d841301010914203fb5ef02627c76fad99cb11f1 test: Add docstring to wait_until() in util.py to warn about its usage (Seleme Topuz)
1343c86c7cc1fc896696b3ed87c12039e4ef3a0c test: Update wait_until usage in tests not to use the one from utils (Seleme Topuz)
Pull request description:
Replace global (from [test_framework/util.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L228)) `wait_until()` usages with the ones provided by `BitcoinTestFramework` and `P2PInterface` classes.
The motivation behind this change is that the `util.wait_until()` expects a timeout, timeout_factor and lock and it is not aware of the context of the test framework. `BitcoinTestFramework` offers a `wait_until()` which has an understandable amount of default `timeout` and a shared `timeout_factor`. Moreover, on top of these, `mininode.wait_until()` also has a shared lock.
closes#19080
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d841301010914203fb5ef02627c76fad99cb11f1 🦆
kallewoof:
utACK d841301010914203fb5ef02627c76fad99cb11f1
Tree-SHA512: 81604f4cfa87fed98071a80e4afe940b3897fe65cf680a69619a93e97d45f25b313c12227de7040e19517fa9c003291b232f1b40b2567aba0148f22c23c47a88
dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase.
The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used.
Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
instagibbs:
manual inspection ACK dac7a111bd
practicalswift:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :)
Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`feature_pruning.py` is failing atm
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `feature_pruning.py` locally
gitian for this branch with `INTEGRATION_TESTS_ARGS` set to `--extended
--exclude feature_dbcrash --timeoutscale=4 --jobs=4`:
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/pipelines/852044104
NOTE:
[`linux64_tsan-test`](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4197383660)
failed because tsan build binaries are super slow and we hit 30 minutes
timeout for 1 single test because of that. This is not an actual test
failure.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
e2ff385e138562fb3e1cc63bdd58715a2d8bad98 test: check for invalid `-prune` parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR adds missing test coverage for invalid `-prune` parameter values / combinations:
77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L926-L928)77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L935-L937)77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L844-L849)
Not sure if the tests fit into `feature_config_args.py` or should rather be moved into `feature_pruning.py`; the latter though seems to be run less often due to being very memory-hungry.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e2ff385e138562fb3e1cc63bdd58715a2d8bad98
Tree-SHA512: bb0db98090058ecac9f8a01301634e9dba9a65fd56b6a0b770f88da28c4f01e240e22b1225f0d231e28bdd4b5b51bff0e6853cccc46ed0190e91b84f7954a9db
0754e9c01bd3d57aa241e313ba34c18c4897ba98 test: run feature_pruning.py without wallet compiled (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Only one small part of the pruning test (sub-test `wallet_test`) is wallet-related, hence we can run all other parts without wallet compiled.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 0754e9c01bd3d57aa241e313ba34c18c4897ba98
Tree-SHA512: 856856903d21d64953ed0102cc2a96f55975c4b7d8e93e57b82c266024967160df64df2b6068be089efc05e883e8d6d12e7327053420d4c640b9d8cc5bcb1c58
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] ~~I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas~~ N/A
- [ ] ~~I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests~~ N/A
- [ ] ~~I have made corresponding changes to the documentation~~ N/A
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
20b6e959449d0c07639599b99ba917d2cac62493 test: refactor functional tests to use restart_node (Christopher Coverdale)
Pull request description:
fixes#19345
This PR replaces consecutive calls to `stop_node()` and `start_node()` with `restart_node()` where appropriate in the functional tests.
The commit messages are repetitive but focused on each file changed with the intention of squashing if applicable.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 20b6e959449d0c07639599b99ba917d2cac62493
Tree-SHA512: 1cfa1fb8c5f01a7b00fe44e80dbef072147f21e3891098817acd4275b0c5d91dc1c787594209e117edd418f2fa3a7b2dfcbafdf87efc07f740040938d641f3a9
3fd7e76f6d [tests] Move deterministic address import to setup_nodes (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This requires a small changes to a few tests, but means that
deterministic addresses will always be imported (unless setup_nodes
behaviour is explicitly overridden).
Tidies up the way we import deterministic addresses, requested in review comment here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14468#discussion_r225594586.
Tree-SHA512: 2b32edf500e286c463398487ab1153116a1dc90f64a53614716373311abdc83d8a251fdd8f42d1146b56e308664deaf62952113f66e98bc37f23968096d1a961
140a49ce5e547a1b520a7cd063af8308184e7cbf test: check that pruneblockchain RPC fails for future block or timestamp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `pruneblockchain` RPC for the case that a future block or timestamp is passed:
8c0bd871fc/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp (L1101)8c0bd871fc/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp (L1111)
Note that the test method `manual_test` gets called twice, once each with `use_timestamp` set to True/False, respectively. Depending on that, the helper function `height` either converts the passed block height to the timestamp of that block, or just returns it without modification.
The other tests for failures in this RPC are also changed to be more detailled ("Cannot prune blocks because node is not in prune mode", "Negative block height"), as I don't think there is any value in just checking a sub-string. If there is ever an error with the same sub-string is introduced, it's not clear which error is exactly checked with the test, so it makes sense to be as specific as possible.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
tACK 140a49ce5e547a1b520a7cd063af8308184e7cbf
Tree-SHA512: bee3cee9f35c2a63a1839d7ec1f83e354d9d3c0c2ca32d300dca2de8b755d555f769ba2b80ac37d31df6ee7e2b8eaefb8134c4727a7144e47c0f5e34f2cc5822
f402012cc fixup: Fix prunning test (João Barbosa)
97f517dd8 Fix RPC/pruneblockchain returned prune height (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The help of `pruneblockchain` tells us that the return value is `Height of the last block pruned.`,... but the implementation naively returns the provided input `height` and therefore not respecting that pruning can't be done on all possible blockheight due to the fact that we only prune complete blockfiles (which combine multiple blocks).
This fixes the return value to actually return the correct prune height.
ACKs for commit f40201:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f402012ccfc596d7d94851dabbf386c278ff5335
Tree-SHA512: 88c910030ffb83196663e5ebebc29d036fcdbbb2ab266e4538991867924a61bacd8361c1fbf294a0ea7e02347ae183d792f10a10b8f6187e8a4c4c6e4124d7e6
fa566b2601ee5a40bf814e529d7db253dacd28e7 test: Add missing sync_blocks to feature_pruning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16537Fixes#16520
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK fa566b2601ee5a40bf814e529d7db253dacd28e7.
jonatack:
ACK fa566b2601ee5a40bf814e529d7db253dacd28e7. These past few months I have been seeing intermittent failures with this test on master. Ran `(for i in {1..40}; do test/functional/feature_pruning.py -l=debug; done)` overnight with this change; no failures.
Tree-SHA512: 5181d5ea525f43ad09e1c8b9ae72e32219f483948854c6dc07dda24b790cbdf4012e586253a0e158a71a980d1ca9f5fdf06aafbe95b8ea3d9154ef2c8687395b
03d6d23810 [tests] make pruning test faster (John Newbery)
1c29ac40fb [tests] style fixes in feature_pruning.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This commit makes the pruning.py much faster.
Key insights to do this:
- pruning.py doesn't care what kind of transactions make up the big
blocks that are pruned in the test. Instead of making blocks with
several large, expensive to construct and validate transactions,
instead make the large blocks contain a single coinbase transaction with
a huge OP_RETURN txout.
- avoid stop-starting nodes where possible.
ACKs for commit 03d6d2:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 03d6d238104d228acfae9f3e122879bddef8d27d
Tree-SHA512: 511642ce0fa294319dce3486fe06d75970d8ab66deda7f692be081d3056b4ce5b4cf91a7b5762eefbba224ba6c848750016454ff1e5d564acc507b1c41213628
fac95398366f644911b58f1605e6bc37fb76782d qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled (MarcoFalke)
faa669cbcd1fc799517b523b0f850e01b11bf40a qa: Premine to deterministic address with -disablewallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the test_runner would exit if the wallet was not compiled into the Bitcoin Core executable. However, a lot of the tests run without the wallet just fine and there is no need to globally require the wallet to run the tests.
Tree-SHA512: 63177260aa29126fd20f0be217a82b10b62288ab846f96f1cbcc3bd2c52702437703475d91eae3f8d821a3149fc62b725a4c5b2a7b3657b67ffcbc81532a03bb
6f6514a08090b37b5e8c086015ee4881813ef867 Correct units for "-dbcache" and "-prune" (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Actually, all `dbcache`-related values in the code are measured in MiB (not in megabytes, MB) or in bytes (e.g., `nTotalCache`).
See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/txdb.hba8c8b2227/src/init.cpp (L1405-L1424)
Also, "-prune" is fixed:
1. The GUI values in GB are translated to the node values in MiB correctly.
2. The maximum of the "prune" `QSpinBox` is not limited by default value of 99 (GB).
Fix: #15106
Tree-SHA512: 151ec43b31b1074db8b345fedb1dcc10bde225899a5296bfc183f57e1553d13ac27db8db100226646769ad03c9fcab29d88763065a471757c6c41ac51108459d
4999992c34 whitespace: Split ~300 char line into multiple ones (MarcoFalke)
fa71b38168 scripted-diff: Rename rpc_timewait to rpc_timeout (MarcoFalke)
fa3e5786d0 scripted-diff: Remove unused 'split' parameter to setup_network (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is a bugfix, since wallet_dump currently uses the wrong name:
18857b4c40/test/functional/wallet_dump.py (L89-L92)
Rename all to the same name with a scripted diff (and some unrelated cleanups).
Tree-SHA512: 338ddd20dae12e6cf7aa7adbcfb239cf648017a1572b373f8431fecb184bd2a65492846d81e75a023864d9e41c94afb53044c16b79651a5937d34a5a6b772f81
fa0815c300 rpc: Correctly name arguments (Jon Layton)
Pull request description:
Consistently use the same name to describe arguments in the documentation and add a test that uses the name.
By splitting it up, the changes are easier to potentially backport and also make review easier when we switch to `RPCHelpMan`.
The tests should pass with or without the changes in `src`.
Partly stolen from #14459 (More RPC help description fixes by ch4ot1c)
Tree-SHA512: 1072992b1e93ac41006613523e54a0a8004f529fcb101eb9d74d91474abb0945a5a7539f249905151b904b87448f9efc0cacbd9e052fbe2ea9111e62f3e7249c
fa3e874d69 test: pruning: Check that verifychain can be called when pruned (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Tree-SHA512: b921e550fdad27b791665883ed9fc50210575b0f968840a45284ad0e060ddd443ea7b9b12c17916f68ad28877c58ac51a6acc76ae4ea71bf7bfb2f744b286884
68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports.
Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools.
An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports.
Before this commit:
```
$ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
$
```
After this commit:
```
$ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
$
```
Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
fa5b440971a0dfdd64c1b86748a573fcd7dc65d3 qa: Extract rpc_timewait as test param (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also increase it for wallet_dump and wallet_groups
Tree-SHA512: 7367bc584228bda3010c453713a1505c54a8ef3d116be47dab9934d30594089dfeb27ffa862f7517fd0ec8b5dc07f4904d67ef2a53dd284cbe2a58982e410e2b
beee49b [tests] Allow stderr to be tested against specified string (John Newbery)
e503671 [Tests] Use LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1 in tests (John Newbery)
c22ce8a [Tests] Write stdout/stderr to datadir instead of temp file. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
**Due to a merge conflict, this is now based on #10267. Please review that PR first!**
Subset of #12379 now that parts of that PR have been merged.
#12362 was only observed when running the functional tests locally because:
- by defatul libc logs to `/dev/tty` instead of stderr
- the functional tests only check for substring inclusion in stderr when we're expecting bitcoind to fail.
This PR tightens our checking of stderr and will cause tests to fail if there is any unexpected message in stderr:
- commit *Write stdout/stderr to datadir instead of temp file* writes stderr to a file in the datadir instead of a temporary file. This helps with debugging in the case of failure.
- commit *Use LIBC_FATAL_STDERR=1 in tests* ensures that libc failures are logged to stderr instead of the terminal.
commit *Assert that bitcoind stdout is empty on shutdown* asserts that stderr is empty on bitcoind shutdown.
Tree-SHA512: 21111030e667b3b686f2a7625c2b625ebcfb6998e1cccb4f3932e8b5d21fb514b19a73ac971595d049343430e9a63155986a7f5648cad55b8f36f3c58b1c7048
* Merge #16509: test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest"
faf36838bdba7393960fce6ad0c56dc1f93f5870 test: Avoid hardcoding the chain name in combine_logs (MarcoFalke)
fa8a1d7ba30040f8c74f93fc41a61276c255a6a6 test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest" (MarcoFalke)
68f546635d5de2ccfedadeabc7bc79e12e5eca6a test: Fix “local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used” (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This is required for various work in progress:
* testchains #8994
* signet #16411
* some of my locally written tests
While it will be unused in the master branch as of now, it will make all of those pull requests shorter. Thus review for non-regtest tests can focus on the actual changes and not some test framework changes.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faf36838bdba7393960fce6ad0c56dc1f93f5870, ran tests and reviewed the code.
Tree-SHA512: 35add66c12cab68f2fac8f7c7d47c604d3f24eae9336ff78f83e2c92b3dc08a25e7f4217199bac5393dd3fb72f945bba9c001d6fbb8efd298c88858075fcb3d6
* Add devnet support for tests
* test: make sure devnet can connect to each other and start
* Partial merge bitcoin/bitcoin#16681: Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests, revert one TODO while at it
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
c8330d4 qa: Use node.datadir instead of tmpdir in test framework (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Commit c53c9831ee introduced the utility function `get_datadir_path`, however not all places in the code use this util function. Using the util function everywhere makes it easier to review pull requests related to the datadir.
This commit replaces datadir path creation with the `datadir` member of `TestNode`, which itself uses `get_datadir_path`.
Tree-SHA512: c75707ab7149d732a6d56152a5813138a33459d3d07577b60b89f2a207c83b7663fac5f203593677c9892d1c23a5eba4bd45c5c4ababf040d720b437240fcddf
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention
5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.
Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80
* update violation count
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests
6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:
tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
tests for mining features are named mining_...
tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...
Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.
Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16
* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: Fix excluded test names
* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
