6f82a56171 feat: add option to AsyncSignIfMember to allow signing same requestID on different msgHashes (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Please see: https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/ehf-activation-issues.55146/ for a description of this issue
## What was done?
Allow re-signing specifically for EHF messages, this is important as due to rotation, and duplicate requestIDs a member will refuse to re-sign when they participate in a later quorum.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Devnet deployed with a mix of this version, older versions and current v21.0
## Breaking Changes
This doesn't introduce any breaking changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a758e6363901624d8540983ad09085d47a33fe61e8e576ec4317b051a0f988efb983bd06d9894bcce19c9f587ad703022ce00ceddd3760d7c9d382878f40c2d7
6f82a56171 feat: add option to AsyncSignIfMember to allow signing same requestID on different msgHashes (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Please see: https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/ehf-activation-issues.55146/ for a description of this issue
## What was done?
Allow re-signing specifically for EHF messages, this is important as due to rotation, and duplicate requestIDs a member will refuse to re-sign when they participate in a later quorum.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Devnet deployed with a mix of this version, older versions and current v21.0
## Breaking Changes
This doesn't introduce any breaking changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a758e6363901624d8540983ad09085d47a33fe61e8e576ec4317b051a0f988efb983bd06d9894bcce19c9f587ad703022ce00ceddd3760d7c9d382878f40c2d7
3783b70129 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Bumped protocol version to 70233
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3783b70129
knst:
utACK 3783b70129
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
3783b70129 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Bumped protocol version to 70233
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3783b70129
knst:
utACK 3783b70129
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
0f239203a8 partial bitcoin#24169: Add --enable-c++20 option (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a3b79267e0 merge bitcoin#20744: Use std::filesystem. Remove Boost Filesystem & System (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
be7ac493d0 merge bitcoin#24167: consistently use fsbridge:: for ifstream / ofstream (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7ffea4348f merge bitcoin#24104: Make compatible with boost 1.78 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7c270e6883 merge bitcoin#24026: Block unsafe std::string fs::path conversion copy_file calls (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b0d2484a0b merge bitcoin#23522: Improve fs::PathToString documentation (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
20d359b570 partial bitcoin#23469: Remove Boost build note from build-unix.md (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
193f6fde2e merge bitcoin#23446: Mention that BerkeleyDB is for legacy wallet in build-unix (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ecfac10b8e merge bitcoin#22937: Forbid calling unsafe fs::path(std::string) constructor and fs::path::string() method (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
23fe7e2f07 chore: dashify symbols in some unit tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
28b96a071d merge bitcoin#22840: fix unoptimized libraries in depends (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6085
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6137
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6150
## Breaking Changes
None observed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 0f239203a8
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0f239203a8
Tree-SHA512: 4b8f0ae55185ece27d8084a5339196b7ed993c8138f4c59a0db3e16729d4edf4a59a68a8c7309c32df57734c07182821c4878b55c253da5df763204ad7158426
21f174aff1 feat: improve query categorisation in Qt App (Konstantin Akimov)
c863473286 test: add spending asset unlock tx in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
1fb67ece0e feat: make a support of Qt app to show Platform Transfer transaction as a new type of transaction (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Transfers from platform have incorrectly shown amount in Dash Core wallet app.
They also shown in Qt app as self-send that is not completely true.
## What was done?
Added new type of transaction to Qt App, added a filter for its type, fixed calculation of output for tx records.
As well added a new type of transaction `platform-transfer` in rpc output of `gettransaction` RPC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Make a Platform Transfer transaction on RegTest and check it in Dash Core
Helper to see it: export dpath=/tmp/dash_func_test_PATHPATH/ ; src/qt/dash-qt -regtest -conf=$dpath/node0/dash.conf -datadir=$dpath/node0/ -debug=0 -debuglogfile=/dev/stdout
## Breaking Changes
There's new type of transaction "platform-transfer" in rpc output of `gettransaction`.
**This PR DOES NOT change any consensus rules.**
Breaking changes that makes withdrawal transaction immature is moved to https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6128
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec2a54a910f121ad30ff8e94cf17080b5b3c651872e9bc3de9ec0924ca7f7a0e526b74b05cde26aaf860e3809e67f66142112319a69c216527e5bcb1b8a2b8f6
f22ade31b9 tests: more strict test for withrawal 1000 and minor improvements (UdjinM6)
4ad18f64f5 fix: properly test hard limit of 1000 dash (Konstantin Akimov)
a2fe2b27d9 test: minor improvements for credit pool functional test (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
DIP for Credit Pool says:
```
The withdrawal should not be mined if:
* It requests more DASH than the credit pool contains
* It requests more than 1000 DASH
* The credit pool contains more than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than a 10% reduction in the credit pool over the 576-block window
* The credit pool contains less than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than 100 DASH being removed from the pool over the 576-block window
```
Though, current functional test for asset locks improperly test this case, because threshold for big withdrawal happens by 10%, not 1000 dash.
## What was done?
Improvements for functional asset lock test to actually test a limit 1000 dash, not just 10%
## How Has This Been Tested?
See changes
## Breaking Changes
N/A, changes only for tests
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK f22ade31b9
Tree-SHA512: 2fdbfa85a3fc41683d68d1577916178ad686ccf0fba6abb22dc84a7ad69e0d44f876e371a24935c5167baa5491000662cc98cc1cd205e3817f0ffc65d2b4953d
b73f48f3b9 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22057: test: use MiniWallet (P2PK mode) for feature_dersig.py (MarcoFalke)
d5a8d5e6a0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22048: test: MiniWallet: introduce enum type for output mode (MarcoFalke)
f4cd20b115 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21945: test: add P2PK support to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
7be6db6dca docs: add an explanation for vsize in MiniWallet (Konstantin Akimov)
5d10b41302 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21840: test: Misc refactor to get rid of &foo[0] raw pointers (MarcoFalke)
7522ee9868 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21900: test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (MarcoFalke)
c6f603c26f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21897: rpc: adjust incorrect RPCHelpMan types (MarcoFalke)
1dffe3ab9f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21867: test: use MiniWallet for p2p_blocksonly.py (MarcoFalke)
81d21eea14 Merge #21557: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests (MarcoFalke)
cc169c2457 partial Merge #20842: docs: consolidate typo & url fixing (MarcoFalke)
2be1604405 Merge #20459: rpc: Fail to return undocumented return values (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Backports from v22 bitcoin.
Mostly related to MiniWallet and RPC improvements, see commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK b73f48f3b9
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b73f48f3b9
Tree-SHA512: 588f3a30697c0d77dadcc463aba71a00bf26eeef41b0cb8b9197799a217ebeb1d1ce7b5021ccc4576f0e9ca0e75ad840820cdc682fe8f120596788a528727a0b
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
56cc39d178 chore: bump version to 21.0.2 (pasta)
5619c8f5fd docs: add release notes for v21.0.1 and archive v21.0.0 (pasta)
9e80d128c0 Merge #6163: fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (pasta)
e10c5c9579 Merge #6160: feat: add sbom and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0c11f0e99b8542df013021bed639e86e188b6a20;
kwvg:
utACK 0c11f0e99b
Tree-SHA512: c8f81678ba9a742b3e1a674ffc291e30d63900fd1e1328bf5528210d0a983b9c5c9b3960ce76fd6ed8fd7014a92e09dcfa093bcd7a4bad2e3ea2d5e849ee28bc
56cc39d178 chore: bump version to 21.0.2 (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
my bad... forgot
## What was done?
Bump version in configure.ac
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 56cc39d178
Tree-SHA512: 7f85d3521e7a264d212a678a3e7ac6d39fceeee209433a02f3c05dcd9dec28ce2893e75a7754331d913ec8215ddda205cf0fbc5c0e0c02eb1afeb899635f29f5
5619c8f5fd docs: add release notes for v21.0.1 and archive v21.0.0 (pasta)
9e80d128c0 Merge #6163: fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (pasta)
e10c5c9579 Merge #6160: feat: add sbom and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Backport PRs for v21.0.1
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
See CI
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
kwvg:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
UdjinM6:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
Tree-SHA512: 42c1e31319775e5800da2d82af00cae3aa0cee3baadd0123a809efc246d4ca5d0e6a4166b574e6ddebf66c0a80f4ee1655caff085f1687bb533889414a9fd4cf
3468ab34d1 fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mobile client (without full blockchain) can't receive transactions before they are mined in the block.
## What was done?
Fixed a condition "is an addr relay" to "not a block relay".
It's an alternate solution for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6162
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested with hashengineering - it works!
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK [3468ab3](3468ab34d1); no diff
kwvg:
utACK 3468ab34d1
Tree-SHA512: 6ad257a72be0f2fd4d7a8e3674d537e2a2c5f0c7c1bdfdf825403d8cb2975261bcf4574949fb02a16de76762d3f30b40e094be448cfa4ee6bae9f1f5be5f44d5
9178e8a75f feat: add smob and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Docker provenance refers to the origin and history of Docker images, including how they were built, modified, and by whom. An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a detailed list of all components in a software application, providing transparency about libraries, dependencies, and versions used, which is crucial for security and compliance.
## What was done?
Add SBOM and provenance to docker build; this may allow some level of validation that GitHub actions is actually doing what it says it is.
See this for more information https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/attestations/
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building with buildx with sbom and provenance flags locally
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 9178e8a75f
Tree-SHA512: 6e3f35a0b30f002e2d5d80d6dd18ee554a1c15c62c1d4cbe1185f38977f55a199998515cf5bb9a027670f068f3d56ef33faa062d8c4122a886375d00afe6bf2f
3468ab34d1 fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mobile client (without full blockchain) can't receive transactions before they are mined in the block.
## What was done?
Fixed a condition "is an addr relay" to "not a block relay".
It's an alternate solution for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6162
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested with hashengineering - it works!
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK [3468ab3](3468ab34d1); no diff
kwvg:
utACK 3468ab34d1
Tree-SHA512: 6ad257a72be0f2fd4d7a8e3674d537e2a2c5f0c7c1bdfdf825403d8cb2975261bcf4574949fb02a16de76762d3f30b40e094be448cfa4ee6bae9f1f5be5f44d5
9178e8a75f feat: add smob and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Docker provenance refers to the origin and history of Docker images, including how they were built, modified, and by whom. An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a detailed list of all components in a software application, providing transparency about libraries, dependencies, and versions used, which is crucial for security and compliance.
## What was done?
Add SBOM and provenance to docker build; this may allow some level of validation that GitHub actions is actually doing what it says it is.
See this for more information https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/attestations/
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building with buildx with sbom and provenance flags locally
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 9178e8a75f
Tree-SHA512: 6e3f35a0b30f002e2d5d80d6dd18ee554a1c15c62c1d4cbe1185f38977f55a199998515cf5bb9a027670f068f3d56ef33faa062d8c4122a886375d00afe6bf2f
764b3a3239 test: disable mocktime in p2p_eviction.py (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
No idea why CI has no issues but `p2p_eviction.py` fails locally after #6103 (my guess is that it's because P2PInterface can't work with mocktime properly).
## What was done?
Disable mocktime in `p2p_eviction.py`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests locally
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a9be9032c7697ff47b2256395f0fb126deeccd9bee6f101a71a1f88e1f25b08fa039ed5eb4cd4b1b308e8136d64510a544b7019ed9147ea2e80f8cb83ff25412
e775b74d5e docs: add release notes for 6147 (pasta)
127a4d23a5 feat: aim to have 2 onion connections when possible, guard them from eviction (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In the past I've noticed that even when using `-proxy` over tor, I wouldn't actually gain any onion connections over time. This is even worse when using -onion. Sure it may expose an onion service, but you wouldn't gain any onion connections (in my experience)!
The goal here is to minimize easy-ish censorship and improve network-wide resistance to partitioning. It is not unimaginable that port 9999 could be blocked at large scale. This could potentially result in severe partitioning, and subsequent issues. In an attempt to avoid this, we should always try to have at least 2 outbound onion connections when at all possible. Hopefully this also makes onion addresses gossip better.
This also adds a benefit of p2p encryption for these peers. As a result, there is improved plausible deniability that you produced a transaction, as it is possible you received it over onion and simply rebroadcast it over ipv4.
I don't think there is any real downside to this patch, stuff like masternode / quorum connections will still always happen over ipv4, but with this, blocks and transactions would continue to propogate across the network even if (non-onion) ipv4 traffic was all dropped.
Arguably, it's not **ideal** to send so much traffic over tor, but hopefully as latency is higher, we will generally receive messages over ipv4 first and therefor not request them over the onion connections.
## What was done?
We will always try to get 2 onion nodes (full or block only); and guard them from eviction
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run a node; see over time that you start with 0 onion nodes, and over time you progress to having two of them!
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: cd15565751ae845302c71cac084ffba66340033d379ffa78d0aa6fa4ad8f65ddeccd55fa623dfaf7daeed5e38b5b2ec27683991275cf2b6edfbd8e114a1bfe60
In the past I've noticed that even when using `-proxy` over tor, I wouldn't actually gain any onion connections over time. This is even worse when using -onion. Sure it may expose an onion service, but you wouldn't gain any onion connections!
The goal here is to minimize easy-ish censorship and improve network-wide resistance to partitioning. It is not unimaginable that port 9999 could be blocked at large scale. This could potentially result in severe partitioning, and subsequent issues. In an attempt to avoid this, we should always try to have at least 2 outbound onion connections when at all possible. Hopefully this also makes onion addresses gossip better.
I don't think there is any real downside to this patch, stuff like masternode / quorum connections will still always happen over ipv4, but with this, blocks and transactions would continue to propogate across the network even if (non-onion) ipv4 traffic was all dropped.
This also adds a benefit of p2p encryption for these peers. As a result, there is improved plausible deniability that you produced a transaction, as it is possible you received it over onion and simply rebroadcast it over ipv4.
Arguably, it's not **ideal** to send so much traffic over tor, but hopefully as latency is higher, we will generally receive messages over ipv4 first and therefor not request them over the onion connections.
98a33939fd chore: set release to true (pasta)
cd0a3a6cc6 Merge #6154: chore: remove trailing whitespaces in release notes (pasta)
6bc60a7236 Merge #6151: chore: update seeds for v21 release (pasta)
88e949aa1b Merge #6146: chore: bump assumevalid, minchainwork, checkpoints, chaintxdata (pasta)
cc14427ccd Merge #6144: docs: release notes for v21.0.0 (pasta)
0a8ece1fd2 Merge #6122: chore: translations 2024-07 (pasta)
146d24401f Merge #6140: feat: harden all sporks on mainnet to current values (pasta)
024d272eb9 Merge #6126: feat: enable EHF activation of MN_RR on mainnet (pasta)
e780b3d48d Merge #6125: docs: update manpages for 21.0 (pasta)
5ede23c2ba Merge #6118: docs: add release notes notifying change of default branch to `develop` (pasta)
1b6fe9c720 Merge #6117: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
27d20beda8 Merge #6116: fix: mitigate crashes associated with some upgradetohd edge cases (pasta)
db828177bf Merge #6106: feat: create new composite quorum-command platformsign (pasta)
a45e6df58b Merge #6104: fix: adjust incorrect parameter description that says there is a default that doesn't exist (pasta)
7330982631 Merge #6100: feat: make whitelist works with composite commands for platform needs (pasta)
9998ffd92b Merge #6096: feat: split type of error in submitchainlock - return enum in CL verifying code (pasta)
cdf7a25012 Merge #6095: fix: createwallet to require 'load_on_startup' for descriptor wallets (pasta)
c1c2c55690 Merge #6092: fix: mixing for partially unlocked descriptor wallets (pasta)
117548660d Merge #6073: feat: add logging for RPC HTTP requests: command, user, http-code, time of running (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Suppressed changes from be83865959 so the diff is empty.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
ACK 158cf86795bbcf27a5ee7ccc4fd8072c8db05c4c; no diff
knst:
ACK 158cf86795
Tree-SHA512: 3310a39fbcb45bdf09f885fe77ba769c0a715869a3bb287eaf0f2cf54b35a7e1f832c88df3bd31097eabf2d375515c1b87ff05e0c3282cef642833a154c42bbe
