Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konstantin Akimov
b8b37f314b Merge #17891: scripted-diff: Replace CCriticalSection with RecursiveMutex
e09c701e0110350f78366fb837308c086b6503c0 scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2020 (MarcoFalke)
6cbe6209646db8914b87bf6edbc18c6031a16f1e scripted-diff: Replace CCriticalSection with RecursiveMutex (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  `RecursiveMutex` better clarifies that the mutex is recursive, see also the standard library naming: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/recursive_mutex

  For that reason, and to avoid different people asking me the same question repeatedly (e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15932#pullrequestreview-339175124 ), remove the outdated alias `CCriticalSection` with a scripted-diff
2023-05-24 12:43:57 -05:00
fanquake
25bdc2670e Merge #19982: test: Fix inconsistent lock order in wallet_tests/CreateWallet
e1e68b6305beb47ebf7ee48f14e12fdebdfea1ef test: Fix inconsistent lock order in wallet_tests/CreateWallet (Hennadii Stepanov)
cb23fe01c125e1820f3c37348e06d98c93e6aec2 sync: Check precondition in LEAVE_CRITICAL_SECTION() macro (Hennadii Stepanov)
c5e3e74f70c29ac8852903ef425f5f327d5da969 sync: Improve CheckLastCritical() (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR:
  - fixes #19049 that was caused by #16426
  - removes `wallet_tests::CreateWallet` suppression from the `test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan`

  The example of the improved `CheckLastCritical()`/`LEAVE_CRITICAL_SECTION()` log (could be got when compiled without the last commit):
  ```
  2020-09-20T08:34:28.429485Z [test] INCONSISTENT LOCK ORDER DETECTED
  2020-09-20T08:34:28.429493Z [test] Current lock order (least recent first) is:
  2020-09-20T08:34:28.429501Z [test]  'walletInstance->cs_wallet' in wallet/wallet.cpp:4007 (in thread 'test')
  2020-09-20T08:34:28.429508Z [test]  'cs_wallets' in wallet/wallet.cpp:4089 (in thread 'test')
  ```

  Currently, there are other "naked" `LEAVE_CRITICAL_SECTION()` in the code base:
  b99a1633b2/src/rpc/mining.cpp (L698)

  b99a1633b2/src/checkqueue.h (L208)

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK e1e68b6305beb47ebf7ee48f14e12fdebdfea1ef 💂
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK e1e68b6305beb47ebf7ee48f14e12fdebdfea1ef. Just trivial rebase and suggested switch to BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION since last review
  vasild:
    ACK e1e68b630

Tree-SHA512: a627680eac3af4b4c02772473d68322ce8d3811bf6b035d3485ccc97d35755bef933cffabd3f20b126f89e3301eccecec3f769df34415fb7c426c967b6ce36e6
2023-03-19 11:08:31 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
e36ee01f99 merge bitcoin#17384: Create new test library 2022-02-26 10:45:13 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
ad203019f9 merge bitcoin#15788: Unify testing setups for fuzz, bench, and unit tests 2021-10-25 21:28:37 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
2b48a6d6a2
merge bitcoin#19353: Fix mistakenly swapped "previous" and "current" lock orders 2021-10-13 12:42:48 -04:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
790a4f9d60
merge bitcoin#19340: Preserve the LockData initial state if "potential deadlock detected" exception thrown 2021-10-12 19:48:19 -04:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
944aea8753 merge #11599: Small locking rename 2021-06-06 16:22:17 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
c5c3dee308 merge #11640: Make LOCK, LOCK2, TRY_LOCK work with CWaitableCriticalSection 2021-06-06 16:22:17 +05:30