## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
On my local kubuntu linters have way too much spam
## What was done?
See each commit
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run locally. Amount of warnings decreased from thousands to fewer
amount. Excluding typos, they are:
```
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:1420:5: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:1426:5: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/client.cpp:655:26: warning: Consider using std::copy_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/server.cpp:593:33: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/coinjoin/server.cpp:630:106: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1057:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1068:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1079:13: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1086:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1094:9: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1099:5: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/governance/governance.cpp:1486:34: warning: Consider using std::copy_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/commitment.cpp:102:5: warning: Consider using std::all_of or std::none_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/instantsend.cpp:820:38: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:831:102: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/llmq/quorums.h:300:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:301:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:302:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/llmq/quorums.h:303:17: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
src/spork.cpp:119:58: warning: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
src/statsd_client.cpp:234:63: warning: C-style pointer casting [cstyleCast]
Advice not applicable in this specific case? Add an exception by updating
IGNORED_WARNINGS in test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
Consider install flake8-cached for cached flake8 results.
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: error: Source file found twice under different module names: "invalid_txs" and "data.invalid_txs"
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: note: See https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/running_mypy.html#mapping-file-paths-to-modules for more info
test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py: note: Common resolutions include: a) adding `__init__.py` somewhere, b) using `--explicit-package-bases` or adjusting MYPYPATH
Found 1 error in 1 file (errors prevented further checking)
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-python.s
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix failures like https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/6175160403
## What was done?
use `minimumAmount` option in `listunspent` rpc call to avoid picking
coins that are too small for asset lock txes
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `feature_asset_locks.py`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
faa94cb1675d8bd511eb593176cd07aa59465225 test: Check that invalid peer traffic is accounted for (MarcoFalke)
fae243f0cb92b5648d07d0a5033e2f4de862ae99 test: Remove confusing cast to same type (int to int) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Couldn't find a test for this and it seems something we should test, so I wrote one.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK faa94cb16
practicalswift:
ACK faa94cb1675d8bd511eb593176cd07aa59465225: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: efcdd35960045cdfbd14480e16e0d1d09e81eb01670ac541ac2b105e1a63818a157c95853270242234a224880873e79957832bf4231374d7fe81de30f35e3abf
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The architecture of bitcoin assumes that there's no any external class
that processes network messages and knows anything about PeerManager
from net_processing; no any external call for PeerManager::Misbehaving
in bitcoin. All logic related to processing messages are located in
net_processing.
Dash has many many extra types of network messages and many of them
processed by external components such as llmq/signing or
coinjoin/client. Current architecture creates multiple circular
dependency.
## What was done?
That's part II of refactorings.
This PR removes PeerManager from several constructor and let LLMQContext
to forget about PeerManager.
Prior work in this PR: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5782
## What else to do?
Some network messages are processed asynchronously in external
components such as llmq/signing, llmq/instantsend,
llmq/dkgsessionhandler. It doesn't let to refactor them easily, because
they can't just simple return status of processing; status of processing
would be available sometime later and there's need callback or other way
to pass result code without spreading PeerManager over codebase.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Run unit/functional tests
- run a linter test/lint/lint-circular-dependencies.sh
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
To prevent spending withdrawal before that's finalized, mined and
chainlocked, next things should be true:
- txes with spending of unlock and unlock themselves do not receive
islocks. That's true, because IS excluded for txes with no inputs.
- When the unlock is removed from mempool, so are the children.
These functionality has no tests, but that's crucial for consensus be
fine.
## What was done?
Implemented checks to be sure that IS is not send for Withdrawal txes.
Functional test for asset_locks.py are refactored a bit to make it
easier to read.
## How Has This Been Tested?
This PR is tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
9913419cc9db5f8ce7afa0c3774468c330136064 test: remove type: comments in favour of actual annotations (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Now that we require Python 3.6+, we should be using variable type
annotations directly rather than `# type:` comments.
Also takes care of the discarded value issue in p2p_message_capture.py.
See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19509/files#r571674446.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9913419cc9db5f8ce7afa0c3774468c330136064
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 9913419cc9db5f8ce7afa0c3774468c330136064
Tree-SHA512: 63aba5eef6c1320578f66cf8a6d85ac9dbab9d30b0d21e6e966be8216e63606de12321320c2958c67933bf68d10f2e76e9c43928e5989614cea34dde4187aad8
bff7c66e67aa2f18ef70139338643656a54444fe Add documentation to contrib folder (Troy Giorshev)
381f77be858d7417209b6de0b7cd23cb7eb99261 Add Message Capture Test (Troy Giorshev)
e4f378a505922c0f544b4cfbfdb169e884e02be9 Add capture parser (Troy Giorshev)
4d1a582549bc982d55e24585b0ba06f92f21e9da Call CaptureMessage at appropriate locations (Troy Giorshev)
f2a77ff97bec09dd5fcc043d8659d8ec5dfb87c2 Add CaptureMessage (Troy Giorshev)
dbf779d5deb04f55c6e8493ce4e12ed4628638f3 Clean PushMessage and ProcessMessages (Troy Giorshev)
Pull request description:
This PR introduces per-peer message capture into Bitcoin Core. 📓
## Purpose
The purpose and scope of this feature is intentionally limited. It answers a question anyone new to Bitcoin's P2P protocol has had: "Can I see what messages my node is sending and receiving?".
## Functionality
When a new debug-only command line argument `capturemessages` is set, any message that the node receives or sends is captured. The capture occurs in the MessageHandler thread. When receiving a message, it is captured as soon as the MessageHandler thread takes the message off of the vProcessMsg queue. When sending, the message is captured just before the message is pushed onto the vSendMsg queue.
The message capture is as minimal as possible to reduce the performance impact on the node. Messages are captured to a new `message_capture` folder in the datadir. Each node has their own subfolder named with their IP address and port. Inside, received and sent messages are captured into two binary files, msgs_recv.dat and msgs_sent.dat, like so:
```
message_capture/203.0.113.7:56072/msgs_recv.dat
message_capture/203.0.113.7:56072/msgs_sent.dat
```
Because the messages are raw binary dumps, included in this PR is a Python parsing tool to convert the binary files into human-readable JSON. This script has been placed on its own and out of the way in the new `contrib/message-capture` folder. Its usage is simple and easily discovered by the autogenerated `-h` option.
## Future Maintenance
I sympathize greatly with anyone who says "the best code is no code".
The future maintenance of this feature will be minimal. The logic to deserialize the payload of the p2p messages exists in our testing framework. As long as our testing framework works, so will this tool.
Additionally, I hope that the simplicity of this tool will mean that it gets used frequently, so that problems will be discovered and solved when they are small.
## FAQ
"Why not just use Wireshark"
Yes, Wireshark has the ability to filter and decode Bitcoin messages. However, the purpose of the message capture added in this PR is to assist with debugging, primarily for new developers looking to improve their knowledge of the Bitcoin Protocol. This drives the design in a different direction than Wireshark, in two different ways. First, this tool must be convenient and simple to use. Using an external tool, like Wireshark, requires setup and interpretation of the results. To a new user who doesn't necessarily know what to expect, this is unnecessary difficulty. This tool, on the other hand, "just works". Turn on the command line flag, run your node, run the script, read the JSON. Second, because this tool is being used for debugging, we want it to be as close to the true behavior of the node as possible. A lot can happen in the SocketHandler thread that would be missed by Wireshark.
Additionally, if we are to use Wireshark, we are at the mercy of whoever it maintaining the protocol in Wireshark, both as to it being accurate and recent. As can be seen by the **many** previous attempts to include Bitcoin in Wireshark (google "bitcoin dissector") this is easier said than done.
Lastly, I truly believe that this tool will be used significantly more by being included in the codebase. It's just that much more discoverable.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK bff7c66e67aa2f18ef70139338643656a54444fe only some minor changes: 👚
jnewbery:
utACK bff7c66e67aa2f18ef70139338643656a54444fe
theStack:
re-ACK bff7c66e67aa2f18ef70139338643656a54444fe
Tree-SHA512: e59e3160422269221f70f98720b47842775781c247c064071d546c24fa7a35a0e5534e8baa4b4591a750d7eb16de6b4ecf54cbee6d193b261f4f104e28c15f47
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should fix failures like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/6107697452
## What was done?
See inline comments
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run lots of `feature_governance.py` in parallel multiple times
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This pull request is a follow-up to
[some](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5834#discussion_r1470105685)
[feedback](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5834#discussion_r1467009815)
received on [dash#5834](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5834) as
the patterns highlighted were present in different parts of the codebase
and hence not corrected within the PR itself but addressed separately.
This is that separate PR 🙂 (with some additional cleanup of my own)
## What was done?
* This pull request will remain a draft until
[dash#5834](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5834) as it will
introduce more changes that will need to be corrected in this PR.
* Code introduced that is unique to Dash Core (CoinJoin, InstantSend,
etc.) has been excluded from un-Dashification as the purpose of it is to
reduce backport conflicts, which don't apply in those cases.
* `CWallet::CreateTransaction` and the `CreateTransactionTest` fixture
have been excluded as the former originates from
[dash#3668](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3668) and the latter
from [dash#3667](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3667) and are
distinct enough to be unique to Dash Core.
* There are certain Dashifications and SegWit-removals that prove
frustrating as it would break compatibility with programs that rely on
the naming of certain keys
* `getrawmempool`, `getmempoolancestors`, `getmempooldescendants` and
`getmempoolentry` return `vsize` which is currently an alias of `size`.
I have been advised to retain `vsize` in lieu of potential future
developments. (this was originally remedied in
219a1d08973e7ccda6e778218b9a8218b4aae034 but has since been dropped)
* `getaddressmempool`, `getaddressutxos` and `getaddressdeltas` all
return a value with the key `satoshis`. This is frustrating to rename to
`duffs` for compatibility reasons.
* `decodepsbt` returns (if applicable) `non_witness_utxo` which is
frustrating to rename simply to `utxo` for the same reason.
* `analyzepsbt` returns (if applicable) `estimated_vsize` which
frustrating to rename to `estimated_size` for the same reason.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
HD wallets are old-existsing feature, appeared in Dash years ago, but
enabling HD wallets is not trivial task that requires multiple steps and
command line/rpc calls.
Let's have them enabled by default.
## What was done?
- HD wallets are enabled by default. Currently behavior `dashd`,
`dash-qt` are similar to run with option `-usehd=1`
- the rpc `upgradewallet` do not let to upgrade from non-HD wallet to HD
wallet to don't encourage user use non-crypted wallets (postponed till
v21)
- the initialization of ScriptPubKey is updated to be sure that encypted
HD seed is never written on disk (if passphrase is provided)
- enabled and dashified a script `wallet_upgradewallet.py` which test
compatibility between different versions of wallet
## What is not done?
- wallet tool still does not support passhprase, HD seed can appear on
disk
- there's no dialog that show user a mnemonic phrase and encourage him
to make a paper backup
Before removing a command line 'usehd' (backport bitcoin#11250) need to
make at least one major release for fail-over option (if someone wish to
use non-HD wallets only).
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests.
Enabled new functional test `wallet_upgradewallet.py` that has been
backported long time ago but waited this PR to be enabled.
## Breaking Changes
HD wallets are created by default.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Fix failures like https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/6120923632
## What was done?
Handle disconnects and reconnection of the revoked MN in the right
place.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run multiple `feature_dip3_v19.py` in parallel a few times
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
56010f92564a94b0ca6c008c0e6f74a19fad4a2a test: hoist p2p values to test framework constants (Jon Atack)
75447f0893f9ad9bf83d182b301d139430d8de1c test: improve msg sends and p2p disconnections in p2p_invalid_messages (Jon Atack)
57960192a5362ff1a7b996995332535f4c2a25c3 test: refactor test_large_inv() into 3 tests with common method (Jon Atack)
e2b21d8a597c536a8617408d43958bfe9f98a442 test: add p2p_invalid_messages logging (Jon Atack)
9fa494dc0969c61d5ef33708a08923cca19ce091 net: update misbehavior logging for oversized messages (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
...seen while reviewing #19264, #19252, #19304 and #19107:
in `net_processing.cpp`
- make the debug logging for oversized message size misbehavior the same for `addr`, `getdata`, `headers` and `inv` messages
in `p2p_invalid_messages`
- add missing logging
- improve assertions/message sends, move cleanup disconnections outside the assertion scopes
- split a slowish 3-part test into 3 order-independent tests
- add a few p2p constants to the test framework
ACKs for top commit:
troygiorshev:
reACK 56010f92564a94b0ca6c008c0e6f74a19fad4a2a
MarcoFalke:
ACK 56010f9256 🎛
Tree-SHA512: db67b70278f8d4c318907e105af54b54eb3afd15500f9aa0c98034f6fd4bd1cf9ad1663037bd9b237ff4890f3059b37291a6498d8d6ae2cc38efb9f045f73310
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
kudos to kwvg to report issue: he pointed out that functional tests
randomly fail lately.
Bisect pointed out an exact commit: bitcoin#20027 - mockable time
everywhere
## What was done?
Added call `mn.node.mockscheduler` as it is done in 20027 for other
functional tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run 20 times. Without this patch 20% failures; with this patch - zero
failures.
```
test/functional/test_runner.py -j20 feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py feature_llmq_simplepose.py
```
## Breaking Changes
N/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
fa2ecadd0d3283a89d27772dc0275e76277ae17e test: Fix intermittent rpc_net issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The test fails because getpeerinfo and getnettotals are not synchronised, so a `wait_until` is needed for each RPC (separately).
Fixes https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4663366629195776?command=ci#L5034
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa2ecadd0d3283a89d27772dc0275e76277ae17e
Tree-SHA512: 5ea7128801aab8dbe3d9e6737545ff4ee770e4a9c5a2096ba2339a688424f1879ccba6bf8bcb219983acf86eb28af06fc629586613e7fe28aeffadd2c98633e8
778cd0d88d8d6dd22d7f0fb740f3ca3dbb2280a1 [tests] Remove getnettotals/getpeerinfo consistency test (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We make no guarantees about consistency between RPC calls.
Alternative to 18784
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 778cd0d88d8d6dd22d7f0fb740f3ca3dbb2280a1
troygiorshev:
ACK 778cd0d88d8d6dd22d7f0fb740f3ca3dbb2280a1 after reading discussion on 18784, code review, ran test
Tree-SHA512: 438333a111cc93a09680cec47f13fbe03557d4803e5d826aec6f72e5afea62a088622645f0756e8fd2c9182c2a69ccca867d4d6fed2250364bee2b6c834adb1a
fa299ac27364bd7a59e6fb7e0c4ce476f2deec40 test: Speed up wallet_resendwallettransactions test with mockscheduler RPC (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also fixes#20143
ACKs for top commit:
guggero:
ACK fa299ac2
Tree-SHA512: 024ced4aa5f5c266e24fd0583d47b45b19c2a6ae25a06fabeacaa0ac996eec0c45f11cc34b2df17d01759b78ed31a991aa86978aafcc76cb0017382f601bf85a
c82336c493b112160d781974d4066fcb956b85f6 Remove references to CreateWalletFromFile (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`CWallet::CreateWalletFromFile()` was removed in 8b5e7297c02f3100a9cb27bfe206e3fc617ec173 but these references remain.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK c82336c493b112160d781974d4066fcb956b85f6
Tree-SHA512: 3dd50fe0cd5a60bbc96d265107d4739f3e08f943435f3772038963ac4be9e4a87a863412ac0d571226ea66d71550b17b52f01b9d46a6282d49feae1508fd682e
8f0b64fb513e8c6cdd1f115856100a4ef5afe23e Better error messages for invalid addresses (Bezdrighin)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses #20809.
We add more detailed error messages in case an invalid address is provided inside the 'validateaddress' and 'getaddressinfo' RPC calls. This also covers the case when a user provides an address from a wrong network.
We also add a functional test to test the new error messages.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 8f0b64fb513e8c6cdd1f115856100a4ef5afe23e
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 8f0b64fb513e8c6cdd1f115856100a4ef5afe23e
Tree-SHA512: ca0f806ab573e96b79e98d9f8c810b81fa99c638d9b5e4d99dc18c8bd2568e6a802ec305fdfb2983574a97a19a46fd53b77645f8078fb77e9deb24ad2a22cf93
… best height
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform wants to know the height of the bestchainlock when they call
submitchainlock; sooo we change the API of submitchainlock to also
return the height
## What was done?
Adjust API and tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
New tests added for this behavior
## Breaking Changes
Not really any; I **guess** that return value could be considered
breaking change; but going from nothing -> something feels unlikely to
break anything although it in theory could.
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0 [util] add RunCommandParseJSON (Sjors Provoost)
c17f54ee535faaedf9033717403e1f775b5f1530 [ci] use boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
32128ba682033560d6eb2e4848a9f77a842016d2 [doc] include Doxygen comments for HAVE_BOOST_PROCESS (Sjors Provoost)
3c84d85f7d218fa27e9343c5cd1a55e519218980 [build] msvc: add boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
c47e4bbf0b44f2de1278f9538124ec98ee0815bb [build] make boost-process opt-in (Sjors Provoost)
929cda5470f98d1ef85c05b1cad4e2fb9227e3b0 configure: add ax_boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
8314c23d7b39fc36dde8b40b03b6efbe96f85698 [depends] boost: patch unused variable in boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Prerequisite for external signer support in #16546. Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This adds a new dependency [boost process](https://github.com/boostorg/process/tree/boost-1.64.0). This is part of Boost since 1.64 which is part of `depends`. Because the minimum Boost version is 1.47, this functionality is skipped for older versions of Boost.
Use `./configure --with-boost-process` to opt in, which checks for the presence of Boost::Process.
We add `UniValue runCommandParseJSON(const std::string& strCommand)` to `system.{h,cpp}` which calls an arbitrary command and processes the JSON returned by it. This is currently only called by the test suite.
~For testing purposes this adds a new regtest-only RPC method `runcommand`, as well as `test/mocks/command.py` used by functional tests.~ (this is no longer the case)
TODO:
- [ ] review boost process in #15440
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0
hebasto:
re-ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, only rebased (verified with `git range-diff`) and removed an unintentional tab character since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15382#pullrequestreview-458371035) review.
meshcollider:
Very light utACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, although I am not very confident with build stuff.
promag:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, don't mind the nit.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0. I left some comments below that could be ignored or followed up later. The current change is clean and comprehensive.
Tree-SHA512: c506e747014b263606e1f538ed4624a8ad7bcf4e025cb700c12cc5739964e254dc04a2bbb848996b170e2ccec3fbfa4fe9e2b3976b191222cfb82fc3e6ab182d
a76dafa51dd16e3f1ed665f6f7b6b2b6a708b9b4 ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A temporary workaround for #19448.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 47b83ff373e710bc9ba8c3661f9850a14417436028c42eb7765d21337ef25faaac4cf8cf93be844ae592d40264934d7d2f6b7ba0ab6c7209fc0da8fc13067769
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Dashmate wanted a way to know if it is safe to restart the masternode.
This new RPC indicates the number of active DKG sessions, and the number
of blocks until next potential DKG.
## What was done?
Examples of responses:
`{'active_dkgs': 0, 'next_dkg': 22}`
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_rotation.py` was updated
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC `getassetunlockstatuses` is now accepting an extra optional
parameter `height`.
When a valid `height` is passed, then the RPC returns the status of
AssetUnlock indexes up to this specific block. (Requested by Platform
team)
## What was done?
Note that in order to avoid cases that can lead to deterministic result,
when `height` is passed, then the only `chainlocked` and `unknown`
outcomes are possible.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_asset_locks.py` was updated.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Fixes#19523, adding a simple test to `rpc_psbt.py` that checks that the decodepsbt fee matches the one given by the wallet (`walletcreatefundedpsbt`). This is in particular important for PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type set.
Example test run after reverting commit 75122780e2c46505d977e24c5612dfa9442ab754 ("Increment input value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt"):
```
$ test/functional/rpc_psbt.py
2020-07-26T11:31:44.862000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__sutcd4y
20.00007580
2020-07-26T11:31:47.073000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 118, in main
self.run_test()
File "test/functional/rpc_psbt.py", line 166, in run_test
assert_equal(decoded['fee'], created_psbt['fee'])
File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 49, in assert_equal
raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args))
AssertionError: not(20.00007580 == 0.00007580)
2020-07-26T11:31:47.125000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
......
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84
Tree-SHA512: 296b8a701f851d482ef6200c6cbf0cf0257a79a828ac6dbc39b05d8c2d839c6fdb9d3f5a084015295cfa3eac7c11faa2f2d52e619c11627b04c75150eead8330
BACKPORT NOTICE
fixup psbt. all missing changes belongs to src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h/cpp ----- they are related to descriptor wallet!
-------------------
931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Make lint-spelling.py happy (Glenn Willen)
11a0ffb29d1b4dcc55c8826873f340ab4196af21 [gui] Load PSBT from clipboard (Glenn Willen)
a6cb0b0c29d327d01aebb98b0504f317eb19c3dc [gui] PSBT Operations Dialog (sign & broadcast) (Glenn Willen)
5dd0c03ffa3aeaa69d8a3a716f902f450d5eaaec FillPSBT: report number of inputs signed (or would sign) (Glenn Willen)
9e7b23b73387600d175aff8bd5e6624dd51f86e7 Improve TransactionErrorString messages. (Glenn Willen)
Pull request description:
Add a "PSBT Operations" dialog, reached from the "Load PSBT..." menu item, giving options to sign or broadcast the loaded PSBT as appropriate, as well as copying the result to the clipboard or saving it to a file.
This is based on Sjors' #17509, and depends on that PR going in first. (It effectively replaces the small "load PSBT" dialog from that PR with a more feature-rich one.)
Some notes:
* The way I display status information is maybe unusual (a status bar, rather than messageboxes.) I think it's helpful to have the information in it be persistent rather than transitory. But if people dislike it, I would probably move the "current state of the transaction" info to the top line of the main label, and the "what action just happened, and did it succeed" info into a messagebox.
* I don't really know much about the translation/localization stuff. I put tr() in all the places it seemed like it ought to go. I did not attempt to translate the result of TransactionErrorString (which is shared by GUI and non-GUI code); I don't know if that's correct, but it matches the "error messages in logs should be googleable in English" heuristic. I don't know whether there are things I should be doing to reduce translator effort (like minimizing the total number of distinct message strings I use, or something.)
* I don't really know how (if?) automated testing is applied to GUI code. I can make a list of PSBTs exercising all the codepaths for manual testing, if that's the right approach. Input appreciated.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
tested ACK 931dd47608
Sjors:
re-tACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
jb55:
ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
achow101:
ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
Tree-SHA512: ade52471a2242f839a8bd6a1fd231443cc4b43bb9c1de3fb5ace7c5eb59eca99b1f2e9f17dfdb4b08d84d91f5fd65677db1433dd03eef51c7774963ef4e2e74f
5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257 doc: release note for getpeerinfo last_block/last_transaction (Jon Atack)
cfef5a2c98b9563392a4a258fedb8bdc869c9749 test: rpc_net.py logging and test naming improvements (Jon Atack)
21c57bacda766a4f56ee75a2872f5d0f94e3901e test: getpeerinfo last_block and last_transaction tests (Jon Atack)
8a560a7d57cbd9f473d6a3782893a0e2243c55bd rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/TXTime as getpeerinfo last_block/transaction (Jon Atack)
02fbe3ae0bd91cbab2828cb7aa46f6493c82f026 net: add nLastBlockTime/TXTime to CNodeStats, CNode::copyStats (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR adds inbound peer eviction criteria `nLastBlockTime` and `nLastTXTime` to `CNodeStats` and `CNode::copyStats`, which then allows exposing them in the next commit as `last_transaction` and `last_block` Unix Epoch Time fields in RPC `getpeerinfo`.
This may be useful for writing missing eviction tests. I'd also like to add `lasttx` and `lastblk` columns to the `-netinfo` dashboard as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19643#issuecomment-671093420.
Relevant discussion at the p2p irc meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-08-11.html#l-549:
```text
<jonatack> i was specifically trying to observe and figure out how to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19500
<jonatack> which made me realise that i didn't know what was going on with my peer conns in enough detail
<jonatack> i'm running bitcoin locally with nLastBlockTime and nLastTXTime added to getpeerinfo for my peer connections dashboard
<jonatack> sipa: is there a good reason why that (eviction criteria) data is not exposed through getpeerinfo currently?
<sipa> jonatack: nope; i suspect just nobody ever added it
<jonatack> sipa: thanks. will propose.
```
The last commit is optional, but I think it would be good to have logging in `rpc_net.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
darosior:
ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
Tree-SHA512: 2db164bc979c014837a676e890869a128beb7cf40114853239e7280f57e768bcb43bff6c1ea76a61556212135281863b5290b50ff9d24fce16c5b89b55d4cd70
b6834e312a6a7bb395ec7266bc9469384639df96 Avoid 'timing mishap' warnings when mocking (Pieter Wuille)
ec3916f40a3fc644ecbbaaddef6258937c7fcfbc Use mockable time everywhere in net_processing (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The fact that net_processing uses a mix of mockable tand non-mockable time functions made it hard to write functional tests for #19988.
I'm opening this as a separate PR as I believe it's independently useful. In some ways this doesn't go quite as far as it could, as there are now several data structures that could be converted to `std::chrono` types as well now. I haven't done that here, but I'm happy to reconsider that.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK b6834e312a 🌶
jnewbery:
utACK b6834e312a6a7bb395ec7266bc9469384639df96
naumenkogs:
utACK b6834e3
Tree-SHA512: 6528a167c57926ca12894e0c476826411baf5de2f7b01c2125b97e5f710e620f427bbb13f72bdfc3de59072e56a9c1447bce832f41c725e00e81fea019518f0e
