9a9d0d5b79 feat: drop SPORK 24 (EHF) so far as this feature works on testnet / mainnet (Konstantin Akimov)
da0dc06eea perf: optimize feature_mnehf.py by generating less blocks (Konstantin Akimov)
0de3923b06 feat: bury fork mn_rr (masternode reward reallocation) (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
MN_RR is activated on mainnet: time to bury it!
## What was done?
Hard-fork mn_rr is buried. Prior fixes are done here: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6270 and https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6269
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
light ACK 9a9d0d5b79
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 9a9d0d5b79
Tree-SHA512: 73ea0ca1270f15f6f1193efbaf402d476c84e9a843af85b7eae3e40199f4c943ad40f58e062b8db20e1c5c69c1a85579ebaf0722f1044ee2e1a4e7f96c58e645
51e1170f8f merge bitcoin#24324: refactor: remove unneeded bytes<->hex conversions in `byte_to_base58` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
473ee8ef18 merge bitcoin#24195: Fix failfast option for functional test runner (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
64dd46764c merge bitcoin#23799: Let test_runner.py start multiple jobs per timeslot (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
1b241a2832 merge bitcoin#23392: move check_node_connections to util (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
f6fa0c06b8 merge bitcoin#23501: various feature_nulldummy.py improvements (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
851dae7b29 merge bitcoin#23210: Replace satoshi_round with int() or Decimal() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
739394df18 merge bitcoin#23209: Avoid RPC roundtrip in MiniWallet get_descriptor() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c96b9aa3d9 merge bitcoin#23102: Add missing re.escape() to feature_addrman test (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
4db9108b74 merge bitcoin#23047: Use MiniWallet in mempool_persist (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
234f22a72e merge bitcoin#23037: fix confusing off-by-one nValue in feature_coinstatsindex.py (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 51e1170f8f
UdjinM6:
utACK 51e1170f8f
Tree-SHA512: 54ffbb2a44ad411d8602a7a752a05527faa65199da6cfa585f953892017c4d9e906c86c0b5b5e5d151d76eb0649aa76a7d17104ab0b3797a111d364ca52d716b
40f2ab906c test: don't attempt to reconnect already connected nodes (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
4a0fc8b69e test: don't attempt to (dis)connect nodes to/from themselves (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6276
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 40f2ab906c
Tree-SHA512: aaaeedabeb6b8ef77187fc14db1888c39863daf66afda93b8c8bc1dbbdf3ff6734445fd296d5b1034da6104e2d7cfcacf26b97b7be0a697b7a99f3671b6cb9a2
1e17b74207 test: no longer connect nodes in parallel in `start_masternodes` (UdjinM6)
be72ef5592 test: use `setmnthreadactive` to get controlable `connect_nodes` behaviour (UdjinM6)
e2ed82a7ae feat(rpc): introduce `setmnthreadactive` (regtest-only) (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This adds a new rpc command to enable/disable automatic masternode connections creation. We need this for #6276. 1e17b74207 is extracted from ede1833ba4 to avoid multiple jobs calling `setmnthreadactive` on the same node in parallel.
## What was done?
Add `setmnthreadactive` rpc and use it
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
kwvg:
LGTM, ACK 1e17b74207
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 1e17b74207
Tree-SHA512: 83c1c07d0066e26202fd21942a09e41c3560c4d32229b44390946c4acb22319b32aa61a13b9106d20fc8cc197dd2a8ab5fdfcfdeaf3da76af062fc0fd7646972
874ef8cda2 fix: mine_quorum_no_checks -> mine_quorum_less_checks: do some checks to make sure quorums are mined correctly (UdjinM6)
4f636f47b4 fix: re-order functional tests: move governance to 60+seconds category (Konstantin Akimov)
fe49f3f178 refactor: removed dead and commented code from test_framework.py (Konstantin Akimov)
cd1958c82a perf: removed sleep(6) from mine_cycle_quorum in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
3f17a01a83 fix: bump mocktime in simplepose when generating blocks to improve robustness (Konstantin Akimov)
132d95e651 perf: remove sleep(1) from each step of quorum creation in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
4c57ad1c05 chore: increase batch size from 10 to 50 for faster block generation in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Functional tests take too long time to run.
(PR is recreated from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6268 because CI is broken)
## What was done?
- increased robustness `feature_llmq_simplepose.py` by adding missing bump for mocktime during block generations
- removed sleep(1) from each stage of mine_quorum
- removed sleep(6) from final stage of mine_cycled_quorum
- size of batch for block generation in `feature_asset_locks.py` and in `activate_fork_by_name()` increased from 10 blocks to 50 blocks
- moved governance's functional tests to "60 seconds+" category because they always the last one to wait if running more than 10 jobs at once
Plus extra refactoring which removes dead and commented code from test_framework.py
## How Has This Been Tested?
Locally, the functional tests speed up with these fixes for 15% for overall time and 20% for accumulated time
`test/functional/test_runner.py -j20`
Before:
```
ALL | ✓ Passed | 7860 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 481 s
```
After:
```
ALL | ✓ Passed | 6237 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 416 s
```
---
CI tsan job speeds up for 5 minutes in absolute time (~5%) and 1000 seconds in accumulated time.
```
ALL | ✓ Passed | 23854 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 6249 s
```
↑ [old version](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7822664869) vs [new version](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7825461091) ↓
```
ALL | ✓ Passed | 22901 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 5962 s
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 874ef8cda2
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 874ef8cda2
Tree-SHA512: 514fa2fb32abd59c90f63b68fccc8c3d3b6d16b0b6ad7459c4a348825815e7d3012177565dea1f70b8a1f28ede1a297f91361365454d1be85955e77260451cf5
073d6d6b2a Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23723: test: Replace hashlib.new with named constructor (MarcoFalke)
674dcf9a55 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23547: Bugfix: RPC/mining: Fail properly in estimatesmartfee if smart fee data is unavailable (MarcoFalke)
546e548755 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24153: test: remove unused sanitizer suppressions (fanquake)
78b06a4dd2 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23591: refactor: Use underlying type of isminetype for isminefilter (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
backporting
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 073d6d6b2a
knst:
utACK 073d6d6b2a
Tree-SHA512: 5c5af5b795ec86f2b98cf9884e1275b8d3a5e7942f8b6632d74ecb799b1b7fe34071c052ac9af15abac14bad1b886ead5d0478f5e03fe0b461b7b40a7defef9e
4e621037c5 test: move `EXPECTED_STDERR_NO_GOV`{`_PRUNE`} and use it more (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
77ce6af5c1 chore: remove ancient setting migration logic (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
061aa05cf0 chore: remove old llmq db migration code (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
438cb85ece ci: set UBSan to halt on error and provide more information (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
3a1743fc7f trivial: avoid unneeded copy when iterating through `mapDenomCount` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
cba650953a test: simplify `pow_test`'s `get_next_work` block index construction (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
dacf859218 refactor: make `pdsNotificationInterface` a `unique_ptr`, rename (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
Collection of miscellaneous changes collected from work on earlier pull requests that don't fit into pull requests in the immediate future but are nonetheless useful.
## Checklist
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
re-utACK 4e621037c5
UdjinM6:
utACK 4e621037c5
Tree-SHA512: 5af4e5afdc34840905ffbf375f53cb12b682053cc135ff190dd02d245da9903a7f3e6af6fb1f1727546bf5034cbe42243477342f775e05d15bcfc5d5957616e9
It significantly improve speed of forks activation because reduces overhead for block generations
Bigger batch size can cause time-outs for RPC for tsan job (time-out is 30 seconds)
48c7f98b1a doc: drop trailing whitespace (pasta)
697743d77b test: add missing import (UdjinM6)
cfe99fd289 docs: add release notes for 6239 (pasta)
a6bbaacfaa fix: GetHeadersLimit is used for getheaders(2) and headers(2), refactor it to accept `compressed` instead of `msg_type` (UdjinM6)
b224f3f6ca bump p2p_version in tests (PastaPastaPasta)
b423f42aae refactor: sort imports (UdjinM6)
f6c68ba71b refactor: simplify _compute_requested_block_headers (UdjinM6)
07876b2c4a use `MAX_HEADERS_UNCOMPRESSED_RESULT` not `MAX_HEADERS_UNCOMPRESSED_RESULTS` ; use `MAX_HEADERS_UNCOMPRESSED_RESULT` in RPC to avoid breaking changes (pasta)
b137280df4 change to _COMPRESSED or _UNCOMPRESSED (pasta)
303bc7af99 fix: increase it for headers2 only (UdjinM6)
e23410ffdd trivial: rename `MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS_NEW` to `MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
bcf0320691 trivial: move the headers limit determination to `GetHeadersLimit()` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
993c7c0f90 feat: increase the number of block headers able to be downloaded at once to 8000 in protocol version `70234` (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We did some testing quite a while ago that found that sending 8000 headers at a time could speed stuff up. But we wanted to wait until compressed headers were implemented. Well, they've been implemented!
## What was done?
Bump 2000 -> 8000 triggered by protocol version
## How Has This Been Tested?
Hasn't, we should setup a few nodes running this and sync them from each other
## Breaking Changes
New protocol version, not breaking but should add notes? I should probably add release notes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
light ACK 48c7f98b1a
knst:
utACK 48c7f98b1a
Tree-SHA512: 54c68b9496131ab7f32504d44398d776a151df809d0120d093bbabb18904a783bd9b58796820209f5d75552df5476e30eaa09d68f7c5057882f94b5766a64f4c
fa1b63c01887adff83f16b1bbba3bd159dc51104 test: Replace hashlib.new with named constructor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A small refactor that doesn't matter too much, but it using the named constructor is nice because:
* It clarifies that it is a built-in function
* It is (trivially) faster and less code.
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
ACK fa1b63c01887adff83f16b1bbba3bd159dc51104
w0xlt:
ACK fa1b63c
Tree-SHA512: d23dc4552c1e6fc1f90f8272e47e4efcbe727f0b66a6f6a264db8a50ee6cb6d57a2809befcb95fda6725136672268633817a03dd1859f2298d20e3f9e0ca4a7f
`fBlocksOnly` has not been renamed as Dash uses the inv system for
relaying far more than transaction data and the blocklist of invs in
block-relay-only mode extends beyond what is conveyed by `reject_tx_invs`
`p2p_ibd_txrelay.py` was introduced in bitcoin#19423 but not backported
as Dash doesn't have feefilter capabilities but this backport has the
test check for additional cases which are within Dash's capabilities, so
the test has been committed in with the feefilter portions minimally
stripped out
ef4d74a669 test: remove dead code from `p2p_initial_headers_sync.py` to favor of disable mocktime (UdjinM6)
4d9837c21e refactor: add a new flag disable_mocktime to set_test_params() (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
To disable mocktime you should re-implement setup_nodes(). It seems as bug-friendly solution
## What was done?
This PR introduce a new flag "disable_mocktime" which can be set in `set_test_params`.
It seems more error prune and the code is shorter
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests including future changes from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6235
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK ef4d74a669
kwvg:
utACK ef4d74a669
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK ef4d74a669
Tree-SHA512: c6be8002cae4d7824e150938957464c156931d0b6f7fc41c430a83d662865431f1b56cb11df73f56db54a140f36b0addd68b2917e25c5c941fae52e8d322bc25
be5c84f41d Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22089: test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (MarcoFalke)
247141d32c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22210: test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
dad3ae3f33 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22130: test: refactor: dedup utility function chain_transaction() (MarcoFalke)
9dff334f47 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#361: Fix gui segfault caused by bitcoin/bitcoin#22216 (Hennadii Stepanov)
1087849955 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22216: refactor: Make SetupServerArgs callable without NodeContext (MarcoFalke)
fd94de6888 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21178: test: run mempool_reorg.py even with wallet disabled (MarcoFalke)
f1f5723fcf fix: missing changes from bitcoin#14123 (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Regular backports from bitcoin v22
## What was done?
See commits for list of backported changes. It also have some missing changes from bitcoin#14123
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK be5c84f41d
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK be5c84f41d
Tree-SHA512: 553ffde63c8409799cf6b3b87bf1ee285fbf58b13c08d04cdac29bc0e4dd75059feaa2f163803084ae85175397512517b68a6e0e0cc602d981f38ac70d96e393
accf3d5868460b4b14ab607fd66ac985b086fbb3 [test] mempool package ancestor/descendant limits (glozow)
2b6b26e57c24d2f0abd442c1c33098e3121572ce [test] parameterizable fee for make_chain and create_child_with_parents (glozow)
313c09f7b7beddfdb74c284720d209c81dfdb94f [test] helper function to increase transaction weight (glozow)
f8253d69d6f02850995a11eeb71fedc22e6f6575 extract/rename helper functions from rpc_packages.py (glozow)
3cd663a5d33aa7ef87994e452bced7f192d021a0 [policy] ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
c6e016aa139c8363e9b38bbc1ba0dca55700b8a7 [mempool] check ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
f551841d3ec080a2d7a7988c7b35088dff6c5830 [refactor] pass size/count instead of entry to CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (glozow)
97dd1c729d2bbedf9527b914c0cc8267b8a7c21b MOVEONLY: add helper function for calculating ancestors and checking limits (glozow)
f95bbf58aaf72aab8a9c5827b1f162f3b8ac38f4 misc package validation doc improvements (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR implements a function to calculate mempool ancestors for a package and enforces ancestor/descendant limits on them as a whole. It reuses a portion of `CalculateMemPoolAncestors()`; there's also a small refactor to move the reused code into a generic helper function. Instead of calculating ancestors and descendants on every single transaction in the package and their ancestors, we use a "worst case" heuristic, treating every transaction in the package as each other's ancestor and descendant. This may overestimate everyone's counts, but is still pretty accurate in the our main package use cases, in which at least one of the transactions in the package is directly related to all the others (e.g. 1 parent + 1 child, multiple parents with 1 child, or chains).
Note on Terminology: While "package" is often used to describe groups of related transactions _within_ the mempool, here, I only use package to mean the group of not-in-mempool transactions we are currently validating.
#### Motivation
It would be a potential DoS vector to allow submission of packages to mempool without a proper guard for mempool ancestors/descendants. In general, the purpose of mempool ancestor/descendant limits is to limit the computational complexity of dealing with families during removals and additions. We want to be able to validate multiple transactions on top of the mempool, but also avoid these scenarios:
- We underestimate the ancestors/descendants during package validation and end up with extremely complex families in our mempool (potentially a DoS vector).
- We expend an unreasonable amount of resources calculating everyone's ancestors and descendants during package validation.
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
utACK accf3d5
ariard:
ACK accf3d5.
Tree-SHA512: 0d18ce4b77398fe872e0b7c2cc66d3aac2135e561b64029584339e1f4de2a6a16ebab3dd5784f376e119cbafc4d50168b28d3bd95d0b3d01158714ade2e3624d
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
1f4e1a17ed test: add test for governance inv expiration (UdjinM6)
06b4dba0d3 feat: make CInv python implementation aware of governance invs (UdjinM6)
c7c930ece6 fix: use correct condition in logs (UdjinM6)
d41d87a5be fix: use `std::chrono::seconds` (UdjinM6)
d6fe7146ff chore: make clang-format and linter happy (UdjinM6)
b57a9220c1 refactor: sqash 2 hash maps into one, use proper naming (UdjinM6)
4116ba3253 fix: let internal govobj/vote inv request trackers expire after 60 sec (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Another issue noticed during recent sb voting period. Lots of inv are coming from peers that never send the object/vote they announced. Let's not wait for these forever, 60 seconds should be enough.
## What was done?
Add a "timer" to each request.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, run a MN on mainnet and check logs.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 1f4e1a17ed
Tree-SHA512: f5c5a896f61b5aed27c6f42c926254156c604edb4efd2a3cd3738a7e8d1ed7bafffadc584148e4a5c1a172c2b3d61a06884a1f6d56eb4ebe37a4b0dbc050edd6
d6d2ab984547be4a9f7ba859a2a4c9ac9bfbf206 test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce024b1c0ef2dcd307023aaaab40373c8bf17db1 test: MiniWallet: force P2PK signature to have fixed size (71 bytes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #21945. It aims to both fix the fee calculation for P2PK mode transactions and enable its vsize check. Currently, the latter assumes a fixed tx length, which is fine for anyone-can-spend txs but doesn't apply to P2PK output spends due to varying DER signature size; the vsize check is therefore disabled for P2PK mode on master branch.
Creating one million DER signatures with MiniWallet shows the following distribution of sizes (smart people with better math skills probably could deduce the ratios without trying, but hey):
| DER signature size [bytes] | #occurences (ratio) |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| 71 | 498893 (49.89%) |
| 70 | 497244 (49.72%) |
| 69 | 3837 (0.38%) |
| 68 | 22 (0.0022%) |
Note that even smaller signatures are possible (for smaller R and S values with leading zero bytes), it's just that the probability decreases exponentially. Instead of choosing a large vsize check range and hoping that smaller signatures are never created (potentially leading to flaky tests), the proposed solution is ~~to limit the signature size to the two most common sizes 71 and 70 (>99.6% probability) and then accordingly only check for two vsize values; the value to be used for fee calculation is a decimal right between the two possible sizes (167.5 vbytes) and for the vsize check it's rounded down/up integer values are used.~~ to simply grind the signature to a fixed size of 71 bytes (49.89% probability, i.e. on average each call to `sign_tx()`, on average two ECC signing operations are needed).
~~The idea of grinding signatures to a fixed size (similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666 which grinds to low-R values) would be counter-productive, as the signature creation in the test suite is quite expensive and this would significantly slow down tests that calculate hundreds of signatures (like e.g. feature_csv_activation.py).~~
For more about transaction sizes on different input/output types, see the following interesting article: https://medium.com/coinmonks/on-bitcoin-transaction-sizes-97e31bc9d816
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK d6d2ab984547be4a9f7ba859a2a4c9ac9bfbf206
Tree-SHA512: 011c70ee0e4adf9ba12902e4b6c411db9ae96bdd8bc810bf1d67713367998e28ea328394503371fc1f5087a819547ddaea56c073b28db893ae1c0031d7927f32
fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a test: Run pep-8 on touched test (MarcoFalke)
fab7e99c2a4b02a41b7448b45f0e6cdfdbb53ac3 test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
fab871f649e3da4a5a5f6cffac3fc748bb1ca900 test: Remove unused generate() from test (MarcoFalke)
faff3f35b778d9af3d649b303d7edab49bfe40b4 test: Add txin.sequence option to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This comes with nice benefits:
* Less code and complexity
* Test can be run without wallet compiled in
Also add some additional checks for `getmempoolentry` (#22209) and other cleanups 🎨
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Tested ACK fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a thanks for the explanations, nicely done
theStack:
ACK fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a 🍷
Tree-SHA512: 0e9b8fe985779d8d7034d256deed627125bb374b6ae2972c461b3a220739a51061c6147ad69339bee16282f82716c7f3f8a7a89c693ceb1e47ea50709272332a
