fa7238300c18938cdf627cacfc58d4b81602417f fuzz: Limit fuzzed time to years 2000-2100 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It doesn't make sense to fuzz times in the past, as Bitcoin Core will refuse to start in the past.
Fix that and also remove a sanitizer suppression, which would be hit in net_processing in `ProcessMessage`:
```cpp
if (addr.nTime <= 100000000 || addr.nTime > nNow + 10 * 60)
addr.nTime = nNow - 5 * 24 * 60 * 60; // <-- Here
```
This changes the format of fuzz inputs. Previously a time value was (de)serialized as 40 bytes, now it is 32 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK fa7238300c18938cdf627cacfc58d4b81602417f
Tree-SHA512: ca6e7233beec2d9ef9fd481d8f1331942a4d2c8fe518b857629bebcc53a4f42ae123b994cf5d359384a0a8022098ff5a9c146600bc2593c6d88734e25bc240ad
fa7da227daf8558be14f226c4366583fdc59ba10 refactor: Fix implicit-signed-integer-truncation in cuckoocache.h (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using a file-wide suppression for this implicit truncation has several issues:
* It is file-wide, thus suppressing any other (newly introduced) issues
* The file doesn't compile with `-Wimplicit-int-conversion`
Fix both issues by making the truncation explicit.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa7da227daf8558be14f226c4366583fdc59ba10
Tree-SHA512: bf2076ed94c4e80d0d29ff883080edc7a73144c73d6d3e872ec87966177ee3160f4760fc4c774aaa6fb591f4acee450a24b0f7c82291e0bef96582a6d134046e
fae5fec0fec851568a72724000193b2747c30414 test: Remove sanitizer suppression implicit-signed-integer-truncation:netaddress.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts commit fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e.
This was fixed in commit efd6f904c78769ad2e93c1f1de43014d284e7561.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK fae5fec0fec851568a72724000193b2747c30414
Tree-SHA512: 3bebf1babd5c68cbb2506bcab9b8e9ffed8697213cf66190484748741f05c59b847a103be171360f7fd6ddb57dfd86ed34a123f72860b76e533ed46bb53a4852
fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e test: Add temporary sanitizer suppression implicit-signed-integer-truncation:netaddress.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is required to unbreak the fuzzers while a fix is being worked on.
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4787303177519104?logs=ci#L3020
```
netaddress.cpp:1190:18: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value -1 (32-bit, signed) to type 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char') changed the value to 255 (8-bit, unsigned)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e
tryphe:
untested ACK fa865287e5f35e0a376785834e966dd202d2959e
lsilva01:
ACK fa865287e5
Tree-SHA512: 4a54ec68c014c7a4c9ab268c3a04321db5eb9b2857646b41406d8d4908a3d349848b4549e80aea6afd9a0c3639522a48fe578527139519b12439eae9f0c4c46c
fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4 Reject invalid coin height and output index when loading assumeutxo (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It should be impossible to have a coin at a height higher than the height of the snapshot block, so reject those early to avoid integer wraparounds and hash collisions later on.
Same for the outpoint index.
Both issues were found by fuzzing:
* The height issue by OSS-Fuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793
* The outpoint issue by my fuzz server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793#c2
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4: patch looks correct
jamesob:
crACK fa9ebedec3
theStack:
Code review ACK fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4
benthecarman:
crACK fa9ebedec3f982bb5bb459ea33d74c94d9b5cec4
Tree-SHA512: dae7caee4b3862b23ebdf2acb7edec4baf75b0dbf1409b370b1a73aa6b632b317ebfac596dcbaf4edfb1301b513f45465ea75328962460f35e2af0d7e547c9ac
faca40ec68a25180f90a5b9ef017f931354d5bc6 test: Add temporary coinstats suppressions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Needed for my fuzzer to continue to run
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faca40ec68a25180f90a5b9ef017f931354d5bc6: suppression looks necessary (temporarily)
Tree-SHA512: 5bdff9a24a60546cfe31e775fa2aa5e238aefda2ed2604bef18c82b1b80c51ca3cbe058d6c7988fa75305258b70076036a3e430b9b7de13a111309fa7a66745b
575792e6ffe23c8236a1f8431f6be445e448809b fuzz: Add -fsanitize=integer suppression needed for RPC fuzzer (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add `-fsanitize=integer` suppression needed for RPC fuzzer (`generateblock`).
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/59/checks?check_run_id=2494624259
```
miner.cpp:130:21: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int64_t' (aka 'long') of value 244763573890 (64-bit, signed) to type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') changed the value to 4245405314 (32-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x56143974eaf3 in BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(CScript const&) miner.cpp:130:21
#1 0x56143993690d in generateblock()::$_4::operator()(RPCHelpMan const&, JSONRPCRequest const&) const rpc/mining.cpp:370:127
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
> review ACK [575792e](575792e6ff), but this function shouldn't be called by the rpc fuzzer, at least not without sanitizing num_blocks
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 575792e6ffe23c8236a1f8431f6be445e448809b
Tree-SHA512: c2133d1064bf17df0e7749ef4a0f7664b5c8082040491a1035d39f0c6e5d96997b347ef2354411e285c7f1f973e34515f1c3c88eb3de60fab64ca4d2adf6dd74
fae196147bae11202c0d54543dc12ba5d92ab0cc doc: Clarify that feerates are per virtual size (MarcoFalke)
fa83e95ac6f318caa38016a08fa4e402c3b05833 scripted-diff: Clarify that feerates are per virtual size (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
By implementing segwit, it is already clear that all feerates in Bitcoin Core are denoted in (amount/virtual size). Though, there is inconsistency, as some places use kvB, some use kB. Thus, replace all with "kvB".
See also commit 6da3afbaee5809ebf6d88efaa3958c505c2d71c7, which did the replacement for wallet RPCs.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fae196147bae11202c0d54543dc12ba5d92ab0cc. Checked instances where units were being added in the second commit and they all looked right.
Tree-SHA512: ab70d13cde7d55c1ac931bddc2b45aa218fc75ef46cb6ea9e5a30b1d4dbf27889c2b6357299a6c5427912443a46ec3592a4809dae335e03162bd2120a0f7f8ad
d033cd55be partial bitcoin#26341: add BIP158 false-positive element check in rpc_scanblocks.py (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
eab94ac07b merge bitcoin#23859: Add missing suppressions for crypto_diff_fuzz_chacha20.cpp (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
0e8d4a1a95 partial bitcoin#21798: Create a block template in tx_pool targets (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ad71db2dcc merge bitcoin#21604: Document why no symbol names can be used for suppressions (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c116d8405a merge bitcoin#21599: Replace file level integer overflow suppression with function level suppression (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
8a0dc8cfa1 merge bitcoin#21586: Add missing suppression for signed-integer-overflow:txmempool.cpp (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
53cf0d5cea merge bitcoin#21000: Add UBSan suppressions needed for fuzz tests to not warn under -fsanitize=integer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5902
* [bitcoin#21586](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21586) was listed as DNM in the backports Google Sheet as listed below as it is `reverted as #23059`
![Listing of bitcoin#21586 as DNM](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/assets/63189531/413c116a-b3cb-4b58-becd-0d731b0e4b0b)
* [bitcoin#23059](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23059) actually reverts [bitcoin#22925](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22925) (which deals with `addrman.cpp`), not [bitcoin#21586](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21586) (which deals with `txmempool.cpp`).
## Breaking Changes
None, changes are limited to fuzzing, functional tests and undefined behavior exclusions
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7b6c3fcb462edc9bbcc12a0c4eab052d3ef3a6048281b162dd5650f311f6e1bae7a958adf1c03aa0dea09c56c1ddbc99d98a44023fd81f83b2325fd79dc32e80
098748ac6a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25589: test: speedup wallet_coinbase_category.py (MacroFake)
8cc7f38017 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25568: Remove my key from trusted-keys (MacroFake)
d1018ff55a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25506: Rephrase error message for invalid value of `-peertimeout` (MacroFake)
64a6f74de1 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25457: Use more specific path when including `memenv.h` header (laanwj)
581dba9914 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25451: test: `-whitebind` and `-bind` with `-listen=0` should throw an error (MacroFake)
6a8b3f2b40 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25440: log: Use consistent wording in random.cpp log (MacroFake)
6af409da1a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25425: build: Fix `::_wsystem` check (laanwj)
fa14df62bf Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25370: test: check for `getblocktxn` request with out-of-bounds tx index (MacroFake)
da4fd2eaf2 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25367: [contrib] message-capture-parser: fix out of bounds error for empty vectors (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
batch of trivial backports; small batch as a lot of them ended up causing test failures
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building locally; tests not ran
## Breaking Changes
Didn't see any yet; didn't review much yet
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: e35c74c3f93556e42803da659ded780a8c2ba60a7ae322b8e15590189ddcef47dbccbd42b195c4a09a3ba149dc53c129e0c761cd299d66a8e40b7b4bc5fd4e87
76a84c0a6cac3df711b1ed907a46c905cb85c485 test: speedup wallet_coinbase_category.py (furszy)
Pull request description:
No need to create a chain (200 extra blocks), nor use the cache, for it.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: beec64ba6c580d475e19700371ae155f4f3d74325879802da83d02f4153a752d5829b8a4ed77e0c893e79cbc26f66389eed90ac2e8b03a59f6c630ee9333355c
ceec6808d331fa082407a734cd5f3c2f1c7d11b3 test: `-whitebind` and `-bind` with `-listen=0` should throw an error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init error:
b9122e95f0/src/init.cpp (L872-L875)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK ceec6808d331fa082407a734cd5f3c2f1c7d11b3
Tree-SHA512: 03068abe7199b1235f029871ab87a3dd4943738c592ad62d82cdcd3e0201e627624960bd3ea1fc6fc1e7da4b8e215ba3393d1cb8130e1108049f764e51dc75c0
c01ae8f5ead6837162a2772ce792a83f66757ee4 Use consistent wording in log (Igor Bubelov)
Pull request description:
It's a trivial change, but it bothers me a bit that two log lines in a row aren't grammatically identical while following exactly the same pattern. I've read `contributing.md` and I'm aware that changes like this are usually being ignored and dropped, but I decided to leave it here anyway in case someone feels the same way about inconsistent log messages or grammar =)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c01ae8f5ead6837162a2772ce792a83f66757ee4
Tree-SHA512: d5b3849b3a6e3de7ea9b468c05f17cacd1dbd1aca2f3401b5138383dc8d385cea9e221db558ab472c1c4c7f6921d57dcc7af89a54776c5765fa00e429694b4e7
5a8c321444c10c7c89c4222c0b47c2d83a1a9ea4 test: check for `getblocktxn` request with out-of-bounds tx index (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `getblocktxn` message handler, in the case that any of the contained indices is out-of-bounds:
a05876619a/src/net_processing.cpp (L2180-L2183)
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
ACK 5a8c321
Tree-SHA512: 2743c2c6d8aed57b22f825aefd60ba3e670321b60625a42ea7248e7b0fc41c73e9a5945153567c02824ba3b5f0fce7f4125bffc974973fc608b6ffbe49e14b65
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
42bbbba7c83d1e2baad18b4c6f05bad1358eb117 message-capture-parser: fix out of bounds error for empty vectors (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The script [message-capture-parser.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py) currently throws an "out of bounds" error if a message containing an empty integer vector element is tried to converted to JSON (e.g. by the BIP157 message `cfcheckpt` with empty `FilterHeaders` vector):
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/./contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py", line 217, in <module>
main()
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/./contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py", line 202, in main
process_file(str(capture), messages, "recv" in capture.stem, progress_bar)
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/./contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py", line 162, in process_file
msg_dict["body"] = to_jsonable(msg)
File "/home/honey/bitcoin/./contrib/message-capture/message-capture-parser.py", line 85, in to_jsonable
elif slot in HASH_INT_VECTORS and isinstance(val[0], int):
IndexError: list index out of range
```
Fix this by using the `all(...)` predicate rather to access the first element `val[0]` (which in the error case doesn't exist).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 42bbbba7c83d1e2baad18b4c6f05bad1358eb117
Tree-SHA512: 139ec6b90304a69f26ec731e6f12b216fa10e554f777505b61adfa1e569f6861a4a849159dd1eae7a1aa0427e8598af226b6f0c4015020dcac8ab109fbc35dba
fb272dd8ff refactor: use NodeContext members instead of globals in interface logic (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
aba57cecb4 qt: add interface for CGovernanceObject querying (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
8d73cec438 refactor: reduce globals use in RPC and bench, use LLMQContext members (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e8270ca91b refactor: use NodeContext members instead of globals in RPC logic (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
2efebcac81 refactor: use aliases of globals in unit tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
89f41fa826 refactor: dereference CDeterministicMNManager instance before use (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d3dfdf353c refactor: use aliases of globals in initialization logic (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
bb7fe582f8 refactor: rename creditPoolManager to cpoolman in NodeContext, fix order (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
6f08e10540 refactor: remove extraneous creditPoolManager initialization (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d136c407d7 refactor: add aliases for Dash-specific global pointers in NodeContext (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Notes
* In some limited circumstances, we need to pass a reference to a smart pointer _before_ it is initialized. This is permissible if we know for sure that the pointer will be dereferenced _after_ it is initialized (usually, by `assert`'ing `!= nullptr`). This requires us to pass the const ref of the smart pointer object, to ensure that when dereferenced, we get access to the updated value that is set later on the initialization sequence.
This means we cannot use the bare pointer alias as an argument as it would remain `nullptr` and will not be updated.
Currently known examples are:
* `CChainState` through `ChainstateManager::InitializeChainstate`
* `llmq::CChainLocksHandler` (as `llmq::chainLocksHandler`)
* `llmq::CInstantSendManager` (as `llmq::quorumInstantSendManager`)
* `llmq::CQuorumBlockProcessor` (as `llmq::quorumBlockProcessor`)
* `CDSNotificationInterface`
* `CDeterministicMNManager` (as `deterministicMNManager`)
* `CJContext` (as `NodeContext::cj_ctx`)
* `LLMQContext` (as `NodeContext::llmq_ctx`)
* We can verify the absence of globals in GUI, interface, RPC and test logic with the commands below (the above caveat applies)
```bash
$ function make_filter() { echo "$1->|\*$1|::$1"; }
$ PROHIBITED_TERMS="$(make_filter creditPoolManager)|$(make_filter deterministicMNManager)|$(make_filter dstxManager)|$(make_filter governance)|$(make_filter mmetaman)|$(make_filter netfulfilledman)|$(make_filter sporkManager)";
$ PROHIBITED_LLMQ_TERMS="$(make_filter quorumBlockProcessor)|$(make_filter quorumManager)|$(make_filter chainLocksHandler)|$(make_filter quorumInstantSendManager)";
$ grep -E "$PROHIBITED_TERMS|$PROHIBITED_LLMQ_TERMS" src/bench/*.{cpp,h} src/node/interfaces.cpp src/qt/*.{cpp,h} src/qt/test/*.{cpp,h} src/rpc/*.{cpp,h} src/test/*.{cpp,h} src/wallet/rpc*.{cpp,h};
src/test/validation_chainstate_tests.cpp: CChainState& c1 = WITH_LOCK(cs_main, return manager.InitializeChainstate(&mempool, *m_node.mnhf_manager, *m_node.evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor));
src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp: CChainState& c1 = WITH_LOCK(::cs_main, return manager.InitializeChainstate(&mempool, *m_node.mnhf_manager, evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor));
src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp: &mempool, *m_node.mnhf_manager, evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor,
src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp: CChainState& c1 = WITH_LOCK(cs_main, return manager.InitializeChainstate(&mempool, *m_node.mnhf_manager, evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor));
src/test/validation_chainstatemanager_tests.cpp: CChainState& c2 = WITH_LOCK(cs_main, return manager.InitializeChainstate(&mempool, *m_node.mnhf_manager, evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor, GetRandHash()));
src/test/validation_flush_tests.cpp: CChainState chainstate(&mempool, blockman, *m_node.mnhf_manager, *m_node.evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor);
```
* We can also check the usage of globals in (test) initialization logic (it will also include all the actual (de)initialization logic and any usage of the bare pointer alias if the name of the global and the alias are the same, as is the case with `netfulfilledman`)
```bash
$ grep -E "$PROHIBITED_TERMS|$PROHIBITED_LLMQ_TERMS" src/init.cpp src/test/util/setup_common.cpp;
src/init.cpp: ::netfulfilledman.reset();
src/init.cpp: ::mmetaman.reset();
src/init.cpp: ::dstxManager.reset();
src/init.cpp: ::sporkManager.reset();
src/init.cpp: ::governance.reset();
src/init.cpp: assert(!::governance);
src/init.cpp: ::governance = std::make_unique<CGovernanceManager>();
src/init.cpp: node.govman = ::governance.get();
src/init.cpp: assert(!::sporkManager);
src/init.cpp: ::sporkManager = std::make_unique<CSporkManager>();
src/init.cpp: node.sporkman = ::sporkManager.get();
src/init.cpp: *node.connman, *node.mn_sync, ::deterministicMNManager, *node.govman, node.llmq_ctx, node.cj_ctx
src/init.cpp: chainman.InitializeChainstate(Assert(node.mempool.get()), *node.mnhf_manager, *node.evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor);
src/init.cpp: assert(!::dstxManager);
src/init.cpp: ::dstxManager = std::make_unique<CDSTXManager>();
src/init.cpp: node.dstxman = ::dstxManager.get();
src/init.cpp: assert(!::mmetaman);
src/init.cpp: ::mmetaman = std::make_unique<CMasternodeMetaMan>(fLoadCacheFiles);
src/init.cpp: node.mn_metaman = ::mmetaman.get();
src/init.cpp: assert(!::netfulfilledman);
src/init.cpp: ::netfulfilledman = std::make_unique<CNetFulfilledRequestManager>(fLoadCacheFiles);
src/init.cpp: node.netfulfilledman = ::netfulfilledman.get();
src/init.cpp: if (!node.netfulfilledman->IsValid()) {
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::deterministicMNManager = std::make_unique<CDeterministicMNManager>(chainstate, *node.connman, *node.evodb);
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: node.dmnman = ::deterministicMNManager.get();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::deterministicMNManager.reset();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::sporkManager = std::make_unique<CSporkManager>();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.sporkman = ::sporkManager.get();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::governance = std::make_unique<CGovernanceManager>();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.govman = ::governance.get();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::dstxManager = std::make_unique<CDSTXManager>();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.dstxman = ::dstxManager.get();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::mmetaman = std::make_unique<CMasternodeMetaMan>(/* load_cache */ false);
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.mn_metaman = ::mmetaman.get();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::netfulfilledman = std::make_unique<CNetFulfilledRequestManager>(/* load_cache */ false);
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.netfulfilledman = ::netfulfilledman.get();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::netfulfilledman.reset();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::mmetaman.reset();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::dstxManager.reset();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::governance.reset();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: ::sporkManager.reset();
src/test/util/setup_common.cpp: m_node.chainman->InitializeChainstate(m_node.mempool.get(), *m_node.mnhf_manager, *m_node.evodb, llmq::chainLocksHandler, llmq::quorumInstantSendManager, llmq::quorumBlockProcessor);
```
## Breaking Changes
None, changes are limited to refactoring and do not logically change behaviour.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f6d1a668728525e7cab7af200858a6ab6e20a24786d691630530a9019e8d2b4f474ed4358f40b76266b938dfe96420e0c64ee66a1a0986a3d3f254670162bb1c
The GetAbsoluteYesCount -> Get{Yes,No}Count -> CountMatchingVotes call
chain eventually results in needing to call GetListAtChainTip from the
CDeterministicMNManager instance.
Currently it's being accessed as a global but future deglobalization
will move fetching the CDeterministicMNList outside CGovernanceObject,
requiring an instance of CDeterministicMNManager.
In preparation of that, these changes are being made in advance.
We must pass ::deterministicMNManager to CDSNotificationInterface as
we are passing a const ref of the smart pointer object, because it is
init'ed further down the line.
The alias in NodeContext is a raw pointer that is assigned after init
and is unsuitable for this purpose.
All members within NodeContext are lower-case and the bare pointer should
be null'ed before the smart pointer is, doing it in reverse creates a
small gap where the bare pointer is directing to freed space.
creditPoolManager is already initialized in BasicTestingSetup, parent
of ChainTestingSetup. This means that creditPoolManager is being init'ed
twice, once in the parent's constructor and again in the child's
constructor.
75d81fd2c0 refactor: use atomic to avoid blocking chainlocks cs on each call to cleanup (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Avoid needing to lock CS on each call to cleanup. Cleanup only gets called once every 5 seconds it seems; but maybe that'll change in the future.
## What was done?
Make `lastCleanupTime` atomic instead of CS guarded
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 587dbfbecce430c25b4d572b2e158fcda86aced3db976c16166c0cabcf960f46d300739bbf54644def30769347cc88ac14c58d71dd78d848f7d8af562cd12bc6
a50f20d779 backport: partial Merge bitcoin-core/gui#96: Slight improve create wallet dialog (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It fixes strange behaviour of enable/disable checkboxes and checking/unchecking them
kudos to thephez to found an issue.
## What was done?
Partial backport bitcoin-core/gui#96
## How Has This Been Tested?
Build & run `dash-qt`
## Breaking Changes
No actual code changed for creating wallet, only UI for it
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7b16d33af181e44ef5b77dbb0eabb3a435e5f0b3c0a5a5c4ce17c95bb5949a5a41d605f7e6100d0f994b50edf087b777cbed6fe6d29952c2446ac9f8229f1a3a
39db1fbabb fix: adjust verify-binaries script to properly handle RCs (pasta)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Adjusted verify.py to properly handle RC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran verify on both 20.0.4 and 20.1.0-rc.1
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 894261004fb89588c8c01c67a95dd999a03657dc68895af566c8dd98deb82fbc5b5847382b052eb5a28284aba810052a5ee8d21ad3efeb9af6557302759a6e35
097a8e7196 non-scripted-diff: bump copyright year to 2023 (Konstantin Akimov)
a8e0f54e27 fix: wrong copyright for dash files (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bump copyright year to 2023-2024
## What was done?
run `copyright_header.py report` and `copyright_header.py update`
previous work: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5160/files
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please, notice, that copyrights should be updated at the end of year, not at the beginning of year for next years.
That prevent bumping year for files where is only changes in that year - bumping a copyright. This misbehavior can be validated by running `copyright_header.py update` twice. So, bump 2024 should be done in December 2024, not in 2025.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7cc2a37bd3852456fc686ed02b1cc137a9d736bbc0d3957208d9c52ae76b3233f18404f47ebf916d800fa24b7e56c32ff0324c7e0c282b0fb22c67e831ef2c9c
that's a result of:
contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
it is not scripted diff, because it works differentlly on my localhost and in CI:
CI doesn't want to use git commit date which is mocked to 30th Dec of 2023
37589507e5 feat: migrate to a CA issued certificate (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Uses a new CA issued certificate
## What was done?
Certificate changed; the issuer according to the certificate is `GoGetSSL G4 CS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA-11` In reality, the CA is digicert and the root CA is `DigiCert Trusted Root G4` and is issued to "Dash Core Group, Inc."
## How Has This Been Tested?
Signed a binary with it see: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a6577f3b8b474cfb1def1ea339795cb229b26d248d71f0b6f0b65e9e9ba3411b/details. I can share the binary if you'd like.
## Breaking Changes
Not really any; unless someone is relying on a specific certificate.
## Signature
```
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
8154f5a92ffe1124ad1573487f6e1842fe28eed7a455416c82fc6211253117ed contrib/windeploy/win-codesign.cert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=d3Bu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEYKz3C/cSZFBJ7m8V7+rxZoYiX2QFAmXWkZsACgkQ7+rxZoYi
X2QOOwf/YUm2TPXtrxOT7/CJVTITQa3u0XMwJ6JADuHtJaXlmA9b9ucz2cSKaFdC
noA1q8FFWbMUDM9+RkudAjhO5JCLMkJrfCK/mG2FlZrXV/61lounxyRdMerxk9qF
8/iJS1cf6t3tE4/SziMgo3uCZf5tsORIiNRxdEhBITVmDenPNTpKKGetijH7gr7o
lRHP5lNNPWH629eFqFtVORYiyvFOtSMV2PfG+lauBnm8DMoHIXC+Zs3lT6Soes+L
hxli9z+/ZGnQdHHIFIM+qcQNKIiEoWb4iUmsMK2couGk6beoWZNUmEpTjzubEfbN
QU252WZBsdGwQ/NEr5Gi4rNeUSfvig==
=hlUn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
```
```
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
8154f5a92ffe1124ad1573487f6e1842fe28eed7a455416c82fc6211253117ed win-codesign.cert
5dcc037bb56205a8744c99d1ba15e8fc7e64144ba3ce728ce57546d804469ea1 win-codesign.cert.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=TGa5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
```
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 36af24773bb7897332fb7703e7509903e945e6033637ec07acb6e6985dc1f05e41d51776fa4db5a7d4be012b7faa3e89e8ed3c2e8079ebb173cecf372e972397