a0ac15459a0df598e1ee1fd36a3899a129cecaeb doc: Add getrpcinfo release notes (João Barbosa)
251a91c1bf245b3674c2612149382a0f1e18dc98 qa: Add tests for getrpcinfo (João Barbosa)
d0730f5ce475e5a84da7c61fe79bcd6ed24d693e rpc: Add getrpcinfo command (João Barbosa)
068a8fc05f8dbec198bdc3fe46f955d8a5255303 rpc: Track active commands (João Barbosa)
bf4383277d6761cc5b7a91975752c08df829af72 rpc: Remove unused PreCommand signal (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The new `getrpcinfo` command exposes details of the RPC interface. The details can be configuration properties or runtime values/stats.
This can be particular useful to coordinate concurrent functional tests (see #14958 from where this was extracted).
Tree-SHA512: 7292cb6087f4c429973d991aa2b53ffa1327d5a213df7d6ba5fc69b01b2e1a411f6d1609fed9234896293317dab05f65064da48b8f2b4a998eba532591d31882
662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003 Add option to create an encrypted wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `passphrase` argument to `createwallet` which will create a wallet that is encrypted with that passphrase.
This is built on #15226 because it needs to first create an empty wallet, then encrypt the empty wallet and generate new keys that have only been stored in an encrypted state.
ACKs for commit 662d11:
laanwj:
utACK 662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003
jnewbery:
Looks great. utACK 662d1171d9e29964b039ba4c5bc8a2304426c003
Tree-SHA512: a53fc9a0f341eaec1614eb69abcf2d48eb4394bc89041ab69bfc05a63436ed37c65ad586c07fd37dc258ac7c7d5e4f7f93b4191407f5824bbf063b4c50894c4a
7687f7873 [wallet] Support creating a blank wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Alternative (kind of) to #14938
This PR adds a `blank` parameter to the `createwallet` RPC to create a wallet that has no private keys initially. `sethdseed` can then be used to make a clean wallet with a custom seed. `encryptwallet` can also be used to make a wallet that is born encrypted.
Instead of changing the version number as done in #14938, a wallet flag is used to indicate that the wallet should be blank. This flag is set at creation, and then unset when the wallet is no longer blank. A wallet becomes non-blank when a HD seed is set or anything is imported. The main change to create a blank wallet is primarily taken from #14938.
Also with this, the term "blank wallet" is used instead of "empty wallet" to avoid confusion with wallets that have balance which would also be referred to as "empty".
This is built on top of #15225 in order to fix GUI issues.
Tree-SHA512: 824d685e11ac2259a26b5ece99c67a7bda94a570cd921472c464243ee356b7734595ad35cc439b34357135df041ed9cba951e6edac194935c3a55a1dc4fcbdea
42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 [mempool] log correct messages when CPFP fails (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Fixes a logging issue introduced in #15681
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 (+utACK from bluematt that isn't registered because it has no commit id)
Tree-SHA512: ff5f423cc4d22838eea00c5b1d39ceda89cd61474c72f256a97c698eb0ec3f2156a97139f537669376132902c1e3943bf84c356a4b98a9a306b4ec57302c2761
50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced [mempool] Allow one extra single-ancestor transaction per package (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This implements the proposed policy change from [1], which allows
certain classes of contract protocols involving revocation
punishments to use CPFP. Note that some such use-cases may still
want some form of one-deep package relay, though even this alone
may greatly simplify some lightning fee negotiation.
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced -- looked over code again, compared with previous commit, compiles, etc.
sdaftuar:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced
ryanofsky:
utACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced. Changes since last review: adding EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT constant, changing max ancestor size from 1,000,000 to nLimitAncestorSize constant (101,000), fixing test comment and getting rid of unused test node.
Tree-SHA512: b052c2a0f384855572b4579310131897b612201214b5abbb225167224e4f550049e300b471dbf320928652571e92ca2d650050b7cf39ac92b3bc1d2bcd386c1c
fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75 test: Make PORT_MIN in test runner configurable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed when some ports in the port range are used by other processes. Note that simply assigning the ports dynamically does not work:
* We spin up several nodes per test (each node gets its own port)
* We run several tests in parallel
So to avoid nodes from different tests colliding on ports, the port assignment must be deterministic (can not be dynamic).
Fixes: #10869
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75 -- diff looks correct
promag:
ACK fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75.
Tree-SHA512: e79adb015e7de79064e2d14336c38bc9672bd779ad6c52917721897e73f617c39d32c068a369c26670002a6c4ab95a71ef3a6878ebdd9710e02f410e2f7bcd14
96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b Test: Move common function assert_approx() into util.py (fridokus)
Pull request description:
To reduce code duplication, move `assert_approx` into common framework `util.py`.
`assert_approx()` is used in two functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 96299a9
practicalswift:
ACK 96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b -- DRY is good and diff looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b - thanks for contributing 🍻
Tree-SHA512: 8e9d397222c49536c7b3d6d0756cc5af17113e5af8707ac48a500fff1811167fb2e03f3c0445b0b9e80f34935f4d57cfb935c4790f6f5463a32a67df5f736939
fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke)
fa3b9ee8b2280af4bcbcfffff275aaf8dd125929 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
faaee1e39a91b3f603881655d3980c29af09852b test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke)
1111bb91f517838e5b9f778bf6b5a9c8d561e857 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side).
This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times.
Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests.
Historic background:
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2
jonasschnelli:
utACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 - more of less a cleanup PR.
promag:
Tested ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2, ran extended tests.
Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2ad68719415e9c54a981441052da072 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71 test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Headers and block sync should eventually converge to the same result, regardless of whether the peers treat each other as "inbound" or "outbound".
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
Thus remove the `connect_nodes_bi` workaround from the rpc_invalidateblock test.
Conveniently, this also closes#16453. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16444#issuecomment-514801708 for rationale
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71
Tree-SHA512: b3614c66a205823df73f64d19cacfbec269beb5db52ff79004d746e17d7c0dfb43ab9785fdddc97e2a76fe76286c8c605b34df3dda4a2bf5be035f01169ae89a
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
* test: Add BRR and DAT unit tests
* test: Drop feature_block_reward_reallocation.py
* change copyright
* remove trivially removable includes
* use constexpr, remove empty statement
* Don't use BOOST_ASSERT, fix bug?
Not sure if this was a bug, as it does an assignment. If this isn't a bug please add a comment / explanation
```
BOOST_ASSERT(::ChainActive().Tip()->nVersion = 536870912);
```
* deduplicate all the things (also test all activation periods)
* use try_emplace, and remove some tempararies
* update threshold to be inline with dynamic
* explicitly include map, vector, remove now unneeded base58.h
* remove unused param, and replace raw loop with range loop
* re: Don't use BOOST_ASSERT, fix bug?
* Make TestChain<smth>Setup in dynamic_activation_thresholds_tests more general
* Specify min level activation tests correctly
Co-authored-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
510c6532ba Extract ParseDescriptorRange (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and
to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
ACKs for commit 510c65:
meshcollider:
Oh apologies, yes. Thanks :) utACK 510c6532ba
MarcoFalke:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
sipa:
utACK 510c6532bae9abc5beda1c126c945923a64680cb
Tree-SHA512: b1f0792bfaa163890a20654a0fc2c4c4a996659916bf5f4a495662436b39326692a1a0c825caafd859e48c05f5dd1865c4f7c28092be5074edda3c94f94f9f8b
ca253f6ebf Make deriveaddresses use stop/[start,stop] notation for ranges (Pieter Wuille)
1675b7ce55 Use stop/[start,stop] notation in importmulti desc range (Pieter Wuille)
4566011631 Add support for stop/[start,stop] ranges to scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
6b9f45e81b Support ranges arguments in RPC help (Pieter Wuille)
7aa6a8aefb Add ParseRange function to parse args of the form int/[int,int] (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This introduces a consistent notation for RPC arguments in `scantxoutset`, `importmulti`, and `deriveaddresses`, either:
* `"range" : int` to just specify the end of the range
* `"range" : [int,int]` to specify both the begin and the end of the range.
For `scantxoutset`, this is a backward compatible new feature. For the two other RPCs, it's an incompatible change, but neither of them has been in a release so far. Because of that non-released reason, this only makes sense in 0.18, in my opinion.
I suggest this as an alternative to #15496, which only makes `deriveaddresses` compatible with `importmulti`, but not with the existing `scantxoutset` RPC. I also think `[int,int]` is more convenient than `{"start":int,"stop":int}`.
I realize this is technically a feature added to `scantxoutset` after the feature freeze. If desired, I'll drop the `scantxoutset` changes.
Tree-SHA512: 1cbebb90cf34f106786dbcec7afbf3f43fb8b7e46cc7e6763faf1bc1babf12375a1b3c3cf86ee83c21ed2171d99b5a2f60331850bc613db25538c38b6a056676
* instantsend: Avoid writing IS locks for unknown txes
* instantsend: Allow a competing tx into mempool if there is an islock waiting for it
* use try_emplace
* Hold cs_main while calling ResetBlockFailureFlags
fa8489a15511f61a372473927e73c34692bbec23 test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx (MarcoFalke)
77770d95e2838d7665fa8f621e9e83d79f9b3196 test: Properly serialize BIP34 coinbase height (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This adds a test for BIP30 to check that duplicate txs can exist in the blockchain given the first one was completely spent when the second one is added. (Requested by ajtowns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16333#issuecomment-508604071)
We can not add a test that a later duplicate tx overwrites a previous one, because BIP30 is always enforced on regtest. If someone feels strongly about such a test, some Bitcoin Core code would have to be modified, which can be done in a follow up pull request.
Also, add a commit to fix the BIP34 test failures reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14633#issue-227712540
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa8489a15511f61a372473927e73c34692bbec23
Tree-SHA512: c707d0bdc93937263876b603425b53322a2a9f9ec3f50716ae2fa9de8ddc644beb22b26c1bfde7f4aab102633e096b354ef380db919176bd2cb44a2828f884aa
d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876 [test] walletcreatefundedpsbt: check RBF is disabled when -walletrbf=0 (Sjors Provoost)
9ed062b5685eb6227d694572cb0f7bfbcc151b36 [doc] rpc: remove "fallback to" from RBF default help (Sjors Provoost)
4fcb698bc2bb74171cd3a14b94f9882d8e19e9fb [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: use wallet default RBF (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The `walletcreatefundedpsbt` RPC call currently ignores `-walletrbf` and defaults to not use RBF. This PR fixes that.
This PR also replaces UniValue in `ConstructTransaction` with a `bool` in preparation of moving this helper method out of the RPC codebase entirely. This may be a bit overkill, but does slightly simplify it.
Fixes#15878
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876
l2a5b1:
re-ACK d6b3640
MarcoFalke:
ACK d6b3640ac732f6f66a8cb6761084d1beecc8a876
Tree-SHA512: 55b9bccd1ef36b54f6b34793017dc0721103099ad3761b3b04862291ee13d6915915d4dbb1a8567924fa56e5e95dfe10eec070e06701610e70c87f8ea92b2a00
fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2 test: Remove incorrect and unused try-block in assert_debug_log (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This try block has accidentally been added by me in fa3e9f7627784ee00980590e5bf044a0e1249999.
It was unused all the time, but commit 6011c9d72d1df5c2cd09de6f85c21eb4f7eb1ba8 added a `return` in the finally block, muting all exceptions.
This can be tested by adding an `assert False` after any `with ...assert_debug_log...:` line.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2
ryanofsky:
utACK fae91a09c453a9a95c382df765bd71e54698d5b2. I didn't know returning inside a `finally` block would cancel pending exceptions or return values, but I guess this makes sense and is a good thing to be aware of.
Tree-SHA512: 47ed0165062060e9af055a3e92f1a529cd41d00476bfad64e3cd141ae084d22f926a343bb1257717e164e15459a59ab66aed198c95d18bf780d8cb0b76aa3298
6011c9d72d1df5c2cd09de6f85c21eb4f7eb1ba8 QA: fix rpc_setban.py race (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The new `rpc_setban.py` test failes regularly on CIs due to a race between injecting the ban and testing the log "on the other side".
The problem is, that the test immediately after the `addnode` command on node0 checks for the `dropped (banned)` entry on node1 (without giving some time).
Adding a 2 seconds sleep seems to solve the race (I guess there is no better event-driven delay).
Example of a failed test: https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?ansilog=bf743910-103f-4b54-9a97-960c471061bd.log#l2906
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 680f8ea3e5ddb07e93f824f1aeff4a459e25e6c14715a39fc7670e50506d7cf25925348672c5c2d8ba3e1243ccf5effbc2456bcd094fb96868349f8d26e008f1
9f9db39041 QA/mininode: Send all headers upfront in send_blocks_and_test to avoid sending an unconnected one (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
While this doesn't currently trigger any problems, the network protocol does expect headers to be sent connectable in normal circumstances, and if too many are sent out of order will disconnect the peer.
ACKs for commit 9f9db3:
Tree-SHA512: 25b88718e4ba3d31aed2de7ece23fab9a0737fd6536c5e618ea8eb5a3a217dab0dffaebc4892df7993bcea7efb7c4fb5085fabebe99535b8f7fdde3c19df54ff
fa08c5cb99 test_runner: Move pruning back to extended (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts fafb55e2c2b257efd4e584f72adf62401c01d573, since the test is still too slow to run with asan enabled on a network hdd
ACKs for commit fa08c5:
jnewbery:
utACK fa08c5cb993f07fd4309f2a6bd9ef4696f07e24c
jonasschnelli:
utACK fa08c5cb993f07fd4309f2a6bd9ef4696f07e24c
Tree-SHA512: de16786b9d507a72210805c3e9eef360e5fc3d4bc3a81f7175b6cc70d1bc426cde7ac97bc0d1a0d4e0813067e1e251c2dd49256552cc6b52446b475251b7c32b
f402012cc fixup: Fix prunning test (João Barbosa)
97f517dd8 Fix RPC/pruneblockchain returned prune height (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The help of `pruneblockchain` tells us that the return value is `Height of the last block pruned.`,... but the implementation naively returns the provided input `height` and therefore not respecting that pruning can't be done on all possible blockheight due to the fact that we only prune complete blockfiles (which combine multiple blocks).
This fixes the return value to actually return the correct prune height.
ACKs for commit f40201:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f402012ccfc596d7d94851dabbf386c278ff5335
Tree-SHA512: 88c910030ffb83196663e5ebebc29d036fcdbbb2ab266e4538991867924a61bacd8361c1fbf294a0ea7e02347ae183d792f10a10b8f6187e8a4c4c6e4124d7e6
e91f0a7af2 doc: Remove travis badge from readme (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The readme(s) are shipped in the released source-code archive, in which case the travis badge is useless since it doesn't link to the travis result of the correct commit/tag/branch. GitHub embeds the correct links for each tag or commit that ci ran on, so we don't need this link in the readme.
ACKs for commit e91f0a:
hebasto:
ACK e91f0a7af2aec7d924f00da25c69d8f46e0dd33d
Tree-SHA512: 860435a58b38a9bd0bc62a1e74b3a63c138c9a2f09008a090d5ecc7fd86fa908d2e5eda41d16606507a238d9488fa5323405364a9556b670684a2e4838aead2d
b67978529a Add comments to Python ECDSA implementation (John Newbery)
8c7b9324ca Pure python EC (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This removes the dependency on OpenSSL for the interaction tests, by providing a pure-Python
toy implementation of secp256k1.
ACKs for commit b67978:
jnewbery:
utACK b67978529ad02fc2665f2362418dc53db2e25e17
Tree-SHA512: 181445eb08b316c46937b80dc10aa50d103ab1fdddaf834896c0ea22204889f7b13fd33cbcbd00ddba15f7e4686fe0d9f8e8bb4c0ad0e9587490c90be83966dc
3c3e31c3a4 [tests] Add wallet-tool test (João Barbosa)
49d2374acf [tools] Add wallet inspection and modification tool (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Adds an offline tool `bitcoin-wallet-tool` for wallet creation and maintenance.
Currently this tool can create a new wallet file, display information on an existing wallet, and run the salvage and zapwallettxes maintenance tasks on an existing wallet. It can later be extended to support other common wallet maintenance tasks.
Doing wallet maintenance tasks in an offline tool makes much more sense (and is potentially safer) than having to spin up a full node.
Tree-SHA512: 75a28b8a58858d9d76c7532db40eacdefc5714ea5aab536fb1dc9756e2f7d750d69d68d59c50a68e633ce38fb5b8c3e3d4880db30fe01561e07ce58d42bceb2b
