fa30d5282cb07b6de0160d7df8b649332db97dde doc: Remove label from good first issue template (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Good first issues aren't that frequent that manually assigning the label is a problem, but this fixes the spam problem (e.g. https://twitter.com/GoodFirstIssues/status/1295455089491161088 )
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa30d5282cb07b6de0160d7df8b649332db97dde
Tree-SHA512: 59e7c707637cc328e2443c2b7e5d2c82ef151739ad5afb6cea1a60501318dc8c4c81c95591eed8172581ac99d43cf826dcdd547e096eff1038137853af67a975
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
see warnings in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/actions/runs/5462770856
## What was done?
https://github.blog/changelog/2022-10-11-github-actions-deprecating-save-state-and-set-output-commands/
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. not all binaries were covered with checksums
2. there were no checksums for archives
## What was done?
add missing checksums, also group and sort them
## How Has This Been Tested?
run commands after local guix build
see this PR results
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Automated guix builds in CI when specifically requested
## What was done?
Any PR with the `build-guix` label added will automatically have the
Guix build ran and the hashes placed in the CI output to compare against
## How Has This Been Tested?
This PR
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
small cleanups and improvements
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
see
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/actions/runs/4715728701/jobs/8362893373?pr=5330
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This adds a check that ensures branches merge cleanly into master via a
ff-only
## What was done?
Added a GitHub action created via gpt-4 :)
## How Has This Been Tested?
https://github.com/PastaPastaPasta/dash/actions/runs/4703432752/jobs/8341923994
and
https://github.com/PastaPastaPasta/dash/actions/runs/4703457936/jobs/8341980146
for expected pass and expected fail
## Breaking Changes
None, should be back ported to v19.x branch when we get the chance.
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
fabca7756d6908ad581f3a699f1be6ecc9f62e03 doc: Add issue templates for bug and feature request (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16627
Can be tested via https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin/issues
ACKs for top commit:
jb55:
ACK fabca7756d6908ad581f3a699f1be6ecc9f62e03
fanquake:
ACK fabca7756d6908ad581f3a699f1be6ecc9f62e03
Tree-SHA512: 1ebe58f9c0110a9332adf1d80001cd9ed6fe60208e387c93b8564dc66821f753e34b23cb6f4cae45168024862ee884913976e132820b7a4759fa6391b0d1127c
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently template for "New pull request" have a lot of instruction that
are formatted as comments by html/markdown tag.
It makes this instruction to append in the final commit message when
pull request is merged because they are invisible for reviewer (marked
as comment).
With new template the messages would be more likely to be cleaned up
before merging.
## What was done?
Replaced commented text in template to cursive test (italic)
## How Has This Been Tested?
By clicking "Preview" on GitHub
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes, it's trivial change
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
* docs: indicate conventional commit syntax should be used for PRs
* feat: add config file for semantic PR GH app
Requires installation of https://probot.github.io/apps/semantic-pull-requests/
* docs: mention added backport type
* introduce handle_potential_conflicts.py to only warn on true conflicts. Fail CI when there is a conflict
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* remove unneeded input assign
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* use dashpay instead of PastaPastaPasta
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Update .github/workflows/handle_potential_conflicts.py
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* more linter fixes
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* use pull_request_target instead of pull_request
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* use pasta based action 0.1.1
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
79f0a3f1f42e0421e60cf9a57f6c70c6be9221a1 Get more info about GUI-related issue on Linux (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
There is bunch of combinations Linux Distro (Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu etc) + Desktop Environment (GNOME, KDE, Xfce etc) + Graphical Shell (Unity, GNOME Shell etc).
This PR adds related requests to the issue template. Providing such data will make GUI-related issue reviewing and reproducing easier.
Tree-SHA512: 9728d7826108b62a916c43523572d1da1b52b43a21b3d550a84225ff67951224e0b8a9394627f274d7c65383b3f526bcd12cc40eef9d7fec174c19d1abf333d8
faede70882b4fd54390f5205dbe1dbcf019195c8 doc: Add formatting to the good first issue template (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Add minor formatting to the good first issue template so that it is easier to see with one glance what the required skills are.
Preview is here: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/new/choose
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK faede70882b4fd54390f5205dbe1dbcf019195c8
Tree-SHA512: 0b0fcd051166981455061442e69f42c9fa726eaa228856e57434e012f7224781f4f3f12c31ce0a7a322df9999e79a8fbe63bf800b7933bc52c7cdaed90f37598
7b78b8d3a64503d582af8298241a20ebf582a0c5 doc: Add template for good first issues (Michael Folkson)
Pull request description:
closes#17317
Attempted to address everyone's suggestions in #17317 without making it too long. The first half is for the benefit of the individual opening the issue and the second half is for the benefit of the new contributor. Ideally we don't want the second half to be deleted by the individual opening the issue but whether they delete the first half or not isn't really a concern
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7b78b8d3a64503d582af8298241a20ebf582a0c5
jonatack:
ACK 7b78b8d3a64503d582af8298241a20ebf582a0c5
Tree-SHA512: 5874b244a52f432637600a73aac493972971568f8d8af10aa731b8a6b221566015827dd82c310c60a76fb01140c3bc56a691206c3442018611c820d4b98d104f
203a67d21f566634165531a7a75c3f8c9f9c9d6a doc: Put PR template in comments (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This prevents the common annoyance of the text being included into PRs
accidentally.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK 203a67d21f566634165531a7a75c3f8c9f9c9d6a
fanquake:
ACK 203a67d21f566634165531a7a75c3f8c9f9c9d6a - I make an effort to remove it whenever I see it in a PR.
Tree-SHA512: 3514d285488b7930d7f3d7f8823198d7325d8b7de57a6d8f13e559c0c23b30d58916b15782cbbdc347a375b418e9d0f7a5b99b34d26f3b957d7d5a03a3d83dfd
fae9e84cbb doc: Add GitHub pr template (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Bitcoin Core has a very thorough review process and even the most trivial change needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so patches often sit for a long time.
Authors should provide clear motivation for patches and explain how it improves Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience significantly.
Tree-SHA512: 83b379d75934089f13ba173e6ec847845f954f10f83e406ef9722836aa093170c612b4214f22cd5939d59f66a50f5d0e52aa0059423e8e7261bb176f1c546a08
* feat:add github actions
* add release tag
* multi-arch download
* remove erroneous add command
* install wget properly
* parse tag
* no multi-arch for now
* show vars
* more debug
* show uname
* install certs
* manually mutate tag
* fix syntax
* use env
* remove debug
* try docker meta
* try semver with v
* multi-arch
* remove v
* use tag-match
* match group 1
* prepare for dashpay repo
* optimize dockerfile
* remove unnecessary space
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update .github/workflows/release_docker_hub.yml
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
