sikkienl/dash
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git synced 2024-12-27 13:03:17 +01:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
24,393 Commits 24 Branches 554 Tags 576 MiB
917089d542
Commit Graph

1316 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konstantin Akimov
1ed7f0cca4 refactor: use DeploymentActiveAfter instead llmq::utils in rpc/ 2023-12-21 23:02:31 -06:00
PastaPastaPasta
acd2acd592
refactor: pass large structure by const reference on every RPC call (#5780) 2023-12-21 12:01:39 -06:00
UdjinM6
6fe36cc1cb
fix: Improve quorum caching (again) (#5761) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. `scanQuorumsCache` is a special one and we use it incorrectly.
2. Platform doesn't really use anything that calls `ScanQuorums()`
directly, they specify the exact quorum hash in RPCs so it's
`GetQuorum()` that is used instead. The only place `ScanQuorums()` is
used for Platform related stuff is `StartCleanupOldQuorumDataThread()`
because we want to preserve quorum data used by `GetQuorum()`. But this
can be optimised with its own (much more compact) cache.
3. RPCs that use `ScanQuorums()` should in most cases be ok with smaller
cache, for other use cases there is a note in help text now.

## What was done?
pls see individual commits

## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, run a node (~in progress~ looks stable)

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
 2023-12-20 09:54:00 -06:00
UdjinM6
9a99a4abdc
fix(rpc): pass blockhash into TxToJSON so that getspecialtxes could show correct instantlock/chainlock values (#5774) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`instantlock` and `chainlock` are broken in `getspecialtxes`

kudos to @thephez for finding the issue

## What was done?
pass the hash and also rename the variable to self-describing

## How Has This Been Tested?
run `getspecialtxes` on a node with and without the patch

## Breaking Changes
`instantlock` and `chainlock` will show actual values and not just
`false` all the time now (not sure if that qualifies for "breaking"
though)

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-12-19 07:43:36 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
3bc77a6e1d
feat(rpc): submit chainlock signature if needed RPC (#5765) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Once Platform is live, there could be an edge case where the CL could
arrive to an EvoNode faster through Platform quorum than regular P2P
propagation.

## What was done?
This PR introduces a new RPC `submitchainlock` with the following 3
mandatory parameters:
- `blockHash`, `signature` and `height`.

Besides some basic tests:
- If the block is unknown then the RPC returns an error (could happen if
the node is stucked)
- If the signature is not verified then the RPC return an error.
- If the node already has this CL, the RPC returns true.
- If the node doesn't have this CL, it inserts it, broadcast it through
the inv system and return true.

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_chainlocks.py` was modified with the following scenario:

1. node0 is isolated from the rest of the network
2. node1 mines a new block and waits for CL
3. Make sure node0 doesn't know the new block/CL (by checking
`getbestchainlock()`)
4. CL is submitted via the new RPC on node0
5. checking `getbestchainlock()` and make sure the CL was processed +
'known_block' is false
6. reconnect node0

## Breaking Changes
no

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-12-18 22:27:19 -06:00
MarcoFalke
09973f2bee Merge #20932: refactor: Replace fs::absolute calls with AbsPathJoin calls 
da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916 Replace fs::absolute calls with AbsPathJoin calls (Kiminuo)
66576c4fd532ac18b8b355ea93d25581a2c15654 test: Clear forced -walletdir setting after wallet init_tests (Kiminuo)

Pull request description:

  This adds better test coverage and will make it easier in #20744 to remove our dependency on the two-argument boost::filesystem::absolute() function which does not have a direct equivalent in C++17.

  This PR doesn't change behavior aside from adding an assert and fixing a test bug.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    Code review ACK da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916 only doxygen improvements since my last review per `git diff d867d7a da9caa1`
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916 📯
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916. Just comment and test tweaks since previous review.

Tree-SHA512: c940ee60f3ba374d4927cf34cf12d27c4c735c94af591fbc0ca408c641b30f8f8fbcfe521d66bfbddf9877a1fc8cd99bd8a47ebcd2fa59789de6bd87a7b9cf4d
 2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
d6d3e0905c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#19362: rpc/blockchain: Reset scantxoutset progress before inferring descriptors 
8c4129b4540f4f739413ed9a6fbfc78afc252f42 rpc: reset scantxoutset progress on finish (Pavol Rusnak)

Pull request description:

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19361 by moving resetting the `g_scan_progress` variable **before** inferring the descriptors

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    Code review ACK 8c4129b4540f4f739413ed9a6fbfc78afc252f42

Tree-SHA512: 2b81e5c930b9c201a1b9cc742c37e0617582326acd9adbd6b14991d33c05d51b1d5ff6a26f3accab7d274dc8c6a48bc8cbccf0811b60c1f76dd805f9b31482c0
 2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
da20789983 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#162: Add network to peers window and peer details 
e262a19b0ba07d8d2334551f49ca1577ab2999fc gui: display network in peer details (Jon Atack)
913695307360d3582f74ffe225cb122b2e48023d gui: rename peer tab column headers, initialize in .h (Hennadii Stepanov)
05c08c696a1bc45ab28abe6f82bebbdbd6239c23 gui: add network column in peers tab/window (Jon Atack)
e0e55060bf697fe8b9ed43ff62383a0451e9c0ce gui: fix broken doxygen formatting in src/qt/guiutil.h (Jon Atack)
0d5613f9ded846aa20a95c757672e9560c664c4c gui: create GUIUtil::NetworkToQString() utility function (Jon Atack)
af9103cc792e17f35249f1d4cb30f0d6958ceb75 net, rpc: change CNodeStats::m_network from string to Network (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  and rename peers window column headers from NodeId and Node/Service to Peer Id and Address.

  ![Screenshot from 2020-12-27 14-45-31](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2415484/103172228-efec8600-4849-11eb-8cee-04a3d2ab1273.png)

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK e262a19b0ba07d8d2334551f49ca1577ab2999fc

Tree-SHA512: 709c2a805c109c2dd033aca7b6b6dc94ebe2ce7a0168c71249e1e661c9c57d1f1c781a5b9ccf3b776bedeb83ae2fb5c505637337c45b1eb9a418cb1693a89761
 2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
MarcoFalke
cff1c7b2c3 Merge #21043: net: Avoid UBSan warning in ProcessMessage(...) 
3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b util: Disallow negative mocktime (MarcoFalke)
f5f2f9716885e7548809e77f46b493c896a019bf net: Avoid UBSan warning in ProcessMessage(...) (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Avoid UBSan warning in `ProcessMessage(...)`.

  Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20380#issuecomment-770427182 (thanks Crypt-iQ!)

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK 3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b only change is adding patch written by me
  ajtowns:
    ACK 3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b -- code review only

Tree-SHA512: e8d7af0457ca86872b75a4e406c0a93aafd841c2962e244e147e748cc7ca118c56be0fdafe53765f4b291410030b2c3cc8f76f733b37a955d34fc885ab6037b9
 2023-12-08 21:16:00 +03:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
3f77d2312f Merge #16525: Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv 
e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773 Additionally treat Tx.nVersion as unsigned in joinpsbts (Matt Corallo)
970de70bdd3542e75b73c79b06f143168c361494 Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv (Matt Corallo)

Pull request description:

  Consensus-wise we already treat it as an unsigned integer (the
  only rules around it are in CSV/locktime handling), but changing
  the underlying data type means touching consensus code for a
  simple cleanup change, which isn't really worth it.

  See-also, https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/299

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773
  practicalswift:
    ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773
  ajtowns:
    ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773 code review -- checked all other uses of tx.nVersion treat it as unsigned (except for policy.cpp:IsStandard anyway), so looks good.
  naumenkogs:
    ACK e80259f

Tree-SHA512: 6760a2c77e24e9e1f79a336ca925f9bbca3a827ce02003c71d7f214b82ed3dea13fa7d9f87df9b9445cd58dff8b44a15571d821c876f22f8e5a372a014c9976b
 2023-12-06 12:33:15 -06:00
fanquake
2da9982e55 Merge #17829: scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 
aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0 scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
  promag:
    ACK aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0 🎉
  fanquake:
    ACK aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0 - going to merge this now because the year is over and conflicts are minimal.

Tree-SHA512: 58cb1f53bc4c1395b2766f36fabc7e2332e213780a802762fff0afd59468dad0c3265f553714d761c7a2c44ff90f7dc250f04458f4b2eb8eef8b94f8c9891321
 2023-12-06 11:40:14 -06:00
fanquake
da7ca00f03 Merge #18814: rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback 
9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef9f4e4603a7b1 rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback (João Barbosa)
a2e6db5c4f1bb52a8814102b628e51652493d06a rpc: Add mutex to guard deadlineTimers (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  This PR fixes an early relocking race condition from #18811 where old relock callback runs after new wallet unlock code and nRelockTime update but before rpcRunLater call, causing early relock and incorrect nRelockTime time

  Issue introduced in #18487.
  Fixes #18811.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef9f4e4603a7b1
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef9f4e4603a7b1. No changes since last review except squashing commits.
  jonatack:
    ACK 9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef

Tree-SHA512: 2f7fc03e5ab6037337f2d82dfad432495cc337c77d07c968ee2355105db6292f24543c03456f5402e0e759577a4327758f9372f7ea29de6d56dc3695fda9b379
 2023-12-05 12:47:47 -06:00
MarcoFalke
52c8ef2feb
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22263: refactor: wrap CCoinsViewCursor in unique_ptr 
7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977 doc: add comment about CCoinsViewDBCursor constructor (James O'Beirne)
0f8a5a4dd530549d37c43da52c923ac3b2af1a03 move-only(ish): don't expose CCoinsViewDBCursor (James O'Beirne)
615c1adfb07b9b466173166dc2e53ace540e4b32 refactor: wrap CCoinsViewCursor in unique_ptr (James O'Beirne)

Pull request description:

  I tripped over this one for a few hours at the beginning of the week, so I've sort of got a personal vendetta against `CCoinsView::Cursor()` returning a raw pointer.

  Specifically in the case of CCoinsViewDB, if a raw cursor is allocated and not freed, a cryptic leveldb assertion failure occurs on CCoinsViewDB destruction (`Assertion 'dummy_versions_.next_ == &dummy_versions_' failed.`).

  This is a pretty simple change.

  Related to: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21766
  See also: https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/142#issuecomment-414418135

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK 7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977 🔎
  jonatack:
    re-ACK 7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977 modulo suggestion
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977. Two new commits look good and thanks for clarifying constructor comment

Tree-SHA512: 6471d03e2de674d84b1ea0d31e25f433d52aa1aa4996f7b4aab1bd02b6bc340b15e64cc8ea07bbefefa3b5da35384ca5400cc230434e787c30931b8574c672f9
 2023-12-03 20:45:01 -06:00
MarcoFalke
fbddd23cd4 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22528: refactor: move GetTransaction to node/transaction.cpp 
f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f0882a1a2bb20474648419979af6e383d refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  ~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).

  In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.

  Relevant IRC log:
  ```
  17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
  17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
  17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
  17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
  17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
  17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
  17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
  17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
  17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
  17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
  17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
  ```

  The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    Code review ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
  rajarshimaitra:
    tACK f685a13bef
  mjdietzx:
    crACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
  LarryRuane:
    Code review, test ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec

Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
 2023-12-03 20:13:09 -06:00
MarcoFalke
ad3086c629 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22383: rpc: Prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction 
78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction (Jameson Lopp)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #22382

  Motivation: prevent excessive disk reads if txindex is enabled.

  Worth noting that this could be argued to be less of a bug and more of an issue of undefined behavior. If a user calls GetTransaction with the wrong block hash, what should happen?

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
  theStack:
    Code review ACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
  LarryRuane:
    tACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
  luke-jr:
    utACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
  jnewbery:
    utACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
  rajarshimaitra:
    Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
  lsilva01:
    Code Review ACK and Tested ACK 78f4c8b98e on Ubuntu 20.04

Tree-SHA512: af7db5b98cb2ae4897b28476b2fa243bf7e6f850750d9347062fe8013c5720986d1a3c808f80098e5289bd84b085de03c81a44e584dc28982f721c223651bfe0
 2023-12-03 20:13:09 -06:00
MarcoFalke
06e467154f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22407: rpc: Return block time in getblockchaininfo 
20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364 rpc: Return block time in getblockchaininfo (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  Return tip time in `getblockchaininfo`, for some use cases this can save a call to `getblock`.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
  theStack:
    re-ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
  0xB10C:
    ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
  kristapsk:
    ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
  Zero-1729:
    re-ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364

Tree-SHA512: 29a920cfff1ef53e0af601c3f93f8f9171f3be47fc84b0fa293cb865b824976e8c1510b17b27d17daf0b8e658dd77d9dc388373395f0919fc4a23cd5019642d5
 2023-12-03 20:13:09 -06:00
MarcoFalke
d70ba2c0f7 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#19438: Introduce deploymentstatus 
e48826ad87b4f92261f7433e84f48dac9bd9e5c3 tests: remove ComputeBlockVersion shortcut from versionbits tests (Anthony Towns)
c5f36725e877d8eb492383844f8ef7535466b366 [refactor] Move ComputeBlockVersion into VersionBitsCache (Anthony Towns)
4a69b4dbe0d7f504811b67c399da7e6d11e4f805 [move-only] Move ComputeBlockVersion from validation to versionbits (Anthony Towns)
0cfd6c6a8f929d5567ac41f95c21548f115efee5 [refactor] versionbits: make VersionBitsCache a full class (Anthony Towns)
8ee3e0bed5bf2cd3c7a68ca6ba6c65f7b9a72cca [refactor] rpc/blockchain.cpp: SoftForkPushBack (Anthony Towns)
92f48f360da5f425428b761219301f509826bec4 deploymentinfo: Add DeploymentName() (Anthony Towns)
ea68b3a5729f5d240e968388c4f88acffeb27228 [move-only] Rename versionbitsinfo to deploymentinfo (Anthony Towns)
c64b2c6a0f79369624ae96b2e3d579d50aae4de6 scripted-diff: rename versionbitscache (Anthony Towns)
de55304f6e7a8b607e6b3fc7436de50910747b0c [refactor] Add versionbits deployments to deploymentstatus.h (Anthony Towns)
2b0d291da8f479739ff394dd92801da8c40b9f8e [refactor] Add deploymentstatus.h (Anthony Towns)
eccd736f3dc231ac0306ca763c3b72cf8247230a versionbits: Use dedicated lock instead of cs_main (Anthony Towns)
36a4ba0aaaa9b35185d7178994e36bc02cca9887 versionbits: correct doxygen comments (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  Introduces helper functions to make it easy to bury future deployments, along the lines of the suggestion from [11398](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11398#issuecomment-335599326) "I would prefer it if a buried deployment wouldn't require all code paths that check the BIP9 status to require changing".

  This provides three functions: `DeploymentEnabled()` which tests if a deployment can ever be active, `DeploymentActiveAt()` which checks if a deployment should be enforced in the given block, and `DeploymentActiveAfter()` which checks if a deployment should be enforced in the block following the given block, and overloads all three to work both with buried deployments and versionbits deployments.

  This adds a dedicated lock for the versionbits cache, which is acquired internally by the versionbits functions, rather than relying on `cs_main`. It also moves moves versionbitscache into deploymentstatus to avoid a circular dependency with validation.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK e48826ad87b4f92261f7433e84f48dac9bd9e5c3
  gruve-p:
    ACK e48826ad87
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK e48826ad87b4f92261f7433e84f48dac9bd9e5c3 🥈

Tree-SHA512: c846ba64436d36f8180046ad551d8b0d9e20509b9bc185aa2639055fc28803dd8ec2d6771ab337e80da0b40009ad959590d5772f84a0bf6199b65190d4155bed
 2023-12-01 09:08:50 -06:00
fanquake
f0d8627c87 Merge #18742: miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface 
7777f2a4bb1f9d843bc50a4e35085cfbb2808780 miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke)
fa5ceb25fce2200edf6b8ebfa6d4f01ed6774b95 test: Remove UninterruptibleSleep from test and replace it by SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (MarcoFalke)
fa770ce7fe67685c43780e219d8232efbee0bb8e validationinterface: Rework documentation, Rename pwalletIn to callbacks (MarcoFalke)
fab6d060ce5f580db538070beec1c5518c8c777c test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  When a validationinterface has itself unregistered in one thread, but is about to get executed in another thread [1], there is a race:

  * The validationinterface destructing itself
  * The validationinterface getting dereferenced for execution

  [1] 64139803f1/src/validationinterface.cpp (L82-L83)

  This happens in the miner. More generally it happens everywhere where at least one thread is generating notifications and another one is unregistering a validationinterface.

  This issue has been fixed in commit ab31b9d6fe7b39713682e3f52d11238dbe042c16, but the fix has not been applied to the miner.

  Example where this happened in practice: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675322230#L4414

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb1f9d843bc50a4e35085cfbb2808780.
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb1f9d843bc50a4e35085cfbb2808780

Tree-SHA512: 8087119243c71ba18a823a63515f3730d127162625d8729024278b447af29e2ff206f4840ee3d90bf84f93a2c5ab73b76c7e7044c83aa93b5b51047a166ec3d3
 2023-11-26 15:09:55 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
112564974d
refactor: deprecate non-deterministic IS support (#5553) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Non-deterministic IS locks aren't used anymore since v18 dip24.
We should drop that support to make code simpler.

## What was done?
Dropped non-deterministic IS code, `evo_instantsend_tests` and
`feature_llmq_is_migration.py` (don't need it anymore), adjusted func
tests.

## How Has This Been Tested?
all tests, synced Testnet

## Breaking Changes

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <545784+knst@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-11-20 10:17:04 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
216a5f7563
refactor: make MNActivationHeight in Params() indeed constant (#5658) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Addressed issues and comments from [PR
comment](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469#discussion_r1317886678)
and [PR
comment](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469#discussion_r1338704082)

`Params()` should be const; global variable `CMNHFManager` is a better
out-come.


## What was done?
The helpers and direct calls of `UpdateMNParams` for each block to
update non-constant member in `Params()` is not needed anymore. Instead
`CMNHFManager` takes cares about status of Signals for each block,
update them dynamically and save in evo db.


## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.

## Breaking Changes
Changed rpc `getblockchaininfo`. 
the field `ehf` changed meaning: it's now only a flag -1/0; but it is
introduced a new field `ehf_height` now that a height.


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-11-10 08:31:12 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
d910b3e465
chore(rpc): renamed from bitcoin to coins in help text (#5659) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented


## What was done?
Renamed `bitcoin` to `coins` in help texts of mining RPCs.

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes
no

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-11-03 09:06:02 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
a0c8c9f0a5
fix: possible assert call if nHeight in CDeterministicMNList is higher then Tip (#5590) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix: possible assert call if nHeight in CDeterministicMNListDiff is
higher than Tip
    
Example of new log:
```
2023-09-28T17:35:50Z GetProjectedMNPayeesAtChainTip WARNING pindex is nullptr due to height=914160 chain height=914159
```
    
instead assert call:
```
...
     #6  0x00007ffff7a33b86 in __assert_fail (assertion=0x55555783afd2 "pindex", file=0x5555577f2ed8 "llmq/utils.cpp", line=730,
            function=0x5555577f2448 "bool llmq::utils::IsMNRewardReallocationActive(const CBlockIndex*)") at ./assert/assert.c:101
     #7  0x0000555555ab7daf in llmq::utils::IsMNRewardReallocationActive (pindex=<optimized out>) at llmq/utils.cpp:730
     #8  0x00005555559458ad in CDeterministicMNList::GetProjectedMNPayees (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffc690, pindex=0x0, nCount=<optimized out>, nCount@entry=2147483647)
            at evo/deterministicmns.cpp:231
     #9  0x000055555594614f in CDeterministicMNList::GetProjectedMNPayeesAtChainTip (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffc690, nCount=nCount@entry=2147483647) at evo/deterministicmns.cpp:216
     #10 0x00005555558c9f51 in MasternodeList::updateDIP3List (this=this@entry=0x55555908cfd0) at qt/masternodelist.cpp:194
     #11 0x00005555558ca9a0 in MasternodeList::updateDIP3ListScheduled (this=0x55555908cfd0) at qt/masternodelist.cpp:157
     #12 0x000055555684a60f in void doActivate<false>(QObject*, int, void**) ()
     #13 0x00005555568525b1 in QTimer::timerEvent(QTimerEvent*) ()
     #14 0x0000555556844ce5 in QObject::event(QEvent*) ()
     #15 0x0000555556ac3252 in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper(QObject*, QEvent*) ()
     #16 0x000055555681e6b8 in QCoreApplication::sendEvent(QObject*, QEvent*) ()
     #17 0x000055555686de2a in QTimerInfoList::activateTimers() ()
     #18 0x000055555686be84 in QEventDispatcherUNIX::processEvents(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
     #19 0x00005555569bf8a2 in QXcbUnixEventDispatcher::processEvents(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
     #20 0x000055555681caf6 in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
     #21 0x0000555556825f8a in QCoreApplication::exec() ()
...
```

## What was done?
ClientModel returns now a pair: MNList and CBlockIndex; so, we always
know the which one has been used even if current chain is switched.

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run on my localhost from `c034ff0c2606142ba3e8894bc74f693b87374e5c` -
aborted with backtrace like above.
With both of commit - no assert more.


## Breaking Changes
N/A

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-10-27 19:53:27 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
1717d2f607
feat(rpc): return activation_height in getblockchaininfo for BIP9 softforks (#5624) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
When expecting a hard fork, we manually calculate activation heights.

## What was done?
Returning expected activation height for BIP9 softporks in `locked_in`
status in `getblockchaininfo` RPC.

## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-10-23 10:56:10 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
b96f3e794b fix: missing changes from "merge bitcoin#16127: more thread safety annotation coverage" 2023-10-23 10:46:52 -05:00
UdjinM6
5d8ffe56dc
fix: add rpc help text for "ehf" field (#5628) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
#5597 follow-up 

## What was done?
add missing filed description

## How Has This Been Tested?
`help getblockchaininfo`

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-10-20 10:04:55 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
63ed462c54
feat: auto generation EHF and spork+EHF activation for MN_RR (#5597) 
Implementation EHF mechanism, part 4. Previous changes are: 
 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/4577
 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5505
 - https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469

## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently MN_RR is activated automatically by soft-fork activation after
v20 is activated.
It is not flexible enough, because platform may not be released by that
time yet or in opposite it can be too long to wait.
Also, any signal of EHF requires manual actions from MN owners to sign
EHF signal - it is automated here.

## What was done?
New spork `SPORK_24_MN_RR_READY`; new EHF manager that sign EHF signals
semi-automatically without manual actions; and send transaction with EHF
signal when signal is signed to network.
Updated rpc `getblockchaininfo` to return information about of EHF
activated forks.
Fixed function `IsTxSafeForMining` in chainlock's handler to skip
transactions without inputs (empty `vin`).

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests. Some tests have been updated due to new way
of MN_RR activation: `feature_asset_locks.py`, `feature_mnehf.py`,
`feature_llmq_evo.py` and unit test `block_reward_reallocation_tests`.


## Breaking Changes
New way of MN_RR activation.

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-10-17 22:31:40 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
cecf63e0b7
feat!: exclude fees when calculating platformReward (#5612) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Calculation of `platformReward` should ignore fees and rely only on
Block subsidy.

cc @QuantumExplorer 

## What was done?
From now on, the following formula is applied:
```
blockReward = blockSubsidy + feeReward
masternodeReward = masternodeShare(blockSubsidy)
platformReward = platformShare(masternodeReward)
masternodeReward += masternodeShare(feeReward)
```


## How Has This Been Tested?


## Breaking Changes
`plaftormReward` differs in networks where `mn_rr` is already active

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-10-17 22:07:37 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
a699ad187d refactor: removing usage of ::ChainActive::Tip() form masternode/payments 2023-10-17 08:25:51 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
e72eb40024
feat!: Block Reward Reallocation (Doubling Treasury) (#5588) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Implementation of accepted proposal:
https://www.dashcentral.org/p/TREASURY-REALLOCATION-60-20-20

## What was done?
Once Masternode Reward Location Reallocation activates:
- Treasury is bumped to 20% of block subsidy.
- Block reward shares are immediately set to 75% for MN and 25% miners.
(Previous reallocation periods are dropped)
MN reward share should be 75% of block reward in order to represent 60%
of the block subsidy. (according to the proposal)
- `governancebudget` is returned from `getgovernanceinfo` RPC.

## How Has This Been Tested?
`block_reward_reallocation_tests`

## Breaking Changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-10-03 09:32:53 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
8eda85a451
refactor: make all ToJson functions return a UniValue instead of return by reference; add nodiscard (#5592) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Return by reference is generally not ideal, and especially as there is
only one return path per function, all returns will be done via NRVO.
Additionally, call sites are simpler now.

## What was done?
Refactored to return by value


## How Has This Been Tested?
Building

## Breaking Changes
Should be none

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-09-29 12:56:52 -05:00
UdjinM6
c034ff0c26
fix: debug rpc should return a list of active debug categories, not all of them (#5585) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This restores previous behaviour which was changed/broken here
e554d3a02e (diff-0ba691cbdd97c095286e9373ed8d5be87d559234440487956326965e16cbb421R75)

## What was done?
Fix `debug` rpc results

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run rpc, check results

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-09-28 07:47:45 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
93ddd3f7e8 refactor: consolidate P2PK{H} types to P2PK_OR_P2PKH 2023-09-25 22:57:42 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
f011c31b1a refactor: make AddressType a strong enum, remove uint8_t for address_type 
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
 2023-09-25 22:57:42 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
c65a10f349 refactor: use structure binding in for loop in rpc/misc 
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
 2023-09-25 22:57:41 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
109f57c83e refactor: use range-based loops instead of iterators 
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
 2023-09-25 22:57:41 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
5c34da0675 refactor: cleanup spentindex structs, use fixed-length integers 2023-09-25 20:21:07 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
53977827ff refactor: cleanup addressindex structs, use fixed-length integers 2023-09-25 20:20:32 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
5faf29d318 refactor: use scoped weak enum instead of bare values for address type 
strong enums (enum class) cannot be converted implicitly to another
type, requiring you to either use a static_cast or use to_underlying,
which is a part of C++23, which this codebase doesn't support.

the idea of scoping a weak enum into a namespace is courtesy of
https://stackoverflow.com/a/46294875/13845753
 2023-09-24 21:59:07 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
dba0dc9501 merge bitcoin#20464: Treat CDataStream bytes as uint8_t 2023-09-24 09:50:50 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
ee313525ad
refactor: decouple db hooks from CFlatDB-based C*Manager objects, migrate to *Store structs (#5555) 
## Motivation

As highlighted in https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/52,
decoupling of `CFlatDB`-interacting components from managers of objects
like `CGovernanceManager` and `CSporkManager` is a key task for
achieving deglobalization of Dash-specific components.

The design of `CFlatDB` as a flat database agent relies on hooking into
the object's state its meant to load and store, using its
(de)serialization routines and other miscellaneous functions (notably,
without defining an interface) to achieve those ends. This approach was
taken predominantly for components that want a single-file cache.

Because of the method it uses to hook into the object (templates and the
use of temporary objects), it explicitly prevented passing arguments
into the object constructor, an explicit requirement for storing
references to other components during construction. This, in turn,
created an explicit dependency on those same components being available
in the global context, which would block the backport of bitcoin#21866,
a requirement for future backports meant to achieve parity in
`assumeutxo` support.

The design of these objects made no separation between persistent (i.e.
cached) and ephemeral (i.e. generated/fetched during initialization or
state transitions) data and the design of `CFlatDB` attempts to "clean"
the database by breaching this separation and attempting to access this
ephemeral data.

This might be acceptable if it is contained within the manager itself,
like `CSporkManager`'s `CheckAndRemove()` but is utterly unacceptable
when it relies on other managers (that, as a reminder, are only
accessible through the global state because of restrictions caused by
existing design), like `CGovernanceManager`'s `UpdateCachesAndClean()`.

This pull request aims to separate the `CFlatDB`-interacting portions of
these managers into a struct, with `CFlatDB` interacting only with this
struct, while the manager inherits the struct and manages
load/store/update of the database through the `CFlatDB` instance
initialized within its scope, though the instance only has knowledge of
what is exposed through the limited parent struct.

## Additional information

* As regards to existing behaviour, `CFlatDB` is written entirely as a
header as it relies on templates to specialize itself for the object it
hooks into. Attempting to split the logic and function definitions into
separate files will require you to explicitly define template
specializations, which is tedious.

* `m_db` is defined as a pointer as you cannot instantiate a
forward-declared template (see [this Stack Overflow
answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/12797282) for more information),
which is done when defined as a member in the object scope.

* The conditional cache flush predicating on RPC _not_ being in the
warm-up state has been replaced with unconditional flushing of the
database on object destruction (@UdjinM6, is this acceptable?)

## TODOs

This is a list of things that aren't within the scope of this pull
request but should be addressed in subsequent pull requests

* [ ] Definition of an interface that `CFlatDB` stores are expected to
implement
* [ ] Lock annotations for all potential uses of members protected by
the `cs` mutex in each manager object and store
* [ ] Additional comments documenting what each function and member does
* [ ] Deglobalization of affected managers

---------

Co-authored-by: Kittywhiskers Van Gogh <63189531+kittywhiskers@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-09-24 09:50:21 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
633cc3260f
feat: new rpc `gettxchainlocks' to get transaction statuses by batch (#5578) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Requested by @QuantumExplorer for platform needs

## What was done?
New rpc `gettransactionsarelocked` that returns list of txes.
it does less heavy calculations and transfer less data by gRPC.


## How Has This Been Tested?
```
$ src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked  '["e469de7994b9c1da8efd262fee8843efd7bdcab80c700dc1059c98b28f7c5c1b", "0d9fdf00c9568ff9103742b64e6b8287794633072f8824fa2c475f59e71dbace","0d3f48eebead54d640a7fc5692ddfcba619d8b49347d9a7c04586057c02dec9f"]'

[
  {
    "height": 907801,
    "chainlock": true
  },
  {
    "height": 101,
    "chainlock": true
  },
  {
    "height": -1,
    "chainlock": false
  }
]
```
Limiter tested by this call:
```
src/dash-cli gettransactionsarelocked  '["", "","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""]'  | wc
```

## Breaking Changes
N/A

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-09-20 09:07:24 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
400d171d04
feat(rpc): add fundingthreshold to output of getgovernanceinfo (#5581) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
DashCentral and DMT are both providing incorrect funding thresholds;
output this from core to communicate this more clearly

## What was done?
Added RPC output

## How Has This Been Tested?
Running on main net

## Breaking Changes
none

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-09-19 21:30:13 +03:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
41a6613fba
refactor: subsume CoinJoin objects under CJContext, deglobalize coinJoin{ClientQueueManager,Server} (#5337) 
## Motivation

CoinJoin's subsystems are initialized by variables and managers that
occupy the global context. The _extent_ to which these subsystems
entrench themselves into the codebase is difficult to assess and moving
them out of the global context forces us to enumerate the subsystems in
the codebase that rely on CoinJoin logic and enumerate the order in
which components are initialized and destroyed.

Keeping this in mind, the scope of this pull request aims to:

* Reduce the amount of CoinJoin-specific entities present in the global
scope
* Make the remaining usage of these entities in the global scope
explicit and easily searchable

## Additional Information

* The initialization of `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` is dependent on
blocks-only mode being disabled (which can be alternatively interpreted
as enabling the relay of transactions). The same applies to
`CBlockPolicyEstimator`, which `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` depends.

Therefore, `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` is only initialized if
transaction relaying is enabled and so is its scheduled maintenance
task. This can be found by looking at `init.cpp`
[here](93f8df1c31/src/init.cpp (L1681-L1683)),
[here](93f8df1c31/src/init.cpp (L2253-L2255))
and
[here](93f8df1c31/src/init.cpp (L2326-L2327)).
  
For this reason, `CBlockPolicyEstimator` is not a member of `CJContext`
and its usage is fulfilled by passing it as a reference when
initializing the scheduling task.

* `CJClientManager` has not used `CConnman` or `CTxMemPool` as `const`
as existing code that is outside the scope of this PR would cast away
constness, which would be unacceptable. Furthermore, some logical paths
are taken that will grind to a halt if they are stored as `const`.

  Examples of such a call chains would be:

* `CJClientManager::DoMaintenance >
CCoinJoinClientManager::DoMaintenance > DoAutomaticDenominating >
CCoinJoinClientSession::DoAutomaticDenominating >
CCoinJoinClientSession::StartNewQueue > CConnman::AddPendingMasternode`
which modifies `CConnman::vPendingMasternodes`, which is non-const
behaviour

* `CJClientManager::DoMaintenance >
CCoinJoinClientManager::DoMaintenance > DoAutomaticDenominating >
CCoinJoin::IsCollateralValid > AcceptToMemoryPool` which adds a
transaction to the memory pool, which is non-const behaviour

* There were cppcheck [linter
failures](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5337#issuecomment-1685084688)
that seemed to be caused by the usage of `Assert` in
`coinjoin/client.h`. This seems to be resolved by backporting
[bitcoin#24714](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24714). (Thanks
@knst!)
    * Depends on #5546

---------

Co-authored-by: Kittywhiskers Van Gogh <63189531+kittywhiskers@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-09-13 12:52:38 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
38e70430b9
refactor: governance constification and deglobalization (#5572) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some relatively simple refactoring; inspired by reviewing #5569; adds
some constification and some deglobalization

## What was done?
Partial deglobalization and constification

## How Has This Been Tested?
Building

## Breaking Changes
None

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-09-10 14:05:49 -05:00
UdjinM6
45a1dfd3cc
fix: add/tweak thread safety annotations around governance objects map, add missing lock (#5569) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Tidy up things a bit, address concerns expressed in
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5565#discussion_r1315258917

## What was done?
Implemented changes to make sure `mapObjects` is protected

## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, run local node

## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
 2023-09-07 10:36:41 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
f8befc811c
fix: add missing includes and remove obsolete includes (#5562) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some headers or modules are used objects from STL without including it
directly, it cause compilation failures on some platforms for some
specific compilers such as #5554

## What was done?
Added missing includes and removed obsolete includes for `optional`,
`deque`, `tuple`, `unordered_set`, `unordered_map`, `set` and `atomic`.

Please, note, that this PR doesn't cover all cases, only cases when it
is obviously missing or obviously obsolete.

Also most of changes belongs to to dash specific code; but for cases of
original bitcoin code I keep it untouched, such as missing <map> in
`src/psbt.h`

I used this script to get a list of files/headers which looks suspicious
`./headers-scanner.sh std::optional optional`:
```bash
#!/bin/bash

set -e

function check_includes() {
    obj=$1
    header=$2
    file=$3

    used=0
    included=0

    grep "$obj" "$file" >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && used=1
    grep "include <$header>" $file >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && included=1
    if [ $used == 1 ] && [ $included == 0 ]
        then echo "missing <$header> in $file"
    fi
    if [ $used == 0 ] && [ $included == 1 ]
        then echo "obsolete <$header> in $file"
    fi
}
export -f check_includes

obj=$1
header=$2

find src \( -name '*.h' -or -name '*.cpp' -or -name '*.hpp' \) -exec bash -c 'check_includes "$0" "$1" "$2"'  "$obj" "$header"  {} \;
```

## How Has This Been Tested?
Built code locally

## Breaking Changes
n/a


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
 2023-09-07 09:07:02 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
a77dc95b78 refactor: fix bad naming of namespace CMasternodePayments -> MasternodePayments 2023-09-05 11:25:28 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
9964cbe772 merge bitcoin#23411: Avoid integer overflow in ApplyStats when activating snapshot 2023-09-04 20:50:27 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
ba68ea50f9
feat: various Asset Locks improvement (#5527) 
## What was done?
 - remove dependency of Asset Lock txes on CCreditPool
- new case for functional tests of Asset Locks - more than one output
for Asset Lock tx.


## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests

## Breaking Changes
Slightly changes behaviour of TxMempool. Tx can be accepted in mempool
even if Asset Unlock transaction with same index is already mined. But
final consensus rules are same.


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
 2023-08-31 12:28:17 -05:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
811f6177ba
feat(rpc): Disable submission of triggers and gobject vote-conf RPC (#5552) 
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
With #5525 , MNs shouldn't use Sentinel anymore. 

## What was done?
In order to force them to remove Sentinel:
-  `gobject submit` RPC won't accept triggers anymore.
-  `gobject vote-conf` RPC isn't available anymore.


## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_governance.py` and `feature_governance_object.py`

## Breaking Changes
Normally, only Sentinel should be broken.

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
 2023-08-31 12:09:05 -05:00