7c6c93d201 fix: remove missing comment to follow-up for bitcoin#15864 (Konstantin Akimov)
65226da849 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22229: test: consolidate to f-strings (part 1) (MarcoFalke)
ad2c5a53ee refactor: unify feature_notifications.py after #5522 with bitcoin's codebase (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Just one backport bitcoin#22229 because it is a big size, even though there's nothing non-trivial in it.
Though, even it is called as part I, there has not been part II yet.
## What was done?
Some preparation, code unifications to make bitcoin#22229 with less conflicts and finally backport of itselfl.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit & functional test
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 7c6c93d201
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 7c6c93d201
Tree-SHA512: fe296e3255d45a7a1924bd1e5e21634b3cd36ea3f71cf5e8684b54336771665ea7758de7bfc78721669a928f967e7d4db7b1da0a5cd275feb1a2ec0df841ad5c
68faa87881f5334b2528db4adc72ec19d94316a3 test: use f-strings in mining_*.py tests (fanquake)
c2a5d560df2824df5731100c2584e8ad7a3d7bc2 test: use f-strings in interface_*.py tests (fanquake)
86d958262dff43002820d58ccb8958e2dbfb9d5b test: use f-strings in feature_proxy.py (fanquake)
31bdb33dcb8345df1bb94b28e811252a918d7dcb test: use f-strings in feature_segwit.py (fanquake)
b166d54c3cbb0c028210cee977b3dcde5ac5474f test: use f-strings in feature_versionbits_warning.py (fanquake)
cf6d66bf941d946600047d712c7cd15d7605322e test: use f-strings in feature_settings.py (fanquake)
6651d77f22862716f5bd7d0b31cfbd3937ab7b1d test: use f-strings in feature_pruning.py (fanquake)
961f5813ba65b6a601081912c4ece96c2679794d test: use f-strings in feature_notifications.py (fanquake)
1a546e6f6ca95772f0d7dbc2792477becbb8ea63 test: use f-strings in feature_minchainwork.py (fanquake)
6679eceacc915a8ea7cd7063f103ffc5eb9da884 test: use f-strings in feature_logging.py (fanquake)
fb633933ab570e945d2a366f37eeff39f516c613 test: use f-strings in feature_loadblock.py (fanquake)
e9ca8b254d4b9567831c0e113ce1c0a2b4795a95 test: use f-strings in feature_help.py (fanquake)
ff7e3309995a8960ac371741b2b00c6da40f7490 test: use f-strings in feature_filelock.py (fanquake)
d5a6adc5e478fa5c6e562377eea873dc38e66578 test: use f-strings in feature_fee_estimation.py (fanquake)
a2de33cbdc79202bccddb4beadfde88266ac979f test: use f-strings in feature_dersig.py (fanquake)
a2502cc63fd308be8af840962da9c53339433fa6 test: use f-strings in feature_dbcrash.py (fanquake)
3e2f84e7a96cb4b97b609ac853f78edd0ed43f82 test: use f-strings in feature_csv_activation.py (fanquake)
e2f1fd8ee92fa421b6d293169044d6ddd5a9b8df test: use f-strings in feature_config_args.py (fanquake)
36d33d32b1b498b61f56d552f6e2c1d064f978c3 test: use f-strings in feature_cltv.py (fanquake)
dca173cc044270b30782b1e3355e9dcb8c534295 test: use f-strings in feature_blocksdir.py (fanquake)
5453e8706278918ac51a725e81599cfa18c8cdbc test: use f-strings in feature_backwards_compatibility.py (fanquake)
6f3d5ad67ac8e7b50abae1a2949898d858e38106 test: use f-strings in feature_asmap.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Rather than using 3 different ways to build/format strings (sometimes all in the same test, i.e [`feature_config_args.py`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_config_args.py)), consolidate to using [f-strings (3.6+)](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#f-strings), which are generally more concise / readable, as well as more performant than existing methods.
This deals with the `feature_*.py`, `interface_*.py` and `mining_*.py` tests.
See also: [PEP 498](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0498/)
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
reACK 68faa87881f5334b2528db4adc72ec19d94316a3
Zero-1729:
crACK 68faa87881f5334b2528db4adc72ec19d94316a3
Tree-SHA512: d4e1a42e07d96d2c552387a46da1534223c4ce408703d7568ad2ef580797dd68d9695b8d19666b567af37f44de6e430e8be5db5d5404ba8fcecf9f5b026a6efb
a7b46a1feae60e38fe4bdcacf5034f44cae49222 test: added coverage to mining_basic.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if we call submitblock with block.vtx.empty() then it throws an rpc deserialization error, currently we only test if !block.vtx->IsCoinBase() throws an rpc deserialization error
I've tested to make sure this actually doing what I intended by breaking up this if block into two if blocks with different error messages and running the functional test
322ec63b01/src/rpc/mining.cpp (L963)
This change should increase the test coverage for the `submitblock()` rpc in `./src/rpc/mining.cpp`
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK a7b46a1feae60e38fe4bdcacf5034f44cae49222
Tree-SHA512: 4078cb1fa879cc9e34438319f73085b521b90a5a95348b23e494cf8e5ac792ec426bc0e1a63e949645e16afebe54c5f35a194f02e20b7273871163d89a5c44e6
Backport notice:
- data have real blocks from testnet
- due to big gap in blocks before checkpoints (half-year) for sack of this test is added one more checkpoint, otherwise blocks are not accepted due to non-mockable time for other chains except regtest
- data for 2 blocks in split chain are generated locally for testnet
--------------
333317ce6b67aa92f7363d48cd750712190b4b6b test: Test that low difficulty chain fork is rejected (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc1bf4ee471c4641eef8de02702ba0619ae7 test: Pass down correct chain name in tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To prevent OOM, Bitcoin Core will reject chain forks at low difficulty by default. This is the only use-case of checkpoints, so add a test for it to make sure the feature works as expected. If it didn't work, checkpoints would have no use-case and we might as well remove them
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Thanks for adding the node 1 example. Code review ACK 333317c
Tree-SHA512: 90dffa540d0904f3cffb61d2382b1a26f84fe9560b7013e4461546383add31a8757b350616a6d43217c59ef7b8b2a1b62bb3bab582c679cbb2c660a782ce7be1
10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408)
549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408)
7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408)
784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`.
I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests).
Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another.
The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this:
```py
p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
```
A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly.
If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself).
ACKs for top commit:
robot-dreams:
utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d
jnewbery:
utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d
guggero:
Concept ACK 10d61505.
Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery)
5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery)
85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery)
9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize:
- a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces.
- one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'.
For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK d5800da519
MarcoFalke:
ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞
Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase.
The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used.
Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
instagibbs:
manual inspection ACK dac7a111bd
practicalswift:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :)
Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
fa98e10d5efcd965ee224ec21c9e79ebb123f055 test: Remove leftover comment in mining_basic (MarcoFalke)
faedb50d89cf113084adfa50c280c295c95571a8 test: pep-8 mining_basic (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove an accidental leftover comment from #19082, which no longer applies and thus might be confusing
ACKs for top commit:
adamjonas:
code review ACK fa98e10
Tree-SHA512: c7f7f8f579b3c6e92f45769be0a7af1a421438a3f5524db5278b2269511a9e0e08f44e3836afb26727644035897ee51ff8296d13ce23030549e7403f57b40e40
7daffc6a90a797ce7c365a893a31a31b0206985c [test] CScriptNum Decode Check as Unit Tests (Gillian Chu)
Pull request description:
The CScriptNum test (#14816) is a roundtrip test of the test framework. Thus, it would be better suited as a unit test. This is now possible with the introduction of the unit test module for the functional tests. See #18576.
This PR:
1. Refactors the CScriptNum tests into 2 unit tests, one in script.py and one in blocktools.py.
2. Extends the script.py CScriptNum test to trial larger numbers.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7daffc6a90a797ce7c365a893a31a31b0206985c
Tree-SHA512: 17a04a4bfff1b1817bfc167824c679455d9e06e6e0164c00a7e44f8aa5041c5f5080adcc1452fd80ba1a6d8409f976c982bc481d686c434edf97a5893a32a436
b651ef7e1c submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741745 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
The fewer magic numbers the better.
Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.
Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
fa178a6385 [rpc] mining: Omit uninitialized currentblockweight, currentblocktx (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Previously we'd report "0", which could be mistaken for a valid number. E.g. the number of transactions is 0 or the block weight is 0, whatever that means.
Tree-SHA512: ee94ab203a329e272211b726f4c23edec4b09c650ec363b77fd59ad9264165d73064f78ebb9e11b5c2c543b73c157752410a307655560531c7d5444d203aa0ea
0ca4c8b3c6 Changed functional tests which do not require wallets to run without (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Addresses #14216 . Changed Changed `get_deterministic_priv_key()` to return named tuple`(address, key)`
I have tried to be exhaustive as possible in maximum coverage for non-wallet mode without affecting any coverage for wallet mode.
However, I could not check the tests in wallet mode because of timeout issues. Hopefully, travis job checks those.
Tests `feature_block.py`, `feature_logging.py` and `feature_reindex.py` were skipping despite having no direct dependency on any wallet functions. So, I have also disabled the `skip_test_no_wallet()` for those files too.
Tree-SHA512: 8f84bd8400a732d4266c7518d5cbcf1eb761f623a64a74849e0470142c8ef22cb75364474ddae75d9213c3d16659a52917b5ed979a313695da6abd16c4fd7445
fac95398366f644911b58f1605e6bc37fb76782d qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled (MarcoFalke)
faa669cbcd1fc799517b523b0f850e01b11bf40a qa: Premine to deterministic address with -disablewallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the test_runner would exit if the wallet was not compiled into the Bitcoin Core executable. However, a lot of the tests run without the wallet just fine and there is no need to globally require the wallet to run the tests.
Tree-SHA512: 63177260aa29126fd20f0be217a82b10b62288ab846f96f1cbcc3bd2c52702437703475d91eae3f8d821a3149fc62b725a4c5b2a7b3657b67ffcbc81532a03bb
fa6ab8ada1 rpc: Return more specific reject reason for submitblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The second commit in #13439 made the `TODO` in the first commit impossible to solve.
The meaning of `fNewBlock` changed from "This is the first time we process this block" to "We are about to write the new *valid* block".
So whenever `fNewBlock` is true, the block was valid. And whenever the `fNewBlock` is false, the block is either valid or invalid. If it was valid and not new, we know it is a `"duplicate"`. In all other cases, the `BIP22ValidationResult()` will return the reason why it is invalid.
Tree-SHA512: 4b6edf7a912339c3acb0fccfabbdd6d812a0321fb1639c244c2714e58dc119aa2b8c6bf8f7d61ea609a1b861bbc23f920370fcf989c48452721e259a8ce93d24
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
2012d4df2 Add CScriptNum decode python implementation in functional suite (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I needed this for reasons and thought it'd be good to upsteam it.
Tree-SHA512: 6ea89fa2a5f5a7759ba722f2b4ed5cd6423ebfff4e83ac8b8b5c935e6aa479684e626c5f41fa020816d2a9079a99af5564e30808594d5c13e3b51ec9b474926d
fa0815c300 rpc: Correctly name arguments (Jon Layton)
Pull request description:
Consistently use the same name to describe arguments in the documentation and add a test that uses the name.
By splitting it up, the changes are easier to potentially backport and also make review easier when we switch to `RPCHelpMan`.
The tests should pass with or without the changes in `src`.
Partly stolen from #14459 (More RPC help description fixes by ch4ot1c)
Tree-SHA512: 1072992b1e93ac41006613523e54a0a8004f529fcb101eb9d74d91474abb0945a5a7539f249905151b904b87448f9efc0cacbd9e052fbe2ea9111e62f3e7249c
* Merge bitcoin#13399: rpc: Add submitheader
fa091b001605c4481fb4eca415929a98d3478549 qa: Add tests for submitheader (MarcoFalke)
36b1b63f20cc718084971d2cadd04497a9b72634 rpc: Expose ProcessNewBlockHeaders (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` as an rpc called `submitheader`.
This can be used to check for invalid block headers and submission of
valid block headers via the rpc.
Tree-SHA512:
a61e850470f15465f88e450609116df0a98d5d9afadf36b2033d820933d8b6a4012f9f2b3246319c08a0e511bef517f5d808cd0f44ffca91d10895a938004f0b
* Update test/functional/mining_basic.py
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports.
Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools.
An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports.
Before this commit:
```
$ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
$
```
After this commit:
```
$ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
$
```
Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
* Merge #16509: test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest"
faf36838bdba7393960fce6ad0c56dc1f93f5870 test: Avoid hardcoding the chain name in combine_logs (MarcoFalke)
fa8a1d7ba30040f8c74f93fc41a61276c255a6a6 test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest" (MarcoFalke)
68f546635d5de2ccfedadeabc7bc79e12e5eca6a test: Fix “local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used” (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This is required for various work in progress:
* testchains #8994
* signet #16411
* some of my locally written tests
While it will be unused in the master branch as of now, it will make all of those pull requests shorter. Thus review for non-regtest tests can focus on the actual changes and not some test framework changes.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faf36838bdba7393960fce6ad0c56dc1f93f5870, ran tests and reviewed the code.
Tree-SHA512: 35add66c12cab68f2fac8f7c7d47c604d3f24eae9336ff78f83e2c92b3dc08a25e7f4217199bac5393dd3fb72f945bba9c001d6fbb8efd298c88858075fcb3d6
* Add devnet support for tests
* test: make sure devnet can connect to each other and start
* Partial merge bitcoin/bitcoin#16681: Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests, revert one TODO while at it
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention
5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.
Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80
* update violation count
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests
6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:
tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
tests for mining features are named mining_...
tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...
Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.
Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16
* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: Fix excluded test names
* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
