da73f1513a637a9f347b64de66564d6cdb2541f8 qt: Fix shutdown when waitfor* cmds are called from RPC console (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (7eed413e72a236b6f1475a198f7063fd24929e23), if the GUI has been started with`-server=1`, `bitcoin-qt` hangs on shutdown during calling any of the `waitfor*` commands in the GUI RPC console.
This PR suggests minimal changes to fix this bug.
Fix#17495
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK da73f1513a637a9f347b64de66564d6cdb2541f8
Tree-SHA512: 469f5332945a5f2c57d19336cda5df79b123ccc494aea6d58a85eb1293be52708b2b9c5bb6bc2c402a90b7b4e9e8d7ab8fe84cf201cf7ce612c9290c57e43681
99402584d7 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25332: build: test for timingsafe_bcmp (laanwj)
ca4b0fe4d6 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25320: util: modify Win32LockedPageAllocator to query windows for limit. (laanwj)
edaf9cc646 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25359: doc: add distcc to productivity notes (laanwj)
c1fa5a0f15 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25312: test: Fix port collisions caused by p2p_getaddr_caching.py (MacroFake)
aaa83ae043 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25165: doc: Explain squashing with merge commits (laanwj)
ef13101d2b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25210: doc: remove misleading AreInputsStandard() comment (laanwj)
0a847fd980 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25046: build: Fix `libmultiprocess` cross-compiling to Linux hosts (fanquake)
82eec21fee Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24754: build: specify cmake build dir for multiprocess depends build (fanquake)
a91512e1d4 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24574: test: Actually print TSan tracebacks (fanquake)
2e01c11146 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#568: options: flip listenonion to false if not listening (Hennadii Stepanov)
200d2d58dc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24385: build: remove boost dep from libmultiprocess (MarcoFalke)
28ed1a23ac Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24316: ci: Rename Cirrus CI osx_instance to macos_instance (MarcoFalke)
8d3eceacc0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23130: doc: Revert "Remove outdated comments" and place comment correctly (W. J. van der Laan)
5fbdfa1163 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23094: doc: Remove outdated comments (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Small batch of trivial backports
## What was done?
_Describe your changes in detail_
## How Has This Been Tested?
Previous versions had been build and tested locally I believe. Please wait for CI
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 0e3cfb7aab0a6373cf4167ae18849262fc4a5a62c0d301f558c7efd7c5db5a18e025aec0eba7b642829b2102133f92eda15aa5263319c65d158c2dd1506a13a2
1cb42aeda37f4979923cd7e1c85febe994480de6 util: modify Win32LockedPageAllocator to query windows for limit (Oskar Mendel)
Pull request description:
This PR resolves a todo within the Win32LockedPageAllocator: `// TODO is there a limit on Windows, how to get it?`.
The idea is to use the Windows API to get the limits like the posix based allocator does with `getrlimit`.
I use [GetProcessWorkingSetSize](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/memoryapi/nf-memoryapi-getprocessworkingsetsize) to perform this task and fallback to `return std::numeric_limits<size_t>::max();` just like the posix implementation does.
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK 1cb42aeda37f4979923cd7e1c85febe994480de6.
Tree-SHA512: 7bdd8a57a4e64ee59d752417a519656e03526878462060753be4dce481eff4889fb5edc1bdbd575b707d9b2dfe255c87da9ef67baac97de9ac5e70a04c852081
14093d5d243f6eb9cfef721c80f92848d95032ee doc: add distcc to productivity notes (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
If you have more than one computer at your disposal, you can use [distcc](https://www.distcc.org) to speed up compilation.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 14093d5d243f6eb9cfef721c80f92848d95032ee
brunoerg:
ACK 14093d5d243f6eb9cfef721c80f92848d95032ee
w0xlt:
ACK 14093d5d24
Tree-SHA512: 2c436bdea5ab750330055778eb5817361d16b046f219d53692577439e2fd8403febf78ac8e8b20ed158c650c76252b50cfc91f4ec8375cdd522cc408068d547b
ea54ba2f42f6d0b23570c665c2369f977bf55cf6 [test] Fix port collisions caused by p2p_getaddr_caching.py (dergoegge)
f9682e75ac184a62c7e29287882df34c25303033 [test_framework] Set PortSeed.n directly after initialising params (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes the issue mentioned [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25096#discussion_r892558783), to avoid port collisions between nodes spun up by the test framework.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec9159f0af90db636f7889d664c24e1430cf2bcb3c02a9ab2dcfe531b2a4d18f6e3a0f8ba73071bdf2f7db518df9d5d86a9cd06695e67644d20fe4515fac32b7
fa2d226ac950d8b4f7e430732f13ad408c504745 doc: Explain squashing with merge commits (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This avoids having to explain it in each thread
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa2d226ac950d8b4f7e430732f13ad408c504745
Tree-SHA512: e1533ee7c0ab0101c78aaebed97dc889b5eb941cf4c2dfbabbb5f0ec1bb7b1313a1a2e2405235d68c761f039373cebac67ce691a72c820a9252429d50c1ac7d5
be6d4315c150646cf672778e9232f086403e95df doc: remove misleading AreInputsStandard() comment (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This check isn't any longer just about bad pay-to-script-hash inputs; it
also excludes any kind of nonstandard input, unknown witness versions,
coinbases, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK be6d4315c150646cf672778e9232f086403e95df
dunxen:
ACK be6d431
jonatack:
ACK be6d4315c150646cf672778e9232f086403e95df
Tree-SHA512: 1c4befadff6a7b5789901ca2a2cc39adc35c688f7e3c093ab5292123f9193ce078731016b773b3d05f7004ff01ee62f23f8362ae8d05134d41dc097ba094a42b
c0f5cc14ef9fae2b2de4222ee061729629ebb6b4 build: Fix `libmultiprocess` cross-compiling to Linux hosts (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
To successfully call the [`capnp_generate_cpp()`](d576d975de/CMakeLists.txt (L45)) function, the `libmultiprocess` build system must be provided with paths to the native `capnp` and `capnpc-c++` tools.
This [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24387#issuecomment-1054776195) points the same:
> I think `packages/libmultiprocess.mk` probably needs to be passing a `-DCAPNP_EXECUTABLE=.../depends/arm-linux-gnueabihf/native/bin/capnp` argument to cmake. Also the package should have dependencies on both `capnp` and `native_capnp`.
Fixesbitcoin/bitcoin#24387.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c0f5cc14ef9fae2b2de4222ee061729629ebb6b4
Tree-SHA512: 2986d8bf98d2761eceba21b1897145c5185a0922d4c2084e8812d4d07dc94237e5c2809036641c4f7c491a3414727fff328cba91ce138b89e37ec5cba61d8f61
7c218dacd0e9602b8f755be42e96c49706f96305 build: specify cmake build dir for multiprocess depends build (fanquake)
Pull request description:
When no build dir is specified, cmake will warn:
```bash
Preprocessing libmultiprocess...
Configuring libmultiprocess...
CMake Warning:
No source or binary directory provided. Both will be assumed to be the
same as the current working directory, but note that this warning will
become a fatal error in future CMake releases.
```
It's unclear if this will actually ever become an error, but it's also easy
enough to just supply the directory, and save this maybe breaking in
future.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7c218dacd0e9602b8f755be42e96c49706f96305. I guess the purpose of the warning is to encourage people not to build in the source directory, but reasons for encouraging this don't really apply to the depends build system, so it is appropriate to disable the warning.
hebasto:
ACK 7c218dacd0e9602b8f755be42e96c49706f96305, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
Tree-SHA512: 6904f2095fe62cead4abc644ec888c5d836e54a3c0b2a84c467029116e5d14eba35190570acaa23c6831aed9a4a65898134480cc46cdb141279ec0dc6f534d5f
fa76d8d4d71d844e217686881d4f630eac3a8e10 test: Actually print TSan tracebacks (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Commit 5e5138a721738f47053d915e4c65f925838ad5b4 made the TSan logs to be printed before returning an error from the ci script.
However, it seems that on Cirrus CI, the `--failfast` option will kill not only all python process and bitcoind child process, but also the parent CI bash script, rendering the `trap` inefficient. I believe this bug was introduced in commit 451b96f7d2796d00eabaec56d831f9e9b1a569cc.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
utACK fa76d8d4d71d844e217686881d4f630eac3a8e10
Tree-SHA512: 686f889d38a343882cb62ad6e0c2080196330e7cc7086891a7ff66d9443b455c82ba8d7e4a5cc42daa0513b0ad2743055bfe90e2f6ac88a910ee3b663fabddcd
7f90dc26c8938f348938929b6d8bf1ea6f149209 options: flip listenonion to false if not listening (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If the user has unchecked "Allow incoming connections" in
`Settings->Options...->Network` then `fListen=false` is saved in
`~/.config/Bitcoin/Bitcoin-Qt.conf`. This flips `-listen` to `false`
during startup, but leaves `-listenonion` to `true`.
This flipping of `-listen` is done in `OptionsModel::Init()` after
`InitParameterInteraction()` has been executed which would have flipped
`-listenonion`, should it have seen `-listen` being `false`
(this is a difference between `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt`).
Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/567
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 7f90dc26c8938f348938929b6d8bf1ea6f149209
hebasto:
ACK 7f90dc26c8938f348938929b6d8bf1ea6f149209
jonatack:
utACK 7f90dc26c8938f348938929b6d8bf1ea6f149209
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7f90dc26c8938f348938929b6d8bf1ea6f149209.
Tree-SHA512: ff5095096858eae696293dc58d1cd5bd1bb60ef7c5d07d87308a0cf71c67da88cc00b301b550704625f136c4ba3a29905a934a766535a6422fe85d9662299d32
07dcf1a76e34a6f7c919e7d5c57fa61caea6007b build: remove boost dep from libmultiprocess (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Looks like this hasn't been needed since https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess/pull/25 and was just missed in #19160.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 07dcf1a76e34a6f7c919e7d5c57fa61caea6007b. Should probably wait for GUIX build results, but I think this should be fine
hebasto:
ACK 07dcf1a76e34a6f7c919e7d5c57fa61caea6007b
Tree-SHA512: 7988efd4aaf6ad512d60cfd33f350df56090daf88aac3aed2a1d400e80bc723dc27d27f5fa5d75359f9fae60d04b87d4b120d4e79e3079df8631956ab6c3b83c
8ff3743f5e99c693710bc446bfd595687156ca6b Revert "doc: Remove outdated comments" (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately, in #23094 the assumption that #14336 makes comments outdated is wrong. As pointed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23094#discussion_r717226839, the #14336 just moved the relevant code a few lines down.
This PR reverts commit ee7891a0c412728cf8bec667f25263682a9baaaf, and moves the comments into the right place.
I apologize about that.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 8ff3743f5e99c693710bc446bfd595687156ca6b
laanwj:
ACK 8ff3743f5e99c693710bc446bfd595687156ca6b
Tree-SHA512: 84aca627bb5b49c06fc172778f9b9407482c5a873ccbc3dc40167e6a8ad0bc60475d6a469c843b7b42712e35cf3fc2d3518923e791d5e0c59628e042acc72747
ee7891a0c412728cf8bec667f25263682a9baaaf doc: Remove outdated comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The first removed comment was introduced in #5288, the second one in #13503.
Both are outdated since #14336.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
crACK ee7891a0
Tree-SHA512: a2d6071919e81c916bfc2178109bbc464417321bcc567ed0644448c5faea8e58cb08a7657afa1b6ffe1fb63e114a2a47b31c893e471839ba9d49a3986e68b2a7
## What was done?
Happy new year and happy new lunar year!
2024 is here and 20.1 is coming.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
6c07c2c80c Merge #19858: Periodically make block-relay connections and sync headers (MarcoFalke)
5e23f3506c Merge #20561: p2p: periodically clear m_addr_known (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
6abbbe12c7 Merge #20138: net: Assume that SetCommonVersion is called at most once per peer (MarcoFalke)
5154fa0ebf Merge #19847: rpc, refactor: Avoid duplicate set lookup in gettxoutproof (Jonas Schnelli)
ea828164e6 Merge #18948: qt: Call setParent() in the parent's context (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Bitcoin Backports
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 369ce49a510b77d05aeeb50612ff827b0c994a1511ff72dadeb71f6a115a9624b0d08292119ba8387b71e4ba7b679c6ce23aba03ac8f849f68ed93f6d061f29e
b3a515c0bec97633a76bec101af47c3c90c0b749 Clarify comments around outbound peer eviction (Suhas Daftuar)
daffaf03fbede6c01287779e464379ee3acb005a Periodically make block-relay connections and sync headers (Suhas Daftuar)
3cc8a7a0f5fa183cd7f0cf5e56f16f9a9d1f2441 Use conn_type to identify block-relay peers, rather than m_tx_relay == nullptr (Suhas Daftuar)
91d61952a82af3e8887e8ae532ecc19d87fe9073 Simplify and clarify extra outbound peer counting (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
To make eclipse attacks more difficult, regularly initiate outbound connections
and stay connected long enough to sync headers and potentially learn of new
blocks. If we learn a new block, rotate out an existing block-relay peer in
favor of the new peer.
This augments the existing outbound peer rotation that exists -- currently we
make new full-relay connections when our tip is stale, which we disconnect
after waiting a small time to see if we learn a new block. As block-relay
connections use minimal bandwidth, we can make these connections regularly and
not just when our tip is stale.
Like feeler connections, these connections are not aggressive; whenever our
timer fires (once every 5 minutes on average), we'll try to initiate a new
block-relay connection as described, but if we fail to connect we just wait for
our timer to fire again before repeating with a new peer.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK b3a515c, only change since last time is dropping a useless `cs_main` taking. I manually tested a previous version of the PR, and not substantial change has been introduced since then which would alter behavior IMO.
jonatack:
Tested ACK b3a515c0bec97633a76bec101af47c3c90c0b749 over several weeks, though this change and behavior could benefit from test coverage and other follow-ups (refactoring, etc.) described in the review feedback. I did not verify the behavior of `m_start_extra_block_relay_peers` only being enabled after initial chain sync. Since my last review, one unneeded `cs_main` lock was removed.
Tree-SHA512: 75fc6f8e8003e88e93f86b845caf2d30b8b9c0dbb0a6b8aabe4e24ea4f6327351f736a068a3b2720a8a581b789942a3a47f921e2afdb47e88bc50d078aa37b6f
65273fa0e74f0c11dfbf0645dd962bdc779ea558 Clear m_addr_known before our periodic self-advertisement (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
We use a rolling bloom filter to track which addresses we've previously sent a peer, but after #7125 we no longer clear it every day before our own announcement. This looks to me like an oversight which has the effect of reducing the frequency with which we actually self-announce our own address, so this reintroduces resetting that filter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 65273fa0e74f0c11dfbf0645dd962bdc779ea558
laanwj:
Code review ACK 65273fa0e74f0c11dfbf0645dd962bdc779ea558
sipa:
utACK 65273fa0e74f0c11dfbf0645dd962bdc779ea558
Tree-SHA512: 602c155fb6d2249b054fcb6f1c0dd17143605ceb87132286bbd90babf26d258ff6c41f9925482c17e2be41805d33f9b83926cb447f394969ffecd4bccfa0a64f
fa0f4157098ea68169ced44730986d0ed2c3a5aa net: Assume that SetCommonVersion is called at most once per peer (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This restores the check removed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17785#discussion_r503224381
Instead of using `error`, which was used previously, it uses a newly introduced `Assume()`. `error` had several issues:
* It logs unconditionally to the debug log
* It doesn't abort the program when the error is hit in tests
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa0f4157098ea68169ced44730986d0ed2c3a5aa: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK fa0f4157098ea68169ced44730986d0ed2c3a5aa
Tree-SHA512: cd7424a9485775e8c7093b725f8f52a90d47485185e79bac80f7810e450d0b3fda608d8805e9239094929f7bad2dca3fe772fb78ae606c2399d15405521e136b
8963b2c71f120b2746396c4987392f0105c8dd60 qt: Improve comments in WalletController::getOrCreateWallet() (Hennadii Stepanov)
5fcfee68af47d4a891ae9c9964d73886f0f01d7d qt: Call setParent() in the parent's context (Hennadii Stepanov)
5659e73493fcdfb5d0cb9d686c24c4fbe1c217ed qt: Add ObjectInvoke template function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The `setParent(parent)` internally calls `QCoreApplication::sendEvent(parent, QChildEvent)` that implies running in the thread which created the parent object. That is not the case always, and an internal assertion fails in the debug mode.
Steps to reproduce this issue on master (007e15dcd7f8b42501e31cc36343655c53027077) on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64):
```
$ make -C depends DEBUG=1
$ CONFIG_SITE=$PWD/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/share/config.site ./configure
$ make
$ QT_FATAL_WARNINGS=1 lldb src/qt/bitcoin-qt -- --regtest -debug=qt
(lldb) target create "src/qt/bitcoin-qt"
Current executable set to '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt' (x86_64).
(lldb) settings set -- target.run-args "--regtest" "-debug=qt"
(lldb) run
Process 431562 launched: '/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt' (x86_64)
# load wallet via GUI
Process 431562 stopped
* thread #24, name = 'QThread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
frame #0: 0x00007ffff794518b libc.so.6`__GI_raise(sig=2) at raise.c:51:1
(lldb) bt
* thread #24, name = 'QThread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
* frame #0: 0x00007ffff794518b libc.so.6`__GI_raise(sig=2) at raise.c:51:1
frame #1: 0x00007ffff7924859 libc.so.6`__GI_abort at abort.c:79:7
frame #2: 0x0000555556508ec4 bitcoin-qt`::qt_message_fatal((null)=<unavailable>, context=<unavailable>, message=<unavailable>) at qlogging.cpp:1690:15
frame #3: 0x00005555565099cf bitcoin-qt`QMessageLogger::fatal(this=<unavailable>, msg=<unavailable>) const at qlogging.cpp:796:21
frame #4: 0x000055555650479d bitcoin-qt`qt_assert_x(where=<unavailable>, what=<unavailable>, file=<unavailable>, line=<unavailable>) at qglobal.cpp:3088:46
frame #5: 0x0000555556685733 bitcoin-qt`QCoreApplicationPrivate::checkReceiverThread(receiver=0x0000555557b27510) at qcoreapplication.cpp:557:5
frame #6: 0x00005555567ced86 bitcoin-qt`QApplication::notify(this=0x00007fffffffd4a0, receiver=0x0000555557b27510, e=0x00007fff9a7f8ce0) at qapplication.cpp:2956:27
frame #7: 0x0000555556685d31 bitcoin-qt`QCoreApplication::notifyInternal2(receiver=0x0000555557b27510, event=0x00007fff9a7f8ce0) at qcoreapplication.cpp:1024:24
frame #8: 0x00005555566c9224 bitcoin-qt`QObjectPrivate::setParent_helper(QObject*) [inlined] QCoreApplication::sendEvent(event=<unavailable>, receiver=<unavailable>) at qcoreapplication.h:233:59
frame #9: 0x00005555566c9210 bitcoin-qt`QObjectPrivate::setParent_helper(this=0x00007fff85855260, o=0x0000555557b27510) at qobject.cpp:2036
frame #10: 0x00005555566c9b41 bitcoin-qt`QObject::setParent(this=<unavailable>, parent=<unavailable>) at qobject.cpp:1980:24
frame #11: 0x0000555555710be8 bitcoin-qt`WalletController::getOrCreateWallet(std::unique_ptr<interfaces::Wallet, std::default_delete<interfaces::Wallet> >) + 2534
...
```
Fixes#18835.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8963b2c71f120b2746396c4987392f0105c8dd60. No changes since last review, just rebase because of conflict on some adjacent lines
jonasschnelli:
utACK 8963b2c71f120b2746396c4987392f0105c8dd60
Tree-SHA512: fef615904168717df3d8a0bd85eccc3eef990cc3e66c9fa280c8ef08ea009a7cb5a2a4f868ed0be3c0fe5bf683e8465850b5958deb896fdadd22d296186c9586
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Avoid locking cs_main in high volume call locations; I'm not fully sure
the removal in signature_shares.cpp is okay; but it compiles.
## What was done?
Removed or reduced scope
## How Has This Been Tested?
Running with enable-debug
## Breaking Changes
Should be done
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
On my local kubuntu linters have way too much spam
## What was done?
See each commit
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run locally. Amount of warnings decreased from thousands to fewer
amount. Excluding typos, they are:
```
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:1420:5: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:1426:5: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:655:26: warning: Consider using std::copy_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/server.cpp:593:33: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/server.cpp:630:106: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1057:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1068:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1079:13: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1086:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1094:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1099:5: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1486:34: warning: Consider using std::copy_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/commitment.cpp:102:5: warning: Consider using std::all_of or std::none_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/instantsend.cpp:820:38: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:831:102: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/quorums.h:300:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:301:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:302:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:303:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/spork.cpp:119:58: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/statsd_client.cpp:234:63: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
Advice not applicable in this specific case? Add an exception by updating
IGNORED_WARNINGS in test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
Consider install flake8-cached for cached flake8 results.
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: error: Source file found twice under different module names: "invalid_txs" and "data.invalid_txs"
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: note: See https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html#mapping-file-paths-to-modules for more info
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: note: Common resolutions include: a) adding `__init__.py` somewhere, b) using `--explicit-package-bases` or adjusting MYPYPATH
Found 1 error in 1 file (errors prevented further checking)
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-python.s
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Use string view where possible
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
Co-authored-by: laanwj <126646+laanwj@users.noreply.github.com>
These changes were introduced in bitcoin#15514 (Update Transifex links),
which ordinarily do not apply to Dash as it uses its own Transifex
account but not mentioned in the name are updates to Doxygen URLs.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Help field showed wrong type
## What was done?
Changed height to number instead of string
## How Has This Been Tested?
Locally
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix failures like https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/6175160403
## What was done?
use `minimumAmount` option in `listunspent` rpc call to avoid picking
coins that are too small for asset lock txes
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `feature_asset_locks.py`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We did not previously ship any onion seeds. This results in people
needing to use `addnode` in order to actually get connected
## What was done?
Modified seed creation process to handle a list of onion seeds.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Running with and without onlynet=onion and with dnsseed=0 and deleting
peers.dat
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
edd0313ae7c94420642081c9172e349080bb9335 test: Improve "invalid_command" subtest in system_tests for Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
fb1b0590af138e317803893d2cab9dc887f33c5b test: Fix "non-zero exit code" subtest in system_tests for Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
0aad33db6410ed36fa0f4b96245cacbae7897d2e test: Fix "false" subtest in system_tests for Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
507c009c1ee68a4c3ad100f765bf854307d5bf39 test: Fix "echo" subtest in the system_tests for Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
An attempt to fixbitcoin/bitcoin#23775.
With this PR on Windows 10 Pro 21H1 (build 19043.1348):
```
C:\Users\hebasto\bitcoin>src\test_bitcoin.exe --run_test=system_tests/run_command
Running 1 test case...
*** No errors detected
C:\Users\hebasto\bitcoin>src\test_bitcoin.exe
Running 482 test cases...
*** No errors detected
```
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK edd0313ae7c94420642081c9172e349080bb9335
Tru3Nrg:
tACK edd0313ae7
Tree-SHA512: 66a4f2372858011ff862b71c6530bedb8bc731b18595636fac9affc9189d9320f212c68b62498f2b57ee7a07f59e842dbec085b76a7419791d1a06c8e80e7744
faa5fa9a78d6d23b4e9adea07fdfb34ead170a2f fuzz: Use LIMITED_WHILE instead of limit_max_ops (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This avoids the local stack variable `limit_max_ops` and makes it easier to grep for limited loops. Also, it is less code.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK faa5fa9a78d6d23b4e9adea07fdfb34ead170a2f 🍷
Zero-1729:
crACK faa5fa9a78d6d23b4e9adea07fdfb34ead170a2f 🥤
Tree-SHA512: b10d89f4ce57bac0d6e9de9db7d4db85bae81bc02536d46a910be8c0e77333f2d9a547c7fe03df57f5ff9fd90b6994b09996d8e148573fb7ecd840d08b5c0c7d
fa35efa84bb614df9629076e45e9e974d9e940f6 ci: Run arm task on arm64 hardware (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It will still run cross-compilation to armhf, but run the binaries on the hardware itself, not qemu.
There shouldn't be any significant difference, other than maybe a slight speedup.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK fa35efa84bb614df9629076e45e9e974d9e940f6
Tree-SHA512: d03bb2b55d0a6b5021243eedff6e143f4fad03a1a8913000c2c5c74665e4bb1c77cb30aa112dbddbc0bb7c645bec18f6b8b8ba91049587b464bbe5ec07dd46bd
