## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Install of dash_hash will change once
https://github.com/dashpay/dash_hash/pull/17/ is merged
## What was done?
- Changed install instructions to match new install in dash_hash README
- Updated Dockerfile to install correctly
## How Has This Been Tested?
N/A
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should fix ci failures like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4261565118 in #5291
## What was done?
Use the exact dash_hash version/tag instead of simply using `master`.
Bumping `DASH_HASH_VERSION` invalidates docker cache.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran it in my gitlab ci
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Slightly changes the detached signature creation code
## What was done?
Investigated what exactly needed to be done for notarization (docs to
come), tried it again, then when it failed as expected trying to figure
it out, then figuring it out :) simple change in the end.
## How Has This Been Tested?
created macOS detached sigs and notarized 19.0.0-rc.10 binaries and
ensured that all worked as expected. See binary attached here (sha256
3829e863831b05c3d76785540183bee556c4bab03dac98f5872df06668b9cb20)
[dashcore-19.0.0-rc.10-osx.dmg.zip](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/files/11246273/dashcore-19.0.0-rc.10-osx.dmg.zip).
You can also do a signed gitian-build for rc.10 and should replicate
these hashes.
## Breaking Changes
Should be none; I would like to backport this to 19 as a 19.0.1
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Automation in private dashevo GitHub was failing due to the branch
trying to be built not having the automation be the newer tagged based
system. as such, if you simply tag a commit from the dashpay repo and
try to build it using automation, the build would fail. This should
resolve the issue. Recommended to BP so that we don't have this issue
when building v19.x branch builds
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Creating a docker image should now be as simple pushing a branch and tag
to dashevo/dash; start the automation on branch develop with tag
previously specified
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Name of some files in gitian's build contains "18" instead 19.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Version bumped in gitian's related configs
## How Has This Been Tested?
Will be tested with next RC of v19
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
@PastaPastaPasta may you update release TODO checklist, please?
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
bfe1ba2f5b36056e0c41edf8206b93d3d83098df rel-builds: Specify core.abbrev for git-rev-parse (Carl Dong)
27e63e01cce368d67092de8f0c736927d6f6aa69 build: Accomodate makensis v2.x (Carl Dong)
1f2c39a30e0f82046c7aecddfda3eb99cb536816 guix: Remove logical cores requirement (Carl Dong)
a4f6ffa71e335d4b2a6bf525b7f416968f9cd9f7 lint: Also enable source statements for non-gitian (Carl Dong)
d256f91cb1b0d6ff5170106b99b0266cbe51f5a2 rel-builds: Directly deploy win installer to OUTDIR (Carl Dong)
fa791da02f9684e3fd554b687fb692ae6a23d65a nsis: Specify OutFile path only once (Carl Dong)
14701604d0904bc5bbf1c67de08f8ee6d3215523 guix: Expose GIT_COMMON_DIR in container as readonly (Carl Dong)
f5a6ac4f48b18f93050d77bcb23f9cf45ec34647 guix: Make source tarball using git-archive (Carl Dong)
395c1137f630dc495ffb2752a23bc1dfd470ee53 gitian: Limit sourced script to just assignments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #18556
Related: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17595#discussion_r399728721
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK bfe1ba2f5b36056e0c41edf8206b93d3d83098df - I agree with Carl, and am going to merge this. I'd like for Linux Guix builds to be working again, and we can rebase #18818.
Tree-SHA512: c87ada7e3de17ca0b692a91029b86573442ded5780fc081c214773f6b374a0cdbeaf6f6898c36669c2e247ee32aa7f82defb1180f8decac52c65f0c140f18674
f2b5b0a3b48f9241971c14238040048f8b630811 build: add linker optimization flags to guix (fanquake)
b8b050a8d642e38c81d1e451750c2c8db92fee5e build: add linker optimization flags to gitian descriptors (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This PR adds `-Wl,O2` to our gitian and guix LDFLAGS. This makes the linker perform certain optimisations (and is different from LTO).
Any -O argument will enable optimizations in GNU ld. We can use -O2 here, as this matches our compile flags. Note that this would also enable additional optimizations if using the lld or gold linkers, when compared to -O0.
A nice writeup + diagrams of some of these optimizations is available here: http://lwn.net/Articles/192624/.
#### master
```bash
# bitcoind
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 3 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 1 ( 33.3%) 0.0%
1 0 ( 0.0%) 0.0%
2 1 ( 33.3%) 40.0%
3 1 ( 33.3%) 100.0%
```
```bash
# bitcoin-qt
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 3 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 0 ( 0.0%) 0.0%
1 1 ( 33.3%) 10.0%
2 0 ( 0.0%) 10.0%
3 0 ( 0.0%) 10.0%
4 1 ( 33.3%) 50.0%
5 1 ( 33.3%) 100.0%
```
#### this PR:
```bash
# bitcoind
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 8 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 3 ( 37.5%) 0.0%
1 5 ( 62.5%) 100.0%
```
```bash
# bitcoin-qt
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 19 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 9 ( 47.4%) 0.0%
1 10 ( 52.6%) 100.0%
```
#### GNU ld -O
> If level is a numeric values greater than zero ld optimizes the output. This might take significantly longer and therefore probably should only be enabled for the final binary. At the moment this option only affects ELF shared library generation. Future releases of the linker may make more use of this option. Also currently there is no difference in the linker’s behaviour for different non-zero values of this option. Again this may change with future releases.
#### lld -O
> Optimize output file size
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK f2b5b0a3b48f9241971c14238040048f8b630811
laanwj:
ACK f2b5b0a3b48f9241971c14238040048f8b630811
Tree-SHA512: e53f3a4338317dbec65d3a93b57b5a6204aabdf9ac82d99447847a3c8627facc53c58c2cf947376f13edd979fc8129a80f18d9ebeccd191a576c83f1dad5c513
a35e3235891d35daa167116cc70340140e883f06 guix: Appease travis. (Carl Dong)
0b66d22da5f53640e22f05adf880782c613e6d0f guix: Use gcc-9 for mingw-w64 instead of 8 (Carl Dong)
ba0b99bdd613ba7f17c6247ece3001e1b44759a3 guix: Don't set MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API CFLAG in depends (Carl Dong)
93439a71eda49fb69f1e82966a23a946733aa6fa guix: Bump to upstream commit with mingw-w64 changes (Carl Dong)
35a96792dda9e78165b1598aeac7b2ab759e7be5 guix: Check mingw symbols, improve SSP fix docs (Carl Dong)
449d8fe25bbe25daacfc67aa89ca32b0a3254c5a guix: Expand on INT trap message (Carl Dong)
3f1f03c67a8e9edf487f08d272adb18b0a3942c8 guix: Spelling fixes (Carl Dong)
ff821dd2a1c600488d11e7d9a20e9179ecc9144b guix: Reinstate make-ssp-fixed-gcc (Carl Dong)
360a9e0ad50a36ec79a1a160dbed3966689fd41c guix: Bump time-machine for mingw-w64 patches (Carl Dong)
93e41b7e3b54c17fd1b4c61ee95fc0dc2827e954 guix: Use gcc-8 for mingw-w64 instead of 7 (Carl Dong)
ef4f7e4c45c60a69406134122f091c77c6ef740f guix: Set the well-known timezone env var (Carl Dong)
acf4b3b3b5accf60a19441a0298ef27001b78e72 guix: Make x86_64-w64-mingw32 builds reproducible (Carl Dong)
c4cce00eac691625b78b92f7dba0b7f57def19e5 guix: Remove dead links from README. (Carl Dong)
df953a4c9a6143f45864757b706c88b6fa70545a guix: Appease shellcheck. (Carl Dong)
91897c95e191d293eb27d8af15cbeafc5b8f3895 guix: Improve guix-build.sh documentation (Carl Dong)
570d769c6c59b9f6d1a2b95b2ed60432cb33b3ba guix: Build support for Windows (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
~~Based on: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16519~~
Based on: #17933 (Time Machines are... shall we say... superior 😁)
This PR allows us to perform Guix builds for the `x86_64-w64-mingw32` target. We do this _without_ splitting up the build script like we do in Gitian by using this newfangled alien technology called `case` statements. (This is WIP and might be changed to `if` statements soon)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a35e3235891d35daa167116cc70340140e883f06 2/3
Tree-SHA512: c471951c23eb2cda919a71285d8b8f2580cb20f09d5db17b53e13dbd8813e01b3e7a83ea848e4913fd0f2bc12c6c133c5f76b54e65c0d89fed4dfd2e0be19875
0ae42a16c766a7ecb8711bfad6f22b8581ea0258 guix: Remove now-unnecessary gcc make flag (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Previously, Guix would produce a gcc which did not know to use the SSP
function from glibc, and required a gcc make flag for it to do so, in my
attempt to fix it upstream I realized that this is no longer the case.
This can be verified by performing a Guix build and doing
readelf -s ... | grep __stack_chk
to check that symbols are coming from glibc, and doing
readelf -d ... | grep NEEDED | grep ssp
to see that libssp.so is not being depended on
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 0ae42a16c766a7ecb8711bfad6f22b8581ea0258 - ran a Guix build (hashes below) and checked all the linux binaries:
Tree-SHA512: 701b91e7c323b12a29af9539cb2656d10ce0a93af573a02e57f0b7fea05a6e1819798536eadb24d0a17e7f35b503f5e863fee5e7409db1b8a3973c4375e49d4e
fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c build: Skip i686 build by default in guix and gitian (MarcoFalke)
fa55a2554c2661b8f2a759044d5ac85c9979d9ca depends: Remove reference to win32 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Closes#17504
Now that we no longer provide downloads for i686 on our website (https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/), there is no need to build them by default.
i686 can still be built in depends (tested by ci/travis) and in guix/gitian by setting the appropriate `HOSTS`.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c -- patch looks correct
dongcarl:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c patch looks correct
laanwj:
Code review ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c
hebasto:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: b000c19a2cd2a596a52028fa298c4022c24cfdfc1bdb3795a90916d0a00a32e4dd22278db93790b6a11724e08ea8451f4f05c77bc40d1664518e11a8c82d6e29
88c83636d5a56bd9551577139786bdd3e74852c2 guix: Update documentation for time-machine (Carl Dong)
e6050884fdabfa6e51e6afce2041d91e60a5adec guix: Pin Guix using `guix time-machine` (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
An alternative to #16519, pinning our version of Guix and eliminating a `guix pull` and changing the default Guix profile of builders.
I think this method might be superior, as it:
- Eliminates the possibility of future changes to the `guix environment` command line interface breaking our builds
- Eliminates the need to set up a separate channel repo
It is a more general pinning solution than #16519.
-----
The reason why I didn't originally propose this is because `guix time-machine` is a recent addition to Guix, only available since `f675f8dec73d02e319e607559ed2316c299ae8c7`
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 88c83636d5a56bd9551577139786bdd3e74852c2
Tree-SHA512: 85e03b0987ffa86da73e02801e1cd8b7622698d70c4ba4e60561611be1e9717d661c2811a59b3e137b1b8eef2d0ba37c313867d035ebc89c3bd06a23a078064a
ac831339cbfa65b1f7576c53b5d9a94841db9868 doc: Fix some misspellings (randymcmillan)
Pull request description:
Here is a more thorough lint-spelling update.
This PR takes care of easy to fix spelling errors to clean up the linting stages.
There are misspellings coded into the functional tests.
That is a whole separate job within itself.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK ac831339cbfa65b1f7576c53b5d9a94841db9868 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: d8fad83fed083715655f148263ddeffc6752c8007d568fcf3dc2c418ccd5db70089ce3ccfd3994fcbd78043171402eb9cca5bdd5125287e22c42ea305aaa6e9d
751549b52a9a4cd27389d807ae67f02bbb39cd7f contrib: guix: Additional clarifications re: substitutes (Carl Dong)
cd3e947f50db7cfe05c05b368c25742193729a62 contrib: guix: Various improvements. (Carl Dong)
8dff3e48a9e03299468ed3b342642f01f70da9db contrib: guix: Clarify SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. (Carl Dong)
3e80ec3ea9691c7c89173de922a113e643fe976b contrib: Add deterministic Guix builds. (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
~~**This post is kept updated as this project progresses. Use this [latest update link](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-497303718) to see what's new.**~~
Please read the `README.md`.
-----
### Guix Introduction
This PR enables building bitcoin in Guix containers. [Guix](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Features.html) is a transactional package manager much like Nix, but unlike Nix, it has more of a focus on [bootstrappability](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Bootstrapping.html) and [reproducibility](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/blog/tags/reproducible-builds/) which are attractive for security-sensitive projects like bitcoin.
### Guix Build Walkthrough
Please read the `README.md`.
[Old instructions no. 4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-497303718)
[Old instructions no. 3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-493827011)
[Old instructions no. 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-471658439)
<details>
<summary>Old instructions no. 1</summary>
In this PR, we define a Guix [manifest](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-package.html#profile_002dmanifest) in `contrib/guix/manifest.scm`, which declares what packages we want in our environment.
We can then invoke
```
guix environment --manifest=contrib/guix/manifest.scm --container --pure --no-grafts --no-substitutes
```
To have Guix:
1. Build an environment containing the packages we defined in our `contrib/guix/manifest.scm` manifest from the Guix bootstrap binaries (see [bootstrappability](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Bootstrapping.html) for more details).
2. Start a container with that environment that has no network access, and no access to the host's filesystem except to the `pwd` that it was started in.
3. Drop you into a shell in that container.
> Note: if you don't want to wait hours for Guix to build the entire world from scratch, you can eliminate the `--no-substitutes` option to have Guix download from available binary sources. Note that this convenience doesn't necessarily compromise your security, as you can check that a package was built correctly after the fact using `guix build --check <packagename>`
Therefore, we can perform a build of bitcoin much like in Gitian by invoking the following:
```
make -C depends -j"$(nproc)" download && \
cat contrib/guix/build.sh | guix environment --manifest=contrib/guix/manifest.scm --container --pure --no-grafts --no-substitutes
```
We don't include `make -C depends -j"$(nproc)" download` inside `contrib/guix/build.sh` because `contrib/guix/build.sh` is run inside the container, which has no network access (which is a good thing).
</details>
### Rationale
I believe that this represents a substantial improvement for the "supply chain security" of bitcoin because:
1. We no longer have to rely on Ubuntu for our build environment for our releases ([oh the horror](72bd4ab867/contrib/gitian-descriptors/gitian-linux.yml (L10))), because Guix builds everything about the container, we can perform this on almost any Linux distro/system.
2. It is now much easier to determine what trusted binaries are in our supply chain, and even make a nice visualization! (see [bootstrappability](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Bootstrapping.html)).
3. There is active effort among Guix folks to minimize the number of trusted binaries even further. OriansJ's [stage0](https://github.com/oriansj/stage0), and janneke's [Mes](https://www.gnu.org/software/mes/) all aim to achieve [reduced binary boostrap](http://joyofsource.com/reduced-binary-seed-bootstrap.html) for Guix. In fact, I believe if OriansJ gets his way, we will end up some day with only a single trusted binary: hex0 (a ~500 byte self-hosting hex assembler).
### Steps to Completion
- [x] Successfully build bitcoin inside the Guix environment
- [x] Make `check-symbols` pass
- [x] Do the above but without nasty hacks
- [x] Solve some of the more innocuous hacks
- [ ] Make it cross-compile (HELP WANTED HERE)
- [x] Linux
- [x] x86_64-linux-gnu
- [x] i686-linux-gnu
- [x] aarch64-linux-gnu
- [x] arm-linux-gnueabihf
- [x] riscv64-linux-gnu
- [ ] OS X
- [ ] x86_64-apple-darwin14
- [ ] Windows
- [ ] x86_64-w64-mingw32
- [ ] Maybe make importer for depends syntax
- [ ] Document build process for future releases
- [ ] Extra: Pin the revision of Guix that we build with with Guix [inferiors](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Inferiors.html)
### Help Wanted
[Old content no. 3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-483318210)
[Old content no. 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-471658439)
<details>
<summary>Old content no. 1</summary>
As of now, the command described above to perform a build of bitcoin a lot like Gitian works, but fails at the `check-symbols` stage. This is because a few dynamic libraries are linked in that shouldn't be.
Here's what `ldd src/bitcoind` looks like when built in a Guix container:
```
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffcc2d90000)
libdl.so.2 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fb7eda09000)
librt.so.1 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007fb7ed9ff000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fb7ed87c000)
libpthread.so.0 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fb7ed85b000)
libm.so.6 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb7ed6da000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fb7ed6bf000)
libc.so.6 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb7ed506000)
/gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb7ee3a0000)
```
And here's what it looks in one of our releases:
```
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffff52cd000)
libpthread.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f87726b4000)
librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007f87726aa000)
libm.so.6 => /usr/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f8772525000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f877250b000)
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8772347000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8773392000)
```
~~I suspect it is because my script does not apply the gitian-input patches [described in the release process](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#fetch-and-create-inputs-first-time-or-when-dependency-versions-change) but there is no description as to how these patches are applied.~~ It might also be something else entirely.
Edit: It is something else. It appears that the gitian inputs are only used by [`gitian-win-signer.yml`](d6e700e40f/contrib/gitian-descriptors/gitian-win-signer.yml (L14))
</details>
### How to Help
1. Install Guix on your distro either [from source](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Requirements.html) or perform a [binary installation](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Binary-Installation.html#Binary-Installation)
2. Try out my branch and the command described above!
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Thanks for the replies. ACK 751549b52a9a4cd27389d807ae67f02bbb39cd7f
laanwj:
ACK 751549b52a9a4cd27389d807ae67f02bbb39cd7f
Tree-SHA512: 50e6ab58c6bda9a67125b6271daf7eff0ca57d0efa8941ed3cd951e5bf78b31552fc5e537b1e1bcf2d3cc918c63adf19d685aa117a0f851024dc67e697890a8d
fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f doc: Use precise permission flags where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of mentioning the all-encompassing `-whitelist*` settings, change the docs to mention the exact permission flag that will influence the behaviour.
This is needed because in the future, the too-broad `-whitelist*` settings (they either include *all* permission flags or apply to *all* peers) might be deprecated to require the permission flags to be enumerated.
Alternatively, in the future there could be an RPC to set the net permission flags on an existing connection, in which case the `-whitelist*` terminology is of no help.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f
fjahr:
Code review ACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f
jonatack:
ACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f
Tree-SHA512: c7dea3e577d90103bb2b0ffab7b7c8640b388932a3a880f69e2b70747fc9213dc1f437085671fd54c902ec2a578458b8a2fae6dbe076642fb88efbf9fa9e679c
* Squashed 'src/dashbls/' content from commit 66ee820fbc
git-subtree-dir: src/dashbls
git-subtree-split: 66ee820fbc9e3b97370db8c164904af48327a124
* build: stop tracking build-system generated relic_conf.h.in
* build: add support for building bls-signatures from local subtree
* build: add exclusions to linting scripts and filters
* build: drop bls-signatures (bls-dash) from depends
e1c582cbaa4c094d204da34c3b1fdd0d4c557519 contrib: makeseeds: Read suspicious hosts from a file instead of hardcoding (Sanjay K)
Pull request description:
referring to: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17020
good first issue: reading SUSPICIOUS_HOSTS from a file.
I haven't changed the base hosts that were included in the original source, just made it readable from a file.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK e1c582cbaa4c094d204da34c3b1fdd0d4c557519 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 18684abc1c02cf52d63f6f6ecd98df01a9574a7c470524c37e152296504e2e3ffbabd6f3208214b62031512aeb809a6d37446af82c9f480ff14ce4c42c98e7c2
2d23082cbe4641175d752a5969f67cdadf1afcea bump test timeouts so that functional tests run in valgrind (Micky Yun Chan)
Pull request description:
ci/tests: Bump timeouts so all functional tests run on travis in valgrind #17763
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 5a8c6e2ea02b715facfcb58c761577be15ae58c45a61654beb98c2c2653361196c2eec521bcae4a9a1bab8e409d6807de771ef4c46d3d05996ae47a22d499d54
c491368d8cfddf3a5b6d574f10ed67492fcecbed scripts: add MACHO dylib checking to symbol-check.py (fanquake)
76bf97213f4b153dd3ccf1314088a73c4804601d scripts: fix check-symbols & check-security argument passing (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Based on #17857.
This adds dynamic library checks for MACHO executables to symbol-check.py. The script has been modified to function more like `security-check.py`. The error output is now also slightly different. i.e:
```bash
# Linux x86
bitcoin-cli: symbol operator new[](unsigned long) from unsupported version GLIBCXX_3.4
bitcoin-cli: export of symbol vtable for std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits<char> > not allowed
bitcoin-cli: NEEDED library libstdc++.so.6 is not allowed
bitcoin-cli: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS EXPORTED_SYMBOLS LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES
# RISCV (skips exported symbols checks)
bitcoin-tx: symbol operator new[](unsigned long) from unsupported version GLIBCXX_3.4
bitcoin-tx: NEEDED library libstdc++.so.6 is not allowed
bitcoin-tx: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES
# macOS
Checking macOS dynamic libraries...
libboost_filesystem.dylib is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!
bitcoind: failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES
```
Compared to `v0.19.0.1` the macOS allowed dylibs has been slimmed down somewhat:
```diff
src/qt/bitcoin-qt:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
-/System/Library/Frameworks/DiskArbitration.framework/Versions/A/DiskArbitration
/System/Library/Frameworks/IOKit.framework/Versions/A/IOKit
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/CoreServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/ApplicationServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation
-/System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Versions/A/Security
-/System/Library/Frameworks/SystemConfiguration.framework/Versions/A/SystemConfiguration
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Versions/A/CoreGraphics
-/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/OpenGL
-/System/Library/Frameworks/AGL.framework/Versions/A/AGL
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Carbon
/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib
-/System/Library/Frameworks/CFNetwork.framework/Versions/A/CFNetwork
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreText.framework/Versions/A/CoreText
/System/Library/Frameworks/ImageIO.framework/Versions/A/ImageIO
/usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c491368d8cfddf3a5b6d574f10ed67492fcecbed
Tree-SHA512: f8624e4964e80b3e0d34e8d3cc33f3107938f3ef7a01c07828f09b902b5ea31a53c50f9be03576e1896ed832cf2c399e03a7943a4f537a1e1c705f3804aed979
4455949d6f0218b40d33d7fe6de6555f8f62192f Make test DoS_mapOrphans deterministic (David Reikher)
Pull request description:
This pull request proposes a solution to make the test `DoS_mapOrphans` in denialofservice_tests.cpp have deterministic coverage.
The `RandomOrphan` function in denialofservice_tests.cpp and the implicitly called function `ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax` in pubkey.cpp were causing the non-deterministic test coverage.
In the former, if a random orphan was selected the index of which is bigger than the max. orphan index in `mapOrphanTransactions`, the last orphan was returned from `RandomOrphan`. If the random number generated was never large enough, this condition would not be fulfilled and the corresponding branch wouldn't run. The proposed solution is to force one of the 50 dependant orphans to depend on the last orphan in `mapOrphanTransactions` using the newly introduced function `OrphanByIndex` (and passing it a large uint256), forcing this branch to run at least once.
In the latter, if values for ECDSA `R` or `S` (or both) had no leading zeros, some code would not be executed. The solution was to find a constant signature that would be comprised of `R` and `S` values with leading zeros and calling `CPubKey::Verify` at the end of the test with this signature forcing this code to always run at least once at the end even if it hadn't throughout the test.
To test that the coverage is (at least highly likely) deterministic, I ran
`contrib/devtools/test_deterministic_coverage.sh denialofservice_tests/DoS_mapOrphans 1000`
and the result was deterministic coverage across 1000 runs.
Also - removed denialofservice_tests test entry from the list of non-deterministic tests in the coverage script.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 4455949d6f0218b40d33d7fe6de6555f8f62192f
Tree-SHA512: 987eb1f94b80d5bec4d4944e91ef43b9b8603055750362d4b4665b7f011be27045808aa9f4c6ccf8ae009b61405f9a1b8671d65a843c3328e5b8acce1f1c00a6
* contrib: set the working directory to /src/dash to allow for cloning gitian dependencies
* contrib: place the home directory inside /home instead of root
* contrib: add notes about sharing ccache across the network
* contrib: chown based on the (u/g)id env vars instead of the associated username
* contrib: reduce layer count by reducing run invocations
* contrib: develop container cleanup and maintenance
- add apt-cacher-ng, gpg, lsb-release, screen as a package dependencies
- reorder packages in alphabetical order
- correct documentation
- create and add user to the docker group to satisfy Gitian's needs
- reduce the number of RUN calls to reduce layer count
683d197970a533690ca1bd4d06d021900e87cb8b Use latest signapple commit (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Update gitian and guix to use the same latest signapple commit.
Also changed guix to use the actual repo. The changes from the fork were incorporated upstream.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 683d197970a533690ca1bd4d06d021900e87cb8b - sanity checked that the updated package is built:
Tree-SHA512: a4981f8bbe33e6c5654632bc9b9f6f2f1e675741a19ac7296205e370f1e64a747101ecb632e0cc82a0134e4c2e9ce47b3f7b4d8c8f75f0f06dd069c078303759
2c403279e2f0f7c8c27c56d4e7b0573c59571f0a gitian: Remove codesign_allocate and pagestuff from MacOS build (Andrew Chow)
f55eed251488d70d5e2e3a2965a4f8ec0c476853 gitian: use signapple to create the MacOS code signature (Andrew Chow)
95b06d21852b28712db6c710e420a58bdc1a0944 gitian: use signapple to apply the MacOS code signature (Andrew Chow)
42bb1ea363286b088257cabccb686ef1887c1d3b gitian: install signapple in gitian-osx-signer.yml (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The MacOS code signing issues that were encountered during the 0.21.0 release cycle have shown that it is necessary for us to use a code signing tool for which the source code is available and modifiable by us. Given that there appears to not be such a tool available, I have written such a tool, [signapple](https://github.com/achow101/signapple), that we can use. This tool is able to create a valid MacOS code signature, detach it in a way that we were doing previously, and attach it to the unsigned binary. This tool can also verify that the signature is correct.
This PR implements the usage of that tool in the gitian build for the code signed MacOS binary. The code signer will use this tool to create the detached signature. Gitian builders will use this tool to apply the detached signature. The `gitian-osx-signer.yml` descriptor has been modified to install this tool so that the `detached-sig-apply.sh` script can use it. Additionally, the `codesign_allocate` and `pagestuff` tools are no longer necessary so they are no longer added to the tarball used in code signing. Lastly, both the `detached-sig-create.sh` and `detached-sig-apply.sh` scripts are made to be significantly less complex and to not do unexpected things such as unpacking an already unpacked tarball.
The detached code signature that signapple creates is almost identical to that which we were previously creating. The only difference is that the cpu architecture name is included in the extension (e.g. we have `bitcoin-qt.x86_64sign` instead of `bitcoin-qt.sign`). This was done in order to support signing universal binaries which we may want to do in the future. However signapple can still apply existing code signatures as it will accept the `.sign` extension. If it is desired, it can be modified to produce signatures with just the `.sign` extension. However I do not think it is necessary to maintain compatibility with the old process.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2c403279e2f0f7c8c27c56d4e7b0573c59571f0a
Tree-SHA512: 2a0e01e9133f8859b9de26e7e8fe1d2610d2cbdee2845e6008b12c083c7e3622cbb2d9b83c50a269e2c3074ab95914a8225d3cd4108017f58b77a62bf10951e0
eacedfb0230978748cbcfb13817fed7e7c756ba7 scripts: add additional type annotations to security-check.py (fanquake)
83d063e9541cc9ea41ea86919eb9435c73efb14e scripts: add run_command to security-check.py (fanquake)
13f606b4f940e5820ff21ea62fc27a5a91774b05 scripts: remove NONFATAL from security-check.py (fanquake)
061acf62a15ad3dbb9f055b7c2569b9832ed623a scripts: no-longer check for 32 bit windows in security-check.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
* Remove 32-bit Windows checks.
* Remove NONFATAL checking. Added in #8249, however unused since #13764.
* Add `run_command` to de-duplicate all of the subprocess calls. Mentioned in #18713.
* Add additional type annotations.
* Print stderr when there is an issue running a command.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK eacedfb0230978748cbcfb13817fed7e7c756ba7
Tree-SHA512: 69a7ccfdf346ee202b3e8f940634c5daed1d2b5a5d15ac9800252866ba3284ec66e391a66a0b341f5a4e5e8482fe1b614d4671e8e766112ff059405081184a85
3e38023af724a76972d39cbccfb0bba4c54a0323 scripts: add PE .reloc section check to security-check.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The `ld` in binutils has historically had a few issues with PE binaries, there's a good summary in this [thread](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011).
One issue in particular was `ld` stripping the `.reloc` section out of PE binaries, even though it's required for functioning ASLR. This was [reported by a Tor developer in 2014](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17321) and they have been patching their [own binutils](https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-build.git/tree/projects/binutils) ever since. However their patch only made it into binutils at the [start of this year](https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=dc9bd8c92af67947db44b3cb428c050259b15cd0). It adds an `--enable-reloc-section` flag, which is turned on by default if you are using `--dynamic-base`. In the mean time this issue has also been worked around by other projects, such as FFmpeg, see [this commit](91b668acd6).
I have checked our recent supported Windows release binaries, and they do contain a `.reloc` section. From what I understand, we are using all the right compile/linker flags, including `-pie` & `-fPIE`, and have never run into the crashing/entrypoint issues that other projects might have seen.
One other thing worth noting here, it how Debian/Ubuntu patch the binutils that they distribute, because that's what we end up using in our gitian builds.
In the binutils-mingw-w64 in Bionic (18.04), which we currently use in gitian, PE hardening options/security flags are enabled by default. See the [changelog](https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/b/binutils-mingw-w64/binutils-mingw-w64_8ubuntu1/changelog) and the [relevant commit](452b3013b8).
However in Focal (20.04), this has now been reversed. PE hardening options are no-longer the default. See the [changelog](https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/b/binutils-mingw-w64/binutils-mingw-w64_8.8/changelog) and [relevant commit](7bd8b2fbc2), which cites same .reloc issue mentioned here.
Given that we explicitly specify/opt-in to everything that we want to use, the defaults aren't necessarily an issue for us. However I think it highlights the importance of continuing to be explicit about what we want, and not falling-back or relying on upstream.
This was also prompted by the possibility of us doing link time garbage collection, see #18579 & #18605. It seemed some sanity checks would be worthwhile in-case the linker goes haywire while garbage collecting.
I think Guix is going to bring great benefits when dealing with these kinds of issues. Carl you might have something to say in that regard.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 3e38023af724a76972d39cbccfb0bba4c54a0323
Tree-SHA512: af14d63bdb334bde548dd7de3e0946556b7e2598d817b56eb4e75b3f56c705c26aa85dd9783134c4b6a7aeb7cb4de567eed996e94d533d31511f57ed332287da
8334ee31f868f0f9baf0920d14d20174ed889dbe scripts: add MACHO LAZY_BINDINGS test to test-security-check.py (fanquake)
7b99c7454cdb74cd9cd7a5eedc2fb9d0a19df456 scripts: add MACHO Canary check to security-check.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
7b99c7454cdb74cd9cd7a5eedc2fb9d0a19df456 uses `otool -Iv` to check for `___stack_chk_fail` in the macOS binaries. Similar to the [ELF check](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/devtools/security-check.py#L105). Note that looking for a triple underscore prefixed function (as opposed to two for ELF) is correct for the macOS binaries. i.e:
```bash
otool -Iv bitcoind | grep chk
0x00000001006715b8 509 ___memcpy_chk
0x00000001006715be 510 ___snprintf_chk
0x00000001006715c4 511 ___sprintf_chk
0x00000001006715ca 512 ___stack_chk_fail
0x00000001006715d6 517 ___vsnprintf_chk
0x0000000100787898 513 ___stack_chk_guard
```
8334ee31f868f0f9baf0920d14d20174ed889dbe is a follow up to #18295 and adds test cases to `test-security-check.py` that for some reason I didn't add at the time. I'll sort out #18434 so that we can run these tests in the CI.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 8334ee31f868f0f9baf0920d14d20174ed889dbe: Mitigations are important. Important things are worth asserting :)
jonasschnelli:
utACK 8334ee31f868f0f9baf0920d14d20174ed889dbe.
Tree-SHA512: 1aa5ded34bbd187eddb112b27278deb328bfc21ac82316b20fab6ad894f223b239a76b53dab0ac1770d194c1760fcc40d4da91ec09959ba4fc8eadedb173936a
