## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
small cleanups and improvements
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
see
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/actions/runs/4715728701/jobs/8362893373?pr=5330
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
5449d44e37982fcd5251fd47873c5f7d34c39fc9 scripts: prevent GCC optimising test symbols in test-symbol-check (fanquake)
Pull request description:
I noticed in #22381 that when the test-symbol-check target was being built with Clang and run in the CI it would fail due to using a too-new version of `pow` (used [here](d67330d112/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py (L85))). Our CIs use Focal (glibc 2.31) and the version of `pow` was the optimized version introduced in [glibc 2.29](https://lwn.net/Articles/778286/):
```bash
* Optimized generic exp, exp2, log, log2, pow, sinf, cosf, sincosf and tanf.
```
This made sense, except for that if it was failing when built using Clang, why hadn't it also been failing when being built with GCC?
Turns out GCC is optimizing away that call to `pow` at all optimization levels, including `-O0`, see: https://godbolt.org/z/53MhzMxT7, and this has been the case forever, or at least since GCC 5.x. Clang on the other hand, will only optimize away the `pow` call at `-O1` and `-O2`, not `-O0`: https://godbolt.org/z/Wbnqj3q6c. Thus when this test was built with Clang (we don't pass `-O` so we default to `-O0`) it was failing in the CI environment, because it would actually have a call to the "new" `pow`.
Avoid this issue by using a symbol that won't be optimized away, or that we are unlikely to ever have versioning issues with.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 5449d44e37982fcd5251fd47873c5f7d34c39fc9
Tree-SHA512: 3a26c5c3a5f2905fd0dd90892470e241ba625c0af3be2629d06d5da3a97534c1d6a55b796bbdd41e2e6a26a8fab7d981b98c45d4238565b0eb7edf3c5da02007
5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5 Add FoundBlock.found member (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the block was found.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5
jamesob:
ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5 ([`jamesob/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock))
Zero-1729:
crACK 5c5d0b6
Tree-SHA512: d906e1b7100ff72c3aa06d80bd77673887b2db670ebd52dce7c4f6f557a23a1744c6109308228a37fda6c6ea74f05ba0efecff0ef235ab06ea8acd861fbb8675
faa86b71acefc8f2e366746a1c251888e6e686dd fuzz: Use ConsumeUInt256 helper to simplify rolling_bloom_filter fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
aaaa61fd306e25379e6222e31bf160a6eb04f74e fuzz: Speed up rolling_bloom_filter fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Reproducer from OSS-Fuzz (without bug report):
[clusterfuzz-testcase-rolling_bloom_filter-5980807721254912.log](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/6822159/clusterfuzz-testcase-rolling_bloom_filter-5980807721254912.log)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faa86b71acefc8f2e366746a1c251888e6e686dd
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK faa86b71acefc8f2e366746a1c251888e6e686dd
Tree-SHA512: eace588509dfddb2ba97baf86379fa713fa6eb758184abff676cb95807ff8ff36905eeaddeba05665b8464c35c57e2138f88caec71cbfb255e546bbe76558da0
faafda232e1d4f79ee64dbfee699a8018f25b0bc fuzz: Speed up prevector fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Should fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35981
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faafda232e1d4f79ee64dbfee699a8018f25b0bc
Tree-SHA512: 1bf166c4a99a8ce88bdc030cd6a32ce1da5251b73873772e0e9c001ec2bacafebb183f7c8c88806d0ab633aada2cff8b78791f5c9c0c6f2cc8ef5f0875c4b2ef
aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0 fuzz: Extend addrman fuzz test with deserialize (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Requested on IRC:
```
[18:01] <vasild> => I think there is a good chance fuzzing addrman unserialize will find more bugs
[18:04] <sipa> definitely
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0 per `git diff fa74025 aaaa9c6`
vasild:
ACK aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0
Tree-SHA512: f57d0aecf22a933e48d3181d7398218949588dd0de31218d1d28c825649e55fd60b0de6fbc92d2497cf5639a4adc2061c9bf8216546a2be916feac4f03f16e8f
fb7be92b094477131140b58a4e3ae98366b93e76 Mark print-% target as phony. (Dmitry Goncharov)
Pull request description:
.PHONY does not take patterns (such as print-%) as prerequisites.
Have print-% depend on force and mark force as phony.
This change ensures print-% rule works even when there is a file that matches the target.
```
$ # on master
$ make print-host
host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
$ touch print-host
$ make print-host
make: 'print-host' is up to date.
$
$ git co mark_print_as_phony
Switched to branch 'mark_print_as_phony'
$ make print-host
host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
$ touch force
$ make print-host
host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fb7be92b094477131140b58a4e3ae98366b93e76, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: b89ae66aa8c7aa6a7ab5f0956f9eb3b3ef9d56994b60dc2a97d498d4c1bba537845c190723e8a10310280b1b35df2cd935cc30aeb76735cac2dc621ad7823772
906d7913117c8f10934b37afa27ae8ac565da042 fuzz: add missing ECCVerifyHandle to base_encode_decode (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
It is possible to trigger a fuzztest failure in the `base_encode_decode` by asking it to decode any PSBT that has HD keypaths in it. For example, this one
```
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
```
which I took straight from the PSBT test vectors. The reason is that in src/psbt.h we call `DeserializeHDKeypaths`, which in turn calls `CPubKey::IsFullyValid`, which in turn asserts that a secp context has been created.
The error appears to be masked on many systems by the definition of `instance_of_eccryptoclosure` in src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp, which defines a static object which contains an `ECCVerifyHandle`. If you just comment out that line you can reliably trigger the fuzz test failure, e.g. by creating a file `crash` with the above PSBT, and runnnig
```
ASAN_OPTIONS=symbolize=0:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:strict_init_order=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=suppressions=./test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1 FUZZ=base_encode_decode ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz -seed_inputs=crash
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 906d7913117c8f10934b37afa27ae8ac565da042
Tree-SHA512: b98b60573c21efe28503fe351883c6f0d9ac99d0dd6f100537b16ac53476617b8a3f899faf0c23d893d34a01b3bbe4a784499ec6f9c7000292e850bed449bd85
9550dffa0c61df6d1591c62d09629b4c5731e1b7 fuzz: Assert roundtrip equality for `CPubKey` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a (quite late) follow-up to #19237 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19237#issuecomment-642203251). Looking at `CPubKey::Serialize` and `CPubKey::Unserialize` I can't think of a scenario where the roundtrip (serialization/deserialization) equality wouldn't hold.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
crACK 9550dffa0c pending CI
Tree-SHA512: 640fb9e777d249769b22ee52c0b15a68ff0645b16c986e1c0bce9742155d14f1be601e591833e1dc8dcffebf271966c6b861b90888a44aae1feae2e0248e2c55
fa483e9f68b8b4171dabb25cc88dc2eada454a99 fuzz: Speed up crypto fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
May fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34962
Similar solution to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22005
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa483e9f68b8b4171dabb25cc88dc2eada454a99: patch looks correct and rationale makes sense
Tree-SHA512: 3788cf9f6ba0f7a0a217cd3a6a825839689425e99e4d6d657981d291a001b0da7c5abb50a68b4ee1c2a8300b87fb92e4e3ccc1171907792b40251e467c33bd53
d44a261acff40c1c8727d3cc0106bde65a6416d0 Fix issues when `walletdir` is root directory (unknown)
Pull request description:
+ Remove one character less from wallet path
+ After testing lot of random strings with special chars in `wallet_name`, I found that the issue was not related to special characters in the name. Reviewing PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21907 helped me resolve the issue.
**Real issue**: If the path mentioned in `walletdir` is a root directory, first character of the wallet name or path is removed
**Solution**: `if` statement to check `walletdir` is a root directory
Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21510https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21501
Related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20080
Consider the wallet directories `w1` and `w2` saved in `D:\`. Run `bitcoind.exe -walletdir=D:\`, Results for `bitcoin-cli.exe listwalletdir`:
Before this PR:
```
{
"wallets": [
{
"name": "1"
},
{
"name": "2"
}
]
}
```
After this PR:
```
"wallets": [
{
"name": "w1"
},
{
"name": "w2"
}
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d44a261acff40c1c8727d3cc0106bde65a6416d0
meshcollider:
utACK d44a261acff40c1c8727d3cc0106bde65a6416d0
Tree-SHA512: b09b00f727407e3771c8694861dae1bfd29d97a0d51ddcb5d9c0111dc618b3fff2f75829cbb4361c54457ee564e94fcefd9e2928262a1c918a2b6bbad724eb55
1be6267ce1ee142c3b90baed1925a82eab6514aa fuzz: don't try and use fopencookie when building for Android (fanquake)
Pull request description:
When building for Android, `_GNU_SOURCE` will be defined:
```bash
/home/ubuntu/android-sdk/ndk/22.1.7171670/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/linux-x86_64/bin/aarch64-linux-android30-clang++ -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#define _LP64 1
#define __AARCH64EL__ 1
#define __AARCH64_CMODEL_SMALL__ 1
#define __ANDROID_API__ 30
#define __ANDROID__ 1
#define __ARM_64BIT_STATE 1
.....
```
but it doesn't have the [`fopencookie()` function](https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Streams-and-Cookies.html), or define the `cookie_io_functions_t` type, which results in compile failures:
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:7:
./test/fuzz/util.h:388:15: error: unknown type name 'cookie_io_functions_t'
const cookie_io_functions_t io_hooks = {
^
15 warnings and 1 error generated.
```
Just skip trying to use it if we are building for Android. Should fix#22062.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1be6267ce1ee142c3b90baed1925a82eab6514aa
Tree-SHA512: d62f63d0624af04b76c7e07b0332c71eca2bf9cd9e096a60aea9e212b7bbc1548e9fa9a76d065ec719bb345fe8726619c3bd2d0631f54d877c82972b7b289321
d8f1ea7227260e51c340271fc9a43866799b8ac4 doc: describe in fuzzing.md how to reproduce a CI crash (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Not sure if this is 100% accurate or missing any pertinent info, but I misremembered how to do this today and it seems like useful information to provide.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d8f1ea7227260e51c340271fc9a43866799b8ac4
Tree-SHA512: 1b74e4187e6ea13b04eb03b3c6e2615c4eb18cc38cce215ad1645f8b135c5c31a243748eb313ccec05f1f62187ba33d550119acf07088968d2d2c1c09bc4c653
0ccb3addf68067200892963521a92713c4667a63 tests: Remove no longer needed UBSan suppression (float-divide-by-zero in validation.cpp) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove no longer needed UBSan suppression.
The float divide-by-zero in `validation.cpp` was fixed by instagibbs in ec30a79f1c430cc7fbda37e5d747b0b31b262fa5 (#15283).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0ccb3addf68067200892963521a92713c4667a63
Tree-SHA512: 89a4f4b7371fa5725d9f801cee7ebbd17523f66017c9acfa813657dcb8d837f42209eff44ce9e5d48296a630bab9599d75f10024a0c7da7defb228f4eae3392a
5e146022daa4336de94447e5b8e5418296286927 wallet: fix scanning progress calculation for single block range (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes are equal, and with that also the estimated start/stop verification progress values) the progress calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero (0.0/0.0), resulting in an invalid JSON result for the `getwalletinfo` RPC. This PR fixes this behaviour by setting the progress to zero in that special case. Fixes#20297.
The behaviour can easily be reproduced by continuously running single block rescans in an endless loop, e.g. via
```bash
#!/bin/bash
while true
do
bitcoin-cli rescanblockchain $(bitcoin-cli getblockcount)
done
```
and at the same time perform some `getwalletinfo` RPCs.
On the master branch, this leads to frequent invalid responses (tested on mainchain):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo
error: couldn't parse reply from server
$ curl --user `cat ~/.bitcoin/.cookie` --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getwalletinfo", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
{"result":{"walletname":"","walletversion":169900,"format":"bdb","balance":0.00000000,"unconfirmed_balance":0.00000000,"immature_balance":0.00000000,"txcount":0,"keypoololdest":1603677276,"keypoolsize":1000,"hdseedid":"3196e33ecb47c7130e6ca60f2f895f9259860dca","keypoolsize_hd_internal":1000,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"private_keys_enabled":true,"avoid_reuse":false,"scanning":{"duration":0,"progress":},"descriptors":false},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}
```
(note that missing value for "progress" in the JSON result).
On the PR branch, the behaviour doesn't occur anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e146022daa4336de94447e5b8e5418296286927
promag:
Core review ACK 5e146022daa4336de94447e5b8e5418296286927.
Tree-SHA512: f0e6aad5a6cd08b36c5fe820fff0ef26663229b39169a4dbe757f3c795a41cf5c69c9dc90efe7515675ae1059307f8971123781a0514d10704123a6f28b125ab
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bad coding in governance code
## What was done?
Use Enums where possible
## How Has This Been Tested?
Make check
## Breaking Changes
none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Upgraded version of cppcheck
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran cppcheck
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
56e79fe683d36c1944e52326fae3bcc4cb7deec7 guix: use --build={arch}-guix-linux-gnu in cross toolchain (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Technically we are always cross-compiling when Guix building, so make that explicit. `{arch}-guix-linux-gnu` is not a triplet that should be used in any other capacity, but here it serves the purpose of ensuring, that by setting `--build` to something other than `--host/--target`, we are always cross-compiling (in the eyes of autoconf etc) when building our cross toolchains. It looks like `x86_64-linux-gnu` on `x86_64-linux-gnu` currently works because of the triplet canonicalisation, i.e `x86_64-linux-gnu` becomes `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`, and GCCs configure thinking it's cross-compiling, whereas the same canonicalisation doesn't happen for `aarch64-linux-gnu` so we don't get a cross-compile when building on aarch64.
Fixes: #22458.
Guix Build (x86_64):
```bash
e590e67d2b151e7d079f50393c61cacf9e65f5e3fdddc10bffd5dbb59cd9f5e3 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
9222a733209dc73168722ee0f290831d1723f7ed55abc1e243dd3892ef9733f1 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
a4ec01411195412e9a483397554d98b2db161a6be8aceee2dac78f0015f2a8e5 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
a4ff8f2538c1b3a63a3e7c92699c18164b2c4954ebd72c4a854bf7844e6131b6 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
ac6e4dffcf6f49dac73d3677f3fe5edb08ee1127648bc7ec24b217f48a3a4d21 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
ab26467fce9732596b1713179618eee20c2bd44875dc1c39f9afd68f135e8ce4 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
f44108d818d53ee7e70b44361cb3cc6841b7aecbe4fade1fa289263718620824 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
29adfb2d575be8b5a7092b2aff888af2084ad5783bdc74ae3de4b2dd84da7a26 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
3d7640f604bd27cb1ae47853d70378a7631aa436b5c027eae31fa06d4dd20d4a guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
3f8d8fc49cf722a7a13640872762d045c14efd610fba908f0acc99a99032b903 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
b8df097e10e7acded8556a5681da2b0132c0d509b200792f5584c186b8dcaf24 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3.tar.gz
1a605c563038107b88e8d859fa045ca3087241340264eb7125e97b3af36874db guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d10be89a816ee2f47bf778ef4aaa8a7b548403c123a4b4b3aa0470ee7b9472d2 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
839dd079d677c87a91ccc28f6c423657d98212350d3693ae2facb92082d10c88 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
200d7a72a7901b6788e70aa1c6fbbe16144e9dac29beb06242a9dcfe1e88acbe guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
3d207bb57dc45f234d804a9ee615001aa28ac4b59b530a1e7d16d0a72c2ea514 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
16a789c98409d36bd6b69a5ca38cd8886979f50f845265dc0b005c92286a3e4f guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e48f6fae9c2ffeb2bf02ffc073ac69648b2ce4ba87e0ad7a3a5059abf33b8ce2 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
fa8d66af5f202e0c8968114af4dcd6d88099eb91d197dfaaa0144f8ae6b12f4a guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
86cffa62687f4272c899897ff6c1a86e1a7bdbbb7ab09a085b7b1122d3a1f1b2 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e42a7c33da6ea4be5d0826df097bdc7e919c9fd6642e7d59fe3d45a97d9009fa guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
2f9faa88fa0025b9bfade83177b1f50833dc6c3be1ef26c4d5881aa165bcc537 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
fdfe560968c85500dc886d4e12b851cd27a76de860b8cbf1fb6aac95ccd0582e guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
c3c75560befd72a9f13f5626ddf39c63ad25fb9753a4d941e48830b7e06f143e guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
38100946ec1469fdd31aa8ea9e471b317dc278c298c106289c119016c2c0caa0 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
67890771aad89dc0d20b8dcdc6b29bd838ace310e8bcbbc0d16d7afc87d3a474 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
a9772b40c8b9d3c1a0bf9c9db2a60050415bf6a9bd4a19cfd8a038f4a1e712e3 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
01da0561f2c3a268c28615b1573dfdecb6346bf3f8eba7a052488191234ac1d6 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
71324ac0f6fc8163e41031b2fd2d38d2e15bfd5ef4efe4cb45d7974fad474394 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64-debug.zip
219b58281d3c79b2ed7e9085b1e15d7e021fd3899ef07a6ad747058b43d64443 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
fe838d32587c2f942fcd9f9a0b3735611b686a867e2d2040cf3a8aa6a43d09fe guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64-unsigned.tar.gz
13b537217a13293b93afd7c588b3733955c3188f79a3249b363fb4e885b74b32 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64.zip
```
Guix Build (arm64):
```bash
e590e67d2b151e7d079f50393c61cacf9e65f5e3fdddc10bffd5dbb59cd9f5e3 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
9222a733209dc73168722ee0f290831d1723f7ed55abc1e243dd3892ef9733f1 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
a4ec01411195412e9a483397554d98b2db161a6be8aceee2dac78f0015f2a8e5 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
a4ff8f2538c1b3a63a3e7c92699c18164b2c4954ebd72c4a854bf7844e6131b6 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
ac6e4dffcf6f49dac73d3677f3fe5edb08ee1127648bc7ec24b217f48a3a4d21 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
ab26467fce9732596b1713179618eee20c2bd44875dc1c39f9afd68f135e8ce4 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
f44108d818d53ee7e70b44361cb3cc6841b7aecbe4fade1fa289263718620824 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
29adfb2d575be8b5a7092b2aff888af2084ad5783bdc74ae3de4b2dd84da7a26 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
3d7640f604bd27cb1ae47853d70378a7631aa436b5c027eae31fa06d4dd20d4a guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
3f8d8fc49cf722a7a13640872762d045c14efd610fba908f0acc99a99032b903 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-arm64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
b8df097e10e7acded8556a5681da2b0132c0d509b200792f5584c186b8dcaf24 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3.tar.gz
1a605c563038107b88e8d859fa045ca3087241340264eb7125e97b3af36874db guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d10be89a816ee2f47bf778ef4aaa8a7b548403c123a4b4b3aa0470ee7b9472d2 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
839dd079d677c87a91ccc28f6c423657d98212350d3693ae2facb92082d10c88 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
200d7a72a7901b6788e70aa1c6fbbe16144e9dac29beb06242a9dcfe1e88acbe guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
3d207bb57dc45f234d804a9ee615001aa28ac4b59b530a1e7d16d0a72c2ea514 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
16a789c98409d36bd6b69a5ca38cd8886979f50f845265dc0b005c92286a3e4f guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e48f6fae9c2ffeb2bf02ffc073ac69648b2ce4ba87e0ad7a3a5059abf33b8ce2 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
fa8d66af5f202e0c8968114af4dcd6d88099eb91d197dfaaa0144f8ae6b12f4a guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
86cffa62687f4272c899897ff6c1a86e1a7bdbbb7ab09a085b7b1122d3a1f1b2 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e42a7c33da6ea4be5d0826df097bdc7e919c9fd6642e7d59fe3d45a97d9009fa guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
2f9faa88fa0025b9bfade83177b1f50833dc6c3be1ef26c4d5881aa165bcc537 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
fdfe560968c85500dc886d4e12b851cd27a76de860b8cbf1fb6aac95ccd0582e guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
c3c75560befd72a9f13f5626ddf39c63ad25fb9753a4d941e48830b7e06f143e guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
38100946ec1469fdd31aa8ea9e471b317dc278c298c106289c119016c2c0caa0 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
67890771aad89dc0d20b8dcdc6b29bd838ace310e8bcbbc0d16d7afc87d3a474 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
a9772b40c8b9d3c1a0bf9c9db2a60050415bf6a9bd4a19cfd8a038f4a1e712e3 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
01da0561f2c3a268c28615b1573dfdecb6346bf3f8eba7a052488191234ac1d6 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
71324ac0f6fc8163e41031b2fd2d38d2e15bfd5ef4efe4cb45d7974fad474394 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64-debug.zip
219b58281d3c79b2ed7e9085b1e15d7e021fd3899ef07a6ad747058b43d64443 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
fe838d32587c2f942fcd9f9a0b3735611b686a867e2d2040cf3a8aa6a43d09fe guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64-unsigned.tar.gz
13b537217a13293b93afd7c588b3733955c3188f79a3249b363fb4e885b74b32 guix-build-56e79fe683d3/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-56e79fe683d3-win64.zip
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 56e79fe683d36c1944e52326fae3bcc4cb7deec7
Tree-SHA512: 628ab6cda80069ad277107639bef21b44a8417198862e9ec89b45a2c41741d29aeb79aa58c5a90283fb96cf707494ae948ac790abde809bb18c86b14af999200
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] ~~I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas~~ N/A
- [ ] ~~I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests~~ N/A
- [ ] ~~I have made corresponding changes to the documentation~~ N/A
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Develop doesn't build: ./autogen.sh fails
## What was done?
remove newline
## How Has This Been Tested?
./autogen.sh
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Converts some CCriticalSections with Mutexes; other minor refactoring
in
0fce09d1f0
see before
<img width="771" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6443210/225969163-bb4cee62-3e6a-4224-980a-11b2e0024a60.png">
and after
<img width="766" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6443210/225969245-e8afcbf6-c112-40c4-9504-82830b005a53.png">
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
fa18553d382a7d8c447cd6698b36e293fb7ecf1f fuzz: Remove addrdb fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The target has several issues:
* It is named incorrectly (`addrdb`, but it constructs a `CBanEntry`)
* It doesn't do anything meaningful, other than consuming one integer and passing it to a constructor
* It consumes CPU time that can be used for the other targets
* It is redundant with the banman fuzz target
Fix all by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK fa18553d382a7d8c447cd6698b36e293fb7ecf1f, thanks for the cleanup
Tree-SHA512: 3f8944d3f80913bf466c03062fed070e96073fb72d0938b2bc9a2586960c86879d6f251e16fd81cfeb4e6685ff9eef6bccb25cd3901b218a100c90f25a3c9240
14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee [consensus] MOVEONLY: Move single-sig checking EvalScript code to EvalChecksig (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is another small refactor pulled out of the Schnorr/Taproot PR #17977.
This is in preparation for adding different signature verification rules,
specifically tapscript (BIP 342), which interprets opcode 0xac and 0xad
as Schnorr signature verifications.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, verified move-only.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, reviewed with "git show 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space -W" 👆
fjahr:
Code-review ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, verified that it's move-only.
instagibbs:
code review ACK 14e8cf974a, verified move-only
theStack:
Code-Review ACK 14e8cf974a
jonatack:
ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee
Tree-SHA512: af2efce9ae39d5ec01db5b9ef0ff383fe252ef5f33b3483927308ae17d91a619266cb45951f32ea1ce54807a4c0f052bcdefb47e244465d3a726393221c227b1
13076867981ab36b3549ab4c29583ae8ed12a709 refactor: Use Mutex type for g_cs_recent_confirmed_transactions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
No need the `RecursiveMutex` type for the `g_cs_recent_confirmed_transactions`.
Related to #19303.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 13076867981ab36b3549ab4c29583ae8ed12a709
vasild:
ACK 13076867
Tree-SHA512: 67f1be10c80ec18d0f80b9f5036e5a20986314da9b9364ef4e193ad1d9f3f4c8e4c2e16253ca79d649ff602d5b8c2aff58d7dd1085841afb760479a4875cffbe
37ae687f95c82f2d64ed880533d158060d4fc3de Add tests for CPubKey serialization/unserialization (Elichai Turkel)
9b8907faded8e4ec312c0dd4b4b15e1793876acd Check size after Unserializing CPubKey (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
Found by practicalswift, closes#19235
Currently all the public API(except the pointer-like API) in CPubKey that sets/constructs a pubkey goes through `CPubKey::Set` which checks if that the length and size match and if not invalidates the key.
This adds the same check to `CPubKey::Unserialize`, sadly I don't see an easy way to just push this to the existing checks in `CPubKey::Set` but it's only a simple condition.
The problem with not invalidating is that if you write a pubkey like: `{0x02,0x00}` it will think the actual length is 33(because of `size()`) and will access uninitialized memory if you call any of the functions on CPubKey.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK 37ae687f95c82f2d64ed880533d158060d4fc3de
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 37ae687 per `git diff eab8ee3 37ae687` only change since last review at eab8ee3 is passing the `pubkey` param by reference to const instead of by value in `src/test/key_tests.cpp::CmpSerializationPubkey`
MarcoFalke:
ACK 37ae687f95c82f2d64ed880533d158060d4fc3de
Tree-SHA512: 30173755555dfc76d6263fb6a59f41be36049ffae7b4e1b92b922d668f5e5e2331f7374d5fa10d5d59fc53020d2966156905ffcfa8b8129c1f6d0ca062174ff1
132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f doc: Mention the flat directory structure for uploads (Andrew Chow)
fb17c99e35e72f3b21ec3b5473e84c21dc964776 guix: Don't include directory name in SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The SHA256SUMS file can be used in a sha256sum -c command to verify downloaded binaries. However users are likely to download just a single file and not place this file in the correct directory relative to the SHA256SUMS file for the simple verification command to work. By not including the directory name in the SHA256SUMS file, it will be easier for users to verify downloaded binaries.
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f
fanquake:
ACK 132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f
Tree-SHA512: c9ff416b8dfb2f3ceaf4d63afb84aac9fcaefbbf9092f9e095061b472884ec92c7a809e6530c7132a82cfe3ab115a7328e47994a412072e1d4feb26fc502c8c5
90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a release: Release with separate SHA256SUMS and sig files (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This allows us to:
- remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks, and
- release with a SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a
Tree-SHA512: 5d5086063d303aa0cbd590e5fdf2ae8f555e25f4e43bf67545e33384449b990e94834c711622530ad0eb3dcc83f52746884a5081dadb0acff8dd799cfadafac7
a884a1edcd1b795799f1be65df17462041741dc3 guix/INSTALL: Misc fixups (Carl Dong)
3c4d2c418e62d421a8bd7640ef5384251c892406 guix: Silence getent(1) invocation (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Otherwise the `getent(1)` checks will print out the default http, https, and ftp ports, making it seem like something is being spawned that is listening on those ports, which is not the case.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a884a1edcd1b795799f1be65df17462041741dc3
Tree-SHA512: 7706a98fe5f2bcd766fd3a16bfffab899ec45e80d72c485b7bed2a83d2024eddbb44ae4a77e2352e308740ca203c163421a11a5a2327fa94d2032ecceef4d63f
