b9a46f6d2c refactor: use IsPlatformTransfer in core_write and rpc/blockchain (Konstantin Akimov)
f6169fade4 fix: make composite rpc 'masternode payments' to work with withdrawals (Konstantin Akimov)
e498378eb7 feat: add test for fee in getmempoolentry (Konstantin Akimov)
b0d06f0b5f feat: add regression test for `getblock` and `getblockstats` for withdrawal fee calculation failure (Konstantin Akimov)
ab7172bc8f fix: getblockstats rpc to work with withdrawal transactions (Konstantin Akimov)
96c9b469ca fix: getblock for withdrawal transaction if verbosity level is 2 (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/6335
## What was done?
Applied fixes for `getblock` rpc and `getblockstats` rpc to make them work with withdrawal transactions (asset unlock).
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run updated functional test `feature_asset_locks.py` without the fix causes a failure:
```
2024-10-22T12:01:35.902000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/knst/projects/dash-reviews/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 160, in main
self.run_test()
File "/home/knst/projects/dash-reviews/test/functional/feature_asset_locks.py", line 273, in run_test
self.test_asset_unlocks(node_wallet, node, pubkey)
File "/home/knst/projects/dash-reviews/test/functional/feature_asset_locks.py", line 410, in test_asset_unlocks
self.log.info(f"block info: {node.getblock(block_asset_unlock, 2)}")
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/knst/projects/dash-reviews/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 49, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/knst/projects/dash-reviews/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 148, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Internal bug detected: "MoneyRange(fee)"
core_write.cpp:338 (TxToUniv)
Please report this issue here: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues
(-1)
```
With patch functional test `feature_asset_locks.py` succeed.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b9a46f6d2c
kwvg:
utACK b9a46f6d2c
UdjinM6:
utACK b9a46f6d2c
ogabrielides:
utACK b9a46f6d2c
Tree-SHA512: e49cf73bff5fabc9463ae538c6c556d02b3f9e396e0353f5ea0661afa015259409cdada406d05b77bf0414761c76a013cd428ffc283cbdefbefe3384c9d6ccc5
21f174aff1 feat: improve query categorisation in Qt App (Konstantin Akimov)
c863473286 test: add spending asset unlock tx in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
1fb67ece0e feat: make a support of Qt app to show Platform Transfer transaction as a new type of transaction (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Transfers from platform have incorrectly shown amount in Dash Core wallet app.
They also shown in Qt app as self-send that is not completely true.
## What was done?
Added new type of transaction to Qt App, added a filter for its type, fixed calculation of output for tx records.
As well added a new type of transaction `platform-transfer` in rpc output of `gettransaction` RPC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Make a Platform Transfer transaction on RegTest and check it in Dash Core
Helper to see it: export dpath=/tmp/dash_func_test_PATHPATH/ ; src/qt/dash-qt -regtest -conf=$dpath/node0/dash.conf -datadir=$dpath/node0/ -debug=0 -debuglogfile=/dev/stdout
## Breaking Changes
There's new type of transaction "platform-transfer" in rpc output of `gettransaction`.
**This PR DOES NOT change any consensus rules.**
Breaking changes that makes withdrawal transaction immature is moved to https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6128
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec2a54a910f121ad30ff8e94cf17080b5b3c651872e9bc3de9ec0924ca7f7a0e526b74b05cde26aaf860e3809e67f66142112319a69c216527e5bcb1b8a2b8f6
9876c2d78b docs: add partial release notes (UdjinM6)
b330318db7 refactor: drop circular dependency (UdjinM6)
e54fe42ce8 refactor: use `key_to_p2pkh_script` in more places (UdjinM6)
3ed6246889 test: check `creditOutputs` format (UdjinM6)
ba0e64505b fix: `creditOutputs` in AssetLock tx json output should be an array of objects, not debug strings (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Txout-s in `creditOutputs` for AssetLock txes should be shown the way txout-s are shown in other places. We should not be using debug strings there.
Example: `getrawtransaction 50757f651f335e22c5a810bd05c1e5aac0d95b132f6454e2a72683f88e3983f3 1`
develop:
```
"assetLockTx": {
"version": 1,
"creditOutputs": [
"CTxOut(nValue=0.01000000, scriptPubKey=76a914cdfca4ae1cf2333056659a2c)"
]
},
```
This PR:
```
"assetLockTx": {
"version": 1,
"creditOutputs": [
{
"value": 0.01000000,
"valueSat": 1000000,
"scriptPubKey": {
"asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 cdfca4ae1cf2333056659a2c8dc656f36d228402 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex": "76a914cdfca4ae1cf2333056659a2c8dc656f36d22840288ac",
"address": "yf6c2VSpWGXUgmjQSHRpfEcTPsbqN4oL4c",
"type": "pubkeyhash"
}
}
]
},
```
kudos to @coolaj86 for finding the issue
## What was done?
Change `CAssetLockPayload::ToJson()` output to be closer to [`TxToUniv()`](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/src/core_write.cpp#L262-L272)
NOTE: `refactor: use key_to_p2pkh_script in more places` commit is a bit unrelated but I decided to add it anyway to make it easier to follow assetlock creation vs getrawtransaction rpc check.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Try example above, run tests
## Breaking Changes
RPC output is different for AssetLock txes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 9876c2d78b
Tree-SHA512: 158c98ac9e4979bb29c4f54cb1b71806f22aaec92218d92cd2b2e9b9f74df721563e7a6c5f517ea358ac74659fa79f51d1b683002a1cdceb1b8ee80f8fd79375
715bc1af66 test: check `masternode winners` before and after mn_rr (UdjinM6)
9d47cd2226 fix: adjust payee predictions after mn_rr activation (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Payment predictions in GUI are wrong when mn_rr is active, `masternode winners` RPC is affected by the same issue too. Actual payments aren't affected.
## What was done?
Adjust calculations, add tests for `masternode winners`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run dash-qt on testnet, check "Next Payment" on "Masternode" tab. Run tests.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 715bc1a
Tree-SHA512: 293c77974bcb50c6f9c51449d7bb12f89ad8db5871cad3a6083fe1951fe77e0deba8de7688b2f600fabe977bdc7390a66a984a6a076be19183c23742e00e27bf
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
69c37f4ec2 rpc: make sure `upgradetohd` always has the passphrase for `UpgradeToHD` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
619b640a77 wallet: unify HD chain generation in CWallet (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
163d31861c wallet: unify HD chain generation in LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
When filming demo footage for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6093, I realized that if I tried to create an encrypted blank legacy wallet and run `upgradetohd [mnemonic]`, the client would crash.
```
dash@b9c6631a824d:/src/dash$ ./src/qt/dash-qt
QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-dash'
dash-qt: wallet/scriptpubkeyman.cpp:399: void LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::GenerateNewCryptedHDChain(const SecureString &, const SecureString &, CKeyingMaterial): Assertion `res' failed.
Posix Signal: Aborted
No debug information available for stacktrace. You should add debug information and then run:
dash-qt -printcrashinfo=bvcgc43iinzgc43ijfxgm3ybaadwiyltnawxc5avkbxxg2lyebjwsz3omfwduicbmjxxe5dfmqaaa===
```
The expected set of operations when performing privileged operations is to first use `walletpassphrase [passphrase] [time]` to unlock the wallet and then perform the privileged operation. This routine that applies for almost all privileged RPCs doesn't apply here, the unlock state of the wallet has no bearing on constructing an encrypted HD chain as it needs to be encrypted with the master key stored in the wallet, which in turn is encrypted with a key derived from the passphrase (i.e., `upgradetohd` imports **always** need the passphrase, if encrypted).
You might have noticed that I used `upgradetohd [mnemonic]` instead of the correct syntax, `upgradetohd [mnemonic] "" [passphrase]` that is supposed to be used when supplying a mnemonic to an encrypted wallet, because when you run the former, you don't get told to enter the passphrase into the RPC command, you're told.
```
Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.
```
Which tells you to treat it like any other routine privileged operation and follow the routine as mentioned above. This is where insufficient validation starts rearing its head, we only validate the passphrase if we're supplied one even though we should be demanding one if the wallet is encrypted and it isn't supplied. We didn't supply a passphrase because we're following the normal routine, we unlocked the wallet so `EnsureWalletIsUnlocked()` is happy, so now the following happens.
```
upgradetohd()
| Insufficient validation has allowed us to supply a blank passphrase
| for an encrypted wallet
|- CWallet::UpgradeToHD()
|- CWallet::GenerateNewHDChainEncrypted()
| We get our hands on vMasterKey by generating the key from our passphrase
| and using it to unlock vCryptedMasterKey.
|
| There's one small problem, we don't know if the output of CCrypter::Decrypt
| isn't just gibberish. Since we don't have a passphrase, whatever came from
| CCrypter::SetKeyFromPassphrase isn't the decryption key, meaning, the
| vMasterKey we just got is gibberish
|- LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::GenerateNewCryptedHDChain()
|- res = LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::EncryptHDChain()
| |- EncryptSecret()
| |- CCrypter::SetKey()
| This is where everything unravels, the gibberish key's size doesn't
| match WALLET_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE, it's no good for encryption. We bail out.
|- assert(res)
We assume are inputs are safe so there's no real reason we should crash.
Except our inputs aren't safe, so we crash. Welp! :c
```
This problem has existed for a while but didn't cause the client to crash, in v20.1.1 (19512988c6), trying to do the same thing would return you a vague error
```
Failed to generate encrypted HD wallet (code -4)
```
In the process of working on mitigating this crash, another edge case was discovered, where if the wallet was unlocked and an incorrect passphrase was provided to `upgradetohd`, the user would not receive any feedback that they entered the wrong passphrase and the client would similarly crash.
```
upgradetohd()
| We've been supplied a passphrase, so we can try and validate it by
| trying to unlock the wallet with it. If it fails, we know we got the
| wrong passphrase.
|- CWallet::Unlock()
| | Before we bother unlocking the wallet, we should check if we're
| | already unlocked, if we are, we can just say "unlock successful".
| |- CWallet::IsLocked()
| | Wallet is indeed unlocked.
| |- return true;
| The validation method we just tried to use has a bail-out mechanism
| that we don't account for, the "unlock" succeded so I guess we have the
| right passphrase.
[...] (continue call chain as mentioned earlier)
|- assert(res)
Oh...
```
This pull request aims to resolve crashes caused by the above two edge cases.
## Additional Information
As this PR was required me to add additional guardrails on `GenerateNewCryptedHDChain()` and `GenerateNewHDChainEncrypted()`, it was taken as an opportunity to resolve a TODO ([source](9456d0761d/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L5028-L5038))). The following mitigations have been implemented.
* Validating `vMasterKey` size (any key not of `WALLET_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE` size cannot be used for encryption and so, cannot be a valid key)
* Validating `secureWalletPassphrase`'s presence to catch attempts at passing a blank value (an encrypted wallet cannot have a blank passphrase)
* Using `Unlock()` to validate the correctness of `vMasterKey`. (the two other instances of iterating through `mapMasterKeys` use `Unlock()`, see [here](1394c41c8d/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L5498-L5500)) and [here](1394c41c8d/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L429-L431)))
* `Lock()`'ing the wallet before `Unlock()`'ing the wallet to avoid the `IsLocked()` bail-out condition and then restoring to the previous lock state afterwards.
* Add an `IsCrypted()` check to see if `upgradetohd`'s `walletpassphrase` is allowed to be empty.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 69c37f4ec2
UdjinM6:
utACK 69c37f4ec2
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 69c37f4ec2
Tree-SHA512: 4bda1f7155511447d6672bbaa22b909f5e2fc7efd1fd8ae1c61e0cdbbf3f6c28f6e8c1a8fe2a270fdedff7279322c93bf0f8e01890aff556fb17288ef6907b3e
2db69d7b81 chore: add release notes for "quorum platformsign" (Konstantin Akimov)
283c5f89a2 feat: create new composite command "quorum platformsign" (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It splits from #6100
With just whitelist it is impossible to limit the RPC `quorum sign` to use only one specific quorum type, this PR aim to provide ability for quorum signing for platform quorum only.
## What was done?
Implemented a new composite command "quorum platformsign"
This composite command let to limit quorum type for signing for case of whitelist.
After that old way to limit platform commands can be deprecated - #6105
## How Has This Been Tested?
Updated a functional tests to use platform signing for Asset Unlocks feature.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 2db69d7b81
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 2db69d7b81
Tree-SHA512: b0dff9934137c4faa85664058e1e77f85067cc8d931e6d76ee5b9e610164ac8b0609736d5f09475256cb78d65bf92466624d784f0b13d20136df7e75613662cb
85abbb97b4 chore: add release notes for composite command for whitelist (Konstantin Akimov)
78ad778bb0 feat: test composite commands in functional test for whitelist (Konstantin Akimov)
a102a59787 feat: add support of composite commands in RPC'c whitelists (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/66https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/65
## What was done?
Our composite commands such as "quorum list" have been refactored to make them truly compatible with other features, such as whitelist, see https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6052https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6051https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6055 and other related PRs
This PR makes whitelist feature to be compatible with composite commands.
Instead implementing additional users such "dapi" better to provide universal way which do not require new build for every new API that has been used by platform, let's simplify things.
Platform at their side can use config such as this one (created based on shumkov's example):
```
rpc: {
host: '127.0.0.1',
port: 9998,
users: [
{
user: 'dashmate',
password: 'rpcpassword',
whitelist: null,
lowPriority: false,
},
{
username: 'platform-dapi',
password: 'rpcpassword',
whitelist: [],
lowPriority: true,
},
{
username: 'platform-drive-consensus',
password: 'rpcpassword',
whitelist: [getbestchainlock,getblockchaininfo,getrawtransaction,submitchainlock,verifychainlock,protx_listdiff,quorum_listextended,quorum_info,getassetunlockstatuses,sendrawtransaction,mnsync_status]
lowPriority: false,
},
{
username: 'platform-drive-other',
password: 'rpcpassword',
whitelist: [getbestchainlock,getblockchaininfo,getrawtransaction,submitchainlock,verifychainlock,protx_listdiff,quorum_listextended,quorum_info,getassetunlockstatuses,sendrawtransaction,mnsync_status]
],
lowPriority: true,
},
],
allowIps: ['127.0.0.1', '172.16.0.0/12', '192.168.0.0/16'],
},
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Updated functional tests, see commits
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
LGTM, utACK 85abbb97b4
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 85abbb97b4
Tree-SHA512: 88608179c347420269880c352cf9f3b46272f3fc62e8e7158042e53ad69dc460d5210a1f89e1e09081d090250c87fcececade88e2ddec09f73f1175836d7867b
0133c9866d feat: add functional test for submitchainlock far ahead in future (Konstantin Akimov)
6004e06769 feat: return enum in RecoveredSig verifying code, apply for RPC submitchainlock (Konstantin Akimov)
130b6d1e96 refactor: replace static private member method to static method (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently by result of `submitchainlock` impossible to distinct a situation when a signature is invalid and when a core is far behind and just doesn't know about signing quorum yet.
This PR aims to fix this issue, as requested by shumkov for needs of platform:
> mailformed signature and can’t verify signature due to unknown quorum is the same error?
> possible to distingush ?
## What was done?
Return enum in CL verifying code `chainlock_handler.VerifyChainLock`.
The RPC `submitchainlock` now returns error with code=-1 and message `no quorum found. Current tip height: {N} hash: {HASH}`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Functional test `feature_llmq_chainlocks.py` is updated
## Breaking Changes
`submitchainlock` return one more error code - not really a breaking change though, because v21 hasn't released yet.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 0133c9866d
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0133c9866d
Tree-SHA512: 794ba410efa57aaa66c47a67914deed97c1d060326e5d11a722c9233a8447f5e9215aa4a5ca401cb2199b8fc445144b2b2a692fc35494bf3296a74e9e115bda7
a42e9df06f fix: createwallet to require 'load_on_startup' for descriptor wallets (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC `createwallet` has changed list of arguments: `createwallet "wallet_name" ( disable_private_keys blank "passphrase" avoid_reuse descriptors load_on_startup )` since https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5965
`load_on_startup` used to be an argument 5 but now it has a number 6. Both arguments 5 and 6 are boolean and it can confuse an user: they may even not notice that something wrong when it meant to be "load on startup" but got "descriptor wallet" which is not expected.
See also previous attempt to resolve issue: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6029
## What was done?
To prevent confusion if user is not aware about this breaking changes, the RPC createwallet throws an exception if user trying to create descriptor wallet but has not mentioned load_on_startup. This requirement can be removed when major amount of users updated to v21.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
Tested with CLI:
```
$ createwallet "tmp-create" true true "" false true
RPC createwallet would not accept creating descriptor wallets without specifying 'load_on_startup' flag. It is required explicitly in v21 due to breaking changes in createwallet RPC (code -8)
$ createwallet "tmp-create" true true "" false true true
{
"name": "tmp-create",
"warning": "Empty string given as passphrase, wallet will not be encrypted.\nWallet is an experimental descriptor wallet"
}
```
## Breaking Changes
You can't more pass 'descriptor=NN' without https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5965 which has not been released yet.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK a42e9df06f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK a42e9df06f
thephez:
utACK a42e9df06f
Tree-SHA512: bf57fed40d04a32e756e4f8bfabbe39c0cbf87275546c92f4efc19523bc3c5dd3ddc5a884d67285971dc301a6c5808bef979db52c35645ca2db0810046fe1bdc
6c5246803d test: add tests for both current and future behaviour (UdjinM6)
4e86bda4dc feat: stricter bestCLHeightDiff checks (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Current `bestCLHeightDiff` checks are too relaxed
## What was done?
Make`bestCLHeightDiff` checks stricter
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run a node on mainnet/testet, run tests
## Breaking Changes
Old nodes aren't aware of this new logic so it's activated via `mn_rr` hardfork
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 6c5246803d
Tree-SHA512: 2028d0ceb00a2270c92831ef38488d009d0bac47be4fc6a23ac93efdcf74847f1b9e99a529863fb4e14c65f120adda4e12c5b9e084d0f667d5f0fbaf80e3701d
b23d94b14f partial bitcoin#23706: getblockfrompeer followups (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7e5cc5e375 merge bitcoin#23702: Add missing optional to getblockfrompeer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c294457b52 merge bitcoin#20295: getblockfrompeer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
63ac87f011 merge bitcoin#22722: update estimatesmartfee rpc to return max of estimateSmartFee, mempoolMinFee and minRelayTxFee. (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
07e4c2cdd0 merge bitcoin#21934: Include versionbits signalling details during LOCKED_IN (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
960e7687d4 merge bitcoin#19651: importdescriptors update existing (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
1f31823fed merge bitcoin#21910: remove redundant fOnlySafe argument (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
69c5aa8947 merge bitcoin#21359: include_unsafe option for fundrawtransaction (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
169dce7e50 merge bitcoin#20286: deprecate addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7cddf70c58 merge bitcoin#20867: Support up to 20 keys for multisig under Segwit context (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7c59923845 merge bitcoin#18344: Fix nit in getblockchaininfo (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ec0803a0f5 refactor: align `TxToUniv` argument list with upstream (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Closes https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/6000
* `TxToUniv`'s argument list needed to be rearranged to match upstream as closely as possible (i.e. placing Dash-specific arguments at the end of the list to allow for code to be backported unmodified, relying on default arguments instead of having to modify each invocation to insert the default argument in between).
This was due to a new `TxToUniv` variant being introduced in [bitcoin#20286](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20286)
* The maximum number of public keys in a multisig remains the same. The upper limit for bare multisigs is and always has been `MAX_PUBKEYS_PER_MULTISIG` ([source](19512988c6/src/script/interpreter.cpp (L1143-L1144))), which has always been 20 ([source](19512988c6/src/script/script.h (L28-L29))). The limit of up to 16 comes from P2SH overhead ([source](19512988c6/src/script/descriptor.cpp (L877-L880))) and that hasn't changed.
In effect, what [bitcoin#20867](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20867) does to Dash Core is change the error from "too many public keys" (as we'll be testing against the bare multisig limit) to "excessive redeemScript size" ([source](19512988c6/src/rpc/util.cpp (L223-L225))) (which is the _true_ limitation).
* Backporting [bitcoin#21934](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21934) required a minor change in the condition needed to emit `activation_height` as `has_signal` in the preceding block will evaluate true for both `STARTED` and `LOCKED_IN` while earlier it would only for `STARTED`.
* In [bitcoin#22722](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22722), a `self.stop_node` had to be added to account for the absurd fee warning that a new test condition introduces.
* [bitcoin#23706](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23706) is partial due to commits in it that rely on RPC type enforcement, which is currently not implemented in Dash Core.
* `feature_dip3_deterministicmns.py` depends on the reporting of `addresses` to validate multisigs containing expected payees. There is no replacement RPC call to report the pubkeys that compose a multisig address. In the interm, the `-deprecatedrpc=addresses` flag has been enabled to allow the test to run otherwise unmodified.
## Breaking Changes
* The following RPCs: `gettxout`, `getrawtransaction`, `decoderawtransaction`, `decodescript`, `gettransaction`, and REST endpoints: `/rest/tx`, `/rest/getutxos`, `/rest/block` deprecated the following fields (which are no longer returned in the responses by default): `addresses`, `reqSigs`.
The `-deprecatedrpc=addresses` flag must be passed for these fields to be included in the RPC response. Note that these fields are attributes of the `scriptPubKey` object returned in the RPC response. However, in the response of `decodescript` these fields are top-level attributes, and included again as attributes of the `scriptPubKey` object.
* When creating a hex-encoded Dash transaction using the `dash-tx` utility with the `-json` option set, the following fields: `addresses`, `reqSigs` are no longer returned in the tx output of the response.
* The error message for attempts at making multisigs with >16 pubkeys will change to an "excessive redeemScript size" instead of the previous "too many public keys".
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK b23d94b14f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b23d94b14f
Tree-SHA512: 659d9ba3a0a9f8594b307a7056ab172309d5a0d9efec605bc4b345f7e0fb1032ad303af9e8f51dbd6549e82d0b738ad41eae8a5b3aebf59081f39df0d4b5ec7c
c9a600e0fa fix: linkage error - message signer better to be common code rather than libconsensus (Konstantin Akimov)
8299b3b369 feat: protxregistar implementation for descriptor wallets (Konstantin Akimov)
6f45432f76 refactor: removed unused SignSpecialTxPayloadByString (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC `protx updateregistar` uses forcely LegacyScriptPubKeyMan instead using CWallet's interface.
It causes a failures such as
```
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: This type of wallet does not support this command (-4)
```
## What was done?
New method `SignSpecialTxPayloadByHash` is implemented in interface instead exporting raw private key for some address.
See https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/59 to track progress
## How Has This Been Tested?
Functional test `feature_dip3_deterministicmns.py` to run by both ways - legacy and descriptor wallets.
Run unit and functional tests.
Extra test done locally:
```diff
--- a/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py
+++ b/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py
@@ -242,10 +242,10 @@ class BitcoinTestFramework(metaclass=BitcoinTestMetaClass):
if self.options.descriptors is None:
# Prefer BDB unless it isn't available
- if self.is_bdb_compiled():
- self.options.descriptors = False
- elif self.is_sqlite_compiled():
+ if self.is_sqlite_compiled():
self.options.descriptors = True
+ elif self.is_bdb_compiled():
+ self.options.descriptors = False
```
to flip flag descriptor wallets/legacy wallets for all functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK c9a600e0fa
Tree-SHA512: 00aea1cd9db3537b9a9dcdee096d47ea48337edeea3f52ad54aea91781678b8641ac2dd86b67f61f87e3912945bcb5361a42a3279b6c08bb8d9f096bed8fe842
3971613285 feat: functional tests for RPC getgovernanceinfo (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/63
## What was done?
It adds functional test for `getgovernanceinfo`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
Check output of `test/functional/test_runner.py -j20 --previous-releases --coverage --extended`
```
Uncovered RPC commands:
- cleardiscouraged
- debug
- getblockheaders
- getmerkleblocks
- getpoolinfo
- voteraw
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3971613285
Tree-SHA512: f2d93db9068a707f2b33dd841b14f266db226fc5e907f19a49cf7a856b840f0c2c1f521c462996888933bb0ed636c288db12b1d36978c124cb536ea1ab9f3892
241f073932 feat: rpc external users are comma separated list (Konstantin Akimov)
68def970ad refactor: re-order arguments options alphabetically (Konstantin Akimov)
c7efd56a07 feat: rpc external users: use 2 queues but no extra threads (Konstantin Akimov)
c575a5808a feat: change handler to '/' for external users, use only rpc user name to choose queue (Konstantin Akimov)
f1c1fd873e feat: implementation for /external handler for RPC (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
To avoid struggling to response to critical rpc requests, and split them from 3rd parties who uses a node as an external service, there are introduced one more queue of requests that will be served without throttling for instance consensus important rpcs
## What was done?
new command line arguments:
- `rpcexternaluser` - List of comma-separated usernames for JSON-RPC external connections. If not specified, there's no special queue is created, all requests in one queue
- `rpcexternalworkqueue=<n>` - Set the depth of the work queue to service external RPC calls
## How Has This Been Tested?
Functional test `rpc_platform_filter.py` is updated to test new functionality
## Breaking Changes
NA
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 241f073932
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 241f073932
Tree-SHA512: 15b371f24f5302853b85419e2b20c29749d6aae1c98a541d7471f1d3a681643063302c2a5ecce04dfad2da9101ea69d2f08a7e0e11a28609c6011d78273c57a7
18328279ec fix: force mnsync to skip gov obj sync on reconnection (UdjinM6)
08331bb950 fix: apply suggestions (UdjinM6)
3c3489d7a1 test: add test (UdjinM6)
41ab95dbf8 feat: skip governance checks for blocks below the best chainlock (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
A node can miss governance trigger sometimes and then it would stuck not being able to sync any further. This issue can be fixed manually by resetting sync status and reconsidering the "invalid" block. However, that's inconvenient. Also, what it does under the hood is it simply disables some parts of block validation. We could do that automagically and more precise if we would trust ChainLocks instead.
## What was done?
Skip governance checks for blocks below the best known chainlock, add tests.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 18328279ec
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 18328279ec
Tree-SHA512: 3cc4e2707e24b36c9f64502561667d0cb66eced7019db7941781ab1b84cfd267b3dab4684c71b059e074450ea76dc8e342744bffdd1ca1be6ccceb34b3580659
faa137eb9eac5554504b062a6dc865ca87fd572b test: Speed up rpc_blockchain.py by removing miniwallet.generate() (MarcoFalke)
fa1fe80c757df0adcbfaf41b5c5c8a468bc07b6f test: Change address type from P2PKH to P2WSH in rpc_blockchain (MarcoFalke)
fa4d8f3169e38cbdbae20258efebe7070c49f522 test: Cache 25 mature coins for ADDRESS_BCRT1_P2WSH_OP_TRUE (MarcoFalke)
fad25153f5c8e88f72cf666b16b0b0dbdc45d3b1 test: Remove unused bug workaround (MarcoFalke)
faabce7d07c5776e4116b1a7ad1f6c408a4a4e46 test: Start only the number of nodes that are needed (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Speed up various tests:
* Remove unused nodes, which only consume time on start/stop
* Remove unused "bug workarounds"
* Remove the need for `miniwallet.generate()` by adding `miniwallet.scan_blocks()`. (On my system, with valgrind, generating 105 blocks takes 3.31 seconds. Rescanning 5 blocks takes 0.11 seconds.)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK faa137eb9eac5554504b062a6dc865ca87fd572b
Tree-SHA512: ead1988d5aaa748ef9f8520af1e0bf812cf1d72e281ad22fbd172b7306d850053040526f8adbcec0b9a971c697a0ee7ee8962684644d65b791663eedd505a025
fa61b9d1a68820758f9540653920deaeae6abe79 util: Add ArgsManager::GetCommand() and use it in bitcoin-wallet (MarcoFalke)
7777105a24a36b62df35d12ecf6c6370671568c8 refactor: Move all command dependend checks to ExecuteWalletToolFunc (MarcoFalke)
fa06bce4ac17f93decd4ee38c956e7aa55983f0d test: Add tests (MarcoFalke)
fac05ccdade8b34c969b9cd9b37b355bc0aabf9c wallet: [refactor] Pass ArgsManager to WalletAppInit (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This not only moves the parsing responsibility out from the wallet tool, but it also makes it easier to implement bitcoin-util #19937Fixes: #20902
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa61b9d1a68820758f9540653920deaeae6abe79
fjahr:
Code review ACK fa61b9d1a68820758f9540653920deaeae6abe79
Tree-SHA512: 79622b806e8bf9dcd0dc24a8a6687345710df57720992e83a41cd8d6762a6dc112044ebc58fcf6e8fbf45de29a79b04873c5b8c2494a1eaaf902a2884703e47b
faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a p2p: Ignore version msgs after initial version msg (MarcoFalke)
fad68afcff731153d1c83f7f56c91ecbb264b59a p2p: Ignore non-version msgs before version msg (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Handshake misbehaviour doesn't cost us more than any other unknown message, so it seems odd to treat it differently
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a
practicalswift:
ACK faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 9f30c3b5c1f6604fd02cff878f10999956152419a3dd9825f8267cbdeff7d06787418b41c7fde8a00a5e557fe89204546e05d5689042dbf7b07fbb7eb95cddff
fb8a4db8f6 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26717: test: Improve `check-doc.py` pattern (MarcoFalke)
349cad2865 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26708: clang-tidy: Fix `modernize-use-nullptr` in headers (MarcoFalke)
6bf786d168 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25735: net: remove useless call to IsReachable() from CConnman::Bind() (fanquake)
012b0b7169 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24258: test: check localaddresses in getnetworkinfo for nodes with proxy (MarcoFalke)
c67f527b0b Merge bitcoin-core/gui#448: Add helper to load font (Hennadii Stepanov)
8e0abeb1c1 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#345: Connection Type Translator Comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
688b66e9d1 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#266: Doc: Copyright: Fix embedded font file location (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Trivial backports
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Built and ran tests locally; p2p_addr_relay.py fails locally. Not sure why
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK fb8a4db8f6
knst:
utACK fb8a4db8f6
Tree-SHA512: abb9469f25c6d45acea01da6d2b9cb6df94822f61d06f80e3008b32d2522016370a1e0b0c9ff95b92df22c4f227fc40f7765d76f1987eac7603155fe2d894593
89bb25d22a0e1c700dba4e3b754984c9b2b14836 test: check localaddresses in getnetworkinfo for nodes with proxy (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the field `localaddresses` for `getnetworkinfo`. In this case, it verifies if this field is empty for all nodes since they are using proxy.
Reference:
515200298b/src/init.cpp (L449)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 89bb25d22a0e1c700dba4e3b754984c9b2b14836
Tree-SHA512: 3c765c7060b6972c1ae5a1104734cd7669b650b5f6aa4f623f4299567732260da5083fef306a7c1e71c931f5d1396f24abad251d95c3d82b1f3ee0efee7fcd1f
1cbf3b9a53 merge bitcoin-core/gui#206: Display fRelayTxes and bip152_highbandwidth_{to, from} in peer details (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
239062192e merge bitcoin#20764: cli -netinfo peer connections dashboard updates (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
06a6f8444c merge bitcoin#25147: follow ups to #20799 (removing support for v1 compact blocks) (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
6274a571b7 merge bitcoin#20799: Only support version 2 compact blocks (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
f4ce573538 merge bitcoin#22340: Use legacy relaying to download blocks in blocks-only mode (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
73b8f84fdb merge bitcoin#22147: p2p: Protect last outbound HB compact block peer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
2ce481849a merge bitcoin#20599: Tolerate sendheaders and sendcmpct messages before verack (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
799214b2c8 merge bitcoin#19776: expose high bandwidth mode state via getpeerinfo (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Version 2 of BIP152 high-bandwidth mode/compact blocks implements SegWit support.
As Dash does not implement SegWit, there has never been a need to implement v2 (and therefore, have all the code necessary to support both v1 and v2, that gets removed as part of making support v2 only).
* Despite that, the changes surrounding removing support for both versions (that in our case, do not apply as we never have supported v2) refactor the code in other ways and influence their behaviour. In the interest of upstream alignment, those changes have been backported.
* [bitcoin#19776](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19776) doesn't seem to work on its own without successive backports, specifically [bitcoin#20799](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20799), despite the latter being a later backport.
<details>
<summary>19776-only p2p_compactblocks.py run (9f2c868947cc254d021e1a9bd00eb7bc80061e81)</summary>
```
dash@825a14c32b73:/src/dash$ ./test/functional/p2p_compactblocks.py
2024-06-09T12:29:09.777000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/dash_func_test_kb2nr5oe
2024-06-09T12:29:16.341000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing SENDCMPCT p2p message...
2024-06-09T12:29:31.432000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing compactblock construction...
2024-06-09T12:29:40.068000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing compactblock requests...
2024-06-09T12:29:44.597000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing getblocktxn handler...
2024-06-09T12:29:59.808000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing compactblock requests/announcements not at chain tip...
2024-06-09T12:30:03.855000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing handling of incorrect blocktxn responses...
2024-06-09T12:30:05.868000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing reconstructing compact blocks from all peers...
2024-06-09T12:30:09.389000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing end-to-end block relay...
2024-06-09T12:30:10.404000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing handling of invalid compact blocks...
2024-06-09T12:30:12.418000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing invalid index in cmpctblock message...
2024-06-09T12:30:14.384000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo...
2024-06-09T12:30:16.893000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 158, in main
self.run_test()
File "./test/functional/p2p_compactblocks.py", line 849, in run_test
self.test_highbandwidth_mode_states_via_getpeerinfo()
File "./test/functional/p2p_compactblocks.py", line 791, in test_highbandwidth_mode_states_via_getpeerinfo
hb_test_node.send_and_ping(msg_block(block))
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py", line 579, in send_and_ping
self.sync_with_ping(timeout=timeout)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py", line 596, in sync_with_ping
self.wait_until(test_function, timeout=timeout)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py", line 487, in wait_until
wait_until_helper(test_function, timeout=timeout, lock=p2p_lock, timeout_factor=self.timeout_factor)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 249, in wait_until_helper
if predicate():
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py", line 484, in test_function
assert self.is_connected
AssertionError
2024-06-09T12:30:17.396000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2024-06-09T12:30:18.400000Z TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/dash_func_test_kb2nr5oe
2024-06-09T12:30:18.401000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/dash_func_test_kb2nr5oe/test_framework.log
2024-06-09T12:30:18.401000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-06-09T12:30:18.401000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Hint: Call /src/dash/test/functional/combine_logs.py '/tmp/dash_func_test_kb2nr5oe' to consolidate all logs
2024-06-09T12:30:18.401000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-06-09T12:30:18.401000Z TestFramework (ERROR): If this failure happened unexpectedly or intermittently, please file a bug and provide a link or upload of the combined log.
2024-06-09T12:30:18.402000Z TestFramework (ERROR): https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues
2024-06-09T12:30:18.402000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>20799-incl p2p_compactblocks.py run (aa116c4f0b4753b615f9483aa03adec5ee4fd655)</summary>
```
dash@825a14c32b73:/src/dash$ ./test/functional/p2p_compactblocks.py
2024-06-09T12:34:27.169000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/dash_func_test_7d65lmhz
2024-06-09T12:34:32.695000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing SENDCMPCT p2p message...
2024-06-09T12:34:51.288000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing compactblock construction...
2024-06-09T12:34:55.325000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing compactblock requests...
2024-06-09T12:34:59.861000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing getblocktxn handler...
2024-06-09T12:35:07.460000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing compactblock requests/announcements not at chain tip...
2024-06-09T12:35:09.503000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing handling of incorrect blocktxn responses...
2024-06-09T12:35:11.519000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing reconstructing compact blocks from all peers...
2024-06-09T12:35:15.039000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing end-to-end block relay...
2024-06-09T12:35:16.055000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing handling of invalid compact blocks...
2024-06-09T12:35:17.062000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing invalid index in cmpctblock message...
2024-06-09T12:35:19.139000Z TestFramework (INFO): Testing high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo...
2024-06-09T12:35:22.159000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2024-06-09T12:35:23.163000Z TestFramework (INFO): Cleaning up /tmp/dash_func_test_7d65lmhz on exit
2024-06-09T12:35:23.163000Z TestFramework (INFO): Tests successful
```
</details>
* The backport of [bitcoin-core/gui#206](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/206) is a continuation of 3e8ba24c87 from [dash#5964](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5964)
* The backport of [bitcoin#20764](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20764) is a continuation of bd934c71eb from [dash#6034](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6034)
## Breaking changes
* The `getpeerinfo` RPC returns two new boolean fields, `bip152_hb_to` and `bip152_hb_from`, that respectively indicate whether we selected a peer to be in compact blocks high-bandwidth mode or whether a peer selected us as a compact blocks high-bandwidth peer.
High-bandwidth peers send new block announcements via a `cmpctblock` message rather than the usual inv/headers announcements. See BIP 152 for more details.
* Blocks-only mode will use legacy relaying instead of BIP152 high-bandwidth mode
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 1cbf3b9a53
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 1cbf3b9a53
knst:
utACK 1cbf3b9a53
Tree-SHA512: 5947b622d8d57a1dc9445cd6e07d4ad690379416d0fcf04ed574269975d1beb704691a79ff081341f3c800cf11869d401f1ed90baa5449f371f9ce658f2d2e95
a93fec6f2d merge bitcoin#23380: Fix AddrMan::Add() return semantics and logging (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d1a4b14b48 merge bitcoin#23354: Introduce new V4 format addrman (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7a97aabfe0 test: restore pre-bitcoin#23306 tests to validate port distinguishment (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
1a050d6cb4 merge bitcoin#23306: Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IP (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d56702aa0c merge bitcoin#23140: Make CAddrman::Select_ select buckets, not positions, first (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
19b0145379 merge bitcoin#22839: improve addrman logging (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
3910c68028 merge bitcoin#23053: Use public methods in addrman fuzz tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b6ec8ab6df merge bitcoin#22950: Pimpl AddrMan to abstract implementation details (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
236cf36d88 merge bitcoin#22734: Avoid crash on corrupt data, Force Check after deserialize (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
2420ac9e53 merge bitcoin#23041: Add addrman deserialization error tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
8aefa9b93a merge bitcoin#22762: Raise InitError when peers.dat is invalid or corrupted (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c9a645f814 merge bitcoin#22879: Fix format string in deserialize error (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6040.
* Dash already introduced support for storage of address-port pairs (referred to as "port discrimination") and allowed the usage of non-default ports in P2P with [dash#2168](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/2168).
* Albeit this was only permitted for networks with `fAllowMultiplePorts` enabled (which at the time was `devnet` and as it stands currently, on every network except `mainnet`).
* Keeping in line with the above policy (discussion on lifting such restrictions on `mainnet` is outside the scope of this PR), when backporting [bitcoin#23306](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23306), changes have been made to retain the effects of `discriminate_ports`.
* This involves appending placing a `!m_discriminate_ports` condition to behaviour that otherwise would be _removed_ entirely.
* Additionally, in line with upstream backports, changes have been made that render port distinguishment _enabled_ as the new default in `addrman_tests` (the old default was to keep it _disabled_, to mirror `mainnet` and pre-change upstream behaviour).
* To ensure distinguishment _disabled_ works as expected, affected pre-backport tests were reintroduced with the `_nondiscriminate` suffix.
---
I would propose at some point to rename the flag to `ignore_port`/`suppress_port` (if not remove it altogether should the `mainnet` restriction be lifted) as discriminate (or distinguish) isn't immediately clear with if address entries will be discriminated/distinguished _using_ ports (i.e. considered) or ports will be discriminated _against_ (i.e. ignored).
## Breaking Changes
It's unclear if these backports result in serialization issues for older versions, as Dash Core technically supported address-port pairs since 0.12 and suppressed it on `mainnet` by setting zero-ing out the port ([source](19512988c6/src/addrman.cpp (L135-L138))), meaning even with port discrimination _disabled_, the serialization format should remain the same.
Regardless, following upstream backports, a new version has been introduced (v4) that marks the AddrMan format incompatible with older versions of Dash Core.
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK a93fec6f2d
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK a93fec6f2d
Tree-SHA512: 49b35af3e4eb660249ce9a65d5a539205d852e9c728da22dc88779f6b3b15c13cf91522896a313bfe2a91889fedf3b6b2cebdea12cc2bbe865ec3b85b6a5dfa8
6777ab73a2 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#682: Don't directly delete abandoned txes from GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
6e1a8c1fdc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26628: RPC: Reject RPC requests with same named parameter specified multiple times (MarcoFalke)
7c28b01c78 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26666: refactor: Deleted unreachable code in httpserver.cpp (MarcoFalke)
478fe51ead Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26100: doc: clarify that NetPermissionFlags::Implicit is only about whitelists (MarcoFalke)
69b19cbfc0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26546: test: remove unused class `NodePongAdd1` (fanquake)
245df942c4 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26380: Revert "test: check importing wallets when blocks are pruned throw an error" (MacroFake)
3db3bd0d31 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24269: test: add functional test for `-discover` (Andrew Chow)
c72ef299da Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25896: wallet: Log when Wallet::SetMinVersion sets a different minversion (Andrew Chow)
12b438cb46 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25925: doc: add `{import,list}descriptors` to list of descriptor RPCs (Andrew Chow)
73d64c48a9 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25738: depends: use a patch instead of sed in libxcb (fanquake)
1fae0c2bbb Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25333: test: Fix out-of-range port collisions (MacroFake)
b75089667c Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25231: ci: Install documented packages for "Win64" CI task (fanquake)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Batch of trivial backports
## What was done?
Trivial backports
## How Has This Been Tested?
Built; ran tests locally
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 6777ab73a2
Tree-SHA512: 60d68c8d0fb9875d0b2421cad97b46a9d4deb79e03ca011d66cc0595ed68bb7ad207f2fd95973a3b7a0b9bca2c2f0deaf0e1116f0312a4d9d315f009228fe485
8c3ff7d52ae3314959e1e66da8718a3f0d30abaa test: Suggested cleanups for rpc_namedparams test (Ryan Ofsky)
d1ca56382512df3084fce7353bf1e8b66cae61bc bitcoin-cli: Make it an error to specify the "args" parameter two different ways (Ryan Ofsky)
6bd1d20b8cf27aa72ec2907342787e6fc9f94c50 rpc: Make it an error server-side to specify same named parameter multiple times (Ryan Ofsky)
e2c3b18e671e347e422d696d1cbdd9f82b2ce468 test: Add RPC tests for same named parameter specified more than once (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Make the JSON-RPC server reject requests with the same named parameter specified multiple times, instead of silently overwriting earlier parameter values with later ones.
Generally JSON keys are supposed to unique, and their order isn't supposed to be significant, so having the server silently discard duplicate keys is error-prone. Most likely if an RPC client is sending a request with duplicate keys it means something is wrong with the request and there should be an error.
After this change, named parameters are still allowed to specified multiple times on the `bitcoin-cli` command line, since `bitcoin-cli` automatically replaces earlier values with later values before sending the JSON-RPC request. This makes sense, since it's not unusual for the order of command line options to be significant or for later command line options to override earlier ones.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8c3ff7d52ae3314959e1e66da8718a3f0d30abaa 🗂
kristapsk:
ACK 8c3ff7d52ae3314959e1e66da8718a3f0d30abaa
stickies-v:
ACK 8c3ff7d52
Tree-SHA512: 2d1357dcc2c171da287aeefc7b333ba4e67babfb64fc14d7fa0940256e18010a2a65054f3bf7fa1571b144d2de8b82d53076111b5f97ba29320cfe84b6ed986f
32f8fda7d6 merge bitcoin#24991: allow startup with -onlynet=onion -listenonion=1 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e67ed92d3d merge bitcoin#25173: add coverage for unknown network in -onlynet (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
77efd36112 merge bitcoin#24687: Check an invalid -i2psam will raise an init error (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
fb1416f7cb merge bitcoin#24205: improve network reachability test coverage and safety (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7cb7479829 merge bitcoin#24663: add links to doc/cjdns.md (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c736ebf566 merge bitcoin#24555: create initial doc/cjdns.md for CJDNS how-to documentation (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
554bd24186 partial bitcoin#24468: improve -onlynet help and related tor/i2p documentation (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
5436b6a82d merge bitcoin#24165: extend inbound eviction protection by network to CJDNS peers (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d52724d039 merge bitcoin#22834: respect -onlynet= when making outbound connections (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
f9d1a9a00d merge bitcoin#23077: Full CJDNS support (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6034
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6035
* If `-proxy=` is given together with `-noonion` then the provided proxy will not be set as a proxy for reaching the Tor network. So it will not be possible to open manual connections to the Tor network for example with the `addnode` RPC. To mimic the old behavior use `-proxy=` together with `-onlynet=` listing all relevant networks except `onion`.
* [bitcoin#24165](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24165) has been backported _before_ [bitcoin#23758](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23758) and to account for this, minor changes were made in `src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp` (using `nTimeConnected` instead of `m_connected`). When backporting [bitcoin#23758](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23758), these changes will have to be reversed as they won't be covered by the cherry-pick diff.
* CJDNS support has been labelled as being introduced in Dash Core 21.0, in line with the milestone designation of the PR. Should `develop` be used for a new minor/patch release, `doc/cjdns.md` will have to be modified to reflect the correct version number.
## Breaking changes
No expected protocol or consensus changes.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 32f8fda7d6
Tree-SHA512: e23b22ca5edbe4c4abeab0bc07780303e68e7c4cc46b7697300b0837c5acd3a98649b6b03bd07a23c827bd85f64210173027b0b0eea31872c031fa4ed04eeb0c
