6431f71b3a Merge bitcoin-core/gui#393: Fix regression in "Encrypt Wallet" menu item (Hennadii Stepanov)
fc900a8aea Merge bitcoin-core/gui#333: refactor: Signal-slot connections cleanup (Hennadii Stepanov)
9ca2aad0b3 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#164: Handle peer addition/removal in a right way (Hennadii Stepanov)
7d9ce32562 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#29: refactor: Optimize signal-slot connections logic (Hennadii Stepanov)
3be79a9ed9 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#256: Save/restore column sizes of the tables in the Peers tab (Hennadii Stepanov)
f4fccd31cb Merge bitcoin-core/gui#329: Make console buttons look clickable (Hennadii Stepanov)
5a0d524506 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#123: rpc: Do not accept command while executing another one (Hennadii Stepanov)
19310646e0 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#331: Make RPC console welcome message translation-friendly (Hennadii Stepanov)
69a1305978 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#309: Add access to the Peers tab from the network icon (Hennadii Stepanov)
c858325d40 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#346: English translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
412445afb5 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#313: qt: Optimize string concatenation by default (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Gui related backports from bitcoin v22
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
See also:
<img alt="right menu" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/116794314-d64b9b80-aad4-11eb-89ca-7f75c7442ba8.gif"/>
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
light ACK 6431f71b3a
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 6431f71b3a
Tree-SHA512: bb14de71c9375b10da695db6c521c26686815b8b5ca2748bfe3bd2eafa9d332acd60acd85a1f2eed3aa831d16e5741ecc7570130ce9cf5bff011c065b55d62b2
62cb8d98d27e7f316f01f177f35ad0ed6f8cd9ce qt: Drop BitcoinGUI* WalletFrame data member (Hennadii Stepanov)
f73e5c972ab096e0f80cb9e753fa221d17313358 qt: Move CreateWalletActivity connection from WalletFrame to BitcoinGUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
20e2e24e90d782219e853ef0676ac66dc6a9de6a qt: Move WalletView connections from WalletFrame to BitcoinGUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- implements an idea from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17937#issuecomment-575991765
- simplifies `WalletFrame` class interface
- as a side effect, removes `bitcoingui` -> `walletframe` -> `bitcoingui` circular dependency
- is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17500
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Tested ACK 62cb8d98d27e7f316f01f177f35ad0ed6f8cd9ce on macos 11.2.3 with depends build.
jarolrod:
ACK 62cb8d98d27e7f316f01f177f35ad0ed6f8cd9ce
Tree-SHA512: 633b526a8499ba9ab4b16928daf4de4f6d610284bb9fa51891cad35300a03bde740df3466a71b46e87a62121330fcc9e606eac7666ea5e45fa6d5785b60dcbbd
DSQ messages are 142 bytes.
Previously, assuming a relatively highly connected masternode hosting 100 connection, each round of coinjoin will result in 14.2KB (100*142) of inbound and outbound traffic each.
Now, using the inventory system, a message will first use 36 bytes per peer (sending and receiving), plus the size of a `getdata` message and the actual message itself. As a result, bandwidth usage for 1 round of mixing would be closer to 36 * 100 + 142 (dsq) + 36 (getdata) = ~3.8KB, a reduction of around ~73%
7e698732836121912f179b7c743a72dd6fdffa72 sync: remove DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION preprocessor directives (Jon Atack)
9b08006bc502e67956d6ab518388fad6397cac8d log, sync: improve lock contention logging and add time duration (Jon Atack)
3f4c6b87f1098436693c4990f2082515ec0ece26 log, timer: add timing macro in usec LOG_TIME_MICROS_WITH_CATEGORY (Jon Atack)
b7a17444e0746c562ae97b26eba431577947b06a log, sync: add LOCK logging category, apply it to lock contention (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
To enable lock contention logging, `DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION` has to be defined at compilation. Once built, the logging is not limited to a category and is high frequency, verbose and in all-caps. With these factors combined, it seems likely to be rarely used.
This patch:
- adds a `lock` logging category
- adds a timing macro in microseconds, `LOG_TIME_MICROS_WITH_CATEGORY`
- updates `BCLog::LogMsg()` to omit irrelevant decimals for microseconds and skip unneeded code and math
- improves the lock contention logging, drops the all-caps, and displays the duration in microseconds
- removes the conditional compilation directives
- allows lock contentions to be logged on startup with `-debug=lock` or at run time with `bitcoin-cli logging '["lock"]'`
```
$ bitcoind -signet -debug=lock
2021-09-01T12:40:01Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:1920 started
2021-09-01T12:40:01Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:1920 completed (4μs)
2021-09-01T12:40:01Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:1302 started
2021-09-01T12:40:01Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:1302 completed (4μs)
2021-09-01T12:40:02Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:2242 started
2021-09-01T12:40:02Z LockContention: cs_vNodes, net.cpp:2242 completed (20μs)
2021-09-01T12:43:04Z LockContention: ::cs_main, validation.cpp:4980 started
2021-09-01T12:43:04Z LockContention: ::cs_main, validation.cpp:4980 completed (3μs)
$ bitcoin-cli -signet logging
"lock": true,
$ bitcoin-cli -signet logging [] '["lock"]'
"lock": false,
$ bitcoin-cli -signet logging '["lock"]'
"lock": true,
```
I've tested this with Clang 13 and GCC 10.2.1, on Debian, with and without `--enable-debug`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 7e698732836121912f179b7c743a72dd6fdffa72, added a contention duration to the log message since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22736#pullrequestreview-743764606) review.
theStack:
re-ACK 7e698732836121912f179b7c743a72dd6fdffa72 🔏⏲️
Tree-SHA512: c4b5eb88d3a2c051acaa842b3055ce30efde1f114f61da6e55fcaa27476c1c33a60bc419f7f5ccda532e1bdbe70815222ec2b2b6d9226f29c8e94e598aacfee7
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The architecture of bitcoin assumes that there's no any external class
that processes network messages and knows anything about PeerManager
from net_processing; no any external call for PeerManager::Misbehaving
in bitcoin. All logic related to processing messages are located in
net_processing.
Dash has many many extra types of network messages and many of them
processed by external components such as llmq/signing or
coinjoin/client. Current architecture creates multiple circular
dependency.
## What was done?
That's part II of refactorings.
This PR removes PeerManager from several constructor and let LLMQContext
to forget about PeerManager.
Prior work in this PR: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5782
## What else to do?
Some network messages are processed asynchronously in external
components such as llmq/signing, llmq/instantsend,
llmq/dkgsessionhandler. It doesn't let to refactor them easily, because
they can't just simple return status of processing; status of processing
would be available sometime later and there's need callback or other way
to pass result code without spreading PeerManager over codebase.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Run unit/functional tests
- run a linter test/lint/lint-circular-dependencies.sh
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`llmq/utils` has simple util code that used all over code base and also
have too heavy code for calculation quorums such as:
`GetAllQuorumMembers`, `EnsureQuorumConnections` and other.
These helpers for calculation quorums are used only by
evo/deterministicmns, evo/simplifiedmns and llmq/* modules, but
llmq/utils is included in many other modules for various trivial
helpers.
## What was done?
Prior work:
- https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5753
- #5486
See also #4798
This PR remove all non-quorum calculation code from llmq/utils.
Eventually it happens that easier to take everything out rather than
move Quorum Calculation to new place atm:
- new module llmq/options have a code related to various params, command
line options, spork-related etc
- llmq/utils is not included in various files which do not use any
llmq/utils code
- helper `BuildCommitmentHash` goes to llmq/commitment
- helper `BuildSignHash` goes to llmq/signing
- helper `GetLLMQParam` inlined since it's trivial (it has not been
trivial when introduced ages ago)
- removed dependency of `IsQuorumEnabled` on CQuorumManager which means
`quorumManager` deglobalization is done for 90%
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Run unit functional tests
- updated circular dependencies
`test/lint/lint-circular-dependencies.sh`
- check that llmq/utils is not included without needs to calculate
Quorums Members
```
$ grep -r include src/ 2> /dev/null | grep -v .Po: | grep -vE 'llmq/utils.(h|cpp)': | grep llmq/utils
src/evo/mnauth.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/blockprocessor.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/commitment.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/debug.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/dkgsessionhandler.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/dkgsession.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/llmq/dkgsessionmgr.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
src/rpc/quorums.cpp:#include <llmq/utils.h>
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
It is partial de-circularisation of dependencies between that includes net_processing
Classes that still depends on net_processing but should not:
- llmq/dkgsessionmgr
- llmq/signing
- llmq/instantsend
They have asynchronous processing and with current impl that's impossible to do
f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f0882a1a2bb20474648419979af6e383d refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).
In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.
Relevant IRC log:
```
17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
```
The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
rajarshimaitra:
tACK f685a13bef
mjdietzx:
crACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
LarryRuane:
Code review, test ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some headers include other heavy headers, such as `logging.h`,
`tinyformat.h`, `iostream`. These headers are heavy and increase
compilation time on scale of whole project drastically because can be
used in many other headers.
## What was done?
Moved many heavy includes from headers to cpp files to optimize
compilation time.
In some places added forward declarations if it is reasonable.
As side effect removed 2 circular dependencies:
```
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/debug"
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/dkgsession -> llmq/debug"
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run build 2 times before refactoring and after refactoring: `make clean
&& sleep 10s; time make -j18`
Before refactoring:
```
real 5m37,826s
user 77m12,075s
sys 6m20,547s
real 5m32,626s
user 76m51,143s
sys 6m24,511s
```
After refactoring:
```
real 5m18,509s
user 73m32,133s
sys 6m21,590s
real 5m14,466s
user 73m20,942s
sys 6m17,868s
```
~5% of improvement for compilation time. That's not huge, but that's
worth to get merged
There're several more refactorings TODO but better to do them later by
backports:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27636
- bitcoin/bitcoin#26286
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27238
- and maybe this one: bitcoin/bitcoin#28200
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`ConnectBlock` can fail after `ProcessSpecialTxsInBlock`, we shouldn't
be notifying too early. Same for `DisconnectBlock` but that's less of an
issue imo.
## What was done?
Move notifications to the end of `ConnectBlock`/`DisconnectBlock`. There
is no `connman` in `CChainState` and I don't want to pass it in updates
struct so I changed `NotifyMasternodeListChanged` and used `connman`
from `CDSNotificationInterface` instead.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run unit test, run testnet qt wallet
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Implementation of accepted proposal:
https://www.dashcentral.org/p/TREASURY-REALLOCATION-60-20-20
## What was done?
Once Masternode Reward Location Reallocation activates:
- Treasury is bumped to 20% of block subsidy.
- Block reward shares are immediately set to 75% for MN and 25% miners.
(Previous reallocation periods are dropped)
MN reward share should be 75% of block reward in order to represent 60%
of the block subsidy. (according to the proposal)
- `governancebudget` is returned from `getgovernanceinfo` RPC.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`block_reward_reallocation_tests`
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Motivation
CoinJoin's subsystems are initialized by variables and managers that
occupy the global context. The _extent_ to which these subsystems
entrench themselves into the codebase is difficult to assess and moving
them out of the global context forces us to enumerate the subsystems in
the codebase that rely on CoinJoin logic and enumerate the order in
which components are initialized and destroyed.
Keeping this in mind, the scope of this pull request aims to:
* Reduce the amount of CoinJoin-specific entities present in the global
scope
* Make the remaining usage of these entities in the global scope
explicit and easily searchable
## Additional Information
* The initialization of `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` is dependent on
blocks-only mode being disabled (which can be alternatively interpreted
as enabling the relay of transactions). The same applies to
`CBlockPolicyEstimator`, which `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` depends.
Therefore, `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` is only initialized if
transaction relaying is enabled and so is its scheduled maintenance
task. This can be found by looking at `init.cpp`
[here](93f8df1c31/src/init.cpp (L1681-L1683)),
[here](93f8df1c31/src/init.cpp (L2253-L2255))
and
[here](93f8df1c31/src/init.cpp (L2326-L2327)).
For this reason, `CBlockPolicyEstimator` is not a member of `CJContext`
and its usage is fulfilled by passing it as a reference when
initializing the scheduling task.
* `CJClientManager` has not used `CConnman` or `CTxMemPool` as `const`
as existing code that is outside the scope of this PR would cast away
constness, which would be unacceptable. Furthermore, some logical paths
are taken that will grind to a halt if they are stored as `const`.
Examples of such a call chains would be:
* `CJClientManager::DoMaintenance >
CCoinJoinClientManager::DoMaintenance > DoAutomaticDenominating >
CCoinJoinClientSession::DoAutomaticDenominating >
CCoinJoinClientSession::StartNewQueue > CConnman::AddPendingMasternode`
which modifies `CConnman::vPendingMasternodes`, which is non-const
behaviour
* `CJClientManager::DoMaintenance >
CCoinJoinClientManager::DoMaintenance > DoAutomaticDenominating >
CCoinJoin::IsCollateralValid > AcceptToMemoryPool` which adds a
transaction to the memory pool, which is non-const behaviour
* There were cppcheck [linter
failures](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5337#issuecomment-1685084688)
that seemed to be caused by the usage of `Assert` in
`coinjoin/client.h`. This seems to be resolved by backporting
[bitcoin#24714](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24714). (Thanks
@knst!)
* Depends on #5546
---------
Co-authored-by: Kittywhiskers Van Gogh <63189531+kittywhiskers@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
## What was done?
- remove dependency of Asset Lock txes on CCreditPool
- new case for functional tests of Asset Locks - more than one output
for Asset Lock tx.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
Slightly changes behaviour of TxMempool. Tx can be accepted in mempool
even if Asset Unlock transaction with same index is already mined. But
final consensus rules are same.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There's one type of output that potentially can be useful for bloom
filter.
It's follow-up for TODO for dashpay/dash#4857.
Asset Lock transactions have:
- standard inputs (covered by regular bloom filter implementation)
- standard outputs (covered by regular bloom filter implementation)
- special outputs that have public key to proof owing this credits on
platform and claiming it.
Asset Unlock transactions have:
- no inputs (no need bloom)
- standard outputs (covered by regular bloom filter implementation)
So far as there's only one special case, let's have this data in the
bloom filter because it can potentially help to show information such as
"Deposit to platform" on mobile clients.
## What was done?
- added special case for Asset Lock transactions for bloom filter
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests. Doesn't actually tested how bloom filter
works.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This is an implementation of DIP0027 "Credit Asset Locks".
It's a mechanism to fluidly exchange between Dash and credits.
## What was done?
This pull request includes:
- Asset Lock transaction
- Asset Unlock transaction (withdrawal)
- Credit Pool in coinbase
- Unit tests for Asset Lock/Unlock tx
- New functional test `feature_asset_locks.py`
RPC: currently locked amount (credit pool) is available through rpc call
`getblock`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
There added new unit tests for basic checks of transaction validity
(asset lock/unlock).
Also added new functional test "feature_asset_locks.py" that cover
typical cases, but not all corner cases yet.
## Breaking Changes
This feature should be activated as hard-fork because:
- It adds 2 new special transaction and one of them [asset unlock tx]
requires update consensus rulels
- It adds new data in coinbase tx (credit pool)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**To release DIP 0027**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It splits from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5150/ by
@PastaPastaPasta request.
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
f9abf4ab6d3d3e4d4b7e90723020b5422a141a6f Add logging for CValidationInterface events (Jeffrey Czyz)
6edebacb2191373e76d79a4972d6192300976096 Refactor FormatStateMessage for clarity (Jeffrey Czyz)
72f3227c83810936e7a334304e5fd7c6dab8e91b Format CValidationState properly in all cases (Jeffrey Czyz)
428ac70095253225f64462ee15c595644747f376 Add VALIDATION to BCLog::LogFlags (Jeffrey Czyz)
Pull request description:
Add logging of `CValidationInterface` callbacks using a new `VALIDATIONINTERFACE` log flag (see #12994). A separate flag is desirable as the logging can be noisy and thus may need to be disabled without affecting other logging.
This could help debug issues where there may be race conditions at play, such as #12978.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK f9abf4ab6d3d3e4d4b7e90723020b5422a141a6f
hebasto:
ACK f9abf4ab6d3d3e4d4b7e90723020b5422a141a6f
ariard:
ACK f9abf4a, only changes since 0cadb12 are replacing log indication `VALIDATIONINTERFACE` by `VALIDATION` and avoiding a forward declaration with a new include
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f9abf4ab6d3d3e4d4b7e90723020b5422a141a6f. Just suggested changes since last review (thanks!)
Tree-SHA512: 3e0f6e2c8951cf46fbad3ff440971d95d526df2a52a2e4d6452a82785c63d53accfdabae66b0b30e2fe0b00737f8d5cb717edbad1460b63acb11a72c8f5d4236
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Move `BuildSimplifiedDiff` to the place it's actually used. This also
resolves 3 circular dependencies we have atm.
## What was done?
mostly trivial move-only changes
## How Has This Been Tested?
it compiles and linter is happy locally
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec Refactor: Replace SigningProvider pointers with unique_ptrs (Andrew Chow)
3afe53c4039103670cec5f9cace897ead76e20a8 Cleanup: Drop unused GUI learnRelatedScripts method (Andrew Chow)
e2f02aa59e3402048269362ff692d49a6df35cfd Refactor: Copy CWallet signals and print function to LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
c729afd0a3b74a3943e4c359270beaf3e6ff8a7b Box the wallet: Add multiple keyman maps and loops (Andrew Chow)
4977c30d59e88a3e5ee248144bcc023debcd895b refactor: define a UINT256_ONE global constant (Andrew Chow)
415afcccd3e5583defdb76e3a280f48e98983301 HD Split: Avoid redundant upgrades (Andrew Chow)
01b4511206e399981a77976deb15785d18db46ae Make UpgradeKeyMetadata work only on LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
4a7e43e8460127a40a7895519587399feff3b682 Store p2sh scripts in AddAndGetDestinationForScript (Andrew Chow)
501acb5538008d98abe79288b92040bc186b93f3 Always try to sign for all pubkeys in multisig (Andrew Chow)
81610eddbc57c46ae243f45d73e715d509f53a6c List output types in an array in order to be iterated over (Andrew Chow)
eb81fc3ee58d3e88af36d8091b9e4017a8603b3c Refactor: Allow LegacyScriptPubKeyMan to be null (Andrew Chow)
fadc08ad944cad42e805228cdd58e0332f4d7184 Locking: Lock cs_KeyStore instead of cs_wallet in legacy keyman (Andrew Chow)
f5be479694d4dbaf59eef562d80fbeacb3bb7dc1 wallet: Improve CWallet:MarkDestinationsDirty (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Continuation of wallet boxes project.
Actually makes ScriptPubKeyMan an interface which LegacyScriptPubkeyMan. Moves around functions and things from CWallet into LegacyScriptPubKeyMan so that they are actually separate things without circular dependencies.
***
Introducing the `ScriptPubKeyMan` (short for ScriptPubKeyManager) for managing scriptPubKeys and their associated scripts and keys. This functionality is moved over from `CWallet`. Instead, `CWallet` will have a pointer to a `ScriptPubKeyMan` for every possible address type, internal and external. It will fetch the correct `ScriptPubKeyMan` as necessary. When fetching new addresses, it chooses the `ScriptPubKeyMan` based on address type and whether it is change. For signing, it takes the script and asks each `ScriptPubKeyMan` for whether that `ScriptPubKeyMan` considers that script `IsMine`, whether it has that script, or whether it is able to produce a signature for it. If so, the `ScriptPubKeyMan` will provide a `SigningProvider` to the caller which will use that in order to sign.
There is currently one `ScriptPubKeyMan` - the `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`. Each `CWallet` will have only one `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` with the pointers for all of the address types and change pointing to this `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`. It is created when the wallet is loaded and all keys and metadata are loaded into it instead of `CWallet`. The `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` is primarily made up of all of the key and script management that used to be in `CWallet`. For convenience, `CWallet` has a `GetLegacyScriptPubKeyMan` which will return the `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` or a `nullptr` if it does not have one (not yet implemented, but callers will check for the `nullptr`). For purposes of signing, `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`'s `GetSigningProvider` will return itself rather than a separate `SigningProvider`. This will be different for future `ScriptPubKeyMan`s.
The `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` will also handle the importing and exporting of keys and scripts instead of `CWallet`. As such, a number of RPCs have been limited to work only if a `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` can be retrieved from the wallet. These RPCs are `sethdseed`, `addmultisigaddress`, `importaddress`, `importprivkey`, `importpubkey`, `importmulti`, `dumpprivkey`, and `dumpwallet`. Other RPCs which relied on the wallet for scripts and keys have been modified in order to take the `SigningProvider` retrieved from the `ScriptPubKeyMan` for a given script.
Overall, these changes should not effect how everything actually works and the user should experience no difference between having this change and not having it. As such, no functional tests were changed, and the only unit tests changed were those that were directly accessing `CWallet` functions that have been removed.
This PR is the last step in the [Wallet Structure Changes](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Class-Structure-Changes).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-utACK 3f373659d7
Sjors:
re-utACK 3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec (it still compiles on macOS after https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17261#discussion_r370377070)
meshcollider:
Tested re-ACK 3f373659d732a5b1e5fdc692a45b2b8179f66bec
Tree-SHA512: f8e2b8d9efa750b617691e8702d217ec4c33569ec2554a060141d9eb9b9a3a5323e4216938e2485c44625d7a6e0925d40dea1362b3af9857cf08860c2f344716
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Avoid lots of static_cast's from enums to underlying types. Communicate
intention better
## What was done?
implement c++23 inspired ToUnderlying, then see std::to_underlying and
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/underlying_type; Then, we use
this instead of static_casts for enums -> underlying type
## How Has This Been Tested?
make check
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
e20c72f9f076681def325b5b5fa53bccda2b0eab Fire TransactionRemovedFromMempool from mempool (251)
Pull request description:
This pull request fires TransactionRemovedFromMempool callbacks from the mempool and cleans up a bunch of code.
It also resolves the `txmempool -> validation -> validationinterface -> txmempool` circular dependency.
Ideally, `validationinterface` is a dumb component that doesn't have any knowledge of the sub-systems it sends its notifications to. The commit that aims to resolve this circular dependency by moving `txmempool` specific code out of `validationinterface` to `txmempool` where it belongs.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e20c72f9f076681def325b5b5fa53bccda2b0eab
Tree-SHA512: 354c3ff1113b21a0b511d80d604edfe3846dddae3355e43d1387f68906e54bf5dc01e7c029edc0b8e635b500b2ab97ee50362e2486eb4319f7347ee9a9e6cef3
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
minimizing global uses
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Started the deglobalization, a future PR should be done to continue this
deglobalization
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
none
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* llmq: move initialization logic to 'LLMQContext', add unique pointer to NodeContext
* llmq: add aliases to LLMQ globals, expose them to RPC via LLMQContext
* rpc: replace most global invocations with LLMQContext aliases
* rpc: replace quorum RPC global invocations with LLMQContext aliases
* llmq: replace individual global member arguments with context pointer
* llmq: pass aliased context pointer instead of individual globals in tests
* llmq: move BLS worker to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move DKG debug manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move DKG session manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move quorum share manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move quorum signing manager to LLMQContext, remove global
ff59bcd3213ef61f2167c0aa60fcaf5afbc20c61 gui: Drop PeerTableModel dependency to ClientModel (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Class `PeerTableModel` doesn't actually depend on `ClientModel`.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
Code Review ACK ff59bcd321
hebasto:
ACK ff59bcd3213ef61f2167c0aa60fcaf5afbc20c61, tested on Linux Mint 19.3. No changes in behavior are observed.
Tree-SHA512: 29fa3c316c05b8f7b9340e5859bbb8c3a0b826aa7c865c892cfa13b5ad30f822fcaae4e01555f7860cd1727f20b7ef555a808235522a04a6eebaaa7b605f8595
