BACKPORT NOTICE
It includes only this commit: 97a965d98f1582ea1b1377bd258c9088380e1b8b
refactor: extract descriptor ID calculation from spkm GetID()
This allows us to verify the descriptor ID on the descriptors
unit tests in different software versions without requiring to
use the entire DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan machinery.
Note:
The unit test changes are introduced after the bugfix commit
but this commit + the unit test commit can be cherry-picked
on top of the v25 branch to verify IDs correctness. IDs must
be the same for v25 and after the bugfix commit.
0f7dc893ea1776515173dcd0bfe6826e963c90f3 test: compare `/chaininfo` response with `getblockchaininfo` RPC (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
The `/chaininfo` REST endpoint gets its infos from `getblockchaininfo` RPC, so this PR adds an `assert_equal` (in `interface_rest`) to ensure both responses are the same. Obs: other endpoints do the same for their respective RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
Concept and Code Review ACK 0f7dc893ea1776515173dcd0bfe6826e963c90f3. Belts-and-spenders.
Tree-SHA512: 51cbcf988090272e406a47dc869710740b74e2222af29c05ddcbf53bd49765cdc59efb525e970867f091b3d2efec4fb13371a342d9e484e51144b760265bc5b8
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
47c48b5f35b4910fcf87caa6e37407e67d879c80 test: only use verbose for getrawmempool when necessary in functional tests (Michael Dietz)
77349713b189e80f2c140db4df50177353a1cb83 test: use getmempoolentry instead of getrawmempool in functional tests when appropriate (Michael Dietz)
86dbd54ae8a8f9c693c0ea67114bbff24a0754df test: improve mempool_updatefrom efficiency by using getmempoolentry for specific txns (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
I don't think this changes the intention of the test. But it does shave ~30 seconds off the time it takes to run. From what I've seen our CI `macOS 11 native [gui] [no depends]` runs `mempool_updatefrom.py` in ~135 seconds. After this PR it should run in ~105 seconds
I noticed this improvement should probably be made when testing performance/runtimes of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22698. But I wanted to separate this out from that PR so the affects of each is decoupled
Edit: The major change in this PR is improving mempool_updatefrom.py's runtime as this is a very long running test. Then made the same efficiency improvements across all the functional tests as it made since to do that here
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Tested ACK 47c48b5f35b4910fcf87caa6e37407e67d879c80
Tree-SHA512: 40f553715f3d4649dc18c2738554eafaca9ea800c4b028c099217896cc1c466ff457ae814d59cf8564c782a8964d8fac3eda60c1b6ffb08bbee1439b2d34434b
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
accf3d5868460b4b14ab607fd66ac985b086fbb3 [test] mempool package ancestor/descendant limits (glozow)
2b6b26e57c24d2f0abd442c1c33098e3121572ce [test] parameterizable fee for make_chain and create_child_with_parents (glozow)
313c09f7b7beddfdb74c284720d209c81dfdb94f [test] helper function to increase transaction weight (glozow)
f8253d69d6f02850995a11eeb71fedc22e6f6575 extract/rename helper functions from rpc_packages.py (glozow)
3cd663a5d33aa7ef87994e452bced7f192d021a0 [policy] ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
c6e016aa139c8363e9b38bbc1ba0dca55700b8a7 [mempool] check ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
f551841d3ec080a2d7a7988c7b35088dff6c5830 [refactor] pass size/count instead of entry to CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (glozow)
97dd1c729d2bbedf9527b914c0cc8267b8a7c21b MOVEONLY: add helper function for calculating ancestors and checking limits (glozow)
f95bbf58aaf72aab8a9c5827b1f162f3b8ac38f4 misc package validation doc improvements (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR implements a function to calculate mempool ancestors for a package and enforces ancestor/descendant limits on them as a whole. It reuses a portion of `CalculateMemPoolAncestors()`; there's also a small refactor to move the reused code into a generic helper function. Instead of calculating ancestors and descendants on every single transaction in the package and their ancestors, we use a "worst case" heuristic, treating every transaction in the package as each other's ancestor and descendant. This may overestimate everyone's counts, but is still pretty accurate in the our main package use cases, in which at least one of the transactions in the package is directly related to all the others (e.g. 1 parent + 1 child, multiple parents with 1 child, or chains).
Note on Terminology: While "package" is often used to describe groups of related transactions _within_ the mempool, here, I only use package to mean the group of not-in-mempool transactions we are currently validating.
#### Motivation
It would be a potential DoS vector to allow submission of packages to mempool without a proper guard for mempool ancestors/descendants. In general, the purpose of mempool ancestor/descendant limits is to limit the computational complexity of dealing with families during removals and additions. We want to be able to validate multiple transactions on top of the mempool, but also avoid these scenarios:
- We underestimate the ancestors/descendants during package validation and end up with extremely complex families in our mempool (potentially a DoS vector).
- We expend an unreasonable amount of resources calculating everyone's ancestors and descendants during package validation.
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
utACK accf3d5
ariard:
ACK accf3d5.
Tree-SHA512: 0d18ce4b77398fe872e0b7c2cc66d3aac2135e561b64029584339e1f4de2a6a16ebab3dd5784f376e119cbafc4d50168b28d3bd95d0b3d01158714ade2e3624d
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
dc59cbc315 fix: optimize includes in gsl/pointer.h to speed up compile time (Konstantin Akimov)
d5e32e1b79 fix: disable gsl iostream feature for faster compile time (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This header `gsl/pointers.h` is included in multiple other headers all over codebase.
Any extra line of code inside gsl/pointers.h makes all project to compile slower.
## What was done?
Removed headers `<algorithm>`, `<system_error>`, `<iosfwd>` from gsl/pointers.h
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run command 5 times, takes minimum time:
- baseline
```
$ time g++ -o /tmp/a.out gsl/pointers.h -O2 -g -I.
real 0m0,572s
user 0m0,461s
sys 0m0,108s
```
- removed algorithm:
```
$ time g++ -o /tmp/a.out gsl/pointers.h -O2 -g -I.
real 0m0,505s
user 0m0,398s
sys 0m0,107s
```
- removed algorithm and system_error:
```
real 0m0,332s
user 0m0,265s
sys 0m0,067s
```
- disabled iostream:
```
$ time g++ -o /tmp/a.out gsl/pointers.h -O2 -g -I. -D GSL_NO_IOSTREAMS
real 0m0,316s
user 0m0,256s
sys 0m0,060s
```
as a result, overall project compilation time is also improved: `make clean ; sleep 3s ; time make -j20`
```
real 5m42,934s
user 80m35,127s
sys 6m40,735s
```
```
real 5m28,862s
user 75m31,931s
sys 6m32,591s
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK dc59cbc315
Tree-SHA512: 353d79c0e297c92e823972b53daaaed42494554ce550ea800ce8aa6990c704cedfbcb922e1d735eb8fc01ad14ffa873d86cdbc4d3731d841496392bb74286d33
1f4e1a17ed test: add test for governance inv expiration (UdjinM6)
06b4dba0d3 feat: make CInv python implementation aware of governance invs (UdjinM6)
c7c930ece6 fix: use correct condition in logs (UdjinM6)
d41d87a5be fix: use `std::chrono::seconds` (UdjinM6)
d6fe7146ff chore: make clang-format and linter happy (UdjinM6)
b57a9220c1 refactor: sqash 2 hash maps into one, use proper naming (UdjinM6)
4116ba3253 fix: let internal govobj/vote inv request trackers expire after 60 sec (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Another issue noticed during recent sb voting period. Lots of inv are coming from peers that never send the object/vote they announced. Let's not wait for these forever, 60 seconds should be enough.
## What was done?
Add a "timer" to each request.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, run a MN on mainnet and check logs.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 1f4e1a17ed
Tree-SHA512: f5c5a896f61b5aed27c6f42c926254156c604edb4efd2a3cd3738a7e8d1ed7bafffadc584148e4a5c1a172c2b3d61a06884a1f6d56eb4ebe37a4b0dbc050edd6
87d775d27c partial bitcoin#22868: Call load handlers without cs_wallet locked (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c602ca15e1 coinjoin: protect `m_wallet_manager_map` with `cs_wallet_manager_map` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
This pull request aims to deal with regressions ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550859495)) spotted in `develop` after the merger of [dash#6143](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6143), namely, a failure to build the multiprocess variant and two data races, one involving `ChainstateManager::m_best_header` and another involving `CoinJoinWalletManager::m_wallet_manager_map`.
* Fixes for the build failure and the first data race (b136742f98c6792735232cc170123f849fd13bad and 9e7c6850139e69cb64cfe89813e6f0e4b1e626e1), have been spun off into [dash#6199](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6199) and merged
* The second data race is being avoided by protected `m_wallet_manager_map` with a new `RecursiveMutex`, `cs_wallet_manager_map` (the contents of this PR). ~~A version of these changes are available using a regular `Mutex` but prove far more cumbersome ([source](b89457dc9a)) when taking practicalities into account ([comment](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6192#discussion_r1713207664)).~~ A `Mutex` version is now available courtesy of UdjinM6 (see [patch](ecf5c1ba76)), thanks!
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
light-ACK 87d775d27c
Tree-SHA512: 52545a1547357a45fb6bf4d3948fc75a5e88f1d86e9809b1060007cd74dd383249691d8d9777f647c7534d458fe126ae818fa2b47f0e5b0cee78a469af1ed0c9
1973532372 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22337: wallet: Use bilingual_str for errors (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
bitcoin backport
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec638bde047788824961c230804461cee96ddcc0dbe1928bfb8c675c7f7f8c0c104850676a70fb8c9380401ead6d5986022ae3698a2bbc84f679531b11349580
d6d2ab984547be4a9f7ba859a2a4c9ac9bfbf206 test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce024b1c0ef2dcd307023aaaab40373c8bf17db1 test: MiniWallet: force P2PK signature to have fixed size (71 bytes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #21945. It aims to both fix the fee calculation for P2PK mode transactions and enable its vsize check. Currently, the latter assumes a fixed tx length, which is fine for anyone-can-spend txs but doesn't apply to P2PK output spends due to varying DER signature size; the vsize check is therefore disabled for P2PK mode on master branch.
Creating one million DER signatures with MiniWallet shows the following distribution of sizes (smart people with better math skills probably could deduce the ratios without trying, but hey):
| DER signature size [bytes] | #occurences (ratio) |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| 71 | 498893 (49.89%) |
| 70 | 497244 (49.72%) |
| 69 | 3837 (0.38%) |
| 68 | 22 (0.0022%) |
Note that even smaller signatures are possible (for smaller R and S values with leading zero bytes), it's just that the probability decreases exponentially. Instead of choosing a large vsize check range and hoping that smaller signatures are never created (potentially leading to flaky tests), the proposed solution is ~~to limit the signature size to the two most common sizes 71 and 70 (>99.6% probability) and then accordingly only check for two vsize values; the value to be used for fee calculation is a decimal right between the two possible sizes (167.5 vbytes) and for the vsize check it's rounded down/up integer values are used.~~ to simply grind the signature to a fixed size of 71 bytes (49.89% probability, i.e. on average each call to `sign_tx()`, on average two ECC signing operations are needed).
~~The idea of grinding signatures to a fixed size (similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666 which grinds to low-R values) would be counter-productive, as the signature creation in the test suite is quite expensive and this would significantly slow down tests that calculate hundreds of signatures (like e.g. feature_csv_activation.py).~~
For more about transaction sizes on different input/output types, see the following interesting article: https://medium.com/coinmonks/on-bitcoin-transaction-sizes-97e31bc9d816
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK d6d2ab984547be4a9f7ba859a2a4c9ac9bfbf206
Tree-SHA512: 011c70ee0e4adf9ba12902e4b6c411db9ae96bdd8bc810bf1d67713367998e28ea328394503371fc1f5087a819547ddaea56c073b28db893ae1c0031d7927f32
fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a test: Run pep-8 on touched test (MarcoFalke)
fab7e99c2a4b02a41b7448b45f0e6cdfdbb53ac3 test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
fab871f649e3da4a5a5f6cffac3fc748bb1ca900 test: Remove unused generate() from test (MarcoFalke)
faff3f35b778d9af3d649b303d7edab49bfe40b4 test: Add txin.sequence option to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This comes with nice benefits:
* Less code and complexity
* Test can be run without wallet compiled in
Also add some additional checks for `getmempoolentry` (#22209) and other cleanups 🎨
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Tested ACK fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a thanks for the explanations, nicely done
theStack:
ACK fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a 🍷
Tree-SHA512: 0e9b8fe985779d8d7034d256deed627125bb374b6ae2972c461b3a220739a51061c6147ad69339bee16282f82716c7f3f8a7a89c693ceb1e47ea50709272332a
01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7 test: doc: improve doc for chain_transaction() helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
6e63e366d609312ab984b4439de2d59bb618620b test: refactor: dedup utility function chain_transaction() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Both tests `mempool_packages.py` and `mempool_package_onemore.py` define a utility function `chain_transaction` with a similar implementation. This PR deduplicates it by moving it into the util package and keeping the more general properties:
* pass a list of parent_txids/vouts instead of single values
* always mark the BIP125-replaceable flag for txs, created via `createrawtransaction` (this is needed by the `mempool_package_onemore.py` test, but doesn't hurt the other one)
This is a low-hanging fruit; as a potential follow-up one could probably also deduplicate the function `chain_transaction` in `rpc_packages.py`, which looks a bit different, as it also takes the parent locking script into account and doesn't send the tx.
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
reACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7
klementtan:
Code review ACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7 🙅
Tree-SHA512: ac7105d02c23f53d76d4ec9dc8de1074dd8faefeecd44b107921b78665279498966152fed312ecbe252a1c34a9643d531166329a4fea0e773df3bb75d43092b0
493fb47c577b7564138c883a8f22cbac3619ce44 Make SetupServerArgs callable without NodeContext (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
`bitcoin-gui` code needs to call `SetupServerArgs` but will not have a `NodeContext` object if it is communicating with an external `bitcoin-node` process, so this just passes `ArgsManager` directly.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 493fb47c577b7564138c883a8f22cbac3619ce44
Tree-SHA512: 94cda4350113237976e32f1935e3602d1e6ea90c29c4434db2094be70dddf4b63702c3094385258bdf1c3e5b52c7d23bbc1f0282bdd4965557eedd5aef9a0fd4
a3f0cbf82ddae2dd83001a9cc3a7948dcfb6fa47 test: run mempool_reorg.py even with wallet disabled (Darius Parvin)
Pull request description:
Run mempool_reorg.py test even when the wallet is disabled, as discussed in #20078.
As part of this PR I created a new method in `MiniWallet`, `create_self_transfer`, to return a raw tx (without broadcasting it) and its associated utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a3f0cbf82ddae2dd83001a9cc3a7948dcfb6fa47
Tree-SHA512: 316a38faffadcb87499c1d6eca21e9696cef65362bbffcf621788a9b771bb1fa2971b1c7835cbd34b952d7612ad83afbca824cd8be39ecd6b994e8963027f991
92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c Change SignTransaction's input_errors to use bilingual_str (Andrew Chow)
171366e89b828a557f8262d9dc14ff7a03f813f7 Use bilingual_str for address fetching functions (Andrew Chow)
9571c69b51115454c6a699be9492024f7b46c2b4 Add bilingual_str::clear() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
In a couple of places in the wallet, errors are `std::string`. In order for these errors to be translated, change them to use `bilingual_str`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22337#pullrequestreview-694542729) review, verified with
klementtan:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf37995e65e68dfd6f129ecaf418e01c
Tree-SHA512: 5400e419dd87db8c49b67ed0964de2d44b58010a566ca246f2f0760ed9ef6a9b6f6df7a6adcb211b315b74c727bfe8c7d07eb5690b5922fa5828ceef4c83461f
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
88bf7a8cb4 fix: resolve GitHub workflow warnings (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.blog/changelog/2022-10-11-github-actions-deprecating-save-state-and-set-output-commands/
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Check results for CI and Guix actions (in future PRs? 🤷♂️ )
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 91464dbb85767e27bd26484cf597f7794e450d56901a407864ce9d3880fb15118047ee040f4e4ab19ea2a0a6dc8aaa6239353427f35f9c7500a6df0fdff6fb6f
5a1bef60a03b57de708a1a751bd90b8245fd8b83 test: refactor: remove binascii from test_framework (Zero-1729)
Pull request description:
This PR continues the work started in PR #22593, regarding using the `bytes` built-in module. In this PR specifically, instances of `binascii`'s methods `hexlify`, `unhexlify`, and `a2b_hex` have been replaced with the build-in `bytes` module's `hex` and `fromhex` methods where appropriate to make bytes <-> hex-string conversions consistent across the functional test files and test_framework.
Additionally, certain changes made are based on the following assumption:
```
bytes.hex(data) == binascii.hexlify(data).decode()
bytes.hex(data).encode() == binascii.hexlify(data)
```
Ran the functional tests to ensure behaviour is still consistent and changes didn't break existing tests.
closes#22605
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 5a1bef60a03b57de708a1a751bd90b8245fd8b83 🔢
Tree-SHA512: 8f28076cf0580a0d02a156f3e1e94c9badd3d41c3fbdfb2b87cd8a761dde2c94faa5f4c448d6747b1ccc9111c3ef1a1d7b42a11c806b241fa0410b7529e2445f
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
b65863783f merge bitcoin#27011: Add simulation-based `CCoinsViewCache` fuzzer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
1d0e410280 merge bitcoin#26999: A few follow-ups to bitcoin#17487 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7d837ea5c5 merge bitcoin#17487: allow write to disk without cache drop (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
2c758f4ba2 merge bitcoin#25571: Make mapBlocksUnknownParent local, and rename it (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
70a91e1d3f merge bitcoin#25349: CBlockIndex/CDiskBlockIndex improvements for safety, consistent behavior (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
eca0a64ea1 merge bitcoin#22564: Move mutable globals cleared in ::UnloadBlockIndex to BlockManager (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
916b3f0041 merge bitcoin#24917: Make BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex private (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e10ca27fa6 merge bitcoin#24299: UnloadBlockIndex and ChainstateManager::Reset thread safety cleanups (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
18aa55be1e merge bitcoin#24177: add missing thread safety lock assertions (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
678e67c505 merge bitcoin#24235: use stronger EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
edc665c80d merge bitcoin#24103: Replace RecursiveMutex m_cs_chainstate with Mutex, and rename it (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d19ffd613a merge bitcoin#22278: Add LIFETIMEBOUND to CScript where needed (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6097
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6067
* Test failures in `linux64_multiprocess-build` ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550924662)) and `linux64_tsan-test` ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550924666)) do not stem from this PR but are pre-existing failures in `develop` ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550859495), [build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550859499)). A fix for the build failures has been opened as a separate PR.
## Breaking Changes
None observed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
LGTM, utACK b65863783f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b65863783f
Tree-SHA512: 1a9c3a41617af274db169db47a9c9fce7ba7ce0b2d68aa75617640a55da11a0fa095cb25ce6a2d38f06d3f6a6cc4c08cb4cf82dca4bdc74192e8882fd5f7052f
