Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wladimir J. van der Laan
5d6e2565e6 Merge #15057: [rpc] Correct reconsiderblock help text, add test
fa38d3df69851212fea7544badadc1c3e5369bf5 [rpc] Correct reconsiderblock help text, add test (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Rework documentation and test to match the implementation

Tree-SHA512: d0adef6b054a341bcc1cb87783a4e4cf9be124ba6812e1ac88246a5e01b2861a8071b12dba880b2b428c37da3fa860bfec3fe3e5fbb7c28696872113faa84a9f
2022-03-08 22:53:13 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
bff9273316
Merge #16737: test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock
fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71 test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Headers and block sync should eventually converge to the same result, regardless of whether the peers treat each other as "inbound" or "outbound".

  `connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.

  Thus remove the `connect_nodes_bi` workaround from the rpc_invalidateblock test.

  Conveniently, this also closes #16453. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16444#issuecomment-514801708 for rationale

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71

Tree-SHA512: b3614c66a205823df73f64d19cacfbec269beb5db52ff79004d746e17d7c0dfb43ab9785fdddc97e2a76fe76286c8c605b34df3dda4a2bf5be035f01169ae89a
2021-12-15 20:09:57 +05:30
MarcoFalke
0bb0d89cb3 Merge #14236: qa: generate --> generatetoaddress change to allow tests run without wallet
0ca4c8b3c6 Changed functional tests which do not require wallets to run without (sanket1729)

Pull request description:

  Addresses #14216 . Changed Changed `get_deterministic_priv_key()` to return named tuple`(address, key)`
  I have tried to be exhaustive as possible in maximum coverage for non-wallet mode without affecting any coverage for wallet mode.

  However, I could not check the tests in wallet mode because of timeout issues. Hopefully, travis job checks those.

  Tests `feature_block.py`, `feature_logging.py` and `feature_reindex.py` were skipping despite having no direct dependency on any wallet functions. So, I have also disabled the `skip_test_no_wallet()` for those files too.

Tree-SHA512: 8f84bd8400a732d4266c7518d5cbcf1eb761f623a64a74849e0470142c8ef22cb75364474ddae75d9213c3d16659a52917b5ed979a313695da6abd16c4fd7445
2021-09-21 17:27:11 -04:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
71b4cf307b Merge #14180: qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled
fac95398366f644911b58f1605e6bc37fb76782d qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled (MarcoFalke)
faa669cbcd1fc799517b523b0f850e01b11bf40a qa: Premine to deterministic address with -disablewallet (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Currently the test_runner would exit if the wallet was not compiled into the Bitcoin Core executable. However, a lot of the tests run without the wallet just fine and there is no need to globally require the wallet to run the tests.

Tree-SHA512: 63177260aa29126fd20f0be217a82b10b62288ab846f96f1cbcc3bd2c52702437703475d91eae3f8d821a3149fc62b725a4c5b2a7b3657b67ffcbc81532a03bb
2021-09-21 17:24:56 -04:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
0b13db2ac5 merge #14954: Require python 3.5 2021-08-31 11:16:12 +05:30
MarcoFalke
9f4f52ae4e
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports.
68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports.

  Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools.

  An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports.

  Before this commit:

  ```
  $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  $
  ```

  After this commit:

  ```
  $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
  $
  ```

Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2021-07-06 20:29:33 +03:00
UdjinM6
7188004905
Fix two issues with ResetBlockFailureFlags, add tests (#3965)
* Merge #13199: Bugfix: ensure consistency of m_failed_blocks after reconsiderblock

11fa6bb66e Bugfix: ensure consistency of m_failed_blocks after reconsiderblock (Suhas Daftuar)

Pull request description:

  This was introduced in 015a5258ad and could cause a node to crash (due to assertion failure) when using the `reconsiderblock` rpc.

Tree-SHA512: 820dcd761bf983e36f5d0f16777ed75c833daaf62a6b3a4dbd17f6caaf9287223e3a202d06540ac62f8ba72926b73b0873bb76c6273ddcb19d9408f4c1cd325e

* bugfix: Mark all nearest BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD descendants (if any) as BLOCK_FAILED_VALID while removing the invalidity flag from all ancestors in ResetBlockFailureFlags

Fixes `Assertion failed: ((pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) == 0), function CheckBlockIndex`

* tests: Make sure ResetBlockFailureFlags does the job correctly

* Wait for the expected block height, check the final chain tip hash

Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
2021-02-01 11:15:46 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
b07a7b810c
Backport 11796 + 11774 (#3612)
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention

5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.

Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80

* update violation count

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests

6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:

      tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
      tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
      tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
      tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
      tests for mining features are named mining_...
      tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
      tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...

  Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.

Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16

* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py

Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci: Fix excluded test names

* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
2020-07-17 02:44:20 +03:00