9760293ce632e09f0175368ebf0c8502ac9b10d4 wallet: Fix for exported confirmation field in payment to self transactions (Ben Carman)
Pull request description:
Closes#3455
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 9760293ce632e09f0175368ebf0c8502ac9b10d4
Tree-SHA512: 8207768771ad787f716b966c4aa7aeef2da8a602e32e3510e41c7b49ec5ec679a3835d248be5016d4b37764f9914846f7c41c11cf48cddb617cb7ef831318fd7
e8fa0a3d2025509fcddc59fc618e91371542cf87 Fix WSL file locking by using flock instead of fcntl (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Fixes#18622
A bug in WSL means that fcntl does not exclusively lock files, allowing multiple instances of bitcoin to use the same datadir. If we instead use flock, it works correctly. Passes Travis, but testing on some OS variety would be sensible.
From what I can tell, flock and fcntl don't work with each other on linux, so it would still be possible to run a node with this code change and a node before it with the same datadir (this isn't true for Mac/FreeBSD). flock also doesn't support NFS on MacOS and linux<2.6.12 while fcntl did. See here for example: https://gavv.github.io/articles/file-locks/
If changing to flock for all systems is inadvisable, it would also be possible to just detect WSL and use flock when on that platform to avoid the bug.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e8fa0a3d2025509fcddc59fc618e91371542cf87
Tree-SHA512: ca1009e171970101f1dc2332c5e998717aee00eebc80bb586b826927a74bd0d4c94712e46d1396821bc30533d76deac391b6e1c406c406865661f57fa062c702
4c825792dd9f4eaf4936c3e376ac7a5c177528e2 Remove outdated comment about DER encoding (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
This comment got me confused about the status of BIP66 (Thanks jnewbery for explaining)
The comment was added in: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3843
But in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5713 strict DER encoding was enforced in consensus,
and is now it's buried and enforced by the height of the block here: 4af01b37d4/src/validation.cpp (L1889)
P.S. This is also quite confusing: 4af01b37d4/src/validation.cpp (L1560-L1563) But seems to be intentional: 4af01b37d4/src/validation.cpp (L1510-L1511)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 4c825792dd9f4eaf4936c3e376ac7a5c177528e2
Tree-SHA512: 7afbbae84ed4ecfaa0a273ae024b14f2b7ffe65307f078086fe0b5b645c57722bc2952fb15d167d9e4fa5b052d1d0ac6e5e33f57e8fc881c0ea611d352bccc1e
69bfcac27a83440092bc6e61904ded910ed4baf4 gui: update Qt base translations for macOS release (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These haven't been updated since their addition, so this updates the list that
controls which qt base translations are bundled with the macOS binary, to all the
languages that are available with qt 5.9.8.
This could probably be improved in some way, however qt updates are infrequent,
and I didn't want to spend any more time looking at this. Also given that no-one
seems to have noticed and/or reported this it wouldn't seem high-priority.
Could be backported to 0.20.1.
Master:
This PR:
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 69bfcac27a83440092bc6e61904ded910ed4baf4, tested on macOS 10.15.
Tree-SHA512: df142fb16097deb514e72e005b73aafc4eb4ff0c17e423ba5040a3ec6874020a733e1c5259a88923580e71ef73c16222aed28f482b8c270a544a85b745a7b327
fa243be1dc49385fff847f8a784c7a9c9f07c939 log: Remove "No rpcpassword set" from logs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
rpcpassword is deprecated and not recommended anymore. So remove it from the logs, which indicate that an rpcpassword should be set and cause confusion. See #18998.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa243be1dc49385fff847f8a784c7a9c9f07c939. New log message makes more sense
elichai:
Re Code Review ACK (Checked the diff) fa243be1dc49385fff847f8a784c7a9c9f07c939
Tree-SHA512: de3e0800a204b15a59a59a7e6f345013ee9d38e8c5d0c9a94d6142780faa9cce672ed358c7571f53c1eb843bf5afb0b7bcbfd289d3b9e2e0bf8ff2fd361e98a9
8d306862ef077f2a71931372dd6a2efa05188c84 ci: Add fuzzbuzz integration (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzbuzz integration.
Just like #15338 enabled optional FreeBSD building via Cirrus CI (`.cirrus.yml`) this PR adds optional fuzzing via fuzzbuzz (`.fuzzbuzz.yml`).
Having this merged makes is easier for people to fuzz Bitcoin Core (via their forked repos) using their fuzzbuzz account and then hopefully submit coverage increasing corpus additions upstreams to to https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets.
Historically it has been mostly been me and MarcoFalke who submit test cases to `qa-assets`, but with this change hopefully more people will join the hunt for coverage increasing fuzzing inputs :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: c7d8e354996c673da36cc9add260383c82a5325bfaa7ce6141ad6cd6b7d6adf3a6c900ea2db17fb70147b3625fa7f6a1ff8ba813aeaa299f316d8f6cabb3a65c
0c63f808542ba02fc41aa90b1d96e9123f16d8ad build: Suppress -Wdeprecated-copy warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Tomorrow, on Apr 23 the Ubuntu 20.04 release is expected. It packaged with Qt 5.12 LTS that has a nasty peculiarity to cause modern compilers, including Clang 10.0 and GCC 9.3, to emit spammy `-Wdeprecated-copy` warnings (#15822, #18419).
This PR suppress such warnings _temporarily_, until the [upstream is fixed](https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/272258).
Here are some affected systems (with system packages):
- Ubuntu 20.04 LTS + Qt 5.12.8 LTS + { Clang 10.0 | GCC 9.3 }
- Fedora 32 + Qt 5.13.2 + Clang 10.0
Reference: [QTBUG-75210](https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-75210)
Also see **fanquake**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18738#issuecomment-622956100).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0c63f808542ba02fc41aa90b1d96e9123f16d8ad seems fine to disable this warning for the 0.21.0 release temporarily and then enable it for 0.22.0, when boost is removed.
fanquake:
ACK 0c63f808542ba02fc41aa90b1d96e9123f16d8ad - I think it's ok to suppress these for now, given that `-Wdeprecated-copy` is enabled (via `-Wextra`) in GCC 9 and Clang 10. The Qt output is pretty noisy, and there's a few warnings from Boost as well.
Tree-SHA512: 7064a3272bc9eae00b73a16c421ac58be148f374cbef87320e8f092f52761f6e98166eff60346b70867f8a69a9698a79455dc16b42d92f8fbe7c56519571ac08
e8123eae40eb264bbb71007d0eb074901f0e2fe5 gui: Fix itemWalletAddress leak when not tree mode (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Taken from #17457, the first commit is a similar to 88a94f7bb8ba2b0257315d70717f9af928ca6561 but for test binary, and the second commit fixes a leak where `CCoinControlWidgetItem` are unnecessarily created and leaked.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK e8123eae40eb264bbb71007d0eb074901f0e2fe5
hebasto:
ACK e8123eae40eb264bbb71007d0eb074901f0e2fe5, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 8b43cb29de103842ce5f048de51222919540d3212d2873c16731145e856178644041924ad0e9a58c2ff08f209a9b4ac26dc9965289eb719da233c0984f93631e
a029805f57fa9a4ab9867c0d1e865675d57537c7 build: remove -Qunused-arguments workaround for clang + ccache (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This was added in 386efb7695 to address spammy Clang warnings when building with ccache.
The issue was addressed in [ccache 3.2](https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8118), and from a look at most major distros, it's only Debian Jessie that has a version of ccache older than that ([3.1](https://packages.debian.org/jessie/ccache)).
Therefore I think it's acceptable to drop this workaround, and re-enable warnings for unused driver arguments (when compiling using Clang and ccache).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK a029805f57fa9a4ab9867c0d1e865675d57537c7.
vasild:
utACK a029805f57fa9a4ab9867c0d1e865675d57537c7
Tree-SHA512: f887b9bd12f9c1c8d209943b86e8dafe33cfd1572912f2cafabe08ffe403973e48f0f7289280a8c6db9263c57aad43fbd4bb72f42db762eb090f3b1ef0538f43
f85203097f78d9daa1d35c4097a80beab31da2a4 lockedpool: avoid sensitive data in core files (FreeBSD) (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
This is a followup to
23991ee53 / https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15600
to also use madvise(2) on FreeBSD to avoid sensitive data allocated
with secure_allocator ending up in core files in addition to preventing
it from going to the swap.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK f85203097f78d9daa1d35c4097a80beab31da2a4 if someone verifies this works as intended on *BSD.
laanwj:
ACK f85203097f78d9daa1d35c4097a80beab31da2a4
practicalswift:
Code-review ACK f85203097f78d9daa1d35c4097a80beab31da2a4 assuming a reviewer with FreeBSD access verifies that the PR goal is achieved :)
Tree-SHA512: 2e6d4ab6a9fbe18732c8ba530eacc17f58128c97140758b80c905b5b838922a2bcaa5f9abc45ab69d5a1a2baa0cba322f006048b60a877228e089c7e64dadd2a
25bc17fceb08ee9625c5e09e2579117ec6f7a1c5 refactor: rpc: Remove vector copy from listtransactions (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Current approach
- copy accumulated `ret` vector to `arrTmp`
- drop unnecessary elements from `arrTmp`
- reverse `arrTmp`
- clear `ret`
- copy `arrTmp` to the `ret`
New approach
- create a vector from the accumulated `ret` with just the necessary elements already reversed
- copy it to the result
This PR doesn't change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 25bc17fceb08ee9625c5e09e2579117ec6f7a1c5. Just comment and commit message tweaks since last review
Tree-SHA512: 87906561e3accdbdb0f4a8194cbcd76ea53ae53d0ce135b90bc54a5f77e300b14ef08505e7daf1fe52426f135442a743da5a027416a769bd454922357cebe7c0
ac57859e53167f4ff3da467b616b0902c93701a9 qt: Fix deprecated QCharRef usage (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From Qt docs:
- [`QKeyEvent::text()`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qkeyevent.html#text):
> Return values when modifier keys such as Shift, Control, Alt, and Meta are pressed differ among platforms and could return an empty string.
- [`QString::operator[]()`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#operator-5b-5d):
> **Note:** Before Qt 5.14 it was possible to use this operator to access a character at an out-of-bounds position in the string, and then assign to such a position, causing the string to be automatically resized. Furthermore, assigning a value to the returned `QCharRef` would cause a detach of the string, even if the string has been copied in the meanwhile (and the `QCharRef` kept alive while the copy was taken). These behaviors are deprecated, and will be changed in a future version of Qt.
Since Qt 5.14 this causes a `QCharRef` warning if any modifier key is pressed while the splashscreen is still displayed.
Fix#18080.
Note: Ctrl+Q will also close the spashscreen now.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK ac57859e53167f4ff3da467b616b0902c93701a9
Tree-SHA512: a7e5559410bd05c406007ab0243f458b82d434b0543276ed331254c8d7a6b1aaa54d0b406f799b830859294975004380160f8af04ba403d3bf185d51e6784f54
2af3e16ca917acd85c2d4f709f6d486519d6af0d Qt: pass clientmodel changes from walletframe to walletviews (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Fixes#18090
We currently don't pass `clientmodel` changes from the `walletframe` to the `walletviews` leading to possible invalid access during shutdown because all walletviews miss the nullifying of the clientmodel.
TODO: needs investigation if this is should be backported.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Good catch, code review ACK 2af3e16ca917acd85c2d4f709f6d486519d6af0d
Tree-SHA512: f8c0a114f01deac07fb311112d144f3bfc1c1882dd19e8742b372dd597d7a5d59cd0af99fc50494de2334cad98d6701675317474e40fe8820d04c058aeca1b75
b3c4d9bac6910f6c28f6008c5ca7064a315fd2a5 test: rename test suite name "tx_validationcache_tests" to match filename (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Quoting `src/test/README.md`, '`Adding test cases`':
> "The file naming convention is `<source_filename>_tests.cpp`
> and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite
> called `<source_filename>_tests`."
Currently the unit test source file `txvalidationcache_tests.cpp` contains a unit test suite with the name `tx_validationcache_tests`, which is fixed by this PR. The following shell script shows that this is the only mismatch and for all other unit test source files the test suite names are correct:
```
#!/bin/bash
shopt -s globstar
for test_full_filename in **/*_tests.cpp; do
test_name_file=`basename $test_full_filename .cpp`
test_name_suite=`sed -n "s/^.*TEST_SUITE(\(.*_tests\).*$/\1/p" $test_full_filename`
if [ $test_name_file != $test_name_suite ]; then
echo "TestFilename: $test_name_file != TestSuitname: $test_name_suite"
fi
done
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK b3c4d9bac6910f6c28f6008c5ca7064a315fd2a5 -- expected naming is better than unexpected naming :)
kristapsk:
ACK b3c4d9bac6910f6c28f6008c5ca7064a315fd2a5
Tree-SHA512: 29d409b1eb22057ee2cc407508e2580d2bc03f412401df11b8ecf77be5ada6bda8f7d2cb5338c5e079490fa12242c1fd6230a09e47252c1b0d9fe535a828ca4c
1a638e11055743ac089973b92f46c376466fe621 gui: Shortcut to close ModalOverlay (Emil Engler)
Pull request description:
This adds the shortcut `Esc` to hide the ModalOverlay.
The motivation is that it is annoying to always move the cursor to "Hide" when quickly testing something in the GUI with an outdated chain.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 1a638e11055743ac089973b92f46c376466fe621. Agree with @promag, Esc feels more natural than Enter here.
jonasschnelli:
ACK 1a638e11055743ac089973b92f46c376466fe621
Tree-SHA512: ea764349ec145ce9a34cbc66c3ac0eace9233a3fb3e9c22694a77882478afa22d4e686ce2c1d7b3938f6769f96ba995577b0216ba9d98954dcf3e55d2187f2e0
a5a2654bbc43b5c208418872e5d4c0acbadda5de test: add missing #include to fix compiler errors (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
I believe this fixes AppVeyor errors in master. Will close if that is not the case.
Closes#17976
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a5a2654bbc43b5c208418872e5d4c0acbadda5de - glad the fix turned out to be this simple.
Tree-SHA512: 8fed8c2050d0f435e7ed6db1c2927d5daccc3540c6cf9e57e644d0931a740359550a5270201c893f40200960101f11cd039d807d4ed0190f1e0c674f86fd7290
8313fa8e8112e429e104b7e7fd48e5e6e359b82e gui: Set CConnman byte counters earlier to avoid uninitialized reads (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Initialize CConnman byte counters during construction, so GetTotalBytesRecv() and GetTotalBytesSent() methods don't return garbage before Start() is called.
Change shouldn't have any effect outside of the GUI. It just fixes a race condition during a qt test that was observed on travis: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/634989685
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8313fa8e8112e429e104b7e7fd48e5e6e359b82e
promag:
ACK 8313fa8e8112e429e104b7e7fd48e5e6e359b82e.
Tree-SHA512: 97c246da4e28e6e0b48f685b840f96746ad75c4b157a692201c6c4702db328a88ead8507d8e1b4e608aa1882513174ec60cf3977c31b7a9d76678cc9f49b45f8
8b2f471a1bff753cc4df29805ef38c3623f64f6e qa: Fix double-negative arg test (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Commit 67518f7cc61bf59ddfa0fd7c8dbbdec3653b9556 tests do not catch that a pointer is returned instead of a value.
This PR makes test to not accept trailing characters after 0.
From [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-01-07.html#l-358):
> \<hebasto\> ryanofsky: hmm, why test/functional/feature_config_args.py passed on 67518f7cc61bf59ddfa0fd7c8dbbdec3653b9556 ?
> \<hebasto\> I see now: test is broken.
> \<ryanofsky\> test should be unaffected by that change, do you see a break somewhere?
> \<hebasto\> yes: "-connect=0x7fff50369968" != "-connect=0"
> ...
> \<ryanofsky\> Oh I see how that would happen, it should not be a problem in the current PR.
> \<hebasto\> going to submit a pr to fix test
> \<ryanofsky\> in the commit you mentioned, value is a pointer to a string, and it was printing the pointer address instead of the string on: LogPrintf("Warning: parsed potentially confusing double-negative -%s=%s\n", key, value);
> \<hebasto\> correct
> \<ryanofsky\> oh I see, test could be fixed to more robust and not accept trailing characters after 0
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8b2f471a1bff753cc4df29805ef38c3623f64f6e. I don't know how you found this but it's a nice catch! This change should make the test more reliable.
Tree-SHA512: 454b3d4415771d353a2da766f6ae6e0bfae7bdf485aaa7bfdd323595282356eeaf3f40e556b39f753bc35f578cbe9684368887eef2d63c5d7f0d7d9fa971697a
529d332fbfe633d60845a97e1a06f552bd63d0d4 test: add IsRFC2544 tests (Mark Tyneway)
419ef3b7cc04e3ab26252d7024da847dfd5ab1a3 CNetAddr: fix IsRFC2544 comment (Mark Tyneway)
Pull request description:
The comment describing the functionality of `CNetAddr::IsRFC2544` is incorrect.
46d6930f8c/src/netaddress.h (L57)
It should actually read `198.18.0.0/15` based on [RFC 3330](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3330):
```
198.18.0.0/15 - This block has been allocated for use in benchmark
tests of network interconnect devices. Its use is documented in
[RFC2544].
```
See [RFC 2544](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2544) here.
See the implementation here:
47d981e827/src/netaddress.cpp (L142-L145)
This PR also adds tests for the minimum and maximum values that are valid RFC 2544 addresses.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 529d332fbfe633d60845a97e1a06f552bd63d0d4
laanwj:
ACK 529d332fbfe633d60845a97e1a06f552bd63d0d4
promag:
ACK 529d332fbfe633d60845a97e1a06f552bd63d0d4, nit could squash.
jonatack:
ACK 529d332fbfe633d60845a97e1a06f552bd63d0d4
Tree-SHA512: 954a9582856d77564e0ea5fd2e3d287d0cfc4ecfe0588115692d01005e8ca7ad8ab20ff390ded867dc91af2bfb758d4e73a336e6c0b7798846c30a6d69b8ae3d
d8daa8f3711909223b117b8faa82daca87fc942d pubkey: Assert CPubKey's ECCVerifyHandle precondition (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Assert `CPubKey`'s `ECCVerifyHandle` precondition.
This makes it more clear for fuzzing harness writers and others that `ECCVerifyHandle` is expected to be held when interacting with `CPubKey`.
Related PR #17274.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK d8daa8f3711909223b117b8faa82daca87fc942d
Tree-SHA512: 9e74086599799dc9b5c3fb8357445b662e5bf896d826af63d6d6b6ddb616612966f3bb5de3bd3ae0e692c47de85672f64b8ab6d3a1c45899dc25ba46990b5ec7
76303f65f92a0fbe9a90c0e807554a6daa860636 test: add unit test for non-standard txs with wrong nVersion (Dominik Spicher)
Pull request description:
Takes care of one of the missing cases of #17394: nVersion must be within the allowed range.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 76303f65f9
Tree-SHA512: 94464f781cf70a5616f7cea2014ae0a97a338c34411cc989c60389de2ce00368374811db78c919bda30e0ebf341fb830998a5e97c124dd8afc8feb726cedfd3a
70ed2ab7ef9e7ebf56f77b7c410a345ff455938f Add unit test for DB creation with unicode path (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
An issue arose when attempting to switch back to the main repo version of leveldb when the bitcoin data directory uses a unicode path. The leveldb windows file IO wrapper was using the *A ANSI win32 calls instead of the Unicode *W ones. This unit test will catch if the path created by leveldb doesn't match what we're expecting. For more info see https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/755.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 70ed2ab7ef9e7ebf56f77b7c410a345ff455938f
Tree-SHA512: fc6dbd3aa26a439016e63e8d4d931f218ce99094fc7887a13b54562ad4133047020288ecbcd622a8309f422ee1eda5df50bcb8c8e44442af36ed57b22c069004
93352d261fa4e1518a4f006de157ff5a2fc4c819 qt: Use proper class for Ui::ReceiveCoinsDialog (Hennadii Stepanov)
87819046432a24fa8a7ec5c115eae4df0d281245 qt: Fix class name of Ui::ModalOverlay (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Use proper classes for:
- `Ui::ModalOverlay` to remove `<customwidget>` entry
- `Ui::ReceiveCoinsDialog` to be consistent with the code base
This PR does not change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 93352d261fa4e1518a4f006de157ff5a2fc4c819 - ran this on top of master and tested the modal overlay on initial mainnet sync.
laanwj:
code review ACK 93352d261fa4e1518a4f006de157ff5a2fc4c819
Tree-SHA512: faeed8e86dbf5355505defcdb7e1db07d6a6005ee5eb07367b00f6aa122dd8ad34f8372d4bae7b29c0eac87b538a33157e19328be2876135e8a6376a3197f1bc
8f2d7737cc236b6122f30e31856eb3181960fba1 test: add functional test for non-standard txs with too large scriptSig (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing functional test of issue #17394 (counterpart to unit test in PR #17480, Commit 5e8a56348b): A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason `"scriptsig-size"` if any of the inputs' scriptSig is larger than 1650 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8f2d7737cc236b6122f30e31856eb3181960fba1
instagibbs:
ACK 8f2d7737cc
Tree-SHA512: 7a45b8a4181158be3e3b91756783ddf032f132ca8780dc35fac91b2df2149268f784d28ac56005135c4d86a357c57805c5a54b8155f0d049932844b18dc03992
478c11dde326e2ff0480c14f76f9f6b52a7bdfd0 Correct scripted-diff example link (Yahia Chiheb)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 478c11dde326e2ff0480c14f76f9f6b52a7bdfd0
Tree-SHA512: 3bc741a79db9bd7abb17ef11f697b768565ec01303a5823ee6a7d8dfa6e888a99a15e9eda69f97a912abc3fd56a54f698f9a580596511bc9bcf62a6870b273f6
4928a995e9799c6c7ea84fa1efc4fef5b2ff7683 [doc] fix git add argument (Michael Polzer)
Pull request description:
[`A`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-add#Documentation/git-add.txt--A) is the correct flag.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 4928a995e9799c6c7ea84fa1efc4fef5b2ff7683 - checked that [`A`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-add#Documentation/git-add.txt--A) and not `a` is the correct flag.
Tree-SHA512: 7e656ca9688b04ad2ef577aa1847799a34a377f5e6dfe4fd052a95d3dd98798dc10957e7f54164900ac1271f05e788ec4861026f53b910e369b0845532387cf4
5b59a19731827398aa32754d1f327178247d3199 Update merkle.cpp (4d55397500)
Pull request description:
Change comment from `The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given time
is odd`, to ` The reason is that if the number of hashes in the list at a given level
is odd` (to be a bit more precise: replacing `time` with `level`)
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
* Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
changes are usually rejected.
-->
<!--
Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.
-->
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5b59a19731827398aa32754d1f327178247d3199
instagibbs:
ACK 5b59a19731
Tree-SHA512: 30d29b9855b30de8b54033ca4884cfb5bf8ab9e52cf61da237abba0e15ebff947c65f8ba82175694bc60ee0d54f940a098cadcb0404d3c3bcf577006ab0561a5
2a6bce482c13cff37c1af00231265de4656a454b doc: Add a note about backporting (Carnhof Daki)
Pull request description:
See laanwj's comment in #17158https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17158#issuecomment-542627090
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ac5248a796050ce1a5bd0718955f941f6a3c025e192599948f12566eb55296079404b999676b9a2c8fe10616fc8334698dfa415af0fb4db6c98038d52218af1f
582e66b6e75d58033987a7b0474226cfdd724ce0 doc: Added regtest config for linearize script (Gr0kchain)
Pull request description:
Updated the example-linearize.cfg file to include support for the regtest chain network config which is used by the ./linearize-data.py
Problem:
Without the regtest magic, genesis hash and path config, the `linearize-data.py` script cannot generate a bootstrap.dat file.
Example:
./linearize-data.py ./linearize.cfg
Read 102 hashes
Genesis block not found in hashlist
Solution:
Added netmagic, genesis and input example parameters to file.
Resolution
1. Starting bitcoind in regtest mode
2. bitcoin-cli generatetoaddress 101 $(bitcoin-cli getnewaddress)
3. ./linearize-hashes.py ./linearize.cfg > ./hashlist.txt
4. ./linearize-data.py ./linearize.cfg
```
$ ./linearize-data.py ./linearize.cfg
Read 102 hashes
Input file /Users/gr0kchain/.bitcoin/regtest/blocks/blk00000.dat
Output file /Users/gr0kchain/Downloads/bootstrap.dat
Done (102 blocks written)
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 582e66b6e75d58033987a7b0474226cfdd724ce0
Tree-SHA512: 699e92e740e68e2e5190ba37538efbbe3e4d4e725ebd6af704a0cf5517683b691754f7ea097bf840845d2b53b793c63258d406e9bd37922db810cf58bed053c3
6c223152238d2e818e38357b03f38a4dbe9de016 build: add additional attributes to Win installer (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #17170.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 6c223152238d2e818e38357b03f38a4dbe9de016, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: d2ff2006b8df6a34b3a16270d3eb895b03cf6b3ca69404bc39adeb7d5e3b896ddab6ba831566dc966d8bdfba3f57ddf325762cddf3ad76d1427971d1bcc68255
317fb96de9c6257972f1213b4ef2c3fe87dde99f Add search for first blk file with pruned node (Rjected)
Pull request description:
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
* Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
changes are usually rejected.
-->
When bitcoind is running in pruned mode, producing a hashlist with `./linearize-hashes.py linearize.cfg > hashlist.txt` and then executing `linearize-data.py linearize.cfg` will produce:
```
Read 313001 hashes
Input file /home/dan/.bitcoin/blocks/blk00000.dat
Premature end of block data
```
This happens because `linearize-data` starts by attempting to process `blk00000.dat` regardless of whether or not `blk00000.dat` actually exists - this may not be the case if working with a pruned node.
This PR adds a function which finds the first block file that does exist, and calls that function when the `BlockDataCopier` is initialized.
This is a refactor of #16431.
<!--
Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.
-->
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 317fb96de9c6257972f1213b4ef2c3fe87dde99f
laanwj:
Code review ACK 317fb96de9c6257972f1213b4ef2c3fe87dde99f
theStack:
Code review ACK 317fb96de9
Tree-SHA512: fc8014282df6cfe7b267e64db8ce7d82b86b758c302fbfea4a3c39b62d93512f5c2e31a0de4e9c5ec18fc0268c917f011257d37b45afaef6033eec90e4aa585f
0661a3c4a6ac7e9aa24812dcd1c3ca9053248aff build: Add default configure cache to .gitignore (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Ref: [Autoconf - 7.4.2 Cache Files](https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/autoconf.html#Cache-Files)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 0661a3c4a6ac7e9aa24812dcd1c3ca9053248aff - sure; going to merge this. However lets not start adding every file that might occur from using any autoconf option to our .gitignore..
Tree-SHA512: 8be8fdd7fda35ae190c1613e5b3ac4860d6f9ec08f06b66b1278be26e11a1616ec781e0b88d0761690c99600b4de2306c01dd9798f9143531ddacb373e3fc677
6094222de7820d235e6e8c66e589aa71db08c077 use preferred shebang approach for documentation (hackerrdave)
Pull request description:
Documentation update to use recommended shebang approach mentioned in the [developer notes](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#shebang)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 6094222de7820d235e6e8c66e589aa71db08c077, I have reviewed the code, and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: fc58632f0a6fa82c7abdddfac4897f082110d647426d2b468cba6fabf6b34a015fcad47e5b26be98e629b8b0417b8781e8d89da67189e20da228b97b17f1a532
4f4ae6f97e210fa0a2aa274bcd2a77a226fe6a7e build: set AC_PREREQ to 2.69 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We use build macros such as `AX_CHECK_LINK_FLAG`, that require >=2.64, so our configure should also require Autoconf >= 2.64. The build would already blow up if 2.64 wasn't available. i.e:
```bash
configure.ac:320: error: Autoconf version 2.64 or higher is required
build-aux/m4/ax_check_link_flag.m4:74: AX_CHECK_LINK_FLAG is expanded from...
```
For reference, Autoconf 2.69 was released in [April of 2012](https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2012-04/msg00041.html).
See the [Autoconf Versioning docs](https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Versioning.html) for more info on `AC_PREREQ`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 4f4ae6f97e210fa0a2aa274bcd2a77a226fe6a7e, Autoconf 2.69 seems wide available.
laanwj:
ACK 4f4ae6f97e210fa0a2aa274bcd2a77a226fe6a7e
Tree-SHA512: b77de9164ae6667513d40edaf9e16c6e7734c100643297b2dbb2ff54072774fdeab7b3b15d52979b99e204c1c4dcca4725ff155d7f6fdab7a867629130e10185
faede70882b4fd54390f5205dbe1dbcf019195c8 doc: Add formatting to the good first issue template (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Add minor formatting to the good first issue template so that it is easier to see with one glance what the required skills are.
Preview is here: https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/issues/new/choose
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK faede70882b4fd54390f5205dbe1dbcf019195c8
Tree-SHA512: 0b0fcd051166981455061442e69f42c9fa726eaa228856e57434e012f7224781f4f3f12c31ce0a7a322df9999e79a8fbe63bf800b7933bc52c7cdaed90f37598
1c26c16065182ca2d2cdbb05fae79cac8c75f17d Improve "Hide" button tool-tip message (Danny-Scott)
Pull request description:
Cleaned up the tool tip text, it looks as though it just got included back in 2014 when the whole section was added.
Changed hide button tool tip within transaction fee settings area from "collapse fee-settings" to "Hide transaction fee settings" to be more user friendly and fit with other tool tips.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 1c26c16065182ca2d2cdbb05fae79cac8c75f17d
Tree-SHA512: e2c83271c273f785ac625da9f88e095076043e21a9c59792049c271747837d19483e0cae5466c26ef3231947b6245680c4c136a530ba6f1885f9ddc18f2560d6
fcb72616253ed22e364bc312992d77efc1c4a3c1 Prevent valgrind false positive in rest_blockhash_by_height (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
A bad interaction between valgrind and clang 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 with -O2 optimizations makes valgrind misleadingly imply C++ code is reading an uninitialized blockheight value in `rest_blockhash_by_height` just because that's what clang optimized code is doing. The C++ code looks like:
```c++
int32_t blockheight;
if (!ParseInt32(height_str, &blockheight) || blockheight < 0) {
```
while the optimized code looks like:
```
0x00000000000f97ab <+123>: callq 0x4f8860 <ParseInt32(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int*)>
0x00000000000f97b0 <+128>: mov 0xc(%rsp),%ebx
0x00000000000f97b4 <+132>: test %ebx,%ebx
0x00000000000f97b6 <+134>: js 0xf98aa <rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)+378>
0x00000000000f97bc <+140>: xor $0x1,%al
0x00000000000f97be <+142>: jne 0xf98aa <rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)+378>
```
During the rest_interface.py test:
eef90c14ed/test/functional/interface_rest.py (L266)
when `height_str` is empty, `ParseInt32` returns false and `blockheight` value is never assigned. The optimized code reads the uninitialized `blockheight` value in `0xc(%rsp)` before the checking the `ParseInt32` return value in `%al`, which is harmless, but triggers the following error from valgrind:
```
==30660== Thread 13 b-httpworker.2:
==30660== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==30660== at 0x2017B6: rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) (rest.cpp:614)
==30660== by 0x2041B9: operator() (rest.cpp:670)
==30660== by 0x2041B9: std::_Function_handler<bool (HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&), StartREST(util::Ref const&)::$_1>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&, HTTPRequest*&&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) (std_function.h:301)
==30660== by 0x3EC994: operator() (std_function.h:706)
==30660== by 0x3EC994: HTTPWorkItem::operator()() (httpserver.cpp:55)
==30660== by 0x3ED16D: WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>::Run() (httpserver.cpp:114)
==30660== by 0x3E9168: HTTPWorkQueueRun(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>*, int) (httpserver.cpp:342)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: __invoke_impl<void, void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int> (invoke.h:60)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: __invoke<void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int> (invoke.h:95)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: _M_invoke<0, 1, 2> (thread:234)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: operator() (thread:243)
==30660== by 0x3EDAAA: std:🧵:_State_impl<std:🧵:_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>*, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure>*, int> > >::_M_run() (thread:186)
==30660== by 0x64256DE: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25)
==30660== by 0x54876DA: start_thread (pthread_create.c:463)
==30660== by 0x6DC888E: clone (clone.S:95)
==30660== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==30660== at 0x20173A: rest_blockhash_by_height(util::Ref const&, HTTPRequest*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) (rest.cpp:608)
==30660==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Cond
fun:_ZL24rest_blockhash_by_heightRKN4util3RefEP11HTTPRequestRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE
fun:operator()
fun:_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFbP11HTTPRequestRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEEZ9StartRESTRKN4util3RefEE3$_1E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataOS1_S9_
fun:operator()
fun:_ZN12HTTPWorkItemclEv
fun:_ZN9WorkQueueI11HTTPClosureE3RunEv
fun:_ZL16HTTPWorkQueueRunP9WorkQueueI11HTTPClosureEi
fun:__invoke_impl<void, void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int>
fun:__invoke<void (*)(WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int), WorkQueue<HTTPClosure> *, int>
fun:_M_invoke<0, 1, 2>
fun:operator()
fun:_ZNSt6thread11_State_implINS_8_InvokerISt5tupleIJPFvP9WorkQueueI11HTTPClosureEiES6_iEEEEE6_M_runEv
obj:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.25
fun:start_thread
fun:clone
}
```
This is a known bad interaction between clang and valgrind. The clang optimized code is correct but valgrind has no way of knowing that accessing the uninitialized value isn't a problem. Issue has been reported previously:
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32604#c4
- https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3/issues/972
This commit just sets blockheight to -1 as a workaround.
This change was originally made in 41d5d651594c6c939add7a58b7e30c97dccdf24a from #18740 to fix the travis error there (https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/678453061#L7157) but MarcoFalke suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18740#discussion_r414772851 moving to a new PR, since apparently the error's been seen on travis previously
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK fcb72616253ed22e364bc312992d77efc1c4a3c1
practicalswift:
ACK fcb72616253ed22e364bc312992d77efc1c4a3c1
Tree-SHA512: ec8abf45bd3d6c6e0e7e404d0b2a749efd43910619b84b0b5fe7dab22881598d1011a0f3ff2e146bf46320b63eb152bf63c62c06f1ab84c35dd640abc468f18f
da0842dcd44f8c9c9b167917fac0949b4978c3b0 build: Update ax_boost_mase.m4 to the latest serial (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Picked from the upstream 90814f1895Fix#17010.
This PR is [alternative](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17010#issuecomment-610651736) to #18501.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK da0842dcd44f8c9c9b167917fac0949b4978c3b0
Tree-SHA512: 5e43e12c524e4ea6b967c9be02c81a75948eac6cf55b819e3339222a2e3414731581d40af3524ad865abae7c5247c190448ebf2aa5e0d9a338edb501cc23ba38
f65c9ad40f2f5cdc581bdaf72e7dc68e9d7f7a80 Check for overflow when calculating sum of outputs (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
This was reported by practicalswift here #18046
The exact order of the if, is important, we first do `!MoneyRange(tx_out.nValue)` to make sure the amount is non-negative. and then `std::numeric_limits<CAmount>::max() - tx_out.nValue < nValueOut` checks that the addition cannot overflow (if we won't check that the amount is positive this check can also overflow! (by doing something like `max - -max`))
and only then we make sure that the some is also valid `!MoneyRange(nValueOut + tx_out.nValue)`
if any of these conditions fail we throw.
the overflowing logic:
```
a + b > max // we want to fail if a+b is more than the maximum -> will overflow
b > max - a
max - a < b
```
Closes: #18046
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f65c9ad40f2f5cdc581bdaf72e7dc68e9d7f7a80, checked that clang with O2 produces identical binaries 💕
practicalswift:
ACK f65c9ad40f2f5cdc581bdaf72e7dc68e9d7f7a80
instagibbs:
utACK f65c9ad40f
vasild:
ACK f65c9ad40f2f5cdc581bdaf72e7dc68e9d7f7a80 modulo `s/assert.h/cassert/`
Tree-SHA512: 512d6cf4762f24c41cf9a38da486b17b19c634fa3f4efbdebfe6608779e96fc3014d5d2d29adb8001e113152c0217bbd5b3900ac4edc7b8abe77f82f36209e33
