fafddfadda0c77876ba764c5b65ee5fa8e53a5e0 scripted-diff: Remove shadowing lock annotations (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Would be good to not redundantly copy the lock annotation from the class declaration to the member implementation. Otherwise it may not result in a compile failure if a new lock requirement is added to the member implementation, but not the class declaration.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK `fafddfadda`, confirmed that the annotations removed were all redundant. confirmed the claim of potential issue :)
hebasto:
ACK fafddfadda0c77876ba764c5b65ee5fa8e53a5e0
jonatack:
Light utACK fafddfadda0c77876ba764c5b65ee5fa8e53a5e0 verified that the removed annotations in the definitions correspond to those in their respective declarations
Tree-SHA512: ea095c6d4e0bedd70d4e2d8a42b06cfd90c161ebfcaac13558c5dc065601a732e5f812f332104b7daa087aa57b8b0242b177799d22eef7628d77d4d87f443bf2
fa61b9d1a68820758f9540653920deaeae6abe79 util: Add ArgsManager::GetCommand() and use it in bitcoin-wallet (MarcoFalke)
7777105a24a36b62df35d12ecf6c6370671568c8 refactor: Move all command dependend checks to ExecuteWalletToolFunc (MarcoFalke)
fa06bce4ac17f93decd4ee38c956e7aa55983f0d test: Add tests (MarcoFalke)
fac05ccdade8b34c969b9cd9b37b355bc0aabf9c wallet: [refactor] Pass ArgsManager to WalletAppInit (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This not only moves the parsing responsibility out from the wallet tool, but it also makes it easier to implement bitcoin-util #19937Fixes: #20902
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa61b9d1a68820758f9540653920deaeae6abe79
fjahr:
Code review ACK fa61b9d1a68820758f9540653920deaeae6abe79
Tree-SHA512: 79622b806e8bf9dcd0dc24a8a6687345710df57720992e83a41cd8d6762a6dc112044ebc58fcf6e8fbf45de29a79b04873c5b8c2494a1eaaf902a2884703e47b
c943282b5e6312537f885c811d43120ce2f5b766 validation: remove redundant check on pindex (jarolrod)
Pull request description:
This removes a redundant check on `pindex` being a `nullptr`. By the time we get to this step `pindex` is always a `nullptr` as the branch where it has been set would have already returned.
Closes#19223
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
re-ACK c943282
ajtowns:
ACK c943282b5e6312537f885c811d43120ce2f5b766 - code review only
MarcoFalke:
review ACK c943282b5e6312537f885c811d43120ce2f5b766 📨
theStack:
re-ACK c943282b5e6312537f885c811d43120ce2f5b766
Tree-SHA512: d2dc58206be61d2897b0703ee93af67abed492a80e84ea03dcfbf7116833173da3bdafa18ff80422d5296729d5254d57cc1db03fdaf817c8f57c62c3abef673c
faff3991a9be0ea7be31685fb46d94c212c5da34 ci: Fuzz with integer sanitizer (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Otherwise the suppressions file will go out of sync
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faff3991a9be0ea7be31685fb46d94c212c5da34: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 349216d071a2c5ccf24565fe0c52d7a570ec148d515d085616a284f1ab9992ce10ff82eb17962dddbcda765bbd3a9b15e8b25f34bdbed99fc36922d4161d307c
faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a p2p: Ignore version msgs after initial version msg (MarcoFalke)
fad68afcff731153d1c83f7f56c91ecbb264b59a p2p: Ignore non-version msgs before version msg (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Handshake misbehaviour doesn't cost us more than any other unknown message, so it seems odd to treat it differently
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a
practicalswift:
ACK faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 9f30c3b5c1f6604fd02cff878f10999956152419a3dd9825f8267cbdeff7d06787418b41c7fde8a00a5e557fe89204546e05d5689042dbf7b07fbb7eb95cddff
fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2 refactor: Use C++17 std::array where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using the C++11 std::array with explicit template parameters is problematic because overshooting the size will fill the memory with default constructed types.
For example,
```cpp
#include <array>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::array<int, 3> a{1, 2};
for (const auto& i : a) {
std::cout << i << std::endl; // prints "1 2 0"
}
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Code Review ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2
practicalswift:
cr ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2
vasild:
ACK fac7ab1d
promag:
Code review ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2.
Tree-SHA512: ef7e872340226e0d6160e6fd66c6ca78b2ef9c245fa0ab27fe4777aac9fba8d5aaa154da3d27b65dec39a6a63d07f1063c3a8ffb667a98ab137756a1a0af2656
76b4300fdf fix: Let addrman handle multiple ports for all networks (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There is really no need to do have this restriction in `addrman`, we check `AllowMultiplePorts()` in `connman` which should be enough already. We can safely re-align `addrman` to its upstream implementation as suggested in #6043.
## What was done?
Drop port "discrimination" in `addrman`, remove related tests.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, run dash-qt on mainnet/testnet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
kwvg:
ACK 76b4300fdf
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 76b4300fdf422097b0b39460e80ee4da98247f03; is it really a fix or a refactor? doesn't change observable system behavior
knst:
utACK 76b4300fdf
Tree-SHA512: 50363b5de7a6c6ad4de18c08b0a5cc31e89be8e5304f9684ce2cc609df4de07ff6d8d010556b5f6651c698e1a86960dba8005cc26fdb00bd03c856752d3e06ef
fbffe06dad fix: suppress lint warnings for edge due to both missing epoll and kpoll (Konstantin Akimov)
b799683d60 fix: pass reference instead copy of argument in util/edge (Konstantin Akimov)
9d941aacb9 fix: removed unused assigned (Konstantin Akimov)
d9e2e47685 fix: add a missing file util/wpipe to linter lists (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some source files in src/util is missing to specify as dash specific for linters
## What was done?
Added to list of dash's linters
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run `test/lint/lint-all.sh`
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK fbffe06dad
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK fbffe06dad
kwvg:
utACK fbffe06dad
Tree-SHA512: 05bd40f987a93b47ca939f37d6e5b62e2044f2acce7a6ea6c361594eace808da17b17e0149095daecd0fb5418c6cbedbc70ad07ac3b7a1156a94188b04c2fd00
fb8a4db8f6 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26717: test: Improve `check-doc.py` pattern (MarcoFalke)
349cad2865 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26708: clang-tidy: Fix `modernize-use-nullptr` in headers (MarcoFalke)
6bf786d168 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25735: net: remove useless call to IsReachable() from CConnman::Bind() (fanquake)
012b0b7169 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24258: test: check localaddresses in getnetworkinfo for nodes with proxy (MarcoFalke)
c67f527b0b Merge bitcoin-core/gui#448: Add helper to load font (Hennadii Stepanov)
8e0abeb1c1 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#345: Connection Type Translator Comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
688b66e9d1 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#266: Doc: Copyright: Fix embedded font file location (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Trivial backports
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Built and ran tests locally; p2p_addr_relay.py fails locally. Not sure why
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK fb8a4db8f6
knst:
utACK fb8a4db8f6
Tree-SHA512: abb9469f25c6d45acea01da6d2b9cb6df94822f61d06f80e3008b32d2522016370a1e0b0c9ff95b92df22c4f227fc40f7765d76f1987eac7603155fe2d894593
b478406f9f refactor: clean-up, missing const in rpc/quorums (Konstantin Akimov)
50c99e84f8 fix: adopt platform restriction for new composite commands (Konstantin Akimov)
e3c4d66ef3 refactor: quorum sign methods (Konstantin Akimov)
2af9d86654 refactor: use new approach for rpc quorums NNN (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
See #6051
## What was done?
Commands starting from 'quorum ...' uses new a new way to make composite commands.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
Please notice, there's required extra changes for platform restrictions, the subcommand is no more first argument, but part of command, space separated.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK b478406f9f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b478406f9f
Tree-SHA512: c53856a3f45fee44a8130876ed4545f6f2c0f59f74e4d4745e7354097fee3a74ed526cc8160de532dbb4aeb81b82638ee912a0961b910692e78889baa2c976c3
a86f975ad9 fix: build with gcc 13.2.0 - missing header memory in addrdb (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
```
In file included from test/addrman_tests.cpp:5:
./addrdb.h:51:99: error: ‘std::unique_ptr’ has not been declared
51 | std::optional<bilingual_str> LoadAddrman(const std::vector<bool>& asmap, const ArgsManager& args, std::unique_ptr<AddrMan>& addrman);
| ^~~
./addrdb.h:51:114: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘<’ token
51 | std::optional<bilingual_str> LoadAddrman(const std::vector<bool>& asmap, const ArgsManager& args, std::unique_ptr<AddrMan>& addrman);
|
```
## What was done?
adds missing header `<memory>` in addrdb
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run build - it works
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK a86f975ad9
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK a86f975ad9
Tree-SHA512: e25f63b6b823b3ef0a0dcb43386bed144ab68e05d09552dc109fb7687e16422949cfc4deb1b65d6d0d842299bd0e13da673d90aae695dcedeec4bc27f33c6f5f
71d14528ca refactor: enumerate each CNode argument on a separate line (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
f8d1e5b3ec merge bitcoin#25174: Add thread safety related annotations for CNode and Peer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
4847f6e96f refactor: move `m_initial_sync_finished` out of header (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
dba4cf056b merge bitcoin#25591: Version handshake to libtest_util (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b9b13bd8ec merge bitcoin#24141: Rename message_command variables in src/net* and src/rpc/net.cpp (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a6aa3735be merge bitcoin#20196: fix GetListenPort() to derive the proper port (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c443cf4825 merge bitcoin#24078: Rename CNetMessage::m_command with CNetMessage::m_type (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
182e31d04c merge bitcoin#23801: Change time variable type from int64_t to std::chrono::seconds in net_processing.cpp (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
6e6c9442fa merge bitcoin#23758: Use type-safe mockable time for peer connection time (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7beeae77b9 merge bitcoin#23614: add unit test for block-relay-only eviction (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
cf8f17e423 merge bitcoin#22735: Don't return an optional from TransportDeserializer::GetMessage() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
224fb687c8 merge bitcoin#20541: Move special CAddress-without-nTime logic to net_processing (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
30ac41e068 merge bitcoin#22284: performance improvements to ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ad4369fd83 merge bitcoin#21571: make sure non-IP peers get discouraged and disconnected (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 71d14528ca
UdjinM6:
utACK 71d14528ca
Tree-SHA512: b214d50fd87a046f22a9b3baf676483b4eee45ad267a4e501b221bbc77ef1e4532f0ad1fc8931be66761a9c50f2033ceeabbaae2bdb42f7c9edf7708bac8a9eb
64f34770c5 refactor: remove unused header spork.h from rpc/masternode (Konstantin Akimov)
43e9ab4966 refactor: use new type of composite commands for masternode NNN (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
See #6051
## What was done?
Commands starting from 'masternode ...' uses new a new way to make composite commands.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
Please notice, we support both styles `masternodelist` and `masternode list` which are still both supported.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 64f34770c5
Tree-SHA512: 5a658588dff7f29d3025d2a720c8efe8096f79e8d632800911573f2f9a42450c2f27da070a94c5739e2027153413cdcacde82a7b4614467e036c008719692ed9
The PeerManager implementation was moved into the source file in
bitcoin#20811 (dash#5352) but the PR that introduced `m_initial_sync_finished`
bitcoin#19858 (dash#5869) was merged later and didn't account for the
out-of-order backport. We need to correct for that manually.
c24804cd40 merge bitcoin#24378: make bind() and listen() mockable/testable (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
be19868659 merge bitcoin#25426: add new method Sock::GetSockName() that wraps getsockname() and use it in GetBindAddress() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
6b159f1b87 merge bitcoin#24357: make setsockopt() and SetSocketNoDelay() mockable/testable (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
9c751ef9d6 merge bitcoin#23604: Use Sock in CNode (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
508044c0fa merge bitcoin#21879: wrap accept() and extend usage of Sock (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6018
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK c24804cd40
Tree-SHA512: 5149de0f1983bb56517c30b31d137b33b8a49b0e695be2dada71ff3e3bb22908556db343391b7df7e3c7c2ed60ae1fc11a4f4af4f47e35a2a1d3ce7463c03d41
