Commit Graph

23109 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Odysseas Gabrielides
9aa886cd4d
feat!: v20 BIP9 fork (#5121)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented


## What was done?
Added v20 BIP9 style fork structure along with utility functions. 
Since several features coming depending on that fork status, we needed
to group them into one

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-14 17:01:46 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
a80c251af6
chore: bump version to v20.0.0 (#5215) 2023-04-14 17:01:04 -05:00
UdjinM6
f4eaf5a782
fix(ci): skip more jobs in "FAST_MODE" (#5311)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
CI should not be running that many jobs in "FAST_MODE"
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/.gitlab-ci.yml#L5

## What was done?
assign `.skip-in-fast-mode-template` template to more jobs

## How Has This Been Tested?
ran CI in my repo
before: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/832175740
after: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/832176325

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-14 16:56:40 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
4ab5b340ec
ci: add ci for merging into master (#5316)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This adds a check that ensures branches merge cleanly into master via a
ff-only

## What was done?
Added a GitHub action created via gpt-4 :)

## How Has This Been Tested?

https://github.com/PastaPastaPasta/dash/actions/runs/4703432752/jobs/8341923994
and
https://github.com/PastaPastaPasta/dash/actions/runs/4703457936/jobs/8341980146
for expected pass and expected fail

## Breaking Changes
None, should be back ported to v19.x branch when we get the chance.

## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-14 16:53:07 -05:00
UdjinM6
fc43fd1cdd
Merge pull request #5317 from PastaPastaPasta/merge-master-to-develop
chore: merge master into develop
2023-04-14 23:31:29 +03:00
pasta
36dc69ab17
Merge branch 'master' into develop 2023-04-14 15:25:51 -05:00
UdjinM6
b66dc270bc
Merge pull request #5315 from PastaPastaPasta/v19.x-fix-ff-only
[v19.x] chore: backport v18.2.2 into v19.x properly
2023-04-14 23:15:48 +03:00
pasta
545a486725 v18.2.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEKVkDYuyHioH9PCArUlJ77avoeYQFAmQYdeIACgkQUlJ77avo
 eYSPbxAAwcM5Uj4IJofEAyqPg0X8u102Nu4HsqgwVkteHsZS8g9tyTt9cMOWWvxA
 axUdSZk4evGLPr8Yei/FOePI8Zp7ldv98JJhYoOVy/Ivxj7gUQs0lBeK+TCyqj8s
 +cXDXi+ccRJohdlipb4BzXzxVj3VLrDh/4qAvFDtFdtF0D1DmgBt2Q25tHSePMFP
 CVf9mOWI7uOeKZAvKUDJ5ork7wmX68cyMqsfL4+D7XlP78ShHc6jRUJlQuUsdbFj
 CgKtqCDWgf2vY2GB0qLMZzT3w9DyjCm1Zis/hgbTO28MXktdLPkBgaDZMjaQfZic
 gy1Yt281uMG0EOlgdW4J8jFJlBFEU4GN6T4R9p21k3VuYaLXflKXcqVJ+WHm3U4k
 43V+yuZou58r8XXgGgwst6t3aqpAN9NsZZCa6ayzL0qpOJSTNcTu7e9Ho9hXM/Z3
 Gg401LB940ZVKXZXAe+EiOFbtjrXls7TSbTM1TQAZ0z5UeI9Ahzk3OPY4Yqw5Dmc
 5VIxyUmSVI/FN5TbkaJyBMrZWe1Q+48gpUr3maj9+KXJAXSz4j0ewE708CTA+uZJ
 4BwYZssdVWSqxBRVJPiFiYf46Ju0YqUrlk3om2FDk6egny99aKX++92TGMKUEAZP
 H5PMb5d/mTwb3F2/2ukTuKf8vyvxYCZbwB6zO5X7m6V9rfHxDJs=
 =UWCD
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
gpgsig -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEKVkDYuyHioH9PCArUlJ77avoeYQFAmQ5q5UACgkQUlJ77avo
 eYSQDA//dgXuEhSKVTEcphR6cn3bznRJQGzKOmMkKGeyDp0BUVWUKdkNLYLD9VAY
 z4J3HdmgKu4V0jnXbrflVr0ycxUkYWR0HVg56bV8elSPy0WNGiZDAaxhGan8WVl6
 Zmh5Q0a6ZpVBezcvnC9cFy/eZxbxz7jyp+1gK536P9S59b2U+ohEax8aqZJh0joh
 j2tFoczNA+YsyaEBRVtA9ZaCFnYO0Q0l3W78of7ffDbjn0hID/zF0tIkwEEZFDKR
 JRGcW6sKvt0OROSKEA+812ofBTfzu7SSkTE+/JSWZu3yAYZQb69pIP/agMaJtUDv
 XRmCOtnD6aKGb9RTC4c/Crmtw1CHTq+qBRoBLciwKmXTq6pOJiRutvuJROTbH/x9
 nXNmrOiPvDpfgP+4c7UmWXsAi2ACVyDN7mBQX/PmdXDH3Uvnb5bEe2KyZJEODZ52
 KoiWPPPUuB65CAWXld+5mh5S8857NEmwQ3F/XLs1bqTgfBJmDVUjdZ2xdsakUrFx
 QwElV2PUxXUDd0Hxu8NQrDl9Pi00Lo5w69DuS3rBKjWRrMAYzxicDIfx5myGaAS7
 Gpmjn1fR54JbvuAwp0tcOosXzWeCNr4yLuZXjclKxyK3nq5Wm9uULTsNfo6Oojn9
 zAhs7OiCp7G60ldhNbi7sNLNCPQPjpDn1WbfEJ84815e3dZbDE0=
 =zrLS
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'v18.2.2' into v19.x

v18.2.2
2023-04-14 14:37:57 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
3688ac9627
Merge pull request #5308 from PastaPastaPasta/v19.x-bp-final
[v19.x] backport: final version release backports
2023-04-11 13:06:23 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
4266edf784
doc: update the content of release notes for v19.0.0 and archive old release notes
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-11 12:41:13 -05:00
pasta
262ce6c455
chore: bump version to final 2023-04-09 21:49:23 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
dd49bc313b
chore: run gen-manpages.sh for 19.0.0 (#5305)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294

## What was done?
Called `contrib/devtools/gen-manpages.sh` on top of new assume valid
values, see dash#5304


## How Has This Been Tested?
Reviewed only

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:48:23 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
798af086b7
chore: update chainparams for v19.0.0 (#5304)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294

## What was done?
Bumped defaultAssumeValid, nMinimumChainWork, chainTxData,
checkPointsData


## How Has This Been Tested?
Called rpcs `getblockhash N`, `getblock HASH`, `getchaintxstats 17280
HASH`

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:48:15 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
0350a48ce2
fix: reviewing TODOes at v19 (#5303)
During reviewing TODO were found some TODOes that can be done now.

 - fix: follow-up dash#3467 - replaced commented code to disabled code
- follow-up bitcoin#16394 - uncommented code related to `watchonly`
feature
 - removed out-dated TODO in `rpc/masternode.cpp` (already done)
- fix: renamed name of clean up test_unittests: removed TODO and updated
name of variable TRAVIS
 - rewritten todo inside `.travis.yml`
 - fix: adds a missing description for result of rpc `mnsync`

Last commit (`mnsync`) is an only candidate for backport to v19, other
changes are non significant.

Run functional/unit tests

No breaking changes

- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:48:05 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
1fd442f229
feat: min protocol version check for SML serialisation (#5302)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This was reported/requested by @HashEngineering:
> Older versions of our App won't sync due to if (obj.nVersion ==
BASIC_BLS_VERSION) . Older versions don't know what version a SML Entry
is. As such, they will never read the type field. On the android client
this causes an offset problem when reading the mnlistdiff and it will
throw an exception that bans the peer that supplied it. Soon enough, no
peers will be left to connect to because they will all give the android
client bad data.

## What was done?
With this PR, SML will serialise the new v19 fields (`nType`,
`platformHTTPPort`, `platformNodeID`) if the client's version is at
least equal to `70227`.
Note: Serialisation for hashing skips the above rule.

Also, functional test mininode protocol version is set to `70227`.

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:47:31 -05:00
UdjinM6
fe1d7e083a
fix(tests): Bumps in wait_for_tx/instantlock (#5301)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. we need to move time forward to let invs being relayed
2. nNextInvSend in SendMessages can be bumped up to 30+ seconds into the
future in rare cases
make sure timeouts in tests are high enough to relay tx inv/wait for
corresponding islock

## What was done?
tl;dr: bump mocktime while waiting, wait longer
extracted fixes from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5288 but I
expect this to fix other sporadic test failures too

## How Has This Been Tested?
tests are ok locally and in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5288

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:47:24 -05:00
UdjinM6
1664246f77
fix(tests): a couple of fixes for dynamically_add/update functions (#5288)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should hopefully fix some sporadic ci test failures (like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4052206622#L1962)

## What was done?
tweaked dynamically_add/update functions to make checks more consistent
and avoid some edge cases, pls see individual commits

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_hpmn.py` and `feature_dip3_v19.py` still work locally,
let's see if ci is now (constantly) happy about these too...

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:47:14 -05:00
UdjinM6
93dc8076aa
chore: Translations 2023-02 (#5208) 2023-04-09 21:47:00 -05:00
UdjinM6
74fabcb1b9
chore: Translations 2023-02 (#5208) 2023-04-09 21:45:33 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
c9490bd91b
feat: min protocol version check for SML serialisation (#5302)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This was reported/requested by @HashEngineering:
> Older versions of our App won't sync due to if (obj.nVersion ==
BASIC_BLS_VERSION) . Older versions don't know what version a SML Entry
is. As such, they will never read the type field. On the android client
this causes an offset problem when reading the mnlistdiff and it will
throw an exception that bans the peer that supplied it. Soon enough, no
peers will be left to connect to because they will all give the android
client bad data.

## What was done?
With this PR, SML will serialise the new v19 fields (`nType`,
`platformHTTPPort`, `platformNodeID`) if the client's version is at
least equal to `70227`.
Note: Serialisation for hashing skips the above rule.

Also, functional test mininode protocol version is set to `70227`.

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 00:12:39 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
e35aeddf4a
fix: reviewing TODOes at v19 (#5303)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
During reviewing TODO were found some TODOes that can be done now.

## What was done?
 - fix: follow-up dash#3467 - replaced commented code to disabled code
- follow-up bitcoin#16394 - uncommented code related to `watchonly`
feature
 - removed out-dated TODO in `rpc/masternode.cpp` (already done)
- fix: renamed name of clean up test_unittests: removed TODO and updated
name of variable TRAVIS
 - rewritten todo inside `.travis.yml`
 - fix: adds a missing description for result of rpc `mnsync`

Last commit (`mnsync`) is an only candidate for backport to v19, other
changes are non significant.

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 00:11:22 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
e940be0973
chore: update chainparams for v19.0.0 (#5304)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294

## What was done?
Bumped defaultAssumeValid, nMinimumChainWork, chainTxData,
checkPointsData


## How Has This Been Tested?
Called rpcs `getblockhash N`, `getblock HASH`, `getchaintxstats 17280
HASH`

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 00:10:46 -05:00
UdjinM6
54681dbf09
fix(tests): a couple of fixes for dynamically_add/update functions (#5288)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should hopefully fix some sporadic ci test failures (like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4052206622#L1962)

## What was done?
tweaked dynamically_add/update functions to make checks more consistent
and avoid some edge cases, pls see individual commits

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_hpmn.py` and `feature_dip3_v19.py` still work locally,
let's see if ci is now (constantly) happy about these too...

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 00:09:18 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
3bb9cca242
Merge pull request #5297 from PastaPastaPasta/develop-trivial-2023-04-06
backport: trivial backports April 6
2023-04-09 00:07:47 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
401b55e5c4 Merge #18466: rpc: fix invalid parameter error codes for {sign,verify}message RPCs
a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f doc: release note for changed {sign,verify}message error codes (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9e399b9b2d386b28c0c0ff59fc75d31dbec31d9c test: check parameter validity in rpc_signmessage.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
e62f0c71f10def124b1c1219d790cef246a32c3e rpc: fix {sign,message}verify RPC errors for invalid address/signature (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  RPCs that accept address parameters usually return the intended error code `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` (-5) if a passed address is invalid. The two exceptions to the rule are `signmessage` and `verifymessage`, which return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) in this case instead. Oddly enough `verifymessage` returns `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` when the _signature_ was malformed, where `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` would be more approriate.

  This PR fixes these inaccuracies and as well adds tests to `rpc_signmessage.py` that check the parameter validity and error codes for the related RPCs `signmessagewithprivkey`, `signmessage` and `verifymessage`.

  master branch:
  ```
  $ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
  error code: -3
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
  error code: -3
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
  error code: -5
  error message:
  Malformed base64 encoding
  ```
  PR branch:
  ```
  $ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
  error code: -5
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
  error code: -5
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
  error code: -3
  error message:
  Malformed base64 encoding
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f
  meshcollider:
    utACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f

Tree-SHA512: bae0c4595a2603cea66090f6033785601837b45fd853052312b3a39d8520566c581994b68f693dd247c22586c638c3b7689c849085cce548cc36b9bf0e119d2d
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
fanquake
513bd84fa3 Merge #21159: test: fix sign comparison warning in socket tests
9cc8e30125df14fe47e21e55ab3bf26f4d416565 test: fix sign comparison warning in socket tests (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  This fixes:
  ```bash
  In file included from test/sock_tests.cpp:10:
  In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/unit_test.hpp:18:
  In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/test_tools.hpp:46:
  /usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:107:17: warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const long' and 'const unsigned long' [-Wsign-compare]
      return left == right;
             ~~~~ ^  ~~~~~
  ```

  which was introduced in #20788.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK 9cc8e30125df14fe47e21e55ab3bf26f4d416565
  vasild:
    ACK 9cc8e30125df14fe47e21e55ab3bf26f4d416565

Tree-SHA512: 7069a4fde5cec01be03f8477fe396e53658f170efbf1d9ef3339d553bb90a2be9f4acd6b348127b14cd2f91426e0cd1fc35d2d3c9f201cf748c0cf50f47e46a5
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
3a59c53cad Merge #21023: fuzz: Disable shuffle when merge=1
fabeb5b9c7f678ab3bc24c1860f8514ac52bb56f fuzz: Disable shuffle when merge=1 (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This should hopefully help make the deletion of fuzz inputs more deterministic.

  My tests (N=1) revealed that without this patch 7000 files differ (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/44#issuecomment-768841467). With this patch, "only" 2000 files differ.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK fabeb5b9c7f678ab3bc24c1860f8514ac52bb56f: `-shuffle=0` and `-prefer_small=1` make sense

Tree-SHA512: 21a701f52450d402a91dd6e0b33d564c63a9c3b919738eb9a80c24d48fc5b964088e325470738f39af0d595612c844acc7bf0941590cc2dc8c6f6ee4cb69c861
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
fanquake
f08a10230f Merge #21051: Fix -Wmismatched-tags warnings
b6aadcd5b4350a6ebcd57e88e7a0853cedf7c2fb build: Add -Werror=mismatched-tags (Hennadii Stepanov)
1485124291368c4a2ca8ea09c18e813f1dbabf5c Fix -Wmismatched-tags warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Warnings were introduced in #20749:
  ```
  ./validation.h:43:1: warning: class 'CCheckpointData' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
  class CCheckpointData;
  ^
  ./chainparams.h:24:8: note: previous use is here
  struct CCheckpointData {
         ^
  ./validation.h:43:1: note: did you mean struct here?
  class CCheckpointData;
  ^~~~~
  struct
  1 warning generated.
  ```

  This change fixes AppVeyor build: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/37547435

ACKs for top commit:
  glozow:
    utACK b6aadcd5b4 🚗
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK b6aadcd5b4350a6ebcd57e88e7a0853cedf7c2fb: patch looks correct

Tree-SHA512: 3ac887ebdbf9a1ae33c1fd5381b3b8d83388ad557ddeb55013acd42bb9752a5bd009e3a0eed52644a023a7a0dda1c159277981af82f58fb0abfe60b84e01bf29
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
09cf1a9124 Merge #21037: fuzz: Avoid designated initialization (C++20) in fuzz tests
dee2d6fbf9008d0e0667b3744d847192be6ef6e0 fuzz: Avoid designated initialization (C++20) in fuzz tests (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Avoid designated initialization (C++20) in fuzz tests.

  Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20197#discussion_r565270556, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20936#discussion_r566708730

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    cr ACK dee2d6fbf9008d0e0667b3744d847192be6ef6e0
  dhruv:
    code review ACK dee2d6fbf9008d0e0667b3744d847192be6ef6e0
  ajtowns:
    utACK dee2d6fbf9008d0e0667b3744d847192be6ef6e0

Tree-SHA512: 5940fab6e97a2b11dd3b1475d2cffa2840dc2e6ec34bd9f9df90f948709cab98fd1c513d5dd104816d33a525a6e9710b8715b02db941e35d84f92bc211f56d1d
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
fanquake
6ad61a0efe Merge #20985: doc: add xorriso to macOS depends packages
5b41d84b3469484ff6a1f4eb7c890b6444a16091 doc: add xorriso to macOS depends packages (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  This was missed in #20470.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 5b41d84b3469484ff6a1f4eb7c890b6444a16091, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64).

Tree-SHA512: bcfd8468a099c69175f8a9d295c1466764ab25d6a61121b28675a09c3e96f45b6309e1523d341f4cb21d0ddee4945f00ba060ba02da835f2f0db7e694fd6c44b
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
Samuel Dobson
af5c102d37 Merge #20952: wallet: Add BerkeleyDB version sanity check at init time
ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740 wallet: Add BerkeleyDB version sanity check at init time (Wladimir J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  Detect version conflicts between the run-time BerkeleyDB library and the one used during compilation.

  This is very unsafe (can result in anything from crashes to corruption) so shut down when one is detected.

ACKs for top commit:
  decryp2kanon:
    utACK ad57fb7
  achow101:
    ACK ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740
  theStack:
    utACK ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740
  meshcollider:
    Code review ACK ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740

Tree-SHA512: 99cd7d836bffbdeb3d4e14053f7139cc85a6d42e631a3f9a3058a848042446b364faee127500f5acb374616e6a61ab2bedebfac1ba9bc993b4d6227114c2a6c2
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
fanquake
54839f24af Merge #20771: refactor: Enable -Wswitch for FeeEstimateHorizon
faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89 refactor: Enable -Wswitch for FeeEstimateHorizon (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This enables the `-Wswitch` compiler warning for `FeeEstimateHorizon` by removing the `default` case in `switch` statements.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89
  jonatack:
    ACK faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89
  hebasto:
    ACK faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: 63a8dff6e8dead149ec2fa8319e7ff41022c9534d423d3086fd8f22be073dc4915f74c7fe9139ee681a8204730cf58c80ef40c93fb33032d586e68b4f78f557d
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
fanquake
6c660cf29a Merge #20674: fuzz: Call SendMessages after ProcessMessage to increase coverage
fa09f97beabafaaeb59fca710760578ff1f2e8d7 fuzz: Call SendMessages after ProcessMessage to increase coverage (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    Tested ACK fa09f97beabafaaeb59fca710760578ff1f2e8d7
  dhruv:
    tACK fa09f97
  Crypt-iQ:
    cr ACK fa09f97beabafaaeb59fca710760578ff1f2e8d7
  sipa:
    utACK fa09f97beabafaaeb59fca710760578ff1f2e8d7

Tree-SHA512: 87c52aa38f902c4f6c9c2380f486a3ab21edc0e21e48bb619cdb67cfd698154cc57b170eef31fc940c0bb2c878e155847de03fc6e4cd85bed25f10c4f80c747b
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
058df132c4 Merge #20589: log: Clarify that failure to read/write fee_estimates.dat is non-fatal
fa0d8359b351fd179a0a2f458671a4d7828c9a80 log: Clarify that failure to read fee_estimates.dat is non-fatal (MarcoFalke)
faefa5db5f1d95b772873f4429e8a8fbb4e71cf3 log: Clarify that failure to write fee_estimates.dat is non-fatal (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  two minor logging fixups

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK fa0d8359b351fd179a0a2f458671a4d7828c9a80: patch looks correct
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa0d8359b351fd179a0a2f458671a4d7828c9a80

Tree-SHA512: d1e7e595d3b4a5e497ee7ab70f3be5783dafec2726ef8e012db836c15e8e622022859a4472d6b516fe19d327737b25fdfb509cd9aeb022ca847b13c54e55800a
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
c4b1c8b274 Merge #19893: test: Remove or explain syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue
fa6af312277bb1b7e57d9b764d411c5b0873829f test: Document why syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue is needed in tests (MarcoFalke)
fa135a13b8ddaa117bd090ec43a3eab3a95755c1 Revert "test: Add missing sync_all to wallet_balance test" (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue is a hidden test-only RPC, so it should not be used when it is not needed. Thus, either remove it or explain why it is needed.

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    Code review ACK fa6af312277bb1b7e57d9b764d411c5b0873829f

Tree-SHA512: de30db4ab521184091ee5beeab02989138cf7cf05088f766a2fb106151b239310b63d5380cb79e2a072f72c5ae9513aecae8eb9c1c7be713771585c3cb04d63a
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
8746f52a51 Merge #20522: [test] Fix sync issue in disconnect_p2ps
3ebde2143aa98af213872b98b474d904e55056f7 [test] Fix wait condition in disconnect_p2ps (Amiti Uttarwar)

Pull request description:

  #19315 currently has a [test failure](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4545582645641216) because of a race. `disconnect_p2ps` is intended to have a `wait_until` clause that prevents this race, but the conditional doesn't match since its comparing two different object types. `MY_SUBVERSION` is defined in messages.py as a byte string, but is compared to the value returned by the RPC. This PR simply converts types to ensure they match, which should prevent the race from occurring.

  HUGE PROPS TO jnewbery for discovering the issue 🔎

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK 3ebde2143aa98af213872b98b474d904e55056f7
  glozow:
    Code review ACK 3ebde2143a

Tree-SHA512: ca096b80a3e4d757a645f38846d6dc89d6a3d35c3435513a72d278e305faddd4aff9e75a767941b51b2abbf59c82679bac1e9a0140d6f285efe3053e51bcc2a8
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
fanquake
54bc4ddcfc Merge #20152: doc: Update wallet files in files.md
defe48a51f4315f8cc607875a099981593c8cc39 doc: Update wallet files in files.md (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR is a #19077 follow up, and it addresses the [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19077#discussion_r504805234):

  > If need to update, there are two corrections that could be made:
  >
  >  * Line 69 "Wallets are Berkeley DB (BDB) databases" is no longer true
  >
  >  * Line 76 "Wallet lock file" should say "BDB wallet lock file"

ACKs for top commit:
  RiccardoMasutti:
    ACK defe48a
  meshcollider:
    ACK defe48a51f4315f8cc607875a099981593c8cc39

Tree-SHA512: 39939f86a9c7842bf06913998305dcbd6209585f1da0fe9c274bac0572eb8464e59176884dd9e2b91312f34efad40cdeb4085ec72c2a2c1b33d16b6ab505140c
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
cdb3a6490a Merge #19723: Ignore unknown messages before VERACK
675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902 Ignore unknown messages before VERACK (Suhas Daftuar)

Pull request description:

  This allows for feature negotiation to take place with messages between VERSION and VERACK in the future, without requiring additional software changes to specifically ignore messages for features that are unimplemented by our software.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    utACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902
  practicalswift:
    ACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902: patch looks correct
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902
  hebasto:
    ACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902, the offender peer will be eventually disconnected due to the timeout.

Tree-SHA512: 8d2b1d8b9843f2ee26b2c30f7c5ff0bfcfbe3f46b32cd0369c48ece26624151091237e83ce3f18c6da004099026602cfab1642ac916db777f047d170b365c007
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
353a7b8a2a Merge #19781: test: add parameterized constructor for msg_sendcmpct()
638441928a446726ce3a7fb20433a5478e7585bb test: add parameterized constructor for msg_sendcmpct() (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  While working on the test for #19776 I noticed that creating a `sendcmpct` message is quite cumbersome -- due to the lack of a parameterized constructor, one needs to create an empty (that is, initialized with default values) object and then set the two fields one by one. This PR replaces the default constructor with a parameterized constructor and uses it in the test `p2p_compactblocks.py`, reducing LOC. No need to pollute the namespace with temporary throw-away message objects anymore.

ACKs for top commit:
  guggero:
    Code review ACK 638441928a446726ce3a7fb20433a5478e7585bb.
  epson121:
    Code review ACK 638441928a446726ce3a7fb20433a5478e7585bb

Tree-SHA512: 3b58d276d714b73abc6cc98d1d52dec5f6026b33f03faaeb7dcbc5d83ac377555179f98b159b2b9ecc8957999c35a1dc082e3c69299c5fde4e35f1bd0587ce9d
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
ee3eae3c9f Merge #19897: Change FILE_CHAR_BLOCKLIST to FILE_CHARS_DISALLOWED
637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1 Change FILE_CHAR_BLOCKLIST to FILE_CHARS_DISALLOWED (Benoit Verret)

Pull request description:

  Blocklist is ambiguous. It could mean a list of blocks.

  Example: "blocknotify" in the same file refers to Bitcoin blocks.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
  laanwj:
    ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1 — this is a clear variable name improvement
  theStack:
    ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
  jonatack:
    ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
  eriknylund:
    ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1
  promag:
    ACK 637d8bce741213295bd9b9d1982cae663c701ba1.

Tree-SHA512: 028e7102eeaf61105736c55c119a7f5c05411f2b6715a7939c41cb9e8f13afb757bbb6e7a302b3aae21722e69dab91f6eff8099e5884d248299905b4c7687c02
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2699f44673 Merge #18882: build: fix -Wformat-security check when compiling with GCC
6cef3652d143a1dddad1254cab0953561d24c1fa build: fix -Wformat-security check when compiling with GCC (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  GCC expects `-Wformat` to be passed with [`-Wformat-security`](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html), which means
  when we test for it in configure it currently fails:

  ```bash
  checking whether C++ compiler accepts -Wformat-security... no
  ...
  configure:15907: checking whether C++ compiler accepts -Wformat-security
  configure:15926: g++ -std=c++11 -c -g -O2 -Werror -Wformat-security  conftest.cpp >&5
  cc1plus: error: '-Wformat-security' ignored without '-Wformat' [-Werror=format-security]
  cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
  ```

  and never gets added to our CXX flags. Note that Clang does not have this requirement and the check is working correctly there.

  The change in this PR is the simple fix, however we might want to consider using something like `-Wformat=2` in future, which in GCC is equivalent to `-Wformat -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k.` and similar [in Clang](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wformat-2).

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK 6cef3652d143a1dddad1254cab0953561d24c1fa
  laanwj:
    ACK 6cef3652d143a1dddad1254cab0953561d24c1fa

Tree-SHA512: f9230d42af39f85ea9d2f55dbbebd2bae4740fe59b0da2e092af3ac9ef7e6799d3a4cf83eb64574c63982e5f6b14e226d44c84fa0335255d65c9947d86a1ea38
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
MarcoFalke
9d0a82b02e Merge #18593: test: complete impl. of msg_merkleblock and wait_for_merkleblock
854382885f18aa9a95cdde3d11591b05c305ad3f refactor: test: improve wait_for{header,merkleblock} interface (Sebastian Falbesoner)
1356a45ef042e7bd3d539fbb606d6b1be547d00f test: complete impl. of msg_merkleblock and wait_for_merkleblock (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Implements the missing initialization/serialization methods for `msg_merkleblock`, based on the already present class `CMerkleBlock`. Also changes the method `wait_for_merkleblock()` to be more precise by waiting for a merkleblock with a specified blockhash instead of an arbitrary one.

  In the BIP37 test `p2p_filter.py`, this new method is used to make the test of receiving merkleblock and tx if a filter is set to be more precise, by checking if they also arrive in the right order.

  In the course of this PR, also the interface for the methods `wait_for_merkleblock()` and `wait_for_header()` are improved to take a hex string instead of an integer, which is more typesafe and less of a burden to the caller.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 854382885f18aa9a95cdde3d11591b05c305ad3f

Tree-SHA512: adaf0ac728ef0b9929cb417a7a7b4c1346c400b2d365bf6914515c67b6cfe8f4a7ecc62fb514afdce9792f0bed833416f6bca6b9620f3d5dcdc66e4d5b0b7ea3
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
Samuel Dobson
6a23888411 Merge #17677: Activate watchonly wallet behavior for LegacySPKM only
e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee Activate no-privkey -> ISMINE_WATCH_ONLY behavior for LegacySPKM only (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  Slight cleanup following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16944

  This should allow future scriptpubkeymans to transparently work, since the current plan is to have ismine always be spendable.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee
  Sjors:
    Code review ACK e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee
  meshcollider:
    Code review ACK e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee

Tree-SHA512: c0a86587d33b8b1646494a5cb0bf8681ee4a88e6913918157746943a0996b501903e0e6ee954cf04154c1e0faee0cbb375c74ca789f46ba9244eb5296632b042
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
8d6803432e
chore: run gen-manpages.sh for 19.0.0 (#5305)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294

## What was done?
Called `contrib/devtools/gen-manpages.sh` on top of new assume valid
values, see dash#5304


## How Has This Been Tested?
Reviewed only

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 00:05:39 -05:00
UdjinM6
2fe18b9b1d
fix(tests): Bumps in wait_for_tx/instantlock (#5301)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. we need to move time forward to let invs being relayed
2. nNextInvSend in SendMessages can be bumped up to 30+ seconds into the
future in rare cases
make sure timeouts in tests are high enough to relay tx inv/wait for
corresponding islock

## What was done?
tl;dr: bump mocktime while waiting, wait longer
extracted fixes from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5288 but I
expect this to fix other sporadic test failures too

## How Has This Been Tested?
tests are ok locally and in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5288

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-07 18:08:37 +03:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
cc7be07fb9
ci: retry non-deterministic tests and report failure only if limit exhausted (#4793)
## Motivation

Dash Core has a series of functional tests that do not behave in a
deterministic fashion and have a higher chance of failure, especially on
resource limited systems. This results in a lot of false-negatives
during CI runs, prompting the need to re-run them, which is annoying at
best and generates apathy towards CI failure at worst.

## History

The first approach was to isolate non-deterministic tests into their own
distinct GItLab runner, making it such that if a test failed, only that
one runner had to be restarted, instead of the multiple runners that
failed due to these tests.

One problem with this was that this approach effectively omitted these
tests from TSan and UBSan coverage as attempting to combine TSan and
UBSan would cause significant resource exhaustion.

## Description

An alternative approach is to introduce a new flag, `--retries`,
applicable only on non-deterministic tests, that allow a failed test to
be repeated up to a set number of times (default: 3), only reporting
failure once the limit is exhausted.

A limitation of this is that only the log dump from the last attempt
will be available.

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-06 23:55:52 -05:00
UdjinM6
b0f7612f2c
Merge pull request #5278 from knst/bc-bp-v20-missing-1
backport: bitcoin#13072, #14096, #14161, #15831, #16250, #16251, #17049, #17056, #17138, #18032 (rpc_createmultisig.py and some extra)
2023-04-06 20:16:04 +03:00
MarcoFalke
baa37c345c Merge #17138: Remove wallet access to some node arguments
This backports also includes extra changes that were missing from bitcoin#14711
They are required, otherwise impossible to remove validaion.h dependency as it meant in #17138

b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002 [wallet] Remove pruning check for -rescan option (John Newbery)
eea462de9c652dca556ad241d2126b10790f67f8 [wallet] Remove package limit config access from wallet (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Removes wallet access to `-limitancestorcount`, `-limitdescendantcount` and `-prune`:

  - `-limitancestorcount` and `-limitdescendantcount` are now accessed with a method `getPackageLimits` in the `Chain` interface.
  - `-prune` is not required. It was only used in wallet component initiation to prevent running `-rescan` when pruning was enabled. This check is not required.

  Partially addresses #17137.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    Tested ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002
  promag:
    Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002.
  ariard:
    ACK b96ed03, check there isn't left anymore wallet access to node arguments.

Tree-SHA512: 90c8e3e083acbd37724f1bccf63dab642cf9ae95cc5e684872a67443ae048b4fdbf57b52ea47c5a1da6489fd277278fe2d9bbe95e17f3d4965a1a0fbdeb815bf
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
d82ec8bb6b fix: dashification for rpc_createmultisig introduced in bitcoin#13072
- updated data file with dash addresses
 - removed witness/bench32 support from rpc_createmultisig.py
 - other specific changes, such as wallet balances after N mined blocks
 - updated descriptors for multisort sign (fixes for bitcoin#17056)
2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00
Konstantin Akimov
4e19d00773 backport: follow-up new rpc_createmultisig.py (bitcoin#13072) - changes from bitcoin#17675 2023-04-06 20:15:47 +03:00