They run multiprocess build for ALL PRs in travis since that commit
```diff
- if: type != pull_request OR commit_message =~ /depends:|multiprocess:/ # Skip on non-depends, non-multiprocess PRs
```
There's no actual multiprocess code yet, that's just part related to build system.
To test build add an option --enable-multiprocess to configure
So far as there's no real multiprocessing yet, let's save CPU money - last commit in this PR disables gitlab's CI temporary
e2bab2aa162ae38b2bf8195b577c982402fbee9d multiprocess: add multiprocess travis configuration (Russell Yanofsky)
603fd6a2e708c04ef6c9880f89d0a4cbaa6fc7c5 depends: add MULTIPROCESS depends option (Russell Yanofsky)
5d1377b52bfcd4edf8553aaf332bfeb92fc554cc build: multiprocess autotools changes (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
This PR consists of build changes only. It adds an `--enable-multiprocess` autoconf option (off by default and marked experimental), that builds new `bitcoin-node` and `bitcoin-gui` binaries. These currently function the same as existing `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` binaries, but are extended in #10102 with IPC features to execute node, wallet, and gui functions in separate processes.
In addition to adding the `--enable-multiprocess` config flag, it also adds a depends package and autoconf rules to build with the [libmultiprocess](https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess) library, and it adds new travis configuration to exercise the build code and run functional tests with the new binaries.
The changes in this PR were originally part of #10102 but were moved into #16367 to be able to develop and review the multiprocess build changes independently of the code changes. #16367 was briefly merged and then reverted in #18588. Only change since #16367 has been dropping the `native_boost.mk` depends package which was pointed out to be no longer necessary in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16367#issuecomment-596484337 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18588#pullrequestreview-391765649
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK e2bab2aa162ae38b2bf8195b577c982402fbee9d
Sjors:
tACK e2bab2aa162ae38b2bf8195b577c982402fbee9d on macOS 10.15.4
hebasto:
ACK e2bab2aa162ae38b2bf8195b577c982402fbee9d, tested on Linux Mint 19.3 (x86_64):
Tree-SHA512: b5a76eab5abf63d9d8b6d628cbdff4cc1888eef15cafa0a5d56369e2f9d02595fed623f4b74b2cf2830c42c05a774f0943e700f9c768a82d9d348cad199e135c
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Make CI builds faster.
We have this
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/ci/dash/build_src.sh#L18
but by that time `CCACHE_SIZE` is set to 100M via
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/ci/test/00_setup_env.sh#L51
already.
## What was done?
set `CCACHE_SIZE` variable in `.gitlab-ci.yml`, drop confusing and
useless lines from `ci/dash/build_src.sh` (`CCACHE_SIZE` and
`CCACHE_COMPRESS` defaults are handled by `ci/test/00_setup_env.sh`)
## How Has This Been Tested?
I set `CCACHE_SIZE` to 400M yesterday via Gitlab UI to test it.
results:
before, trivial doc change, 100M:
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4931233566#L59 (~17 minutes)
after, trivial code change, 400M:
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4935764148#L80 (~12 minutes)
Removed it from Gitlab UI now but it should still say `Set cache size
limit to 400.0 MB` in logs for this PR.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
fa082d0a57afedca9122fac4aecd6a3070f06b04 travis: Remove valgrind (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When the valgrind run was added, it took 2 hours. Travis kindly raised the timeout limit to the maximum possible of 3 hours.
Today, a full build of Bitcoin Core with all tests takes more than three hours. Thus, it is impossible to run all tests on travis.
Moreover, the feedback loop for developers that create a pull request takes at least 2 hours, but in some cases (when the travis queue is full) until the next day. This is unacceptable.
Fix both issues by removing the build from travis.
Please note that the `ci/test/` configurations are *not* removed. They will stay in the repo and can be executed anywhere (just not on travis).
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa082d0a57
jnewbery:
utACK fa082d0a57afedca9122fac4aecd6a3070f06b04
Tree-SHA512: 9acaa0e2d3926014fadb7dd2e86c4e01df382e9399f6ae99f989fa609da66a77bdd1b75d6ff42d2686f38f730b8564e6dc722aa597a473290c9d30c2abe7ef0f
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We should not be running jobs if their ancestors failed. This was broken
with the introduction of `FAST_MODE`/`.skip-in-fast-mode-template` I
think (via #3635).
## What was done?
Adjust ci rules, make them explicit.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Compare `test` stages:
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/pipelines/888510672 (note: some of
`test` stage jobs were started, even though all related jobs from
`build` stage have failed)
vs
https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/888923382 (note: none of
`test` stage jobs were started)
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
CI should not be running that many jobs in "FAST_MODE"
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/.gitlab-ci.yml#L5
## What was done?
assign `.skip-in-fast-mode-template` template to more jobs
## How Has This Been Tested?
ran CI in my repo
before: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/832175740
after: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/832176325
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Make fMixing atomic as it has concurrent access
Add tsan suppression for zmq namespace
Suppress deadlock false positive in ConnectTip
Switch ubsan target to linux32
Add new test job for linux64_cxx17 target without any sanitizers
Increase rpc time out for block reward reallocation test
Fix heap use after free in CConnman::GetExtraOutboundCount()
Different builds for linux32 and linux64 tsan and ubsan
Increase timeout for llmq_signing functional test
fa193dc8e6f3b96fa2dba2f1c1668f7720fed320 doc: Remove win32 from the release process (MarcoFalke)
faf666f8148eeb305a9c4f78459aff2c7268016b Remove Windows 32 bit build (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The Windows 32 bit build has been removed from https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, so unless there are complaints, we don't need to build it even
ACKs for commit fa193d:
fanquake:
utACK fa193dc8e6
Tree-SHA512: d6f2976a2e0c407698f720b00ac23ec4056626de4eff8621f4c5581120af0460afd1bdef72329cc0e7d92afca48d94ae5fce6777cb36bfabb60b8034ff08fd88
3828a79711 scripted-diff: prefer MAC_OSX over __APPLE__ (fanquake)
fa6e841e89 gui: remove macOS ProgressBar workaround (fanquake)
68c272527f gui: remove SubstituteFonts (fanquake)
6c6dbd8af5 doc: mention that macOS 10.10 is now required (fanquake)
84b0cfa8b6 release: bump minimum required macOS to 10.10 (fanquake)
26b15df99d depends: set OSX_MIN_VERSION to 10.10 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Closes#13362
d99abfddb0c8f2111340a6127e77cc686e0043d8
This workaround should no longer be required, as it should have only been in use when compiled with the 10.7 SDK, which we haven't been building with for a while now.
5bc5ae30982a0f0f6a9804b05d99434af770c724
The bugreport linked with this code is for an unrelated? issue, however from what I can tell the correct QTBUG is this one https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-20880. Reading though the discussion there, it seems that the way progress bars are animated changed in macOS 10.10.
Qt was patched [here (5.5+)](https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/112379/):
> Disable progress bar animations on 10.10 Yosemite and higher - the native style does not animate them any more. Keep the indeterminate progress bar animation.
Given all of that, I don't think this is worth keeping around, as it would seem to only be useful in the case that a macOS user is compiling with a Qt < 5.5. That should be pretty unlikely, as we don't support downloaded Qt binaries, and brew currently provides [5.11.1](571b46213c/Formula/qt.rb).
Tree-SHA512: 4278cb30cc9bcb313e166129ecf032c808995f8b51a3123637c47860a0010ac88f86f82ec44792153b6b1e5cca595f25013b2eaeae80194647b9ce4f7eaf32c1
* Introduce FAST_MODE Gitlab variable
Default: "false". When "true", only run linter on arm and unit/functional tests on linux64, skip everything else.
* fix ordering I accidentially somehow changed
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* remove x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention
5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.
Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80
* update violation count
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests
6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:
tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
tests for mining features are named mining_...
tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...
Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.
Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16
* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: Fix excluded test names
* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
