Commit Graph

24906 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
PastaPastaPasta
1ec18b9ba8
Merge pull request #5850 from knst/bp-v21-p21
backport: bitcoin#15382, #19321, #19412, #19424, #19450, #19746, #19881, #20072, #20106, #20245, #21182
2024-02-01 09:22:34 -06:00
MarcoFalke
1762d7e5f0
partial Merge #20245: test: Run script_assets_test even if built --with-libs=no
BACKPORT NOTICE:
define/endif moved in original backport but some changes are not backported yet
---------
fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loop (MarcoFalke)
fafc5290538fde76c3780976f4b2c11dc9f24d19 test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=no (MarcoFalke)
faf58ab139949ca35b33217d010b350c9a59c61d ci: Add --with-libs=no to one ci config (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  `script_assets_test` doesn't call libbitcoinconsensus, so it seems confusing to require it

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 - looks ok to me.

Tree-SHA512: 8744fef64c5d7dc19a0ef4ae9b3df5b3f356253bf000f12723064794c5e50df071824d436059985f1112d94c1b530b65cbeb6b8435114a91b195480620eafc59
2024-02-01 09:22:05 -06:00
MarcoFalke
351d89d139
Merge #20106: cirrus: Use kvm to avoid spurious CI failures in the default virtualization cluster
faf2999e2515c47108dc3d376dbd1c0fce4d6103 cirrus: Use kvm to avoid spurious CI failures in the default virtualization cluster (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Try to fix #20093

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK faf2999e2515c47108dc3d376dbd1c0fce4d6103
  hebasto:
    ACK faf2999e2515c47108dc3d376dbd1c0fce4d6103, the related doc:

Tree-SHA512: 156aa2ce5a5dde11570f7f90f9d51be540a5469f090033ab6f337b2c46347741469e109f9566f4b7c424339483d61192b91102021f5db38823ce4cf4428e5671
2024-02-01 09:22:05 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
3e97ad43b1
refactor: unify with bitcoin s/RUN_INTEGRATION_TESTS/RUN_FUNCTIONAL_TESTS/ 2024-02-01 09:22:05 -06:00
MarcoFalke
790c3171e7
Merge #20072: ci: Build Arm64 on Travis without functional tests
33df8d46bb4b6daca91db208d3d1629d3c1e500c ci: Build Arm64 on Travis without functional tests (Fabian Jahr)

Pull request description:

  The Travis Arm64 env is a pretty big PITA for quite a while now. It simply seems to time out due to a lack of resources as far as I can tell from my research into the matter.

  I have reported the issue in August and received no response: https://travis-ci.community/t/arm64-failing-without-message/9775. Others have complained about similar issues with Arm64 over the past year. The explanation for this is probably that this env is still considered to be in beta: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures.

  Considering the high frequency of failures (I didn't run any numbers, just based on my personal observations) and the beta status I would suggest that we shorten the runtime by removing part of the test suite until the env is more stable. I would suggest removing functional tests since it should help for sure but maybe there are other ideas.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 33df8d46bb4b6daca91db208d3d1629d3c1e500c

Tree-SHA512: 55b0c658b526611d16a26e9508611ddeecbfbd842ec064ada61d188a8be2f473e080c2a35746a9aae8006b11b0c2ab9dd4639b0f3004ecf821506e26c7345972
2024-02-01 09:22:05 -06:00
MarcoFalke
9e719e8a5c
Merge #19881: ci: Double tsan CPU and Memory to avoid global timeout
fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8 ci: Double tsan CPU and Memory to avoid global timeout (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fix #19864

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8 -- patch looks correct
  hebasto:
    ACK fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8, according to https://cirrus-ci.org/guide/linux/ the limits are:

Tree-SHA512: b6d522290bfe80ed7453387b811628bf42c7657aa6a84d2f5984c8bb16f9857a71eabc6b8a4d63b84227d59b41a8ed7dd85d86cae5628dc9cf6b85bd365248d7
2024-02-01 09:22:04 -06:00
MarcoFalke
d799f51642
Merge #19746: ci: Move valgrind fuzzer to cirrus
fa0538e94db26dd84e02aac1cf174b79729dae72 ci: Set cirrus RAM to 8GB (MarcoFalke)
fa41810d0e87f9f9a2e39be238b9598be02646d0 ci: Run valgrind fuzzer on cirrus (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  The first commit should fix the 50min timeout in forked repos. Similar to #19424. E.g. https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin-core/gui/builds/718322267

  The second commit should fix #19744

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: c765098dfa913ca49b1d1eee99aaa83e4b9eb191b7ad5e652e3f04744fe8670dd3ef4215832b8e2b5bac0273d24f607fc275e72f566326108ba42ab57228ffd4
2024-02-01 09:22:04 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
0e90ea8fff
Merge #21182: build: remove mostly pointless BOOST_PROCESS macro
7bf04e358a6550ac9851f1b2d87795927fc5ff4b build: remove mostly pointless BOOST_PROCESS macro (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  Performing a series of link checks for a Boost component that is
  header-only doesn't make much sense, and currently means we just have
  another confusing Boost macro in our tree. I'm not sure why this was
  originally done this way; maybe Sjors or luke-jr can elaborate (#15382 (929cda5470f98d1ef85c05b1cad4e2fb9227e3b0))?

  The macro also has the side-effect of producing confusing error
  messages. i.e in #20744, the CI is currently failing with:
  ```bash
  checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800) lib path in "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib"... yes
  checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800)... yes
  checking whether the Boost::Process library is available... yes
  configure: error: Could not find a version of the Boost::Process library!
  ```

  This isn't useful, given there is no such thing as a `Boost::Process` library.

  This PR just removes the macro entirely, but maintains a `--with-boost-process`
  (defaulting to off), flag to configure. Hopefully this will also be
  removed, in favour of `--enable/disable-external-signer` if/when #16546
  is merged.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK 7bf04e358a6550ac9851f1b2d87795927fc5ff4b

Tree-SHA512: b270a0250f32df2078f986c165b8977967d8c06df80bf2773f3442f74b395a3bfa6544af1024d9b6524d90d47a0f6304194b3aced0e2ecb88e75916da945ccb6
2024-02-01 09:22:04 -06:00
Samuel Dobson
209c48a90a
Merge #15382: util: add RunCommandParseJSON
31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0 [util] add RunCommandParseJSON (Sjors Provoost)
c17f54ee535faaedf9033717403e1f775b5f1530 [ci] use boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
32128ba682033560d6eb2e4848a9f77a842016d2 [doc] include Doxygen comments for HAVE_BOOST_PROCESS (Sjors Provoost)
3c84d85f7d218fa27e9343c5cd1a55e519218980 [build] msvc: add boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
c47e4bbf0b44f2de1278f9538124ec98ee0815bb [build] make boost-process opt-in (Sjors Provoost)
929cda5470f98d1ef85c05b1cad4e2fb9227e3b0 configure: add ax_boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
8314c23d7b39fc36dde8b40b03b6efbe96f85698 [depends] boost: patch unused variable in boost_process (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  Prerequisite for external signer support in #16546. Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).

  This adds a new dependency [boost process](https://github.com/boostorg/process/tree/boost-1.64.0). This is part of Boost since 1.64 which is part of `depends`. Because the minimum Boost version is 1.47, this functionality is skipped for older versions of Boost.

  Use `./configure --with-boost-process` to opt in, which checks for the presence of Boost::Process.

  We add `UniValue runCommandParseJSON(const std::string& strCommand)` to `system.{h,cpp}` which calls an arbitrary command and processes the JSON returned by it. This is currently only called by the test suite.

  ~For testing purposes this adds a new regtest-only RPC method `runcommand`, as well as `test/mocks/command.py` used by functional tests.~ (this is no longer the case)

  TODO:
  - [ ] review boost process in #15440

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0
  hebasto:
    re-ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, only rebased (verified with `git range-diff`) and removed an unintentional tab character since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15382#pullrequestreview-458371035) review.
  meshcollider:
    Very light utACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, although I am not very confident with build stuff.
  promag:
    Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, don't mind the nit.
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0. I left some comments below that could be ignored or followed up later. The current change is clean and comprehensive.

Tree-SHA512: c506e747014b263606e1f538ed4624a8ad7bcf4e025cb700c12cc5739964e254dc04a2bbb848996b170e2ccec3fbfa4fe9e2b3976b191222cfb82fc3e6ab182d
2024-02-01 09:22:03 -06:00
MarcoFalke
62fb07deb6
Merge #19450: ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch
a76dafa51dd16e3f1ed665f6f7b6b2b6a708b9b4 ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  A temporary workaround for #19448.

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 47b83ff373e710bc9ba8c3661f9850a14417436028c42eb7765d21337ef25faaac4cf8cf93be844ae592d40264934d7d2f6b7ba0ab6c7209fc0da8fc13067769
2024-02-01 09:22:03 -06:00
MarcoFalke
8d5272dea1
Merge #19424: ci: Run tsan ci config on cirrus
fa8e6df282af0d396d75b03721f1b59a520ced19 ci: Run tsan ci config on cirrus (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Fixes bitcoin-core/gui#12

  Copied description from #19321:

  Currently it is not possible to use travis in forked repositories due to the 50 minute limit on builds. A fresh build (uncached) of the thread sanitizer config takes more than 50 minutes.

  One approach to fix this could be to throw away tests until the run time is less than 50 minutes. However, the risk of being blind of failures in the thrown away tests is not worth the gain. Also, to detect them, one has to run the tsan configuration nightly and failures could only be detected post-merge.

  Another approach would be to ask travis support to raise the limit for a forked repository. This is a tedious and manual one-by-one process, so I'd rather not.

  Finally, a different ci provider can be used, since the config files are designed to be platform-agnostic. This is what I picked.

  I kept all settings identical to the travis machine for now. Both providers run in the google cloud, so this should be a "move-only".

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK fa8e6df282af0d396d75b03721f1b59a520ced19 - my understanding is that test coverage remains the same. Just swapping providers to work-around the Travis time-limit in other repos.

Tree-SHA512: 26fed248a4f743107160d3b9e5df57fa0be280fd065ae6fece83d254f59d58ccf3e11a245519d158da109c47b053f62ee8756215008541973c65dc28c4efb748
2024-02-01 09:22:03 -06:00
MarcoFalke
36e380e0f0
Merge #19412: test: move TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA into native tsan setup
a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb test: move TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA into native tsan setup (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  `feature_block.py` is being run in the tsan job, i.e [here](https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/703122309), even though it should be excluded. My hasty assumption is that this will fix it. In any case, all other instances of `TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA` seem to have moved out of `.travis.yml` and into the different CI configurations.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb
  practicalswift:
    ACK a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb -- patch looks correct
  hebasto:
    ACK a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: 86057bef2cc87c6acdbbf94f8cd7a5147510448c3e67aacde8daf247e3ccf649cfc5afbbd10693e084f426042d98150616c0e49bfa5f32b949dff9cebd2fd95d
2024-02-01 09:22:03 -06:00
MarcoFalke
ff108c87ce
Merge #19321: ci: Run asan ci config on cirrus
fa2eb3d5d6819e42bfcec8a9f02b99438fe718b9 ci: Run asan ci config on cirrus (MarcoFalke)
fa93527738a62ebc13305adcb0fd2b5128073bbc cirrus: Clear dummy task (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Currently it is not possible to use travis in forked repositories due to the 50 minute limit on builds. A fresh build (uncached) of the address sanitizer config takes more than 50 minutes.

  One approach to fix this could be to throw away tests until the run time is less than 50 minutes. However, the risk of being blind of failures in the thrown away tests is not worth the gain. Also, to detect them, one has to run the asan configuration nightly and failures could only be detected post-merge.

  Another approach would be to ask travis support to raise the limit for a forked repository. This is a tedious and manual one-by-one process, so I'd rather not.

  Finally, a different ci provider can be used, since the config files are designed to be platform-agnostic. This is what I picked.

  I kept all settings identical to the travis machine for now. Both providers run in the google cloud, so this should be a "move-only".

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK fa2eb3d5d6819e42bfcec8a9f02b99438fe718b9

Tree-SHA512: 159d7dc6f5b24583e941282cdd40465b15db787f0a658a3e81a7b1a22abdb4cb573709b9b5c4465523e0ba0060b17a68fbdbda7a9ecdeb649f31535d377bbe75
2024-02-01 09:22:00 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
f5b7aa0802
feat(rpc): quorum dkginfo rpc (#5853)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Dashmate wanted a way to know if it is safe to restart the masternode.
This new RPC indicates the number of active DKG sessions, and the number
of blocks until next potential DKG.

## What was done?
Examples of responses:
`{'active_dkgs': 0, 'next_dkg': 22}`

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_rotation.py` was updated

## Breaking Changes
no

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-02-01 09:17:40 -06:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
82310b0984
feat(rpc): added optional block height in getassetunlockstatuses (#5849)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC `getassetunlockstatuses` is now accepting an extra optional
parameter `height`.
When a valid `height` is passed, then the RPC returns the status of
AssetUnlock indexes up to this specific block. (Requested by Platform
team)

## What was done?
Note that in order to avoid cases that can lead to deterministic result,
when `height` is passed, then the only `chainlocked` and `unknown`
outcomes are possible.

## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_asset_locks.py` was updated.

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-02-01 09:15:20 -06:00
Alessandro Rezzi
2238e03bae
fix: don't make keypool refill spam progress bars (#5851)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
 
Trivial bug: `keypoolrefill` internally updates the status of the
progress bar each second.
```
m_storage.UpdateProgress(strMsg, static_cast<int>(dProgress));
```
However it can happen that one second is not enough time to make
significant progress and
 `static_cast<int>(dProgress) = 0`. 
Calling the function with `0` as progress opens a new progress bar and
this led to problems like #5730



## What was done?

  trivially make sure to update the progress only if the parameter is >0


## How Has This Been Tested?

  rpc does not spam anymore


## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [X] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2024-01-31 11:41:57 -06:00
PastaPastaPasta
1a76031e9c
Merge pull request #5846 from knst/bp-v21-p19
backport: bitcoin#19597, #20105, partial #18027, #20004, bitcon-core/gui#35, 71, #85,  #120, #220
2024-01-31 11:32:44 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
e269fa44c5
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#35: Parse params directly instead of through node (partial revert #10244)
519cae8fd6e44aef3470415d7c5e12acb0acd9f4 gui: Delay interfaces::Node initialization (Russell Yanofsky)
102abff9eb6c267af64f2a3560712147d1896e13 gui: Replace interface::Node references with pointers (Russell Yanofsky)
91aced7c7e6e75c1f5896b7e3843015177f32748 gui: Remove unused interfaces::Node references (Russell Yanofsky)
e1336316250ab5cb0ed654b1e593378a6e0769ce gui: Partially revert #10244 gArgs and Params changes (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).

  ---

  This is a partial revert of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10244. It changes gui code to go back to using gArgs and Params() functions directly instead of using interfaces::Node to handle arguments.

  These changes were originally pushed as part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19461. Motivation is to support a new GUI process connecting to an already running node process. Details are explained in commit messages, but in addition to spawning a new bitcoin-node process, we want bitcoin-gui to connect to an existing bitcoin-node process. So for that reason it should be able to parse its own parameters, rather than rely on the node.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK 519cae8fd6, only change is rebase and addressed nits of my previous review last week 🌄

Tree-SHA512: 9c339dd82ba78bcc7b887b84d872f35ccc7dfa3d271691e6eafe8a2048cbbe3bdde1e810ce33d0714d75d048c9de3470e9e9b6f8306a6047d1cb3548f6858dc8
2024-01-31 11:32:24 -06:00
Jonas Schnelli
872b2c37b1
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#120: Fix multiwallet transaction notifications
241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247 refactor: qt: Use vQueueNotifications.clear() (João Barbosa)
989e579d07bb5031639060b717f7a0be15d10e29 qt: Make transaction notification queue wallet specific (João Barbosa)
7b3b2303f44031c3545651858f697a495c3ea37a move-only: Define TransactionNotification before  TransactionTablePriv (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  Currently `vQueueNotifications` holds transactions of any wallet, but the queue is dispatched on a given wallet and it assumes notifications are of that wallet.

  This means that some transactions can be missed if multiple wallets are loaded.

  Fix this by having a queue for each wallet.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonasschnelli:
    utACK 241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247
  hebasto:
    ACK 241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247. Only change is dropping one commit

Tree-SHA512: 61beac5a16ed659e3a25ad145dbceafcef963aaf8f9838355298949ec2324e2bd760f59353cd251d30cf0334d8dc1642a1f3821d8a9eec092533b581f6ce86db
2024-01-31 11:32:24 -06:00
Konstantin Akimov
c4362487f2
refactor: unify code of qr widget with bitcoin's implementation bitcoin-core/gui#71 2024-01-31 11:32:24 -06:00
Jonas Schnelli
89e6815a4f
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#71: Fix visual quality of text in QR image
6954156b4091bc1e561502f0eef0cece56c76eec qt: Fix visual quality of text in QR image (Hennadii Stepanov)
8071c75d45e12c2bca04b170c687bebd30ad19ac qt, refactor: Limit scope of QPainter object (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Master (197450f80868fe752c6107955e5da80704212b34):
  ![DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20200824001800](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/90988962-96283680-e59f-11ea-8e20-42e9b23033f5.png)

  This PR (6954156b4091bc1e561502f0eef0cece56c76eec):
  - macOS 10.15.6
  ![Screenshot from 2020-09-07 15-40-30](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/92390251-2c716600-f123-11ea-96f0-0e9d35810c76.png)

  - Linux Mint 20
  ![Screenshot from 2020-09-07 15-48-13](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/92390272-36936480-f123-11ea-8fee-4de23bb40ed9.png)

  Fix #54
  Fix https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19103

  ---

  The first commit is easy to review with [`git diff --word-diff`](8071c75d45).

ACKs for top commit:
  jonasschnelli:
    Tested ACK 6954156b4091bc1e561502f0eef0cece56c76eec - tested on macOS 10.15. Fixes the problem.

Tree-SHA512: 6ecb3397d2a5094c5f00ee05fc09520751568404e000a8691b6de7e57f38c2d5da628694e5e45a2b4cc302a846bbc00014c40820233eb026d3ebd4f68c2c9913
2024-01-31 11:32:23 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
7c3c6c6cea
Merge #20105: [net] Remove CombinerAll
1afcd41a906e6417925e80578c0d850d269dc008 [net] Remove CombinerAll (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  This was introduced in 9519a9a4 for use with boost signals. Boost signals
  have not been used in net since 8ad663c1, so this code is unused.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK 1afcd41a906e6417925e80578c0d850d269dc008
  laanwj:
    code review ACK 1afcd41a906e6417925e80578c0d850d269dc008

Tree-SHA512: a4313142afb88bf12f15abc4e717b3b0d0b40d2d5db2638494af3181e1cd680d7b036087050fc0e0dfe606228849a2e20ae85135908a9ebe8ff2130f163920e1
2024-01-31 11:32:23 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
bd63c19392
partial Merge #20004: test: Add signet witness commitment section parse tests
fa29b5ae666bbb4c19188f0dcf8a1ba738aac624 test: Add signet witness commitment section parse tests (MarcoFalke)
fa23308e9aad70c99a31f91d8556f1876ea02c04 Remove gArgs global from CreateChainParams to aid testing (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK fa29b5ae666bbb4c19188f0dcf8a1ba738aac624

Tree-SHA512: f956407d690decbfb8178bcb8f101d107389fecc3aa7be515f7b0f5ceac26d798c165100f7ddf08cec569beabcc6514862dda23b667cc4fd0a784316784735c2
2024-01-31 11:32:23 -06:00
MarcoFalke
7048cb74ba
Merge #19597: test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO)
82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #19523, adding a simple test to `rpc_psbt.py` that checks that the decodepsbt fee matches the one given by the wallet (`walletcreatefundedpsbt`). This is in particular important for PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type set.

  Example test run after reverting commit 75122780e2c46505d977e24c5612dfa9442ab754 ("Increment input value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt"):

  ```
  $ test/functional/rpc_psbt.py
  2020-07-26T11:31:44.862000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__sutcd4y
  20.00007580
  2020-07-26T11:31:47.073000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 118, in main
      self.run_test()
    File "test/functional/rpc_psbt.py", line 166, in run_test
      assert_equal(decoded['fee'], created_psbt['fee'])
    File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 49, in assert_equal
      raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args))
  AssertionError: not(20.00007580 == 0.00007580)
  2020-07-26T11:31:47.125000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
  ......
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84

Tree-SHA512: 296b8a701f851d482ef6200c6cbf0cf0257a79a828ac6dbc39b05d8c2d839c6fdb9d3f5a084015295cfa3eac7c11faa2f2d52e619c11627b04c75150eead8330
2024-01-31 11:32:22 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
bebd915859
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#220: Do not translate file extensions
88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c qt: Do not translate file extensions (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  File extensions are untranslatable by their nature.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Concept and code review ACK 88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c
  Talkless:
    tACK 88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2. Tested all filters except for .psbt.
  jarolrod:
    re-ACK 88df300f20da02060694cfe643e1c882efaa306c

Tree-SHA512: 104d383543edcee8fb825f98d3b6669a7aaae2c74b6602f9bc407bf1c88be121ec535f2f9be87afa6ca775dc79865165f620553f6f6ab1d31a3f9ea93f7f9593
2024-01-31 11:32:22 -06:00
Jonas Schnelli
0deb1520af
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#85: Remove unused "What's This" button in dialogs on Windows OS
ac7ccd67d7f2b09e36dd57405f899e4698dd3d78 scripted-diff: Remove unused "What's This" button in dialogs on Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
b6951483ecdd4409a0e1d492c93bcd4d823f039d qt: Add flags to prevent a "What's This" button on Windows OS (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Fix #74.

  From [Qt docs](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdialog.html#QDialog):
  > The widget flags _f_ are passed on to the `QWidget` constructor. If, for example, you don't want a **What's This** button in the title bar of the dialog, pass `Qt::WindowTitleHint | Qt::WindowSystemMenuHint` in _f_.

  Screenshot on Windows 10 (2004):
  - master (3ba25e3bdde3464eed5d2743d68546e48b005544)
  ![Screenshot from 2020-09-07 16-55-42](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/92402384-20dc6a00-f138-11ea-9dcb-3e0f6373ff22.png)

  - this PR (e322fe7e19ac504272d14b9b4f9b28b13df888ed)
  ![Screenshot from 2020-09-07 18-31-16](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32963518/92402509-5aad7080-f138-11ea-8b63-9bbbf8b9b9e1.png)

ACKs for top commit:
  Bosch-0:
    tACK ac7ccd67d7f2b09e36dd57405f899e4698dd3d78 Tested on Windows 10.0.18363 Build 18363.
  promag:
    Code review ACK ac7ccd67d7f2b09e36dd57405f899e4698dd3d78 but with some suggestions.
  jonasschnelli:
    utACK ac7ccd67d7f2b09e36dd57405f899e4698dd3d78

Tree-SHA512: f6750a17b7203106cb4db5870becba1cef6a505d4edcc710ba131338bd3aae051510627e62c9bcb8345a7f497c614709e11aeb8f6ae3ea85967bbce2a8c69e64
2024-01-31 11:32:22 -06:00
Samuel Dobson
a11493e20a
partial Merge #18027: "PSBT Operations" dialog
BACKPORT NOTICE
fixup psbt. all missing changes belongs to src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h/cpp ----- they are related to descriptor wallet!
-------------------

931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Make lint-spelling.py happy (Glenn Willen)
11a0ffb29d1b4dcc55c8826873f340ab4196af21 [gui] Load PSBT from clipboard (Glenn Willen)
a6cb0b0c29d327d01aebb98b0504f317eb19c3dc [gui] PSBT Operations Dialog (sign & broadcast) (Glenn Willen)
5dd0c03ffa3aeaa69d8a3a716f902f450d5eaaec FillPSBT: report number of inputs signed (or would sign) (Glenn Willen)
9e7b23b73387600d175aff8bd5e6624dd51f86e7 Improve TransactionErrorString messages. (Glenn Willen)

Pull request description:

  Add a "PSBT Operations" dialog, reached from the "Load PSBT..." menu item, giving options to sign or broadcast the loaded PSBT as appropriate, as well as copying the result to the clipboard or saving it to a file.

  This is based on Sjors' #17509, and depends on that PR going in first. (It effectively replaces the small "load PSBT" dialog from that PR with a more feature-rich one.)

  Some notes:
  * The way I display status information is maybe unusual (a status bar, rather than messageboxes.) I think it's helpful to have the information in it be persistent rather than transitory. But if people dislike it, I would probably move the "current state of the transaction" info to the top line of the main label, and the "what action just happened, and did it succeed" info into a messagebox.
  * I don't really know much about the translation/localization stuff. I put tr() in all the places it seemed like it ought to go. I did not attempt to translate the result of TransactionErrorString (which is shared by GUI and non-GUI code); I don't know if that's correct, but it matches the "error messages in logs should be googleable in English" heuristic. I don't know whether there are things I should be doing to reduce translator effort (like minimizing the total number of distinct message strings I use, or something.)
  * I don't really know how (if?) automated testing is applied to GUI code. I can make a list of PSBTs exercising all the codepaths for manual testing, if that's the right approach. Input appreciated.

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    tested ACK 931dd47608
  Sjors:
    re-tACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
  jb55:
    ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
  achow101:
    ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243

Tree-SHA512: ade52471a2242f839a8bd6a1fd231443cc4b43bb9c1de3fb5ace7c5eb59eca99b1f2e9f17dfdb4b08d84d91f5fd65677db1433dd03eef51c7774963ef4e2e74f
2024-01-31 11:32:22 -06:00
PastaPastaPasta
ce67e07294
Merge pull request #5847 from knst/bp-v21-p20
backport: bitcoin#19731 and related fixes for DashTestFramework
2024-01-29 10:20:37 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
92fbe75181
Merge #19731: net, rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/nLastTXTime as last block/last_transaction in getpeerinfo
5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257 doc: release note for getpeerinfo last_block/last_transaction (Jon Atack)
cfef5a2c98b9563392a4a258fedb8bdc869c9749 test: rpc_net.py logging and test naming improvements (Jon Atack)
21c57bacda766a4f56ee75a2872f5d0f94e3901e test: getpeerinfo last_block and last_transaction tests (Jon Atack)
8a560a7d57cbd9f473d6a3782893a0e2243c55bd rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/TXTime as getpeerinfo last_block/transaction (Jon Atack)
02fbe3ae0bd91cbab2828cb7aa46f6493c82f026 net: add nLastBlockTime/TXTime to CNodeStats, CNode::copyStats (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds inbound peer eviction criteria `nLastBlockTime` and `nLastTXTime` to `CNodeStats` and `CNode::copyStats`, which then allows exposing them in the next commit as `last_transaction` and `last_block` Unix Epoch Time fields in RPC `getpeerinfo`.

  This may be useful for writing missing eviction tests. I'd also like to add `lasttx` and `lastblk` columns to the `-netinfo` dashboard as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19643#issuecomment-671093420.

  Relevant discussion at the p2p irc meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-08-11.html#l-549:
  ```text
  <jonatack> i was specifically trying to observe and figure out how to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19500
  <jonatack> which made me realise that i didn't know what was going on with my peer conns in enough detail
  <jonatack> i'm running bitcoin locally with nLastBlockTime and nLastTXTime added to getpeerinfo for my peer connections dashboard
  <jonatack> sipa: is there a good reason why that (eviction criteria) data is not exposed through getpeerinfo currently?
  <sipa> jonatack: nope; i suspect just nobody ever added it
  <jonatack> sipa: thanks. will propose.
  ```

  The last commit is optional, but I think it would be good to have logging in `rpc_net.py`.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    Code review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
  theStack:
    Code Review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
  darosior:
    ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257

Tree-SHA512: 2db164bc979c014837a676e890869a128beb7cf40114853239e7280f57e768bcb43bff6c1ea76a61556212135281863b5290b50ff9d24fce16c5b89b55d4cd70
2024-01-28 22:20:47 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
1c8c4eea54
fix: correct connection order - regular nodes before MN 2024-01-28 22:20:46 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
1d45ad9019
fix: node initialization in DashTestFramework to unify with BitcoinTestFramework 2024-01-28 22:20:46 +07:00
UdjinM6
10312f7d9e
fix: revive IsQuorumTypeEnabled logic dropped in 5790 (#5841)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`develop` can't sync from genesis on mainnet,
b8a086d5e7
broke it.

#5790 follow-up

## What was done?
Revive the old logic but using hardcoded block heights instead of
scanning via quorum manager.

## How Has This Been Tested?
Synced on mainnet/testnet, CI is happy
https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/1148980046.

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2024-01-27 22:56:55 -06:00
PastaPastaPasta
f0b42caef9
Merge pull request #5843 from knst/bp-v21-p18
backport: bitcoin#17428, #17785, #19109, #19610, #19804, #19879, #20022, #20027, #20090, #20131
2024-01-27 22:55:44 -06:00
fanquake
c0f7ffd27c
Merge #19109: Only allow getdata of recently announced invs
f32c408f3a0b7e597977df2bc2cdc4ae298586e5 Make sure unconfirmed parents are requestable (Pieter Wuille)
c4626bcd211af08c85b6567ef07eeae333edba47 Drop setInventoryTxToSend based filtering (Pieter Wuille)
43f02ccbff9b137d59458da7a8afdb0bf80e127f Only respond to requests for recently announced transactions (Pieter Wuille)
b24a17f03982c9cd8fd6ec665b16e022374c96f0 Introduce constant for mempool-based relay separate from mapRelay caching (Pieter Wuille)
a9bc5638031a29abaa40284273a3507b345c31e9 Swap relay pool and mempool lookup (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  This implements the follow-up suggested here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18861#issuecomment-627630111 . Instead of checking `setInventoryTxToSend`, maintain an explicit bloom filter with the 3500 most recently announced invs, and permit fetching any of these as long as they're in the relay pool or the mempool. In addition, permit relay from the mempool after just 2 minutes instead of 15.

  This:

  * Fixes the brief opportunity an attacker has to request unannounced invs just after the connection is established (pointed out by naumenkogs, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18861#issuecomment-627627010).
  * Guarantees that locally resubmitted invs after `filterInventoryKnown` rolls over can still be requested (pointed out by luke-jr, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18861#discussion_r419695831).

  It adds 37 KiB of filter per peer.

  This is also a step towards dropping the relay pool entirely and always relaying from the mempool directly (see #17303), but that is still blocked by dealing properly with NOTFOUNDs (see #18238).

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    reACK f32c408f3
  jonatack:
    re-ACK f32c408 per `git range-diff f7c19e8 2da7ee3 f32c408` and redid the following: code review, thought about motivation, DoS and privacy aspects, debug build to check for warnings after updating Clang from 6 to 11 since last review.
  ajtowns:
    re-ACK f32c408f3a0b7e597977df2bc2cdc4ae298586e5

Tree-SHA512: aa05b9fd01bad59581c4ec91836a52d7415dc933fa49d4c4adced79aa25aaad51e11166357e8c8b29fbf6021a7401b98c21b850b5d8e8ad773fdb5d6608e1e85
2024-01-27 22:55:30 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
460abd9b87
Merge #20090: [doc] Tiny followups to new getpeerinfo connection type field
41dca087b73a3627107603694f5a982ea2a53189 [trivial] Extract connection type doc into file where it is used. (Amiti Uttarwar)
3069b56a456d98fca7c4a4ccd329581bd1f0b853 [doc] Improve help for getpeerinfo connection_type field. (Amiti Uttarwar)

Pull request description:

  two commits addressing small followups from #19725

  * first commit adds a clarification in the release notes that this field shouldn't be expected to be stable (suggested by sdaftuar in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19725#issuecomment-697421878)

  * second commit moves the `CONNECTION_TYPE_DOC` object out of the header file to reduce the size of the binary (suggested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19725#discussion_r495467895, he tested and found a decrease of 10kB)

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 41dca087b73a3627107603694f5a982ea2a53189
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 41dca087b73a3627107603694f5a982ea2a53189

Tree-SHA512: a555df978b4341fbe05deeb40a8a655f0d3c5c1c0adcc1737fd2cf61b204a5a24a301ca0c2b5a3616554d4abf8c57074d22dbda5a50d8450bc22c57679424985
2024-01-27 22:55:30 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
df61646c72
Merge #17428: p2p: Try to preserve outbound block-relay-only connections during restart
a490d074b3491427afbd677f5fa635b910f8bb34 doc: Add anchors.dat to files.md (Hennadii Stepanov)
0a85e5a7bc8dc6587963e2e37ac1b087a1fc97fe p2p: Try to connect to anchors once (Hennadii Stepanov)
5543c7ab285e90256cbbf9858249e028c9611cda p2p: Fix off-by-one error in fetching address loop (Hennadii Stepanov)
4170b46544231e7cf1d64ac3baa314083be37502 p2p: Integrate DumpAnchors() and ReadAnchors() into CConnman (Hennadii Stepanov)
bad16aff490dcf87722fbfe202a869fb24c734e1 p2p: Add CConnman::GetCurrentBlockRelayOnlyConns() (Hennadii Stepanov)
c29272a157d09a8125788c1b860e89b63b4cb36c p2p: Add ReadAnchors() (Hennadii Stepanov)
567008d2a0c95bd972f4031f31647c493d1bc2e8 p2p: Add DumpAnchors() (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This is an implementation of #17326:
  - all (currently 2) outbound block-relay-only connections (#15759) are dumped to `anchors.dat` file
  - on restart a node tries to connect to the addresses from `anchors.dat`

  This PR prevents a type of eclipse attack when an attacker exploits a victim node restart to force it to connect to new, probably adversarial, peers.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    code review ACK a490d074b3
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK a490d074b3491427afbd677f5fa635b910f8bb34

Tree-SHA512: 0f5098a3882f2814be1aa21de308cd09e6654f4e7054b79f3cfeaf26bc02b814ca271497ed00018d199ee596a8cb9b126acee8b666a29e225b08eb2a49b02ddd
2024-01-27 22:55:30 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
241cd9476e
Merge #20131: test: Remove unused nVersion=1 in p2p tests
faad92fe1c3cca9795226bd167130976930ddab8 test: Remove unused nVersion=1 in p2p tests (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  After commit ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 nVersion is no
  longer used in p2p logic when sending messages. Only when receiving
  messages, but in this test no messages are received.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK faad92fe1c3cca9795226bd167130976930ddab8
  fanquake:
    ACK faad92fe1c3cca9795226bd167130976930ddab8

Tree-SHA512: 9a7029187aaa5a7929a4a2199646131ff1ea72df6a855ce7022dd3bb2647dd525356dbc5e460c77007eebcdeab400a689db8cb77e8239af3b539c117a4e0d16e
2024-01-27 22:55:29 -06:00
MarcoFalke
3f97a3e212
Merge #20027: Use mockable time everywhere in net_processing
b6834e312a6a7bb395ec7266bc9469384639df96 Avoid 'timing mishap' warnings when mocking (Pieter Wuille)
ec3916f40a3fc644ecbbaaddef6258937c7fcfbc Use mockable time everywhere in net_processing (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  The fact that net_processing uses a mix of mockable tand non-mockable time functions made it hard to write functional tests for #19988.

  I'm opening this as a separate PR as I believe it's independently useful. In some ways this doesn't go quite as far as it could, as there are now several data structures that could be converted to `std::chrono` types as well now. I haven't done that here, but I'm happy to reconsider that.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK b6834e312a 🌶
  jnewbery:
    utACK b6834e312a6a7bb395ec7266bc9469384639df96
  naumenkogs:
    utACK b6834e3

Tree-SHA512: 6528a167c57926ca12894e0c476826411baf5de2f7b01c2125b97e5f710e620f427bbb13f72bdfc3de59072e56a9c1447bce832f41c725e00e81fea019518f0e
2024-01-27 22:55:29 -06:00
MarcoFalke
2b941e594b
Merge #20022: test: use explicit p2p objects where available
0fcaf731997c4989b869e42d8990f742637799c2 test: use explicit p2p objects where available (Oliver Gugger)

Pull request description:

  This is a follow-up patch to #19804 as suggested by MarcoFalke (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19804#discussion_r494950062).

  To make the intent of the tests easier to understand, we reference the
  p2p connection objects by their explicit names instead of the p2ps array.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    ACK 0fcaf731997c4989b869e42d8990f742637799c2

Tree-SHA512: 37db22185077beeadfa7245bb768b87d6b7a2cfb906c3c859ab92ec3d657122db7301777f0838e13dfc748f37303850144fb7553e6cb6c66903e304d6e10e659
2024-01-27 22:55:29 -06:00
MarcoFalke
40420195be
Merge #19804: test/refactor: reference p2p objects explicitly and remove confusing Test_Node.p2p property
10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408)
549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408)
7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408)
784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408)

Pull request description:

  The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`.

  I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests).
  Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another.

  The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this:
  ```py
  p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
  ```
  A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly.

  If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself).

ACKs for top commit:
  robot-dreams:
    utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d
  jnewbery:
    utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d
  guggero:
    Concept ACK 10d61505.

Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
2024-01-27 22:55:29 -06:00
Hennadii Stepanov
91e6817a18
Merge #17785: p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions
ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033 p2p: Use the greatest common version in peer logic (Hennadii Stepanov)
e084d45562b94827b3a7873895882fcaae9f4d48 p2p: Remove SetCommonVersion() from VERACK handler (Hennadii Stepanov)
8d2026796a6f7add0c2cda9806e759817d1eae6f refactor: Rename local variable nSendVersion (Hennadii Stepanov)
e9a6d8b13b0558b17cdafbd32fd2663b4138ff11 p2p: Unify Send and Receive protocol versions (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  On master (6fef85bfa3cd7f76e83b8b57f9e4acd63eb664ec) `CNode` has two members to keep protocol version:
  - `nRecvVersion` for received messages
  - `nSendVersion` for messages to send

  After exchanging with `VERSION` and `VERACK` messages via protocol version `INIT_PROTO_VERSION`, both nodes set `nRecvVersion` _and_ `nSendVersion` to _the same_ value which is the greatest common protocol version.

  This PR:
  - replaces two `CNode` members, `nRecvVersion` `nSendVersion`, with `m_greatest_common_version`
  - removes duplicated getter and setter

  There is no change in behavior on the P2P network.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033
  naumenkogs:
    ACK ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033
  fjahr:
    Code review ACK ddefb5c0b759950942ac03f28c43b548af7b4033
  amitiuttarwar:
    code review but untested ACK ddefb5c0b7
  benthecarman:
    utACK `ddefb5c`

Tree-SHA512: 5305538dbaa5426b923b0afd20bdef4f248d310855d1d78427210c00716c67b7cb691515c421716b6157913e453076e293b10ff5fd2cd26a8e5375d42da7809d
2024-01-27 22:55:28 -06:00
fanquake
0c28db72c2
Merge #19879: [p2p] miscellaneous wtxid followups
a8a64acaf32ac21feeb885671772282b531ef9a2 [BroadcastTransaction] Remove unsafe move operator (Amiti Uttarwar)
125c0381266e0e05a408f8e1818501ab73d29110 [p2p] Remove dead code (Amiti Uttarwar)
fc66d0a65cdc52a3b259effe0c29b5eafb1b5ff5 [p2p] Check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer (Adam Jonas)
cb79b9dbf4cd06e17c8c65b36bf15c3ea2641de4 [mempool] Revert unbroadcast set to tracking just txid (Amiti Uttarwar)

Pull request description:

  Addresses some outstanding review comments from #18044

  - reverts unbroadcast txids to a set instead of a map (simpler, communicates intent better, takes less space, no efficiency advantages of map)
  - adds safety around two touchpoints (check for nullptr before dereferencing pointer, remove an inaccurate std::move operator)
  - removes some dead code

  Links to comments on wtxid PR: [1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460495254) [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r460496023) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r463532611)

  thanks to jnewbery & adamjonas for flagging these ! !

ACKs for top commit:
  sdaftuar:
    utACK a8a64acaf32ac21feeb885671772282b531ef9a2
  naumenkogs:
    utACK a8a64acaf32ac21feeb885671772282b531ef9a2
  jnewbery:
    utACK a8a64acaf32ac21feeb885671772282b531ef9a2

Tree-SHA512: 7be669cb30cc17fb9e06b50e636ef7887c6a27354697987e4e4d38dba4b8f50e175647587430cd9bc3295bec01ce8b1e6639a50a4249d8fff9b1ca1b9ead3277
2024-01-27 22:55:28 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
11d166d609
Merge #19610: p2p: refactor AlreadyHave(), CInv::type, INV/TX processing
fb56d37612dea6666e7da73d671311a697570dae p2p: ensure inv is GenMsgTx before ToGenTxid in inv processing (John Newbery)
aa3621385ee66c9dde5c632c0a79fba3a6ea2d62 test: use CInv::MSG_WITNESS_TX flag in p2p_segwit (Jon Atack)
24ee4f01eadb870435712950a1364cf0def06e9f p2p: make gtxid(.hash) and fAlreadyHave localvars const (Jon Atack)
b1c855453bf2634e7fd9b53c4a76a8536fc9865d p2p: use CInv block message helpers in net_processing.cpp (Jon Atack)
acd66421671e42a58e8e067868e1ab86268e3231 [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveTx() to take a GenTxid (John Newbery)
5fdfb80b861e0de3fcf8a57163b3f52af4b2df3b [net processing] Change AlreadyHaveBlock() to take block_hash argument (John Newbery)
430e183b89d00b4148f0b77a6fcacca2cd948202 [net processing] Remove mempool argument from AlreadyHaveBlock() (John Newbery)
42ca5618cae0fd9ef97d2006b17d896bc58cc17c [net processing] Split AlreadyHave() into separate block and tx functions (John Newbery)
39f1dc944554218911b0945fff7e6d06f3dab284 p2p: remove nFetchFlags from NetMsgType TX and INV processing (Jon Atack)
471714e1f024fb3b4892a7a8b34a76b83a13fa19 p2p: add CInv block message helper methods (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Building on #19590 and the recent `wtxid` and `GenTxid` changes, this is a refactoring and cleanup PR to simplify and improve some of the net processing code.

  Some of the diffs are best reviewed with `-w` to ignore spacing.

  Co-authored by John Newbery.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fb56d37612dea6666e7da73d671311a697570dae
  jnewbery:
    utACK fb56d37612dea6666e7da73d671311a697570dae
  vasild:
    ACK fb56d3761

Tree-SHA512: ba39b58e6aaf850880a842fe5f6295e9f1870906ef690206acfc17140aae2ac854981e1066dbcd4238062478762fbd040ef772fdc2c50eea6869997c583e6a6d
2024-01-27 22:55:26 -06:00
PastaPastaPasta
8e29d1dda6
Merge pull request #5836 from knst/bp-v21-p15
backport: bitcoin#18790, #19164, #19226, #19276, #19348, #19422, #19840, #20071, #20076, partial #19041
2024-01-27 22:45:18 -06:00
MarcoFalke
a53ef19d99
Merge #20071: ci, lint: Remove usage of TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE
BACKPORT NOTICE
There's some difference with original PR but that's not important because we do not actually use travis.
The variable TRAVIS_BRANCH would be removed anyway in bitcoin#20697 - let's just skip it for simplicity
--------------

a91ab86fae91d416d664d19d2f482a8d19c115a6 lint: Use TRAVIS_BRANCH in lint-git-commit-check.sh (Fabian Jahr)
c11dc995c98e908dfd9cea64d4b34329b1dbb5c6 lint: Don't use TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE in whitespace linter (Fabian Jahr)
1b41ce8f5f3debae03ca60e4acada14680df9185 lint: Don't use TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE for commit-script-check (Fabian Jahr)

Pull request description:

  This is causing problems again, very similar to #19654.

  UPDATE: This now removes all remaining usages of TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE and instead uses TRAVIS_BRANCH for the range, including `lint-git-commit-check` where TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE had already been removed. For builds triggered by a pull request, TRAVIS_BRANCH is the name of the branch targeted by the pull request. In the linters there is still a fallback that assumes master as the target branch.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK a91ab86fae91d416d664d19d2f482a8d19c115a6. See test I tried in #20075.

Tree-SHA512: 1378bdebd5d8787a83fbda5d9999cc9447209423e7f0218fe5eb240e6a32dc1b51d1cd53b4f8cd1f71574d935ac5e22e203dfe09cce17e9976a48416038e1263
2024-01-27 22:44:49 -06:00
MarcoFalke
980f9b6673
Merge #19276: ci: Move travis workarounds to .travis.yml
fa7166759789c1282609ff3ab2e80d4f70910a9f ci: Move travis workarounds to .travis.yml (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  It seems odd to have travis related workarounds in the general ci config files. Fix that oddity by moving the travis related workarounds to the travis yaml file.

  For unexplained reasons, this should also work around and thus close #19171

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK fa7166759789c1282609ff3ab2e80d4f70910a9f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: b4419d38e2b41f6e4d6e6b7658f1d972c40c390a49fe78808f8640d28efd84cc6668ce292d45b7c539e65b9e2ecbad10e796cb8f9329a0f1e7d0132ce962d226
2024-01-27 22:44:49 -06:00
MarcoFalke
ab8ab8b32f
Merge #19422: ci: Add tsan suppression for race in wallet
fa12d8d3edfbed8d5ce746e75af94eb92372f6b7 ci: Add tsan suppression for race in wallet (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Workaround to fix #19417 (Intermittent CI failure)

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 2d68783d6db1bf425ce830cb23eab2f7fa3b9ee18cfb08665e4187196af571547206646dc6dfac0b4444e3dc6c4c13ae45efb09607d2d50df20a3d0a4eec98bd
2024-01-27 22:44:48 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
6b6832b2de
Merge #19226: test: Add BerkeleyDatabase tsan suppression
fa7b46cc915d048d8e6bc7c074334e631fceb7ec test: Add BerkeleyDatabase tsan suppression (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Suppresses/Fixes #19211 for now

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK fa7b46cc915d048d8e6bc7c074334e631fceb7ec
  practicalswift:
    ACK fa7b46cc915d048d8e6bc7c074334e631fceb7ec -- patch looks correct

Tree-SHA512: 749e606caf0f140c1a190e3273ff81d220daa3eb004ba2b2078e6b3c5b6ac196bd5fc91ef42841412cfd4fe1e2a8694fc2a28268fde8485db90076593fc51dc7
2024-01-27 22:44:48 -06:00
fanquake
f98429052d
Merge #19164: ci: tsan with wallet
fa7e002d520d8390f3ff4b0383cfdfc14713355d ci: tsan with wallet (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK fa7e002d520d8390f3ff4b0383cfdfc14713355d -- patch looks correct and Travis is happy
  hebasto:
    ACK fa7e002d520d8390f3ff4b0383cfdfc14713355d, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: 1138459bbef72f402f32dae1e28d96f174901d4248d959b538b973747c8b06f221ecd81a386a1f915c0a2faaefb9fb8f11e3be39e6c5e2468bf9ae43d9f97757
2024-01-27 22:44:48 -06:00
fanquake
09fe21bb0e
partial Merge #19041: ci: tsan with -stdlib=libc++-10
BACKPORT NOTICE:
this PR doesn't actually swithc to libc++ due to multiple CI failures such as
linking errors or other
------------------
faf62e6ed0ca45db44c370844c3515eb5a8cda12 ci: Remove unused workaround (MarcoFalke)
fa7c8509153bfd2d5b4dcff86ad27dfd73e8788b ci: Install llvm to get llvm symbolizer (MarcoFalke)
fa563cef61e8a217c5e8ec059e174afae61087a5 test: Add more tsan suppressions (MarcoFalke)
fa0cc02c0a029133f080680ae9186002a144738f ci: Mute depends logs completely (MarcoFalke)
fa906bf2988c799765a04c484269f890964ec3ee test: Extend tsan suppressions for clang stdlib (MarcoFalke)
fa10d850790bbe52d948659bb1ebbb88fe718065 ci: Use libc++ instead of libstdc++ for tsan (MarcoFalke)
fa0d5ee1126a8cff9f30f863eb8f5c78bf57e168 ci: Set halt_on_error=1 for tsan (MarcoFalke)
fa2ffe87f794caa74f80c1c2d6e6067ee4849632 ci: Deduplicate DOCKER_EXEC (MarcoFalke)
fac2eeeb9d718bdb892eef9adf333ea61ba8f3d0 cirrus: Remove no longer needed install step (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  According to the [ThreadSanitizer docs](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html#current-status):
  >  C++11 threading is supported with **llvm libc++**.

  For example, the thread sanitizer build is currently not checking for double lock of mutexes.

  Fixes (partially) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19038#issuecomment-632138003

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK faf62e6ed0ca45db44c370844c3515eb5a8cda12
  fanquake:
    ACK faf62e6ed0ca45db44c370844c3515eb5a8cda12
  hebasto:
    ACK faf62e6ed0ca45db44c370844c3515eb5a8cda12, maybe re-organize commits to modify suppressions in a single one?

Tree-SHA512: 98ce5154b4736dfb811ffdb6e6f63a7bc25fe50d3b73134404a8f3715ad53626c31f9c8132dbacf85de47b9409f1e17a4399e35f78b1da30b1577167ea2982ad
2024-01-27 22:44:47 -06:00