## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bitcoin#15639 removes libbitcoin-server library from list of wallet
linkage list.
It is not possible to remove this dependency in dash now because
coinjoin hardly used libbitcoin-server in client side.
Despite that, this dependency can be removed.
## What was done?
Removed NodeContext from dummyWallet by providing nullptr as a chain
pointer.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Validated, that linkage error "NodeContext is unknown symbol"
disappeared in case if remove libbitcoin-server dependency.
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
deaa6dd144f5650b385658a0c4f9a014aff8dde2 psbt: check output index is within bounds before accessing (Andrew Chow)
f1ef7f0aa46338f4cd8de79696027a1bf868f359 Don't calculate tx fees for PSBTs with invalid money values (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17149
Two classes of issues were found by the psbt fuzzer: values out of range and causing overflows, and prevout indexes being out of range. This PR fixes both.
When accessing a specific output using the index given in the tx, check that it is actually a possible output before trying to access the output.
When summing and checking amounts for `decodepsbt` and `analyzepsbt`, make sure that the values are actually valid money values.. Otherwise, stop summing and don't show the fee. For `analyzepsbt`, return that the next role is the Creator since the Creator needs to remake the transaction to be valid.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK deaa6dd144f5650b385658a0c4f9a014aff8dde2 -- only change since last ACK was the addition of tests
gwillen:
tested ACK deaa6dd, would also like to see this merged!
Tree-SHA512: 06c36720bbb5a7ab1c29f7d15878bf9f0d3e5760c06bff479d412e1bf07bb3e0e9ab6cca820a4bfedaab71bfd7af813807e87cbcdf0af25cc3f66a53a06dbcfd
c6dd565c8820aa8a98b190621e10c6e2821a9ecc [gui] watch-only wallet: copy PSBT to clipboard (Sjors Provoost)
39465d545d521e66bb3accfa788aa94bffaf47eb [wallet] add fillPSBT to interface (Sjors Provoost)
848f88920853724511387ca0b7ef652fa14ced71 [gui] send: include watch-only (Sjors Provoost)
40537f090907f81ba885edb7dff1558382976912 [wallet] ListCoins: include watch-only for wallets without private keys (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
For wallets with `WALLET_FLAG_DISABLE_PRIVATE_KEYS` this makes the watch-only balance available on the send screen (including coin selection). Instead of sending a transaction it generates a PSBT.
The user can take this PSBT and process it with [HWI](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI) or put it an SD card for hardware wallets that support that.
The PSBT is copied to the clipboard. This was the easiest approach; we can add a dialog later to display it, as well as an option to save to disk.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
test and code review ACK c6dd565c88
meshcollider:
re-ACK c6dd565c8820aa8a98b190621e10c6e2821a9ecc
Tree-SHA512: ebc3da0737e33b255ed926191b84569aedb6097d14868662bd5dce726ce3048e86e9a31eba987b10dffe1482b35c21ae1cd595c2caa4634bc4cf78a826a83852
27ee53c1ae wallet: Add error handling. Check return value of ParseUInt32(...) in ParseHDKeypath(...). (practicalswift)
7223263899 wallet: Add tests for ParseHDKeypath(...) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add error handling. Check return value of `ParseUInt32(...)` in `ParseHDKeypath(...)`.
`ParseUInt32(...)` returns `false` if the entire string could not be parsed or when an overflow or underflow occurred. In such case the uninitialized variable `number` would be used in the calculation of `path` (prior to this commit).
An example key path triggering this is `m/0/4294967296`:
```
ParseHDKeypath("m/0/4294967296", keypath);
```
`4294967296` is `1` + `0xFFFFFFFF` (`uint32_t` max: `4294967295`).
Introduced in a4b06fb42eb0ad94e562ca839391b57e69285136 which was merged into `master` 14 hours ago as part of #13557 ("BIP 174 PSBT Serializations and RPCs").
Tree-SHA512: e5ff423f67c18d82c1231bde6343587a453e793c32004d93dc9b61be6d9372b57a6b2c9978d9eb1000d6cc82fd180f2486013f928dca737fb92daad22c16e467
It become a visible UB (crash) after backport bitcoin#19848
## What was done?
Increased life-term for object under reference
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests with and without bitcoin#19848
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a Ignoring (but warn) on duplicate -wallet parameters (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
I expect that there are many users with load on startup wallet definitions in `bitcoin.conf` or via startup CLI argument.
With the new `settings.json` r/w configuration file, users unloading and loading a wallet through the GUI or via the RPC calls might end up with a duplicate `-wallet` entry (one that still remains in bitcoin.conf or CLI) plus the new duplication in `settings.json` due to the unload/load.
Steps to reproduce
* create wallet (if via RPC set `load_on_startup` or unloadwallet/loadwallet then set `load_on_startup`).
* stop bitcoin
* start bitcoind again with same `--wallet=mywallet`
I guess it is acceptable to skip duplicates.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Tested ACK 58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a. Changes since previous review: rebased, tweaked warning message, squashed/fixed test
Tree-SHA512: f94e5a999bdd7dc291f0bc142911b0a8033929350d6f6a35b58c4a06a3c8f83147be0f0c402d4e946dedbbcc85b7e023b672c731b6d7a8984d4780017c961cfb
8b39a875581bed1c2f40a7d9616bdb7cc642bf59 bugfix: make LoadWallet assigns status always (Akio Nakamura)
Pull request description:
In my enviroment, ```test/functional/wallet_multiwallet.py``` failed in line 237 for master( 147d50d63 ).
It got an expected rpc-error-message, but error code was not (-4) but (-18).
This is because that although loadwallet() in rpcwallet.cpp assumes LoadWallet() always assign some value to the 'status', but LoadWallet() does not do so in some situation.
This PR intends to fix above and prevends loadwallet() returns ambiguous error code.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 8b39a875581bed1c2f40a7d9616bdb7cc642bf59, that is the same as 1728059730abef04f3fa84de0b6e20044be7a9d6.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8b39a875581bed1c2f40a7d9616bdb7cc642bf59 (same as previous)
meshcollider:
utACK 8b39a875581bed1c2f40a7d9616bdb7cc642bf59
Tree-SHA512: a75d8240f60325bfdb69a07d392269fec97de743f38fe108371eb63a0aba5d8ce3cc484ecc69e81febf8040f5ab64f3a9450b98f8e07a0c17803784bb6f342bf
6e0d82c55bf4a9aae98c47b7cd00b2828b5dd0ee rpc: remove unused getbalances() code (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This line from 999931cf8f1 appears to be extraneous and replaced 2 lines after by `UniValue balances{UniValue::VOBJ};`.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
ACK 6e0d82c55b
hebasto:
ACK 6e0d82c55bf4a9aae98c47b7cd00b2828b5dd0ee, the `obj` local variable is not used until the end of the scope.
Tree-SHA512: a220ca9cda091e78144d9b7fbe4bf90e8338d6e8c8dc7bea27a8e62f3a8ac1d983ad12a48a0a3366b2d8b9586878dfc69c1ec34bf846b34c91e42cda48a59850
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
autoresending was really slow
## What was done?
reduced the time range to from 1-3 hours from now
## How Has This Been Tested?
hasn't
## Breaking Changes
Shouldn't be
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
b35e74ba379bdc12ea6d49a45469f0d6aa74cc27 wallet, refactor: Remove duplicate map lookups in GetAddressBalances (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Now just one lookup in `balances` instead of three.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b35e74ba379bdc12ea6d49a45469f0d6aa74cc27
theStack:
ACK b35e74ba379bdc12ea6d49a45469f0d6aa74cc27
practicalswift:
ACK b35e74ba379bdc12ea6d49a45469f0d6aa74cc27
Tree-SHA512: a73c1b336406a569e3bb10290618c5950b944db58ed0b05ff202d097684bb3ba3a5942c8d30443960052aa16438c054e2d02977b67aa901cce665c4df0ee5602
09502452bbbe21bb974f1de8cf53196373921ab9 IsUsedDestination should count any known single-key address (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
This plugs the privacy leak detailed at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17605, at least for the single-key case.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code Review ACK 09502452bbbe21bb974f1de8cf53196373921ab9
Tree-SHA512: e1d68281675f05072b3087171cba1df9416a69c9ccf70c72e8555e55eadda2d0fd339e5a894e3a3438ff94b9e3827fb19b8b701faade70c08756b19ff157ee0c
6e77a7b65cda1b46ce42f0c99ca91562255aeb28 keypool: Add comment about TopUp and when to use it (Andrew Chow)
ea50e34b287e0da0806c1116bb55ade730e8ff6c keypool: Move opportunistic TopUps from LegacyScriptPubKeyMan to CWallet and ReserveDestination (Andrew Chow)
bb2c8ce23c9d7ba8d0e5538243e07218443c85b4 keypool: Remove superfluous topup from CWallet::GetNewChangeDestination (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
* The `TopUp()` in `CWallet::GetNewChangeDestination` is unnecessary as currently m_spk_man calls TopUp further down the call stack inside LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::ReserveKeyFromKeyPool (called by LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::GetReservedDestination). This also lets us prepare for future changes with multiple ScriptPubKeyMans in the wallet.
* An opportunistic `TopUp()` is moved from `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::GetNewDestination` to `CWallet::GetNewDestination`.
* Another opportunistic `TopUp()` is moved from `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::ReserveKeyFromKeyPool`
Moving opportunistic TopUps ensures that ScriptPubKeyMans will always be topped up before requesting Destinations from them as we cannot always rely on future ScriptPubKeyMan implementaions topping up internally.
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17373#discussion_r348598174
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 6e77a7b65c only change is slight elaboration on comment
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 6e77a7b65cda1b46ce42f0c99ca91562255aeb28. Only the comment changed since my previous review.
Tree-SHA512: bdfc8d303842c3fb7c3d40af7abfa6d9dac4ef71a24922bb92229674ee89bfe3113ebb46d3903ac48ef99f0a7d6eaac33282495844f2b31f91b8df55084c421f
7cecf10ac32af0fca206ac5f24f482bdec88cb7d Replace LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::IsCrypted with LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::HasEncryptionKeys (Andrew Chow)
bf6417142f36a2f75b3a11368bd73fe788ae1ccb Remove SetCrypted() and fUseCrypto; Change IsCrypted()'s implementation (Andrew Chow)
77a777118eaf78f10a439810d1c08d510a539aa0 Rename EncryptKeys to Encrypt and pass in the encrypted batch to use (Andrew Chow)
35f962fcf0d5107ae6a3a9348e249a9b18ff7106 Clear mapKeys before encrypting (Andrew Chow)
14b5efd66ff0afbf3bf9158a724534a9090fc7fc Move fDecryptionThoroughlyChecked from CWallet to LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
97c0374a46943b2ed38ea24eeeff1f1568dd55b3 Move Unlock implementation to LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
e576b135d6451101d6a8219f55d80aefa216dc38 Replace LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::vMasterKey with GetDecryptionKey() (Andrew Chow)
fd9d6eebc1eabb4675a118d19d38283da2dead39 Add GetEncryptionKey() and HasEncryptionKeys() to WalletStorage (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Let wallet class handle locked/unlocked status and master key, and let keyman
handle encrypting its data and determining whether there is encrypted data.
There should be no change in behavior, but state is tracked differently. The
fUseCrypto atomic bool is eliminated and replaced with equivalent
HasEncryptionKeys checks.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7cecf10
Tree-SHA512: 95a997c366ca539abba0c0a7a0015f39d27b55220683d8d86344ff2d926db4724da67700d2c8ec2d82ed75d07404318c6cb81544af8aadeefab312167257e673
886f1731bec4393dd342403ac34069a3a4f95eea Key pool: Fix omitted pre-split count in GetKeyPoolSize (Andrew Chow)
386a994b853bc5b3a2ed0d812673465b8ffa4849 Key pool: Change ReturnDestination interface to take address instead of key (Andrew Chow)
ba41aa4969169cd73d6b4f57444ed7d8d875de10 Key pool: Move LearnRelated and GetDestination calls (Andrew Chow)
65833a74076cddf986037c6eb3b29a9b9dbe31c5 Add OutputType and CPubKey parameters to KeepDestination (Andrew Chow)
9fcf8ce7ae02bf170b9bf0c2887fd709d752cbf7 Rename Keep/ReturnKey to Keep/ReturnDestination and remove the wrapper (Andrew Chow)
596f6460f9fd8273665c8754ccd673d93a4f25f0 Key pool: Move CanGetAddresses call (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
* The `pwallet->CanGetAddresses()` call in `ReserveDestination::GetReservedDestination` to `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::GetReservedDestination` so that the sanity check results in a failure when a `ScriptPubKeyMan` individually cannot get a destination, not when any of the `ScriptPubKeyMan`s can't.
* `ScriptPubKeyMan::GetReservedDestination` is changed to return the destination so that future `ScriptPubKeyMan`s can return destinations constructed in other ways. This is implemented for `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` by moving key-to-destination code from `CWallet` to `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan`
* In order for `ScriptPubKeyMan` to be generic and work with future `ScriptPubKeyMan`s, `ScriptPubKeyMan::ReturnDestination` is changed to take a `CTxDestination` instead of a `CPubKey`. Since `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` still deals with keys internally, a new map `m_reserved_key_to_index` is added in order to track the keypool indexes that have been reserved.
* A bug is fixed in how the total keypool size is calculated as it was omitting `set_pre_split_keypool` which is a bug.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 886f1731bec4393dd342403ac34069a3a4f95eea. Only change is moving earlier fix to a better commit (same end result).
promag:
Code review ACK 886f1731bec4393dd342403ac34069a3a4f95eea.
instagibbs:
code review re-ACK 886f1731be
Sjors:
Code review re-ACK 886f1731bec4393dd342403ac34069a3a4f95eea
Tree-SHA512: f4be290759f63fdc920d5c02bd0d09acc4b06a5f053787d4afcd3c921b2e35d2bd97617fadae015da853dc189f559fb8d2c6e58d53e4cabfac9af151cd97ad19
1a3a256d5e0443d19757c1f1fceb9c9ede17758a wallet: replace raw pointer with const reference in AddrToPubKey (Harris)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces a redundant reference-to-pointer conversion in **addmultisigaddress** from *wallet/rpcwallet.cpp*. It also makes the API from *rpc/util.h* look more straightforward as **AddrToPubKey** now uses const references like other functions from there.
I am not sure why there is a ref-to-ptr conversion in addmultisignatures, so I can only speculate that this is because of "historical reasons".
The ref-to-ptr conversion happens here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp#L1001
There, the address of LegacyScriptPubKeyMan& is given to AddrToPubKey.
Later, in AddrToPubKey, it gets converted back to a reference, because GetKeyForDestination in rpc/util.cpp expects a const ref: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/rpc/util.cpp#L140
Regards,
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1a3a256d5e0443d19757c1f1fceb9c9ede17758a
meshcollider:
utACK 1a3a256d5e0443d19757c1f1fceb9c9ede17758a
promag:
Code review ACK 1a3a256d5e0443d19757c1f1fceb9c9ede17758a.
hebasto:
ACK 1a3a256d5e0443d19757c1f1fceb9c9ede17758a, I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 1a2b8ddab5694ef4c65fac69f011e38dd03a634e84a35857e13bd05ad99fe42af22ee0af6230865e3d2c725693512f3336acb055ede19c958424283e7a3856c4
3958295bc8a3787b66b0269190218a3764088f79 wallet: LearnRelatedScripts only if KeepDestination (João Barbosa)
55295fba4cbff36e9a8c3fed9c38e82ebe3c48b7 wallet: Lock address type in ReserveDestination (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Only mutates the wallet if the reserved key is kept.
First commit is a refactor that makes the address type a class member.
The second commit moves `LearnRelatedScripts` from `GetReservedDestination` to `KeepDestination` to avoid an unnecessary call to `AddCScript` - which in turn prevents multiple entries of the same script in the wallet DB.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Re-ACK 3958295bc8a3787b66b0269190218a3764088f79
Sjors:
ACK 3958295bc8a3787b66b0269190218a3764088f79
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3958295bc8a3787b66b0269190218a3764088f79. I like this change. The new behavior makes more sense, and the change makes the code clearer, since the current LearnRelatedScripts call is hard to understand and explain. (Personally, I'd like it if this PR were merged before #17373 or that PR was rebased on top of this one so it would be less confusing.)
meshcollider:
utACK 3958295bc8a3787b66b0269190218a3764088f79
Tree-SHA512: 49a5f4b022b28042ad37ea309b28378a3983cb904e234a25795b5a360356652e0f8e60f15e3e64d85094ea63af9be01812d90ccfc08ca4f1dd927fdd8566e33f
d0dab897afaac0a18aa47d3ce673a4a43a69178a Refactor: Require scriptPubKey to get wallet SigningProvider (Andrew Chow)
4b0c718f8f48c678cbe4575e9a9cf9e62a30f0da Accumulate result UniValue in SignTransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Easier to review ignoring whitespace:
git log -p -n1 -w
This commit does not change behavior. It passes new CScript arguments to
signing functions, but the arguments aren't currently used.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK d0dab897af
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0dab897afaac0a18aa47d3ce673a4a43a69178a. Thanks for the SignTransaction update. No other changes since last review
Sjors:
Code review ACK d0dab897afaac0a18aa47d3ce673a4a43a69178a
promag:
Code review ACK d0dab897afaac0a18aa47d3ce673a4a43a69178a.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK d0dab897afaac0a18aa47d3ce673a4a43a69178a
Tree-SHA512: c3f52df20fd9d6b3b5aa65562cf5f7dce7b7f44c148b0f988f8b578fce2a28e9b7bf010f5f04bb5bf60f5272b2899f1dbbfb8aee81579c21c9cba559d1d2bb70
0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8 wallet: Reuse existing batch in CWallet::SetUsedDestinationState (João Barbosa)
01f45dd00eb032a19d142026e4d019944192da19 wallet: Avoid recursive lock in CWallet::SetUsedDestinationState (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR makes 2 distinct changes around `CWallet::SetUsedDestinationState`:
- 1st the recursive lock is removed and now it requires the lock to be held;
- 2nd change is to support, in the best case, just a wallet database flush when transaction is added to the wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0b75a7f0680d16a41043864a897470324917b1e8. Code changes looks fine but PR description should be updated to say what benefits of the change are. I might have missed something, but I didn't see a place where multiple batches were used previously and a single batch was used now. So the main benefit of this change appears to be removing a recursive lock? And maybe moving toward a consistent convention for passing batch instances?
Tree-SHA512: abcf23a5850d29990668db20d6f624cca3e89629cc9ed003e0d05cde1b58ab2ff365034f156684ad13e55764b54c6c0c2bc7d5f96b8af7dc5e45a3be955d6b15
8a2a652e6fab5eb8224beefcc07d9011b61865a8 Remove redundant type information from rpc docs (David O'Callaghan)
Pull request description:
Simple edit of the RPC calls to remove redundant text ("A json object/array ...") from the beginning of help.
Fixes: #18258
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: cbbf760e0b7b4eda61c40b420ed77f5d878318e37b0eb13e63567212240b2c4ecc15d84030e98075e21c9ae9016539adfd201e5661ea824166a76d335180c32f
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
minimizing global uses
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Started the deglobalization, a future PR should be done to continue this
deglobalization
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
none
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Fix for the `importelectrumwallet` issue report in #5106
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Check the `private_key` field for prefixes set off by ":" when
processing electrum CSV/JSON backup files.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
Tested locally by importing a backup modified to include both styles of
private key formatting
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
None 🤞
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678 scripted-diff: Wallet: Rename incorrectly named *UsedDestination (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
These functions are used to mark/check if a key of our own has been used to spend (and only for avoid-reuse wallets), which has nothing to do with the destination/address itself.
Give them more accurate names to avoid confusion.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/UsedDestination/SpentKey/g' $(git grep -l 'UsedDestination' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678 -- patch looks correct and rationale makes sense
instagibbs:
ACK bca8665d08, much more meaningful name, thanks
kallewoof:
ACK bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678
Tree-SHA512: ff13d9061ffa748e92eb41ba962c3ec262a43e4b6abd62408b38c6f650395d6ae5851554257d1900fb02767a88d08380d592a27210192ee9abb72d0945976686
71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff379131a01e4e9f9648b150e806104a23795 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e20f881c843a9219e48cec202e962f8 wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
