dcda81c47101196e53e379d965a2692515ef8363 test: add coverage for script parse error in ParseScript (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
Follow up on this suggestion : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18416#issuecomment-603966799
This adds a test case to raise the `script parse error` in `ParseScript`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK dcda81c471
Tree-SHA512: ae0ef2c00f34cee818c83582f190d5f4043159e922862f2b442b7b895b8ff3ca421533699247c12c367be77813b5205830a771cd47a18e8932807ccace2d6a1c
9c5af58d51 Consolidate redundant implementations of ParseHashStr (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This change:
* adds a length check to all calls to `ParseHashStr`, appropriate given its use to populate
a 256-bit number from a hex str
* allows the caller to handle the failure, which allows for the more
appropriate `JSONRPCError` on failure in `prioritisetransaction` rpc
Relative to #14288
Tree-SHA512: baa791147e5ceb3c30c70df3981aaf807bf7d4a90a0be3625540b59aa4b9a9d303a452bfef18bf167cbb833ef9591b4ef5948bf4a1ce67b421d804ae8d20ea53
57889e688dd0987a1e087cd48d216a413127601e bitcoin-tx: Stricter check for valid integers (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
Just calling `atoi` to convert strings to integers does not check for valid integers very thoroughly; in particular, it just ignores everything starting from the first non-numeral character. Even a string like "foo" is fine and silently returns 0.
This meant that `bitcoin-tx` would not fail if such a string was passed in various places where an integer is expected (like the `locktime` or an input/output index); this means that it would, for instance, silently accept a typo and interpret it in an unexpected way.
In this change, we use `ParseInt64` for parsing strings to integers, which actually verifies that the full string is valid as number. New tests in the `bitcoin-util-test` cover the new error paths.
This fixes#13599.
Tree-SHA512: 146a0af275e9f57784e5d0582d3defbac35551b54b6b7232f8a0b20db04aa611125e52aa4512ef2f8ed2cafc2a12fe586f9d10ed66d641cff090288f279b1988
