0ea5d70b4756f376342417e0019490233cb4a918 Updated comment for the condition where a transaction relay is denied (glowang)
be01449cc8eb7bb97531a967f5d1dcc7b8865d1e Add test for param interaction b/w -blocksonly and -whitelistforcerelay (glowang)
Pull request description:
Related to: #18428
When -blocksonly is turned on, a node would still relay transactions from whitelisted peers. This funcitonality has not been tested.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0ea5d70b4756f376342417e0019490233cb4a918
Tree-SHA512: 4e99c88281cb518cc67f5f3be7171a7b413933047b5d24a04bb3ff2210a82e914d69079f64cd5bac9206ec435e21a622c8e69cedbc2ccb39d2328ac5c01668e5
6981de4435573ad44ee53fd5efc10894866ed2f9 doc: fix wording of alertnotify (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
The documentation of the `alertnotify` startup option no longer matches the implementation.
Currently the alert is only triggered by `DoWarning` (as part of `CChainstate::UpdateTip` when blocks containing unknown versionbits are detected on the network, indicating that there may be an upcoming softfork which you don't know about), but not when we see a "really long fork":
2825c41a61/src/validation.cpp (L2418-L2433)
I think it would be desirable in a follow-up PR to implement the logic to alert on a (really) long fork, but not to alert for "partition detection" (abnormally slow/fast blocks). `PartitionChecker` code was removed in ab8be98fdb
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
ACK 6981de4435
achow101:
ACK 6981de4435573ad44ee53fd5efc10894866ed2f9
Tree-SHA512: ea124f53ca1db803ba93d649f4bc983484c47fb5fe7fa61a8eb32fcbc7425f67d8578e66a6ba70202e13868fe8add0103306dede3b1edd1d3261ffb9c1042b87
bf044ef9ecc93a69619cbaa9fa2b874d5fc06932 build: specify hosts for qrencode package (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Similar to how we specify the OS's we build Qt for, specify which OS's
we will build qrencode for (a qt dependency). This commit alone doesn't
change anything, but when we start supporting other OS's, i.e #23948,
where we wont support qt (or at least initially), it'll skip building
the qrencode package, which would be unused.
I'll rebase the other *BSD changes on top of this.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bf044ef9ecc93a69619cbaa9fa2b874d5fc06932, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f11f122704a664dd77d8da0b7e9b95d44b2f1514d0199deed9b8b8ad0d8883a1de1f444b796c5f4681f423a380c3905fce720d7d2b788130162c907c2ce3b
e9f948c72790136656df6056fd9e3698f360e077 build: Convert warnings into errors when testing for -fstack-clash-protection (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Apple clang version 12.0.5 (clang-1205.0.22.9) that is a part of Xcode 12.5, and is based on LLVM clang 11.1.0, fires spammy warnings:
```
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fstack-clash-protection' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
```
From the https://github.com/apple/llvm-project:
```
$ git log --oneline | grep 'stack-clash-protection'
00065d5cbd02 Revert "-fstack-clash-protection: Return an actual error when used on unsupported OS"
4d59c8fdb955 -fstack-clash-protection: Return an actual error when used on unsupported OS
df3bfaa39071 [Driver] Change -fnostack-clash-protection to -fno-stack-clash-protection
68e07da3e5d5 [clang][PowerPC] Enable -fstack-clash-protection option for ppc64
515bfc66eace [SystemZ] Implement -fstack-clash-protection
e67cbac81211 Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86
454621160066 Revert "Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86"
0fd51a4554f5 Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86
658495e6ecd4 Revert "Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86"
e229017732bc Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86
b03c3d8c6209 Revert "Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86"
4a1a0690ad68 Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86
f6d98429fcdb Revert "Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86"
39f50da2a357 Support -fstack-clash-protection for x86
```
I suppose, that Apple clang-1205.0.22.9 ends with on of the "Revert..." commits.
This PR prevents using of the `-fstack-clash-protection` flag if it causes warnings.
---
System: macOS Big Sur 11.3 (20E232).
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
re-ACK e9f948c72790136656df6056fd9e3698f360e077
Sjors:
tACK e9f948c72790136656df6056fd9e3698f360e077 on macOS 11.3.1
Tree-SHA512: 30186da67f9b0f34418014860c766c2e7f622405520f1cbbc1095d4aa4038b0a86014d76076f318a4b1b09170a96d8167c21d7f53a760e26017f486e1a7d39d4
785f9cc46a43661c63a5ec56a9e82f4ce9d42f44 refactor: init: mark fReset const (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Small thing, but hey - it doesn't change.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 785f9cc46a43661c63a5ec56a9e82f4ce9d42f44
Tree-SHA512: 3cb8d7037f517162f6315d561accc4932b0f1e340162c3283871433f2e355d57b3740c9d2e953ce33fbfa3b277c8437f91955fb70331b3fe9c8e6a8589dc2b49
