

Pull request description:

  changes the color of skipped functional tests (currently grey and can be hard to read/invisible on dark backgrounds) to yellow.

  resolves #24791

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Tested ACK 3258bad996262792ba77573d6080dafa3952929c
  jarolrod:
    Tested ACK 3258bad996

Tree-SHA512: 3fe5ae0d3b4902b2b6bda6e89ab780feb8bf4b7cb1ce7e8467057b94a1e0a26ddeaf3cac0bc19b06ef10d8bccaac9c495029d42740fbedab8fb0d5fdd7d02eaf
2024-01-14 11:05:35 -06:00
laanwj
89c1e775c5
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24815: lint: convert lint-tests.sh to python
ae0e06a439e09a7e24dd6198591a588c8df2d529 Converted lint-tests.sh to python (TakeshiMusgrave)

Pull request description:

  Reference issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24783

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Tested ACK ae0e06a439e09a7e24dd6198591a588c8df2d529

Tree-SHA512: a118295b5b6b5199b52d46b54de871d88dd544112e7dd5001a9575d65b093af0aea390f9ad223462a4fc6a201bd8c4debe5e26bfa4860a90c97cfe300477c04a
2024-01-13 19:32:31 -06:00
MarcoFalke
710ea6e114
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24936: test: compare /mempool/contents response with getrawmempool RPC
bef61496ab5e12e38ac5794cd0836723af070ab5 test: compare `/mempool/contents` response with `getrawmempool` RPC (brunoerg)
5bc5cbaf310f60e89c72e8ecf3f6187c85499027 doc: add reference to `getrawmempool` RPC in `/mempool/contents` REST doc (brunoerg)

Pull request description:

  This PR is similar to #24797, it compares `/mempool/contents` REST response with `getrawmempool` RPC (verbose=True) since they use the same `MempoolToJSON` function.

  Also, adds a reference to `getrawmempool` RPC help to get details about the fields from `/mempool/contents`.

ACKs for top commit:
  0xB10C:
    ACK bef6149

Tree-SHA512: b7e9e9c765ee837986ba167b9234a9b95c9ef0a9ebcc2a03d50f6be6d3aba1480bd77c78111d95df1e4023cde6dfc64bf1e7908d9e5b6f96ca46b76611a4a9b4
2024-01-13 19:32:31 -06:00
laanwj
31fae25f68
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24803: lint: convert submodule linter test to Python
4a9e36dbaf96f83d0829f8442114a2fa36641776 lint: convert submodule linter test to Python (Eunoia)

Pull request description:

  Refs #24783

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Tested ACK 4a9e36dbaf96f83d0829f8442114a2fa36641776

Tree-SHA512: ca25b59acf75cebc79588a6c51dc5c313c8d0bd1d492127815d7b81b36aaffd02815a515d97b355582002f71efc33d46435d0b28fce24497bb99799d9ba57228
2024-01-13 19:32:31 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
4293cbdb53
Merge #20003: net: Exit with error message if -proxy is specified without arguments (instead of continuing without proxy server)
9b4fa0af40cd88ed25dd77962235fbf268bdcaa7 net: Print error message if -proxy is specified without arguments (instead of continuing without proxy server) (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Exit with error message if `-proxy` is specified without arguments (instead of continuing without proxy server).

  Continuing without a proxy server when the end-user has specified `-proxy` may result in accidental loss of privacy. (The end-user might think he/she is using a proxy when he/she is not.)

  Before this patch:

  ```
  $ src/bitcoind -proxy
  …
  2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -listen=0
  2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -upnp=0
  2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -discover=0
  2020-09-23T00:24:33Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -listen=0 -> setting -listenonion=0
  …
  2020-09-23T00:24:33Z init message: Starting network threads...
  ```

  `bitcoind` is now running *without* a proxy server (`GetProxy(…, …) == false`, `HaveNameProxy() == false`, etc.).

  Note that the "-proxy set" log messages above which the end-user might interpret as "good, my traffic is now routed via the proxy".

  After this patch:

  ```
  $ src/bitcoind -proxy
  Error: No proxy server specified. Use -proxy=<ip> or -proxy=<ip:port>.
  $ echo $?
  1
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    re-ACK 9b4fa0af40cd88ed25dd77962235fbf268bdcaa7
  kristapsk:
    ACK 9b4fa0af40cd88ed25dd77962235fbf268bdcaa7, I have tested the code.
  hebasto:
    re-ACK 9b4fa0af40cd88ed25dd77962235fbf268bdcaa7

Tree-SHA512: 4ba7a011991699a54b5bb87ec68367c681231bf5dcd36f8c89ff9ddc2e8d29df453817b7e362597e652ad6b341a22b7274be0fd78d435e5f0fd8058e5221c4ce
2024-01-10 19:22:59 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
a9401cca28
chore: update list of circular dependencies
It is partial de-circularisation of dependencies between that includes net_processing

Classes that still depends on net_processing but should not:
 - llmq/dkgsessionmgr
 - llmq/signing
 - llmq/instantsend

They have asynchronous processing and with current impl that's impossible to do
2024-01-10 15:12:08 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
bb1d46c5cb
feat: new util class expected for return errors by more convenient way
Source: https://github.com/TartanLlama/expected

Also it adds util/expected.h to exclude list of our linters
2024-01-10 15:12:05 -06:00
fanquake
7a39d5d031
Merge #19172: test: Do not swallow flake8 exit code
5d77549d8b287eb773db695b88c165ebe3be1005 doc: Add mypy to test dependencies (Hennadii Stepanov)
7dda912e1c28b02723c9f24fa6c4e9003d928978 test: Do not swallow flake8 exit code (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  After #18210 the `flake8` exit code in `test/lint/lint-python.sh` just not used that makes the linter broken.

  This PR:
  - combines exit codes of `flake8` and `mypy` into the  `test/lint/lint-python.sh` exit code
  - documents `mypy` as the test dependency

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    Approach ACK 5d77549d8b287eb773db695b88c165ebe3be1005, fine with me
  practicalswift:
    ACK 5d77549d8b287eb773db695b88c165ebe3be1005

Tree-SHA512: e948ba04dc4d73393967ebf3c6a26c40d428d33766382a0310fc64746cb7972e027bd62e7ea76898b742a656cf7d0fcda2fdd61560a21bfd7be249cea27f3d41
2024-01-10 12:07:54 -06:00
fanquake
271acac3a7
Merge #18210: test: type hints in Python tests
bd7e530f010d43816bb05d6f1590d1cd36cdaa2c This PR adds initial support for type hints checking in python scripts. (Kiminuo)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds initial support for type hints checking in python scripts.

  Support for type hints was introduced in Python 3.5. Type hints make it easier to read and review code in my opinion. Also an IDE may discover a potential bug sooner. Yet, as PEP 484 says: "It should also be emphasized that Python will remain a dynamically typed language, and the authors have no desire to ever make type hints mandatory, even by convention."

  [Mypy](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html) is used in `lint-python.sh` to do the type checking. The package is standard so there is little chance that it will be abandoned. Mypy checks that type hints in source code are correct when they are not, it fails with an error.

  **Notes:**

  * [--ignore-missing-imports](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_line.html#cmdoption-mypy-ignore-missing-imports) switch is passed on to `mypy` checker for now. The effect of this is that one does not need `# type: ignore` for `import zmq`. More information about import processing can be found [here](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html#missing-imports). This can be changed in a follow-up PR, if it is deemed useful.
  * We are stuck with Python 3.5 until 04/2021 (see https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/python3). When Python version is bumped to 3.6+, one can change:
      ```python
      _opcode_instances = []  # type: List[CScriptOp]
      ```
      to
      ```python
      _opcode_instances:List[CScriptOp] = []
      ```
      for type hints that are **not** function parameters and function return types.

  **Useful resources:**

  * https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/typing.html
  * https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK bd7e530f010d43816bb05d6f1590d1cd36cdaa2c - the type checking is not the most robust (there are things it fails to detect), but I think this is worth adopting (in a limited capacity while we maintain 3.5 compat).
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK bd7e530f010d43816bb05d6f1590d1cd36cdaa2c fine with me

Tree-SHA512: 21ef213915fb1dec6012f59ef17484e6c9e0abf542a316b63d5f21a7778ad5ebabf8961ef5fc8e5414726c2ee9c6ae07c7353fb4dd337f8fcef5791199c8987a
2024-01-10 12:07:54 -06:00
MarcoFalke
49b1a468c7
Merge #19294: test: refactor: Inline adjust_bitcoin_conf_for_pre_17
fa41b0a6dac7afd77e2b94eca6520ab3d2adc231 pep-8 test/functional/test_framework/util.py (MarcoFalke)
faa841bc979ca306f5ba4d5f7b78fcc427b8e413 test: refactor: Inline adjust_bitcoin_conf_for_pre_17 (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This removes mental and code complexity as well as attack surface for bikeshedding

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    utACK fa41b0a6dac7afd77e2b94eca6520ab3d2adc231

Tree-SHA512: 6e3c872e66d98ffaa7aecdfd64aa7dd8fbb51815a8fdaba170ce0772b4c3360084d0ebab4a5feac768ab5df50d04528d7daafc51ba07c15445c1ef94fa3efd34
2024-01-10 12:07:52 -06:00
MarcoFalke
152246f21a
Merge #19178: Make mininode_lock non-reentrant
62068381a3b9c065d81300be79abba7aecfdb41b [tests] Make mininode_lock non-reentrant (John Newbery)
c67c1f2c032a8efa141d776a7e5be58f052159ea [tests] Don't call super twice in P2PTxInvStore.on_inv() (John Newbery)
9d80762fa0931fe553fad241e95bcc1515ef0e95 [tests] Don't acquire mininode_lock twice in wait_for_broadcast() (John Newbery)
edae6075aa3b1169c84b65e76fd48d68242a294e [tests] Only acquire lock once in p2p_compactblocks.py (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  There's no need for mininode_lock to be reentrant.
  Use a simpler non-recursive lock.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 62068381a3b9c065d81300be79abba7aecfdb41b 😃
  jonatack:
    ACK 62068381a3b9c0

Tree-SHA512: dcbc19e6c986970051705789be0ff7bec70c69cf76d5b468c2ba4cb732883ad512b1de5c3206c2eca41fa3f1c4806999df4cabbf67fc3c463bb817458e59a19c
2024-01-10 12:07:52 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
fc582937f1
chore: drop circular dependency coinjoin/client <-> wallet 2024-01-10 12:06:02 -06:00
UdjinM6
c25d9aed80
fix: A set of qdata/qwatch related fixes (#5745)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Fix/tidy up a few `qdata`/`qwatch` related parts, improve performance
for regular non-watching nodes

~based on #5744 atm~

## What was done?
pls see individual commits

## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2024-01-09 21:31:41 -06:00
MarcoFalke
4143e359f7
(Partial) Merge #19725: [RPC] Add connection type to getpeerinfo, improve logs
a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c [doc] Release notes (Amiti Uttarwar)
50f94b34a33c954f6e207f509c93d33267a5c3e2 [rpc] Deprecate getpeerinfo addnode field (Amiti Uttarwar)
df091b9b509f0b10e4315c0bfa2da0cc0c31c22f [refactor] Rename test file to allow any getpeerinfo deprecations. (Amiti Uttarwar)
395acfa83a5436790c1a722a5609ac9d48df235f [rpc] Add connection type to getpeerinfo RPC, update tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
49c10a9ca40967d28ae16dfea9cccc6f3a6624a1 [log] Add connection type to log statement (Amiti Uttarwar)

Pull request description:

  After #19316, we can more directly expose information about the connection type on the `getpeerinfo` RPC. Doing so also makes the existing addnode field redundant, so this PR begins the process of deprecating this field.

  This PR also includes one commit that improves a log message, as both use a shared function to return the connection type as a string.

  Suggested by sdaftuar- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468001604 & https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19316#discussion_r468018093

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    Code review ACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c.
  sipa:
    utACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c
  guggero:
    Tested and code review ACK a512925e.
  MarcoFalke:
    cr ACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c 🌇
  promag:
    Code review ACK a512925e19a70d7f6b80ac530a169f45ffaafa1c.

Tree-SHA512: 601a7a38aee235ee59aca690784f886dc2ae4e418b2e6422c4b58cd597376c00f74910f66920b08a08a0bec28bf8022e71a1435785ff6ba8a188954261aba78e
2024-01-09 08:15:36 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
ae97ed8a6f
Merge #19368: test: improve functional tests compatibility with BSD/macOS
3a7e79478ab41af7c53ce14d9fca9815bffe1f73 test: retry when write to a socket fails on macOS (Ivan Metlushko)
8cf9d15b823d91d2a74fc83832fccca2219342c9 test: use pgrep for better compatibility (Ivan Metlushko)

Pull request description:

  Rationale: a few minor changes to make experience of running tests on macOS a bit better
  1.`pidof` is not available on BSD/macOS, while `pgrep` is present on BSD, Linux and macOS
  2. Add retry as a workaround for a weird behavior when writing to a socket (https://bugs.python.org/issue33450). Stacktrace attached

  Man pages:
  https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pgrep&apropos=0&sektion=1&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html
  https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/pgrep.1.html

  Related to #19281

  Stacktrace example:
  ```
  ...
  33/161 - feature_abortnode.py failed, Duration: 63 s

  stdout:
  2020-06-11T10:46:43.947000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /var/folders/2q/d5w9zh614r7g5c8r74ln3g400000gq/T/test_runner_₿_🏃_20200611_174102/feature_abortnode_128
  2020-06-11T10:46:45.199000Z TestFramework (INFO): Waiting for crash
  2020-06-11T10:47:15.921000Z TestFramework (INFO): Node crashed - now verifying restart fails
  2020-06-11T10:47:47.068000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
  [node 1] Cleaning up leftover process

  stderr:
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/feature_abortnode.py", line 50, in <module>
      AbortNodeTest().main()
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 142, in main
      exit_code = self.shutdown()
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 266, in shutdown
      self.stop_nodes()
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 515, in stop_nodes
      node.stop_node(wait=wait)
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 318, in stop_node
      self.stop(wait=wait)
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
      return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 142, in __call__
      response, status = self._request('POST', self.__url.path, postdata.encode('utf-8'))
    File "/Users/xxx/Projects/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 107, in _request
      self.__conn.request(method, path, postdata, headers)
    File "/Users/xxx/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/http/client.py", line 1107, in request
      self._send_request(method, url, body, headers)
    File "/Users/xxx/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/http/client.py", line 1152, in _send_request
      self.endheaders(body)
    File "/Users/xxx/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/http/client.py", line 1103, in endheaders
      self._send_output(message_body)
    File "/Users/xxx/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/http/client.py", line 936, in _send_output
      self.send(message_body)
    File "/Users/xxx/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/http/client.py", line 908, in send
      self.sock.sendall(data)
  OSError: [Errno 41] Protocol wrong type for socket
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK 3a7e79478ab41af7c53ce14d9fca9815bffe1f73

Tree-SHA512: fefbe40ce94ab29f18bbbed2a434194b1384ffa5279b1d04db7a3708e3dd422bd9e450f1db3f95a1a851fac5a626ab533c6ebcfd7ede96f8ccae9e6f3e9fff92
2024-01-06 19:30:15 -06:00
MarcoFalke
2d95e9284c
Merge #19014: test: Replace TEST_PREVIOUS_RELEASES env var with test_framework option
fad798be76dd5e330463c837fda768477d536078 test: Default --previous-releases to false if dir is empty (MarcoFalke)
faf1c3cc58d14f86ba5364e6ee5c8ef29cac2e26 test: Replace TEST_PREVIOUS_RELEASES env var with test_framework option (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  The "auto-detection" feature is kept in place, but making it an option allows to properly document it. For example, on my machine I get:

  ```
  $ ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py --help | grep previous-releases
    --previous-releases   Force test of previous releases (default: False)

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    re-tACK fad798b

Tree-SHA512: a7377d0d5378be0a50be278d76396cc403583617b5fc43467773eee706df698acf3f4e67651491183b9b43a8e1816b052e4c17b90272b7ec4b6ac134ad811400
2024-01-06 19:30:14 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
cf12572c67
fix: withdrawal (asset unlock) txes to use Platform Quorum on RegTest (#5800)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Asset Unlock tx uses platform's quorum on devnets, testnet, mainnet, but
still quorum type "Test (100)" on Reg Tests
That's part II PR, prior work is here:
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5618

## What was done?
- Removed `consensus.llmqTypeAssetLocks` which has been kept only for
RegTest - use `consensus.llmqTypePlatform` instead.
- Functional test `feature_asset_locks.py` uses `llmq_type_test = 106`
instead `llmq_type_test = 100` for asset unlock tx
- there's 4 MNs + 3 evo nodes instead 3 MNs as before: evo nodes
requires to have IS to be active


## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests


## Breaking Changes
Asset Unlock tx uses correct quorum "106 llmq_test_platform" on reg test
instead "100 llmq_test"

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2024-01-06 19:28:47 -06:00
UdjinM6
25111262cd
fix: ignore triggers from the past when voting (#5798)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
we should not vote on triggers from the past

## What was done?

## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2024-01-06 19:27:26 -06:00
MarcoFalke
5a18a539db
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24800: lint: convert lint-python-mutable-default-parameters.sh to Python
e8e48fa82bdce3f0c1da0693148867befa221de7 Converted lint-python-mutable-default-parameters.sh to python (TakeshiMusgrave)

Pull request description:

  This converts one of the linter scripts to Python. Reference issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24783

  The approach is to just call git grep using subprocess.run.

  Alternative approaches could be to use Python instead of git grep (I'm not sure how) or use ```pylint --disable=all --enable=W0102```, though that requires installation of pylint.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK e8e48fa82bdce3f0c1da0693148867befa221de7

Tree-SHA512: 7f6f4887dee02c9751b225a6a131fb705868859c4a9af25bb3485cda2358650486b110f17adf89d96a20f212d7d94899922a07aab12c8dc11984cfd5feb7a076
2024-01-02 11:17:47 -06:00
fanquake
5899f13660
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24790: lint: remove qt SIGNAL/SLOT lint
b72925e7cea11522aca65580c136dbacb2753e83 lint: remove qt SIGNAL/SLOT lint (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  I think we are past the point where we need to lint for this, the CPU
  can probably be better utilized.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK b72925e7cea11522aca65580c136dbacb2753e83

Tree-SHA512: 3da6e4811cdd16ff64c7e26f641f7b24f0405cc86cec36666de58691d447eca8662c924df31c6c60b3523c13590bdc62205a3237b1b1794dd8cdef35519309b3
2024-01-02 11:17:47 -06:00
MarcoFalke
6404d989df
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24707: doc: Speed up functional test runs using ramdisk
17648493df478fa9316cc9ed66fe6bc1c2c820a4 doc: Speed up functional test runs using ramdisk (willcl-ark)

Pull request description:

  Using a ramdisk for the functional tests can give noticable speedups for developers and reviewers.

  Local testing with an 8GB ramdisk saw a full test run using `test/functional/test_runner.py --jobs=100 --cachedir=/mnt/tmp/cache --tmpdir=/mnt/tmp` reduced from ~280 seconds to ~99 seconds.

  Possible bikeshedding opportunity to be had over whether this might best fit into `doc/productivity.md`, but IMO more people will likely see it (and it will therefore be more useful) if it is here.

  It seems best to select `tmpfs` over `ramfs` as `ramfs` can grow dynamically (good) but cannot be limited in size and might cause the system to hang if you run out of ram (bad), whereas `tmpfs` is size-limited and will overflow into swap.

ACKs for top commit:
  josibake:
    ACK 17648493df
  jamesob:
    ACK 17648493df

Tree-SHA512: b8e0846d4558a7a33fbb7cd190e30c36182db36095e1c1feae8c10a12042cff9d97739964bd9211d8564231dc99b4be5eed806d12a1d11dfa908157d7f26cc67
2024-01-02 11:17:46 -06:00
MarcoFalke
592c4e30e7
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23795: refactor: Remove implicit-integer-sign-change suppressions in validation
fadd73037e266edb844f0972e82e9213171ef214 refactor: Remove implicit-integer-sign-change suppressions in validation.cpp (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  A file-wide suppression is problematic because it will wave through future violations, potentially bugs.

  Fix that by using per-statement casts.

ACKs for top commit:
  shaavan:
    ACK fadd73037e266edb844f0972e82e9213171ef214
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK fadd73037e266edb844f0972e82e9213171ef214

Tree-SHA512: a8a05613be35382b92d7970f958a4e8f4332432056eaa9d72f6719495134b93aaaeea692899d9035654d0e0cf56bcd759671eeeacfd0535582c0ea048ab58a56
2023-12-26 22:26:20 -06:00
MarcoFalke
7d601cfa85
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23681: test: Remove false coinstatsindex test
c055f6b216659b844c8dcd4ff2a977f181099678 test: Remove false coinstatsindex test (Fabian Jahr)

Pull request description:

  This test never actually tested the behavior that it describes in the comments. This was discovered in #21590 which seems to speed up muhash which lead to the test failing.

  I can vaguely remember that the described behavior was desired by some reviewers of `coinstatsindex`: That `coinstatsindex` should be aware of stale blocks and able to return statistics on them as well. The index actually does this for blocks that it sees while the index is active, i.e. while running `coinstatsindex` all blocks will be indexed and even when they become stale the index (via `gettxoutsetinfo`) will still return a result for them when given the right hash. But this currently does not work for blocks that the node saw and that became stale _before_ the node activated `coinstatsindex`. While the index syncs initially everything but the active chain is ignored and I don't see any indication that this ever worked differently in the past.

  Introducing this behavior seems non-trivial at first glance so, while I will give this a shot, I think the test should be removed so it does not confuse users and does not block #21590.

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: b05f5dfeea3e453c8bb7c761501d0d896d4412a3f0c08037955951fae9fe388c63402da401792591e18da8fb67734f47f1a297d573cdb66e0ced451698718067
2023-12-26 22:26:20 -06:00
MarcoFalke
d2b9631a90
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22492: wallet: Reorder locks in dumpwallet to avoid lock order assertion
9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 tests: Test for dumpwallet lock order issue (Andrew Chow)
25d99e6511d8c43b2025a89bcd8295de755346a7 Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go first (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  When a wallet is loaded which has an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool, it will end up establishing the lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. If `dumpwallet` is used on this wallet, then a lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main will be used, which causes a lock order assertion. This PR fixes this by reordering `dumpwallet` and `GetKeyBirthTimes` (only used by `dumpwallet`). Specifically, in both functions, the function calls which lock cs_main are done prior to locking cs_KeyStore. This avoids the lock order issue.

  Additionally, I have added a test case to `wallet_dump.py`. Of course testing this requires `--enable-debug`.

  Fixes #22489

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 🎰
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4. Nice to reduce lock scope, and good test!
  prayank23:
    tACK 9b85a5e2f7
  lsilva01:
    Tested ACK 9b85a5e2f7 under the same conditions reported in issue #22489 and the `dumpwallet` command completed successfully.

Tree-SHA512: d370a8f415ad64ee6a538ff419155837bcdbb167e3831b06572562289239028c6b46d80b23d227286afe875d9351f3377574ed831549ea426fb926af0e19c755
2023-12-24 11:59:46 -06:00
MarcoFalke
9e5ee6ac52
Merge #20316: test: Fix wallet_multiwallet test issue on Windows
fa00ff0399fe54f42d80daa04140d19bcfe0e2d8 test: Fix wallet_multiwallet test issue on Windows (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixes:

  ```
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "test\functional\test_framework\test_framework.py", line 126, in main
      self.run_test()
    File "test/functional/wallet_multiwallet.py", line 120, in run_test
      assert_equal(sorted(map(lambda w: w['name'], self.nodes[0].listwalletdir()['wallets'])), sorted(in_wallet_dir))
    File "test\functional\test_framework\util.py", line 49, in assert_equal
      raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args))
  AssertionError: not(['', 'sub\\w5', 'w', 'w1', 'w2', 'w3', 'w7', 'w7_symlink', 'w8'] == ['', 'sub/w5', 'w', 'w1', 'w2', 'w3', 'w7', 'w7_symlink', 'w8'])

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    ACK fa00ff0399fe54f42d80daa04140d19bcfe0e2d8.

Tree-SHA512: 7a809a352677a216465cef59e866e4881272e302e897cebf7d9645bf87aebeaf54435bb0692bb5c1381c2dd680e8a34e640ea18ca6e2a4087e3233cd9c24ed04
2023-12-24 11:59:43 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
25cef45858
feat(rpc): gettxchainlocks should return mempool=false when tx not in mempool (#5742)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform (in the scope of Withdrawals) need to be aware if a tx isn't in
mempool when requesting status of a tx using RPC `gettxchainlocks`.
cc @markin-io

## What was done?

- mempool is passed to `GetTransaction` and saving the result for
checking latter.
- If the returned tx_ref is nullptr, then the RPC returns null for the
corresponding tx in the array.

Example: 
`tx1` is mined and chainlocked, `tx2` is in mempool and `tx3` doesn't
exist.
The result now is:
`[
  {
    "height": 830,
    "chainlock": false,
    "mempool": true
  },
  {
    "height": -1,
    "chainlock": false,
    "mempool": true
  },
  {
    "height": -1,
    "chainlock": false,
    "mempool": false
  }
]`

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-12-24 11:58:14 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
563cc34b4e
feat(rpc): Asset Unlock status by index (#5776)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform in the scope of credit withdrawals, need a way to get the
status of an Asset Unlock by index.

## What was done?
A new RPC was created `getassetunlockchainlocks` that accepts Asset
Unlock indexes array as parameter and return corresponding status for
each index.

The possible outcomes per each index are:
- `chainlocked`: If the Asset Unlock index is mined on a Chainlocked
block.
- `mined`: If no Chainlock information is available, and the Asset
Unlock index is mined.
- `mempooled`: If the Asset Unlock index is in the mempool.
- `unknown`: If none of the above are valid.

Note: This RPC is whitelisted for the Platform RPC user.

## How Has This Been Tested?
Inserted on `feature_asset_locks.py` covering cases where Asset Unlock
txs are in mempool, mined and not present.

## Breaking Changes
no

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
2023-12-22 14:27:00 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
4083fff0b2
refactor: drop circular dependency governance/object <-> governance/validators 2023-12-21 23:04:43 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
7e13727738
refactor: drop circular dependency validationinterface <-> governance/object 2023-12-21 23:04:43 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
70fa626381 refactor: drop dependency validation on llmq/utils 2023-12-21 23:02:31 -06:00
UdjinM6
647f4831c1
chore: update file permissions in tests, add missing executable flag (#5778)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
old mode 100644
new mode 100755

## What was done?
`chmod +x test/functional/*.py`

## How Has This Been Tested?
can now run these test directly e.g. `./test/functional/rpc_quorum.py`

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2023-12-19 08:03:11 -06:00
UdjinM6
9a99a4abdc
fix(rpc): pass blockhash into TxToJSON so that getspecialtxes could show correct instantlock/chainlock values (#5774)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`instantlock` and `chainlock` are broken in `getspecialtxes`

kudos to @thephez for finding the issue

## What was done?
pass the hash and also rename the variable to self-describing

## How Has This Been Tested?
run `getspecialtxes` on a node with and without the patch

## Breaking Changes
`instantlock` and `chainlock` will show actual values and not just
`false` all the time now (not sure if that qualifies for "breaking"
though)

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2023-12-19 07:43:36 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
3bc77a6e1d
feat(rpc): submit chainlock signature if needed RPC (#5765)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Once Platform is live, there could be an edge case where the CL could
arrive to an EvoNode faster through Platform quorum than regular P2P
propagation.

## What was done?
This PR introduces a new RPC `submitchainlock` with the following 3
mandatory parameters:
- `blockHash`, `signature` and `height`.

Besides some basic tests:
- If the block is unknown then the RPC returns an error (could happen if
the node is stucked)
- If the signature is not verified then the RPC return an error.
- If the node already has this CL, the RPC returns true.
- If the node doesn't have this CL, it inserts it, broadcast it through
the inv system and return true.

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_chainlocks.py` was modified with the following scenario:

1. node0 is isolated from the rest of the network
2. node1 mines a new block and waits for CL
3. Make sure node0 doesn't know the new block/CL (by checking
`getbestchainlock()`)
4. CL is submitted via the new RPC on node0
5. checking `getbestchainlock()` and make sure the CL was processed +
'known_block' is false
6. reconnect node0

## Breaking Changes
no

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-12-18 22:27:19 -06:00
Vijay Das Manikpuri
38b9074275 (partial) Merge #24203: doc: Fix typos pointed out by lint-spelling 2023-12-11 15:48:44 -06:00
MarcoFalke
8b98e1ab7b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#18795: Test: wallet issue with orphaned rewards
e4356f6a6c18e5027a064a4d3a5deda27985f584 Testcase for wallet issue with orphaned rewards. (Daniel Kraft)

Pull request description:

  This adds a new test case demonstrating the wallet issue when block rewards are orphaned (#14148).

ACKs for top commit:
  LarryRuane:
    ACK e4356f6a6c18e5027a064a4d3a5deda27985f584
  leonardojobim:
    reACK e4356f6a6c .

Tree-SHA512: e9a2310ee1b3d52cfa302f431ed3d272bbc1b9195439ff318d9eb1006c0b28968dbe840e1600b6ff185e5d7ea57e4dcc837cef16051b5537445e10bc363b8c22
2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
b8267bb5a2 Merge #17556: test: Change feature_config_args.py not to rely on strange regtest=0 behavior
ff44cae279bef7997f76db18deb1e41b39f05cb6 test: Change feature_config_args.py not to rely on strange regtest=0 behavior (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  Update test to simply generate a normal mainnet configuration file instead of using a crazy setup where a regtest=1 config file using an includeconf in the [regtest] section includes another config file that specifies regtest=0, retroactively switching the network to mainnet.

  This setup was fragile and only worked because the triggered InitError happened early enough that none of the ignored [regtest] options mattered (only affecting log output).

  This change was originally made as part of #17493

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 3f77305454f04438493dfc2abd78a00434b30869454d1c3f54587b9c1f63239c49c90fb3b4d3a777ad130f2184e0f2dac87cee4cd23c50f1b3496a375943da01
2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
cff1c7b2c3 Merge #21043: net: Avoid UBSan warning in ProcessMessage(...)
3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b util: Disallow negative mocktime (MarcoFalke)
f5f2f9716885e7548809e77f46b493c896a019bf net: Avoid UBSan warning in ProcessMessage(...) (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Avoid UBSan warning in `ProcessMessage(...)`.

  Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20380#issuecomment-770427182 (thanks Crypt-iQ!)

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK 3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b only change is adding patch written by me
  ajtowns:
    ACK 3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b -- code review only

Tree-SHA512: e8d7af0457ca86872b75a4e406c0a93aafd841c2962e244e147e748cc7ca118c56be0fdafe53765f4b291410030b2c3cc8f76f733b37a955d34fc885ab6037b9
2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
1c0cb3e8cc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22418: release: Remove gitian
ab9c34237ab7b056394e0bd1f7cb131ffd95754c release: remove gitian (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  Note that this doesn't yet touch any glibc back compat related code.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK ab9c34237ab7b056394e0bd1f7cb131ffd95754c

Tree-SHA512: 8e2fe3ec1097f54bb11ab9136b43818d90eab5dbb0a663ad6a552966ada4bdb49cc12ff4e66f0ec0ec5400bda5c81f3a3ce70a9ebb6fe1e0db612da9f00a51a7
2023-12-06 12:40:58 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
3f77d2312f Merge #16525: Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv
e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773 Additionally treat Tx.nVersion as unsigned in joinpsbts (Matt Corallo)
970de70bdd3542e75b73c79b06f143168c361494 Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv (Matt Corallo)

Pull request description:

  Consensus-wise we already treat it as an unsigned integer (the
  only rules around it are in CSV/locktime handling), but changing
  the underlying data type means touching consensus code for a
  simple cleanup change, which isn't really worth it.

  See-also, https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/299

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773
  practicalswift:
    ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773
  ajtowns:
    ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773 code review -- checked all other uses of tx.nVersion treat it as unsigned (except for policy.cpp:IsStandard anyway), so looks good.
  naumenkogs:
    ACK e80259f

Tree-SHA512: 6760a2c77e24e9e1f79a336ca925f9bbca3a827ce02003c71d7f214b82ed3dea13fa7d9f87df9b9445cd58dff8b44a15571d821c876f22f8e5a372a014c9976b
2023-12-06 12:33:15 -06:00
MarcoFalke
a800821e9f Merge #18965: tests: implement base58_decode
60ed33904cf974e8f3c1b95392a23db1fe2d4a98 tests: implement base58_decode (10xcryptodev)

Pull request description:

  implements TODO: def base58_decode

ACKs for top commit:
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 60ed33904cf974e8f3c1b95392a23db1fe2d4a98. Just suggested changes since last review. Thank you for taking suggestions!

Tree-SHA512: b3c06b4df041a6d88033cd077a093813a688e42d0b9aa777c715e5fd69cfba7b1bf984428bd98417d3c15232d3d48bc9c163317564f9e1d562db6611c21e2c10
2023-12-06 12:33:15 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
e29a35a997 Merge #18309: zmq: Add support to listen on multiple interfaces
e66870c5a4c2adbd30dca67d409fd5cd98697587 zmq: Append address to notify log output (nthumann)
241803da211265444e65f254f24dd184f2457fa9 test: Add zmq test to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
a0b2e5cb6aa8db0563fac7d67a949b9baefe3a25 doc: Add release notes to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
b1c3f180ecb63f3960506d202feebaa4271058ae doc: Adjust ZMQ usage to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
347c94f551c3f144c44e00373e4dd61ff6d908b7 zmq: Add support to listen on multiple interfaces (Nicolas Thumann)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds support for ZeroMQ to listen on multiple interfaces, just like the RPC server.
  Currently, if you specify more than one e.g. `zmqpubhashblock` paramter, only the first one will be used. Therefore a user may be forced to listen on all interfaces (e.g. `zmqpubhashblock=0.0.0.0:28332`), which can result in an increased attack surface.
  With this PR a user can specify multiple interfaces to listen on, e.g.
  `-zmqpubhashblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:28332 -zmqpubhashblock=tcp://192.168.1.123:28332`.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK e66870c5a4c2adbd30dca67d409fd5cd98697587
  instagibbs:
    reACK e66870c5a4

Tree-SHA512: f38ab4a6ff00dc821e5f4842508cefadb701e70bb3893992c1b32049be20247c8aa9476a1f886050c5f17fe7f2ce99ee30193ce2c81a7482a5a51f8fc22300c7
2023-12-06 12:33:15 -06:00
UdjinM6
8a888fb6ee
fix: improve qgetdata/qdata tests (#5744)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The test is a bit broken and incomplete, some testing scenarios aren't
realistic

## What was done?
pls see individual commits

## How Has This Been Tested?
run it

## Breaking Changes
n/a, tests only

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2023-12-06 11:48:21 -06:00
MarcoFalke
f7f29d72fa follow-up Merge #14559: appveyor: Enable multiwallet tests - adds missing changes for wallet_multiwallet.py test
4dca7d0a98 appveyor: Enable multiwallet test (Chun Kuan Lee)

Pull request description:

  Based on #14320

  This PR enable multiwallet test on appveyor. Also re-enable symlink tests on Windows which is available after Windows Vista.

  I disable these tests in #13964 because I suppose that Windows does not support symlink, but I was wrong.

Tree-SHA512: 852cd4dedf36ec9c34aff8926cb34e6a560aea0bb9170c7a2264fc292dbb605622d561568d8df39aeb90d3d2bb700901d218ea7e7c5e21d84827c40d6370b369
2023-12-06 11:46:53 -06:00
Samuel Dobson
f6f9b9851f Merge #17219: wallet: allow transaction without change if keypool is empty
92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37 [wallet] allow transaction without change if keypool is empty (Sjors Provoost)
709f8685ac37510aa145ac259753583c82280038 [wallet] CreateTransaction: simplify change address check (Sjors Provoost)
5efc25f9638866941028454cfa9bae27f1519cb4 [wallet] translate "Keypool ran out" message (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  Extracted from #16944

  First this PR simplifies the check when generating a change address, by dropping `CanGetAddresses` and just letting `reservedest.GetReservedDestination` do this check.

  Second, when the keypool is empty, instead of immediately giving up, we create a dummy change address and pass that to coin selection. If we didn't need the change address (e.g. when spending the entire balance), then it's all good. If we did need a change address, we throw the original error.

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    Code review ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
  jonasschnelli:
    utACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
  achow101:
    ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
  meshcollider:
    Code review ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37

Tree-SHA512: 07b8c8251f57061c58a85ebf0359be63583c23bac7a2c4cefdc14820c0cdebcc90a2bb218e5ede0db11d1e204cda149e056dfd18614642070b3d56efe2735006
2023-12-06 11:46:53 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
9fd9e4cf5a Merge #20567: test: Add option to git-subtree-check to do full check, add help
34c80d9eee7d21755f2bb80f7c97fd30d2c7b656 test: Add option to git-subtree-check to do full check, add help (Wladimir J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  This adds a brief help text to `git-subtree-check.sh` and adds an option to do a full remote check instead of having two different code paths with a successful exit status. Also make it explicit that the CI is not doing this.

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    tested ACK 34c80d9eee7d21755f2bb80f7c97fd30d2c7b656

Tree-SHA512: 20f672fd3b3c1d633eccf9998fdd738194cdd7d10cc206691f2dcc28bbbf8187b8d06b87814f875a06145b179f5ca1f4f4f9922972be72759cf5ac6e0c11abd1
2023-12-06 11:40:14 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
f706a562a7 Merge #19258: doc: improve subtree check instructions
a4a3fc4cd2e6f53cdffcc2962fd152a4e40c7413 doc: improve subtree check instructions (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  Running `git-subtree-check.sh` requires adding the subtree repository as a remote. I learned that several years ago and then forgot again.

  This PR also improves the error message if the subtree commit can't be found.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK a4a3fc4cd2e6f53cdffcc2962fd152a4e40c7413
  fanquake:
    ACK a4a3fc4cd2e6f53cdffcc2962fd152a4e40c7413 - this looks ok.

Tree-SHA512: 959bd923726c172d17f9f97f8a56988bf2df5a94d3131e5152a66150b941394cee9e82fdc6b86e09c0ba91d123a496599f07ca454212168d8d301738394c12c8
2023-12-06 11:40:14 -06:00