fa4074b395a47c54069bd9f598244701505ff11d Show name, format and if uses descriptors in bitcoin-wallet tool (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK fa4074b395a47c54069bd9f598244701505ff11d
jonatack:
re-ACK fa4074b395a47c54069bd9f598244701505ff11d
Tree-SHA512: cf6ee96ff21532fc4b0ba7a0fdfdc1fa485c9b1495447350fe65cd0bd919e0e0280613933265cdee069b8c29ccf015ac374535a70cac3d4fb89f4d08b3a03519
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
HD wallets are old-existsing feature, appeared in Dash years ago, but
enabling HD wallets is not trivial task that requires multiple steps and
command line/rpc calls.
Let's have them enabled by default.
## What was done?
- HD wallets are enabled by default. Currently behavior `dashd`,
`dash-qt` are similar to run with option `-usehd=1`
- the rpc `upgradewallet` do not let to upgrade from non-HD wallet to HD
wallet to don't encourage user use non-crypted wallets (postponed till
v21)
- the initialization of ScriptPubKey is updated to be sure that encypted
HD seed is never written on disk (if passphrase is provided)
- enabled and dashified a script `wallet_upgradewallet.py` which test
compatibility between different versions of wallet
## What is not done?
- wallet tool still does not support passhprase, HD seed can appear on
disk
- there's no dialog that show user a mnemonic phrase and encourage him
to make a paper backup
Before removing a command line 'usehd' (backport bitcoin#11250) need to
make at least one major release for fail-over option (if someone wish to
use non-HD wallets only).
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests.
Enabled new functional test `wallet_upgradewallet.py` that has been
backported long time ago but waited this PR to be enabled.
## Breaking Changes
HD wallets are created by default.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Given the hard fork that happened on testnet, there is now lots of the
transactions that were made on the fork that is no longer valid. Some
transactions could be relayed and mined again but some like coinjoin
mixing won't be relayed because of 0 fee and transactions spending
coinbases from the forked branch are no longer valid at all.
## What was done?
Introduce `wipewallettxes` RPC and `wipetxes` command for `dash-wallet`
tool to be able to get rid of some/all txes in the wallet.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, use rpc/command on testnet wallet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Simply avoiding the hardcoded string in more places for consistency.
It can also allow for more easily reusing tests for other chains other than regtest.
Separated from #8994 .
Continues #16509 .
It is still not complete (ie to be complete, we need the -chain parameter in #16680 and make whether acceptnonstdtxs is allowed for that chain or not customizable for regtest [or for custom chains like in #8994 ] ). But while being incomplete like #16509 , it's quite simple to review and another step forward IMO.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 1abcecc. I think it's an improvement even if incomplete and if some PR's might accidentally bring "regtest" back. Subsequent improvements hopefully don't have to touch 16 files.
elichai:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
Tree-SHA512: 5620de6dab235ca8bd8670d6366c7b9f04f0e3ca9c5e7f87765b38e16ed80c17d7d1630c0d5fd7c5526f070830d94dc74cc2096d8ede87dc7180ed20569509ee
a67352161c68fea9764cc31aff199f112d8572c6 test: skip tool_wallet test when bitcoin-wallet isn't compiled (fanquake)
e9277baed64e1d4054a102e40b39a9aed7839c2f test: skip wallet_listreceivedby test when the cli isn't compiled (fanquake)
621d398750d9f5ce3e7ec75ccb160b3534dcc436 test: skip bitcoin_cli test when the cli isn't compiled (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Don't try and run the `interface_bitcoin_cli.py` test when `bitcoin-cli` isn't available.
```bash
stdout:
2019-11-17T01:51:41.623000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /var/folders/z2/cn877pxd3czdfh47mfkmbwgm0000gn/T/test_runner_₿_🏃_20191116_205141/interface_bitcoin_cli_0
2019-11-17T01:51:41.890000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during testing
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 111, in main
self.run_test()
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py", line 18, in run_test
cli_response = self.nodes[0].cli("-version").send_cli()
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 528, in send_cli
process = subprocess.Popen(p_args, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, universal_newlines=True)
File "/Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in __init__
restore_signals, start_new_session)
File "/Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1289, in _execute_child
raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/src/bitcoin-cli'
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: de27513a615d9d21271a0948e012c3209351e7374efd19bfa1bb9cda77e8fffe15d99e3424e4dbfa8cf826084f8af1670726f4703bd2b6093e7d37df4bea64f0
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
3c3e31c3a4 [tests] Add wallet-tool test (João Barbosa)
49d2374acf [tools] Add wallet inspection and modification tool (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Adds an offline tool `bitcoin-wallet-tool` for wallet creation and maintenance.
Currently this tool can create a new wallet file, display information on an existing wallet, and run the salvage and zapwallettxes maintenance tasks on an existing wallet. It can later be extended to support other common wallet maintenance tasks.
Doing wallet maintenance tasks in an offline tool makes much more sense (and is potentially safer) than having to spin up a full node.
Tree-SHA512: 75a28b8a58858d9d76c7532db40eacdefc5714ea5aab536fb1dc9756e2f7d750d69d68d59c50a68e633ce38fb5b8c3e3d4880db30fe01561e07ce58d42bceb2b
