4eca20d6f7d850492d331d89d1cdd77abb3c70c1 [doc] correct comment about ATMPW (glozow)
8fa74aeb5b96419c7d40b40f8e1e1269509278e2 [doc] correct comment in chainparams (glozow)
2f8272c2a4b6fa84c04dfeb4d751bb218f2d4c78 [doc] GetBestBlock() doesn't do nothing (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Came across a few misleading comments, wanted to fix them
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 4eca20d6f7
MarcoFalke:
ACK 4eca20d6f7d850492d331d89d1cdd77abb3c70c1
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4eca20d6f7d850492d331d89d1cdd77abb3c70c1
Tree-SHA512: 5bef1f1e7703f304128cf0eb8945e139e031580c99062bbbe15bf4db8443c2ba5a8c65844833132e6646c8980c678fc1d2ab0c63e17105585d583570ee350fd0
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Since v19, Evo nodes are paid 4x blocks in a row.
This needs to be reverted when MN Reward Reallocation activates.
## What was done?
Starting from MN Reward Reallocation activation, Evo nodes are paid one
block in a row (like regular masternodes).
In addition, `nConsecutivePayments` isn't incremented anymore for Evo
nodes.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_hpmn.py` with MN Reward Reallocation activation.
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This is an implementation of DIP0027 "Credit Asset Locks".
It's a mechanism to fluidly exchange between Dash and credits.
## What was done?
This pull request includes:
- Asset Lock transaction
- Asset Unlock transaction (withdrawal)
- Credit Pool in coinbase
- Unit tests for Asset Lock/Unlock tx
- New functional test `feature_asset_locks.py`
RPC: currently locked amount (credit pool) is available through rpc call
`getblock`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
There added new unit tests for basic checks of transaction validity
(asset lock/unlock).
Also added new functional test "feature_asset_locks.py" that cover
typical cases, but not all corner cases yet.
## Breaking Changes
This feature should be activated as hard-fork because:
- It adds 2 new special transaction and one of them [asset unlock tx]
requires update consensus rulels
- It adds new data in coinbase tx (credit pool)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**To release DIP 0027**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
V19 is active on mainnet/testnet now, no need to check activation bits
anymore. This PR also bumps `MinBIP9WarningHeight` to
post-v19-activation height which should stop `unknown new rules
activated (versionbit 8)` warning from appearing.
## What was done?
Bury v19, bump `MinBIP9WarningHeight`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, reindex on mainnet/testnet.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
During implementation #5469 (master node hard-fork) I noticed that some
parts of `CChainParams` are deprecated and can be removed.
## What was done?
1. removed methods from `CChainParams` that have no implementation at
all:
- UpdateSubsidyAndDiffParams
- UpdateLLMQChainLocks
- UpdateLLMQTestParams
- UpdateLLMQDevnetParams
2. removed method `BIP9CheckMasternodesUpgraded` from `CChainParams` and
a flag `check_mn_protocol` from `versionbitsinfo`.
(to follow-up dashpay/dash#2594)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
bump chainparams to some post failed-v19-fork block on mainnet and post
recent-v19-fork block on testnet
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Same as #5428 but with a lower block number this time. This should let
us simply reorg testnet with 18.2.2 at deeper blocks instead of bumping
v19 testnet activation params for 19.2.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Having these above v19 forkpoint (850100) would result in v19.2 nodes
forking at the wrong height (864000) when reindexing without
`--assumevalid=<0 or some pre-v19 block height>`
## What was done?
Go back to pre-v19 block (850000) in chainparams
## How Has This Been Tested?
reindex
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mainnet chain has stalled. The root issue does not appear trivial to
resolve, as such the most optimal path is likely to delay the v19 hard
fork
## What was done?
Delayed HF
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
This will hard fork mainnet
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This changes are follow up for backport bitcoin/bitcoin#16060
## What was done?
Buried all hardened dash deployments
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
Run dash with option `-reindex` for both mainnet/testnet - both succeed.
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes, it should be fully compatible.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We had forgotten to harden dip20 and dip24 activation
## What was done?
Hardened dip20 and dip24 activation
## How Has This Been Tested?
Hasn't yet; should do an assumevalid=0 reindex
## Breaking Changes
Hopefully none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.
CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.
This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
ariard:
ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
MarcoFalke:
ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)
Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Increased v20 deployment window size in order to delay v20 activation.
Only for regtest
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added v20 BIP9 style fork structure along with utility functions.
Since several features coming depending on that fork status, we needed
to group them into one
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294
## What was done?
Bumped defaultAssumeValid, nMinimumChainWork, chainTxData,
checkPointsData
## How Has This Been Tested?
Called rpcs `getblockhash N`, `getblock HASH`, `getchaintxstats 17280
HASH`
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Mainnet activation start time is set to: `Tuesday, April 25, 2023
0:00:00`,
and timeout to: `Thursday, April 25, 2024 0:00:00`
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Delayed activation to reexperience rc.6
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This allows us to have a bit more granular control over GetLLMQ results,
removes code duplication and also optimises things a tiny bit by
replacing "HasLLMQ + GetLLMQParams" calls with simply "GetLLMQParams".
## What was done?
Use `optional` in `GetLLMQ`, drop `HasLLMQ`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, reindex on testnet/mainnet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Block 847000 hf should happen somewhere around March 4th. We need mining
nodes to be upgraded to follow that chain and mine correct blocks.
However we don't want v19 to be activated shortly after (~300 blocks),
we want to give it a little bit of time to let (new) platform quorums
form and make sure everything is ok. With this patch we should have ~2
days (instead of half of a day).
## What was done?
bumped v19 activation start time to March 6th
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
yes :)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
- Added new LLMQ type `llmq_25_67`
- The above LLMQ is added only for Testnet and it is activated with v19
fork.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently, by default in devnet, the LLMQ set for Platform is
`LLMQ_100_67`.
Obviously this is too big for usual devnets, therefore the new
`LLMQ_DEVNET_PLATFORM` is created (size 12, threshold 67%).
`LLMQ_100_67` is still the default one: added possibility to overwrite
it by passing argument `-llmqplatform` (devnets only)
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Implementation of 4k collateral HPMN.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+pastapastapasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <1935069+Udjinm6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <545784+knst@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
Hasn't been
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
* feat(llmq): Introduce useRotation in LLMQParams
* fix(llmq): Fix IsQuorumRotationEnabled to recognize all dip0024 quorums
* fix(llmq): Do not allow rotation llmqs for `-llmqinstantsend` and non-rotation ones for `-llmqinstantsenddip0024`
* fix(llmq): Unify and fix IsMiningPhase
NOTE: no need for 1 extra block in mining phase for rotation quorums
* chore(llmq): Reduce the number of IsQuorumRotationEnabled calls
* chore(llmq): Improve logging
* feat(llmq): Make `llmq-` threads for rotation quorums distinguishable by quorum index
* fix(llmq): Fix another endless loop in GetQuorumRelayMembers
* throw an error when a llmq type with an incompatible rotation flag is picked for `-llmq...` params
* Add a note about loop conditions
* llmq: Make TransactionRemovedFromMempool the last action for invalid txes, just like we do for orphans with rejected parents
Write to log, send reject msg and (maybe) punish first and only then notify IS about the tx removal. Makes it easier to reason about it when reading logs.
This was previously hard-coded in Sentinel, and can be useful to refactor
future versions of Sentinel (in progress), as well as to bring superblock logic
into DashCore in the future.
* Added GET_SNAPSHOT_INFO message handling
* Quorum members by rotation
* Quorum utils functions
* Handle GET_QUORUM_ROTATION_INFO with baseBlockHash from client
* Storing QuorumSnaphots in evoDB when requesting them
* Added DIP Enforcement param
* quorumIndex cache
* Quorum Rotation deployment control
* Usage of Bitsets for storing CQuorumSnapshots
* Correct handling of early quorum quarters
* More asserts
* Corrections
* Handling of quorumIndex
* Refactoring of truncate mechanism
* Various fixes
* Interface correction
* Added template type for indexed cache
* Added quorumIndex into commitmenHash
* Various changes
* Needs to update maqQuorumsCache along with indexedQuorumsCache
* Added CFinalCommitment version 2
* Renamed variables
* Fixes
* Refactoring & correct caching of quorumMembers by rotation
* Added assertions
* Refactoring
* Interface change
* Handling of previous DKG session failure
* Applied refactoring
* Build quarter members improvments
* Merge Quorum Rotation and Decreased fee into one deployment (DIP24)
* Added new LLMQ Type
* Added functional tests + refactoring
* Refactoring
* Spreaded Quorum creation and Quorum Index adaptation
* quorumIndex adaptations
* Added quorumIndex in CFinalCommitment
* Latest work
* Final refactoring
* Batch of refactoring
* Fixes for tests
* Fix for CFinalCommitment
* Fix for Quorums
* Fix
* Small changes
* Thread sync fic
* Safety changes
* Reuse mns when needed
* Refactoring
* More refactoring
* Fixes for rotationinfo handling
* Fix for rotation of members
* Correct order of MNs lists in Quorum Snapshots
* Adding extra logs
* Sync rotation quorums + qrinfo changes
* Fix + extra logs
* Removed redundant field
* Fix for null final commitment + refactoring
* Added timers in tests
* Fix for qrinfo message: quorumdiff and merkleRootQuorums
* Small changes for rotation test
* Remove reading from scanQuorumCache
* Added quorum list output
* Crash fix
* Experimental commit
* apply changes to specialtxman.cpp from specialtx.cpp
* all the changes
* substancially speed up feature_llmq_rotation.py
* reenable asserts, add check for reorgs
* Refactoring
* Added extra logs
* format
* trivial
* drop extra boost includes
* drop ContainsMN
* fix ScanQuorums
* check quorum hash and index in CFinalCommitment::Verify
* fix/tweak tests
* IsQuorumRotationEnabled should be aware of the context
* Calculating members based on earlier block.
* Fix for Quorum Members Cache
* Removed duplicate size of baseBlockHashes
* Adaptations of qrinfo to -8 mn lists
* Introduction of llmqTypeDIP24InstantSend
* Adaptation for llmqTypeDIP24InstantSend
* Adaptations for IS
* bump protocol version
* Added feature_llmq_is_migration test
* Various cleanups
* use unordered_lru_cache for quorumSnapshotCache
* trivial refactor ComputeQuorumMembersByQuarterRotation
* Reduced CFinalCommitment::quorumIndex from 32 to 16 bits
* Keep verified LLMQ relay connections
* Experimental Relay connection fix
* Fix for EnsureQuorumConnections rotation
* Using only valid Mns for checking
* Override of nPowTargetSpacing (devnet only)
* Show penalty score in masternode rpc
* fixups
* Rotation refactoring
* Update src/chainparams.cpp
* Replaced LogPrintf with LogPrint
* IS locking fix once DIP24 activation
* Various cleanup
* Updated MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION
* Introduce LLMQ_TEST_INSTANTSEND reg-test only quorum and actually test switching to dip0024 quorums
* Renamed field lastQuorumHashPerIndex
* Renamed to DIP0024
* chore: update nStartTime and nTimeout for mainnet / testnet for DEPLOYMENT_DIP0024
Co-authored-by: Kittywhiskers Van Gogh <63189531+kittywhiskers@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
37b8475dcf61383dffffebae374eab07c14aee80 Chainparams: Use name constants in chainparams initialization (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
I thought this wouldn't work for some reason, but it seems it does.
Just a little bit more consistency. I'm still not able to use them in qt/networkstyle.cpp though, not sure why.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 37b8475dcf61383dffffebae374eab07c14aee80
laanwj:
ACK 37b8475dcf61383dffffebae374eab07c14aee80
hebasto:
ACK 37b8475dcf61383dffffebae374eab07c14aee80, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
fjahr:
ACK 37b8475
Tree-SHA512: d9fa5df5650e10c645ac1f3afe831674a47f35d4a649e18a3d2aee1d04b08e6896aff6f1bbed0630d28775c51f989f9daaa9e405c9f3d7dca30e639a6f9008f0
fab17e8272f5f70213f186809479ee7a75898b1d test: Add basic test for BIP34 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
BIP34 was disabled for testing, which explains why it had no test.
Fix that by enabling it and adding a test.
Tree-SHA512: 9cb5702d474117ce6420226eb93ee09d6fb5fc856fabc8b67abe56a088cd727674e0e5462000e1afa83b911374036f90abdbdde56a8c236a75572ed47e10a00f
* feat: introduce devnetVersion as a method for breaking changes to devnets
include devnetVersion in expected version for devnet connections
* feat: always use DGW on devnets
* fix p2p_connect_to_devnet.py
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
fa4a605a4c611abe9af4c18aab20f4d1d039170f Remove wallet settings from chainparams (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Feels a bit odd to have wallet setting in the chainparams, so remove them from there
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK fa4a605a4c611abe9af4c18aab20f4d1d039170f, missed s/2018/2019?
practicalswift:
utACK fa4a605a4c611abe9af4c18aab20f4d1d039170f
darosior:
ACK fa4a605a4c611abe9af4c18aab20f4d1d039170f
Tree-SHA512: 2b3a5ee85d36af290d7db80bed1339e3c684607f1ce61cc65c906726e9174e40325fb1f67a34d8780f2a61fa39a1785e7c3a1cef5b6d6c364f38db5300cdbe3a
fa89badf887dcc01e5bdece248b5e7d234fee227 test: Require standard txs in regtest (MarcoFalke)
fa9b4191609c3ef75e69d391eb91e4d5c1e0bcf5 test: Add test that mainnet requires standard txs (MarcoFalke)
fa613ca0a8f99c4771859de9e571878530d3ecb5 chainparams: Remove unused fMineBlocksOnDemand (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I don't see a reason why regtest should allow non-standard txs, as it makes testing mainnet behaviour such as #15846 unnecessarily hard and unintuitive.
Of course, testnet policy remains unchanged to allow propagation of non-standard txs.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa89badf887dcc01e5bdece248b5e7d234fee227
Tree-SHA512: c4c675affb054868850bd2683aa07f4c741a448cbacb2ea8334191e105f426b0790fe6a468be61e9c5880d24154f7bf1c7075051697172dce92180c1bc3a1c90
3f592b8 [QA] add wallet-rbf test (Jonas Schnelli)
8222e05 Disable wallet fallbackfee by default on mainnet (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Removes the default fallback fee on mainnet (but keeps it on testnet/regtest).
Transactions using the fallbackfee in case the fallback fee has not been set are getting rejected.
Tree-SHA512: e54d2594b7f954e640cc513a18b0bfbe189f15e15bdeed4fe02b7677f939bca1731fef781b073127ffd4ce08a595fb118259b8826cdaa077ff7d5ae9495810db
* refactor: use a vector instead of map for llmqs
this is a valuable refactor for a number of reasons.
it forces the removal of more verbose `Params().GetConsensus().llmqs.count` and instead call to `Params().HasLLMQ()`
`llmqs` is now stored in contiguous memory (which hopefully means better lookup time / iteration time)
std::vector is much more constexpr friendly, and normally is better optimized
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* use copy_if
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fixes
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Implement hf for reduced governance fee
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* update VersionBitsDeploymentInfo
* Adjust activation times for gov fee hard fork
* Use raw timestamps
* Adjust timestamps
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
string_view is needed for compile time interpretation (constexpr) of the LLMQParams
constexpr is good to add such that we aren't initializing in static scope, but instead at compile time
Sadly using string_view will require that we construct a std::string when passing into univalue, however, this isn't in a performance important section (rpc) and as such another allocation is an okay trade off for the benefits of constexpr
Also, now we aren't having extern variables, which should make the linker mildly happier
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Merge #13311: Don't edit Chainparams after initialization
6fa901fb47 Don't edit Chainparams after initialization (Jorge Timón)
980b38f8a1 MOVEONLY: Move versionbits info out of versionbits.o (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
This encapsulates the "-vbparams" option, which is only meant for regtest, directly on CRegTestParams.
This is a refactor and doesn't change functionality.
Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8994
Tree-SHA512: 79771d729a63a720e743a9c77d5e2d80369f072d66202a43c1304e83a7d0ef7c6103d4968a03aea9666cc89a7203c618da972124a677b38cfe62ddaeb28f9f5d
* Resolve Merge with #13311
* Incorporated review changes
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Update src/chainparams.cpp
* Update src/chainparams.cpp
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
9d0e52834 implements different disk sizes for different networks on intro (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13213.
Mostly, I layed out the concept to open the PR for refinement and getting feedback if the approach is okay. Changes are expected.
Two points:
- The values for both new consts `TESTNET_BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE` and `TESTNET_CHAIN_STATE_SIZE` is certainly not optimal; I just checked the size of my testnet3 related dirs and set them to little bit higher values. Which values should be used?
- Should we do something like this to regtest? Or these "niceties" do not matter when on regtest?
Thanks!
Tree-SHA512: 8ae87a29fa8356b899e7a823c76cde793d9126b4ee59554d7a2a8edb088fe42a19976b34c06c2fd4a98a727e1e4971dd983f42b6093ea6caa255b45004e22bb4
fab52675144480c96c5564da4650205f1a41b08e doxygen: Remove misleading checkpoints comment in CMainParams (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the checkpoints comment because it is misleading for two reasons:
* It shows up in the doxygen documentation of `CMainParams` https://dev.visucore.com/bitcoin/doxygen/class_c_main_params.html
* The comment refers to "strange transactions" in a block, which are not specified further. Transactions in blocks are always consensus-valid or rejected as consensus-invalid.
Also sort the includes with `clang-format`, as the file is touched anyway.
Tree-SHA512: b75f38dd0422b9310218307cbaa4dd5afa7579612d7dcdf781b8f25626f79c11e090dbcc83a05571f4418220c1a005f6254a9c461534d517ccecf7f1920be6be
# Conflicts:
# src/chainparams.cpp
* docs: Add help for -recsigsmaxage option
* Make `-llmq-data-recovery` help string dynamic
* Make devnet/regtest specific help strings dynamic
Only show devnet related help strings on devnet.
* Make linter happy
* Skip FindDevNetGenesisBlock when creating devnet params for help purposes only
Set `nTimeout` to `999999999999ULL` on testnet and devents for all bits that were activated on mainnet already to ensure they are going to be activated on future network resets.
* Add LLMQ_100_67 quorums
* Re-use DEPLOYMENT_V17 bit to activate LLMQ_100_67 quorums
* Add LLMQ_TEST_NEW quorum and test its activation
* Tweak mine_quorum to work correctly with multiple quorum types
And to avoid a potentialy endless "while" loop
* llmq: Rename IsQuorumTypeEnabledAtBlock -> IsQuorumTypeEnabled
* chainparams|test: Rename llmq_test_new -> llmq_test_v17
* chainparams|consensus|llmq: Rename LLMQ_TEST_NEW -> LLMQ_TEST_V17
* Tweak few strings and the name of the test
* llmq: Make GetEnabledQuorumTypes return a vector of LLMQTypes, introduce GetLLMQParams
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Tweak minSize
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
* Exclude LLMQ_100_67 from Concentrated Recovery
* Update test/functional/feature_new_quorum_type_activation.py
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
* Implement new hardfork for v17 to be used in future changes
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix comment
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update nMinimumChainWork and defaultAssumeValid
* Update chainTxData
* Bump BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE
It's 21Gb on my local machine atm, bumping to 25Gb to give it some space
* `gen-manpages.sh`
* bupm BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE 25->30
* Implement dynamic activation thresholds
* fix
* Revert unrelated changes
* Clarify switching to/staying in LOCKED_IN state
* Fix signal function to work correctly with num_blocks=0
* Add simplified threshold calculation and use it in tests
* Check that thresholds are decreasing, reach the min level and stay there
* Drop `;`
* Implement Block Reward Reallocation
* Add integr. test
* drop unused variable
* Sep -> Oct
* Update test/functional/feature_block_reward_reallocation.py
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
* Revert to Sep for testnet and devnet
* validation: Refactor reallocation calculations
Makes it much more readable imo and avoids calculating the percentage
each time.
* test: Align reallocation calculation with c++ (GetMasternodePayment)
* test: Make feature_block_reward_allocation.py executable
* Make linter happy
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
* Harden Spork6
Spork6 was previously activated on testnet, but we then developed an alternative fix for the issue and never activated spork6 on mainnet. At this point, Spork6 will not be activated on mainnet.
As such, it makes sense to harden Spork6 and ensure that spork6 will never be activated on mainnet. So, we just change from checking Spork6 to checking if we are on testnet. If we are on testnet, use spork6 logic, else don't.
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* remove now unused SPORK_6_NEW_SIGS
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* force fSporkSixActive to be correct, otherwise return
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Harden spork6 even more
* Add TODO in chainparams as a reminder to drop all spork6 related code on next testnet reset
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add spork to change max mixing participants to 20
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Also change min participants on devnet/testnet
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* adjust formatting
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* add nPoolNewMinParticipants under regtest
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Use "devnet" instead of "dev" for network id
Otherwise one would have to use "dev.port=123" in configs, which might
be confusing as we usually name such networks "devnet".
* Fix ArgsManager::GetChainName to work with devnets again
-devnet is not a boolean arg, but a string. So we have to check for
existence only.
77a733a99 [tests] Add additional unit tests for -nofoo edge cases (Anthony Towns)
af173c2be [tests] Check GetChainName works with config entries (Anthony Towns)
fa27f1c23 [tests] Add unit tests for ReadConfigStream (Anthony Towns)
087c5d204 ReadConfigStream: assume the stream is good (Anthony Towns)
6d5815aad Separate out ReadConfigStream from ReadConfigFile (Anthony Towns)
834d30341 [tests] Add unit tests for GetChainName (Anthony Towns)
11b6b5b86 Move ChainNameFromCommandLine into ArgsManager and rename to GetChainName (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This does a bit of refactoring of the configuration handling code in order to add additional tests to make adding support for [test]/[regtest] sections in the config file in #11862 easier. Should not cause any behaviour changes.
Tree-SHA512: 8d2ce1449fc180de03414e7e569d1a21ba1e9f6564e13d3faf3961f710adc725fa0d4ab49b89ebd2baa11ea36ac5018377f693a84037d386a8b8697c9d6db3e9
