Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konstantin Akimov
f34889dcf4
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology
d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery)
5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery)
85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery)
9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize:

  - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces.
  - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'.

  For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references.

ACKs for top commit:
  amitiuttarwar:
    ACK d5800da519
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞
Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-20 00:07:10 +07:00
fanquake
9d33b30a87
Merge #19674: refactor: test: use throwaway _ variable for unused loop counters
dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase.

  The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used.

  Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked.

ACKs for top commit:
  darosior:
    ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
  instagibbs:
    manual inspection ACK dac7a111bd
  practicalswift:
    ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :)

Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
2024-01-20 00:07:09 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
4aa197dbdb Merge #18673: scripted-diff: Sort test includes
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.

  This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.

  Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.

  Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
  jonatack:
    ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build

Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
2023-08-29 22:00:59 -05:00
fanquake
707ce41493 Merge #19206: test: Remove leftover comment in mining_basic
fa98e10d5efcd965ee224ec21c9e79ebb123f055 test: Remove leftover comment in mining_basic (MarcoFalke)
faedb50d89cf113084adfa50c280c295c95571a8 test: pep-8 mining_basic (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Remove an accidental leftover comment from #19082, which no longer applies and thus might be confusing

ACKs for top commit:
  adamjonas:
    code review ACK fa98e10

Tree-SHA512: c7f7f8f579b3c6e92f45769be0a7af1a421438a3f5524db5278b2269511a9e0e08f44e3836afb26727644035897ee51ff8296d13ce23030549e7403f57b40e40
2023-02-27 23:12:41 -06:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
ef55afa7db Merge #19082: test: Moved the CScriptNum asserts into the unit test in script.py
7daffc6a90a797ce7c365a893a31a31b0206985c [test] CScriptNum Decode Check as Unit Tests (Gillian Chu)

Pull request description:

  The CScriptNum test (#14816) is a roundtrip test of the test framework. Thus, it would be better suited as a unit test. This is now possible with the introduction of the unit test module for the functional tests. See #18576.

  This PR:
  1. Refactors the CScriptNum tests into 2 unit tests, one in script.py and one in blocktools.py.
  2. Extends the script.py CScriptNum test to trial larger numbers.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK 7daffc6a90a797ce7c365a893a31a31b0206985c

Tree-SHA512: 17a04a4bfff1b1817bfc167824c679455d9e06e6e0164c00a7e44f8aa5041c5f5080adcc1452fd80ba1a6d8409f976c982bc481d686c434edf97a5893a32a436
2023-02-27 23:12:41 -06:00
MarcoFalke
d15c58f1df Merge #15238: [QA] remove some magic mining constants in functional tests
b651ef7e1c submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741745 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  The fewer magic numbers the better.

  Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.

Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
2023-02-10 23:34:57 +03:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
e8bf39f2dc merge bitcoin#19967: Replace (dis)?connect_nodes globals with TestFramework methods
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-17 08:03:12 +05:30
MarcoFalke
6dbc9aba0d Merge #17675: tests: Enable tests which are incorrectly skipped when running test_runner.py --usecli
5ac804a9eb0cdbdcff8b50ecfb736f8793cab805 tests: Use a default of supports_cli=True (instead of supports_cli=False) (practicalswift)
993e38a4e2fa66093314b988dfbe459f46aa5864 tests: Mark functional tests not supporting bitcoin-cli (--usecli) as such (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Annotate functional tests supporting `bitcoin-cli` (`--usecli`) as such.

  Prior to this commit 74 tests were unnecessarily skipped when running `test_runner.py --usecli`.

  Before [bitcoin original commit stats]:

  ```
  $ test/functional/test_runner.py --usecli > /dev/null 2>&1
  $ echo $?
  0
  $ test/functional/test_runner.py --usecli 2>&1 | cut -f2 -d'|' | \
      grep -E ' (Passed|Skipped) *$' | sort | uniq -c
        9  ✓ Passed
      126  ○ Skipped
  ```

  After [dash numbers]:

  ```
  $ test/functional/test_runner.py --usecli > /dev/null 2>&1
  $ echo $?
  0
  $ test/functional/test_runner.py --usecli 2>&1 | cut -f2 -d'|' | \
      grep -E ' (Passed|Skipped) *$' | sort | uniq -c
       110  ✓ Passed
       51  ○ Skipped
  ```

  Context: `--usecli` was introduced in f6ade9ce1a

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 5ac804a9eb0cdbdcff8b50ecfb736f8793cab805

Tree-SHA512: 249c0b691a74cf201c729df86c3db2b3faefa53b94703941e566943d252c6d14924e935a8da4f592951574235923fbb7cd22612a5e7e02ff6c762c55a2320ca3
2022-06-08 12:35:12 +07:00
MarcoFalke
525c12e60f Merge #15383: [rpc] mining: Omit uninitialized currentblockweight, currentblocktx
fa178a6385 [rpc] mining: Omit uninitialized currentblockweight, currentblocktx (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Previously we'd report "0", which could be mistaken for a valid number. E.g. the number of transactions is 0 or the block weight is 0, whatever that means.

Tree-SHA512: ee94ab203a329e272211b726f4c23edec4b09c650ec363b77fd59ad9264165d73064f78ebb9e11b5c2c543b73c157752410a307655560531c7d5444d203aa0ea
2022-02-27 13:33:36 -05:00
MarcoFalke
0bb0d89cb3 Merge #14236: qa: generate --> generatetoaddress change to allow tests run without wallet
0ca4c8b3c6 Changed functional tests which do not require wallets to run without (sanket1729)

Pull request description:

  Addresses #14216 . Changed Changed `get_deterministic_priv_key()` to return named tuple`(address, key)`
  I have tried to be exhaustive as possible in maximum coverage for non-wallet mode without affecting any coverage for wallet mode.

  However, I could not check the tests in wallet mode because of timeout issues. Hopefully, travis job checks those.

  Tests `feature_block.py`, `feature_logging.py` and `feature_reindex.py` were skipping despite having no direct dependency on any wallet functions. So, I have also disabled the `skip_test_no_wallet()` for those files too.

Tree-SHA512: 8f84bd8400a732d4266c7518d5cbcf1eb761f623a64a74849e0470142c8ef22cb75364474ddae75d9213c3d16659a52917b5ed979a313695da6abd16c4fd7445
2021-09-21 17:27:11 -04:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
71b4cf307b Merge #14180: qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled
fac95398366f644911b58f1605e6bc37fb76782d qa: Run all tests even if wallet is not compiled (MarcoFalke)
faa669cbcd1fc799517b523b0f850e01b11bf40a qa: Premine to deterministic address with -disablewallet (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Currently the test_runner would exit if the wallet was not compiled into the Bitcoin Core executable. However, a lot of the tests run without the wallet just fine and there is no need to globally require the wallet to run the tests.

Tree-SHA512: 63177260aa29126fd20f0be217a82b10b62288ab846f96f1cbcc3bd2c52702437703475d91eae3f8d821a3149fc62b725a4c5b2a7b3657b67ffcbc81532a03bb
2021-09-21 17:24:56 -04:00
Dzutte
f8ecee7e6f
Merge #13983: rpc: Return more specific reject reason for submitblock (#4408)
fa6ab8ada1 rpc: Return more specific reject reason for submitblock (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  The second commit in #13439 made the `TODO` in the first commit impossible to solve.

  The meaning of `fNewBlock` changed from "This is the first time we process this block" to "We are about to write the new *valid* block".

  So whenever `fNewBlock` is true, the block was valid. And whenever the `fNewBlock` is false, the block is either valid or invalid. If it was valid and not new, we know it is a `"duplicate"`. In all other cases, the `BIP22ValidationResult()` will return the reason why it is invalid.

Tree-SHA512: 4b6edf7a912339c3acb0fccfabbdd6d812a0321fb1639c244c2714e58dc119aa2b8c6bf8f7d61ea609a1b861bbc23f920370fcf989c48452721e259a8ce93d24

Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
2021-09-11 15:54:52 -04:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
0b13db2ac5 merge #14954: Require python 3.5 2021-08-31 11:16:12 +05:30
Wladimir J. van der Laan
2d5a90f3b5 Merge #14816: Add CScriptNum decode python implementation in functional suite
2012d4df2 Add CScriptNum decode python implementation in functional suite (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  I needed this for reasons and thought it'd be good to upsteam it.

Tree-SHA512: 6ea89fa2a5f5a7759ba722f2b4ed5cd6423ebfff4e83ac8b8b5c935e6aa479684e626c5f41fa020816d2a9079a99af5564e30808594d5c13e3b51ec9b474926d
2021-08-15 11:08:08 -04:00
PastaPastaPasta
a9bfde558a
Merge pull request #4313 from Munkybooty/backports-0.18-pr12
Backports 0.18 pr12
2021-08-11 11:11:35 -05:00
MarcoFalke
0fd490ff28 Merge #14720: rpc: Correctly name arguments
fa0815c300 rpc: Correctly name arguments (Jon Layton)

Pull request description:

  Consistently use the same name to describe arguments in the documentation and add a test that uses the name.

  By splitting it up, the changes are easier to potentially backport and also make review easier when we switch to `RPCHelpMan`.

  The tests should pass with or without the changes in `src`.

  Partly stolen from #14459 (More RPC help description fixes by ch4ot1c)

Tree-SHA512: 1072992b1e93ac41006613523e54a0a8004f529fcb101eb9d74d91474abb0945a5a7539f249905151b904b87448f9efc0cacbd9e052fbe2ea9111e62f3e7249c
2021-08-10 20:24:28 -04:00
Stefan
97b3ad18af
Merge bitcoin#13399: rpc: Add submitheader (#4326)
* Merge bitcoin#13399: rpc: Add submitheader

fa091b001605c4481fb4eca415929a98d3478549 qa: Add tests for submitheader (MarcoFalke)
36b1b63f20cc718084971d2cadd04497a9b72634 rpc: Expose ProcessNewBlockHeaders (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This exposes `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` as an rpc called `submitheader`.
This can be used to check for invalid block headers and submission of
valid block headers via the rpc.

Tree-SHA512:
a61e850470f15465f88e450609116df0a98d5d9afadf36b2033d820933d8b6a4012f9f2b3246319c08a0e511bef517f5d808cd0f44ffca91d10895a938004f0b

* Update test/functional/mining_basic.py

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-08-10 22:37:50 +03:00
MarcoFalke
9f4f52ae4e
Merge #13054: tests: Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports.
68400d8b96 tests: Use explicit imports (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Enable automatic detection of undefined names in Python tests scripts. Remove wildcard imports.

  Wildcard imports make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools.

  An additional benefit of not using wildcard imports in tests scripts is that readers of a test script then can infer the rough testing scope just by looking at the imports.

  Before this commit:

  ```
  $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:8:1: F403 'from test_framework.util import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:9:1: F403 'from test_framework.script import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:10:1: F403 'from test_framework.mininode import *' used; unable to detect undefined names
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:15:12: F405 bytes_to_hex_str may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:17:58: F405 CScript may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:25:13: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:31: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:26:60: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:41: F405 satoshi_round may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  ./test/functional/feature_rbf.py:30:68: F405 COIN may be undefined, or defined from star imports: test_framework.mininode, test_framework.script, test_framework.util
  $
  ```

  After this commit:

  ```
  $ contrib/devtools/lint-python.sh | head -10
  $
  ```

Tree-SHA512: 3f826d39cffb6438388e5efcb20a9622ff8238247e882d68f7b38609877421b2a8e10e9229575f8eb6a8fa42dec4256986692e92922c86171f750a0e887438d9
2021-07-06 20:29:33 +03:00
Kolby Moroz Liebl
e197f976e1
backport bitcoin#16509 and add devnet test (#3946)
* Merge #16509: test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest"

faf36838bdba7393960fce6ad0c56dc1f93f5870 test: Avoid hardcoding the chain name in combine_logs (MarcoFalke)
fa8a1d7ba30040f8c74f93fc41a61276c255a6a6 test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest" (MarcoFalke)
68f546635d5de2ccfedadeabc7bc79e12e5eca6a test: Fix “local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used” (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  This is required for various work in progress:

  * testchains #8994
  * signet #16411
  * some of my locally written tests

  While it will be unused in the master branch as of now, it will make all of those pull requests shorter. Thus review for non-regtest tests can focus on the actual changes and not some test framework changes.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK faf36838bdba7393960fce6ad0c56dc1f93f5870, ran tests and reviewed the code.

Tree-SHA512: 35add66c12cab68f2fac8f7c7d47c604d3f24eae9336ff78f83e2c92b3dc08a25e7f4217199bac5393dd3fb72f945bba9c001d6fbb8efd298c88858075fcb3d6

* Add devnet support for tests

* test: make sure devnet can connect to each other and start

* Partial merge bitcoin/bitcoin#16681: Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests, revert one TODO while at it

Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
2021-01-22 09:58:07 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
b07a7b810c
Backport 11796 + 11774 (#3612)
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention

5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.

Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80

* update violation count

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests

6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:

      tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
      tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
      tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
      tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
      tests for mining features are named mining_...
      tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
      tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...

  Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.

Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16

* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py

Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci: Fix excluded test names

* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
2020-07-17 02:44:20 +03:00