1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Simply avoiding the hardcoded string in more places for consistency.
It can also allow for more easily reusing tests for other chains other than regtest.
Separated from #8994 .
Continues #16509 .
It is still not complete (ie to be complete, we need the -chain parameter in #16680 and make whether acceptnonstdtxs is allowed for that chain or not customizable for regtest [or for custom chains like in #8994 ] ). But while being incomplete like #16509 , it's quite simple to review and another step forward IMO.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 1abcecc. I think it's an improvement even if incomplete and if some PR's might accidentally bring "regtest" back. Subsequent improvements hopefully don't have to touch 16 files.
elichai:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125
Tree-SHA512: 5620de6dab235ca8bd8670d6366c7b9f04f0e3ca9c5e7f87765b38e16ed80c17d7d1630c0d5fd7c5526f070830d94dc74cc2096d8ede87dc7180ed20569509ee
7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b
promag:
ACK 7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
bdd6a4fd5da44c2575be9195ecb4213a13e74511 qa: Check scantxoutset result against gettxoutsetinfo (João Barbosa)
fc0c410d6e19dd8e3abbc9b0fc13c836e6678750 rpc: Improve scantxoutset response and help message (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The new response keys `height` and `bestblock` allow the client to know at what point the scan took place.
The help message now has all the response keys (`result` and `txouts` were missing) and it's improved a bit. Note that `searched_items` key is renamed to `txouts`, considering `scantxoutset` is marked experimental.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK bdd6a4fd5da44c2575be9195ecb4213a13e74511
Tree-SHA512: 6bb7c3464b19857b756b8bc491ab7c58b0d948aad8c005b26ed27c55a1278f5639217e11a315bb505b4f44ebe86f413068c1e539c8a5f7a4007735586cc6443c
510c6532ba Extract ParseDescriptorRange (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and
to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
ACKs for commit 510c65:
meshcollider:
Oh apologies, yes. Thanks :) utACK 510c6532ba
MarcoFalke:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
sipa:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
Tree-SHA512: b1f0792bfaa163890a20654a0fc2c4c4a996659916bf5f4a495662436b39326692a1a0c825caafd859e48c05f5dd1865c4f7c28092be5074edda3c94f94f9f8b
ca253f6ebf Make deriveaddresses use stop/[start,stop] notation for ranges (Pieter Wuille)
1675b7ce55 Use stop/[start,stop] notation in importmulti desc range (Pieter Wuille)
4566011631 Add support for stop/[start,stop] ranges to scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
6b9f45e81b Support ranges arguments in RPC help (Pieter Wuille)
7aa6a8aefb Add ParseRange function to parse args of the form int/[int,int] (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This introduces a consistent notation for RPC arguments in `scantxoutset`, `importmulti`, and `deriveaddresses`, either:
* `"range" : int` to just specify the end of the range
* `"range" : [int,int]` to specify both the begin and the end of the range.
For `scantxoutset`, this is a backward compatible new feature. For the two other RPCs, it's an incompatible change, but neither of them has been in a release so far. Because of that non-released reason, this only makes sense in 0.18, in my opinion.
I suggest this as an alternative to #15496, which only makes `deriveaddresses` compatible with `importmulti`, but not with the existing `scantxoutset` RPC. I also think `[int,int]` is more convenient than `{"start":int,"stop":int}`.
I realize this is technically a feature added to `scantxoutset` after the feature freeze. If desired, I'll drop the `scantxoutset` changes.
Tree-SHA512: 1cbebb90cf34f106786dbcec7afbf3f43fb8b7e46cc7e6763faf1bc1babf12375a1b3c3cf86ee83c21ed2171d99b5a2f60331850bc613db25538c38b6a056676
fac95398366f644911b58f1605e6bc37fb76782d qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled (MarcoFalke)
faa669cbcd1fc799517b523b0f850e01b11bf40a qa: Premine to deterministic address with -disablewallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the test_runner would exit if the wallet was not compiled into the Bitcoin Core executable. However, a lot of the tests run without the wallet just fine and there is no need to globally require the wallet to run the tests.
Tree-SHA512: 63177260aa29126fd20f0be217a82b10b62288ab846f96f1cbcc3bd2c52702437703475d91eae3f8d821a3149fc62b725a4c5b2a7b3657b67ffcbc81532a03bb
