fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c chainparams: Bump assumed chain params (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
As every year, reviewers get extra point when their node is running:
* `assumevalid=0`
* `checkpoints=0`
* on non-x86_64 hardware
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#before-every-major-and-minor-release for the process.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c
Sjors:
ACK fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c for mainnet on macOS 10.14.6.
jamesob:
ACK fa3a733116
fanquake:
ACK fa3a7331160d1a460b1c15fca1810e98070d629c - checked the mainnet values. I have notes on reviewing `assumevalid` updates in [core-review](https://github.com/fanquake/core-review/blob/master/update-assumevalid.md).
Tree-SHA512: fc545ba0a7056908040b47076b393d028c1c022967c25a2074752f76f0386ef099a64445da6125117a04418bd7eb0655121bfc94e6f60b7bc2666947491b5228
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Client version string is inconsistent. Building `v20.0.0-beta.8` tag
locally produces binaries that report `v20.0.0-beta.8` version but
binaries built in guix would report
`v20.0.0rc1-g3e732a952226a20505f907e4fd9b3fdbb14ea5ee` instead. Building
any commit after `v20.0.0-beta.8` locally would result in versions like
`v20.0.0rc1-8c94153d2497` which is close but it's still yet another
format. And both versions with `rc1` in their names are confusing cause
you'd expect them to mention `beta.8` instead maybe (or is it just me?
:D ).
## What was done?
Change it so that the version string would look like this:
on tag: ~`v20.0.0-beta.8-dev` or `v20.0.0-beta.8-gitarc`~
`v20.0.0-beta.8`
post-tag: ~`v20.0.0-beta.8-1-gb837e08164-gitarc`~
`v20.0.0-beta.8-1-gb837e08164`
post-tag format is
`recent tag`-`commits since that tag`-`g+12 chars of commit hash`-`dirty
(optional)` ~-`dev or gitarc`~
~`dev`/`gitarc` suffixes should help avoiding confusion with the release
versions and they also indicate the way non-release binaries were
built.~
Note that release binaries do not use any of this, they still use
`PACKAGE_VERSION` from `configure` like before.
Also, `CLIENT_VERSION_RC` is no longer used in this setup so it was
removed.
Few things aren't clear to me yet:
1. Version bump in `configure.ac` no longer affects the reported version
(unless it's an actual release). Are there any downsides I might be
missing?
2. Which tag should we use on `develop` once we bump version in
configure? `v21.0.0-init`? `v21.0.0-alpha1`?
3. How is it going to behave once `merge master back into develop` kind
of PR is merged? E.g. say `develop` branch is on `v21.0.0-alpha1` tag
and we merge v20.1.0 from `master` back into it. Will this bring
`v20.1.0` release tag into `develop`? Will it become the one that will
be used from that moment? If so we will probably need another tag on
`develop` every time such PR is merged e.g. `v21.0.0-alpha2` (or
whatever the next number is).
Don't think these are blockers but would like to hear thoughts from
others.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Built binaries locally, built them using guix at a specific tag and at
some commit on top of it.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Our [Release Process document](doc/release-process.md) is not exactly
matched with our [template
issue](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5694) that created by
copy-paste from previous release.
For the next release just copy test from this document to new issue
## What was done?
[Release Process document](doc/release-process.md) is updated to match
with our real release process.
This document has also detailed instructions for many steps (in compare
to the issue that we use now which is more checklist) to make releasing
process easier for all participant.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested on air by 2 last released: v19, v20:
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5694
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Docs was slightly incorrect after moving to guix
## What was done?
fixed docs
## How Has This Been Tested?
Did notarization :)
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Missing docs
## What was done?
Added docs
## How Has This Been Tested?
In release of v19.1
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
64645fa3e045ec30a57dbd416fcf66d4755f37c6 Release process: fix broken link to Guix building docs (Jeremy Rand)
Pull request description:
Not 100% sure whether this link was always broken or if the Guix docs renamed the heading at some point. Either way, seems good to fix it.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 64645fa3e045ec30a57dbd416fcf66d4755f37c6
Tree-SHA512: 4932059fe583c0d27c70febf8f4dd8cffd3e15567359c5429d2691e221afc6da319bf43ebcd264ae0f98302e1eeb67ffd763d3d7d06ab1633913555ee7461643
132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f doc: Mention the flat directory structure for uploads (Andrew Chow)
fb17c99e35e72f3b21ec3b5473e84c21dc964776 guix: Don't include directory name in SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The SHA256SUMS file can be used in a sha256sum -c command to verify downloaded binaries. However users are likely to download just a single file and not place this file in the correct directory relative to the SHA256SUMS file for the simple verification command to work. By not including the directory name in the SHA256SUMS file, it will be easier for users to verify downloaded binaries.
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f
fanquake:
ACK 132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f
Tree-SHA512: c9ff416b8dfb2f3ceaf4d63afb84aac9fcaefbbf9092f9e095061b472884ec92c7a809e6530c7132a82cfe3ab115a7328e47994a412072e1d4feb26fc502c8c5
90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a release: Release with separate SHA256SUMS and sig files (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This allows us to:
- remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks, and
- release with a SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a
Tree-SHA512: 5d5086063d303aa0cbd590e5fdf2ae8f555e25f4e43bf67545e33384449b990e94834c711622530ad0eb3dcc83f52746884a5081dadb0acff8dd799cfadafac7
fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong)
5d24cc3d82dad6812f8370c3ccc7c2b5a6c12c11 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong)
5da2ee49d5b44de803b671aedbdd14e5c1d71ea9 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong)
318c60700b7bbb7ec09a29bf037e7c2787646be6 guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong)
fcab35b2292f9221eaba521740e8b3b2511a8b78 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong)
c2541fd0ca99481a5a792a8f2772925d64fb0491 guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong)
46ce6ce3782dfbd8f9d26dc2ba0f284755e75f2d tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong)
fc4f8449f34e32b0b9ac9d218d6c3264b02467ba guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong)
263220a85c1df218431fafbda07c8b23ccc4ce4d guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #21462
Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier.
Current TODOs:
- [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up
- [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login
- [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section
- [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section
- [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made
- [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now
- [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source
- [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key
- [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work.
Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release.
Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
eb4c43e49f625895670866b89bb56ca641c4eeb7 doc: documents how to calculate m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_chain_state_size on the release process. (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
Regarding [this](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15183#issuecomment-463133734) on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15183.
Added an "Additional information" section for this which seems reasonable to me but may not be the best place for this. Also, let me know if anything else should be documented here (like more details).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK eb4c43e49f625895670866b89bb56ca641c4eeb7
Tree-SHA512: 7e6fc46740daa01dd9be5a8da7846e7a9f7fa866bf31fdc2cb252f90c698cfd6ef954f9588f7abcebda2355ec2b2a380635e14a164e53e77d38abefa3e2cc698
fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c build: Skip i686 build by default in guix and gitian (MarcoFalke)
fa55a2554c2661b8f2a759044d5ac85c9979d9ca depends: Remove reference to win32 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Closes#17504
Now that we no longer provide downloads for i686 on our website (https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/), there is no need to build them by default.
i686 can still be built in depends (tested by ci/travis) and in guix/gitian by setting the appropriate `HOSTS`.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c -- patch looks correct
dongcarl:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c patch looks correct
laanwj:
Code review ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c
hebasto:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: b000c19a2cd2a596a52028fa298c4022c24cfdfc1bdb3795a90916d0a00a32e4dd22278db93790b6a11724e08ea8451f4f05c77bc40d1664518e11a8c82d6e29
6f7f141f77 Add riscv64 to outputs list in release-process.md (JeremyRand)
Pull request description:
The `riscv64` binary is created by the Gitian scripts and distributed by the Bitcoin Core website, so it should be listed in the release process docs.
I placed it between i686 and x86_64 since it looked like the original list of Linux arches was in alphabetical order; I'm open to including it in a different position if the desire is to keep the two ARM arches together and the two x86 arches together.
ACKs for commit 6f7f14:
fanquake:
utACK 6f7f141f77
Tree-SHA512: e87723f7bddd02e33897cfacdaac9f2e3ccc2bde74eb47d52ba1dd6082c868232e58247e427d6f95dc0b54858d8ccd1b6de47a379fce0f90b63a38bd97ebf419
fa193dc8e6f3b96fa2dba2f1c1668f7720fed320 doc: Remove win32 from the release process (MarcoFalke)
faf666f8148eeb305a9c4f78459aff2c7268016b Remove Windows 32 bit build (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The Windows 32 bit build has been removed from https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, so unless there are complaints, we don't need to build it even
ACKs for commit fa193d:
fanquake:
utACK fa193dc8e6
Tree-SHA512: d6f2976a2e0c407698f720b00ac23ec4056626de4eff8621f4c5581120af0460afd1bdef72329cc0e7d92afca48d94ae5fce6777cb36bfabb60b8034ff08fd88
9d0e52834 implements different disk sizes for different networks on intro (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13213.
Mostly, I layed out the concept to open the PR for refinement and getting feedback if the approach is okay. Changes are expected.
Two points:
- The values for both new consts `TESTNET_BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE` and `TESTNET_CHAIN_STATE_SIZE` is certainly not optimal; I just checked the size of my testnet3 related dirs and set them to little bit higher values. Which values should be used?
- Should we do something like this to regtest? Or these "niceties" do not matter when on regtest?
Thanks!
Tree-SHA512: 8ae87a29fa8356b899e7a823c76cde793d9126b4ee59554d7a2a8edb088fe42a19976b34c06c2fd4a98a727e1e4971dd983f42b6093ea6caa255b45004e22bb4
f24ed6d39f963e7f1c0b4dbd9b784132ef975f2a Delete README_osx.md and move its contents into build-osx.md (Martin Erlandsson)
Pull request description:
With its current name, the file `doc/README_osx.md` looks like an entry point README for OSX users, but it only contains specific instructions on how to build a DMG.
This PR deletes the file and moves the contents of the file into `doc/build-osx.md`.
Tree-SHA512: 2636b9da967f2a4c0d68cb9a157fb3db137bdb8fbff5d9d004f28b5d816e9c27fddc5c403e6b0c363d1dc9ddc7cac8b295efa01fc691126c0e36e21bb9b3cbd3
75a4bf699fa6bdefa1b3d8cd405ea822d6ee01c0 Update release-process.md to include RC version bumping (Andrew Chow)
04b0bc7425e43de90856beeb1f33653db109fecd build: include rc number in version number (Andrew Chow)
895e6bbb2241e9175463734f3677398a9f38f0f8 build: if VERSION_BUILD is non-zero, include it in the package version (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
As noted on IRC, the filenames of the gitian build results do not contain the 4th digit of the version number if it has one, e.g. 0.17.0.1 produces files with the number 0.17.0. Furthermore, when RC's are built, the resulting filenames are of the release version and do not include `rc` in them. This occurs because `configure.ac` is written to create version numbers of the form `major.minor.rev` instead of `major.minor.rev.build` and without any rc version as it does not handle rc numbers.
This PR changes `configure.ac` to include the build number if it is greater than 0. It will also include the rc number if it is greater than 0. So the filenames of the gitian builds will now contain the full version number.
This behavior can be tested by setting `_CLIENT_VERSION_BUILD` and `_CLIENT_VERSION_RC` to non-zero values and then doing `make dist`. A tar file should be created with the correct versioning.
Tree-SHA512: b77990485f2c7770be897dc136737cd805306afff9882ebef7170741f363203587356ccf8bec83163268ace1bd77433fbd2ba8c213f993677bfb867d99a0bbe7
4928a995e9799c6c7ea84fa1efc4fef5b2ff7683 [doc] fix git add argument (Michael Polzer)
Pull request description:
[`A`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-add#Documentation/git-add.txt--A) is the correct flag.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 4928a995e9799c6c7ea84fa1efc4fef5b2ff7683 - checked that [`A`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-add#Documentation/git-add.txt--A) and not `a` is the correct flag.
Tree-SHA512: 7e656ca9688b04ad2ef577aa1847799a34a377f5e6dfe4fd052a95d3dd98798dc10957e7f54164900ac1271f05e788ec4861026f53b910e369b0845532387cf4
989c8990bb765eef45c8ee471f084ca81a0bead4 Rename “OS X” to the newer “macOS” convention (Giulio Lombardo)
Pull request description:
Since 2016, with [macOS 10.12 Sierra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Sierra), Mac OS X has been renamed in macOS. It would be a nice if Bitcoin's macOS build instructions follow this naming convention to avoid misunderstandings.
Tree-SHA512: 51b7d54bfc39a1a9d0773c64780817c7beca7094aded80481086287474dfa272bf0a1dfa6ef6e3cae91548aa127f65fa730003dddcb97147cdc8c249146aea22
95464c7519 doc: Improve command to generate list of authors for release notes (Mitchell Cash)
1c22cc1af1 doc: Update broken links to now point to gitian-build.py (Mitchell Cash)
Pull request description:
- Update broken links
- Improve command to generate list of authors for a release
---
I also note that it asks to ping **wumpus** on IRC, to assist in generating a list of merged pulls and sort them into categories based on labels. I tried to turn this into a simple one-liner as well (something like ``git log --merges --format="- \`%h\` %s (%an)" v0.16.0..v0.16.1``), but it didn't seem to capture everything I needed.
Would it be worthwhile **wumpus** open-sourcing his code into `contrib/devtools` so there is no single point of failure (even if it can manually be worked around).
Tree-SHA512: 8e7f0880ff07ce8fe67b74de3f2c4b78dafe2c95eefb0617fa319ff196232967cb22ee75a183a39f93bfc6e0bf85547689160139312cee5956af2c069b8a3b6a
08e0855b9 Give hint about gitian not able to download (kallewoof)
Pull request description:
Gitian fails to perform downloads right now on my set up. This can be circumvented by first checking out the tag being built and then doing the depends download step before running `gbuild`.
This should of course be fixed in gitian, but having this note until it's fixed is definitely useful.
Tree-SHA512: ae9d0eb44ecfdae44d35aecc6e5fd6db7d9e95b8e0badc76a1d9aaf8fe70bc00a2914dfcb4f516d030560835af411515ca13736ebf8b49b7040b340457882779
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
e2b2e48b6 doc: SIGNER can contains space inside now. (Ken Lee)
Pull request description:
SIGNER can contains space inside now. mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12527#issuecomment-370506416
Tree-SHA512: 8da1e8146751457c351058c0142fa3d474a338fe7304a31ebed4726202202724aaca94441806458512259238a703601b87961196abc3fdd57b5eb0f062ff0c12
7444149 Document method for reviewers to verify chainTxData (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This commit adds the final block hash of the window to getchaintxstats
and documents how reviewers can verify changes to chainTxData.
Tree-SHA512: d16abb5f47d058e52660f4d495f1e453205b1b83716d7c810ff62a70338db721386c1808ec1fc8468f514e4d80cc58e3c96eeb3184cbbcb1d07830fa5e53f342
7f968ae107 doc: Explain how to update chainTxData in release process (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Adds a short explanation how to update chainTxData to the release process. Mention where to get the data, and link to an example.
Tree-SHA512: 66b0eb12a25afb7b1da0788c8f9f9701d566cb7ce55899402440a57bef0e177b55e926442d3c8aa482299abe7c48ab94735d501c37f0a11fefb86e2fc2e33d9b
* build: use osslsigncode 2.0 in gitian
The original osslsigncode project (https://sourceforge.net/projects/osslsigncode/) has been marked as abandonware,
"This is now - and has been for a long while - abandonware. Feel free to create your own forks etc.".
However, a fork at https://github.com/mtrojnar/osslsigncode has emerged that has incorporated
theuni's patches, updated the tool to work with OpenSSL 1.1 and made other improvements.
This commit switches the windows signer descriptor to use this new version of osslsigncode.
* Fixed wget call in gitian-build.py
Co-authored-by: Michael <fanquake@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: willyk <k.o.willy@gmail.com>
e93ff71 Add instructions for multi-processor gitian builds (Charlie Lee)
Pull request description:
This makes builds much faster if you have a multi-core machine.
Tree-SHA512: edb64c691a31a8a2e6c45f87886912d429a3fd600ebc0de2b16d44efd9d38bb92fea33c5fed207ad684b75d3247218912cab67661466a5538d534845e0808c9f
9ff7818 doc: Update release process for simplified version bumping (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
08d9aee build: Remove duplicate version information from src/clientversion.h (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
168a703 doc: Make build system insert version in Doxyfile (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
b67eb8d doc: Remove version numbers from READMEs (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Tree-SHA512: 531e44282b1c1383a382847a5605177917dfbf78acfaa754d1cbadd2e165c7e34ddbd01790f87615083fac359571708c2551ad24b712aab1f84a2068360c3a17
41b8821 Add updating of chainTxData to release process (Pieter Wuille)
Tree-SHA512: f7d6e72b19aa83fc4851a9316d6c6a236e0e914d637525cda42c0b15a94543b8072ce67b57d6b12141332a03b64b6c715dff4d61e6e58e0197b22305b35ad65d
09fe2d9 release: update docs to show basic codesigning procedure (Cory Fields)
f642753 release: create a bundle for the new signing script (Cory Fields)
0068361 release: add win detached sig creator and our cert chain (Cory Fields)
Tree-SHA512: 032ad84697c70faaf857b9187f548282722cffca95d658e36413dc048ff02d9183253373254ffcc1158afb71140753f35abfc9fc8781ea5329c04d13c98759c0
* Doc: fix broken formatting in markdown #headers
Insert a space in markdown headers between the #'s and the header text.
(It appears that the space is required since a github update a year ago
https://github.com/blog/2100-github-pages-now-faster-and-simpler-with-jekyll-3-0)
* Update REST-interface.md
* Update guide-startmany.md
* Update instantsend.md
* Update keepass.md
* Update release-process.md
