1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Simply avoiding the hardcoded string in more places for consistency.
It can also allow for more easily reusing tests for other chains other than regtest.
Separated from #8994 .
Continues #16509 .
It is still not complete (ie to be complete, we need the -chain parameter in #16680 and make whether acceptnonstdtxs is allowed for that chain or not customizable for regtest [or for custom chains like in #8994 ] ). But while being incomplete like #16509 , it's quite simple to review and another step forward IMO.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 1abcecc. I think it's an improvement even if incomplete and if some PR's might accidentally bring "regtest" back. Subsequent improvements hopefully don't have to touch 16 files.
elichai:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
Tree-SHA512: 5620de6dab235ca8bd8670d6366c7b9f04f0e3ca9c5e7f87765b38e16ed80c17d7d1630c0d5fd7c5526f070830d94dc74cc2096d8ede87dc7180ed20569509ee
a67352161c68fea9764cc31aff199f112d8572c6 test: skip tool_wallet test when bitcoin-wallet isn't compiled (fanquake)
e9277baed64e1d4054a102e40b39a9aed7839c2f test: skip wallet_listreceivedby test when the cli isn't compiled (fanquake)
621d398750d9f5ce3e7ec75ccb160b3534dcc436 test: skip bitcoin_cli test when the cli isn't compiled (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Don't try and run the `interface_bitcoin_cli.py` test when `bitcoin-cli` isn't available.
```bash
stdout:
2019-11-17T01:51:41.623000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /var/folders/z2/cn877pxd3czdfh47mfkmbwgm0000gn/T/test_runner_₿_🏃_20191116_205141/interface_bitcoin_cli_0
2019-11-17T01:51:41.890000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during testing
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 111, in main
self.run_test()
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py", line 18, in run_test
cli_response = self.nodes[0].cli("-version").send_cli()
File "/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 528, in send_cli
process = subprocess.Popen(p_args, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, universal_newlines=True)
File "/Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in __init__
restore_signals, start_new_session)
File "/Users/michael/.pyenv/versions/3.5.6/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1289, in _execute_child
raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/michael/github/bitcoin/src/bitcoin-cli'
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: de27513a615d9d21271a0948e012c3209351e7374efd19bfa1bb9cda77e8fffe15d99e3424e4dbfa8cf826084f8af1670726f4703bd2b6093e7d37df4bea64f0
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
3c3e31c3a4 [tests] Add wallet-tool test (João Barbosa)
49d2374acf [tools] Add wallet inspection and modification tool (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Adds an offline tool `bitcoin-wallet-tool` for wallet creation and maintenance.
Currently this tool can create a new wallet file, display information on an existing wallet, and run the salvage and zapwallettxes maintenance tasks on an existing wallet. It can later be extended to support other common wallet maintenance tasks.
Doing wallet maintenance tasks in an offline tool makes much more sense (and is potentially safer) than having to spin up a full node.
Tree-SHA512: 75a28b8a58858d9d76c7532db40eacdefc5714ea5aab536fb1dc9756e2f7d750d69d68d59c50a68e633ce38fb5b8c3e3d4880db30fe01561e07ce58d42bceb2b
