fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71 test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Headers and block sync should eventually converge to the same result, regardless of whether the peers treat each other as "inbound" or "outbound".
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
Thus remove the `connect_nodes_bi` workaround from the rpc_invalidateblock test.
Conveniently, this also closes#16453. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16444#issuecomment-514801708 for rationale
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71
Tree-SHA512: b3614c66a205823df73f64d19cacfbec269beb5db52ff79004d746e17d7c0dfb43ab9785fdddc97e2a76fe76286c8c605b34df3dda4a2bf5be035f01169ae89a
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
faa1e0fb1712b1f94334e42794163f79988270fd qt: test: Create at most one testing setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is assumed that ideally only one BasicTestingSetup exists at any point in time for each process (due to use of globals).
This assumption is violated in the GUI tests, as a testing setup is created as the first step of the `main` function and then (sometimes) another one for the following test cases.
So, the gui tests create two testing setups:
* `BasicTestingSetup` in `main` (added in fa4a04a5a942d582c62773d815c7e1e9897975d0)
* a testing setup for individual test cases
Avoid that by destructing the testing setup in main after creation and then move the explicit `ECC_Stop` to the only places where it is needed (before and after `apptests`).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK faa1e0fb1712b1f94334e42794163f79988270fd
Tree-SHA512: b8edceb7e2a8749e1de3ea80bc20b6fb7d4390bf366bb9817206ada3dc8669a91416f4803c22a0e6c636c514e0c858dcfe04523221f8851b10deaf472f107d82
* test: Add BRR and DAT unit tests
* test: Drop feature_block_reward_reallocation.py
* change copyright
* remove trivially removable includes
* use constexpr, remove empty statement
* Don't use BOOST_ASSERT, fix bug?
Not sure if this was a bug, as it does an assignment. If this isn't a bug please add a comment / explanation
```
BOOST_ASSERT(::ChainActive().Tip()->nVersion = 536870912);
```
* deduplicate all the things (also test all activation periods)
* use try_emplace, and remove some tempararies
* update threshold to be inline with dynamic
* explicitly include map, vector, remove now unneeded base58.h
* remove unused param, and replace raw loop with range loop
* re: Don't use BOOST_ASSERT, fix bug?
* Make TestChain<smth>Setup in dynamic_activation_thresholds_tests more general
* Specify min level activation tests correctly
Co-authored-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
bfe1ba2f5b36056e0c41edf8206b93d3d83098df rel-builds: Specify core.abbrev for git-rev-parse (Carl Dong)
27e63e01cce368d67092de8f0c736927d6f6aa69 build: Accomodate makensis v2.x (Carl Dong)
1f2c39a30e0f82046c7aecddfda3eb99cb536816 guix: Remove logical cores requirement (Carl Dong)
a4f6ffa71e335d4b2a6bf525b7f416968f9cd9f7 lint: Also enable source statements for non-gitian (Carl Dong)
d256f91cb1b0d6ff5170106b99b0266cbe51f5a2 rel-builds: Directly deploy win installer to OUTDIR (Carl Dong)
fa791da02f9684e3fd554b687fb692ae6a23d65a nsis: Specify OutFile path only once (Carl Dong)
14701604d0904bc5bbf1c67de08f8ee6d3215523 guix: Expose GIT_COMMON_DIR in container as readonly (Carl Dong)
f5a6ac4f48b18f93050d77bcb23f9cf45ec34647 guix: Make source tarball using git-archive (Carl Dong)
395c1137f630dc495ffb2752a23bc1dfd470ee53 gitian: Limit sourced script to just assignments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #18556
Related: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17595#discussion_r399728721
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK bfe1ba2f5b36056e0c41edf8206b93d3d83098df - I agree with Carl, and am going to merge this. I'd like for Linux Guix builds to be working again, and we can rebase #18818.
Tree-SHA512: c87ada7e3de17ca0b692a91029b86573442ded5780fc081c214773f6b374a0cdbeaf6f6898c36669c2e247ee32aa7f82defb1180f8decac52c65f0c140f18674
2aa48edec0101f8a77a2189244fc62722ff7a123 refactor: Drop unused ${WRAP_DIR}/${HOST} directory (Hennadii Stepanov)
1362be044724bb49d785ca2e296a3b43343c1690 build: Drop make dist in gitian builds (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
After the merge of #18331, the packaged source tarball is created by `git archive`, but the binaries are built from another one which is made by `make dist`.
With this PR the only source tarball, created by `git archive`, is used both for binaries building and for packaging to users.
Close#16588.
Close#18547.
As a good side-effect, #18349 becomes redundant.
**Change in behavior**
The following variables 1b151e3ffc/configure.ac (L2-L6)
are no longer used for naming of directories and tarballs.
Instead of them the gitian descriptors use a git tag (if available) or a commit hash.
---
Also a small refactor commit picked from #18404.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 2aa48edec0101f8a77a2189244fc62722ff7a123
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2aa48edec0101f8a77a2189244fc62722ff7a123
fanquake:
ACK 2aa48edec0101f8a77a2189244fc62722ff7a123 - I've had a quick look over this, and don't want to block merging if this actually gets as closer to finally having this all sorted out. Obviously we've still got #18741, and after speaking to Carl this morning, there will likely be even more changes after that (not Guix specific).
Tree-SHA512: d3b16f87e48d1790a3264940c28acd5d881bfd10f3ce94fb0c8a6af76d8039289d01e0cd4972adac49ae24362857251f6c1e5e09e3e9fbf636c10708b4015a7c
1ac454a3844b9b8389de0f660fa9455c0efa7140 Enable ShellCheck rules (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Enable some simple ShellCheck rules.
Note for reviewers: `bash` and `shellcheck` on macOS are different from ones on Ubuntu.
For local tests the latest `shellcheck` version 0.6.0 should be used (see #15166).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
utACK 1ac454a3844b9b8389de0f660fa9455c0efa7140
dongcarl:
utACK 1ac454a
fanquake:
ACK 1ac454a3844b9b8389de0f660fa9455c0efa7140
Tree-SHA512: 8d0a3a5c09fe1a0c22120178f5e6b80f81f746f8c3356b7701ff301c117acb2edea8fe08f08fb54ed73f94b1617515fb239fa28e7ab4121f74872e6494b6f20e
510c6532ba Extract ParseDescriptorRange (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and
to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
ACKs for commit 510c65:
meshcollider:
Oh apologies, yes. Thanks :) utACK 510c6532ba
MarcoFalke:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
sipa:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
Tree-SHA512: b1f0792bfaa163890a20654a0fc2c4c4a996659916bf5f4a495662436b39326692a1a0c825caafd859e48c05f5dd1865c4f7c28092be5074edda3c94f94f9f8b
ca253f6ebf Make deriveaddresses use stop/[start,stop] notation for ranges (Pieter Wuille)
1675b7ce55 Use stop/[start,stop] notation in importmulti desc range (Pieter Wuille)
4566011631 Add support for stop/[start,stop] ranges to scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
6b9f45e81b Support ranges arguments in RPC help (Pieter Wuille)
7aa6a8aefb Add ParseRange function to parse args of the form int/[int,int] (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This introduces a consistent notation for RPC arguments in `scantxoutset`, `importmulti`, and `deriveaddresses`, either:
* `"range" : int` to just specify the end of the range
* `"range" : [int,int]` to specify both the begin and the end of the range.
For `scantxoutset`, this is a backward compatible new feature. For the two other RPCs, it's an incompatible change, but neither of them has been in a release so far. Because of that non-released reason, this only makes sense in 0.18, in my opinion.
I suggest this as an alternative to #15496, which only makes `deriveaddresses` compatible with `importmulti`, but not with the existing `scantxoutset` RPC. I also think `[int,int]` is more convenient than `{"start":int,"stop":int}`.
I realize this is technically a feature added to `scantxoutset` after the feature freeze. If desired, I'll drop the `scantxoutset` changes.
Tree-SHA512: 1cbebb90cf34f106786dbcec7afbf3f43fb8b7e46cc7e6763faf1bc1babf12375a1b3c3cf86ee83c21ed2171d99b5a2f60331850bc613db25538c38b6a056676
* instantsend: Avoid writing IS locks for unknown txes
* instantsend: Allow a competing tx into mempool if there is an islock waiting for it
* use try_emplace
* Hold cs_main while calling ResetBlockFailureFlags
fa8489a15511f61a372473927e73c34692bbec23 test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx (MarcoFalke)
77770d95e2838d7665fa8f621e9e83d79f9b3196 test: Properly serialize BIP34 coinbase height (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This adds a test for BIP30 to check that duplicate txs can exist in the blockchain given the first one was completely spent when the second one is added. (Requested by ajtowns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16333#issuecomment-508604071)
We can not add a test that a later duplicate tx overwrites a previous one, because BIP30 is always enforced on regtest. If someone feels strongly about such a test, some Bitcoin Core code would have to be modified, which can be done in a follow up pull request.
Also, add a commit to fix the BIP34 test failures reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14633#issue-227712540
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa8489a15511f61a372473927e73c34692bbec23
Tree-SHA512: c707d0bdc93937263876b603425b53322a2a9f9ec3f50716ae2fa9de8ddc644beb22b26c1bfde7f4aab102633e096b354ef380db919176bd2cb44a2828f884aa
d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876 [test] walletcreatefundedpsbt: check RBF is disabled when -walletrbf=0 (Sjors Provoost)
9ed062b5685eb6227d694572cb0f7bfbcc151b36 [doc] rpc: remove "fallback to" from RBF default help (Sjors Provoost)
4fcb698bc2bb74171cd3a14b94f9882d8e19e9fb [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: use wallet default RBF (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The `walletcreatefundedpsbt` RPC call currently ignores `-walletrbf` and defaults to not use RBF. This PR fixes that.
This PR also replaces UniValue in `ConstructTransaction` with a `bool` in preparation of moving this helper method out of the RPC codebase entirely. This may be a bit overkill, but does slightly simplify it.
Fixes#15878
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876
l2a5b1:
re-ACK d6b3640
MarcoFalke:
ACK d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876
Tree-SHA512: 55b9bccd1ef36b54f6b34793017dc0721103099ad3761b3b04862291ee13d6915915d4dbb1a8567924fa56e5e95dfe10eec070e06701610e70c87f8ea92b2a00
fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2 test: Remove incorrect and unused try-block in assert_debug_log (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This try block has accidentally been added by me in fa3e9f7627784ee00980590e5bf044a0e1249999.
It was unused all the time, but commit 6011c9d72d1df5c2cd09de6f85c21eb4f7eb1ba8 added a `return` in the finally block, muting all exceptions.
This can be tested by adding an `assert False` after any `with ...assert_debug_log...:` line.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2
ryanofsky:
utACK fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2. I didn't know returning inside a `finally` block would cancel pending exceptions or return values, but I guess this makes sense and is a good thing to be aware of.
Tree-SHA512: 47ed0165062060e9af055a3e92f1a529cd41d00476bfad64e3cd141ae084d22f926a343bb1257717e164e15459a59ab66aed198c95d18bf780d8cb0b76aa3298
6011c9d72d1df5c2cd09de6f85c21eb4f7eb1ba8 QA: fix rpc_setban.py race (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The new `rpc_setban.py` test failes regularly on CIs due to a race between injecting the ban and testing the log "on the other side".
The problem is, that the test immediately after the `addnode` command on node0 checks for the `dropped (banned)` entry on node1 (without giving some time).
Adding a 2 seconds sleep seems to solve the race (I guess there is no better event-driven delay).
Example of a failed test: https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?ansilog=bf743910-103f-4b54-9a97-960c471061bd.log#l2906
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 680f8ea3e5ddb07e93f824f1aeff4a459e25e6c14715a39fc7670e50506d7cf25925348672c5c2d8ba3e1243ccf5effbc2456bcd094fb96868349f8d26e008f1
c4606b84329d760d7cee144bebe05807857edaae Add Travis check for single parameter constructors not marked "explicit" (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Make single parameter constructors `explicit` (C++11).
Rationale from the developer notes:
> - By default, declare single-argument constructors `explicit`.
> - *Rationale*: This is a precaution to avoid unintended conversions that might
> arise when single-argument constructors are used as implicit conversion
> functions.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c4606b84329d760d7cee144bebe05807857edaae
Tree-SHA512: 3e6fd51935fd93b2604b2188664692973d0897469f814cd745b5147d71b99ea5d73c1081cfde9f6393f51f56969e412fcda35d2d54e938a3235b8d40945f31fd
9f9db39041 QA/mininode: Send all headers upfront in send_blocks_and_test to avoid sending an unconnected one (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
While this doesn't currently trigger any problems, the network protocol does expect headers to be sent connectable in normal circumstances, and if too many are sent out of order will disconnect the peer.
ACKs for commit 9f9db3:
Tree-SHA512: 25b88718e4ba3d31aed2de7ece23fab9a0737fd6536c5e618ea8eb5a3a217dab0dffaebc4892df7993bcea7efb7c4fb5085fabebe99535b8f7fdde3c19df54ff
fa08c5cb99 test_runner: Move pruning back to extended (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts fafb55e2c2b257efd4e584f72adf62401c01d573, since the test is still too slow to run with asan enabled on a network hdd
ACKs for commit fa08c5:
jnewbery:
utACK fa08c5cb993f07fd4309f2a6bd9ef4696f07e24c
jonasschnelli:
utACK fa08c5cb993f07fd4309f2a6bd9ef4696f07e24c
Tree-SHA512: de16786b9d507a72210805c3e9eef360e5fc3d4bc3a81f7175b6cc70d1bc426cde7ac97bc0d1a0d4e0813067e1e251c2dd49256552cc6b52446b475251b7c32b
f402012cc fixup: Fix prunning test (João Barbosa)
97f517dd8 Fix RPC/pruneblockchain returned prune height (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The help of `pruneblockchain` tells us that the return value is `Height of the last block pruned.`,... but the implementation naively returns the provided input `height` and therefore not respecting that pruning can't be done on all possible blockheight due to the fact that we only prune complete blockfiles (which combine multiple blocks).
This fixes the return value to actually return the correct prune height.
ACKs for commit f40201:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f402012ccfc596d7d94851dabbf386c278ff5335
Tree-SHA512: 88c910030ffb83196663e5ebebc29d036fcdbbb2ab266e4538991867924a61bacd8361c1fbf294a0ea7e02347ae183d792f10a10b8f6187e8a4c4c6e4124d7e6
* merge 15638: Move CheckTransaction from lib_server to lib_consensus
* merge 15638: Move policy settings to new src/policy/settings unit
* merge 15638: Move rpc utility methods to rpc/util
* merge 15638: Move rpc rawtransaction util functions to rpc/rawtransaction_util.cpp
* merge 15638: Move several units into common libraries
* merge 15638: Move wallet load functions to wallet/load unit
* merge 15638: Document src subdirectories and different libraries
* [build] Add several util units (cleanup)
* build: resolve missing declarations by re-specifying headers
e91f0a7af2 doc: Remove travis badge from readme (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The readme(s) are shipped in the released source-code archive, in which case the travis badge is useless since it doesn't link to the travis result of the correct commit/tag/branch. GitHub embeds the correct links for each tag or commit that ci ran on, so we don't need this link in the readme.
ACKs for commit e91f0a:
hebasto:
ACK e91f0a7af2aec7d924f00da25c69d8f46e0dd33d
Tree-SHA512: 860435a58b38a9bd0bc62a1e74b3a63c138c9a2f09008a090d5ecc7fd86fa908d2e5eda41d16606507a238d9488fa5323405364a9556b670684a2e4838aead2d
b67978529a Add comments to Python ECDSA implementation (John Newbery)
8c7b9324ca Pure python EC (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This removes the dependency on OpenSSL for the interaction tests, by providing a pure-Python
toy implementation of secp256k1.
ACKs for commit b67978:
jnewbery:
utACK b67978529ad02fc2665f2362418dc53db2e25e17
Tree-SHA512: 181445eb08b316c46937b80dc10aa50d103ab1fdddaf834896c0ea22204889f7b13fd33cbcbd00ddba15f7e4686fe0d9f8e8bb4c0ad0e9587490c90be83966dc
3c3e31c3a4 [tests] Add wallet-tool test (João Barbosa)
49d2374acf [tools] Add wallet inspection and modification tool (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Adds an offline tool `bitcoin-wallet-tool` for wallet creation and maintenance.
Currently this tool can create a new wallet file, display information on an existing wallet, and run the salvage and zapwallettxes maintenance tasks on an existing wallet. It can later be extended to support other common wallet maintenance tasks.
Doing wallet maintenance tasks in an offline tool makes much more sense (and is potentially safer) than having to spin up a full node.
Tree-SHA512: 75a28b8a58858d9d76c7532db40eacdefc5714ea5aab536fb1dc9756e2f7d750d69d68d59c50a68e633ce38fb5b8c3e3d4880db30fe01561e07ce58d42bceb2b
* Handle attempts to read non-existent records from isdb properly
* Do not reject blocks that conflict with islocks while still syncing
Otherwise you can stuck with no new blocks/headers which means you won't be able to verify new chainlocks that might override stored islocks
* Handle duplicates/conflicting islocks better
* More constness
