* Added quorum listextended
* Indentation fix
* Added release notes
* Added quorum listextended func test
* Refactored reply into map
* fix: change type from ARR to OBJ_DYN to properly print out the placeholder
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* llmq: move initialization logic to 'LLMQContext', add unique pointer to NodeContext
* llmq: add aliases to LLMQ globals, expose them to RPC via LLMQContext
* rpc: replace most global invocations with LLMQContext aliases
* rpc: replace quorum RPC global invocations with LLMQContext aliases
* llmq: replace individual global member arguments with context pointer
* llmq: pass aliased context pointer instead of individual globals in tests
* llmq: move BLS worker to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move DKG debug manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move DKG session manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move quorum share manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move quorum signing manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq only logging
* llmq only logging
* style: reference on the left
* refactoring
* fix
* style: fix colon location in for loop
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
facb71576cd4d2e90fd03e09d29b42fa3d730e8c net: Remove forcerelay of rejected txs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the code that supposedly handled the forced relay of txs from a permissioned peer that were rejected from our mempool. The removal should be fine, because it is dead code for the following reasons:
* While `RelayTransaction` enqueues the inv for all peers, the inv is never processed because it can not be found in the mempool. See 4a07233076/src/net_processing.cpp (L3862-L3866)
* Even if the peers we intended to send the inv to can somehow reply with a getdata to the never-received inv, they won't receive the tx as a reply because it was never added to the "relay memory" (`mapRelay`)
The dead code is (obviously) untested: https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/total.coverage/src/net_processing.cpp.gcov.html#2574
This feature was (intentionally or accidentally) removed in 4d8993b346, which was released in Bitcoin Core 0.13.0. So all currently supported versions of Bitcoin Core ship without this feature. I am not aware of any complaints about this feature or actual documented use-cases. So instead of reviving an unneeded feature, just remove the dead code.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK facb71576cd4d2e90fd03e09d29b42fa3d730e8c, locally running the unit and functional tests.
Tree-SHA512: bfceae6f2983c1510fa0649a9a63c343cbbc1c4ab3a3698039cccf454c81e58c8f5114b147ed42a1bc867da74c43a5b53764ab14f942e191b6f59079044108b5
0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82 Add static_asserts to ser_X_to_Y() methods (Samer Afach)
be94096dfb0c4862e2314cbae4120d7360b08ef2 Fix a violation of C++ standard rules that unions cannot be switched. (Samer Afach)
Pull request description:
Type punning in C++ is not like C. As per the C++ standard, one cannot use unions to convert the bit type. A discussion about this can be found [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25664848/unions-and-type-punning). In C++, a union is supposed to only hold one type at a time. It's intended to be used only as `std::variant`. Switching types is undefined behavior.
In fact, C++20 has a special casting function, called [`bit_cast`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/bit_cast) that solved this problem.
Why has it been working so far? Because some compilers tolerate using unions and switching types, like gcc. More information [here](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#Type-punning).
One important thing to mention is that performance is generally not affected by that memcpy. Compilers are smart enough to convert that to a memory cast when possible. But we have to do it the right way, otherwise, it's jut undefined behavior that depends on the compiler.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
elichai:
ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
kristapsk:
ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
Tree-SHA512: f6e89de39fc964750429139bab6b5a1346f7060334b7afa020e315bdad8f8c195bce2b8a9e343f06e7fff175e2dfb1cdabfcb6fe405bea0febe4962f0cc62557
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041 util: Avoid potential uninitialized read in FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t nTime) by checking gmtime_s/gmtime_r return value (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid potential uninitialized read in `FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t)` by checking `gmtime_s`/`gmtime_r` return value.
Before this patch `FormatISO8601DateTime(67768036191676800)` resulted in:
```
==5930== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==5930== at 0x4F44C0A: std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::_M_insert_int<long>(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25)
==5930== by 0x4F511A4: std::ostream& std::ostream::_M_insert<long>(long) (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25)
==5930== by 0x4037C3: void tinyformat::formatValue<int>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, int const&) (tinyformat.h:358)
==5930== by 0x403725: void tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::formatImpl<int>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, void const*) (tinyformat.h:543)
==5930== by 0x402E02: tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::format(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int) const (tinyformat.h:528)
==5930== by 0x401B16: tinyformat::detail::formatImpl(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::detail::FormatArg const*, int) (tinyformat.h:907)
==5930== by 0x4017AE: tinyformat::vformat(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::FormatList const&) (tinyformat.h:1054)
==5930== by 0x401765: void tinyformat::format<int, int, int, int, int, int>(std::ostream&, char const*, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&) (tinyformat.h:1064)
==5930== by 0x401656: std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > tinyformat::format<int, int, int, int, int, int>(char const*, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&) (tinyformat.h:1073)
==5930== by 0x4014CC: FormatISO8601DateTime[abi:cxx11](long) (…)
```
The same goes for other very large positive and negative arguments.
Fix by simply checking the `gmtime_s`/`gmtime_r` return value :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041
theStack:
re-ACK 12a2f37718
elichai:
re ACK 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041
Tree-SHA512: 066142670d9bf0944d41fa3f3c702b1a460b5471b93e76a619b1e818ff9bb9c09fe14c4c37e9536a04c99533f7f21d1b08ac141e1b829ff87ee54c80d0e61d48
bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678 scripted-diff: Wallet: Rename incorrectly named *UsedDestination (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
These functions are used to mark/check if a key of our own has been used to spend (and only for avoid-reuse wallets), which has nothing to do with the destination/address itself.
Give them more accurate names to avoid confusion.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/UsedDestination/SpentKey/g' $(git grep -l 'UsedDestination' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678 -- patch looks correct and rationale makes sense
instagibbs:
ACK bca8665d08, much more meaningful name, thanks
kallewoof:
ACK bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678
Tree-SHA512: ff13d9061ffa748e92eb41ba962c3ec262a43e4b6abd62408b38c6f650395d6ae5851554257d1900fb02767a88d08380d592a27210192ee9abb72d0945976686
* refactor: add more [[nodiscard]]
* refactor: drop unneeded .get()
* refactor: use functional style int cast
* refactor: use std::numeric_limits::max()
* refactor: use GetRand instead of GetRandInt
* refactor/fix: use the shared_ptr<CWallet> where possible instead of getting the underlying pointer
This is also a fix in regards to the rpcevo.cpp file where the old code could result in a dangling pointer that could result in a crash as the shared_ptr we get back is discarded while the underlying ptr is still being used
* refactor: remove unneeded line
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff379131a01e4e9f9648b150e806104a23795 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e20f881c843a9219e48cec202e962f8 wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96 rpc: Deprecate getunconfirmedbalance and getwalletinfo balances (MarcoFalke)
999931cf8f167c7547f1015cdf05437a460c27f0 rpc: Add getbalances RPC (MarcoFalke)
fad13e925e197163a942f3f0d1ba2c95a2b65a56 rpcwallet: Make helper methods const on CWallet (MarcoFalke)
fad40ec9151248c6e8225e14980424f581d23e02 wallet: Use IsValidNumArgs in getwalletinfo rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes the `CWallet::GetBalance()` struct over RPC.
In the future, incorrectly named rpcs such as `getunconfirmedbalance` or rpcs redundant to this such as `getbalance` could be removed.
ACKs for commit facfb4:
jnewbery:
utACK facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96
Tree-SHA512: 1f54fedce55df9a8ea82d2b6265354b39a956072621876ebaee2355aac0e23c7b64340c3279502415598c095858529e18b50789be956250aafda1cd3a8d948a5
