fa677d1801fb9153a95a1fc9855fd5f21fc440c0 ci: Remove redundant check for TRAVIS_OS_NAME (MarcoFalke)
fadccb263baf6b8694f750623add42f966e423a3 doc: Document that GNU tools are required for linters (MarcoFalke)
4444704ca9f66cdc24ab2d444941354db1dfed06 ci: Cleanup macOS runs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
* Remove a commented out cleanup task in `before_cache`
* Remove the linter run on macOS, and document that GNU tools are required to run the linters
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK fa677d1801fb9153a95a1fc9855fd5f21fc440c0
laanwj:
ACK fa677d1801fb9153a95a1fc9855fd5f21fc440c0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa677d1801fb9153a95a1fc9855fd5f21fc440c0 for new third commit replacing TRAVIS_OS_NAME check with NO_DEPENDS setting
Tree-SHA512: 9122a63bbe7887d9e379123152ea4ba44324cb18033b9e6b45bfdb1af665c10ea598564b9fcd57330d208a08e4696e41b4d6175f05f0843a3a76530da114f8c6
* Update to leveldb upstream using subtree merge
* Import crc32c using subtree merge as as 'src/crc32c'
* build: Update build system for new leveldb
Upstream leveldb switched build systems, which means we need to define
a few different values.
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* doc: Add crc32c subtree to developer notes
* test: Add crc32c to subtree check linter
* test: Add crc32c exception to various linters and generation scripts
* build: Add LCOV exception for crc32c
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* build: CRC32C build system integration
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
fa3c910bfeab00703c947c5200a64c21225b50ef test: Move linters to test/lint, add readme (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This moves the checks and linters from `devtools` to a subfolder in `test`. (Motivated by my opinion that the dev tools are mostly for generating code and updating the repo whereas the linters are read-only checks.)
Also, adds a readme to clarify that checks and linters are only meant to prevent bugs and user facing issues, not merely stylistic preference or inconsistencies. (This is motivated by the diversity in developers and work flows as well as existing code styles. It would be too disruptive to change all existing code to a single style or too burdensome to force all developers to adhere to a single style. Also note that our style guide is changing, so locking in at the wrong style "too early" would only waste resources.)
Tree-SHA512: 9b10e89f2aeaf0c8a9ae248aa891d74e0abf0569f8e5dfd266446efa8bfaf19f0ea0980abf0b0b22f0d8416ee90d7435d21a9f9285b66df43f370b7979173406
