fa178a6385 [rpc] mining: Omit uninitialized currentblockweight, currentblocktx (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Previously we'd report "0", which could be mistaken for a valid number. E.g. the number of transactions is 0 or the block weight is 0, whatever that means.
Tree-SHA512: ee94ab203a329e272211b726f4c23edec4b09c650ec363b77fd59ad9264165d73064f78ebb9e11b5c2c543b73c157752410a307655560531c7d5444d203aa0ea
59e387705c7e55ec40400301346354fa2d0c613f test: add invalid tx templates for use in functional tests (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This change adds a list of `CTransaction`-generating templates which each correspond to a specific type of invalid transaction. We then use this list to test for a wider variety of invalid tx types in `p2p_invalid_tx.py` and `feature_block.py`.
Consolidating all invalid tx types will allow us to more easily cover all tx reject cases from a variety of tests without repeating ourselves. Validation logic doesn't differ much between mempool and block acceptance, but there *is* a difference and we should be sure we're testing both comprehensively.
Right now, I've only added templates covering the tx reject types listed below but if this approach seems worthwhile I will expand the list to be fully comprehensive.
```
bad-txns-in-belowout
bad-txns-inputs-duplicate
bad-txns-too-many-sigops
bad-txns-vin-empty
bad-txns-vout-empty
bad-txns-vout-negative
```
Tree-SHA512: 05407f4a953fbd7c44c08bb49bb989cefd39a2b05ea00f5b3c92197a3f05e1b302f789e33832445734220e1c333d133aba385740b77b84139b170c583471ce20
fa8489a15511f61a372473927e73c34692bbec23 test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx (MarcoFalke)
77770d95e2838d7665fa8f621e9e83d79f9b3196 test: Properly serialize BIP34 coinbase height (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This adds a test for BIP30 to check that duplicate txs can exist in the blockchain given the first one was completely spent when the second one is added. (Requested by ajtowns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16333#issuecomment-508604071)
We can not add a test that a later duplicate tx overwrites a previous one, because BIP30 is always enforced on regtest. If someone feels strongly about such a test, some Bitcoin Core code would have to be modified, which can be done in a follow up pull request.
Also, add a commit to fix the BIP34 test failures reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14633#issue-227712540
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa8489a15511f61a372473927e73c34692bbec23
Tree-SHA512: c707d0bdc93937263876b603425b53322a2a9f9ec3f50716ae2fa9de8ddc644beb22b26c1bfde7f4aab102633e096b354ef380db919176bd2cb44a2828f884aa
* Implement Block Reward Reallocation
* Add integr. test
* drop unused variable
* Sep -> Oct
* Update test/functional/feature_block_reward_reallocation.py
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
* Revert to Sep for testnet and devnet
* validation: Refactor reallocation calculations
Makes it much more readable imo and avoids calculating the percentage
each time.
* test: Align reallocation calculation with c++ (GetMasternodePayment)
* test: Make feature_block_reward_allocation.py executable
* Make linter happy
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
