c1dde3a949b36ce9c2155777b3fa1372e7ed97d8 No longer shutdown after encrypting the wallet (Andrew Chow)
d7637c5a3f1d62922594cdfb6272e30dacf60ce9 After encrypting the wallet, reload the database environment (Andrew Chow)
5d296ac810755dc47f105eb95b52b7e2bcb8aea8 Add function to close all Db's and reload the databae environment (Andrew Chow)
a769461d5e37ddcb771ae836254fdc69177a28c4 Move BerkeleyEnvironment deletion from internal method to callsite (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This is the replacement for #11678 which implements @ryanofsky's [suggestion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11678#pullrequestreview-76464511).
Shutting down the software was to prevent the BDB environment from writing unencrypted private keys to disk in the database log files, as was noted [here](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51474.msg616068#msg616068). This PR replaces the shutdown behavior with a CDBEnv flush, close, and reopen which achieves the same effect: everything is cleanly flushed and closed, the log files are removed, and then the environment reopened to continue normal operation.
To ensure that no unencrypted private keys are in the log files after encrypting the wallet, I wrote [this script](https://gist.github.com/achow101/7f7143e6c3d3fdc034d3470e72823e9d) to pull private keys from the original wallet file and searches for these keys in the log files (note that you will have to change your file paths to make it work on your own machine).
As for concerns about private keys being written to slack space or being kept in memory, these behaviors no longer exist after the original wallet encryption PR and the shutting down solution from 2011.
cc @ryanofsky
Tree-SHA512: 34b894283b0677a873d06dee46dff8424dec85a2973009ac9b84bcf3d22d05f227c494168c395219d9aee3178e420cf70d4b3eeacc9785aa86b6015d25758e75
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention
5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.
Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80
* update violation count
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests
6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:
tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
tests for mining features are named mining_...
tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...
Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.
Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16
* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
* ci: Fix excluded test names
* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
Wladimir J. van der Laan