fa8abdc9953e381715493b259908e246914793b0 rpc: Use FeeModes doc helper in estimatesmartfee (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Not sure why this doesn't use the doc helper, probably an oversight?
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa8abdc9953e381715493b259908e246914793b0
Tree-SHA512: 1f2dc8356e3476ddcf9cafafa7f9865ad95bed1e3067c0edab8e3c483e374bdbdbecc066167554b4a1b479e28f6a52c4ae6a75a70c67ee4e1ff4f3ba36b04001
f0dfac7da3886f8c1a1eedd70f4fd2bd298b9cd9 test: add executable flag for rpc_estimatefee.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Again a functional test without executable flag set sneaked in (see e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17806 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16742 for previous similar PRs, setting the filemode from 644 to 755). Maybe a linter like suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17830 would be worth considering to avoid future (trivial) PRs like this?
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK f0dfac7da3886f8c1a1eedd70f4fd2bd298b9cd9.
kristapsk:
ACK f0dfac7da3886f8c1a1eedd70f4fd2bd298b9cd9
Tree-SHA512: b37c11bdef439aa9d5736c9e0e0bbcc19aff876744f0c4e099ca5c67c9ff1293f1f9140f0d167ea13fee5396ae017aa4a0f1bae4f7aec8fa80b46beb421561c1
111880aaf7e12a12f0797f1b19673e3d96328edd [test] Add coverage to estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This adds light functional coverage to estimaterawfee - a subset of
the testing applied to estimatesmartfee, and argument validation
testing to both estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee.
One valid estimatesmartfee signature test is commented out because it
fails currently.
Extracted from #12940
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 361a883457b28b2dc75081666e49d6dc6b5d76eed40d858abe2dd4f35ece152cf1f99c94480a91f42a896aa2a73cf55f57921316fe66970b2d7ba691a3b17e2d
