Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konstantin Akimov
593c6cff14
feat: instant activation dip-0008 on regtest on first block 2024-08-15 11:26:06 +07:00
fanquake
51911388f2
Merge #21377: Speedy trial support for versionbits
ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79 chainparams: drop versionbits threshold to 90% for mainnnet and signet (Anthony Towns)
f054f6bcd2c2ce5fea84cf8681013f85a444e7ea versionbits: simplify state transitions (Anthony Towns)
55ac5f568a3b73d6f1ef4654617fb76e8bcbccdf versionbits: Add explicit NEVER_ACTIVE deployments (Anthony Towns)
dd07e6da48040dc7eae46bc7941db48d98a669fd fuzz: test versionbits delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
dd85d5411c1702c8ae259610fe55050ba212e21e tests: test versionbits delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
73d4a706393e6dbd6b6d6b6428f8d3233ac0a2d8 versionbits: Add support for delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
9e6b65f6fa205eee5c3b99343988adcb8d320460 tests: clean up versionbits test (Anthony Towns)
593274445004506c921d5d851361aefb3434d744 tests: test ComputeBlockVersion for all deployments (Anthony Towns)
63879f0a4760c0c0f784029849cb5d21ee088abb tests: pull ComputeBlockVersion test into its own function (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  BIP9-based implementation of "speedy trial" activation specification, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-March/018583.html

  Edge cases are tested by fuzzing added in #21380.

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    tACK ffe33dfbd4
  jnewbery:
    utACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79 💈
  achow101:
    re-ACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79
  gmaxwell:
    ACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79
  benthecarman:
    ACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79
  Sjors:
    ACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79
  jonatack:
    Initial approach ACK ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79 after a first pass of review, building and testing each commit, mostly looking at the changes and diffs. Will do a more high-level review iteration. A few minor comments follow to pick/choose/ignore.
  ariard:
    Code Review ACK ffe33df

Tree-SHA512: f79a7146b2450057ee92155cbbbcec12cd64334236d9239c6bd7d31b32eec145a9781c320f178da7b44ababdb8808b84d9d22a40e0851e229ba6d224e3be747c
2024-04-23 22:41:10 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
097a8e7196
non-scripted-diff: bump copyright year to 2023
that's a result of:
contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./

it is not scripted diff, because it works differentlly on my localhost and in CI:
CI doesn't want to use git commit date which is mocked to 30th Dec of 2023
2024-02-24 11:05:37 -06:00
MarcoFalke
4c8e77a48d
Merge #19752: test: Update wait_until usage in tests not to use the one from utils
d841301010914203fb5ef02627c76fad99cb11f1 test: Add docstring to wait_until() in util.py to warn about its usage (Seleme Topuz)
1343c86c7cc1fc896696b3ed87c12039e4ef3a0c test: Update wait_until usage in tests not to use the one from utils (Seleme Topuz)

Pull request description:

  Replace global (from [test_framework/util.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L228)) `wait_until()` usages with the ones provided by `BitcoinTestFramework` and `P2PInterface` classes.

  The motivation behind this change is that the `util.wait_until()` expects a timeout, timeout_factor and lock and it is not aware of the context of the test framework. `BitcoinTestFramework` offers a `wait_until()` which has an understandable amount of default `timeout` and a shared `timeout_factor`. Moreover, on top of these, `mininode.wait_until()` also has a shared lock.

  closes #19080

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK d841301010914203fb5ef02627c76fad99cb11f1 🦆
  kallewoof:
    utACK d841301010914203fb5ef02627c76fad99cb11f1

Tree-SHA512: 81604f4cfa87fed98071a80e4afe940b3897fe65cf680a69619a93e97d45f25b313c12227de7040e19517fa9c003291b232f1b40b2567aba0148f22c23c47a88
2024-01-20 00:07:11 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
f34889dcf4
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology
d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery)
5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery)
85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery)
9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize:

  - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces.
  - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'.

  For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references.

ACKs for top commit:
  amitiuttarwar:
    ACK d5800da519
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞
Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-20 00:07:10 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
612faa8868 feat: imlemented new hard-fork mechanism that uses MN Activation Height
Altough, it's still disabled because no calls of related methods after processing MnEHF tx
2023-10-06 11:02:15 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
04a31c76e0
chore: harden dip 20 and 24 activation (#5344)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We had forgotten to harden dip20 and dip24 activation

## What was done?
Hardened dip20 and dip24 activation

## How Has This Been Tested?
Hasn't yet; should do an assumevalid=0 reindex

## Breaking Changes
Hopefully none

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-17 14:11:33 +03:00
MarcoFalke
a84ec5cc19 Merge #16726: tests: Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable dict/list:s are used as default parameter values
e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1 lint: Catch use of [] or {} as default parameter values in Python functions (practicalswift)
25dd86715039586d92176eee16e9c6644d2547f0 Avoid using mutable default parameter values (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable `dict`/`list`:s are used as default parameter values.

  Examples of this gotcha caught during review:
  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16673#discussion_r317415261
  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14565#discussion_r241942304

  Perhaps surprisingly this is how mutable list and dictionary default parameter values behave in Python:

  ```
  >>> def f(i, j=[], k={}):
  ...     j.append(i)
  ...     k[i] = True
  ...     return j, k
  ...
  >>> f(1)
  ([1], {1: True})
  >>> f(1)
  ([1, 1], {1: True})
  >>> f(2)
  ([1, 1, 2], {1: True, 2: True})
  ```

  In contrast to:

  ```
  >>> def f(i, j=None, k=None):
  ...     if j is None:
  ...         j = []
  ...     if k is None:
  ...         k = {}
  ...     j.append(i)
  ...     k[i] = True
  ...     return j, k
  ...
  >>> f(1)
  ([1], {1: True})
  >>> f(1)
  ([1], {1: True})
  >>> f(2)
  ([2], {2: True})
  ```

  The latter is typically the intended behaviour.

  This PR fixes two instances of this and adds a check guarding against this gotcha going forward :-)

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    Oh Python... ACK e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1. Testing tip: swap the two commits.

Tree-SHA512: 56e14d24fc866211a20185c9fdb274ed046c3aed2dc0e07699e58b6f9fa3b79f6d0c880fb02d72b7fe5cc5eb7c0ff6da0ead33123344e1a872209370c2e49e3f
2023-04-04 12:45:27 -05:00
UdjinM6
498e8c5017 chore: run copyright_header.py update 2023-01-13 00:49:04 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
baa5106c0c
feat: adjust delays and pull intervals to speed up functional tests (#5091)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This should speed up test `feature_llmq_data_recovery.py` for 30% from
500+ seconds to ~350 seconds (running locally) and all other tests that
uses any quorum, such as `feature_llmq_simplepose.py`

Time of CI running is also decreased noticeable 168min -> 131min
21 jobs for
[pr-5091/knst/dash/functional-tests-delays](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/commits/pr-5091/knst/dash/functional-tests-delays)
in 131 minutes and 20 seconds (queued for 4 seconds)
vs some other pull request:
23 jobs for
[pr-5100/UdjinM6/dash/fix_GetStateFor_perf](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/commits/pr-5100/UdjinM6/dash/fix_GetStateFor_perf)
in 195 minutes and 33 seconds (queued for 28 minutes and 13 seconds)

## What was done?
decreased delays in functional tests

## How Has This Been Tested?
I run several times locally and run CI/CD to see that it doesn't fail

## Breaking Changes
no breaking changes

## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2022-12-17 12:20:52 -06:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
e8bf39f2dc merge bitcoin#19967: Replace (dis)?connect_nodes globals with TestFramework methods
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-17 08:03:12 +05:30
UdjinM6
5b334b35e1
fix(tests): various fixes (#4840)
* tests: extend "age" period in `feature_llmq_connections.py`

see `NOTE`

* tests: sleep more in `wait_until` by default

Avoid overloading rpc with 20+ requests per second, 2 should be enough.

* tests: various fixes in `activate_dip0024`

- lower batch size
- no fast mode
- disable spork17 while mining
- bump mocktime on every generate call

* tests: bump mocktime on generate in `activate_dip8`

* tests: fix `reindex` option in `restart_mn`

Make sure nodes actually finished reindexing before moving any further.

* tests: trigger recovery threads and wait on mn restarts

* tests: sync blocks in `wait_for_quorum_data`

* tests: bump disconnect timeouts in `p2p_invalid_messages.py`

1 is too low for busy nodes

* tests: Wait for addrv2 processing before bumping mocktime in p2p_addrv2_relay.py

* tests: use `timeout_scale` option in `get_recovered_sig` and `isolate_node`

* tests: fix `wait_for...`s

* tests: fix `close_mn_port` banning test

* Bump MASTERNODE_SYNC_RESET_SECONDS to 900

This helps to avoid issues with 10m+ bump_mocktime on isolated nodes in feature_llmq_is_retroactive.py and feature_llmq_simplepose.py.

* style: fix extra whitespace

Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-12 20:36:17 +03:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
282b02e6b2
rpc: split spork manipulation logic to distinct "sporkupdate" call (#4885)
* rpc: split spork manipulation logic to distinct "sporkupdate" call

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: add release notes for dash#4885

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-06-18 19:52:45 +03:00
UdjinM6
5cdd67ed53
tests: Use wait_for_chainlocked_block_all_nodes in more places (#4139) 2021-05-11 18:55:40 +02:00
UdjinM6
7616b04cb2
Rename bit 6 from "v17" to "dip0020" (#4142) 2021-05-07 18:36:30 +02:00
dustinface
4feb38b6ab
llmq|init|test: Add "mode" to -llmq-qvvec-sync parameter (#4030)
* llmq|init|test: Add "mode" to -llmq-qvvec-sync parameter

This changes the paramter from `-llmq-qvvec-sync=<quorum_name>` to `-llmq-qvvec-sync=<quorum_name:mode>`

With the following definitions:

- `quorum_name`: Internal name of the quorum type
- `mode=0` - Sync always from all quorums of the type defined by `quorum_name`
- `mode=1` - Sync only if member of any from all other quorum of the type defined by `quorum_name`

`-llmq-qvvec-sync=llmq_100_67:0` To always request qvvec's from all `LLMQ_100_67`.
`-llmq-qvvec-sync=llmq_100_67:1` Only request if type member.

This means, if platform enables this on all MNs with `mode=0` we will
have all nodes asking new quorum for their verification vector instead
of only `24*100` at max.

* llmq: Adjust GetQuorumRecoveryStartOffset to use all MNs

* Turn `QvvecSyncMode` into `enum class`

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-03-16 18:50:41 -04:00
dustinface
d6c6174958
llmq|init|test: Implement DKG data recovery / quorum verification vector sync (#3964)
* llmq: Implement automated DKG recovery threads

* llmq: Implement quorum verification vector sync

* init: Validiate quorum data recovery related command line parameter

* test: Add quorum_data_request_timeout_seconds in DashTestFramework

* test: Test quorum data recovery in feature_llmq_data_recovery.py

* test: Add feature_llmq_data_recovery.py to BASE_SCRIPTS

* test: Fix quorum_data_request_expiration_timeout in wait_for_quorum_data

* test: Always test the existence of secretKeyShare in test_mn_quorum_data

With this change it also validates that "secretKeyShare" is not in `quorum_info` if its not expected to be in there. Before this was basically just not tested.

* llmq|test: Use bool as argument type for -llmq-data-recovery

* llmq: Always set nTimeLastSuccess to 0

* test: Set -llmq-data-recovery=0 in p2p_quorum_data.py

* test: Simplify test_mns

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor: pass CQuorumCPtr to StartQuorumDataRecoveryThread

* test: Fix thread name in comment

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-02-01 17:10:19 +01:00