027fdb8 When/if the copyright line does not mention Bitcoin Core developers, add a second line to copyrights in -version, About dialog, and splash screen (Luke Dashjr)
cc2095e Rewrite FormatParagraph to handle newlines within input strings correctly (Luke Dashjr)
cddffaf Bugfix: Include COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS_SUBSTITUTION in Makefile substitutions so it gets passed to extract-strings correctly (Luke Dashjr)
29598e4 Move PACKAGE_URL to configure.ac (Luke Dashjr)
78ec83d splashscreen: Resize text to fit exactly (Luke Dashjr)
3cae140 Bugfix: Actually use _COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS_SUBSTITUTION everywhere (Luke Dashjr)
4d5a3df Bugfix: gitian-descriptors: Add missing python-setuptools requirement for OS X (biplist module) (Luke Dashjr)
e4ab5e5 Bugfix: Correct copyright year in Mac DMG background image (Luke Dashjr)
917b1d0 Set copyright holders displayed in notices separately from the package name (Luke Dashjr)
c39a6ff Travis & gitian-osx: Use depends for ds_store and mac_alias modules (Luke Dashjr)
902ccde depends: Add mac_alias to depends (Luke Dashjr)
82a2d98 depends: Add ds_store to depends (Cory Fields)
de619a3 depends: Pass PYTHONPATH along to configure (Cory Fields)
e611b6e macdeploy: Use rsvg-convert rather than cairosvg (Luke Dashjr)
63bcdc5 More complicated package name substitution for Mac deployment (Luke Dashjr)
1a6c67c Parameterise 2009 in translatable copyright strings (Luke Dashjr)
d5f4683 Unify package name to as few places as possible without major changes (Luke Dashjr)
This is a well-intentioned but realistically annoying warning. Unfortunately,
it's too easy for a warning in one header to cause dozens of repeated warnings.
(cherry picked from commit cf390dff89)
Disabling warnings can be tricky, because doing so can cause a different
compiler to create new warnings about unsupported disable flags. Also, some
warnings don't surface until they're paired with another warning (gcc). For
example, adding "-Wno-foo" won't cause any trouble, but if there's a legitimate
warning emitted, the "unknown option -Wno-foo" will show up as well.
Work around this in 2 ways:
1. When checking to see if -Wno-foo is supported, check for "-Wfoo" instead.
2. Enable -Werror while checking 1.
If "-Werror -Wfoo" compiles, "-Wno-foo" is almost guaranteed to be supported.
-Werror itself is also checked. If that fails to compile by itself, it likely
means that the user added a flag that adds a warning. In that case, -Werror
won't be used while checking, and the build may be extra noisy. The user would
need to fix the bad input flag.
Also, silence 2 more additional warnings that can show up post-c++11.
(cherry picked from commit 63b3111f84)
This is a well-intentioned but realistically annoying warning. Unfortunately,
it's too easy for a warning in one header to cause dozens of repeated warnings.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10489
* Remove orphan state wipe from UnloadBlockIndex.
As orphan state is now "network state", like in
d6ea737be1,
UnloadBlockIndex is only used during init if we end up reindexing
to clear our block state so that we can start over. However, at
that time no connections have been brought up as CConnman hasn't
been started yet, so all of the network processing state logic is
empty when its called.
* Move network-msg-processing code out of main to its own file
* Rename the remaining main.{h,cpp} to validation.{h,cpp}
* Build against system UniValue when available
* doc: Add UniValue to build instructions
* Bugfix: The var is LIBUNIVALUE,not LIBBITCOIN_UNIVALUE
* Change default configure option --with-system-univalue to "no"
* Bugfix: Always include univalue in DIST_SUBDIRS
* LDADD dependency order shuffling
* build-unix: Update UniValue build conditions
OBJCXX's std flags don't get defined by our cxx macro. Rather than hard-coding
to c++11, just force OBJCXX to be the same as CXX unless the user specified
otherwise.
* c++11: detect and correct for boost builds with an incompatible abi
This is ugly, but temporary. boost::filesystem will likely be dropped soon
after c++11 is enabled. Otherwise, we could simply roll our own copy_file. I've
fixed this at the buildsystem level for now in order to avoid mixing in
functional changes.
Explanation:
If boost (prior to 1.57) was built without c++11, it emulated scoped enums
using c++98 constructs. Unfortunately, this implementation detail leaked into
the abi. This was fixed in 1.57.
When building against that installed version using c++11, the headers pick up
on the native c++11 scoped enum support and enable it, however it will fail to
link. This can be worked around by disabling c++11 scoped enums if linking will
fail.
Add an autoconf test to determine incompatibility. At build-time, if native
enums are being used (a c++11 build), and force-disabling them causes a
successful link, we can be sure that there's an incompatibility and enable the
work-around.
* c++11: add scoped enum fallbacks to CPPFLAGS rather than defining them locally
Due to include ordering, defining in one place was not enough to ensure correct
usage. Use global defines so that we don't have to worry abou this ordering.
Also add a comment in configure about the test.
* Remove unneeded include that was added by bitcoin commits
* build: Enable C++11 build, require C++11 compiler
Implements #6211.
* depends: use c++11
* build: update ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx to serial 4
* build: force a c++ standard to be specified
Newer compilers may switch to newer standards by default. For example, gcc6
uses std=gnu++14 by default.
* c++11: fix libbdb build against libc++ in c++11 mode
atomic_init clashes with
* c++11: CAccountingEntry must be defined before use in a list
c++11ism. This fixes builds against libc++.
All names containing bitcoinconsensus remaned to contain dashconsensus.
This is needed to avoid conflicts with real bitcoinconsensus library
shipped with Bitcoin Core.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
This removes the following executables from the binary gitian release:
- test_bitcoin-qt[.exe]
- bench_bitcoin[.exe]
@jonasschnelli and me discussed this on IRC a few days ago - unlike the
normal `bitcoin_tests` which is useful to see if it is safe to run
bitcoin on a certain OS/environment combination, there is no good reason
to include these. Better to leave them out to reduce the download
size.
Sizes from the 0.12 release:
```
2.4M bitcoin-0.12.0/bin/bench_bitcoin.exe
22M bitcoin-0.12.0/bin/test_bitcoin-qt.exe
```
This is a cherry-pick of a4625acb with minor conflict
resolution.
Conflicts:
src/Makefile.am
=====
leveldb: integrate leveldb into our buildsystem
leveldb's buildsystem causes us a few problems:
- breaks out-of-tree builds
- forces flags used for some tools
- limits cross builds
Rather than continuing to add wrappers around it, simply integrate it into our
build.
This removes the following executables from the binary gitian release:
- test_bitcoin-qt[.exe]
- bench_bitcoin[.exe]
@jonasschnelli and me discussed this on IRC a few days ago - unlike the
normal `bitcoin_tests` which is useful to see if it is safe to run
bitcoin on a certain OS/environment combination, there is no good reason
to include these. Better to leave them out to reduce the download
size.
Sizes from the 0.12 release:
```
2.4M bitcoin-0.12.0/bin/bench_bitcoin.exe
22M bitcoin-0.12.0/bin/test_bitcoin-qt.exe
```
Github-Pull: #7776
Rebased-From: f063863d1f
- fix parsing of BIND_NOW with older readelf
- add _IO_stdin_used to ignored exports
For details see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634261#109
- add check-symbols and check-security make targets
These are not added to the default checks because some of them depend on
release-build configs.
- always link librt for glibc back-compat builds
glibc absorbed clock_gettime in 2.17. librt (its previous location) is safe to
link in anyway for back-compat.
Fixes#7420
- add security/symbol checks to gitian
Github-Pull: #7424
Rebased-From: cd27bf51e0475813ba5bf3d3eaf78ea8ce872118a81c87fafc
Checking libcrypto for a function after we've already found a (possibly
different) libcrypto is not what we want to do here.
pkg-config might've found a cross lib while AC_CHECK_LIB may find a different
or native one.
Run a link-test against the lib that's already been found instead.
Because Python is (going to be) used to run the RPC tests, when
gathering coverage data with lcov, it is explicitly checked, whether
Python is really available.
