778cd0d88d8d6dd22d7f0fb740f3ca3dbb2280a1 [tests] Remove getnettotals/getpeerinfo consistency test (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We make no guarantees about consistency between RPC calls.
Alternative to 18784
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 778cd0d88d8d6dd22d7f0fb740f3ca3dbb2280a1
troygiorshev:
ACK 778cd0d88d8d6dd22d7f0fb740f3ca3dbb2280a1 after reading discussion on 18784, code review, ran test
Tree-SHA512: 438333a111cc93a09680cec47f13fbe03557d4803e5d826aec6f72e5afea62a088622645f0756e8fd2c9182c2a69ccca867d4d6fed2250364bee2b6c834adb1a
398045ba8b3694931069f88ec95553b3207dd1a6 cli -netinfo: print oversized/extreme ping times as "-" (Jon Atack)
773f4c99c00c0b1d8c1b53cb99ba571337100953 cli -netinfo: handle longer tor v3 local addresses (Jon Atack)
33e987452f869c279f2491499939e51e0af8364c cli -netinfo: make age column variable-width (Jon Atack)
f8a1c4d9469cb496fdafaf6f4d94977687df9190 cli -netinfo: various quick updates and fixes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Quick fixups and updates for v0.21.0:
- [x] handle larger BIP155 `addrv2` addresses
- [x] add Signet chain
- [x] add an additional space between the `net` and `mping` columns; add missing `tinyformat` and `algorithm` headers
- [x] s/uptime/age/ per 0xB10C suggestion, and make the column auto-adjusting variable width
- [x] display `-` for oversized mping/ping times like `1.17348e+06`, as reported by practicalswift
Edit: removed the release note commit, as this PR was not merged before the notes were moved to the wiki. It's here:
```
- A new `bitcoin-cli -netinfo` command returns a network peer connections
dashboard that displays data from the `getpeerinfo` and `getnetworkinfo` RPCs
in a human-readable format. An optional integer argument from `0` to `4` may
be passed to see various levels of detail. (#19643)
```
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK 398045ba8b3694931069f88ec95553b3207dd1a6
Emzy:
Tested ACK 398045ba8b3694931069f88ec95553b3207dd1a6
Tree-SHA512: 0625ee840141bafbfcaf8f1fce53f8f850ae91721b2bdad4279372da87c18a1fe3a214d90bfdbbabdf6da38d58290d7dd0f1109b4e2ca5d20cacf417d6ced0f9
fa299ac27364bd7a59e6fb7e0c4ce476f2deec40 test: Speed up wallet_resendwallettransactions test with mockscheduler RPC (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also fixes#20143
ACKs for top commit:
guggero:
ACK fa299ac2
Tree-SHA512: 024ced4aa5f5c266e24fd0583d47b45b19c2a6ae25a06fabeacaa0ac996eec0c45f11cc34b2df17d01759b78ed31a991aa86978aafcc76cb0017382f601bf85a
c82336c493b112160d781974d4066fcb956b85f6 Remove references to CreateWalletFromFile (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`CWallet::CreateWalletFromFile()` was removed in 8b5e7297c02f3100a9cb27bfe206e3fc617ec173 but these references remain.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK c82336c493b112160d781974d4066fcb956b85f6
Tree-SHA512: 3dd50fe0cd5a60bbc96d265107d4739f3e08f943435f3772038963ac4be9e4a87a863412ac0d571226ea66d71550b17b52f01b9d46a6282d49feae1508fd682e
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Trivial refactor to enable this to be const
## What was done?
Used a lambda and const
## How Has This Been Tested?
Compiling
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
fa4bc897fc9332a5666ca2f3e78492cd67ee6128 fuzz: Fail if message type is not fuzzed (MarcoFalke)
faefed8cd5d26a485f5f6df824d7c90967c826f3 fuzz: Count message type fuzzers before main() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`process_message_*` is a nice way to quickly fuzz a single message type. However, the offered message types are outdated and all BIPs implemented in the last years are missing.
Fix that by adding them and failing when the number of message types don't add up.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4bc897fc9332a5666ca2f3e78492cd67ee6128: patch looks correct and touches only `src/test/fuzz/`
Tree-SHA512: 8c98374b50fb4ab2ff2550daeab4c6e9f486bfe847466d217d4bc97d119adc99a82b87b56f47535b1cf8f844232bc7fa1230712a9147cda514ae78851556f988
fac726b1b8331b267973138bbd2bff5304774315 doc: Fixup docs in fuzz/script_assets_test_minimizer.cpp (MarcoFalke)
fafca47adc2476f19f7926de4d55b64b0286e41c fuzz: Hide script_assets_test_minimizer (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is not an actual fuzz target. It is a hack to exploit the built-in capability of fuzz engines to measure coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fac726b1b8331b267973138bbd2bff5304774315: patch looks correct and touches only `src/test/fuzz/`
Tree-SHA512: 0652dd8d9e95746b0906be4044467435d8204a34a30366ae9bdb75b9cb0788d429db7cedf2760fd543565d9d4f7ee206873ed10a29dd715a792a26337f65b53c
eecb7ab105a4a59d09cd55b124c5ad563846fe11 [doc] clarify -peertimeout and -timeout descriptions (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
The debug-only option `-peertimeout` is used to delay `InactivityCheck()`, whereas the `-timeout` option specifies socket timeouts (`nConnectTimeout`). The current descriptions are a bit misleading and hard to tell apart. I think it would save dev/review time to update them 🤷
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK eecb7ab105a4a59d09cd55b124c5ad563846fe11 nice doc fixup
jnewbery:
ACK eecb7ab105a4a59d09cd55b124c5ad563846fe11
Tree-SHA512: 71d2e6c31664b9f7f0b053ecf3be21c6c55472553fa7478d8526ba3be8d54979bceafca63d87b8b2488c11f409c332ac795da613ff8101546b18d9cd8bcceb50
8f0b64fb513e8c6cdd1f115856100a4ef5afe23e Better error messages for invalid addresses (Bezdrighin)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses #20809.
We add more detailed error messages in case an invalid address is provided inside the 'validateaddress' and 'getaddressinfo' RPC calls. This also covers the case when a user provides an address from a wrong network.
We also add a functional test to test the new error messages.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 8f0b64fb513e8c6cdd1f115856100a4ef5afe23e
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 8f0b64fb513e8c6cdd1f115856100a4ef5afe23e
Tree-SHA512: ca0f806ab573e96b79e98d9f8c810b81fa99c638d9b5e4d99dc18c8bd2568e6a802ec305fdfb2983574a97a19a46fd53b77645f8078fb77e9deb24ad2a22cf93
7487bc9900d28e1b5361cba882fd8783aafc7092 Fix BlockToJsonVerbose benchmark (Martin Ankerl)
Pull request description:
Currently it was not possible to run just the BlockToJsonVerbose benchmark because it did not set up everything it needed, running `bench_bitcoin -filter=BlockToJsonVerbose` caused this assert to fail:
```
bench_bitcoin: chainparams.cpp:506: const CChainParams& Params(): Assertion `globalChainParams' failed.
```
Initializing TestingSetup fixes this.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Tested ACK 7487bc9900d28e1b5361cba882fd8783aafc7092 🐎
Tree-SHA512: 27b9702cb4bacc0475710f7b31f41844e83b8a0787685380749505d179aba724728604d4e4e2e3b3cb38cde88ab12f170881b5d3eb615872ee84632e85312166
… best height
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform wants to know the height of the bestchainlock when they call
submitchainlock; sooo we change the API of submitchainlock to also
return the height
## What was done?
Adjust API and tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
New tests added for this behavior
## Breaking Changes
Not really any; I **guess** that return value could be considered
breaking change; but going from nothing -> something feels unlikely to
break anything although it in theory could.
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
BACKPORT NOTICE:
define/endif moved in original backport but some changes are not backported yet
---------
fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loop (MarcoFalke)
fafc5290538fde76c3780976f4b2c11dc9f24d19 test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=no (MarcoFalke)
faf58ab139949ca35b33217d010b350c9a59c61d ci: Add --with-libs=no to one ci config (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`script_assets_test` doesn't call libbitcoinconsensus, so it seems confusing to require it
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 - looks ok to me.
Tree-SHA512: 8744fef64c5d7dc19a0ef4ae9b3df5b3f356253bf000f12723064794c5e50df071824d436059985f1112d94c1b530b65cbeb6b8435114a91b195480620eafc59
faf2999e2515c47108dc3d376dbd1c0fce4d6103 cirrus: Use kvm to avoid spurious CI failures in the default virtualization cluster (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Try to fix#20093
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faf2999e2515c47108dc3d376dbd1c0fce4d6103
hebasto:
ACK faf2999e2515c47108dc3d376dbd1c0fce4d6103, the related doc:
Tree-SHA512: 156aa2ce5a5dde11570f7f90f9d51be540a5469f090033ab6f337b2c46347741469e109f9566f4b7c424339483d61192b91102021f5db38823ce4cf4428e5671
33df8d46bb4b6daca91db208d3d1629d3c1e500c ci: Build Arm64 on Travis without functional tests (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The Travis Arm64 env is a pretty big PITA for quite a while now. It simply seems to time out due to a lack of resources as far as I can tell from my research into the matter.
I have reported the issue in August and received no response: https://travis-ci.community/t/arm64-failing-without-message/9775. Others have complained about similar issues with Arm64 over the past year. The explanation for this is probably that this env is still considered to be in beta: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures.
Considering the high frequency of failures (I didn't run any numbers, just based on my personal observations) and the beta status I would suggest that we shorten the runtime by removing part of the test suite until the env is more stable. I would suggest removing functional tests since it should help for sure but maybe there are other ideas.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 33df8d46bb4b6daca91db208d3d1629d3c1e500c
Tree-SHA512: 55b0c658b526611d16a26e9508611ddeecbfbd842ec064ada61d188a8be2f473e080c2a35746a9aae8006b11b0c2ab9dd4639b0f3004ecf821506e26c7345972
fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8 ci: Double tsan CPU and Memory to avoid global timeout (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fix#19864
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8 -- patch looks correct
hebasto:
ACK fa8e1487144eab237ffd291397355ef4801f46f8, according to https://cirrus-ci.org/guide/linux/ the limits are:
Tree-SHA512: b6d522290bfe80ed7453387b811628bf42c7657aa6a84d2f5984c8bb16f9857a71eabc6b8a4d63b84227d59b41a8ed7dd85d86cae5628dc9cf6b85bd365248d7
fa0538e94db26dd84e02aac1cf174b79729dae72 ci: Set cirrus RAM to 8GB (MarcoFalke)
fa41810d0e87f9f9a2e39be238b9598be02646d0 ci: Run valgrind fuzzer on cirrus (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The first commit should fix the 50min timeout in forked repos. Similar to #19424. E.g. https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin-core/gui/builds/718322267
The second commit should fix#19744
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: c765098dfa913ca49b1d1eee99aaa83e4b9eb191b7ad5e652e3f04744fe8670dd3ef4215832b8e2b5bac0273d24f607fc275e72f566326108ba42ab57228ffd4
7bf04e358a6550ac9851f1b2d87795927fc5ff4b build: remove mostly pointless BOOST_PROCESS macro (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Performing a series of link checks for a Boost component that is
header-only doesn't make much sense, and currently means we just have
another confusing Boost macro in our tree. I'm not sure why this was
originally done this way; maybe Sjors or luke-jr can elaborate (#15382 (929cda5470f98d1ef85c05b1cad4e2fb9227e3b0))?
The macro also has the side-effect of producing confusing error
messages. i.e in #20744, the CI is currently failing with:
```bash
checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800) lib path in "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib"... yes
checking for boostlib >= 1.58.0 (105800)... yes
checking whether the Boost::Process library is available... yes
configure: error: Could not find a version of the Boost::Process library!
```
This isn't useful, given there is no such thing as a `Boost::Process` library.
This PR just removes the macro entirely, but maintains a `--with-boost-process`
(defaulting to off), flag to configure. Hopefully this will also be
removed, in favour of `--enable/disable-external-signer` if/when #16546
is merged.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7bf04e358a6550ac9851f1b2d87795927fc5ff4b
Tree-SHA512: b270a0250f32df2078f986c165b8977967d8c06df80bf2773f3442f74b395a3bfa6544af1024d9b6524d90d47a0f6304194b3aced0e2ecb88e75916da945ccb6
31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0 [util] add RunCommandParseJSON (Sjors Provoost)
c17f54ee535faaedf9033717403e1f775b5f1530 [ci] use boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
32128ba682033560d6eb2e4848a9f77a842016d2 [doc] include Doxygen comments for HAVE_BOOST_PROCESS (Sjors Provoost)
3c84d85f7d218fa27e9343c5cd1a55e519218980 [build] msvc: add boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
c47e4bbf0b44f2de1278f9538124ec98ee0815bb [build] make boost-process opt-in (Sjors Provoost)
929cda5470f98d1ef85c05b1cad4e2fb9227e3b0 configure: add ax_boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
8314c23d7b39fc36dde8b40b03b6efbe96f85698 [depends] boost: patch unused variable in boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Prerequisite for external signer support in #16546. Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This adds a new dependency [boost process](https://github.com/boostorg/process/tree/boost-1.64.0). This is part of Boost since 1.64 which is part of `depends`. Because the minimum Boost version is 1.47, this functionality is skipped for older versions of Boost.
Use `./configure --with-boost-process` to opt in, which checks for the presence of Boost::Process.
We add `UniValue runCommandParseJSON(const std::string& strCommand)` to `system.{h,cpp}` which calls an arbitrary command and processes the JSON returned by it. This is currently only called by the test suite.
~For testing purposes this adds a new regtest-only RPC method `runcommand`, as well as `test/mocks/command.py` used by functional tests.~ (this is no longer the case)
TODO:
- [ ] review boost process in #15440
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0
hebasto:
re-ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, only rebased (verified with `git range-diff`) and removed an unintentional tab character since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15382#pullrequestreview-458371035) review.
meshcollider:
Very light utACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, although I am not very confident with build stuff.
promag:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, don't mind the nit.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0. I left some comments below that could be ignored or followed up later. The current change is clean and comprehensive.
Tree-SHA512: c506e747014b263606e1f538ed4624a8ad7bcf4e025cb700c12cc5739964e254dc04a2bbb848996b170e2ccec3fbfa4fe9e2b3976b191222cfb82fc3e6ab182d
a76dafa51dd16e3f1ed665f6f7b6b2b6a708b9b4 ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A temporary workaround for #19448.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 47b83ff373e710bc9ba8c3661f9850a14417436028c42eb7765d21337ef25faaac4cf8cf93be844ae592d40264934d7d2f6b7ba0ab6c7209fc0da8fc13067769
fa8e6df282af0d396d75b03721f1b59a520ced19 ci: Run tsan ci config on cirrus (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes bitcoin-core/gui#12
Copied description from #19321:
Currently it is not possible to use travis in forked repositories due to the 50 minute limit on builds. A fresh build (uncached) of the thread sanitizer config takes more than 50 minutes.
One approach to fix this could be to throw away tests until the run time is less than 50 minutes. However, the risk of being blind of failures in the thrown away tests is not worth the gain. Also, to detect them, one has to run the tsan configuration nightly and failures could only be detected post-merge.
Another approach would be to ask travis support to raise the limit for a forked repository. This is a tedious and manual one-by-one process, so I'd rather not.
Finally, a different ci provider can be used, since the config files are designed to be platform-agnostic. This is what I picked.
I kept all settings identical to the travis machine for now. Both providers run in the google cloud, so this should be a "move-only".
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa8e6df282af0d396d75b03721f1b59a520ced19 - my understanding is that test coverage remains the same. Just swapping providers to work-around the Travis time-limit in other repos.
Tree-SHA512: 26fed248a4f743107160d3b9e5df57fa0be280fd065ae6fece83d254f59d58ccf3e11a245519d158da109c47b053f62ee8756215008541973c65dc28c4efb748
a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb test: move TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA into native tsan setup (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`feature_block.py` is being run in the tsan job, i.e [here](https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/703122309), even though it should be excluded. My hasty assumption is that this will fix it. In any case, all other instances of `TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA` seem to have moved out of `.travis.yml` and into the different CI configurations.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb
practicalswift:
ACK a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb -- patch looks correct
hebasto:
ACK a92e48b02df545e620a7b1de74f647f46413d3fb, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 86057bef2cc87c6acdbbf94f8cd7a5147510448c3e67aacde8daf247e3ccf649cfc5afbbd10693e084f426042d98150616c0e49bfa5f32b949dff9cebd2fd95d
fa2eb3d5d6819e42bfcec8a9f02b99438fe718b9 ci: Run asan ci config on cirrus (MarcoFalke)
fa93527738a62ebc13305adcb0fd2b5128073bbc cirrus: Clear dummy task (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently it is not possible to use travis in forked repositories due to the 50 minute limit on builds. A fresh build (uncached) of the address sanitizer config takes more than 50 minutes.
One approach to fix this could be to throw away tests until the run time is less than 50 minutes. However, the risk of being blind of failures in the thrown away tests is not worth the gain. Also, to detect them, one has to run the asan configuration nightly and failures could only be detected post-merge.
Another approach would be to ask travis support to raise the limit for a forked repository. This is a tedious and manual one-by-one process, so I'd rather not.
Finally, a different ci provider can be used, since the config files are designed to be platform-agnostic. This is what I picked.
I kept all settings identical to the travis machine for now. Both providers run in the google cloud, so this should be a "move-only".
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa2eb3d5d6819e42bfcec8a9f02b99438fe718b9
Tree-SHA512: 159d7dc6f5b24583e941282cdd40465b15db787f0a658a3e81a7b1a22abdb4cb573709b9b5c4465523e0ba0060b17a68fbdbda7a9ecdeb649f31535d377bbe75
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Dashmate wanted a way to know if it is safe to restart the masternode.
This new RPC indicates the number of active DKG sessions, and the number
of blocks until next potential DKG.
## What was done?
Examples of responses:
`{'active_dkgs': 0, 'next_dkg': 22}`
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_rotation.py` was updated
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC `getassetunlockstatuses` is now accepting an extra optional
parameter `height`.
When a valid `height` is passed, then the RPC returns the status of
AssetUnlock indexes up to this specific block. (Requested by Platform
team)
## What was done?
Note that in order to avoid cases that can lead to deterministic result,
when `height` is passed, then the only `chainlocked` and `unknown`
outcomes are possible.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_asset_locks.py` was updated.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Trivial bug: `keypoolrefill` internally updates the status of the
progress bar each second.
```
m_storage.UpdateProgress(strMsg, static_cast<int>(dProgress));
```
However it can happen that one second is not enough time to make
significant progress and
`static_cast<int>(dProgress) = 0`.
Calling the function with `0` as progress opens a new progress bar and
this led to problems like #5730
## What was done?
trivially make sure to update the progress only if the parameter is >0
## How Has This Been Tested?
rpc does not spam anymore
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [X] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
519cae8fd6e44aef3470415d7c5e12acb0acd9f4 gui: Delay interfaces::Node initialization (Russell Yanofsky)
102abff9eb6c267af64f2a3560712147d1896e13 gui: Replace interface::Node references with pointers (Russell Yanofsky)
91aced7c7e6e75c1f5896b7e3843015177f32748 gui: Remove unused interfaces::Node references (Russell Yanofsky)
e1336316250ab5cb0ed654b1e593378a6e0769ce gui: Partially revert #10244 gArgs and Params changes (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
This is a partial revert of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10244. It changes gui code to go back to using gArgs and Params() functions directly instead of using interfaces::Node to handle arguments.
These changes were originally pushed as part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19461. Motivation is to support a new GUI process connecting to an already running node process. Details are explained in commit messages, but in addition to spawning a new bitcoin-node process, we want bitcoin-gui to connect to an existing bitcoin-node process. So for that reason it should be able to parse its own parameters, rather than rely on the node.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 519cae8fd6, only change is rebase and addressed nits of my previous review last week 🌄
Tree-SHA512: 9c339dd82ba78bcc7b887b84d872f35ccc7dfa3d271691e6eafe8a2048cbbe3bdde1e810ce33d0714d75d048c9de3470e9e9b6f8306a6047d1cb3548f6858dc8
241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247 refactor: qt: Use vQueueNotifications.clear() (João Barbosa)
989e579d07bb5031639060b717f7a0be15d10e29 qt: Make transaction notification queue wallet specific (João Barbosa)
7b3b2303f44031c3545651858f697a495c3ea37a move-only: Define TransactionNotification before TransactionTablePriv (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Currently `vQueueNotifications` holds transactions of any wallet, but the queue is dispatched on a given wallet and it assumes notifications are of that wallet.
This means that some transactions can be missed if multiple wallets are loaded.
Fix this by having a queue for each wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247
hebasto:
ACK 241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 241434200ec2067673d8522fee4f1228abfd8247. Only change is dropping one commit
Tree-SHA512: 61beac5a16ed659e3a25ad145dbceafcef963aaf8f9838355298949ec2324e2bd760f59353cd251d30cf0334d8dc1642a1f3821d8a9eec092533b581f6ce86db
1afcd41a906e6417925e80578c0d850d269dc008 [net] Remove CombinerAll (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This was introduced in 9519a9a4 for use with boost signals. Boost signals
have not been used in net since 8ad663c1, so this code is unused.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1afcd41a906e6417925e80578c0d850d269dc008
laanwj:
code review ACK 1afcd41a906e6417925e80578c0d850d269dc008
Tree-SHA512: a4313142afb88bf12f15abc4e717b3b0d0b40d2d5db2638494af3181e1cd680d7b036087050fc0e0dfe606228849a2e20ae85135908a9ebe8ff2130f163920e1
82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Fixes#19523, adding a simple test to `rpc_psbt.py` that checks that the decodepsbt fee matches the one given by the wallet (`walletcreatefundedpsbt`). This is in particular important for PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type set.
Example test run after reverting commit 75122780e2c46505d977e24c5612dfa9442ab754 ("Increment input value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt"):
```
$ test/functional/rpc_psbt.py
2020-07-26T11:31:44.862000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__sutcd4y
20.00007580
2020-07-26T11:31:47.073000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 118, in main
self.run_test()
File "test/functional/rpc_psbt.py", line 166, in run_test
assert_equal(decoded['fee'], created_psbt['fee'])
File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 49, in assert_equal
raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args))
AssertionError: not(20.00007580 == 0.00007580)
2020-07-26T11:31:47.125000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
......
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84
Tree-SHA512: 296b8a701f851d482ef6200c6cbf0cf0257a79a828ac6dbc39b05d8c2d839c6fdb9d3f5a084015295cfa3eac7c11faa2f2d52e619c11627b04c75150eead8330
