3783b70129 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Bumped protocol version to 70233
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3783b70129
knst:
utACK 3783b70129
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
3783b70129 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Bumped protocol version to 70233
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3783b70129
knst:
utACK 3783b70129
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
0f239203a8 partial bitcoin#24169: Add --enable-c++20 option (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a3b79267e0 merge bitcoin#20744: Use std::filesystem. Remove Boost Filesystem & System (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
be7ac493d0 merge bitcoin#24167: consistently use fsbridge:: for ifstream / ofstream (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7ffea4348f merge bitcoin#24104: Make compatible with boost 1.78 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7c270e6883 merge bitcoin#24026: Block unsafe std::string fs::path conversion copy_file calls (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b0d2484a0b merge bitcoin#23522: Improve fs::PathToString documentation (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
20d359b570 partial bitcoin#23469: Remove Boost build note from build-unix.md (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
193f6fde2e merge bitcoin#23446: Mention that BerkeleyDB is for legacy wallet in build-unix (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ecfac10b8e merge bitcoin#22937: Forbid calling unsafe fs::path(std::string) constructor and fs::path::string() method (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
23fe7e2f07 chore: dashify symbols in some unit tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
28b96a071d merge bitcoin#22840: fix unoptimized libraries in depends (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6085
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6137
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6150
## Breaking Changes
None observed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 0f239203a8
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0f239203a8
Tree-SHA512: 4b8f0ae55185ece27d8084a5339196b7ed993c8138f4c59a0db3e16729d4edf4a59a68a8c7309c32df57734c07182821c4878b55c253da5df763204ad7158426
21f174aff1 feat: improve query categorisation in Qt App (Konstantin Akimov)
c863473286 test: add spending asset unlock tx in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
1fb67ece0e feat: make a support of Qt app to show Platform Transfer transaction as a new type of transaction (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Transfers from platform have incorrectly shown amount in Dash Core wallet app.
They also shown in Qt app as self-send that is not completely true.
## What was done?
Added new type of transaction to Qt App, added a filter for its type, fixed calculation of output for tx records.
As well added a new type of transaction `platform-transfer` in rpc output of `gettransaction` RPC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Make a Platform Transfer transaction on RegTest and check it in Dash Core
Helper to see it: export dpath=/tmp/dash_func_test_PATHPATH/ ; src/qt/dash-qt -regtest -conf=$dpath/node0/dash.conf -datadir=$dpath/node0/ -debug=0 -debuglogfile=/dev/stdout
## Breaking Changes
There's new type of transaction "platform-transfer" in rpc output of `gettransaction`.
**This PR DOES NOT change any consensus rules.**
Breaking changes that makes withdrawal transaction immature is moved to https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6128
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec2a54a910f121ad30ff8e94cf17080b5b3c651872e9bc3de9ec0924ca7f7a0e526b74b05cde26aaf860e3809e67f66142112319a69c216527e5bcb1b8a2b8f6
cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae qt: Refactor to remove unnecessary block in DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
57785fb7f61e51e8a8a459486a594443665ea8c9 qt: Early subscribe core signals in transaction table model (João Barbosa)
c6cbdf1a90a253fef0259b365a782bf88cd437f2 qt: Refactor ShowProgress to DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
3bccd50ad2f384e6c8c97c7f44bda7ae0d777696 qt: Set flag after inital load on transaction table model (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This fixes the case where transaction notifications arrive between `getWalletTxs` and `subscribeToCoreSignals`. Basically notifications are queued until `getWalletTxs` and wallet rescan complete.
This is also a requirement to call `getWalletTxs` in a background thread.
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20241.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
tACK cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae. Only change since last review is splitting commits and replacing m_progress with m_loading.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK cafef080a2e59c2bcae6baeee3c3c7e187e931ae
Tree-SHA512: 003caab2f2ae3522619711c8d02d521d2b8f7f280a467f6c3d08abf37ca81cc66b4b9fa10acfdf34e5fe250da7b696cfeec435f72b53c1ea97ccda96d8b4be33
7eea659fc908e5edfc90c185a6958ed07ecf5cd4 qt, test: use qsignalspy instead of qeventloop (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR refactors our GUI `apptests` to use [QSignalSpy](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsignalspy.html) instead of [QEventLoop](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qeventloop.html).
`QSignalSpy` is more appropriate for our GUI test's as it is purpose-built for testing emission of signals and sets up its own `QEventLoop` when the `wait` function is called.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 7eea659fc908e5edfc90c185a6958ed07ecf5cd4, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (Qt 5.12.8).
promag:
Code review ACK 7eea659fc908e5edfc90c185a6958ed07ecf5cd4.
Tree-SHA512: 3adddbcc5efd726302b606980c9923025c44bb8ee16cb8a183e633e423179c0822db66de9ccba20dc5124fff34af4151a379c9cd18130625c60789ce809ee6fd
2a45134b5694c12546d77cdff541612881f7e3e7 qt: Add shortcuts for console font resize buttons (Hennadii Stepanov)
a2e122f0fe72d695762db2b83905e246f451300c qt: Add GUIUtil::AddButtonShortcut (Hennadii Stepanov)
4ee9ee72363d46c5ba0c71b8d8283d9c5621e3ed qt: Use native presentation of shortcut (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On `master` the only way to resize the console font is to manually move your mouse and click the resize buttons. This PR introduces convenient keyboard shortcuts to resize the console font.
The common resize shortcuts for applications are `Ctrl+=`/`Ctrl++` and `Ctrl+-`/`Ctrl+_`. This means that the resize QPushButtons need two shortcuts each, but you cannot assign multiple shortcuts to a QPushButton. See: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractbutton.html#shortcut-prop
To get around this, we introduce a new function in `guiutil`, which connects a supplied `QKeySequence` shortcut to a `QAbstractButton`. This function can be reused in other situations where more than one shortcut is needed for a button.
| PR on macOS | PR on Linux |
| ---------------- | ------------ |
|  |  |
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 2a45134b5694c12546d77cdff541612881f7e3e7
Talkless:
tACK 2a45134b5694c12546d77cdff541612881f7e3e7, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2, shortcuts still work.
Tree-SHA512: e894ccb7e5c695ba83998c21a474d6c587c9c849f12ced665c5e0034feb6b143e41b32ba135cab6cfab22cbf153d5a52b1083b2a278e6dfca3f5ad14c0f6c573
33b0b26a03a401bd39b88931b69d162c3c538d31 doc: note that brew installed qt is not supported (Raul Siles)
Pull request description:
picking up #21791, the author has stated they [cannot squash](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21791#issuecomment-828770283).
This is a useful note to prevent any issues from being opened up about this. The reason that both cannot co-exist and build bitcoin is stated [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21791#issuecomment-837278123):
> ... the reason is sharing /usr/local/include/ and /usr/local/lib/ directories by both qt5 and qt6 installations.
Changes from original PR:
- slightly move the note up in this section, this placement seems more appropriate to me
- drop "Note:"
[PR Render](33b0b26a03/doc/build-osx.md (qt))
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
LGTM ACK 33b0b26a03a401bd39b88931b69d162c3c538d31
hebasto:
ACK 33b0b26a03a401bd39b88931b69d162c3c538d31
Tree-SHA512: f9efac1921a7a33b5791a9f9f4bada4b5369d358fc42e9884c077bfb4dc3f273fdd4432ce012006a8009dfafb87e13bddd56c6336fe84b6133f4b22f849c289a
07bc22ef105dee3c6c465a3ef31e52fd198e786d docs: improve make with parallel jobs description. (Klement Tan)
Pull request description:
Changed `use -jX here for parallelism` to `use "-j N" for N parallel jobs`
**Rationale**: In my opinion `use -jX here for parallelism` is quite ambiguous as it could be perceived as a single option without any argument. Ie running:
```sh
make -jX
```
Embarrassingly this caused me to be stuck for quite a long time until I opened the help menu for `make` but if I am the only one who faced this issue I would be happy to close this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 07bc22ef105dee3c6c465a3ef31e52fd198e786d
Tree-SHA512: 2d119b6a461668906c63184b865d2cc9fb2f75abeba34e2e44bc1ef3bcb4adec4a49896ddaf3cc6a20c0095ad20d0de0908401b351eaca9443161d24d6b20d0b
cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06 qt: Use template function qOverload in signal-slot connections (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A nice template function [`qOverload`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtglobal.html#qOverload) is available for us now (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20413, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21286).
Its usage makes code much more readable.
This PR does not change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
utACK cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06.
promag:
Code review ACK cdbc2bd1f1c171848c1fef7f217afe140e1afb06.
Tree-SHA512: 72002aa646b1a79bab62d498825b3f245dc7ebdc189280f8bd3b4076e1bb50be8802c02bc872ff6f70c1ea81faec66d3bec36471119dd98c9e70d87b990396ae
5a4a15d2b4456272fd8aa080195f40a09576ae01 qt, refactor: Drop no longer used PeerTableModel::getRowByNodeId func (Hennadii Stepanov)
9a9f180df0d51396fee2468681df6dd935b0248e qt, refactor: Drop no longer used PeerTableModel::sort function (Hennadii Stepanov)
778a64af209e4fa692a3aca8376ba1bd5e1af881 qt: Use PeerTableSortProxy for sorting peer table (Hennadii Stepanov)
df2d165ba9e0acc53f36a326f68f57ad9c297872 qt: Add peertablesortproxy module (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The "Peers" table in the "Node" window does not hold multiple selection after sorting.
This PR introduces a `QSortFilterProxyModel` subclass, that is a standard Qt [practice](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/model-view-programming.html#custom-sorting-models) for such cases.
Now the sorting code is encapsulated into the dedicated Qt class, and we do not need to maintain it.
Fixes#283 (additionally).
---
On **master** (7ae86b3c6845873ca96650fc69beb4ae5285c801):
- rows are sorted by "Ping", and a selection is made
- rows are sorted by "NodeId", and the previous selection is _lost_
With **this PR**:
- rows are sorted by "Ping", and a selection is made
- rows are sorted by "NodeId", and the row are still selected
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
re-ACK 5a4a15d2b4456272fd8aa080195f40a09576ae01, tested on macOS 11.2 Qt 5.15.2 after rebase
promag:
Tested ACK 5a4a15d2b4456272fd8aa080195f40a09576ae01.
Tree-SHA512: f81c1385892fbf1a46ffb98b42094ca1cc97da52114bbbc94fedb553899b1f18c26a349e186bba6e27922a89426bd61e8bc88b1f7832512dbe211b5f834e076e
16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672 qt, refactor: Use better QMenu::addAction overloaded function (Hennadii Stepanov)
79311750b58d650d49a3f0edd59d31dd132ab8c0 qt: Do not assign Alt+<KEY> shortcuts to context menu actions (Hennadii Stepanov)
963e12058f3ca3cdaeefd9aa5a8305fa41afd1a0 qt: Drop menu separator that separates nothing (Hennadii Stepanov)
1398a6536c710368d9f1d0cf6e280fe63d07c9f0 qt, refactor: Make AddressBookPage::deleteAction a local variable (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
1. removes useless `Alt` + `<KEY>` shortcuts from context menu items
2. replaces 3 lines of code with the only call of [`QMenu::addAction`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qmenu.html#addAction-5) for each context menu item (it became possible since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21286 was merged)
3. makes other minor cleanups
No behavior change.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672
promag:
Code review ACK 16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672. Nice code cleanup that takes advantage of more recent Qt API.
jarolrod:
ACK 16c157de3c316517e095994fa8d526253225a672
Tree-SHA512: e5555fe957058cc67b351aaf9f09fe3635edb2d07a2223d3093913a25607ae538f0a2fde84c0b0cd43e7475b248949548eb4a5d4b21d8f7391fa2fa8541c04ff
8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0 gui: correct replacement of amp character in the wallet name for QMenu (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
In the current implementation Qt uses '&' as a signal to underscore letter and use it as a hot-key, which is not expected for case of wallet name.
The [comment in the code](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30446/files#diff-2ecf8cbf369cf3d2f3d2b1cf5cfe4c1a647d63e11e2885d2fd0ac11fb5f7a804L402-L404) regarding the use of an "&" on a menu item is misleading.
If a wallet name has an "&" in it, it is not supposed to be interpreted as a hot-key, but it should be shown as it is without replacing it to an underscore.
See screenshots before & after:
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0.
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 8233ee41ab9648cd0c3bd78bc2a8d692a54d9ea0. Tested on Ubuntu 22.04 using Qt version 5.15.3
Tree-SHA512: 918c2c05555d203a8b203794c138651d4a1691a05a858631d5a4664b78e150402d1ae4a02ee5181f63a5b22a09badca0a4ea14a626f45f8cbe557226c308b8c5
f22ade31b9 tests: more strict test for withrawal 1000 and minor improvements (UdjinM6)
4ad18f64f5 fix: properly test hard limit of 1000 dash (Konstantin Akimov)
a2fe2b27d9 test: minor improvements for credit pool functional test (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
DIP for Credit Pool says:
```
The withdrawal should not be mined if:
* It requests more DASH than the credit pool contains
* It requests more than 1000 DASH
* The credit pool contains more than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than a 10% reduction in the credit pool over the 576-block window
* The credit pool contains less than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than 100 DASH being removed from the pool over the 576-block window
```
Though, current functional test for asset locks improperly test this case, because threshold for big withdrawal happens by 10%, not 1000 dash.
## What was done?
Improvements for functional asset lock test to actually test a limit 1000 dash, not just 10%
## How Has This Been Tested?
See changes
## Breaking Changes
N/A, changes only for tests
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK f22ade31b9
Tree-SHA512: 2fdbfa85a3fc41683d68d1577916178ad686ccf0fba6abb22dc84a7ad69e0d44f876e371a24935c5167baa5491000662cc98cc1cd205e3817f0ffc65d2b4953d
b73f48f3b9 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22057: test: use MiniWallet (P2PK mode) for feature_dersig.py (MarcoFalke)
d5a8d5e6a0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22048: test: MiniWallet: introduce enum type for output mode (MarcoFalke)
f4cd20b115 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21945: test: add P2PK support to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
7be6db6dca docs: add an explanation for vsize in MiniWallet (Konstantin Akimov)
5d10b41302 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21840: test: Misc refactor to get rid of &foo[0] raw pointers (MarcoFalke)
7522ee9868 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21900: test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (MarcoFalke)
c6f603c26f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21897: rpc: adjust incorrect RPCHelpMan types (MarcoFalke)
1dffe3ab9f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21867: test: use MiniWallet for p2p_blocksonly.py (MarcoFalke)
81d21eea14 Merge #21557: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests (MarcoFalke)
cc169c2457 partial Merge #20842: docs: consolidate typo & url fixing (MarcoFalke)
2be1604405 Merge #20459: rpc: Fail to return undocumented return values (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Backports from v22 bitcoin.
Mostly related to MiniWallet and RPC improvements, see commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK b73f48f3b9
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b73f48f3b9
Tree-SHA512: 588f3a30697c0d77dadcc463aba71a00bf26eeef41b0cb8b9197799a217ebeb1d1ce7b5021ccc4576f0e9ca0e75ad840820cdc682fe8f120596788a528727a0b
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
56cc39d178 chore: bump version to 21.0.2 (pasta)
5619c8f5fd docs: add release notes for v21.0.1 and archive v21.0.0 (pasta)
9e80d128c0 Merge #6163: fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (pasta)
e10c5c9579 Merge #6160: feat: add sbom and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0c11f0e99b8542df013021bed639e86e188b6a20;
kwvg:
utACK 0c11f0e99b
Tree-SHA512: c8f81678ba9a742b3e1a674ffc291e30d63900fd1e1328bf5528210d0a983b9c5c9b3960ce76fd6ed8fd7014a92e09dcfa093bcd7a4bad2e3ea2d5e849ee28bc
56cc39d178 chore: bump version to 21.0.2 (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
my bad... forgot
## What was done?
Bump version in configure.ac
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 56cc39d178
Tree-SHA512: 7f85d3521e7a264d212a678a3e7ac6d39fceeee209433a02f3c05dcd9dec28ce2893e75a7754331d913ec8215ddda205cf0fbc5c0e0c02eb1afeb899635f29f5
5619c8f5fd docs: add release notes for v21.0.1 and archive v21.0.0 (pasta)
9e80d128c0 Merge #6163: fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (pasta)
e10c5c9579 Merge #6160: feat: add sbom and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Backport PRs for v21.0.1
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
See CI
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
kwvg:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
UdjinM6:
utACK 5619c8f5fd
Tree-SHA512: 42c1e31319775e5800da2d82af00cae3aa0cee3baadd0123a809efc246d4ca5d0e6a4166b574e6ddebf66c0a80f4ee1655caff085f1687bb533889414a9fd4cf
3468ab34d1 fix: use blocks-only instead of address-only for inventory (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mobile client (without full blockchain) can't receive transactions before they are mined in the block.
## What was done?
Fixed a condition "is an addr relay" to "not a block relay".
It's an alternate solution for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6162
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested with hashengineering - it works!
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK [3468ab3](3468ab34d1); no diff
kwvg:
utACK 3468ab34d1
Tree-SHA512: 6ad257a72be0f2fd4d7a8e3674d537e2a2c5f0c7c1bdfdf825403d8cb2975261bcf4574949fb02a16de76762d3f30b40e094be448cfa4ee6bae9f1f5be5f44d5
9178e8a75f feat: add smob and provenance in release for dockerhub; use jammy; apt remove as possible (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Docker provenance refers to the origin and history of Docker images, including how they were built, modified, and by whom. An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a detailed list of all components in a software application, providing transparency about libraries, dependencies, and versions used, which is crucial for security and compliance.
## What was done?
Add SBOM and provenance to docker build; this may allow some level of validation that GitHub actions is actually doing what it says it is.
See this for more information https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/attestations/
## How Has This Been Tested?
Building with buildx with sbom and provenance flags locally
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 9178e8a75f
Tree-SHA512: 6e3f35a0b30f002e2d5d80d6dd18ee554a1c15c62c1d4cbe1185f38977f55a199998515cf5bb9a027670f068f3d56ef33faa062d8c4122a886375d00afe6bf2f
