b902bd66b0f35c5016dc5d7aaf501940935edd62 test: check custom descendant limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #17435, testing the custom descendant limit, passed by the argument `-limitdescendantcount`. ~~It was more tricky than expected, mainly because we don't know for sure at which point node1 has got all the transactions broadcasted from node0 (for the ancestor test this wasn't a problem since the txs were immediately available through `invalidateblock`) -- a simple `sync_mempools()` doesn't work here since the mempool contents are not equal due to different ancestor/descendant limits. Hence I came up with a "hacky manual sync":~~
1. ~~wait until the mempool has the _expected_ tx count (see conditions below)~~
2. ~~after that, wait some time and get sure that the mempool contents haven't changed in-between~~
~~Like for~~ Similar to the ancestor test, we overall check for ~~three~~ four conditions:
- the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the descendant limit (plus 1 for the parent tx, plus the # txs from the previous ancestor test which are still in) ~~(done by the hacky sync above)~~
- all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
- part of the constructed descendant-chain (the first ones up to the limit) are contained in node1 mempool
- the remaining part of the constructed descendant-chain (all after the first ones up to the limit) is *not* contained in node1 mempool
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
Excellent. utACK b902bd6
Tree-SHA512: 7de96dd248f16ab740e178ac5b64b57ead18cdcf74adfe989709d215e4a67b6b6d20de22c48e885d5f2edc55caaddd44a4261e996c5c87687ceb6a47f1d1fdaf
0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82 Add static_asserts to ser_X_to_Y() methods (Samer Afach)
be94096dfb0c4862e2314cbae4120d7360b08ef2 Fix a violation of C++ standard rules that unions cannot be switched. (Samer Afach)
Pull request description:
Type punning in C++ is not like C. As per the C++ standard, one cannot use unions to convert the bit type. A discussion about this can be found [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25664848/unions-and-type-punning). In C++, a union is supposed to only hold one type at a time. It's intended to be used only as `std::variant`. Switching types is undefined behavior.
In fact, C++20 has a special casting function, called [`bit_cast`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/bit_cast) that solved this problem.
Why has it been working so far? Because some compilers tolerate using unions and switching types, like gcc. More information [here](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#Type-punning).
One important thing to mention is that performance is generally not affected by that memcpy. Compilers are smart enough to convert that to a memory cast when possible. But we have to do it the right way, otherwise, it's jut undefined behavior that depends on the compiler.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
elichai:
ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
kristapsk:
ACK 0653939ac130eddffe40c53ac418bea305d3bf82
Tree-SHA512: f6e89de39fc964750429139bab6b5a1346f7060334b7afa020e315bdad8f8c195bce2b8a9e343f06e7fff175e2dfb1cdabfcb6fe405bea0febe4962f0cc62557
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041 util: Avoid potential uninitialized read in FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t nTime) by checking gmtime_s/gmtime_r return value (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid potential uninitialized read in `FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t)` by checking `gmtime_s`/`gmtime_r` return value.
Before this patch `FormatISO8601DateTime(67768036191676800)` resulted in:
```
==5930== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==5930== at 0x4F44C0A: std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::_M_insert_int<long>(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25)
==5930== by 0x4F511A4: std::ostream& std::ostream::_M_insert<long>(long) (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25)
==5930== by 0x4037C3: void tinyformat::formatValue<int>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, int const&) (tinyformat.h:358)
==5930== by 0x403725: void tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::formatImpl<int>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, void const*) (tinyformat.h:543)
==5930== by 0x402E02: tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::format(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int) const (tinyformat.h:528)
==5930== by 0x401B16: tinyformat::detail::formatImpl(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::detail::FormatArg const*, int) (tinyformat.h:907)
==5930== by 0x4017AE: tinyformat::vformat(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::FormatList const&) (tinyformat.h:1054)
==5930== by 0x401765: void tinyformat::format<int, int, int, int, int, int>(std::ostream&, char const*, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&) (tinyformat.h:1064)
==5930== by 0x401656: std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > tinyformat::format<int, int, int, int, int, int>(char const*, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&, int const&) (tinyformat.h:1073)
==5930== by 0x4014CC: FormatISO8601DateTime[abi:cxx11](long) (…)
```
The same goes for other very large positive and negative arguments.
Fix by simply checking the `gmtime_s`/`gmtime_r` return value :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041
theStack:
re-ACK 12a2f37718
elichai:
re ACK 12a2f377185a413b740460db36812de22ee2e041
Tree-SHA512: 066142670d9bf0944d41fa3f3c702b1a460b5471b93e76a619b1e818ff9bb9c09fe14c4c37e9536a04c99533f7f21d1b08ac141e1b829ff87ee54c80d0e61d48
bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678 scripted-diff: Wallet: Rename incorrectly named *UsedDestination (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
These functions are used to mark/check if a key of our own has been used to spend (and only for avoid-reuse wallets), which has nothing to do with the destination/address itself.
Give them more accurate names to avoid confusion.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/UsedDestination/SpentKey/g' $(git grep -l 'UsedDestination' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678 -- patch looks correct and rationale makes sense
instagibbs:
ACK bca8665d08, much more meaningful name, thanks
kallewoof:
ACK bca8665d0895c450e552c357a036d9e9579e3678
Tree-SHA512: ff13d9061ffa748e92eb41ba962c3ec262a43e4b6abd62408b38c6f650395d6ae5851554257d1900fb02767a88d08380d592a27210192ee9abb72d0945976686
63ce882760e1ceb4114c716851aedaf911ebb93b doc: link to homebrew's troubleshooting page (Gastón I. Silva)
Pull request description:
A trivial documentation update.
When I was following the build steps for mac, I had some errors installing the dependencies. After searching on the Internet, and correcting the errors, I found that `brew doctor` had all the answers I needed. Could have skipped the Internet searches all together.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 63ce882760e1ceb4114c716851aedaf911ebb93b - a link to the troubleshooting page seems fine. I wouldn't really want our README to have anything more specific than that.
Tree-SHA512: 12c96cd9c9bd39ada21f3f27cbec3ed4bef4b8e74dec7872c892fc6a92a70418a5cc0882ff449883e91d96c01e1ca7104b076590917f397334c82931ec7fda1c
f2472f64604a0c583f950c56e8753d0bee246388 tests: Improve test runner output in case of target errors (practicalswift)
733bbec34fbec85574cc456832b2b2f807e5dce9 tests: Add --exclude integer,parse_iso8601 (temporarily) to make Travis pass until uninitialized read issue in FormatISO8601DateTime is fixed (practicalswift)
5ea81449f30a6fe6db3b6df5e8009f21a782ff44 tests: Add support for excluding fuzz targets using -x/--exclude (practicalswift)
555236f769c13518db70f5df36e5688d63486bd5 tests: Remove -detect_leaks=0 from test/fuzz/test_runner.py - no longer needed (practicalswift)
a3b539a924f8611abb3096f2bd9d35094b5577e3 ci: Run fuzz testing test cases under valgrind (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Run fuzz testing [test cases (bitcoin-core/qa-assets)](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets) under `valgrind`.
This would have caught `util: Avoid potential uninitialized read in FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t) by checking gmtime_s/gmtime_r return value` (#18162) and similar cases.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f2472f64604a0c583f950c56e8753d0bee246388 👼
Tree-SHA512: bb0879d40167cf6906bc0ed31bed39db83c39c7beb46026f7b0ee53f28ff0526ad6fabc3f4cb3f5f18d3b8cafdcbf5f30105b35919f4e83697c71e838ed71493
* refactor: add more [[nodiscard]]
* refactor: drop unneeded .get()
* refactor: use functional style int cast
* refactor: use std::numeric_limits::max()
* refactor: use GetRand instead of GetRandInt
* refactor/fix: use the shared_ptr<CWallet> where possible instead of getting the underlying pointer
This is also a fix in regards to the rpcevo.cpp file where the old code could result in a dangling pointer that could result in a crash as the shared_ptr we get back is discarded while the underlying ptr is still being used
* refactor: remove unneeded line
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff379131a01e4e9f9648b150e806104a23795 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e20f881c843a9219e48cec202e962f8 wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96 rpc: Deprecate getunconfirmedbalance and getwalletinfo balances (MarcoFalke)
999931cf8f167c7547f1015cdf05437a460c27f0 rpc: Add getbalances RPC (MarcoFalke)
fad13e925e197163a942f3f0d1ba2c95a2b65a56 rpcwallet: Make helper methods const on CWallet (MarcoFalke)
fad40ec9151248c6e8225e14980424f581d23e02 wallet: Use IsValidNumArgs in getwalletinfo rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes the `CWallet::GetBalance()` struct over RPC.
In the future, incorrectly named rpcs such as `getunconfirmedbalance` or rpcs redundant to this such as `getbalance` could be removed.
ACKs for commit facfb4:
jnewbery:
utACK facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96
Tree-SHA512: 1f54fedce55df9a8ea82d2b6265354b39a956072621876ebaee2355aac0e23c7b64340c3279502415598c095858529e18b50789be956250aafda1cd3a8d948a5
2b1641492fbf81e2c5a95f3e580811ca8700adc5 wallet: Improve CWallet:MarkDestinationsDirty (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Improve `CWallet:MarkDestinationsDirty` by skipping transactions that already have the cache invalidated. Skipping a transaction avoids at worst case extracting all output destinations.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK 2b1641492fbf81e2c5a95f3e580811ca8700adc5
Tree-SHA512: 479dc2dde4b653b856e3d6a0c59a34fe33e963eb131a2d88552a8b30471b8725a087888fe5d7db6e4ee19b74072fe64441497f033be7d1931637f756e0d8fef5
6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66 wallet: Reset reused transactions cache (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17603 (together with #17824)
`getbalances` is using the cache within `GetAvailableCredit` under certain conditions [here](35fff5be60/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L1826)). For a wallet with `avoid_reuse` activated this can lead to inconsistent reporting of `used` transactions/balances between `getbalances` and `listunspent` as pointed out in #17603. When an address is reused before the first transaction is spending from this address, the cache is not updated even after the transaction is sent. This means the remaining outputs at the reused address are not showing up as `used` in `getbalances`.
With this change, any newly incoming transaction belonging to the wallet marks all the other outputs at the same address as dirty.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Code review re-ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66
promag:
ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66.
achow101:
Re-ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66
Tree-SHA512: c4cad2c752176d16d77b4a4202291d20baddf9f27250896a40274d74a6945e0f6b34be04c2f9b1b2e756d3ac669b794969df8f82a98e0b16f10e92f276649ea2
1bb5d517aa616c1d5b5801d2ea36a2de5fb61eba test: add unit test for non-standard bare multisig txs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing unit test of issue #17394: Checks that the function `IsStandardTx()` returns rejection reason `"bare-multisig"` if any one of the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisignature format (i.e. `M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ... <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG`, not P2SH!) and the policy flag `fIsBareMultisigStd` is set to false.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 1bb5d517aa
Tree-SHA512: d7c95e35da16520d6dcd2b4278e2426fedd13f68d1f23c90e85e929774e123fbfcfbccc26df6ad1c0dd61780896fa4b4b3d4e8280c647bb06df2bfcf2ba572fb
8f2d7737cc236b6122f30e31856eb3181960fba1 test: add functional test for non-standard txs with too large scriptSig (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing functional test of issue #17394 (counterpart to unit test in PR #17480, Commit 5e8a56348b): A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason `"scriptsig-size"` if any of the inputs' scriptSig is larger than 1650 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8f2d7737cc236b6122f30e31856eb3181960fba1
instagibbs:
ACK 8f2d7737cc
Tree-SHA512: 7a45b8a4181158be3e3b91756783ddf032f132ca8780dc35fac91b2df2149268f784d28ac56005135c4d86a357c57805c5a54b8155f0d049932844b18dc03992
5e8a56348b5e1026e9ddcae0b2fa2a68faf4439e test: add unit test for non-standard txs with too large scriptSig (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches the first missing test of issue #17394: Checks that the function `IsStandardTx()` returns rejection reason `"scriptsig-size"` if any one the inputs' scriptSig is larger than 1650 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5e8a56348b5e1026e9ddcae0b2fa2a68faf4439e
instagibbs:
ACK 5e8a56348b
Tree-SHA512: 79977b12ddea9438a37cefdbb48cc551e4ad02a8ccfaa2d2837ced9f3a185e2e07cc366c243b9e3c7736245e90e315d7b4110efc6b440c63dbef7ee2c9d78a73
297e09855793feb94c3229ed989bef8b1eac864e Fix doxygen errors (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
These are all the remaining errors identified via -Werror=documentation, e.g.:
```
./rpc/rawtransaction_util.h:31:13: error: parameter 'prevTxs' not found in the function declaration [-Werror,-Wdocumentation]
* @param prevTxs Array of previous txns outputs that tx depends on but may not yet be in the block chain
^~~~~~~
./rpc/rawtransaction_util.h:31:13: note: did you mean 'prevTxsUnival'?
* @param prevTxs Array of previous txns outputs that tx depends on but may not yet be in the block chain
^~~~~~~
prevTxsUnival
netbase.cpp:766:11: error: parameter 'outProxyConnectionFailed[out]' not found in the function declaration [-Werror,-Wdocumentation]
* @param outProxyConnectionFailed[out] Whether or not the connection to the
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
netbase.cpp:766:11: note: did you mean 'outProxyConnectionFailed'?
* @param outProxyConnectionFailed[out] Whether or not the connection to the
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
outProxyConnectionFailed
```
You can use this to run with `-Wdocumentation` yourself: #14920
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 297e09855793feb94c3229ed989bef8b1eac864e
Tree-SHA512: a232d893b170873d923e77fa56c56a6567e7fd120b5af1f52cfeeae1093eec55621604cc80a523678f6fedc8bbb31228c4aa8dc2a630ce9ffc91525988522af7
e1c582cbaa4c094d204da34c3b1fdd0d4c557519 contrib: makeseeds: Read suspicious hosts from a file instead of hardcoding (Sanjay K)
Pull request description:
referring to: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17020
good first issue: reading SUSPICIOUS_HOSTS from a file.
I haven't changed the base hosts that were included in the original source, just made it readable from a file.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK e1c582cbaa4c094d204da34c3b1fdd0d4c557519 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 18684abc1c02cf52d63f6f6ecd98df01a9574a7c470524c37e152296504e2e3ffbabd6f3208214b62031512aeb809a6d37446af82c9f480ff14ce4c42c98e7c2
1be0b1fb2adcf95d76f879195564c0bf84162e31 test: add functional test for non-standard bare multisig txs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing functional test of issue #17394 (counterpart to unit test in PR #17502): A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason `"bare-multisig"` if any of the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisig format (`M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ... <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG`) and bitcoind is started with the argument `-permitbaremultisig=0`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 1be0b1fb2a
kristapsk:
ACK 1be0b1fb2adcf95d76f879195564c0bf84162e31
Tree-SHA512: 2cade68c4454029b62278b38d0f137c2605a0e4450c435cdda2833667234edd4406f017ed12fa8df9730618654acbaeb68b16dcabb9f5aa84bad9f1c76c6d476
831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c build: remove double LIBBITCOIN_SERVER linking (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Seems that this is no longer required. Have tested building on macOS and Debian.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c.
practicalswift:
ACK 831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c
laanwj:
ACK 831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c
Tree-SHA512: d226d9fa0292189fae7e2af14781a511c3633f1352324f19ae642e941d06c34e2abf8b1df97d2330d76dba6024a93d8d341e02cc4882d7066f97e82585631fe1
168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a Continue relaying transactions after they expire from mapRelay (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This change allows peers to request transactions even after they've expired from mapRelay and even if they're not doing mempool requests. This is intended to allow for CPFP of old transactions -- if parent tx P wasn't relayed due to low fees, then a higher fee rate child C is relayed, peers will currently request the parent P, but we prior to this patch, we will not relay it due to it not being in mapRelay.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a (only change is comment fixup)
sdaftuar:
re-ACK 168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a
sipa:
ACK 168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a
Tree-SHA512: b206666dd1450cd0a161ae55fd1a7eda2c3d226842ba27d91fe463b551fd924b65b92551b14d6786692e15cf9a9a989666550dfc980b48ab0f8d4ca305bc7762
fa40e48c50d8ccf42ce5e66c12390e2ed4b60e75 ci: Remove unparseable lines from supp file for old xenial clang tsan (MarcoFalke)
fa1bfc476c9208a4c412c8ca74d05f52bb47766f ci: ubsan report_error_type=1 and add suppressions (MarcoFalke)
fa69cef13e5aab8264339eb3d50a9e89d59efd87 test: Print stderr when subprocess fails (MarcoFalke)
2222c305866a77065ab5be24c1c252bae252bb59 test: Use char instead of unsigned char (MarcoFalke)
faa8023ce9a47b282e1fac3ca8b3a7bb0042935a ci: Bump to clang-8 for asan build to avoid segfaults on ppc64le (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Use clang-8 instead of default clang (which is clang-6 on Bionic) to avoid spurious segfaults when running the ci system on ppc64le
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa40e48c50d8ccf42ce5e66c12390e2ed4b60e75 assuming Travis is happy -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: f4f26232d3a0ef38da245869340f723d279a3db9823befbc735fb5a00024dae041c7306d7ae55d2488e6f86aa96cdea155b007aefb561fba505141e8dbc717dc
It's incorrect to convert between different enum classes using
initialisation.
However, it's OK to convert between different enum classes using the
same underlying type using static_cast.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Co-authored-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
