Commit Graph

23365 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
UdjinM6
2fe18b9b1d
fix(tests): Bumps in wait_for_tx/instantlock (#5301)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. we need to move time forward to let invs being relayed
2. nNextInvSend in SendMessages can be bumped up to 30+ seconds into the
future in rare cases
make sure timeouts in tests are high enough to relay tx inv/wait for
corresponding islock

## What was done?
tl;dr: bump mocktime while waiting, wait longer
extracted fixes from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5288 but I
expect this to fix other sporadic test failures too

## How Has This Been Tested?
tests are ok locally and in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5288

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-07 18:08:37 +03:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
cc7be07fb9
ci: retry non-deterministic tests and report failure only if limit exhausted (#4793)
## Motivation

Dash Core has a series of functional tests that do not behave in a
deterministic fashion and have a higher chance of failure, especially on
resource limited systems. This results in a lot of false-negatives
during CI runs, prompting the need to re-run them, which is annoying at
best and generates apathy towards CI failure at worst.

## History

The first approach was to isolate non-deterministic tests into their own
distinct GItLab runner, making it such that if a test failed, only that
one runner had to be restarted, instead of the multiple runners that
failed due to these tests.

One problem with this was that this approach effectively omitted these
tests from TSan and UBSan coverage as attempting to combine TSan and
UBSan would cause significant resource exhaustion.

## Description

An alternative approach is to introduce a new flag, `--retries`,
applicable only on non-deterministic tests, that allow a failed test to
be repeated up to a set number of times (default: 3), only reporting
failure once the limit is exhausted.

A limitation of this is that only the log dump from the last attempt
will be available.

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-06 23:55:52 -05:00
UdjinM6
b0f7612f2c
Merge pull request #5278 from knst/bc-bp-v20-missing-1
backport: bitcoin#13072, #14096, #14161, #15831, #16250, #16251, #17049, #17056, #17138, #18032 (rpc_createmultisig.py and some extra)
2023-04-06 20:16:04 +03:00
MarcoFalke
baa37c345c Merge #17138: Remove wallet access to some node arguments
This backports also includes extra changes that were missing from bitcoin#14711
They are required, otherwise impossible to remove validaion.h dependency as it meant in #17138

b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002 [wallet] Remove pruning check for -rescan option (John Newbery)
eea462de9c652dca556ad241d2126b10790f67f8 [wallet] Remove package limit config access from wallet (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Removes wallet access to `-limitancestorcount`, `-limitdescendantcount` and `-prune`:

  - `-limitancestorcount` and `-limitdescendantcount` are now accessed with a method `getPackageLimits` in the `Chain` interface.
  - `-prune` is not required. It was only used in wallet component initiation to prevent running `-rescan` when pruning was enabled. This check is not required.

  Partially addresses #17137.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    Tested ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002
  promag:
    Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002.
  ariard:
    ACK b96ed03, check there isn't left anymore wallet access to node arguments.

Tree-SHA512: 90c8e3e083acbd37724f1bccf63dab642cf9ae95cc5e684872a67443ae048b4fdbf57b52ea47c5a1da6489fd277278fe2d9bbe95e17f3d4965a1a0fbdeb815bf
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
d82ec8bb6b fix: dashification for rpc_createmultisig introduced in bitcoin#13072
- updated data file with dash addresses
 - removed witness/bench32 support from rpc_createmultisig.py
 - other specific changes, such as wallet balances after N mined blocks
 - updated descriptors for multisort sign (fixes for bitcoin#17056)
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
4e19d00773 backport: follow-up new rpc_createmultisig.py (bitcoin#13072) - changes from bitcoin#17675 2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
MarcoFalke
dceee33ebe Merge #18032: rpc: Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress
19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046 Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  Give a descriptor from `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress`.

  Extracted from #16528 with `addmultisgaddress` and tests added.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    tACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046
  promag:
    Code review ACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046.
  meshcollider:
    utACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046

Tree-SHA512: e813125fbbc358ea8d45b1748de16a29a94efd83175b748fb8fa3b0bfc8e783ed36b6c554d84f5d4ead1ba252a83a3e937b6c3f75da7b8d3b4e55f94d6013771
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
fanquake
be3b359fa3 Merge #17056: descriptors: Introduce sortedmulti descriptor
4bb660be90a2811b53855bf1fd33a8dd9ba3db47 Add release note (Andrew Chow)
ed96b295d747738334459490c79b7360ab85aaf7 Update descriptors.md to include sortedmulti (Andrew Chow)
80be78ea75ac9833ee3db3d468ed09fc4fe6274c Test sortedmulti descriptor using BIP 67 tests (Andrew Chow)
6f588fd2276e5b713c6d36e3b01288484ddb59c0 Add sortedmulti descriptor and unit tests (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  Adds a `sortedmulti()` descriptor as mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17023#issuecomment-537596416.

  `sortedmulti()` works in the same way as `multi` does but sorts the pubkeys in the resulting scripts in lexicographic order as described in [BIP67](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0067.mediawiki). Note that this does not add support for BIP67 nor is BIP67 fully supported by this descriptor (which is why it is not named `multi67()`) as it does not require compressed pubkeys.

  Tests from BIP67 were added and documentation was updated.

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    re-ACK 4bb660be90
  Sjors:
    re-ACK 4bb660be90a2811b53855bf1fd33a8dd9ba3db47

Tree-SHA512: 93b21112a74ebe0bf316d8f3e0291f69fd975cf0a29332f9728e7b880cad312b8b14007e86adcd7899f117b9303cbcf4cb35f3bb2f2f648d1a446f83f75a70a5
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
fanquake
993418041c Merge #16251: Improve signrawtransaction error reporting
ec4c79326bb670c2cc1757ecfb1900f8460c5257 signrawtransaction*: improve error for partial signing (Anthony Towns)
3c481f8921bbc587cf287329f39243abe703b868 signrawtransactionwithkey: better error messages for bad redeemScript/witnessScript (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  Two fixes for `signrawtransactionwith{key,wallet}` (in addition to #16250): one that checks redeemScript/witnessScript matches scriptPubKey (and if both are provided that they match each other sanely), and the other changes the warning when some-but-not-all the signatures for a CHECKMULTISIG are provided to something that suggests more signatures may be all that's required.

  Fixes: #13218
  Fixes: #14823

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    utACK ec4c79326b
  achow101:
    Code Review ACK ec4c79326bb670c2cc1757ecfb1900f8460c5257
  meshcollider:
    utACK ec4c79326bb670c2cc1757ecfb1900f8460c5257

Tree-SHA512: 0c95c91d498e85b834662b9e5c83f336ed5fd306be7701ce1dbfa0836fbeb448a267a796585512f7496e820be668b07c2a0a2f45e52dc23f09ee7d9c87e42b35
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
MarcoFalke
b44eb21591 Merge #16250: signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript
01174596e69568c434198a86f54cb9ea6740e6c2 signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript param (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  Adding support for "witnessScript" as an alternative to "redeemScript" when using "signrawtransactionwithkey" meant that the `RPCTypeCheckObj()` call in `SignTransaction` can't error out just because either parameter is missing -- it's only a problem if both are missing, which isn't a state `RPCTypeCheckObj()` tests for. This results in the regression described in #16249. This patch adds some code to test for this case and give a similar error, namely:

      error code: -8
      error message:
      Missing redeemScript/witnessScript

  Fixes: #16249

ACKs for top commit:
  meshcollider:
    utACK 01174596e6
  promag:
    ACK 01174596e. Could also write test without `dict`/`del`:

Tree-SHA512: cf51346b7dea551b7f18f2a93c2a336a293b2535c62c03a5263cd2be8c58cf0cc302891da659c167e88ad1a68a756472c3c07e99f71627c61d32886fc5a3a353
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
144ad9eb41 backport: follow-up new rpc_createmultisig.py (bitcoin#13072) - changes from bitcoin#16026 2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
MarcoFalke
3d3bdb4fc1 Merge #15831: test: Add test that addmultisigaddress fails for watchonly addresses
fab6a0a659 test: Add test that addmultisigaddress fails for watchonly addresses (MarcoFalke)
fad81d870a test: Fixup creatmultisig documentation and whitespace (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Just to make sure this is not regressed on accidentally in the future

ACKs for commit fab6a0:
  jonatack:
    ACK fab6a0a659

Tree-SHA512: bf8dcbc752f8910902a995e55ce486621156aa01f112990344815c4aab980298dfecc108e78245a8986a00c3871338ad16fc818a1bce9dfc6b37b9c88851e39d
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
c76d2ecdae backport: follow-up new rpc_createmultisig.py (bitcoin#13072) - changes from bitcoin#13541 2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
08b1df6509 backport: follow-up new rpc_createmultisig.py (bitcoin#13072) - changes from bitcoin#14180 2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Pieter Wuille
2690ef07ae Merge #13072: Update createmultisig RPC to support segwit
f40b3b82df [tests] functional test for createmultisig RPC (Anthony Towns)
b9024fdda3 segwit support for createmultisig RPC (Anthony Towns)
d58055d25f Move AddAndGetDestinationForScript from wallet to outputype module (Anthony Towns)
9a44db2e46 Add outputtype module (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  Adds an "address_type" parameter that accepts "legacy", "p2sh-segwit", and "bech32" to choose the type of address created. Defaults to "legacy" rather than the value of the `-address-type` option for backwards compatibility.

  As part of implementing this, OutputType is moved from wallet into its own module, and `AddAndGetDestinationForScript` is changed to apply to a `CKeyStore` rather than a wallet, and to invoke `keystore.AddCScript(script)` itself rather than expecting the caller to have done that.

  Fixes #12502

Tree-SHA512: a08c1cfa89976e4fd7d29caa90919ebd34a446354d17abb862e99f2ee60ed9bc19d8a21a18547c51dc3812cb9fbed86af0bef2f1e971f62bf95cade4a7d86237
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
MarcoFalke
b10e68ab8c Merge #14161: doc/descriptors.md tweaks
eeeaa29214 descriptors.md: Refer to descriptors as describing instead of matching (Russell Yanofsky)
eb49412562 doc/descriptors.md tweaks (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  Add some implementation details, and tweak phrasing in examples section to be more explicit about how expressions are used for matching.

Tree-SHA512: a9dc7bc0fc370548189a789f31c04bd11103cdd2a99bcb909fa1b1dfa4e78509813dad5d5c9e3db98d66929f45cb5704f5c46ab4cbd800fef22cd8465f80ef33
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
a5add5a87e Merge #14096: Add reference documentation for descriptors language
2b5d6f8df24b381d35b75187c97ae0cc9f7c3ed0 Replace duplcate reference with reference to reference doc (Pieter Wuille)
89709db7a2710456011eac9dcd6a60d5e87b97ae Adjust TODO link (Pieter Wuille)
9254ffcf2d910ecb0f9ecbeef6d40a2008a44870 Add descriptor reference documentation (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

Tree-SHA512: 1ca0d537f9bcbb23266e9a4a02a60013ef8309958fb701f638283887585b5ddea6bc9dab859454ec3a373b1a12a4fd69836e7030417bb2ca43fef26b104c0d65
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
fanquake
b696fb16c7 Merge #17049: contrib: Bump gitian descriptors for 0.20
fa1ad8f06eba5e120c30f07263250bc382891179 build: Bump gitian descriptor versions (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Bump the gitian descriptor versions as a follow-up to #17007.

  Also fixes #17027 with a cherry-pick, and bump the manpages.

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK fa1ad8f06eba5e120c30f07263250bc382891179

Tree-SHA512: c3b669c3797e5febb51a8dd01e2621a7544a291e080d73c47a2a12ea9da84ff904533e68792e2e869ebbdc2226b2fee7517214549e6cc7e988f175098f7c412c
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
UdjinM6
daa7c032ce
Merge pull request #5226 from knst/bc-bp-missing-3
backport: bitcoin#13424, #14092, #14380, #14879, #15693, #16185, #16489, #16556, #16806, #16866, #16873, partial #16197, fixes for #10637
2023-04-06 20:15:22 +03:00
Samuel Dobson
e4fcb170cf Merge #16873: rpc: fix regression in gettransaction
1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack)
0f34f54888f680bfbe7a29ac278636d7178a99bb rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Closes #16872.

  PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change.

  This PR:

  - takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866,

  - addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and

  - updates the help, functional test, and release note.

  Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    tACK 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b

Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
Samuel Dobson
234d472944 Merge #16866: wallet: Rename 'decode' argument in gettransaction method to 'verbose'
7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919 [wallet] Rename 'decode' argument in gettransaction method to 'verbose' (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  This makes the RPC method consistent with other RPC methods that have a
  'verbose' option.

  Change the name of the return object from 'decoded' to details.

  Update help text.

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    ACK 7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919.
  meshcollider:
    Code review ACK 7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919
  0xB10C:
    ACK 7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919: reviewed code

Tree-SHA512: a3a62265c8e6e914591f3b3b9f9dd4f42240dc8dab9cbac6ed8d8b8319b6cc847db2ad1689d5440c162e0698f31e39fc6b868ed918b2f62879d61b9865cae66b
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MarcoFalke
0b30e0f8fe Merge #16197: net: Use mockable time for tx download
/**
 * Dash specific comment
 *
 * Seems as event on_getdata works in our P2PInterface.
 * But somehow it's never called for test 'test_in_flight_max',
 * it may be due to bug in net_processing.
 * Due to that, part of functional tests is disabled
 */

fab365835639a3da03f8ad9a58a0db6c6c4c2314 [qa] Test that getdata requests work as expected (Suhas Daftuar)
fa883ab35ad2d4328e35b1e855d0833740a6b910 net: Use mockable time for tx download (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Two commits:

  * First commit changes to mockable time for tx download (refactoring, should only have an effect on regtest)
  * Second commit adds a test that uses mocktime to test tx download

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    code review ACK 16197/commits/fab365835639a3da03f8ad9a58a0db6c6c4c2314
  jamesob:
    ACK fab3658356

Tree-SHA512: 3a64a3e283ec4bab1f6e506404b11f0a564a5b61d2a7508ae738a61f035e57220484c66e0ae47d847fe9f7e3ff5cc834909d7b34a9bbcea6abe01f8742806908

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
fanquake
af24beb907 Merge #16489: log: harmonize bitcoind logging
e90478f43e7bf9726ba033fde4a2776f9d5a9af4 log: harmonize bitcoind server logging (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Harmonize the user-facing output of the  `bitcoind -daemon`, `bitcoin-cli help stop`, `bitcoin-cli stop`, and `bitcoind -version` commands to be consistent with each other as well as with the "Bitcoin Core is probably already running" messages, e.g. `git grep 'probably already running.")'`.

  Before:

  ```
  $ bitcoind -regtest -daemon
  Bitcoin Core daemon starting

  $ bitcoind -regtest -daemon
  Error: Bitcoin Core is probably already running.

  $ bitcoind -regtest -version
  Bitcoin Core Daemon version v0.18.99.0-e653eeff76-dirty

  $ bitcoin-cli -regtest help stop
  stop

  Stop Bitcoin server.

  $ bitcoin-cli -regtest stop
  Bitcoin server stopping
  ```
  these five commands output:

  "Bitcoin Core daemon"
  "Bitcoin Core"
  "Bitcoin Core Daemon"
  "Bitcoin server"
  "Bitcoin server"

  After this commit, they are all "Bitcoin Core".

  ```
  $ bitcoind -regtest -daemon
  Bitcoin Core starting

  $ bitcoind -regtest -daemon
  Error: Bitcoin Core is probably already running.

  $ bitcoind -regtest -version
  Bitcoin Core version v0.18.99.0-e90478f43e-dirty

  $ bitcoin-cli -regtest help stop
  stop

  Request a graceful shutdown of Bitcoin Core.

  $ bitcoin-cli -regtest stop
  Bitcoin Core stopping
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK e90478f43e7bf9726ba033fde4a2776f9d5a9af4 (read code which looks good)
  practicalswift:
    ACK e90478f43e7bf9726ba033fde4a2776f9d5a9af4 -- diff looks correct
  fjahr:
    utACK e90478f
  michaelfolkson:
    ACK e90478f43e7bf9726ba033fde4a2776f9d5a9af4. Tested command outputs and as described.
  ariard:
    Tested ACK e90478f
  fanquake:
    ACK e90478f43e7bf9726ba033fde4a2776f9d5a9af4

Tree-SHA512: 9ee584d260b5c224463318a51c2856a7c0e463be039fea072e5d5bab8898f0043b3930cf887a47aafd0f3447adb551b5e47a4e98ebdefc6cdb8e77edde0347b0
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MarcoFalke
221c91a671 Merge #16806: doc: Add issue templates for bug and feature request
fabca7756d6908ad581f3a699f1be6ecc9f62e03 doc: Add issue templates for bug and feature request (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #16627

  Can be tested via https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin/issues

ACKs for top commit:
  jb55:
    ACK fabca7756d6908ad581f3a699f1be6ecc9f62e03
  fanquake:
    ACK fabca7756d6908ad581f3a699f1be6ecc9f62e03

Tree-SHA512: 1ebe58f9c0110a9332adf1d80001cd9ed6fe60208e387c93b8564dc66821f753e34b23cb6f4cae45168024862ee884913976e132820b7a4759fa6391b0d1127c
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MeshCollider
4c72e6966d Merge #16185: gettransaction: add an argument to decode the transaction
9965940e35c445ccded55510348af228ff22f0e9 doc: Add release note for the new gettransaction argument (darosior)
b8b3f0435a2837d3897e9e232ef6ca839ce74eb8 tests: Add a new functional test for gettransaction (darosior)
7f3bb247a811582d1aa4805d8e601c19808dc7ba gettransaction: add an argument to decode the transaction (darosior)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds a new parameter to the `gettransaction` call : `decode`. If set to `true`, it will add a new `decoded` field to the response. This mimics the behavior of `getrawtransaction`'s `verbose` argument to avoid using 2 calls if we want to decode a wallet transaction (`gettransaction` then `decoderawtransaction`).

  Fix #16181 .

ACKs for top commit:
  meshcollider:
    re-utACK 9965940e35c445ccded55510348af228ff22f0e9

Tree-SHA512: bcb6b4bd252b3488d6afc77659c499c2ad99fd58661eb24b6a2e17014c74f22e47fde70e00fedb4f4754915786622ad02483b2cf2c4dea0ab0eb4ac8276dbeee
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
fanquake
0c05d0b59d Merge #16556: Fix systemd service file configuration directory setup
f3b57f4a1c17aadbf02d408e980490c88838c6ba Unrecommend making config file owned by bitcoin (setpill)
870d4152dfc3d990e336723562948835c2dbd646 Set ProtectHome in systemd service file (setpill)
639a416e3758b3005b860b198f0ec7bdd80a7f0c Chgrp config dir to bitcoin in systemd service (setpill)
aded0528f0e1e3735ce8dd26fd9e546150b73187 Improve clarity of systemd service file comments (setpill)

Pull request description:

  Rationale: ran into a bug with the systemd service file, fixed it locally and figured I might as well contribute my fix.

  Also fixed some unrelated confusing phrasing in the comments of the same file, after discussion in IRC.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipsorcery:
    tACK f3b57f4a1c17aadbf02d408e980490c88838c6ba (nothing changed since previous tACK).
  ryanofsky:
    utACK f3b57f4a1c17aadbf02d408e980490c88838c6ba. Only change since last review is removing ConfigurationDirectoryMode churn in early commits

Tree-SHA512: 2188345878925b9e8a5c2c3df8dfba443720e2252a164db54a8e1d8007846721497b2d98c56f1d9b60a9a9ed4fdb1156c7b02c699616b220a9b614671617d32a
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MarcoFalke
8b0f3f7945 Merge #14879: qt: Add warning messages to the debug window
593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97 Add warning messages to the debug window (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Fix: #11016

  This PR adds warning messages to the debug window in `-disablewallet` mode.

  ![screenshot from 2018-12-06 01-01-27](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/49550070-413c1c80-f8f3-11e8-9865-efb49ea8da45.png)

ACKs for top commit:
  jonasschnelli:
    utACK 593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97
  promag:
    ACK 593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97, agree with @Sjors https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14879#pullrequestreview-196433092 above.
  ryanofsky:
    utACK 593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97

Tree-SHA512: a8ca78529bb16813ba7bfaf5ccd4349189979f08e78ea857746a6fb00fd9d7ed98d8f06f384830acba21dac57070060af23f6be8249398feb32a6efff1333de8

14879 followup: move label_alerts css styling into css files and align it with the style of labelAlerts on OverviewPage

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MarcoFalke
27b5d68562 Merge #15693: travis: Switch to ubuntu keyserver to avoid timeouts
fa2056af1c travis: Properly cache and error on timeout (MarcoFalke)
fa36a333ee travis: Switch to ubuntu keyserver to avoid timeouts (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  The other keyserver is consistently timing out on travis: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/512689710#L405

  Attempt to fix it by using a different server.

  Also:
  * fixes #15372
  * fixes #15738

ACKs for commit fa2056:
  ryanofsky:
    utACK fa2056af1c71aded3a821a07ec4de71c4be0bca3. All good changes (changing keyserver, getting rid of keyserver while loop, clarifying travis error, moving travis documentation to code comment).

Tree-SHA512: ac8436616ecfee0ed579114e19f03c53ceb688fbcd95a60cffe8f15b4e569772a6ba673f353bbd789e79fe27fc5626c77fab4086768844dd51e0c6c108b52fb2
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MarcoFalke
b804c7d7fe Merge #14380: fix assert crash when specified change output spend size is unknown
0fb2e69815 CreateTransaction: Assume minimum p2sh-p2wpkh spend size for unknown change (Gregory Sanders)
b06483c96a Remove stale comment in CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  This is triggered anytime a fundraw type call(psbt or legacy) is used with a change output address that the wallet doesn't know how to sign for.

  This regression was added in 6a34ff5335 since BnB coin selection actually cares about this.

  The fix is to assume the smallest typical spend, a P2SH-P2WPKH, which is calculated using a "prototype" dummy signature flow. Future work could generalize this infrastructure to get estimated sizes of inputs for a variety of types.

  I also removed a comment which I believe is stale and misleading.

Tree-SHA512: c7e2be189e524f81a7aa4454ad9370cefba715e3781f1e462c8bab77e4d27540191419029e3ebda11e3744c0703271e479dcd560d05e4d470048d9633e34da16
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
1755033048 fix: follow up bitcoin#10637: returned nBytes should be signed 2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
MarcoFalke
2cae37806b Merge #13424: Consistently validate txid / blockhash length and encoding in rpc calls
5eb20f81d9 Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
  an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
  these alternative calls.

  Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
  IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
  "must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
  "must be hexadecimal string (not X)" in that case.

  Split from #13420

Tree-SHA512: f0786b41c0d7793ff76e4b2bb35547873070bbf7561d510029e8edb93f59176277efcd4d183b3185532ea69fc0bbbf3dbe9e19362e8017007ae9d51266cd78ae
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
8eb04b2f1f Merge #14092: tests: Dry run bench_bitcoin as part "make check" to allow for quick identification of assertion/sanitizer failures in benchmarking code
Follow-up this earlier merged backport - removed unused variable RUN_BENCH
2023-04-06 20:14:58 +03:00
PastaPastaPasta
68b6677c53
Merge pull request #5296 from PastaPastaPasta/v19.0.0-rc.10-branch
chore: backport and version bump for rc.10
2023-04-06 11:36:18 -05:00
pasta
ebe5ef84a6
chore: bump to rc.10 2023-04-06 11:23:58 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
a326487a08
chore: v19 starttime and timeout bump (#5300)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?
Mainnet activation start time is set to: `Tuesday, April 25, 2023
0:00:00`,
and timeout to: `Thursday, April 25, 2024 0:00:00`

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 11:23:57 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
b5b799ea8b
feat(qt): added hpmn count in qt information window (#5293)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented


## What was done?
Added a new label showing the number of total and enabled HPMN.
The existing label was updated to show the number of total and enabled
regular MNs instead.

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 11:23:57 -05:00
UdjinM6
088cfc30ab
fix: add passed HPMN payments to the list in GetProjectedMNPayees (#5298)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Not having them in the list is 1. wrong 2. creates empty entries in
results (nullptr-s)
Should fix crashes like
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5287#issuecomment-1498518599

## What was done?
Add missing entries

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run dash-qt on testnet, wait when a HPMN is the payee. develop - crash,
this PR - no crash.

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 11:23:57 -05:00
UdjinM6
fec09df98f
fix(governance): use weighted mn count (#5299)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
vote thresholds were counted incorrectly

## What was done?
switch from `GetValidMNsCount()` to `GetValidWeightedMNsCount()`


## How Has This Been Tested?
...

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 11:23:57 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
18d4b007c8
chore: v19 starttime and timeout bump (#5300)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?
Mainnet activation start time is set to: `Tuesday, April 25, 2023
0:00:00`,
and timeout to: `Thursday, April 25, 2024 0:00:00`

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 11:15:42 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
611f3f03ca
Merge pull request #5292 from UdjinM6/bp16633
backport: Merge #16633: travis: Fix test_runner.py timeouts
2023-04-06 09:55:57 -05:00
MarcoFalke
cb3ed877c3 Merge #16633: travis: Fix test_runner.py timeouts
faba46da07cd8383d0bc841d37ea9cacba60e354 ci: Set --ansi in test_runner (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixup to:

  *  tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard output is a terminal #16561

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK faba46da07cd8383d0bc841d37ea9cacba60e354 -- diff looks correct
  fanquake:
    ACK faba46da07cd8383d0bc841d37ea9cacba60e354 - assuming Travis is all green.

Tree-SHA512: 50bf6ec8e7a2987d77821816289fd87458e63237d419a149e5e04027387d2c4b3c23db58977585fda30fbc4b13686a7def0d9e00096b9a8469dea2916fd30565
2023-04-06 09:55:22 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
7d548dea2c
feat(qt): added hpmn count in qt information window (#5293)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented


## What was done?
Added a new label showing the number of total and enabled HPMN.
The existing label was updated to show the number of total and enabled
regular MNs instead.

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 09:26:15 -05:00
UdjinM6
f53f41f572
fix: add passed HPMN payments to the list in GetProjectedMNPayees (#5298)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Not having them in the list is 1. wrong 2. creates empty entries in
results (nullptr-s)
Should fix crashes like
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5287#issuecomment-1498518599

## What was done?
Add missing entries

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run dash-qt on testnet, wait when a HPMN is the payee. develop - crash,
this PR - no crash.

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 09:23:26 -05:00
UdjinM6
db2fcd004c
fix(governance): use weighted mn count (#5299)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
vote thresholds were counted incorrectly

## What was done?
switch from `GetValidMNsCount()` to `GetValidWeightedMNsCount()`


## How Has This Been Tested?
...

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-06 09:19:32 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
5354515dec
test: added threshold_signature_tests (#5279)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?
Added BLS threshold signature unit tests.
Similar test is already present in bls_signatures but it won't hurt us
to have it Dash repo as well.


## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-06 00:13:59 -05:00
Oleg Girko
7097e216d9
fix: Fix missing includes (#5295)
The `<stdexcept>` include is needed for `std::runtime_error` definition.
The `<cstdint>` include is needed for `uint8_t` and `uint32_t`
definition.

## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Compilation failure with GCC 13.
GCC 13 is more strict about missing includes that were included
indirectly by previous versions of GCC.


## What was done?
Added missing includes.

## How Has This Been Tested?
Successful compilation on Fedora 38 with GCC 13. All tests passed
successfully.


## Breaking Changes
None.


## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Co-authored-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
2023-04-05 21:27:21 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
9c8a6066b3
Merge pull request #5289 from UdjinM6/merge_master_18.2.2
chore: Merge master 18.2.2 back into develop
2023-04-05 21:27:05 -05:00
UdjinM6
e8b5e4ac93
trivial(doc): fix typos in getrawtransaction and decoderawtransaction help texts (#5290)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix typos in getrawtransaction and decoderawtransaction help texts

## What was done?
tweak field name to match
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/src/core_write.cpp#L192

## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-05 21:26:51 -05:00
UdjinM6
8afb8e975e
fix(qt): should use weighted mn count when calculating payments in Masternodes tab (#5287)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes tab was showing UNKNOWN next payment for some enabled MNs

reported by @kxcd aka xkcd

## What was done?
ask for the maximum data available, let GetProjectedMNPayees crop it

## How Has This Been Tested?
run dash-qt, check the list on Masternodes tab

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-05 21:26:39 -05:00
UdjinM6
dfd091e5bc
refactor/fix: replace expired requests with a new one in RequestQuorumData (#5286)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should fix "qdata: Already received" discouraging issue

the root of the issue is that we remove expired requests on
UpdatedBlockTip which is too late sometimes.

## What was done?
replacing expired requests with a new one in RequestQuorumData kind of
does the same (drops the expired request) but without waiting for
UpdatedBlockTip

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-05 21:26:03 -05:00