88bf7a8cb4 fix: resolve GitHub workflow warnings (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.blog/changelog/2022-10-11-github-actions-deprecating-save-state-and-set-output-commands/
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Check results for CI and Guix actions (in future PRs? 🤷♂️ )
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 91464dbb85767e27bd26484cf597f7794e450d56901a407864ce9d3880fb15118047ee040f4e4ab19ea2a0a6dc8aaa6239353427f35f9c7500a6df0fdff6fb6f
5a1bef60a03b57de708a1a751bd90b8245fd8b83 test: refactor: remove binascii from test_framework (Zero-1729)
Pull request description:
This PR continues the work started in PR #22593, regarding using the `bytes` built-in module. In this PR specifically, instances of `binascii`'s methods `hexlify`, `unhexlify`, and `a2b_hex` have been replaced with the build-in `bytes` module's `hex` and `fromhex` methods where appropriate to make bytes <-> hex-string conversions consistent across the functional test files and test_framework.
Additionally, certain changes made are based on the following assumption:
```
bytes.hex(data) == binascii.hexlify(data).decode()
bytes.hex(data).encode() == binascii.hexlify(data)
```
Ran the functional tests to ensure behaviour is still consistent and changes didn't break existing tests.
closes#22605
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 5a1bef60a03b57de708a1a751bd90b8245fd8b83 🔢
Tree-SHA512: 8f28076cf0580a0d02a156f3e1e94c9badd3d41c3fbdfb2b87cd8a761dde2c94faa5f4c448d6747b1ccc9111c3ef1a1d7b42a11c806b241fa0410b7529e2445f
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
b65863783f merge bitcoin#27011: Add simulation-based `CCoinsViewCache` fuzzer (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
1d0e410280 merge bitcoin#26999: A few follow-ups to bitcoin#17487 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7d837ea5c5 merge bitcoin#17487: allow write to disk without cache drop (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
2c758f4ba2 merge bitcoin#25571: Make mapBlocksUnknownParent local, and rename it (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
70a91e1d3f merge bitcoin#25349: CBlockIndex/CDiskBlockIndex improvements for safety, consistent behavior (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
eca0a64ea1 merge bitcoin#22564: Move mutable globals cleared in ::UnloadBlockIndex to BlockManager (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
916b3f0041 merge bitcoin#24917: Make BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex private (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e10ca27fa6 merge bitcoin#24299: UnloadBlockIndex and ChainstateManager::Reset thread safety cleanups (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
18aa55be1e merge bitcoin#24177: add missing thread safety lock assertions (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
678e67c505 merge bitcoin#24235: use stronger EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED() (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
edc665c80d merge bitcoin#24103: Replace RecursiveMutex m_cs_chainstate with Mutex, and rename it (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d19ffd613a merge bitcoin#22278: Add LIFETIMEBOUND to CScript where needed (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6097
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6067
* Test failures in `linux64_multiprocess-build` ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550924662)) and `linux64_tsan-test` ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550924666)) do not stem from this PR but are pre-existing failures in `develop` ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550859495), [build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7550859499)). A fix for the build failures has been opened as a separate PR.
## Breaking Changes
None observed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
LGTM, utACK b65863783f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b65863783f
Tree-SHA512: 1a9c3a41617af274db169db47a9c9fce7ba7ce0b2d68aa75617640a55da11a0fa095cb25ce6a2d38f06d3f6a6cc4c08cb4cf82dca4bdc74192e8882fd5f7052f
b9213fa976 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22860: test: Always clear reject reason in IsStandard tx test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
bitcoin backports
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7257e9e7bdc6681fcb810f3b4c4034e8afcccdd6f3a6afe63e329e9d211833d55ce87d41c9c4e06af76d04e2ea234fb9d1ffa98108b94e1eddec43fd027bbadc
fa1b08eb1413d547b5e322f20e6907b2f827a162 test: Always clear reject reason in IsStandard tx test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
For some tests the reject reason wasn't cleared between runs and thus subsequent tests might (theoretically) fail to verify the correct reject reason.
ACKs for top commit:
benthecarman:
ACK fa1b08eb1413d547b5e322f20e6907b2f827a162
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa1b08eb1413d547b5e322f20e6907b2f827a162
Tree-SHA512: fcb727a690f92a4cf06127c302ba464f1e8cb997498e4f7fd9e210d193559b07e6efdb9d5c8a0bef3fe643bdfd5fedd431aaace20978dd49e56b8e770cb9f930
715bc1af66 test: check `masternode winners` before and after mn_rr (UdjinM6)
9d47cd2226 fix: adjust payee predictions after mn_rr activation (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Payment predictions in GUI are wrong when mn_rr is active, `masternode winners` RPC is affected by the same issue too. Actual payments aren't affected.
## What was done?
Adjust calculations, add tests for `masternode winners`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run dash-qt on testnet, check "Next Payment" on "Masternode" tab. Run tests.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 715bc1a
Tree-SHA512: 293c77974bcb50c6f9c51449d7bb12f89ad8db5871cad3a6083fe1951fe77e0deba8de7688b2f600fabe977bdc7390a66a984a6a076be19183c23742e00e27bf
